Ground Based Interceptor Test Failed, Raises Questions About Effectiveness of Fort Greely, Vandenberg ABM Force

Photo Credit: APAn interceptor missile designed to blast nuclear missiles out of the sky failed to hit its target during a test of the weapon at a Southern California coastal base, officials said.

A ground-based interceptor missile was launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base Friday and was supposed to hit its target — a missile launched 4,000 miles away from the Kwajalein Atoll, according to the Missile Defense Agency.

But the interceptor did not hit its target. Officials will try to determine the cause of any anomalies that may have prevented a successful intercept…

The interceptor is one of about 30 deployed in Alaska and at Vandenberg under a missile defense program begun in 2004. In March, the Pentagon announced it will spend $1 billion to place another 14 interceptors in Alaska. The military said it’s responding to North Korean progress on nuclear weapons.

Read more from this story HERE.

Alaska Republican Party Loses Another Popularly-Elected Official

Photo Credit: dmcdevitOn July 4, 2013, the Secretary of the Alaska Republican Party, Alicé Leuchte, resigned from the increasingly troubled state party, claiming that she was not only “blocked from contributing the expertise I promised the Delegates at the State Convention, but I have also found myself serving alongside fewer and fewer properly elected officers.” Here’s her letter of resignation:

Dear Fellow Republicans:

I came to the Alaska Republican Party as an outsider, and volunteered to work for Alaska Republicans. I brought with me my experiences within the Republican Partyof Virginia and affiliated organizations, as well as my creative talents and skills gained in my professional life in New York, Miami and elsewhere. Due to rare circumstances, I was able to volunteer these resources to the Alaska Republican Party on a full-time basis throughout a two-year term.

Looking back at the past year, I have not only been blocked from contributing the expertise I promised the Delegates at the State Convention (32:25), but I have also found myself serving alongside fewer and fewer properly elected officers.

A Party that claims fealty to constitutional, self-government must have leadership that is concerned with the integrity of the political process, and willing to serve a common set of rules and principles. The rules and platform of a Party are the guidelines on how the leadership of a Party is to represent and serve the members. If you are currently in a leadership position, and not interested in serving Alaskans within those parameters, you may soon find yourself standing alone.

Thankfully, the responsibility of maintaining integrity in our political process doesn’t just fall to leadership, but to all Alaskans. Our strength is in our numbers, and together we have the strength to restore our representative, republican system – with or without the blessing of those occupying leadership roles. It is not a State Chairman or a State Executive Committee that determines the values and policies of the Republican Party within Alaska. It is Alaska Republicans that dictate the direction of our Party.

Therefore, I am calling on all Alaska Republicans to restore the representative, republican nature that should guide our Party, and organize under the Founding values that we share. How this is done I will leave to you.

In closing, here is my official statement:

I was elected to the office of Secretary in order to serve Alaska Republicans, safe guard the representative process and promote republican principles. The organization currently known as the Alaska Republican Party does not serve these interests, and I refuse to cooperate with those who abuse volunteers, violate the trust of voters, accept donations from unions and seek influence through intimidation and coercion. Therefore, I will continue to serve the trust given to me by Alaska Republicans, and disavow this organization. Thank you.

Constitutionally yours,
Alicé Leuchte
Former Secretary of the Alaska Republican Party

Republican Senator Accuses Group of Bribing People To Block New Alaskan Mine’s Construction

Photo Credit: Opposing Views

Photo Credit: Opposing Views

Republican Sen. David Vitter claimed an environmental group tried to skew survey results regarding the construction of a new Alaskan mine, which has recently put Republicans and the Environmental Protection Agency at odds.

Vitter accused the group, Trout Unlimited, of “bribing” people to comment on a study examining the environmental impact of the new mine by offering them a chance to win a free fishing trip, according to Fox News.

The study, which was conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency, looked into the effects of the proposed copper and gold mine — named Pebble Mine — on its surrounding the Alaskan ecosystem, according to the Washington Free Beacon.

“This is a pretty low tactic to try and bribe support of their efforts to preemptively kill a job-creating project,” Vitter said. “Skewing the public’s response is really unhelpful in the process to get an unbiased review.”

Read more from this story HERE.

Anchorage Activists Protest Against Boehner’s Fundraiser With Former ARP Chair Randy Ruedrich (+video)

A group of Anchorage Tea Party activists protested GOP House Speaker John Boehner’s fundraiser with former Alaska Republican Party Chair Randy Ruedrich and other Alaska establishment politicos such as Commissioner Dan Sullivan.

The GOP event, held in a residential area, was carefully choreographed so that Boehner did not have to confront the protesters, many of whom were criticizing GOP support for Rubio’s amnesty bill:

Boehner Protest Amnesty2

Boehner Protest Amnesty3

Boehner Protest Amnesty

Some of the protesters pointed out that Boehner and the other state Republican officials were consorting with members of the self-described “Corrupt Bastards Club”:

Boehner Protest CBC

The activists also chanted an anti-amnesty message:

Shaking Down the Public at Alaska State Parks

Photo Credit: Alaskan Dude

Photo Credit: Alaskan Dude

A couple of days ago, I decided to go fishing at Rocky Lake. I loaded up the float tube and had my wife drop me off at the local public access point, which happens to be a state park. I unloaded the float tube, told my wife I would call he for a ride home, and proceeded down to the lake.

A few yards into the park I was interrupted by a state park employee named Holly. She informed me I “still had to pay.” I informed her I had a constitutional right to access navigable water from the public domain and one does not pay to exercise ones rights. The discussion ensued.

Holly’s main point was the park belongs to the State of Alaska and she was charging the public for access to state property although she did mention that state and federal agencies are exempted from paying these fees.

My point was the park is public domain, it belongs to the people and while it is appropriate to charge for services rendered, citizens have a right enumerated by our state constitution to access the park. Since I was not utilizing any service, no fee could be charged.

In an attempt to give my point credibility , I informed Holly that the understanding of the issue I have, is from information I have reviewed while serving on the state Citizens Advisory Commission on Federal Area’s.

Holly while still disagreeing, took my name and phone number and said a park ranger will get back to me. She decided to allow me to continue to the lake. She ended our conversation with a sarcastic “have a nice day” knowing that she disturbed what would have otherwise been for me a pleasant time on the lake.

As I was out one the lake I began thinking about how she had turned away local kids away from the camp ground for not paying and how such a thing would have affected my childhood in Alaska.

I simply could not let the situation stand.

Returning home I proceed to research my position to ensure I did not overlook something . I did Not.

Article 8 of Alaska’s constitution has clearly established the citizen’s right to access public resources. Sections 2,3 ,6,14 and 15 all affirm this right. In fact section 14 explicitly states “Free access to the navigable or public waters of the State, as defined by the legislature, shall not be denied any citizen of the United States or resident of the State,” It does mention regulation for other purposes not applicable here since the the point of a park IS public access.

I looked at statute as well and found these applicable statutes:

AS 41.21.026 (12) (b) – “The department may not charge or collect a fee for an ordinary use of a park unit or the use of a rest room in a park unit.”

and a lawful concessionaire

AS 41.21.027 (6) – “recognizes and accommodates, at no cost, ordinary uses in a park unit…”

With this information in hand I trotted down to my State Representative, Mark Neuman’s office to register a complaint. Representative Neuman was attentive and effective. Within minutes had an answer to the specific question from the State Park supervisor she sent an email stating,

“In response to your request for information regarding fees charged at the Rocky Lake State Recreation Site, the following fees apply:

Daily use of designated parking areas with access to rest rooms – $5 per vehicle per day; Overnight camping – $15 per site per night There is no fee for use of the site that does not include any of the above.”

While it was nice to see the state park supervisor confirm what the constitution and statute enumerate, I still cannot help but think this same scenario of shaking down the public to access their public land plays out in camp grounds and parks across Alaska.

The right of the people to access resources in the public domain is as essential to our liberty as any other right. We must ensure our children and our state employees understand this right.

I hope you share with others this knowledge, that our lands belong to us and managers of that land are trustees, not exclusive owners of the resource.

Alaska Volcano Eruptions Get Worse: `We Can’t Explain’ Says Geologist (+video)

volcanoAlaska volcano eruptions are entering a more powerful phase. After six weeks of Alaska volcano eruptions reaching five miles into the sky, covering nearby communities with ash and shutting down air flights, there looks to be no end.

Alaska volcano eruptions 2013 started in May at the Pavlof Volcano, which is located about 590 miles southwest of the major city Anchorage, in the Alaska Peninsula. The most powerful phase of Alaska volcano eruptions started with low-level rumblings.

According to scientists at the federal-state Alaska Volcano Observatory, the latest phase of Alaska volcano eruptions started late on Monday and continued through the night into Tuesday. The blasts emanate from the crater of a 8,261 foot volcano.

Tina Neal, an geologist at the observatory said, “For some reason we can’t explain, it picked up in intensity and vigor.”

In May, Alaska volcano eruptions sent a smaller ash cloud 15,000 feet into the air. The ash was visible for miles. Residents were worried that it would damage power generators.

Read more from this story HERE.

Sarah Palin: If Amnesty Bill Passes, Time to Abandon GOP

Photo Credit: J. Scott Applewhite

Photo Credit: J. Scott Applewhite

Great job, GOP establishment. You’ve just abandoned the Reagan Democrats with this amnesty bill, and we needed them to “enlarge that tent” of which you so often speak. It’s depressing to consider that the House of Representatives is threatening to pass some version of this nonsensical bill in the coming weeks.

Once again, I’ll point out the obvious to you: it was the loss of working class voters in swing states that cost us the 2012 election, not the Hispanic vote. Legal immigrants respect the rule of law and can see how self-centered a politician must be to fill this amnesty bill with favors, earmarks, and crony capitalists’ pork, and call it good. You disrespect Hispanics with your assumption that they desire ignoring the rule of law.

Folks like me are barely hanging on to our enlistment papers in any political party – and it’s precisely because flip-flopping political actions like amnesty force us to ask how much more bull from both the elephants in the Republican Party and the jackasses in the Democrat Party we have to swallow before these political machines totally abandon the average commonsense hardworking American. Now we turn to watch the House. If they bless this new “bi-partisan” hyper-partisan devastating plan for amnesty, we’ll know that both private political parties have finally turned their backs on us. It will then be time to show our parties’ hierarchies what we think of being members of either one of these out-of-touch, arrogant, and dysfunctional political machines.

Read more from this story HERE.

US Supreme Court Ruling Keeps Alaska in Driver Seat to Define Marriage

Photo Credit: dmcdevit

Photo Credit: dmcdevit

Today’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling regarding the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and Prop 8, California’s successful citizen initiative that defined marriage as a union between one man and one woman, highlights how important it is that Alaska was the first state in the nation in 1998 to define natural marriage in our own State Constitution.

Thank God we as citizens of Alaska ignored the advice of those who said we should wait for the Court to determine what this essential institution means.

Although you will hear from most media sources that DOMA was dismantled today, Justice Kennedy, acknowledges in his majority opinion the inherent right of individual states to define and regulate marriage as they see fit.

For most Americans, the big picture is more of what the Court did not do:

*It did not create a constitutional right to same-sex marriage as it did for abortion in 1973.

*It also did not declare same-sex marriage a civil right on the order of ethnicity or nationality.

The critical role of natural marriage is not diminished by these rulings today. The essential need for children to have both a married mother and father is not lessened by the opinions of five unelected black robes on the U.S. Supreme Court. The work of Alaska Family Action to strengthen marriage and families continues, as well.

Now more than ever, Alaskans must not stay silent on cherishing and promoting the truth of natural marriage. Whatever journalists, intellectuals and other elites may tell us, the only way to guarantee future political losses is to sit idly by.

We must step up and frame our message, strengthen our coalitions, devise strategies and bear witness to a culture looking for answers.

Though Alaska Family Action disagrees with aspects of the Court’s decision, we are grateful that the Court did not undermine the will of Alaska voters who defined marriage in our State Constitution.

In DOMA, we believe that the court erred in claiming that a state that has redefined marriage can force that definition on the federal government for purposes of federal marriage laws.

In Prop 8, the court has ensured that the state-by-state debate about marriage is allowed to continue. Truly the debate over marriage has just begun.

Marriage is more than just a personal promise, it serves a public purpose. It is society’s best guarantee of a limited government that stays out of family life. Social science data has proved this time and time again.

Alaska Family Action is committed to continuing to stand for marriage and to defeat any efforts to redefine this essential union.

Stay tuned and stay engaged.

_________________________________________________________________________

Thank you for your interest in the Alaska Family Action. We are an Alaska-based pro-family, public policy organization formed to provide a voice on social and cultural issues impacting Alaskan families. We are funded entirely by the generous contributions of individual Alaskans who believe in helping us to compete in the marketplace of ideas. By strengthening families in Alaska through informed citizenship, community involvement and improved public policy, the Alaska Family Action intends on being engaged in the important issues of our day on a long-term, ongoing basis. We look forward to serving you and ask you to join us financially, prayerfully and as an active volunteer partner.

Standing for families,

Jim Minnery

President

Alaska Family Action

Speaker John Boehner Headlining Alaskan Fundraiser with Randy Ruedrich and Commissioner Dan Sullivan in Anchorage

Photo Credit: AP

Photo Credit: AP

House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) is set to raise money in Alaska with the former chair of the Alaska GOP that Sarah Palin took on for corruption.

Politico reported on Thursday that Boehner will raise money in Alaska on July 2, and former Alaska GOP Chair Randy Ruedrich is listed on the invitation to the event.

According to Politico, Boehner will “headline a July 2 event at a private home in Anchorage to collect donations for the Boehner for Speaker joint fundraising committee, which benefits his campaign, PAC, the National Republican Congressional Committee and the Ohio Republican Party.” The maximum donation allowed is $52,600.

Rep. Don Young (R-AK), who has faced numerous ethics charges in Congress, is also on the host committee for the event.

Ruedrich ultimately resigned “his job as a state oil and gas regulator” in 2003 after Palin joined Democrats to call his political fundraising a conflict of interest for drawing money from industries he regulated.

Read more from this story HERE.

Alaska, Other States No Longer Subject to Key Provisions of 1965 Voting Rights Act

Photo Credit: Evan Vucci

Photo Credit: Evan Vucci

The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that states no longer can be judged by voting discrimination that went on decades ago, a decision that argues the country has fundamentally changed since the racially motivated laws of the civil rights era.

In a 5-4 ruling, the justices said the Voting Rights Act’s requirement that mainly Southern states must undergo special scrutiny before changing their voting laws is based on a 40-year-old formula that is no longer relevant to changing racial circumstances.

“Congress — if it is to divide the states — must identify those jurisdictions to be singled out on a basis that makes sense in light of current conditions. It cannot rely simply on the past,” Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote for the majority, which was comprised of the court’s conservative-leaning justices.

The four liberal-leaning justices dissented, arguing that racial discrimination in voting remains a real threat. The majority didn’t disagree with that, but the core of Chief Justice Roberts‘ opinion was that discrimination today looks markedly different from what it did decades ago, so the law must be changed to reflect that.

The Shelby County v. Holder ruling sparked an immediate debate about the status of race and discrimination in modern America.

Read more from this story HERE.