The Return of the Murkowski-Young Sealaska Earmark

The spirit of Ted Stevens is alive and well, and the Alaskan delegation’s renewed efforts to smuggle Juneau-based Sealaska Corporation’s earmark through the unaccountable lame duck Congress is powerful testimony to Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Rep. Don Young’s (R-Alaska) dogged loyalty, not to their constituents or the nation, but to the powerful corporate interests responsible for their elections.

Sealaska Corporation, a native-owned corporation that has thrived on government handouts since its formation in 1971, is back at the government trough, seeking to renegotiate long-settled native land claims at tremendous loss to the tax-paying public. Eager to satiate the desires of their most generous campaign supporters, Murkowski and Young have championed Sealaska’s land-grab legislation as a righteous resolution of legitimate cultural grievances. But a candid review of the Southeast Alaska Native Land Entitlement Finalization and Jobs Protection Act and the political circumstances surrounding it reveals a taxpayer-funded quid pro quo in the making.

Sealaska’s bill is nothing if not an earmark, and while conservatives in Congress have a lot on their dinner plates, principle demands taking a stand against a scheme so emblematic of the abuse of public trust all too pervasive in today’s America. Despite the Republican ban on earmarks, a version of the Sealaska land bill (HR.1408) passed the House of Representatives in June, but only because it is a tremendously complicated, quite subtle earmark that was bound up with several conservative constituent-pleasers including an NRA-backed proposal. While the bill is unlikely pass as part of the original House conglomeration, Sealaska’s policy in particular is gaining traction, thanks, in part, to a pile of aging land-use bills Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) would like to see passed as soon as possible. King Reid’s will usually prevails, and the Sealaska bill is perfect bait to charm Murkowski’s ostensibly Republican vote in his favor, not only for his Nevada-centric bills, but for whatever garbage winds up in the eventual cliff-averting grand bargain.

Although Young wants the Sealaska bill to pass as badly as Murkowkski, the bill is singularly important to the latter Alaskan lawmaker because the corporation coughed up $1.7 million for her 2010 reelection campaign. In a particular egregious instance of purchasing political clout, Sealaska Corporation generously funded—and , in large part, operated—Murkowski’s write-in campaign after she lost to Tea Party favorite and Fairbanks-based attorney Joe Miller. Despite the Alaskan GOP’s clear rejection of the Murkowski Monarchy, she remained in power because Miller, wishing to represent Alaskans rather than merely Sealaskans, opposed the corporate land grab. Executives of the corporation abhorred the thought of being weaned off the public teat, and so they collaborated with Murkowski and her lackeys, ultimately jointly executing the single most effective write-in campaign victory in American political history, bar none.

Despite the open and obvious will of the Alaskan GOP, Murkowski was welcomed back into the national Republican apparatus because a single senate vote was critically important in the pre-Obamacare days. Having retained power for at least another six years, Murkowski’s top priority was to attend to her financier’s desires. So Sealaska’s landgrab legislation, which had languished in various forms in Congress for the past decade, was reintroduced with renewed vigor in 2011. And Murkowski was joined in the effort by Don Young…

According to proponents of the Sealaska bill, the legislation is needed to finalize native land claims. In truth, Sealaska’s executives want the bill because it will significantly enrich the company’s top executives by transferring to their ownership more than 70,000 acres of public owned land including extensive infrastructure projects such as roads, bridges and log transfer sites. But the true value of the land is neither real estate nor taxpayer-funded roadways, but old-growth trees that started growing before the Revolutionary War. Sealaska does not conceal the fact that it wants to clear-cut ancient stands in the Tongass National Forest – they have done so on prior land claims – and sell the timber in Asia. Where, presumably, it will be turned into chairs and tables and sold back into America.

So while lawmakers and the media fret endlessly over cliffs and chasms, behind the closed doors of Congress a bipartisan cadre is quietly plotting on how best to sneak through pet legislation for their corporate cronies. Murkowski is hardly the only lawmaker following the oft-repeated mantra of Rahm Emanuel – never let a crisis go to waste. Sadly, the Sealaska land-grab threatens to destroy the communities and livelihoods of voiceless Alaskans whose wishes are unimportant to representatives beholden only to the overlords who allow them to remain in power.
______________________________________________________________

S.E. Robinson, a Maine native and graduate of Bowdoin College, is an investigative reporter with a passion for fishing, firearms and freedom. His work has been featured in Human Events, National Review Online, and TheBlaze.

Pro-Life Message is Winning: 13 of 16 Candidates Endorsed by Alaska Right to Life Victorious

photo credit: steve rhodes

Contrary to much of the propaganda being pushed by some politicos, the pro-life message is a winner. Thirteen of the sixteen candidates endorsed by Alaska Right to Life PAC prevailed in the November elections.

If you think that is anomalous, it comes on the heels of a primary election season in which eight out of eleven Alaska Right to Life endorsed candidates won contested primaries. Included in that number were two now senators-elect who bested incumbents: Mike Dunleavy of Wasilla, and Peter Micciche of Soldotna. Alaska Right to Life did independent expenditures for both.

In the general election, Alaska Right to Life PAC funded two independent expenditures: one for Bob Bell of Anchorage who lost by a mere 59 votes to one of the state’s top Democrat pro-abortion advocates; the other for Pete Kelly of Fairbanks who defeated Democrat incumbent Joe Paskvan.

Alaska Right to Life’s efforts appear to be paying off with the formation of a new pro-life Republican majority in the State Senate. The House has a large Republican majority as well, but the jury is still out on whether pro-lifers will be able to move key legislation after House Speaker Mike Chenault invited five Democrats into the Majority coalition.

With a combined 27 endorsed candidates in both elections, and 21 victories, we at Alaska Right to Life want to pause and give thanks to God that we are one step closer to ending the blight of abortion in Alaska. If we can retain our gains, and replicate these successes over the next couple election cycles, it is our belief that we can soon close the books on this sad chapter of our State’s history.

Read more from this story HERE.

Mr. Begich, It’s On! But Will Treadwell Be The Next Romney?

photo credit: usdagov

By now, you have all probably heard that Lt. Governor Mead Treadwell announced on Friday that he is launching an exploratory committee to decide whether he should run for the United States Senate seat now held by former Anchorage Mayor Mark Begich. As I read the well-wishes on the Lt. Governor’s facebook page today urging him on, I was left with a couple of nagging questions. Is Treadwell the right man for the job? And more importantly, is he up to it?

To all the Republicans out there who think this is going to be easy, I have a few words of caution.

First, Mark Begich is, without doubt, the most savvy politician in the state. Second, the whole government-media-complex will work tirelessly to make sure their golden boy wins re-election. Third, he will have David Axelrod and the whole ‘Chicago Machine’ at his disposal. And last, but not least, his secret weapon: unlike most politicians, people actually like this guy.

Am I suggesting that the 2014 race for US Senate is already a done deal? Not at all. But I am saying that we shouldn’t run hastily into a marriage that isn’t a good fit, and that will not likely end with an oath.

There are no less than five other potential candidates out there who have yet to make their intentions known, and I have privileged information that suggests there may be a wild-card in the works that could take the whole political establishment by surprise.

As for the Romney analogy, there are a lot of similarities between the psychology of Alaska Republicans, and that of the RNC who wanted nothing more than to beat Barack Obama. The Alaska Republican Party has proudly displayed an ad on its webpage urging the defeat of Mark Begich in 2014 ever since he assumed the seat in the United States Senate once occupied by the late-Senator Ted Stevens.

And so, like the National Republicans, the effort is already underway in Alaska to ‘immaculate the One’ who would defeat Mark Begich. Conventional wisdom is that if we can just unite behind a candidate early in the process, there will magically be unity in Republican ranks. And we will sweep to victory . . . and live happily ever after.

Didn’t we just try this with Romney? Was it just me, or was he running for the nomination for the last four years? And am I the only one who just saw how that worked out?

But the larger view that Party luminaries and political pundits miss is that some of us actually care about policy. We don’t just want to vote against someone. We want to vote for something. We don’t want consensus; we want leadership.

Wasn’t that the lesson of the 2010 US Senate race here? Some of us aren’t content to join the coronation for a candidate that in many respects is very similar to Mark Begich. Like Ronald Reagan before us, we want bold colors, not pale pastels. Aren’t there already too many do-nothing senators in Washington who are inebriated on the wine of their own self-importance, and are happy just to be a part of the club?

Now I’m not suggesting that Mead Treadwell would be a do-nothing senator, though he did support one in 2010. He is an affable guy, a deal-maker, and has big ideas. But it is precisely the fact that he has such big ideas that I find troubling, because they are the wrong ideas.

I am speaking of Mead’s penchant for ideology. Yes, I know ‘he’s a pragmatist not an ideologue.’ However, the doctrine of man-made global warming is nothing if not an ideology. The dogged belief in the inherent benevolence of the United Nations is nothing if not an ideology. And the pragmatism of compromise itself can become the handmaiden of ideology when it becomes an end in itself.

We already have a ‘Republican’ in the United States Senate who only wishes to be named among the ‘cool kids.’ She hasn’t passed a stand-alone bill in her 10 long years in the United States Senate. What we don’t have, and what I don’t wish to have, is one who is effective at getting the wrong things done. So before I’ll be jumping on the bandwagon, I need some answers from Mr. Treadwell.

If elected to the United States Senate, will he continue to push for International Treaties that would strip us of our sovereign Right to self-governance? Will he join the push for carbon taxes, or cap and trade? What would he do right now about the impending ‘fiscal cliff?’ What is his plan to rein in federal spending? Will he vote to allow leftist judges through Senate confirmation like his friend Murkowski? Does he support the President’s ‘tax hikes for the rich?’ What about social conservative issues? The second amendment? Will he vote for amnesty for illegal aliens? Does he favor reforming the tax code? What does he intend to do about the looming insolvency of Medicare and Social Security? Does he support full repeal of Obamacare? Will he support auditing the Fed? . . .

These are the things conservatives want to know. Until we have answers, support should not be offered.

Yeah, Treadwell’s a rich moderate that can appeal to independents. Romney won those voters overwhelmingly. How’d that work out for us?

Yeah, Treadwell is the anointed candidate of the Republican establishment. So was Romney. How’d that work out for us?

Yeah, Treadwell is an experienced businessman and government manager. So was Romney. How’d that work out for us?

Yeah, Treadwell is a decent man who believes in a fair fight. So was Romney. How’d that work out for us?

The bottom line is not that Mead Treadwell is a bad man that you should not support. It is rather that he is a man we still don’t have answers from, and who still hasn’t been vetted.

He may well be the candidate that emerges who will unite the party, and defeat Mark Begich. But we don’t know that yet.

I am a firm believer in the inherent wisdom and goodness of the people to make better choices than the politicos. It is up to us, not the Washington insiders, or the Juneau elites. So let the process work itself out. Get involved. Ask the questions. And for God’s sake, don’t settle for Mitt Romney.

Matt Johnson is a freelance writer, consultant, and political activist who resides in Chugiak, AK

Alaska Plunging Full Speed Ahead Toward Internationalism (With the Help of its Political Establishment)

As we’ve reported over the last several months, almost the entirety of Alaska’s political establishment, including Governor Parnell, Lieutenant Governor Mead Treadwell, Senators Murkowski and Begich, and virtually the entirety of the state legislature, support adoption of the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST). This internationalist scheme to extend UN jurisdiction over two thirds of the earth’s surface should make any Constitution-loving Alaskan’s blood boil. To make matters worse, the political leadership attempts to justify LOST with the pathetic excuse that it would be “good for Alaska business.”

We’ll break down that Benedict Arnold-like excuse for selling sovereignty down the UN drain in a future article. But for now, it’s time to focus on another imminent threat to our national integrity: the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

This treaty, criticized by Restoring Liberty in earlier posts here and here, also has support among Alaska’s political class. In fact, it is openly supported by Alaska Governor Parnell’s Council on Disabilities and Special Education:

Most Alaskans should be scratching their heads over this new effort to subjugate Alaska to the whimsical dictates of the United Nations.

Here’s what’s wrong with the treaty. In an article entitled “Back Door Globalism,” Senators DeMint and Inhofe criticize the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities warning that it “calls for government agents to supersede the authority of parents of disabled children and even covers abortion.”

ParentalRights.org further explains that the treaty “poses a serious threat to the right of parents with disabled children to make decisions on behalf of those children regarding their education, medical care, and other areas of life. By introducing the “best interest of the child” principle as a government obligation (Article 7.2), the CRPD places bureaucrats in the position to make the ultimate decisions regarding each child.”

Homeschool advocate HSLDA also sees real danger in the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, claiming that it is a backdoor means of requiring compliance with the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, a treaty that “enshrines abortion rights, homosexual rights, and demands the complete disarmament of all people.”

HSLDA also suggests that the treaty will mandate national spending priorities, require US funding for poorer countries’ disability programs, and require all persons to have handicap accessible residences. Also cited are infringement on autonomy of homeschooling by requiring government-directed disability programs to be administered, banning of corporal punishment, and other government-mandated intrusions into the family and home.

From the perspective of a states rights advocate, the treaty is very threatening. All American law on disabilities will be required to conform to the dictates and standards of the United Nations treaty. Obviously, this is a terrible infringement on a state’s right to legislate in this area. Under the Constitution, the federal government has no enumerated power giving it such authority. But now, under the treaty, the United States will be under one international standard – enforced by the federal government – further displacing state sovereignty.

In short, no Constitution-honoring political leader should offer even tacit support to this treaty. They must be held accountable.

“America’s Favorite Cities Survey” Disses Anchorage

Miami has long been famed for its palm-fringed beaches and glamorous nightlife but now it can boast another attraction – its people. The Florida city has been voted home to the most beautiful people in America by a new survey.

It was a bumper year for the Floridians as they were also in the top 10 for their fashion sense and fit physique, although they also ranked as being among the most aloof.

In final place was Anchorage – the Alaska city held onto its last-place position from 2011, and the took last place for style – although local they did come in the top 20 for being both affable and a little offbeat.

The annual results from America’s Favorite Cities survey were complied by Travel + Leisure readers. Readers rated 35 metropolitan areas for qualities such as people-watching, walkable streets, and good music scenes.

In second place for attractive locals was San Diego although locals’ conversational skills were not rated highly.

Read more from this story HERE.

Director of Alaska Native Corporation Suspected in Rape, Alleged Victim Reportedly Dies of Suicide

A woman who allegedly was sexually assaulted has killed herself, her family said.

The woman shot herself in Naknek over the weekend, according to the Anchorage Daily News.

Prosecutors now are evaluating their case against Sergie Andrew Chukwak, who authorities say assaulted a woman Nov. 5 after a night of drinking. Chukwak could not immediately be reached for comment Tuesday and it was unclear if he had an attorney.

The state had planned to seek an indictment on a felony rape charge against Chukwak, 45, who is a commercial fisherman and a director for the Bristol Bay Native Corp., one of 13 regional Alaska Native corporations.

Prosecutors now are trying to determine if there is enough evidence to pursue the case without victim testimony, according to assistant District Attorney Marianna Carpeneti. She said police are talking to witnesses.

Read more from this story HERE.

Governor Parnell, Anchorage Mayor Sullivan Clash on South Central Energy Crisis

photo credit: jber

Where Southcentral will get its energy in the near future was up for debate between the Anchorage mayor and the governor at the Resource Development Council’s annual conference.

“Everyone needs affordable energy,” said Anchorage Mayor Dan Sullivan during his opening remarks Nov. 14, and added it was almost a given that Southcentral would be importing natural gas in the near future to bridge supply shortages projected for the 2014-15 winter.

Speaking a few minutes later during the same opening session, Gov. Sean Parnell disagreed.

“Mayor Sullivan, importing gas, I don’t think so,” Parnell said. “We have got to do better than that. And I will work my tail off, to make sure that we don’t have to do that. My hope is that these incentives will work in Cook Inlet so that’s not necessary. Not when our resources here are so vast.

“Importing has got to be a last option, or a last resort.”

Read more from this story HERE.

Phantoms of the Lost Tribes

I am a proud Aleut elder of the Native Village of Kanatak. I lived in the village of Kanatak in the 1950’s. My Dad, who was Aleut-Russian, was born there and practiced his culture. He used to tell me stories of how his people buried fish heads in the ground to ferment. How they hung their summer catch of salmon on fish racks to dry for winter food. He hunted, trapped and fished, carrying on the tradition taught to him by his elders. He raised our family there, as he was raised. I love hearing and recounting the stories now, of the days we used to live in Kanatak and other village communities.

I am also proud to be an American. I would never trade my citizenship for that of any other country. But I can appreciate that, although our Government for many years has determined they know what is best for our people, we have become the most recent victims of governmental bureaucracy. Our forebears were taken from their homes and move to depleted broken down shacks during the war, children ripped from our souls to be sent to boarding schools, their native identities removed. Our lives have been rearranged. Assistance has been given, then taken back, (sort of like the term “Indian giver”) and its connotation, only it was not the Indians giving and taking away this time.

Some of us have now have been labeled “phantom”. Guess you could say we are “phantoms of the lost tribes”. How can anyone tell a person that they do not exist because they were forced to relocate from one village to another local? How can anyone make a person’s culture, ethnicity, lineage and personal identity be erased and asked to disappear, simply because where they once lived has been taken from them? Does a person become a phantom because they cannot return to their ancestral home?

I may be a figment of my own imagination, an ethereal being floating around this world, not knowing that I exist. You can see me, you can hear me, but in the minds of some people, I do not exist because I do not live on that piece of land that was once my village. I have always felt proud of being an Aleut, a minority. Even the word minority, used to describe our people, has a negative ring to it today. Doesn’t that mean secondary and less than? Minority has come to mean someone who is not Caucasian. Who decides when a person is a minority or not. Does that make those not considered minority, the “Majority”?

Does anyone recall the years when so many Alaska Native children of school age had to be sent away from their parents, families, and their total ethnic existence, to attend Government schools? The native way was all they knew. My Dad was one of those students. My Mom was one of those students. I was one of those students. They never spoke of their days in the Eklutna Government boarding school, but I can imagine it could not have been so different from mine, attending first Wrangell Institute, then Mt. Edgecumbe, in Sitka.

I cried so many tears in those first days, my eyes burned from the salt, my very being burning with longing for the things that were familiar to me. I craved the foods we ate, and the very nature of how we lived; the hunting and the fishing. All I wanted was to run away and go back home. I had to live in a small room in a boarding school that had several bunk beds in it, and I, at the age of 13, had to become a Mother figure to the three little 6 and 7 year-olds who were placed in that room with me.

They could not speak English. They had never been out of their village or away from their parents.

Can those of you who were never forced into that situation, imagine how it would be to send your 6 and 7-year-old children or grandchildren hundreds of miles away, to be tended by a 13 year old? Telephones did not exist in villages then. The mail took months to get there and back. Correspondence was almost non-existent. Now we are ostracized for having to be sent away, not by choice, but force.

We had to leave our families at a young age to attend schools in far away places to learn a strange culture, language, and way of life. If we chose not to return to our ancestral homes when we completed your teachings, were we not still Native, yearning for a way of life lost to us forever? I am not saying it was bad to get an education. I am not crying over spilled milk. What I am saying is, maybe it could have been done differently. Maybe, just maybe, it could have been done in a way that would cause my people and our culture less pain. Maybe it would have been less expensive to build one school in each village for many children instead of sending many children to a few boarding schools. Maybe not, but I ask that we not be punished now for something we had no control over.

It was the Government who divided our former tribal village land of Kanatak and gave it to one native tribe (Konaig) while our tribal members were assigned to a separate group in a different area (Bristol Bay). I like the one we were assigned to (BBNA). When most of the residents had to leave Kanatak after the volcanic eruption of Katmai and the flu epidemic, they moved to the area that accepted them and they had close family ties to (Bristol Bay). Their summer homes were in Bristol Bay, where they would fish the summer season to buy supplies to take back to Kanatak for the winter.

I would not want to have to change to a group other than Bristol Bay. No one from Konaig lives on the piece of land that was once our village site. Kanatak was decimated by the volcanic eruption of Katmai in 1912, the flu epidemic, the loss of the village school, post office and store, after the oil companies pulled out in the early 1950’s. The members of our tribe have tried for years to negotiate to buy or get back a small piece of our village land.

The following are the cultural memories that live on in my mind, from when I lived in Kanatak. Those cannot be erased from my mind by anyone. Nearly every one of our elders has passed on, and I am now one of the elders. I can recall only those things that a 6-year-old will remember. There are so many stories, but I will relate only those few listed below in the hopes that anyone who reads this, will try to place themselves in my position of defending myself as a real human and not as a phantom.

I can remember when my brother was born in 1956 and the Coast Guard came too late to assist in the birth, so my dad delivered him. I recall the sick horses that the oil company abandoned without any food and we did not know what to feed them. My Mom decided we would take care of them. She helped us bring them back to good health by feeding them seaweed and old soft potatoes that had been buried in the sand (for preservation) from the year before. Everyday we tended those poor sick horses. When they were well again, Dad taught us to ride them bareback. Mine was Snake Eye, and my younger brother and sister had Blue Boy and Silveretta. Dad trained those horses to walk around and around our large house. One even liked to open the door and come into the windbreak. Then someone from the oil company returned to the village and wanted to take the horses away.

Sometimes I close my eyes and let my mind drift to the beauty of the interior of the small Russian Orthodox Church, the icons later stolen and burned. We played in the old, red school building, finding chalk pieces to write with on the large, worn out blackboard as we pretended to be in school. Mom took us on picnics to the beach, crossed the small river to pick berries on the mountain, taught us how to catch salmon and hang them to dry.

One of my Mom’s most exciting accomplishments was shooting and killing a large Kodiak grizzly bear that had been stealing our dry fish off the rack.

On one particularly hard winter, we did not have any left from what was then called a “Winter Grubstake,” for an Easter dinner, except for a little flour, some lard, salt and rice.

My dad went hunting to see if he could get some ptarmigan or a caribou for our Easter dinner. While he was gone, Mom mixed some flour with water and lard and had we kids roll it very thin. She cut it into rounds and poked holes in it, which she sprinkled with salt, then baked in our wood stove oven. She told us those were called “crackers,” and I have never eaten better since. All that day, Mom taught me the Lord’s Prayer by making me repeat it over and over. Very late in the evening, dad came home with one skinny ptarmigan. Mom was so happy and everything was wonderful. Mom plucked, cleaned and chopped that tiny, little bird into littlest pieces and made curried ptarmigan with lots of gravy. This was served with our special crackers and boiled rice. And I was beaming with pride to recite the Lord’s Prayer for Dad at dinner.

To this day, I try to have ptarmigan for dinner every Thanksgiving and Easter. It is now a tradition for my family to go hunting for ptarmigan every Thanksgiving. This might not mean much to anyone else, but those ptarmigan have a way of preserving my culture and reminding me that I belong to a group of people who once were with us. Today we are known as a “Lost Tribe”, but some of us who actually lived in Kanatak still exist, no matter how lost others might consider us to be. I am thankful and blessed to have been born an Aleut woman, raised in Alaska and to be an American.

Trained Survivalist Now Missing For Two Months in Alaskan Wilderness

A Wisconsin survivalist has gone missing in the Alaskan wilderness after he set out on a five-month hike through the state’s backcountry.

Alaska State Troopers are searching for 31-year-old Thomas Seibold of Three Lakes, who had planned to stay in the northwest Alaskan backcountry through October. He had booked a flight home to Wisconsin on Nov. 11, which he never made.

Seibold, who works as an instructor at the Talking Drum Outdoor School, has not been heard from in nearly two months. He was last seen at the end of September by a woman he stayed with 30 miles north of the Alaskan village of Ambler.

Seibold arrived in Alaska in June after six years of survivalist training at the Talking Drum Outdoor School, which teaches American Indian values along with primitive hunting and gathering techniques.

At the start of his trip, Seibold stayed at an Alaska Native fish camp in the southeastern part of the state, and he later headed north from there.

Read more from this story HERE.

Murkowski, the Blame Game, and GOP Irrelevance

It’s hard to believe we are now two years removed from the historic 2010 election in which our senior senator, Lisa Murkowski, won a disputed write-in victory with one of the most vicious and underhanded campaigns of the modern era. I’m quite sure it would have made David Axelrod blush, that is, if he wasn’t involved.

That Murkowski triumphed in such a brazenly dishonest and cynical way is still shocking to my sensibilities, though I must confess that I always have been guilty of putting too much faith in my fellow man.

If that wasn’t bad enough, what came next should outrage every liberty-loving American and self-respecting Republican. Murkowski returned to Washington defiant and un-chastened, only to side with the defeated and discredited Barack Obama on every major piece of his lame duck agenda: ‘Don’t ask, don’t tell’ allowed gays to serve openly in the military for the first time in American history (over the objections of an overwhelming majority of service men and women in the field); The Dream Act would have allowed millions of illegal aliens to be granted amnesty, providing ‘anchors’ for millions more; The START Treaty unilaterally disarmed American weapons in the face of a growing nuclear threat the world over; and the tax compromise that struck down a permanent extension of the Bush era tax cuts. Fiscal cliff, anyone?

Murkowski was the only Republican to vote for all four pieces of legislation. But she didn’t stop there. She continued her ‘war on the Republican party’ by obstructing efforts to cut federal spending. Planned Parenthood funding was apparently an indispensable government expenditure, and was NPR, etc. Paul Ryan’s budget was too extreme. Tea Partiers were out-of-touch absolutists. The Republican Party was engaged in a ‘war on women.’ Radical activist judges could not be opposed. And the debt ceiling negotiations had to be given over to the appropriators. Just let the President pretty much spend as much as he wants. Yep, that’s our senior senator.

In siding with Barack Obama, Murkowski offered bipartisan legitimacy to a president who was essentially down for the count. Had he plowed forward to pass his agenda without some Republican support, it would have only dug him in deeper. But Lisa Murkowski is for nothing, if not for a hand out. So she offered her hand to Obama and helped him back onto his feet.

For almost two weeks now, conservatives have sat by and listened as luminaries from the Republican establishment have bloviated about how tea party insophisticates, social conservative morons, and Ron Paul libertarians are to blame for the epic failure of their golden boy, one Willard ‘Mitt’ Romney.

The Anchorage airwaves have been filled with talk of ‘adult conversations’ that must take place with the above mentioned villains, replete with sneers and bony fingers pointing in every direction, except in the mirror. Fact is, Anchorage talk radio is populated almost exclusively with Murkowski supporters. And for the record, not one has offered to sit down and have that ‘adult conversation’ since election night.

Just last week, a Murkowski groupie pontificated in the Anchorage Daily News about those embarrassing social conservatives and their outdated obscurantism. She even suggested that they (we) should be kicked to the curb for a new, and presumably more enlightened, center-left alliance. The all-new ‘Murkowski Republican Party'(good luck with that).

Just when I thought we were starting to move past the blame game, imagine my astonishment last night to stumble unto yet another missive in the mainstream press about the ‘civil war’ raging inside the Republican Party. I expect that coming from the likes of Rove, Jesmer, Schmidt, and their ilk.

But this time it wasn’t the supercilious Karl Rove, or the ubiquitous hung-over punditry inside the beltway still tipsy from months of hitting on the Romney Kool-Aid. It was none other than the nameless, faceless eunuchs inside the United States Senate who wished to be identified only as ‘Republican Senators.’ Sounds officious, doesn’t it? (If you’re going to wage war on us, at least come out of the shadows and show your face.)

Their agenda: ‘Read my lips; no more Todd Akins!’

The hubris of such a statement hardly even needs commentary. Yet it betrays their utter lack of even a nodding acquaintance with reality. The folks they so despise are, none other than the very ones who offered them the trust of elective office, only to be kicked to the curb when folly had run its full course.

Click HERE for the powerful conclusion.