People Are Furious About What CNN Just Threatened to Do to the Reddit User Behind Trump’s WWE Video

CNN sparked a backlash Tuesday night after threatening to identify the Reddit user who claimed to have created a meme of Donald Trump body-slamming the CNN logo that the president later shared on Twitter.

CNN targeted Reddit user HanAssholeSolo because he took credit for the video and apparently had a history of making racist and anti-Semitic remarks online.

CNN reporter Andrew Kaczynski opted not to identify the user “because he is a private citizen who has issued an extensive statement of apology, showed his remorse by saying he has taken down all his offending posts, and because he said he is not going to repeat this ugly behavior on social media again.”

But Kaczynski then added that “CNN reserves the right to publish his identity should any of that change,” seemingly indicating that CNN would identify the user if he repeats his “ugly behavior” on social media. That sentence was widely interpreted as a threat. Kaczynski, who disputed that characterization, seemed especially upset that the Reddit user “was someone who shared an image of CNN reporters’ face with Stars of David next them.” (Read more from “People Are Furious About What CNN Just Threatened to Do to the Reddit User Behind Trump’s WWE Video” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

The Tragic Case of Charlie Gard Highlights the Importance of Parental Rights

The tragic case of Charlie Gard, the British infant who will soon be taken off life support, has exposed the scale of the malfunction in the British family court system.

This is a court system driven by ideological professionals and overseen by compliant judges who have lost their moorings in Judeo-Christian values.

Charlie is a 10-month-old infant who suffers from an extremely rare and debilitating genetic disease and has already suffered significant brain damage. He cannot move his arms or legs and cannot breathe without the assistance of a ventilator.

On June 8, the United Kingdom Supreme Court permitted the hospital to withdraw such support to enable Charlie to die with “dignity,” in its own words.

However, Charlie has the benefit of two loving and devoted parents who were prepared to do all in their power to preserve the life of their son. They found a leading medical practitioner known as Dr. I, who is a professor of neurology at a mainstream medical center in the United States, and who was willing to facilitate and oversee the provision of nucleoside therapy for Charlie.

Dr. I accepted that there was only a remote possibility of any success.

Due to the generosity of the public, to whom an appeal was made, the parents have sufficient funds to pay for Charlie to go to the U.S. for treatment, and it would be possible to transport him under medical supervision across the Atlantic for such treatment.

Nucleoside is a new therapy with uncertain results, but it was, at least, a hope for Charlie. However, Judge Justice Francis held:

Accordingly, the entire highly experienced UK team, all those who provided second opinions and the consultant instructed by the parents in these proceedings share a common view that further treatment would be futile. For the avoidance of any doubt, the word “futile” in this context means pointless or of no effective benefit.

The judge refused to permit the parents to seek further treatment in the U.S. and his decision thus ensured that Charlie would die in the U.K.

This case is not about the merits or demerits of nucleoside therapy for Charlie, but the power of a judge to overrule the decision of custodial fit parents on what they deem best for their own child.

Common sense would indicate that any chance of success—no matter how remote—is better that no chance of life.

Judges in the Family Division of the High Court and professional social workers daily make incomprehensible decisions of removing children from loving families, deciding on what is best for a child, or causing more damage than needed by acting under Section 1 of the Children’s Act 1989, which gives the Court jurisdiction to do as it will under the fig leaf of stating that the “welfare of the child shall be the paramount consideration.”

Thus, it was in Charlie’s interest to die, and be denied a “no-cost” experimental treatment that arguably could have improved his condition.

Behind many decisions of the Courts are the acts of (poorly educated) social workers, educational psychologists, and local government officers dancing to the tune of political correctness, or at the political direction of their masters.

In recent years, there have been cases of Christian parents being denied the ability to foster a five-year-old child because of their religious views (the child could potentially be homosexual).

In another case, a family was initially disqualified by reason of their support for British independence from the European Union, which the Court later reversed. There is also the scandal of inaction by the same professionals in cases of the rape of numerous girls because many of the perpetrators had Asian (Muslim) identity.

In a recent U.K. case, the social workers backed the right of a four-year-old boy to transition to a girl. Fortunately, the British judge had some common sense and recognized that this was harming the child.

In the case of the Christian foster carers denied registration because of their beliefs, the government-backed Equality and Human Rights Commission argued it was their responsibility to protect vulnerable children from becoming “infected” with Judeo-Christian ethics on sexual conduct.

The reader should be aware that they are not mistaken in what they have just read, the Commission did in fact use the term “infected.”

It is time that courts in the civilized world recognized the fundamental rights of parents to rear their children, and that the state is a neutral actor that should not pursue social agendas under the guise of the “best interests of the child.” The state should only interfere where there is clear exposure of harm to a child (violence, abuse, or neglect).

There must be a clear jurisdictional limitation to the actions of a court—namely that the parent is always a better decision maker than anyone else, be it a social worker, hospital, or court.

The views of a custodial fit parent must be respected in substance, not merely in the form of platitudes. The parents of Charlie have suffered a great wrong and the consequences will affect many other decent parents.

This arrogance of the elites, who presume to know what is the best for a child over those parents who are deemed too emotive, too uneducated, or who have the wrong religious views, is not a peculiar British problem. This problem that alive and well in the U.S. as well, and must be countered wherever it is found. (For more from the author of “The Tragic Case of Charlie Gard Highlights the Importance of Parental Rights” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Mainstream Media Now Advocating ‘All Citizens’ Spend Time in Prison as ‘Service’ to Country

Corporate media achieved a new level of absurdity last week, when Jesse Ball, writing for the Los Angeles Times, suggested every American be required to spend a stint behind bars every ten years as a veritable guarantee to improve conditions of incarceration in the United States.

In the piece titled, “Everyone should go to jail, say, once every ten years,” Ball writes,

A notable demand that is made upon the citizens of the United States of America is that of jury duty. Although many despise, hate and avoid it, there is a general sense that the task is necessary. We believe a society is only just if everyone shares in the apportionment of guilt.

To this demand of jury duty, I would like to add another, and in the same spirit. I propose that all citizens of the United States of America should serve a brief sentence of incarceration in our maximum-security penitentiaries. This service, which would occur for each person once in a decade, would help ensure that the quality of life within our prisons is sufficient for the keeping of human beings.

Without foreknowledge on length of stay and other details, citizens would languish behind the same bars as convicted criminals under Ball’s proposal — albeit in a section separated from offenders, assumedly not to confuse jailers and inmates, or endanger anyone serving ‘incarceration duty.’

But Ball misses the point — feeding the elephant in the room of overcriminalization of daily life, excessive laws, and, worst by far of all, the normalization of incarceration as conditional to the American way of life — lecturing all of us to walk a mile in the shoes of the convicted rather than declaring the brazen failures of the Injustice System evidence enough, itself, for dismantling the whole dysfunctional mess.

After all, according to the Prison Policy Institute, the United States now cages some 2.3 million of its roughly 326.5 million total people — the largest per capita incarcerated persons of any nation on the entire planet.

An interplanetary traveler would logically conclude it a prison nation — or, at least, one astonishingly rife with thugs, murderers, thieves, and worse.

Even the more law-and-order, authoritarian among us could see the flaws evident in a system claiming freedom, while locking away proportionally more than even the dictatorial fascist regimes our troops putatively combat.

While undoubtedly posited from a place of compassion as a plea for ethics in imprisonment, Ball’s somewhat tongue-in-cheek proposal unfortunately evinces the frequency with which Band-aids are applied as a fix for gaping structural flaws which should otherwise condemn the system to demolishment.

But, worst of all, this proposition capriciously normalizes the American Incarceration State.

Consider how those 2.3 million souls wound up stuffed into the cramped confines of the nation’s myriad federal, state, and local facilities; or, worse — judging by a voluminous body of anecdotal accounts — one of the altogether notorious prisons-for-profit, managed by private corporations intent only on thrift in housing its human commodities to save the State some pennies.

Most of the convicted behind bars have committed nonviolent crime — but moralizing on personal vice and legislation enacted sanctimoniously against substances have exploded the nation’s prison population to alarming proportions.

A court or jury decision of guilt in no way can be characterized on par with ‘laws’ governing ethics and human rights — for, if a candid observation of inmate records were ventured, a sweeping sum could be said to have landed in prison by violating the State’s prohibition on the cannabis plant.

And not violently so.

Forgetting for a moment ‘the law is the law,’ to describe a society as just, which chooses to not only cement unjust ideas into law, but imprison violators of aberrant legislation — particularly in cases of medicinal use — must be the pinnacle of hypocritical pomposity, if not the telltale heart of a dying empire.

Sure, forcing (on penalty of prison?!) yet more behind bars to prove how base the conditions behind bars might actually assist the vocal calling to improve conditions behind bars, but if so many have been locked there for reasons only justifiable for the violation interned in the print of legal tomes, the plan is an exercise in pure futility.

Unless it simply normalizes prison life as a veritable inevitability — might as well prepare for the eventuality some offensive chunk of life will be wasted rotting between the torrid walls of a prison cell.

The irony, palpable.

No, we do not need to send the relatively innocent to prison to endure torturously foul food and varying degrees of inhospitability to prove locking people in cages does nothing to curb crime — indeed, the opposite is arguably true.

It’s the system, broken — not people’s compassion.

Juries convict based on flawed evidence, evidence omitted by technicality, and an embarrassing list of other inexcusable conditions accumulated on the books over centuries — and more laws and regulations find their way to the ledger every day.

They’re creating additional ways to make you a criminal — so, in that sense, Ball might be onto something.

‘Get ready for prison, dear young people, by the time you’re an adult, there won’t be a thing you can do without somehow breaking the law,’ the writer unintentionally asserts between the lines.

“I wonder,” Ball continues, “once all you citizens of the United States are passing in and out of prison on a regular basis, will the conditions there not seem singularly urgent? Just picture congressmen, priests, stock traders, truck drivers, people of every faith, color, description, all for once sharing in something.”

Sharing in the memory of peering out from inside prison walls isn’t conducive to solving the issue of mass incarceration.

Scrapping unjust, unethical, amoral, and otherwise ludicrous laws governing every conceivable aspect of daily life, however, is. (For more from the author of “Mainstream Media Now Advocating ‘All Citizens’ Spend Time in Prison as ‘Service’ to Country” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

America, ‘Racist’? How Obama Duped U.S. With 1 Dangerous ‘Lie’

Think America is growing more racist than ever?

That’s because you’ve been duped by the left – and especially by Barack Obama, who used the “lie” of racial grievances for his own personal gain and ultimately divided America.

“Black Americans got worse under Barack Obama than any other time in the history of America,” said WND exclusive columnist Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, author of “The Antidote: Healing America from the Poison of Hate, Blame and Victimhood,” during a July 3 appearance on Fox News’ “Tucker Carlson Tonight.”

“If it was a race issue, why didn’t it get better? We had a black president,” Peterson said. “The races were more divided as a result of Barack Obama because he used them for his own personal gain and didn’t care about them” . . .

“We have a president who is going to keep his word. He’s keeping his word by putting America first. He doesn’t care what color you are, whether you’re male or female. He loves us, he loves the country,” Peterson told Carlson Monday evening. (Read more from “America, ‘Racist’? How Obama Duped U.S. With 1 Dangerous ‘Lie'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Top Vatican Official: Satan Hurling ‘Anti-Creation’ at God

When God created the world, the Bible says He saw it was “very good.” A natural order had been established. But mankind fell to sin and death, and that order was destroyed . . .

Christianity is being driven from public life. Homosexuality, transsexuality and other “identities” and sexual activities that were once considered perverse are now regarded by elites as core to Western civilization.

Among the younger generation, more evangelicals are accepting of same-sex marriage. And the only time liberals seem willing to side against sexual degeneracy is when it means aiding the cause of the Muslims who are colonizing the West in ever-growing numbers.

To traditionally minded Christians, it may seem like the world has gone insane. Now, one of the Vatican’s intellectual leaders, Cardinal Carlo Caffarra, has declared Satan launched the “ultimate and terrible challenge” in a form of an “anti-creation” being constructed around the world.

In an address to the Rome Life Forum, Cardinal Caffarra identified Satan with the drive to deny the truth within the heart of man. He specifically said two innovations are core to this “anti-creation” – abortion and homosexuality. (Read more from “Top Vatican Official: Satan Hurling ‘Anti-Creation’ at God” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Cops Can’t Find Any of These Violent Muslim Migrants in the U.S.

On June 19, Aisha Ibrahim became the latest Muslim migrant to jump bail after being charged with a violent crime . . .

Ibrahim is not the only Somali refugee facing violent criminal charges who has failed to appear for court and is currently unaccounted for.

Abdirhman Noor of Aberdeen, 24, also a Somali refugee, was living in Aberdeen, South Dakota, when he was charged with two counts of attempted murder in February when he allegedly shot two men outside an apartment complex. He was released on bond and jumped bail. He remains unaccounted for, said a Brown County employee in the office of State’s Attorney Chris White on Friday . . .

In another case, a Saudi Arabian student is wanted for killing a 15-year-old girl in Oregon last year and is now a fugitive after skipping bail . . .

Perhaps the most disturbing case of missing Islamic migrants in America is that involving the disappearance of at least 45 Afghan soldiers over the last two years from U.S. military bases. (Read more from “Cops Can’t Find Any of These Violent Muslim Migrants in the U.S.” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Donald Trump’s Presidency Has Not Increased the Number of Americans Applying for Canadian Citizenship

Despite claims by furious Trump opponents that they would leave the country if he won the presidency, Canada hasn’t proved as many citizenship applications as might be expected.

The country’s did receive an uptick of 66 per cent in applications from January-April 2017, but that only meant an average of 400 people per month rather than the previous year’s 264.

And those figures are still down from highs of 2011 – the middle of the Obama administration – when 564 Americans a month were trying to become Canadian, the National Post reported.

The paper looked at figures from from 2007 to April of this year, obtained from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada.

The figures don’t include Americans who have moved to the country in the hope of becoming permanent residents, or those who already live there. (Read more from “Donald Trump’s Presidency Has Not Increased the Number of Americans Applying for Canadian Citizenship” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Federal Agents Just Paid a Visit to Kathy Griffin — and Grilled Her for Over an Hour

When Kathy Griffin posed for a photoshoot holding a fake decapitated, bloody head of President Donald Trump in June, she likely didn’t think about the wide-reaching implications of her so-called “joke.”

While her controversial stunt resulted in some serious professional consequences, it also earned her a lengthy visit from the U.S. Secret Service.

Secret Service agents reportedly tracked down Griffin and interviewed her in person for more than an hour. Further, the investigation into the bloody head debacle remains open.

(Read more from “Federal Agents Just Paid a Visit to Kathy Griffin — and Grilled Her for Over an Hour” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Trump Just Wished Everyone a Happy Fourth, and Deplorables Will Love the Song He Chose

President Donald Trump wished the country a happy Independence Day by sharing a video of a band and chorus performing “Make America Great Again.”

Trump shared the tweet just before 7 a.m. and captioned the video with a few hashtags related to the Fourth of July.

The video itself opens with a band playing in front of an American flag, and most people probably expected the band to play the national anthem or “God Bless America.” (Read more from “Trump Just Wished Everyone a Happy Fourth, and Deplorables Will Love the Song He Chose” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

North Korea Tested Intercontinental Ballistic Missile [Capable of Reaching Alaska], U.S. Officials Believe

North Korea fired its first intercontinental ballistic missile on Tuesday, military officials said, a significant step forward in Pyongyang’s weapons program and an escalation of a perilous nuclear standoff with the United States.

The United States condemned the test-launch, firing warning missiles and vowing to hold the regime accountable at the United Nations.

The ICBM, which is believed to be “two-stage,” officials said, would have a range of at least 3,500 miles and thus be able to reach Alaska.

The North Korean regime earlier Tuesday claimed that it successfully fired a long-range missile into the Sea of Japan, declaring itself a “proud nuclear state.”

“It is a major celebration in our history,” said an announcer on North Korean state television. North Korea “is now a proud nuclear state, which possesses [an] almighty ICBM rocket that can now target anywhere in the world.” (Read more from “North Korea Tested Intercontinental Ballistic Missile [Capable of Reaching Alaska], U.S. Officials Believe” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.