Watch: Joe Miller Wins Crowd at the Alaska Family Action Debate

IMG_1972

Eagle River, Alaska. August 5, 2014 – Joe Miller demonstrated at the Alaska Family Action debate on Monday why he has strong grassroots support among conservatives in the state. Miller drew contrast with the other candidates on the issues of amnesty, life and same-sex marriage.

The debate moderator, Tom Minnery – President of Citizenlink, questioned Miller concerning his definition of amnesty. Miller stated that it includes giving the benefits of citizens—a pathway to citizenship–to those who entered our country illegally. He pointed out that Mead Treadwell supports a pathway to citizenship, and Dan Sullivan is backed by big amnesty proponents including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and Senators John McCain and Susan Collins. Sullivan did not refute that amnesty money is behind his campaign, nor did he take the opportunity to state clearly his views on amnesty. Treadwell affirmed he does support a pathway to citizenship for illegals, but he conveyed as long as illegals didn’t get a “free pass” and “paid a penalty,” that is not amnesty.

Concerning the right to life, Miller noted he is the only candidate endorsed by Alaska Right to Life and both of his primary opponents blocked pro-life ballot initiatives during their terms in office. Sullivan and Treadwell stated their positions required them to follow the law, and Roe v. Wade is the law of the land. Miller pointed out Treadwell had previously said the Constitution protects life from conception. He then asked, “Was your oath to the Constitution or to the Supreme Court?” Treadwell declined to respond.

Miller stated both his opponents supported Lisa Murkowski in 2010, who is a pro-abortion senator. Minnery also made the audience aware of Lisa Murkowski and Mark Begich’s recent vote for the Women’s Health Protection Act, which seeks to expand abortion availability nationwide.

Minnery, asked the candidates whether they had any exceptions to their pro-life stand. Sullivan stated he supports exceptions for rape and incest. Treadwell supports an exception for the life of the mother. Miller responded, “I don’t think we ought to be talking about about exceptions, we ought to be talking about life. We save every life we can…We protect those liberties God has given us. The foremost of which is life.” That principle applies to saving the life of the mother, if both cannot be saved. Miller pointed to the example of pro-life advocate Rebecca Kiessling, as one who was conceived in rape who would not be among us, if that exception were to be followed.

He also offered the example of a family supporting the campaign, whose adopted son, Aaron, was the result of the rape of a teenage girl. Miller said, “Why are we going to punish the sons and daughters for the fathers’ sins?” Aaron is now grown-up, with four children of his own, director of sales for their family business (which filed an amicus brief in the Hobby Lobby case.) “These are real life stories. You talk to Aaron, he would say this is a real world issue. This is me standing here flesh and bone. Why would you punish me and my right to life for the sin of another?…” Miller’s remarks on this issue drew perhaps the strongest applause and approval from the crowd during the debate.

On the topic of same-sex marriage, both Treadwell and Sullivan seemed to hedge on their support for traditional marriage, stating they would uphold the Alaska law. Sullivan went on to say that “it is an issue that is very fluid right now…” Treadwell said it is a “sacrament of the church” and that government should not be regulating it or “baptism either.” Miller made clear he supports traditional marriage: “It is the foundation of culture. It is our civilization” and “something government should encourage.”

“Joe Miller once again turned in a winning debate performance,” said Miller campaign spokesman Randy DeSoto. “He is the only true conservative in the race able to unite the Reagan coalition of traditional values and fiscal conservatives.”

Joe Miller is a husband, father, grandfather, combat veteran, and advocate of Constitutional liberty who believes in individual rights, private property, free markets and the sanctity of human life.

Miller Slams Obama's Unconstitutional Decision to 'Act Alone' on Border/Immigration Crisis and Use of Taxpayer Dollars to Fly Illegals to Alaska

10438981_866143176730895_688184825868931881_nToday, Joe Miller denounced President Obama’s plan to “Act alone” to address the nation’s border crisis, as yet another lawless act by a lawless administration. He also called out the President for using taxpayer dollars to fly illegals from the U.S.-Mexican border to Alaska and destinations throughout the United States.

“We are a nation of laws, and once again President Obama somehow believes he is above the law. He must be held to account,” said Miller. “The fact that this President finds it inconvenient to work with Congress, as the Constitution provides, does not mean that he has the authority to rule like a dictator. Now the media is reporting the Administration is flying illegal immigrants from Texas to Alaska on the taxpayer dime. Outrageous!”

Miller concluded, “The President swore an oath to faithfully execute the laws of the land and to protect and to defend the Constitution. He is not keeping his oath. The only remedy left to the people is to impeach him.”

Greg Anderson on AK Senator Debate

0 (88)I just watched the July 15th Alaska Republican U.S. senate debate that was in Homer.

I am still a firm Joe miller supporter.

As a middle aged guy who has some life experience, I listen to my gut as I listen to words.

My gut says, and this is just my impression from seeing one debate:

Dan Sullivan is probably an effective administrator and skilled executive type. I believe he has good experience working in government, and can effectively play the game. I think that he would be able to work in the political arena and get things done, but what things? His dedication to the constitution and founding principals did not come across as an overriding mindset. At first glance it seems as though he would be another luke warm politician willing to play the game of compromise. —–More of the same, but certainly better than Begich.

Mead Treadwell also said what is probably compulsory rhetoric in this election, about standing against government overreach etc. But again these came across as an “also ran” philosophy. Oddly considering his disdain for outside control, he supports the law of the sea treaty. He touts economic benefits to justify the forfeiture of our sovereignty, passing off control to some far off and unfriendly unelected central authority. This is the short sightedness we need to be rid of. —–More of the same, but certainly better than Begich.

Joe Miller by contrast seems to have the constitution and founding principles as core beliefs. The anchor that his positions are tethered to. Joe seems willing to win or lose standing on those principles (as evidenced by the 2010 campaign). Joe is not a perfect human. Joe is not a polished politician. I like that he is not a polished politician though.—-Unique willingness to take stands both constitutionally and fiscally. We need more like him.

We as Americans are at a crossroads. Do we deliberately steer right and adhere to what made us a nation and a people? Or do we just lazily keep on keepin on, electing more of the same who will gently and comfortably compromise us further into fundamental transformation? Do we send (and re-send) politicians who promise us free stuff, or short-term economic benefits for our state while dismantling who we are and thus ruining our future well being?

There are times of specific need in which we seek out leaders with specific skills or traits to meet those needs, and right now is no exception. Right here right now, at this critical crossroads in American history, I think we need to elect leaders with an authentic constitutional conservative core as their foremost trait. To me, that appears to be Joe Miller.

Go Joe!

Feds Fly Unaccompanied Minors to Alaska (Hopefully they brought winter gear…)

Photo Credit: AP

Photo Credit: AP

As unaccompanied minors continue to illegally cross the Texas-Mexico border, President Obama’s Health and Human Services (HHS) has been quietly releasing them onto U.S. soil. A total of 30,340 unaccompanied minors have already been released from federal custody and placed into foster homes, according to HHS’ Office of Refugee and Resettlement (ORR). While many migrants have been released in border states like Texas and California, others have been set free in Alaska.

A spokesman from HHS confirmed to Breitbart Texas that as of July 7, five unaccompanied minors were released in Alaska. “Between January 1 and July 7, 2014, a total of five minors were discharged from the Unaccompanied Alien Children program to sponsors in Alaska,” the spokesman said.

The trip from McAllen, Texas–where the current border crisis is occurring–to Anchorage, Alaska is a nine and a half hour flight. This is almost double the time it would take to fly the migrants back to their home countries in Central America; a flight from McAllen to El Salvador takes just over five hours, according to Google Maps.

Read more from this story HERE.

‘That Face!’ Rep. Don Young Allegedly Strong-Arms House Staffer

Read more from this story HERE.

Electability

Photo Credit: The Daily Signal

Photo Credit: The Daily Signal

What about “Electability”? There’s been talk about this lately in regard to candidates on a federal and state level, and now local Kenai Peninsula Borough assembly members down to local City Councilmembers in Homer. Electability is defined as “capable of, or having a reasonable chance of, being elected, as to public office.” Electability is a well used strategy in the political world. It is used in both the Republican and Democrat Parties.

The Party or Establishment (Establishment is defined as a visible dominant group or elite that holds power or authority in a nation or organization) often comes out and backs a candidate as “Electable”. And when threatened by a candidate, the Establishment will often portray a candidate as having a lack of “Electability”, using that as a reason to not vote for someone. This is often done before the primary election, claiming that a particular candidate will not be electable against whom they will run against in the general election.

But the Establishment does not have a great track record of determining “Electability”, or lack thereof. In previous races, Mitt Romney, John McCain and John Kerry were all deemed as being highly electable. But yet, they lost.

In my opinion, “Electability” sounds like the Establishment’s excuse for trying to persuade voters when a candidate’s positions on issues is threatening to the existing and often corrupt governments. For me personally, I choose not to be persuaded by other forces. Instead, I choose to vote my conscience and vote for candidates who stand for my individual rights and freedoms, and not more big government.

For more information, I encourage you to do your own research on this political strategy.

Miller: US Should Stop Benefits, Like Health Care, for People in Country Illegally

Photo Credit: AP / Mark Thiessen

Photo Credit: AP / Mark Thiessen

By The Associated Press.

Republican U.S. Senate hopeful Joe Miller says the U.S. should bill the governments of people who enter this country illegally for policing, housing, food and transportation.

Miller’s campaign Wednesday released a seven-point plan for addressing illegal immigration.

The proposal also calls for immediate completion of a fence along the southern border of the U.S. and stopping benefits, like health care, for people who are in this country illegally.

Read more from this story HERE.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Miller Outlines Seven-Step Plan to Address Border/Illegal Alien Crisis

Joe Miller outlined a seven-step plan today to address the growing crisis on our nation’s southern border.

“The crisis of illegal immigration we’re facing is not only unnecessary, it is being instigated by the Obama Administration,” said Miller. “It’s time we take some simple steps to ensure the integrity of our borders and the security of the American people.”

The seven-step plan consists of the following policies:

1. End all foreign aid to countries encouraging illegals to cross our borders.
2. Finish the border fence now.
3. Stop encouraging illegal entry with birthright citizenship.
4. Bill the governments of illegals for policing, housing, feeding, and transporting their citizens.
5. Implement E-verify now and fine companies for employing illegals.
6. End the Immigration and Naturalization Services (INS) lottery that gives citizenship to 55,000 random people every year.
7. Stop the endless benefits to illegals – healthcare, schooling, social services, etc. – which are a form of taxation on American citizens.

Earlier this week, Miller called on his Republican opponents to join him in calling for the President’s impeachment, in part due to Obama’s lawlessness on the amnesty issue. So far, his call has elicited no response.

Miller concluded, “With these seven, simple, common sense steps we could fix this problem once and for all. The crisis that the President and this Congress have essentially created is unconscionable. Promising a safe haven with many of the same benefits as citizens is unacceptable. It’s time for Congress not only to act with respect to fixing the problem, but also to hold Barrack Obama accountable.”

Fight Heats Up Over EPA Sabotage of Alaska Gold Mine

Photo credit: NPCA Photos

Photo credit: NPCA Photos

The Environmental Protection Agency is under fire for a preemptive strike against a massive copper and gold mine in Alaska, where hundreds of billions of dollars and thousands of jobs are at stake.

The controversy centers on Pebble Mine, located 200 miles southeast of Anchorage. It is the largest deposit of copper and gold in North America.

But environmental groups and fishermen, worried about the impact to the world’s most abundant salmon run in Bristol Bay, fought the mine from the beginning.

“It was people from Alaska that requested the EPA come in and take action,” said Tim Bristol, of Trout Unlimited in Anchorage. “We just don’t feel like we’re getting our concerns heard by the state of Alaska.”

The EPA did act, using the 1972 Clean Water Act for the first time ever to stop a mine before the owners even came out with a detailed plan.

Read more from this story HERE.

Yet Another High-Profile Conservative Demands Obama’s Impeachment

Photo Credit: Western Journalism

Photo Credit: Western Journalism

By B. Christopher Agee.

As calls for impeachment proceedings against Barack Obama increase among prominent Republicans, it is clear the proposition is one that resonates with a large number of Americans. A pair of polls this week shows that at least one-third of the public wants to see him removed from office.

The trend is so obvious that even the White House has admitted that the pursuit of impeachment hearings is a distinct possibility.

Alaska Senate hopeful Joe Miller added his name to the growing list of impeachment proponents in a statement released earlier this week. Echoing the sentiment of fellow Alaskan Sarah Palin, he suggested that the inaction of the Obama administration regarding the ongoing border crisis is an issue that must be addressed swiftly and decisively.

“The truth is, what we are facing with respect to the massive influx of illegals is not only a rule of law issue,” he said; “it is a public health risk and a threat to our national security.”

Miller asserted that Obama must be held accountable, suggesting that impeachment would be the most effective solution.

Read more from this story HERE.

____________________________________________________________________

Photo Credit: AP / Mark Thiessen

Photo Credit: AP / Mark Thiessen

Senate Hopeful Joe Miller Calls For Obama’s Impeachment, Blasts Mark Begich Over Border

By David McCabe.

Joe Miller, who is running in the Republican primary for the opportunity to challenge Sen. Mark Begich (D-Alaska), has called for President Barack Obama’s impeachment, his campaign said this week.

“Sarah Palin is right; it’s time to impeach this President for dereliction of duty, selectively enforcing the law, and usurping powers that the Constitution does not authorize,” he said in a press release. “He is willfully undermining the rule of law and creating chaos.”

Palin, the former Alaska governor who shot to prominence as Sen. John McCain’s presidential running mate in 2008, has repeatedly called for Obama’s impeachment this summer.

Earlier this month, Palin penned an op-ed for Breitbart.com, saying that the crisis on the U.S.-Mexico border was “the last straw” and should be cause for Congress to bring articles of impeachment against the president. But the rhetoric around impeachment has also incorporated many of the issues conservatives have used to attack Obama throughout his two terms, including questions about the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks on the diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya.

Read more from this story HERE.

Ohio Business Could Cause Headache for Alaska Senate Candidate

Photo Credit: US News

Photo Credit: US News

By David Catanese.

An Ohio business accused of overcharging the federal government for contract work could pose a headache for Alaska Republican Senate candidate Dan Sullivan.

Sullivan, who is in the midst of a primary fight for the opportunity to challenge Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska, this fall, has family ties to RPM International, a Medina, Ohio, paint company that paid a $65 million settlement to the federal government last year to resolve charges it didn’t provide the government with price discounts it gave to other customers.

According to the Justice Department, RPM, and its subsidiary, Tremco Inc., failed to provide “current, accurate and complete information” about “changes in discounts … and to pass those discounts on to government customers” between January 2002 and March 2011.

“In addition, Tremco allegedly improperly marketed generic products as a superior line of the same product and used a defective adhesive formula in its roofing systems,” the Justice Department charged.

RPM was founded by Sullivan’s grandfather and is now operated by his brother.

Read more from this story HERE.

__________________________________________________________________

Photo Credit: Facebook / Dan Sullivan

Photo Credit: Facebook / Dan Sullivan

Will A Scandal Surrounding This Company Bring Down A U.S. Senate Candidate?

By B. Christopher Agee.

RPM International, a corporation that owns paint supplier Tremco, recently reached a settlement with the federal government that resulted in the Ohio-based company parting with $65 million.

Among the charges levied against RPM and its subsidiary company is the allegation that it charged the government one price for products and services while offering significant discounts for other clients. The corporation was also accused of portraying “generic products as a superior line of the same product” and using “defective adhesive formula,” the Department of Justice explained.

The government entered into a contract with the company to complete jobs including roofing work on hospitals and prisons.

Though he is seeking a U.S. Senate seat thousands of miles away in Alaska, Republican Dan Sullivan is now facing scrutiny as a result of RPM’s actions. Not only is his brother now in charge of the company his grandfather started; RPM is also a heavy donor to Sullivan’s campaign.

According to reports published earlier this year, RPM started a political action committee to support the candidate; and several high-ranking officials within the corporation have donated significantly to his reserves.

Read more from this story HERE.