Vietnam Says That China Is Mislabeling Products as Vietnamese to Avoid U.S. Tariffs

/0 Comments/in , /by

Vietnamese officials say China is intentionally mislabeling its products as “made in Vietnam” to avoid American tariffs, and have ordered offices to more aggressively examine products’ certificates of origin.

Chinese firms first export products to Vietnam, then change the labeling on packages before exporting the goods to the United States, Japan or Europe, they said.

“Dozens” of products have been identified, Hoang Thi Thuy, a Vietnamese Customs Department official, told state-run media, and goods like textiles, fishery products, agricultural products, steel, aluminum, and processed wooden products were most vulnerable to the fraud. . .

“It will sabotage Vietnamese brands and products and it will also affect consumers. We could even get tariff retribution from other countries, and if that happens, it will hurt our economy,” Foreign Minister Pham Binh Minh told the Vietnamese National Assembly last week.

Vietnam does not have any legal requirements for certification of the “Made in Vietnam” label. The country’s current regulations require that goods be produced partly or completely in Vietnam, but does not provide a mechanism for determining the veracity of the label. (Read more from “Vietnam Says That China Is Mislabeling Products as Vietnamese to Avoid U.S. Tariffs” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

America’s One Big Mistake in Afghanistan – Fighting the Wrong War

/0 Comments/in , /by

In his June 23, 2019 Military Times opinion article “America’s three big mistakes in Afghanistan,” Brig. Gen. Donald C. Bolduc (Ret) correctly noted three factors, which contributed to the pending U.S. defeat in Afghanistan:

“Misstep No. 1: The expansion of US forces and the introduction of large conventional units into the vast expanse of Afghanistan;

Misstep No. 2: Allowing the Taliban resurgence to occur in Afghanistan-2003-2009 and 2014-2019;

Misstep No. 3: Our inability to manage, let alone solve, Afghanistan’s illicit narcotics trade.”

Yet, none of those three could have been corrected or decisive while ignoring the geopolitical realities upon which an effective strategy is based.

That geopolitical reality is Pakistan, which has never shared the same objectives for Afghanistan as the U.S. and from which American strategic “mistakes” originated, those beyond the self-inflicted wounds of poor management and accountability, well-documented by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction.

American military leaders consistently violated the most fundamental of strategic principles, ones taught at every U.S. war college, know your enemy and do not mistake a war for something that is alien to its nature.

The war in Afghanistan is not an insurgency. It is a proxy war being waged by Pakistan against the U.S. and Afghanistan.

Both the Pentagon and multiple U.S. political administrations have known from nearly the beginning of the conflict that an American victory in landlocked Afghanistan was impossible as long as Pakistan regulated the operational tempo by providing safe haven and support to its Taliban proxies and controlled the supply of our troops, critical factors which have never been adequately addressed.

Under such conditions, the application of counterinsurgency, which, I hasten to add, is a doctrine or collection of tactics, not a strategy, would ultimately be ineffective, whether executed by conventional or special forces. The same is true for counter-narcotics operations, where the trafficking of Afghan opium is largely occurring unimpeded through Pakistan.

Over nearly the entire course of the conflict, the U.S. supplied Pakistan with generous aid packages to bribe them from pursuing a course of action opposed to our own, but one Pakistan considered in its national interest. In essence, our leaders, through a combination of incompetence and indifference, allowed the United States to be defeated by Pakistan and paid them to do it.

Pakistanis now openly brag about it.

Shortly before his death in 2015, Lieutenant General Hamid Gul, the former head of Pakistan’s ISI, a committed Islamist and known as the “godfather of the Taliban,” said in an Urdu language television interview:

“One day, history will say that the ISI drove the Soviet Union out of Afghanistan with the help of USA and another sentence will be recorded that says the ISI drove the USA out of Afghanistan with the help of the USA.”

The Pakistani audience roared with laughter and applauded in approval.

The same pattern of duplicitous behavior by Pakistan has continued for seventeen years.

Late last year, during a Taliban attack on the Afghan provincial capital of Ghazni, large numbers of Pakistani nationals were found among the dead, presumably fighting with the Taliban. The bodies were subsequently returned to Pakistan.

In a recently released video, al Qaeda emphasizes its unity with Taliban and its role within the Taliban insurgency, as the jihadists, including Pakistanis, fight together to resurrect the Taliban’s Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.

And yet American political leaders and senior military officers have done nothing, preferring to remain puzzled or cynical as to why we have not won in Afghanistan.

Despite Pakistani duplicity, Taliban safe havens in Pakistan remained largely untouched.

Pressure was never applied to Pakistan’s pain points, its moribund economy and financial insolvency and the existential threat of ethnic separatism, in particular among Pakistan’s Baloch and Pashtun populations.

An American withdrawal from Afghanistan will only be a humiliating defeat, if the U.S. is forced into strategic retreat from South Asia because we do not have a plan in place to address the changing regional conditions in a post-U.S. Afghanistan.

Fortunately, you can find such a new strategic plan here.

(Published in full with the permission of the author, find the original posting HERE)
_________________________________________

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired US Army Reserve colonel, an international IT businessman and a veteran of Afghanistan, Iraq and a humanitarian mission to West Africa. He receives email at [email protected] and can be found on Twitter @LawrenceSellin.

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

First Poll of Democrats After the Debates Has Very Bad News for this 2020 Candidate (VIDEO)

/0 Comments/in , , /by

By The Blaze. One of the first polls to be released after the Democratic debates has very bad news for the presidential campaign of former Vice President Joe Biden, the current frontrunner.

The Morning Consult/FiveThirtyEight poll found that support for Biden had fallen by a precipitous 10 percentage points among likely Democratic voters.

41.5 percent of likely Democratic voters said they supported Biden’s campaign before the debate, but only 31.5 percent said they supported him after the debate. . .

CNN’s Van Jones said in a dispirited commentary that the debate was a “bad night” for Democrats and also for Biden.

“Maybe he already thinks he’s woke, he’s already there, he doesn’t have to keep learning and growing, we all have to keep learning and growing, on women’s issues, on racial issues, on immigration issues, that’s the whole point of the country, we try to become a more perfect union together,” Jones said to the CNN panel.

(Read more from “First Poll of Democrats After the Debates Has Very Bad News for this 2020 Candidate” HERE)

___________________________________________________________

Biden Sees Support from Democrats Slip 10 Points After Debate

By The Hill. . .The apparent decline in support comes after Biden was widely seen as having faltered, including engaging in a stark exchange with Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) over school busing.

Harris herself got a nearly 9 point bump, with 16.6 percent of Democrats saying they would support her after the debate, up from 7.9 percent before the events.

Other 2020 candidates had marginal increases or decreases. . .

Morning Consult and FiveThirtyEight surveyed, from June 19-26, 7,150 registered voters who say they are likely to vote in their state’s Democratic primary or caucus. That result has a margin of error of 1 percentage point. Then, June 27-28, 1,399 respondents who answered the first round of questioning were surveyed. That result has a margin of error of 3 percentage points. (Read more from “Biden Sees Support from Democrats Slip 10 Points After Debate” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Homeowner Fatally Shot Two Intruders — and Got Thrown in Jail for Criminal Possession of a Firearm

/0 Comments/in , /by

By The Blaze. Ronald Stolarczyk heard people climbing up the stairs leading into his Deerfield, New York, home last month, his lawyer told Syracuse.com. . .

“He said he was scared to death and thought he was going to die,” Wolber told Syracuse.com.

With that, Stolarczyk picked up a handgun from the kitchen counter and fired three to four shots at the intruders, his lawyer noted to the outlet, adding that two people fell down the stairs to the bottom.

Stolarczyk then called 911, Wolber told Syracuse.com.

A police officer responding to the call found Stolarczyk at the end of the driveway and told him to put the gun down, the outlet said, citing a felony complaint. (Read more from “Homeowner Fatally Shot Two Intruders — and Got Thrown in Jail for Criminal Possession of a Firearm” HERE)

____________________________________________________________

Lawyer: Homeowner Who Killed 2 ‘Was Scared to Death, Thought He Was Going to Die’

By Syracuse. . . .The two intruders he shot and killed have been identified as Patricia Anne Talerico, 57, and Nicholas A. Talerico, 27, of Utica, according to New York State Police. The aunt and nephew were burglarizing the home at 6110 Walker Road in Deerfield when they were shot by the homeowner, police said. . .

The weapon was a 38-caliber Rossi revolver, according to the court papers.

Wolber said his client didn’t know the two intruders, or know what they were after in his house, or if they thought it was abandoned.

Stolarczyk lived in the home with his parents, but they have both died, Wolber said. His dad owned the handgun, and Stolarczyk said he recently discovered it in the home and never registered it himself, he said.

Stolarczyk, 64, has been charged with criminal possession of a firearm, a Class E felony, police said. (Read more from “Lawyer: Homeowner Who Killed 2 ‘Was Scared to Death, Thought He Was Going to Die’” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Lincoln’s Legacy: Nothing Can Stop President Trump from Asking Citizenship Question on 2020 Census

/0 Comments/in , /by

Judges do not have the power to veto abstract political policies or laws; they merely render judgment to individuals with proper standing before the courts where individualized rights were implicated. That is why they have as much power to dictate the drafting of U.S. Census questions as I do or as the president of Afghanistan does. Thursday’s decision presents President Trump with the perfect opportunity to “remind” the courts of their “impotence,” as Justice Antonin Scalia predicted would happen before he died.

I’m often asked if the president should pull ‘an Andrew Jackson’ on the courts and put them in their place. My response is that it is the courts who are pulling an Andrew Jackson, except, unlike a president, they lack the power to enforce their usurpations.

Drafting a census, much like giving out visas and work permits to illegal aliens or controlling the border, is an executive function. Unlike convicting individuals charged with crimes who face the loss of life and liberty, which is eminently within the province of judicial power, courts don’t have power over abstract political questions dealing with broad executive powers affecting the whole of the people. As such, when a president applies these policies in concert with the Constitution and the law, he is not “defying a court” the same way he would if, say, he directed the Justice Department to incarcerate or execute John Doe for a crime after a court vacated his conviction.

The census ruling is the superlative opportunity for Trump to begin reclaiming inherent executive authority from rogue court opinions designed to create broad political rules outside of their jurisdiction. This case has all of the key elements for doing so: the Constitution, statute, history and tradition, are all on his side and there is no tangible, individualized harm to specific plaintiff that would result from Trump continuing to ask the citizenship question on the census. Moreover, Trump is merely overturning a policy from the previous administrations and reverting back to our long-standing history. No new ground is broken.

Once the president does it this time, he will then have an easy avenue to do so every time a district judge mandates he continue a discretionary policy of his predecessor.

To begin with, each branch of government has the responsibility to use its powers in accordance with their oath to the Constitution, irrespective of what other branches are doing. That is literally what is meant by separation of powers. The same way a judge can grant relief to an individual plaintiff when he believes the Constitution compels such a result, irrespective of the laws of Congress or the policies of the executive branch, the president must also execute policies in concert with the law, irrespective of what a court rules for an individual plaintiff.

But even if we were to accede to the dangerous notion that the courts are the sole and final arbiter of the Constitution, there were at least five justices (including Chief Justice John Roberts) who conceded the following points [contrary to some lower court judges]: The Constitution grants the president authority to ask the citizenship question, statute grants the president such authority, the question has been the very essence of the census for most of our history, including our founding, and the president fulfilled the dictates of the Administrative Procedure Act by not implementing the new policy in an arbitrary and capricious manner. In fact, Roberts acknowledged that the decision “was reasonable and reasonably explained, particularly in light of the long history of the citizenship question on the census.”

It’s just that Roberts joined four other justices in concocting a rationale that something just doesn’t smell right with the stated rationale of the Trump administration for making the change, even though the insinuated alternative rationale, even in Roberts’ own mind, would not inhibit Trump’s ability to execute the most foundational power of drafting the census.

Statute [13 U. S. C. §141(a)] says very clearly that the secretary of commerce “shall, in the year 1980 and every 10 years thereafter, take a decennial census of population. . . in such form and content as he may determine, including the use of sampling procedures and special surveys” [emphasis added]. Statute [13 U. S. C. §221] also compels everyone to respond to any of those questions he may determine with the exception of questions about religious affiliation.

It’s an open and shut case. The president must proceed with his plans. Courts don’t draft census surveys the same way Roberts himself admitted they don’t draw election maps, which themselves are determined by such census information. That is inherently one of the most political questions by nature in our system.

The only thing the president would be advised not to do is encroach upon the core judicial power, even when they are wrong, to punish individuals who receive a favorable court ruling. For example, if people decide they don’t want to respond to the census, under current law, the executive branch can fine them $100. Those individuals have the right to go to court and have them apply this Supreme Court ruling to grant relief to their property ($100) for not filling out that particular question. That is the check the judiciary has on the executive branch. But likewise, the president can absolutely mail out forms with the question on it because the drafting of such documents is inherent executive authority.

Trump has the opportunity to follow in the legacy of Abraham Lincoln on this exact point. The Supreme Court in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) ruled that the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which barred slavery in most of the new territories, violated the constitutional property rights of Mr. John F. A. Sanford.

During the sixth debate with Stephen Douglas during the 1858 race for Senate in Illinois, Lincoln asserted: “Judge Douglas understands the Constitution according to the Dred Scott decision, and he is bound to support it as he understands it. I understand it another way, and therefore I am bound to support it in the way in which I understand it.”

What does that mean? Does it mean “defying” the court in the way Andrew Jackson did actively chasing out the Cherokee Indians from Georgia following the Worcester v. Georgia opinion? That certainly would have been justified since Chief Justice Roger Taney declared black citizens to be property and not worthy of citizenship. But that’s not what Lincoln was even driving at.

Lincoln observed that courts can adjudicate individual cases, but if they seek to use those rulings as a way of setting political policy across the nation, it should never be regarded as a “political rule” to be “binding on the members of Congress or the President to favor no measure that does not actually concur with the principles of that decision.”

Thus, while Lincoln said during the debate that he would not take away Mr. Sanford’s “slave” because he got a court order, he would not treat it as a political rule for executive and legislative powers governing the nation.

Despite the Dred Scott decision, Lincoln as president signed laws prohibiting slavery in the territories, and, as head of the executive branch, he not only declined to treat black people as property, he treated them as citizens and issued them official government documents, such as passports. Those issues are within the province of the other branches of government, who must interpret the Constitution as they understand it.

How rich it must have been for Roger Taney to be reminded of his own impotence when he was compelled to administer the presidential oath of office to Abraham Lincoln on March 4, 1861. He was forced to listen to Lincoln’s inaugural address when he rejected the notion that “the policy of the Government upon vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court the instant they are made in ordinary litigation between parties in personal actions.”

The man who wrote his slavery opinion based on “the state of public opinion in relation to that unfortunate race” was forced to eat crow before his very eyes by giving the Bible to the Great Emancipator.

The only point about which Justice Scalia was wrong in the gay marriage case when he predicted his fellow judges would one day be “reminded of our impotence,” is that there are no longer any men like Lincoln left to issue that reminder. (For more from the author of “Lincoln’s Legacy: Nothing Can Stop President Trump from Asking Citizenship Question on 2020 Census” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Minnesota’s ‘Nice Culture’ Is Now a Sanctuary for Transnational Gangs and Drugs

/0 Comments/in , /by

The North Star State is known for its “Minnesota nice” culture and the small city of Stillwater is known to be quiet and peaceful. The last thing town residents expected was to find a body of a badly injured woman at the hands of an illegal alien gang member lying on one of their streets, but that is exactly what happened on Sunday, June 9, according to the 39-year-old victim. It’s part of a broader problem plaguing the state thanks to the largest metropolitan area being a sanctuary for repeat criminal alien offenders who are incentivized to return after being deported.

Last week, thanks to the recovery of the victim and court documents, local Twin Cities media has gotten the background on the woman found lying in the street in a pool of blood by an Uber driver on June 9. According to the criminal complaint, 32-year-old Angel Sardina-Padilla and 23-year-old Luis Alfredo Cortez-Mendoza, both allegedly members of the Surenos 13 street gang, held the female victim captive in her St. Paul apartment on June 8 and threatened her and her roommates with a metal tool heated up over the stove.

The pair of gang members then drove her around until the next morning when Sardina-Padilla, the alleged ringleader, ordered Mendoza to shoot her. He fired three shots, one striking her in the chest, knocking her down in the street until she was found by the Uber driver at 2:38 a.m. on June 9.

Mendoza reportedly told police that he feared he’d be killed for not following orders when he was arrested on June 10. Sardina-Padilla was arrested June 18. Bail for both of them was set at $2 million in separate court appearances. Mendoza was charged with attempted first-degree murder for the benefit of a gang, attempted second-degree murder for the benefit of a gang and kidnapping for the benefit of a gang. Sardina-Padilla was charged with aiding and abetting on all three counts.

The first question that popped in my mind when seeing the reference to the Surenos 13 gang when following this story last week was that it’s likely these suspects are here illegally. I was the first person to send an inquiry to Immigration and Customs Enforcement about the immigration status of Mendoza last Tuesday, and indeed I was told he is an illegal alien and that there is a detainer lodged against him, a fact that was not mentioned in a single local media report for the first few days of the story. There is no detainer for Sardina-Padilla, which presumably means he is a natural-born or naturalized citizen.

“On June 10, 2019, deportation officers with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) placed an immigration detainer with Washington County (Minnesota) Jail on Luis Alfredo Cortez-Mendoza, 23, an illegal alien from Mexico, following his criminal arrest on charges of attempted murder,” said Nicole Alberico, spokesman for ICE in a statement to CR last week. “Cortez-Mendoza was removed to Mexico four times in April 2015.”

It wasn’t until late on June 18 that the Star Tribune reported that Mendoza was an illegal alien previously deported several times to Mexico. No other reporter followed up on the immigration status.

This is yet another example of a high profile violent crime committed by an illegal alien that went unreported in the local media. We’ve uncovered several high-profile DUI manslaughters in California where we were the first to inquire about immigration status and report the issuance of an ICE detainer, even though every local media report ignored the immigration aspect of the story.

This tragedy demonstrates how even small towns in the upper Midwest are not immune to transnational gang violence. While the victim in this case was found in Washington County, the alleged assailant lived in St. Paul, a known sanctuary city. So many illegal alien crimes and ICE operations to ensure they are not released after posting bond go unreported in the media. I only found out about this story from a local listener to my podcast.

Stories of violent transnational gang members committing murder or mayhem occur every day, but few trace the origins back to the border. Every day we see agents tied down dealing with mass numbers of illegal immigrants, it is a certainty that dangerous criminal gang members are getting through the border undetected. Mendoza’s ability to come right back four times in the same year is a testament to the border problem that will be ignored through much of the media coverage of this case.

The Twin Cities area is beginning to see many of the problems that plague the East Coast. Minneapolis has long been a sanctuary city. In 2003, the city prohibited its officers from inquiring about immigration status. In recent months, suburbs such as St. Cloud and St. Joseph declared themselves “welcoming cities.” Minneapolis has an entire “Sanctuary City Task Force” to help push back against federal immigration authorities.

More broadly, Hennepin County, the jurisdiction that encompasses the Twin Cities and holds one-fifth of Minnesota’s population, was listed by ICE’s Declined Detainer Outcome Report as a county that declines to honor ICE detainers. Hennepin County was listed for refusing to honor a detainer of a convicted Mexican meth dealer and weapons violator. It’s no surprise why the Minneapolis Star Tribune wrote a story “Mexican drug cartels turned Minneapolis into a meth hub.”

All of the deaths from gang activity, drunk driving, and drug trafficking emanating from sanctuary cities are all completely avoidable. They are either the result of an unsecured border allowing them to come in or reenter, or from sanctuary cities who release them even after being apprehended for a subsequent crime, or both. In April, Mark J. O’Gara, a 52-year-old father of 10 children, was killed in St. Paul while pulling out of his driveway. He was hit by a 19-year-old illegal alien from Honduras who was a recent beneficiary of catch-and-release who didn’t show up to his court case.

One thing is clear: as Democrats hold up pictures on the Senate floor of illegal aliens who die of natural causes and blame it on Border Patrol and ICE, they will never show the pictures of victims of illegal aliens. Nor do they show the pictures of all those Americans saved from an unknown number of crimes criminal aliens would have committed had they not been deported. Both of them would likely fill the Senate gallery from floor to ceiling. (For more from the author of “Minnesota’s ‘Nice Culture’ Is Now a Sanctuary for Transnational Gangs and Drugs” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Effort to ‘Hamstring’ President Trump’s War Powers Against Iran Fails in Senate

/0 Comments/in , /by

An amendment designed to limit President Donald Trump’s ability to use military force against Iran failed in the Senate on Friday after failing to meet the 60-vote threshold for legislation.

After a lengthy 10-hour vote, the resolution fell short of the necessary 60-vote threshold for passage.

The amendment was authored and put forward by Sen. Tom Udall, D-N.M., who said on the Senate floor Thursday that the president’s “reckless diplomacy” amid recent tensions with the Islamic dictatorship “is dangerously reminiscent of the run up to the war with Iraq.”

Voting on the amendment — which would have required President Trump to seek congressional approval before taking military action against Iran — began at 5 a.m. and was held open through the afternoon in order to allow for some senators with early flights to leave for their weeklong Independence Day recess and others to return from this week’s Democratic debates in Miami. This ended up setting a record for longest Senate vote in modern history.

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., warned on the floor Thursday that the “timing couldn’t be worse” for the amendment, given the current state of affairs, adding that the amendment was redundant to the provisions in the Constitution and would send the wrong message.

“The redundancy is actually damaging,” Rubio explained. “It’s only going to reinforce this belief among some in the regime that they can go further than they can.”

The senator went on to say that the amendment “increases the chance of war” because it could encourage the Iranian regime to “miscalculate” and attack thinking that the United States is constrained.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., called the amendment “dangerous” Friday, saying that it would “hamstring the executive branch from reacting quickly in a crisis and prevent the U.S. from taking decisive action.”

“We don’t want war with Iran,” said Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., in a statement. “I agree with the president’s restraint, but if Iran threatens to attack again, we should leave all options open.”

The only Senate Republicans who voted for the measures were Mike Lee, Utah; Rand Paul, Ky.; Jerry Moran, Kan.; and Susan Collins, Maine. Paul and Lee are longtime proponents of reclaiming Congress’ constitutional war powers from the executive branch. Last year, Lee was one of the key sponsors of a high-profile Senate amendment to restrict the U.S. involvement in the ongoing conflict in Yemen over constitutional concerns.

“The Constitution is clear: Only Congress can declare war,” said Paul in a statement about the amendment. “For too long, Congress has largely ceded the most important of its responsibilities to presidents of both parties.”

On Monday, President Trump hit Iran with new sanctions in response to Iran’s shooting down an American drone last week.

“The Supreme Leader of Iran is one who ultimately is responsible for the hostile conduct of the regime. He’s respected within his country,” the president said of Monday’s sanctions. “Sanctions imposed through the executive order that I’m about to sign will deny the Supreme Leader and the Supreme Leader’s Office, and those closely affiliated with him and the office, access to key financial resources and support.”

Trump signed off on the sanctions days after he said he called off a retaliatory airstrike against Iranian assets in response to the drone being shot down. (For more from the author of “Effort to ‘Hamstring’ President Trump’s War Powers Against Iran Fails in Senate” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Previously Deported Asylee and Child Molester Indicted on Child Porn Charges

/0 Comments/in , /by

Fontana Herald News reports that a previously deported child molester has been apprehended by authorities and was indicted on Thursday by a federal grand jury on charges of child pornography as well as illegal re-entry into the United States.

José Ramón Aguilar-Moreno, 50, was deported in 2003 after being convicted of sexually abusing a child. However, Aguilar-Moreno was only allowed in the country at that time because he was granted asylum by U.S. authorities in 2000. “Aguilar-Moreno illegally entered the United States in 1986 and in 1995 he applied for relief from removal and requested asylum in the United States,” the paper notes.

The Salvadoran national then re-entered the United States after his removal in 2003 but was discovered in 2018 in Fontana, California. Authorities found him because “Aguilar-Moreno used an alias, ‘Abel Aguilar,’ and posted the videos on Facebook, which later notified the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, court documents allege,” according to Fontana Herald News. On Thursday, he was officially indicted. . .

Last Wednesday, the United States Border Patrol arrested a previously deported child molester after catching the pervert sneaking into the United States with five other illegal aliens who were traveling as a family unit in Tucson, Arizona. (Read more from “Previously Deported Asylee and Child Molester Indicted on Child Porn Charges” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

New: Must Watch Exposé of the Muslim Brotherhood with Key Organization Leaders

/0 Comments/in , /by

Filmmaker Ami Horowitz has just released a brilliantly done 15-minute video, exposing leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood in their own words as they continue their mission started in the 1920s of creating a global Islamic caliphate throughout the entire world. Their target, according to key Muslim Brotherhood leaders as well as experts interviewed by Horowitz, is a complete takedown of the United States of America.

The Muslim Brotherhood began in Egypt “as a religious and social organization. It as over the years metastasized to become the largest global Islamic organization in the world with branches in dozens of countries,” Horowitz explains.

“It has representatives in various governments and leadership in social and charitable organizations around the world. Its stated goals are to spread Islam and the word of the Quran throughout the world with the ultimate objective being the creation of a global Caliphate,” the American filmmaker notes.

Thus, Horowitz traveled to “Cairo, Beirut, Istanbul, and elsewhere to meet with Brotherhood leaders and to get a better sense of their plans and goals.”

“The Muslim Brotherhood has aggressively tried to expand their global influence by sending an unknown amount of proxies into countries around the world,” Horowitz explains. Many of these “proxies” operate based on a key memo written by Muslim Brotherhood leader, Dr. Mohammad Akram Nadwi.

(Read more from “New: Must Watch Exposé of the Muslim Brotherhood with Key Organization Leaders” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

More Bad News Hits Joe Biden’s Presidential Campaign

/0 Comments/in , /by

Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden’s presidential campaign has taken another hit as one of Biden’s top fundraisers has announced that he can no longer support Biden.

“Tom McInerney, a veteran San Francisco based lawyer, informed Biden’s team on June 20 that he can no longer help him raise campaign cash to compete in the 2020 presidential election,” CNBC reported. “While McInerney is the first financier to publicly withdraw his support after Biden’s controversial round of comments, the loss is significant because it could be a harbinger of further defections.”

McInerney pulled his support from Biden after Biden’s past comments praising racist Democrat segregationist senators surfaced earlier this month and after Biden flipped on repealing the Hyde Amendment.

“I don’t think he did well last night,” McInerney said of Biden’s debate performance.

Biden suffered a massive blow during Thursday night’s Democratic presidential debate of MSNBC from Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), who ripped Biden to pieces over race.

(Read more from “More Bad News Hits Joe Biden’s Presidential Campaign” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE