The Spending Sequester Will Grow the Private Economy — Don’t Back Off
By keeping resources in private hands, rather than transferring them to the inefficient government sector, the spending sequester is actually pro-growth.
This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Joe Miller contributed 20834 entries already.
By keeping resources in private hands, rather than transferring them to the inefficient government sector, the spending sequester is actually pro-growth.
Kentucky Senator Rand Paul will continue to advocate for a scaled back federal role in airport security, along with individual privacy rights.
Under the law, the penalty for not buying health insurance is supposed to be capped at either the annual average Bronze premium, 2.5 percent of taxable income, or $2,085.00 per family in 2016.
More evidence that the Democrats have no intention of closing our porous southern border.
Initially favoring ObamaCare, Union bosses are now working on avoiding costs associated with universal healthcare.
We find it odd that an Obama administration that rails against oil industry profits, blames fossil fuels for planet-threatening climate change, and places vast energy-rich areas off-limits to U.S. oil companies is encouraging Chinese investment in American energy and the transfer of our latest energy-producing technology to them.
Israel’s focus may have been arms for Hezbollah, but Syria has nonetheless seized on the strike as evidence of Israeli complicity in the uprising against Assad.
Obama met with the council only a handful of times. Critics have argued that the council’s primary purpose was to create the appearance of action at a time when the nation was pining for something — anything — to rein in soaring joblessness.
Iran has apparently stepped up its bomb program at another facility to maintain its posture with West.
Wasn’t Obama going to save us billions by eliminating fraud, waste and abuse? Could have sworn that was how he was going to pay for Obamacare . . .
