Fox Guest: Michelle Obama Got Smollett Charges Dropped, Here’s Why

A Wednesday Fox Business segment labeled Jussie Smollett’s exoneration a “travesty of justice” and sought to confirm conspiracy theories Michelle Obama called in “favors” to get his charges dropped by Cook County prosecutors.

Fox Business host Stuart Varney opened his Tuesday segment declaring “the influence and power of liberal elites” was on full display in Chicago this week as Illinois prosecutors waived 16 charges against the Empire star. Self-proclaimed libertarian and Sean Hannity correspondent Lawrence Jones III touted unfounded and baseless claims former First Lady Michelle Obama “made some phone calls” to have the charges dropped in order to distract Americans from the disclosure of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation into President Donald Trump.

Although Republican Senate House Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was behind the blocking of the full Mueller report, the Fox crew nonetheless accused Democrat politicians — and their wives — of corrupting Cook County prosecutors.

“We know that Michelle Obama’s chief of staff made some phone calls,” Jones said on Fox Business Wednesday. “I would also note that the reason why they released this now is because after the Trump investigation was concluded they knew during the news cycle this was the perfect time to release this.” The frequent Fox News guest cited Chicago Sun-Times, which reported Tina Tchen, a Chicago attorney who formerly worked for Obama, had previously asked Cook County lead prosecutor Kim Foxx to coerce the Chicago Police Department into turning the investigation over to federal authorities.

(Read more from “Fox Guest: Michelle Obama Got Smollett Charges Dropped, Here’s Why” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

GOP Legislator Prays to Jesus for Forgiveness Before State’s First Muslim Woman Swears In

State Rep. Stephanie Borowicz was on the ninth “Jesus” of her opening prayer in the Pennsylvania statehouse when other lawmakers started to look uncomfortable.

Speaker Mike Turzai, a fellow Republican, glanced up – but Borowicz carried on, delivering a 100-second ceremonial invocation that some of her colleagues decried as an offensive, divisive and Islamophobic display shortly before the legislature swore in its first Muslim woman.

“God forgive us – Jesus – we’ve lost sight of you, we’ve forgotten you, God, in our country, and we’re asking you to forgive us,” Borowicz said, followed by a quote from the Bible’s second book of Chronicles that implores God’s followers to “turn from their wicked ways.” Then she praised President Donald Trump for his unequivocal support of Israel. . .

As the prayer reached a crescendo, at least one member shouted objections. Turzai, standing behind her, looked up again and nudged her elbow, prompting her to quickly conclude the address. Afterward, the protests only grew louder.

“It blatantly represented the Islamophobia that exists among some leaders – leaders that are supposed to represent the people,” Rep. Movita Johnson-Harrell, the newly sworn-in Democrat who is Muslim, told the Pennsylvania Capital-Star on Monday. “I came to the Capitol to help build bipartisanship and collaborations regardless of race or religion to enhance the quality of life for everyone in the Commonwealth.” (Read more from “GOP Legislator Prays to Jesus for Forgiveness Before State’s First Muslim Woman Swears In” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

China Warns U.S. Against Push to Label Pakistan-Based Jihadi a ‘Global Terrorist’

China and its all-weather ally Pakistan are reportedly furious with the United States for pushing a draft resolution this week to outlaw the Pakistani leader of an anti-India, U.S.-designated terrorist group directly to the United Nations Security Council, bypassing established procedures. . .

Responding to the recent U.S. move, Geng Shuang, a spokesman for China’s foreign ministry, reportedly urged the United States to “act cautiously” and avoid “forcefully” pushing the draft resolution.

“This is not in line with [the] resolution of the issue through dialogue and negotiations. This has reduced the authority of the committee as a main anti-terrorism body of the UNSC, and this is not conducive to the solidarity and only complicates the issue,” Geng added. . .

China and Pakistan are closed military and financial allies. While Pakistan refuses to condemn the reported mistreatment of Muslims in China’s Xinjiang province, Beijing has repeatedly defended Islamabad against accusations of serving as a sanctuary for terrorists.

According to the U.S. government, China faces a terrorist threat from jihadis training and operating in the Afghanistan-Pakistan region, which houses the highest concentration of terrorist groups in the world. (Read more from “China Warns U.S. Against Push to Label Pakistan-Based Jihadi a ‘Global Terrorist'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Trump Threatening to CLOSE Border

President Donald Trump is threatening to close parts of the U.S.-Mexican border as record numbers of migrants surge through the legal loopholes created by Congress and judges.

“CONGRESS MUST CHANGE OUR WEAK IMMIGRATION LAWS NOW … If Mexico doesn’t immediately stop ALL illegal immigration coming into the United States throug [sic] our Southern Border, I will be CLOSING….. ….the Border, or large sections of the Border, next week,” he said in a series of three tweets Friday morning.

Border officials are ramping up their estimates for the number of migrants who will grab the opportunity created by Congress. Predictions for 2019 have climbed from 900,000 to 1.2 million during the last few weeks.

(Read more from “Trump Threatening to CLOSE Border” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Federal Judge Strikes Down Ban on Firearm Magazines

By The Blaze. A federal judge struck down a California ban on magazines that are capable of housing more than 10 rounds because he said the law violated the Second Amendment.

Judge Roger T. Benitez of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California issued the judgement on Friday afternoon and totally invalidated the ban. . .

“Plaintiffs contend that the state’s magazine ban thus cannot survive constitutionally-required heightened scrutiny and they are entitled to declaratory and injunctive relief as a matter of law,” he explained. “Plaintiffs are correct.” . . .

“Judge Benitez took the Second Amendment seriously and came to the conclusion required by the Constitution,” said NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris Cox.

“The same should be true of any court analyzing a ban on a class of arms law-abiding Americans commonly possess for self-defense or other lawful purposes,” he concluded.

(Read more from “Federal Judge Strikes Down Ban on Firearm Magazines” HERE)

__________________________________________________

Federal Court Strikes Down Magazine Ban

By The Daily Caller. Judge Benitez continues, “The statute hits at the center of the Second Amendment and its burden is severe. When the simple test of Heller is applied, a test that persons of common intelligence can understand, the statute fails and is an unconstitutional abridgment. It criminalizes the otherwise lawful acquisition and possession of common magazines holding more than 10 rounds – magazines that law-abiding responsible citizens would choose for self-defense at home. It also fails the strict scrutiny test because the statute is not narrowly tailored – it is not tailored at all.”

The ruling is another legal blow to gun control efforts in the state. Back in July, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit ruled in the case to uphold a lower court’s ruling to block the enforcement of California’s restriction on the possession of firearm magazines that hold 10 rounds or more. . .

California has banned selling or purchasing magazines with more than a 10-round capacity since 2000; however, anyone who possessed these magazines prior to the law was grandfathered in and were allowed to keep the magazines. Three years ago, voters approved a measure to do away with the provision and the NRA filed a lawsuit. (Read more from “Federal Court Strikes Down Magazine Ban” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

‘Unplanned’ Star Obliterates Alyssa Milano on Pro-Life Bill

Ashley Bratcher, star of the recently-released anti-abortion movie “Unplanned,” wrote a response to actress Alyssa Milano after Milano suggested that Hollywood might boycott Georgia over a bill banning abortion after a fetal heartbeat is detected, according to Deadline Hollywood.

Bratcher, who plays former Planned Parenthood executive turned pro-life advocate Abby Johnson in the movie, was nearly aborted herself and resides in Georgia, so she has some strong feelings on the topic.

“Well Alyssa, let me make something very clear to you,” Milano wrote. “In Georgia, we care just as much about being pro-life as being pro-film. We don’t believe in putting a price tag on the value of a human life. Our brave leaders have stepped up to say enough is enough, we will no longer sit idly by as innocent lives are taken by the thousands each day.” . . .

Milano attacked the bill as “the most anti-woman bill of its kind in the country” in a guest column for Deadline Hollywood, and suggested that if the bill passes, Georgia could lose some of the many film and television projects that boost its economy.

“To Georgia’s leaders: You have worked hard to showcase your state and bring in filming projects that have had a multiplier impact on your state’s economy, but these projects are not a given,” Milano wrote. “I urge you to think hard before making Georgia a state that is not welcoming of women. I urge you to defeat HB 481 and continue to be “The Hollywood of the South.” (Read more from “‘Unplanned’ Star Obliterates Alyssa Milano on Pro-Life Bill” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Rand Paul Blocks Resolution Calling for Release of Mueller Report

By Townhall. Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) blocked a resolution Thursday that called for the public release of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report after Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), a 2020 presidential hopeful, asked for unanimous consent in the Senate for the resolution. The measure passed the House by a 420-0 vote last month.

“We still have not seen the report,” Klobuchar said on the Senate floor. “I have urged the Department of Justice to release the report, and the administration should not delay in producing the report to Congress.”

Sen. Paul objected to Klobuchar’s motion, arguing that “we all want transparency,” but he would like the communications of officials in the Obama administration to be released first, including those of former CIA Director John Brennan and Former FBI Director James Comey, in relation to the beginning of the Russia probe. (Read more from “Rand Paul Blocks Resolution Calling for Release of Mueller Report” HERE)

______________________________________________________

Rand Paul Accuses Obama Administration of Sending ‘Spies’ Into Trump’s Campaign

By Washington Examiner. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., accused the Obama administration’s intelligence community of having “spies” infiltrate the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.

Paul claimed that a “source” shared with him the Justice Department’s attempts to retrieve information on the Trump campaign during the Obama administration. In particular, Paul alleged that former CIA Director John Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and FBI Director James Comey “sent spies” to get information on the Trump campaign after they received the so-called Trump dossier.

The document contains salacious information about President Trump and his relationship with Russia.

“Well, my source tells me that the intelligence community, Obama’s intelligence community, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, they were frustrated because they had this Russian dossier but nobody believed it was real,” Paul said during an interview on Fox News on Thursday.

Former British spy Christopher Steele composed the dossier after being hired by opposition research firm Fusion GPS. A lawyer for the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee had hired the firm to conduct anti-Trump research. (Read more from “Rand Paul Accuses Obama Administration of Sending ‘Spies’ Into Trump’s Campaign” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Another Poll Shows Ocasio-Cortez’s Approval Ratings Are Straight Trash

She may be a fighter. She may be a darling of the far left of the Democratic Party. Her followers may like how she takes the fight to the GOP, even if she’s hitting way above her weight class. But Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (D-NY) approval ratings are trash. Now, is indicative that her political career is toast? It’s still way too early, though some of these figures are not solid for someone in a solidly Democratic district. For now, let’s just say that she’s probably going to be re-elected, barring any more pushes that cost her state jobs and economic activity a la Amazon purge (via CNBC):

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has grown less popular in New York – even among Democrats – following Amazon’s decision to scrap its planned offices in Queens.

Thirty-one percent of registered voters in the state view the freshman House Democrat favorably, while 44 percent have an unfavorable view, according to a Siena College poll released Monday. In January, 34 percent of New York voters viewed Ocasio-Cortez favorably, versus 29 percent who had an unfavorable opinion, a Quinnipiac University poll found.

[…]

Ocasio-Cortez’s support has dipped among key constituencies since January. Her net favorability — positive minus negative ratings — among Democrats fell to +17 in March from +46 in January. In New York City, she had only a +6 rating in March, down from a +32 in January. Ocasio-Cortez represents parts of the city’s boroughs of Queens and the Bronx.

(Read more from “Another Poll Shows Ocasio-Cortez’s Approval Ratings Are Straight Trash” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

More ‘Refugee’ Teens Caught in MS-13 Sting

Amid the rash of school shootings in this country, we are engaged in a national discussion over combatting violence among our youth. Is there really a reason to import hundreds of thousands of young males from the most dangerous countries with the strongest gang culture when we already have our own problems? Is this what the American people voted for? Well, that is exactly what is happening, as we continue to resettle self-trafficked illegal alien teens from Central America, many of whom join gangs.

Last week, I reported that three MS-13 members who were arrested in Maryland for stabbing a rival gangster and burning the body were resettled as refugees under the false pretenses of being brought to this country as “unaccompanied minors.” This week, six MS-13 gangsters were indicted on charges of conspiring to commit two murders in Long Island. In the first case, Kevin Zuniga, Jose J. Portillo, and Kevin Mejia Sandoval allegedly planned to murder a fellow gang member who was actually cooperating with law enforcement. In the second case, according to Suffolk County District Attorney Timothy D. Sini, these individuals conspired to work with Gerver A. Chinchilla Perez, Emerson Hernandez Escobar, and Rafael Hernandez Elias to murder a rival gang member “by shooting him with a firearm they planned on purchasing, butchering him with a machete, or by burning him to death.”

According to an ICE official, two of the individuals were settled in the country as UACs, but the source declined to tell me which ones, out of fear of violating a privacy policy.

Three of the suspects were identified by law enforcement as “homeboys,” which means they are designated leaders in the U.S. taking orders from gang leaders in El Salvador. That is what has happened to our country. We have now opened our gates to transnational gangs to operate freely in our country, often treating them as refugees!

Long Island and Maryland became hot spots for MS-13 activity during the surge of Central American teens in 2014. The current surge is making that one look like child’s play, with record numbers of teens coming in, both individually and with families. Aside from the numerous teens being given de facto amnesty who will likely join gangs when they are settled in our country, as we saw from the 2014 wave, there are numerous known gang members coming in while Border Patrol is tied up with what is essentially social work. According to Border Patrol, 800 gang members were apprehended so far this year, a 50 percent increase from last year. And it’s very likely, given that most resources are now diverted to processing the invasion rather than deterring it, most gang members who strategically enter far from points of entry are never apprehended. Consider the fact that Border Patrol has had to shut down all its secondary checkpoints in New Mexico to deal with the processing of amnesty for Central Americans.

It’s truly frightening to consider the harm to Americans and our public safety that will result in the months and years to come from this wave that has not yet crested. Anyone who is settled as a UAC is treated as a refugee and cannot be deported until they actually commit a crime. We have needlessly brought in countless tens of thousands of ticking time bombs in our schools and communities.

Mark Morgan, who was chief of Border Patrol during the end of the Obama administration, explained the concern as follows: “As a police officer working in South Central Los Angeles, and years later, as an FBI supervisor of a MS-13 Gang Task Force, I saw firsthand the transition of countless young kids into the world of gang membership. The reasons why are varied but have remained consistent: status, recognition, protection, intimidation, brotherhood, and profit through criminal activity. The young immigrant population is increasingly susceptible and vulnerable to all the pull factors and drivers. They are often uneducated, unskilled, and lack a sense of belonging and purpose. This makes them a perfect target for gang recruitment.”

Yet to this day, the Senate has refused to clarify that refugee status doesn’t apply to those who are self-trafficked by illegal alien families already here. Nor has the administration even asserted that this is the proper interpretation of the statute. The American people, through Congress, have never voted to let these people in. The statute was designed to protect victims of gangs who are kidnapped across our border, not those who are part of the gangs gaming out our system with the help of other illegal relatives, who themselves should be deported.

In 2013, Judge Andrew Hanen of the Southern District of Texas accused Obama’s DHS of “successfully complet[ing]” the “goal of the conspiracy” of drug smugglers to smuggle people over the border on behalf of parents “at significant expense” to taxpayers. What the Trump administration continues to do because one district judge said so, Hanen actually said is illegal. A private citizen would be prosecuted for delivering teens smuggled in to illegal alien family members:

Hanen went on to say that the Flores agreement expired after five years, and even under Flores, it is inconceivable that government would be forced to complete a criminal conspiracy and deliver teens to illegal aliens who paid for the trafficking.

Now, after months of listening to a California judge who says the opposite, potentially tens of thousands of volatile and troubled youth from Central America will be flooding our schools in the coming months. It’s a recipe for disaster, for more gangs and drug trafficking. Thomas Homan, who was director of ICE during the original 2014 UAC crisis, says, “Many of the gang members ICE has arrested the past few years entered the US at the southern border as part of a family unit or as an unaccompanied alien child UAC. As a matter of fact, a gang operation in NY last year entitled Operation Matador, which targeted MS-13 gang members, showed that approximately 40 percent of those arrested illegally entered the U.S. as part of a family unit or as a UAC. Many that entered the U.S. were already gang members or soon became gang members after arriving in the U.S.”

Mark Morgan, who after years of serving in communities with existing MS-13 populations later became chief of Border Patrol several years into the UAC crisis, saw this ticking time bomb at the front end, before they were released:

“As chief of the Border Patrol, I would tour the detention facilities filled to capacity with unaccompanied minors, 17 years of age or younger, who had illegally entered the country. Alone and without any parents or guardians. As I looked as these groups, I saw both hardened young men as well as vulnerable and lost youth. With every encounter, I walked away wondering how many would be lured into joining a gang. The odds were not in their favor, as they were released into a city somewhere in the U.S., never to be heard from again.” (For more from the author of “More ‘Refugee’ Teens Caught in MS-13 Sting” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Border Patrol Stops Prosecuting First-Time Crossers in Key Sector

A completely unprecedented border migration surge notwithstanding, The Wall Street Journal reports today that U.S. Border Patrol will no longer prosecute first-time border crossers in West Texas’s pivotal Del Rio Sector. According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection data from last month, the Del Rio Sector saw an 82% year-over-year increase in unaccompanied alien children apprehensions.

Per The Journal:

Instead of being charged with a misdemeanor, most single migrants, or adults traveling without children, apprehended crossing the border illegally for the first time will face swift deportation without criminal charges. The official said Border Patrol has ceased charging those illegal immigrants amid the increasing number of families crossing the border and seeking asylum and an uptick in other criminal cases that have left them with no detention space.

As The Journal notes, Del Rio Sector prosecutions initially increased during the Bush administration — the 43rd president oversaw border agents who made about 68,000 arrests in the Sector during the federal government’s fiscal year 2005. But arrests in the Sector have not eclipsed 25,000 in a given fiscal year since 2007. . .

As The Daily Wire has previously reported, Customs and Border Protection data on border activity last month were so eye-gouging as to leave The Washington Post’s national security reporter specializing in immigration enforcement and drug trafficking with only one appropriate word: “Bonkers.”

(Read more from “Border Patrol Stops Prosecuting First-Time Crossers in Key Sector” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE