ISIS fanatics have executed 19 women for refusing to have sex with its fighters, a Kurdish official has said.
He claimed the women were being held hostage in Islamic State’s stronghold of Mosul, Iraq, which the terror group seized in June last year.
Meanwhile a UN envoy investigating Islamic State’s vile sex trade has said ‘girls get peddled like barrels of petrol’ and one can be bought by six different men.
She also verified a disturbing ISIS document which suggested the extremists sell the Yazidi and Christian women and children they have abducted, with girls aged just one to nine-years-old fetching the most money.
ISIS stormed the Sinjar district in northern Iraq last year and captured hundreds of women belonging to the Yazidi community, who the Islamists view as heretics. (Read more from “ISIS Executes 19 Girls for Refusing to Have Sex With Fighters” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00kathleenhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngkathleen2015-08-07 03:40:502015-08-07 03:40:50ISIS Executes 19 Girls for Refusing to Have Sex With Fighters
Oceanographers are studying whether ‘climate change’ is contributing to an unprecedented bloom of toxic algae that spans the Pacific Coast of the United States and Canada, raising health concerns and leading to multimillion-dollar income losses from closed fisheries.
The bloom, which emerged in May, stretches thousands of miles from the Channel Islands off the coast of Southern California to Alaska’s Aleutian Islands and has surprised researchers by its size and composition.
“It’s just lurking there,” Vera Trainer, research oceanographer with the Northwest Fisheries Science Center in Washington state, told Reuters on Thursday. “It’s the longest lasting, highest toxicity and densest bloom that we’ve ever seen” . . .
The runaway bloom of pseudo-nitzschia algae is believed to have been spawned in part by unusually warm ocean water along the West Coast that scientists have dubbed “the blob” . . .
The algae bloom has produced a profusion of a chemical compound called domoic acid, which accumulates in shellfish, anchovies and sardines exposed to it, and acts as a neurotoxin on higher orders of marine life, such as sea lions and birds, that feed on them. (Read more from “Massive Toxic Algae Bloom Reaches From California to Alaska” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-08-07 03:40:392015-08-07 03:40:39Massive Toxic Algae Bloom Reaches From California to Alaska
Boeing has been awarded a $6.6m contract to design a cheap, reusable mini shuttle that can launch military satellites.
The small, planelike craft is known as the XS-1 program—short for ‘eXperimental Spaceplane 1’, and could blast off in 2019 on its first test mission.
It is hoped the craft could quickly launch small satellites that could defend against the growing threat of Russian and Chinese space weapons.
XS-1 could ‘create a new paradigm for more routine, responsive and affordable space operations,’ according to DARPA, the military research arm heading the project.
The XS-1 is an airplane-like vehicle that can fly to the edge of Earth’s atmosphere and quickly boost small satellites into orbit, and then land, refuel, load up another satellite, and take off again within 24 hours. (Read more from “The X-37b’s Big Brother Revealed: Boeing Bags $6.6m Contract to Do This” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-08-07 03:40:282015-08-07 03:40:28The X-37b’s Big Brother Revealed: Boeing Bags $6.6m Contract to Do This
Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush share more than membership to political dynasties and Washington-establishment ideals. According to a new analysis of Federal Election Commission filings, 17 of the nation’s wealthiest citizens have donated to both Clinton’s and Bush’s presidential campaigns.
From the analysis, conducted by Vocative and The Daily Beast:
More than 60 ultra-rich Americans have contributed to both Jeb Bush’s and Hillary Clinton’s federal campaigns, according to an analysis of Federal Election Commission data by Vocativ and The Daily Beast. Seventeen of those contributors have gone one step further and opened their wallets to fund both Bush’s and Clinton’s 2016 ambitions.
After all, why support just Hillary Clinton or just Jeb Bush when you can hedge your bets and donate to both? This seems to be the thinking of a group of powerful men and women—racetrack owners, bankers, media barons, chicken magnates, hedge funders (and their spouses). Some of them have net worths that can eclipse the GDPs of small countries.
(Read more from “Just Stay Home If 2016 Brings Another Bush-Clinton Election” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-08-07 03:40:122015-08-07 03:40:12Just Stay Home If 2016 Brings Another Bush-Clinton Election
The bear spray didn’t work to begin with and her ‘rescuers’ come back only armed with bear spray?! Get a gun. Seriously.
A terrified jogger was mauled by a grizzly bear after surprising it while out running with a co-worker near a popular beauty spot in Alaska.
Gabrielle Markel was pinned down by the adult brown bear which had stepped out of thick brush along a trail near Skilak Lake on Alaska’s Kenai Peninsula.
The 20-year-old, an employee of a nearby backcountry lodge, tried to use pepper spray to ward the animal off – but suffered bites and scratches to her head, back and arm as the animal held her down.
Her friend, Kaitlyn Haley, 26, of California, escaped injury and ran for help.
(Read more from “CHEATING DEATH: Young Alaskan Jogger Barley Escapes Bear Attack After Fighting Back” HERE)
By Steve Guest. President Barack Obama told an audience at American University that the only option aside from Congress approving the Iran nuclear deal is war.
“Rejection of this deal leaves any U.S. administration that is absolutely committed to preventing Iran from getting a nuclear weapon with one option — another war in the Middle East,” Obama declared Wednesday. “I say this not to be provocative. I am stating a fact.”
(Read more from “Obama: Approve Iran Nuclear Deal or We’re Going to War” HERE)
______________________________________________________________
The President Gets Personal About the Iran Deal
By Alan M. Dershowitz. President Obama, in his desperation to save his Iran deal, has taken to attacking its opponents in personal ways. He has accused critics of his deal of being the same Republican warmongers who drove us into the ground war against Iraq and has warned that they would offer “overheated” and often dishonest arguments. He has complained about the influence of lobbyists and money on the process of deciding this important issue, as if lobbying and money were not involved in other important matters before Congress.
These types of ad hominem arguments are becoming less and less convincing as more Democratic members of Congress, more liberal supporters of the President, more nuclear experts and more foreign policy gurus are expressing deep concern about, and sometimes strong opposition to, the deal that is currently before Congress.
I, myself, am a liberal Democrat who twice voted for President Obama and who was opposed to the invasion and occupation of Iraq. Part of the reason I was opposed was because I considered, and still consider, Iran a much greater threat to the security of the world and to the stability of the Middle East than Iraq ever was. In my newly published e-book The Case Against the Iran Deal: How Can We Now Stop Iran From Getting Nukes?, I make arguments that I believe are honest, fair and compelling. I recognize some advantages in the deal, but strongly believe that the disadvantages considerably outweigh them and that the risks of failure are considerable. My assessment is shared by a considerable number of other academics, policy experts and other liberal Democrats who support President Obama’s domestic policies, who admire Secretary Kerry for his determination, and who do not see evil intentions in the deal.
The President would be well advised to stop attacking his critics and to start answering their hard questions with specific and credible answers. Questions that need answering include the following:
Even after the expiration of the nuclear agreement, will American policy remain that Iran will never under any circumstances be allowed to develop nuclear weapons? Or is it now our policy that Iran will be free to do whatever it wants to do once the deal expires?
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-08-06 03:59:532015-08-06 03:59:53Obama: Approve Iran Nuclear Deal or We’re Going to War [+video]
The political world is waiting in suspense for the first debate of this unprecedentedly large and exciting presidential field scheduled for tonight. However, anyone wishing to go on a date that night instead of watching the glorified game show will likely miss very little substance.
Let’s summarize what we already know from past debates in previous cycles about the substance of these debates. Every candidate says they want lower taxes, fewer regulations, and free market health care. Obamacare is the worst thing in the world, we must secure our borders, we must name our enemy, and Hillary is the worst person in the world. The only unknown about this debate is which candidates will load up on Red Bull before the forum and try to outdo the field trash-talking Obama and his policies in some memorable rant in an effort to draw attention to his/her candidacy.
The problem with this process is that we’ve gone through this already during every election cycle. Most prominently, last November, when every Republican campaigned on these same themes. Except – almost none of them will actually do what it takes to fight for us when it really matters. Despite years of promises similar to the platitudes we will likely hear during the debates, we have hit rock bottom as a nation and the far Left is successfully remaking America in every way imaginable – with no meaningful opposition standing in their way.
My colleague, Jeff Lord, has already compiled a list of questions that would be geared more towards gauging the authenticity of the candidates and whether conservatism is indeed their first language. In order to foster a substantive debate – one that will nudge the candidates off their carefully scripted talking points and force them to take stances on somewhat new, yet critically important issues, here is another list of questions from which debate organizers would be wise to choose. These questions would force the candidates to stake out new definitive stances on issues to which some might have never given thought, but will absolutely be confronted with as president.
1. Immigration
Moving beyond the platitudes, would you pledge to build the “San Diego style” double layered fence across the 700 most critical miles of the border by the end of your presidency? Would you restore the true meaning of the 14th Amendment and end unconditional birthright citizenship for illegal aliens? Would you overturn Obama’s DACA amnesty? With the growing threat of homegrown Islamic terror, what sort of changes to our immigration policies would you support to protect the homeland?
2. Judiciary
Every Republican promises to appoint strict constructionist judges. George W. Bush promised that as well, and instead we got John Roberts and a number of post-constitutionalist lower court judges out of his presidency. Would you have litmus tests on specific jurisprudence, such as the Commerce Clause and whether there is a constitutional right to redefine marriage, as a precondition for nominating any district or appellate judge?
3. Internet Sales Tax
Every Republican says they want lower, flatter taxes. But many Republicans support the internet sales tax. Would you pledge to veto any tax that enables cross-state tax collection on internet purchases?
4. Boehner/McConnell
Do you think Boehner and McConnell would be effective in pushing your bold agenda items or would they be impediments to conservative progress? Would you rather see them replaced?
5. Getting Past Democrats
All of you are promising bold conservative ideas. But even in the best case scenario, Democrats will still have a strong minority in the Senate capable of filibustering even the procedural motion on every bill. And unlike Republicans, they will actually use it. How do you plan to pass even 5% of your agenda items with such a fringe and determined minority party? Which leverage points are you willing to use to pass your top priorities?
6. Criminal Justice
With crime on the rise in some major metropolitan areas after two decades of steep declines, what do you think is fueling the change? Which policies would you pursue to bend this new trajectory? Do you think Obama’s effort to toss out federal mandatory minimums, which is supported by many Republicans, will accelerate this trend? Also, would you trust the current bench of federal judges to not abuse their discretion if federal mandatory minimums were lifted?
7. Article V Convention of the States
There are clearly a lot of enduring problems in our government that are beyond the ability of one president to fix. Would you use the bully pulpit of the presidency and the status as leader of the party to push long-term reforms advocated by Mark Levin, such as term limits, through Article V conventions of the states?
8. Military
Morale in the military has sunk to the lowest levels in years. Why do you think morale is so low and what would you do as president to restore the pride in our military? Would you end Obama’s social engineering policies related to homosexuals and transgendered in the military? Would you end his pursuit of woman in direct ground combat?
9. Foreign Policy
What is your plan to stay on offense against Islamic terror without ensnaring our military into endless, inconclusive Islamic civil wars and nation-building endeavors that we have witnessed over the past decade?
10. Marriage
In light of the Supreme Court decision, what is your plan to fight for the preservation of marriage, of which you all profess support for retaining its authentic definition?
These are just a few examples of questions that would spawn a deep, spirited, and thoughtful debate, which would make it easier for conservative voters to whittle down the huge presidential field. How many of these questions do you think will be posed during the Thursday night Fox debate? (Re-posted with permission from the author, “10 Questions GOP Candidates Should Be Asked Tonight”, originally appeared HERE)
Listen to this recent interview with the author:
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-08-06 03:59:092015-08-06 03:59:0910 Questions GOP Candidates Should Be Asked Tonight
Senior officials for the super PAC supporting Rand Paul’s presidential bid were indicted on federal charges of conspiracy and falsifying campaign records, the Justice Department said Wednesday.
Jesse Benton and John Tate, two top strategists to Paul’s father’s presidential campaigns, allegedly steered $73,000 to an Iowa state senator to convince him to endorse Ron Paul in the lead-up to the 2012 Iowa caucuses, prosecutors say. That senator, Kent Sorenson, had previously backed Michele Bachmann, a Paul opponent.
Benton, who served as Mitch McConnell’s campaign manager early in 2014, and Tate now head America’s Liberty PAC, a super PAC that raised $3.1 million to push Paul on television and online.
The long-simmering charges — which had been investigated by the Federal Elections Commission — now threaten to cast clouds over the campaign of his son on the eve of the first Republican presidential debate. Rand Paul has publicly backed Benton, who is married to his niece and has long been a top strategist to the Paul family, predicting he would “help us” in 2016.
“I think Jesse [Benton] is honest, he’s good at politics and I don’t think he’s done anything wrong,” Paul told a Kentucky ABC affiliate last December. (Read more from “Rand Paul Super PAC Officials, Ron Paul Consultants Indicted on Federal Charges” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-08-06 03:59:032015-08-06 03:59:03Rand Paul Super PAC Officials, Ron Paul Consultants Indicted on Federal Charges
Medical researchers are growing human organs in mice by implanting dead human baby organs into rodents, a practice that stands to gain greater scrutiny in light of undercover videos exposing what appears to be Planned Parenthood affiliates selling aborted baby parts to medical procurement companies like StemExpress.
In a fourth video released from the Center for Medical Progress (CMP), Planned Parenthood personnel can be seen sifting through aborted baby parts allegedly to show what parts can be salvaged and sold.
These mice or rats are created by removing a human organ such as a kidney from a dead human baby and implanting it into a mouse or rat for the purpose of medical research.
As reported in Live Science, Duke University medical student Eugene Gu co-authored a study released in January in which he said, “Our long-term goal is to grow human organs in animals, to end the human donor shortage.” According to the report, Gu is also founder and CEO of Redwood, California biotech company Ganogen, Inc.
“In the new study, Gu and his colleagues obtained human fetal kidneys from StemExpress, a Placerville, California-based company that supplies researchers with tissue from deceased adults and fetuses,” reported Live Science in January. Gu contends that the mothers consented to donation, and scientists were separated from the “donation process.” (Read more from “Report: Aborted Baby Parts Being Used to Grow Human Organs in Rodents” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00kathleenhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngkathleen2015-08-06 03:58:562015-08-06 03:58:56Report: Aborted Baby Parts Being Used to Grow Human Organs in Rodents
In a new video, Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) leader Khalid Batarfi called for more lone wolf attacks on America and glorified the attacks in Tennessee and Texas as part of the overall jihadist offensive against the United States.
He praised the July attack in Chattanooga, Tenn., in which a gunman killed five American servicemen at a military installation. He called for blessings upon Mohammad Abdulazeez, who “penetrated the base killing and injuring American marines in a blessed Jihadi operation.”
The gunman who sought to attack a cartoon contest in Garland, Texas, in May was also praised as part of the exhortations supporting more such attacks:
And our words cannot give justice to their sacrifice and heroism, of which the later (operations), was the killing of many among those who insult Islam and the honorable Prophet. In … the targeting of an offensive drawings exhibition in Texas, supported and protected by the American government. By the Grace of Allah, lone jihad (has) proven to be and always will prove to be a strategic weapon successfully hitting and penetrating the enemy’s fort.
In the video, Batarfi condemned “America, France, and other kufr [disbeliever] nations” that “assist and make legislations to protect those who abuse Islam and the Prophets.” To that point he stressed, “And as you put limits to freedom of expression and punish whomever goes against them, it is upon us to punish whoever transgresses out boundaries and sanctities.” (Read more from “Most-Wanted Terrorist Emerges From Shadows to Issue Chilling Threat to America” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-08-06 03:58:492015-08-06 03:58:49Watch: Most-Wanted Terrorist Emerges From Shadows to Issue Chilling Threat to America