Special Report: Three Shocking Immigration Trends [+video]

Pictures are worth a thousand words. Here are three charts that demonstrate just how absurd the elitist premise is as it relates to our immigration system. It is incontrovertibly clear that America has never seen anything close to the transformational degree of immigration we’ve had over the past couple of decades, and to an even larger extent, the projected trajectory of the next half-century.

Chart 1: Record Immigration on Top of Record Immigration

If one were to spend an entire lifetime in the sterile confines of Washington policy briefings, they would come away with the impression that this country admits very few immigrants. After all, everyone in Washington believes that immigration must be vastly increased across the board.

However, the reality cannot be further from the truth and is evident to anyone who steps outside the insular world of the political elites. For most Americans, stories like the Wichita, Kansas school district, where 81 languages are spoken as a result of the massive influx of immigrants and refugees, is not some anomalous hype; it is a reminder that America is no longer the melting pot that has made this country great.

One of the stalest of stale bromides among the political class is that “we are a nation of immigrants.” As Mark Levin recently clarified, “we are not a nation of immigrants, we are a nation of citizens.” Only a country in its initial stages is primarily a country of immigrants. Obviously, we welcome immigrants to become part of the melting pot and become citizens, but the notion that America was a nation of immigrants as an end to itself is simply not true.

At no point in our history did America even come close to accepting this many immigrants over such a short period of time. Over the 25-year period from 1989-2013, the U.S. has admitted 25.3 million immigrants. During a comparable 25-year period at the height of the Great Wave, from 1900-1924, only 16.8 million green cards were issued. And remember, this period was followed by several decades of very low immigration, which one could argue helped contribute to the successful assimilation of the immigrants from the turn of the century. It’s no wonder none other than Harry Reid was appalled by the unprecedented level of immigration back in 1993. Yet, 22 million immigrants and 12-15 illegal aliens later, he is completely silent.

Even as a percentage of the total population, we are approaching the all-time highest level of foreign-born residents – a level that was only seen when the country was still young and taking root. But over the next few decades, the level of immigration will rise so precipitously that nearly one in every five residents will be an immigrant.

Moreover, a number of individual states already have over 20% foreign born population, with California topping 27%. Some of these states could easily become majority foreign born by 2060.

Remember, this projection is all based on the current trajectory under existing law – assuming no “gang of 8 style” amnesty bill passes Congress to double immigration and grow chain migration through amnesty of illegal immigrants. After the more successful first great wave of immigration, Congress enacted a near complete shutoff of immigration for a few decades. Nobody is advocating that now, but the political class wants to double or triple the current baseline. Were something like that to become reality, the 2060 scenario will play out much earlier than predicted. Nobody in the political class will ever offer a coherent understanding of how this eventuality will preserve America as a harmonious society.

Chart 2: Explosion of Hispanic Immigration

The apologists for illegal immigration often assert that the crisis is the result of a “broken immigration system” and no viable path to legal immigration. What they glaringly omit is that the primary source of illegal immigration is from Mexico and Latin American countries – the region that has benefited from our legal immigration system in an unparalleled way. In fact, 50% of all immigrants since 1965 have come from Latin America–29% from Mexico alone. Over the past 44 years, 6.65 million people have emigrated from Mexico legally compared to 4.5 million who emigrated from Italy – the previous record-breaking country of origin – from 1880-1929.

The Hispanic share of the American population has gone from just 3.5% in 1960 and 8.8% in 1990 to 17.4% today, topping out at 56 million in raw numbers. According to the Census, by 2060 that number will reach 28.6% of the population. Among those under 18 years of age, Hispanics will then account for 33% of youth. That is one out of every three individuals. Hispanics already comprise 39% of California’s population and are expected to become an absolute majority between 2050-2060. Again, this is under current trajectory with existing law, not the suggested path of the political elites.

While the Hispanic culture, much like other great civilizations helps enrich this country, no other group has ever been granted this degree of destiny over the future of the country. This is not even a salad bowl anymore, much less a melting pot. This is not diversity; it’s an irrevocable transformation of America. Yet, among the political class there is near unanimity of opinion that this eventuality is not enough.

The cost of unprecedented immigration on our school system is incalculable. According to a recent study by the Center for Immigration Studies, a record 61.8 million, or 1 in 5 U.S. residents, speak a language other than English at home. Thirty-seven million residents speak Spanish at home and there are 708 counties where more than 10% of the population speaks Spanish at home. Another recent Pew study shows that in 17 states Latino children account for over 20% of the kindergarten enrollment in public schools. California Governor Jerry Brown claims that 30% of schoolchildren in his state are either “undocumented or don’t speak English.”

Has anyone explained what these numbers will look like in a few decades under the current trajectory? Has anyone ascertained the consequences of accelerating that trend line by passing more open borders legislation?

In 2001, Michael Barone, then an advocate for more liberal immigration policies, predicted that Hispanics would become assimilated and economically successful like the Italians and eastern European immigrants of a century ago. Last year, he recanted that prediction, noting that the rationale for most immigration from Mexico, coupled with the new policies of special privileged minority status, have worked against his previously held assumption.

While his observations are astute and undoubtedly accurate, it is also true that numbers matter. And at some point the sheer number of immigrants clustered from any single region creates a phenomenon of reverse assimilation.

Chart 3: America Admits 20% of the World’s International Migrants

The U.S. takes in a lot of immigrants, but how do they stack up against other countries? Pew has the numbers based on 2010 data and it is clear that not only does the U.S. admit more immigrants than any other country, it takes in 20% of all international migrants, even though the U.S. comprises just 4% of the global population.

Conclusion

What the political elites will never understand is that America is not merely a labor market or a spreadsheet of GDP projections. America is a nation of citizens united by a common cause in pursuit of shared values.

When the country was founded, George Washington always spoke of a nation of citizens united behind a common culture and a common cause in pursuit of liberty. This desire was punctuated by a series of letters Washington wrote to religious minority groups (Catholics, Jews, and some Protestant denominations), culminating with his 1790 letter to the Hebrew Congregation in Newport, Rhode Island, when he noted that all citizens of the United States “possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship.”

With an ideal antithetical to the multiculturalism and balkanization of today’s progressive America, Washington laid out a vision of American citizenship and pride of patriotism as follows in his Farwell address:

“Citizens, by birth or choice, of a common country, that country has a right to concentrate your affections. The name of American, which belongs to you, in your national capacity, must always exalt the just pride of Patriotism, more than any appellation derived from local discriminations. With slight shades of difference, you have the same religion, manners, habits, and political principles. You have in a common cause fought and triumphed together; the Independence and Liberty you possess are the work of joint counsels, and joint efforts, of common dangers, sufferings, and successes.”

Immigration, especially at this juncture in time, when followed prudently and gradually can enrich this culture of common cause in pursuit of liberty. But when immigration policy is prosecuted in such an impetuous, irresponsible, and precipitous fashion that there is no longer a common cause – that there is no longer patriotic assimilation – the America George Washington sought to establish will no longer exist. (See “Special Report: 3 Shocking Immigration Trends”, originally posted HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Watch How to Handle Your Local Jihadi Witnesses!

Jehovah’s witnesses come to my house nearly every Saturday. At best, they stay too long trying to convince me of their craziness. At worst, they get offended when I tell them that they’re wrong. Still, let’s put it in context. They’re mildly annoying, but they aren’t trying to kill me. Which is more than I can say for Jihadis. Just what would it be like if Jihadi Witnesses took the same tact? Watch below.

Have you heard the good news? Well this is the opposite. It’s the ‘bad news… terrible news.’ It’s the Jihadi Witness way! (See “Watch: Ding Dong! Jihadi Witnesses!”, originally posted HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Iraq War Vet Outraged After Being Told He Can’t Fly American Flag at Home

An Iraq War veteran says he has no plans to remove the American flag from his front porch after his homeowners association told him it has to come down.

Daniel Toner, who rents a home in the Belmont Park community of Suffolk, Virginia, said he was first told the flag was OK, but then was informed that it had to be approved and Toner would have to wait to put it up.

Toner told WAVY-TV he knew the homeowners association had certain regulations, so he contacted the property manager at Chesapeake Bay Management Inc. before he brought out the flag to make sure everything was above board.

He received an email back saying it was acceptable to fly a flag from his house as long as he followed the guidelines. But not long after, he received another message telling him to take it down.

Property manager Kimberly Katz admitted to speaking too early in the previous email, and said a resolution that would have made it acceptable to fly a flag had not yet been approved. (Read more from “Iraq War Vet Outraged After Being Told He Can’t Fly American Flag at Home” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

After Two Decades of Attendance, Army Now Refuses to Provide Honor Guard for Church’s July 4th Celebration

Photo Credit: Abilene Baptist ChurchFor nearly two decades, the U.S. Army has provided an honor guard for an Independence Day celebration at a Baptist church that predates the founding of the nation. But this year – that tradition has come to an end.

Officials at Fort Gordon say they will not be able to send an honor guard to a July 5th service at Abilene Baptist Church because it violates a military policy banning any involvement in a religious service.

“While there are conditions under which the Army can participate in events conducted at a house of worship, we cannot participate in the context of a religious service,” Public Affairs Officer J.C. Mathews told me.

He said officials at Fort Gordon as well as the Office of the Staff Judge Advocate reviewed the church’s request and determined they were in fact holding a “religious service” . . .

That policy would be an offense to most churches in America – but it is especially offensive when you consider the Army just refused to provide an honor guard for a church whose first pastor was a chaplain in the Revolutionary Army. (Read more from “Army Refuses to Provide Honor Guard for Church’s July 4th Celebration” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Senate Panel Defends Taxpayer Funding for Palestinian Terrorists [+video]

What are we doing to fight Islamic terror?

This is a pressing question for most Americans, especially given that Obama has no strategy. But why not start with a simple proposition? Let’s not fund terror with American taxpayer dollars.

Yet, astoundingly, a bipartisan group of Republicans and Democrats voted yesterday to preserve foreign aid to the so-called Palestinian government. While marking up an authorization bill for a number of programs within the State Department, Sen Rand Paul (R-KY) offered an amendment to eliminate aid to the Islamic terror entity known as the Palestinian Authority (it sounds nicer than their authentic name, the Palestinian Liberation Organization). Sadly, only four other Republicans joined with him in supporting the amendment: Sens. Risch (ID), Gardner (CO), Barrasso (WY) and Rubio (FL). Every Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, along with GOP Sens. Corker (TN), Johnson (WI), Flake (AZ), Purdue (GA), and Isakson (GA), voted to continue funding the terrorists.

According to the Congressional Research Service, we have sent roughly $5 billion to the Palestinian government since the mid-1990s. Our annual aid has fluctuated, but has hovered around $500 million per year. The worst practices in the modern world of jihad have been taught to the Arab world by these people, yet our taxpayer dollars and military training have gone into propping up this violent “government.”

While some conservatives feel Sen. Paul is weak on U.S. policy with Iran, he has been much tougher than most Republicans when it comes to Palestinian terrorists. Paul released the following statement after his amendment was defeated:

“American tax dollars continue to flow to governments that openly seek the destruction of one of our nation’s biggest allies, Israel. My support has not and will not waiver; I will continue pushing to cut off all U.S. foreign aid to the Palestinian Authority until they recognize Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state, renounce terrorism, and purge terrorists from their ranks.”

Paul is absolutely correct. The much-vaunted Mahmoud Abbas, who is regarded as an Angel of Peace among the “international community,” has consistently refused to recognize Israel’s right to exist and has consistently told his people they will continue to struggle until “all of Palestine is liberated.” A post on the official Facebook page of Abbas’ Fatah faction showed a picture of terrorists in the military wings of Fatah, Hamas and Islamic Jihad, under the banner of “brothers-in-arms: one God, one homeland, one enemy, one goal.”

So how could the committee members, led by Sens. Bob Corker (R-TN) and Ben Cardin (D-MD), agree to continue aid to Arafat’s terror group, even as they have joined in a unity government with Hamas? Aren’t we ostensibly sending money to those who are formally designated as terrorists by our own State Department? And remember, it’s pretty hard to get on the State Department’s terror list.

During the markup, Corker said he opposed the amendment because it would undermine the “Palestinian Authority” and risk destabilizing the “West Bank.”

This assertion cannot be farther from the truth. The so-called Palestinian government has been given more global aid per capita than any other country or entity, yet it is still a corrupt, terror-laden basket case. The entire purpose of keeping the bucks flowing into the Fatah-Hamas coffers is to create an Arab-Palestinian state in Judea and Samaria, what Corker erroneously refers to as the “West Bank” (hearkening back to Jordan’s illegal occupation in 1949 of the area west of the Jordan River). There is no greater potential destabilizing event than the creation of such a state. If a Hamas-Fatah state is not bad enough, there is no doubt that, given its geographical proximity to the unstable Jordan and Syrian Golan, this region would fall to the Islamic State the minute Israel’s military pulls out of the area.

Consequently, any continued aid to the PLO will only buttress Obama’s inexorable attempt to create a terror state in one of the most sensitive parts of the Middle East. At the very least, Senate Republicans should have conditioned aid to the PLO on Obama not supporting their bid for statehood at the UN.

Unfortunately, we can’t even get the political elites to agree not to send taxpayer dollars to the most violent terrorists. Just this past year, the U.S. has shipped to the Lebanese army a number of weapons, including AGM-114 Hellfire II missiles, M198 Howitzers, Humvees, and tens of millions of rounds of ammunition. The Lebanese Army is nothing more than a puppet of Hezbollah, which is a proxy of Iran.

Hence, a reaffirmation of aid to both of Israel’s top enemies – Hezbollah and Hamas – in the same week.

Why are so few politicians concerned about this dangerous and immoral use of American taxpayer dollars?

Washington is indeed broken. (See “Senate Panel Defends Taxpayer Funding for Palestinian Terrorists”, originally posted HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

MLK Niece: Planned Parenthood Is a Well Planned Killing Machine [+video]

Dr. Alveda King, the niece of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., has recently called abortion giant Planned Parenthood a “killing machine” in front of a California city counsel.

In May, King was invited by the Imperial Valley Coalition for Life to address the El Centro City Council about a new Planned Parenthood facility in the area which is seeking to perform abortions . . .

King is outspoken about the way that Planned Parenthood targets the Black community and she now feels they have their sights set on other minorities . . .

“Many people know that Planned Parenthood is after money offering abortions and harmful byproducts and in that process they target the most vulnerable, American women and families, Latinos and African Americans. Now, they are after the women of Mexicali and their babies because they are easy prey to their lies that they offer “safe, legal and rare abortions” . . .

“Here in El Centro, there’s a new sports pavilion and a proposed Planned Parenthood facility. The MLK sports pavilion offers help for the youth of the community while the Planned Parenthood facility offers death…It’s time to pray that Planned Parenthood doesn’t move in with it’s well planned killing machine, ” she said. (Read more from “MLK Niece: Planned Parenthood Is a Well Planned Killing Machine” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Candidly Speaking: American Jewish Leaders Fail to Respond to Obama’s Threats

It is time to stop making excuses for American Jewish leaders and their failure to respond to US President Barack Obama’s latest charm offensive, expressing “admiration” for Jews and “love” of Israel as a mantle to cast moral aspersions against the democratically elected government of Israel.

Obama is clearly determined to undermine the standing of the newly elected Israeli government by embarking on a campaign to promote an utterly fictional narrative of the Arab-Israeli conflict, even in advance of the June 30 deadline of the “negotiations” with Iran.

He orchestrated interviews with journalists Jeffrey Goldberg and Tom Friedman, whom he uses regularly to convey his distaste for Israeli policies – and Ilana Dayan of Israel’s Channel 2 TV. Considered a tough investigative journalist, Dayan on this occasion acted as though she were launching an Obama fan club.

She failed to pose any challenging questions and instead provided openings for him to benevolently display his loathing for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Obama also gave a major address to a Jewish audience at Washington’s Conservative Adas Israel congregation.

One of his acolytes, David Axelrod, recalls Obama – who for many years belonged to a church with an anti-Semitic pastor – describing himself as “the closest thing to a Jew” who has ever served as an American president. At Adas Israel, Obama even described himself as “an honorary member of the tribe” and called on Israelis and Jews to concentrate on “tikkun olam – repairing the world,” implying that universal humanistic values are more in keeping with Judaism than nationalism. (Read more from “Candidly Speaking: American Jewish Leaders Fail to Respond to Obama’s Threats” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Social Services Called 911 on Duggars Two Weeks Ago Because They Weren’t Granted Access to a Child, New Report Claims

By Fox News. A new report by In Touch claims the Duggar family was being investigated as recently as May 27, and a 911 call regarding the Duggars was placed on that date by a Washington County Department of Human Services (DHS) worker because the DHS was allegedly being denied access to a minor in the family.

The call was supposedly just days after a May 19 report by In Touch revealed Josh Duggar had sexually abused five females – including four sisters — when he was 14 or 15 back in 2002 and 2003. Josh Duggar, his parents, and two of his sisters—Jessa Seewald and Jill Dillard—have since spoken openly about the abuse.

After the revelations about the Duggars hit the web, the Arkansas Department of Human Services reportedly launched a new investigation into the family made famous by the TV show “19 Kids and Counting.”

The latest issue of In Touch magazine contains a transcript of the 911 call that was allegedly made regarding the Duggar family. In [the] supposed printed transcript of the call, the caller identifies the home they are calling about by saying “Address is the Duggar family home.”

The alleged transcript states the caller said the following when asked for the reason for the call: “Well, we’re Washington County DHS office we’re out here to, we have an investigation, and I guess they’re not being cooperative. We have to see the child to make sure the child is all right. So we just need police assistance or escort.” (Read more from “DHS called 911 on Duggars, New Report Claims” HERE)
____________________________________________

Michelle Duggar Suggests Police Chief Who Leaked Report Had “Lesbian Agenda”

By Conservative Tribune. About a month ago, Springdale Police Chief Kathy O’Kelley provided media entities with a police report stating that, during his childhood, reality TV star Josh Duggar molested five girls, including four of his own sisters. . .

Michelle mumbled something during the interview [with Fox News] that sounded to many viewers like “lesbian agenda.” The Duggars are a very politically active conservative family who “have been very vocal in their disdain for gay, lesbian and trans people.”

[Jim Bob further explained:] “She was getting ready to retire and she said, ‘There’s a few things I want to do before I retire’. . .I think I was on the list.” (Read more from this story HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Walmart Brawling Mom Brags About 6-Year-Old Joining Violent Fight; Because RACISM! [+video]

The “mom-of-the-year” involved in a brawl with a fellow shopper in a motorized chair inside an Indiana Walmart has spoken out.

And not only does the woman justify her actions, saying she was reacting to a racial comment the shopper made toward a store employee, but she defends the role of her 6-year-old son in the fight, The Blaze reported.

Appearing on the “Smiley Morning Show” on WZPL, in Greenfield, Ind., a person who identified herself as “Amber” claimed to be the mom seen in a video that has since gone viral, and said the incident all began when the other shopper used the n-word.

“(The woman) was sitting there yelling at an employee at Walmart, and she was telling her that she was a n***** and that she was going to get out of the chair and whoop her a**,” Amber said . . .

As for her son, who actually participated in the fight by kicking the other woman in the head and throwing shampoo bottles at her, Amber saw nothing wrong with his behavior. (Read more from “Walmart Brawling Mom Brags About 6-Year-Old Joining Violent Fight; Because RACISM!” HERE)
_______________________________________________

Watch: Original Video of the Despicable Walmart Brawl

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Teen at Pool Party: We Didn’t Have to Listen to Cops Because ‘They Called Us Names’ [+video]

Appearing with her godfather on “Hannity” Tuesday, a girl who attended Friday’s pool party where a police officer drew his weapon on a group of teenagers in McKinney, Texas, tried to excuse the behavior of the teens in the video.

“He started cussing at us first,” Ladariene McKever told Hannity. “No one’s going to listen to him if [he’s] calling us names for no reason.”

Her comments demonstrate a troublesome attitude among certain communities, where disobeying the police is considered acceptable under various circumstances . . .

The claim that the teens in in the video resisted arrest and refused lawful orders simply because the cop used foul language is sadly illustrative of a culture that has been conditioned to distrust and disrespect authority. (Read more from “Teen at Pool Party: We Didn’t Have to Listen to Cops Because ‘They Called Us Names'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.