Despicable: Wisconsin Dem Candidate to Hand Out KKK Hoods at GOP Convention

Photo Credit: IJ Review

Photo Credit: IJ Review

Wisconsin state representative and gubernatorial candidate Brett Husley will be handing out KKK hoods at a GOP state convention this weekend. When you’re a Democrat and don’t have any policy solutions, yelling “racism” will still get many in your party out to the polls.

From National Review:

A Democratic Wisconsin state representative and gubernatorial candidate is apparently trying to project a repugnant part of his party’s history on to Republicans by handing out Ku Klux Klan hoods to GOP supporters. Representative Brett Husley of Madison said he will give out what he calls “Republican Party hats” to state convention goers this weekend.

Both Republicans and Democrats have denounced Husley’s stunt. “We take serious issue with the policies pursued by Republicans that disproportionately affect communities of color, but this type of behavior has no place in the public dialogue,” state Democratic chairman said. His Republican counterpart called Husley’s plans “a reprehensible, vile stunt.”

Read more from this story HERE.

Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Appeal for NDAA; Constitutional Attorney Says Law Shreds Bill of Rights (+video)

bill-of-rights SCThe personal freedoms of Americans are now in tatters following the refusal of the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal to knock down the National Defense Authorization Act, constitutional and election law attorney William Olson says.

“This is a rather remarkable shredding of the Bill of Rights,” Olson told “The Steve Malzberg Show” on Newsmax TV.

“The National Defense Authorization Act … [has] this rather amazing authority to grant to the military the ability to pick up people … who support in some way al-Qaida or the Taliban or associated forces.”

But he explained that the language of the act is so “loose,” that anybody can be picked up for any reason.

“The president of the United States … [has] this power to detain indefinitely without charges, without trial, without an arrest warrant, without a grand jury, just to be able to hold someone who they think might be a threat of some sort,” Olson said.

Read more from this story HERE.

WATCH: Pelosi – Benghazi is a Diversion, ‘Can’t We Talk About Something Else?’

Photo Credit: AP

Photo Credit: AP

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi dismissed the Benghazi-related emails recently released by the White House as nothing new, refusing to acknowledge any wrongdoing by the administration.

“I haven’t seen it, but I will say this again — diversion, subterfuge — Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi. Why aren’t we talking about something else?” Pelosi said at Thursday’s press conference responding to a question from Breitbart News. “What I know of what I’ve read in the press about the emails was what was put out there before. I don’t think there was anything new there.”

Read more from this story HERE.

Poll: GOP Voters Like Huckabee Most, Say He’s Best Qualified

Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore

Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore

Republicans like former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee the most and consider him the best qualified potential GOP presidential candidate among the major contenders. But, as with the rest, they aren’t psyched for him to run, according to a new Economist/YouGov.com survey.

Some 72 percent of Republicans like Huckabee, a Fox host and conservative populist. That beats Sen. Rand Paul, at 66 percent, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie at 62 percent, and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush at 60 percent.

And 51 percent of Republicans also view him as qualified to be president, more than the rest again.

But as previous Economist/YouGov.com polls have shown, there is no GOP groundswell of support for Huckabee or the others. Only 34 percent want him to run, slightly behind Paul at 36 percent. By comparison, the group’s survey of Hillary Clinton found that 69 percent of Democrats want her to run.

Read more from this story HERE.

House GOP: Obama, Holder Undermining IRS Investigation; Special Counsel Needed

Photo Credit: REUTERS / Jonathan Ernst

Photo Credit: REUTERS / Jonathan Ernst

House Republicans Friday introduced a resolution calling on Attorney General Eric Holder to appoint a special counsel to investigate the IRS targeting scandal, blasting Holder for purposely failing to seriously investigate the agency.

Bob Goodlatte, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, accused President Obama and his administration of having “publicly undermined the investigation on multiple occasions.”

“The Attorney General says he won’t share any information with Congress about the investigation, but looked the other way when information was leaked to the media signaling that no one would face criminal charges,” said Rep. Jim Jordan, who introduced the resolution. “This resolution calls for a real investigation by an unbiased investigator to get to the truth and hold those responsible for this illegal targeting accountable for their actions.”

The resolution has six cosponsors including House Oversight chairman Rep. Darrell Issa, House Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. Bob Goodlatte, and House Ways and Means chairman Rep. Dave Camp, South Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy, Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz, and Louisiana Rep. Charles Boustany.

Read more from this story HERE.

Merkel Urged to Press Obama on NSA Scandal Ahead of Washington Talks

Photo Credit:  Imago/Barcroft Media

Photo Credit: Imago/Barcroft Media

Angela Merkel should ask Barack Obama to destroy her NSA file when she meets the American president in Washington this week, a leading German opposition politician has told the Guardian.

The Greens warn that failure to address the intelligence monitor scandal would risk undermining the credibility of the western alliance during the Ukraine crisis.

“Close co-operation between western allies requires joint values – also in relation to the activities of our intelligence services,” said Omid Nouripour, the Green party’s foreign policy spokesperson.

“Trying to sit out the NSA scandal won’t work: we can’t afford to let the remaining open questions strain relations during on the current crisis,” he said, suggesting that a symbolic act, such as the destruction of Merkel’s NSA file, could help to mend US-German relations.

The German chancellor travels to the US on Thursday and will meet Obama on Friday.

Read more from this story HERE.

Obamacare’s Individual Mandate Effectively Delayed Another Month

Photo Credit: Brian Snyder, Reuters

Photo Credit: Brian Snyder, Reuters

In a classic Friday news dump, the Department for Health and Human Services has just effectively delayed the individual mandate in President Obama’s health care law for another month, until May 1.

This shift is the latest in a dizzying set of changes that have been made to the enforcement of a policy that the administration defended all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Starting in 2014, individuals who did not purchase government approved insurance were supposed to be subject to a penalty of $95 or 1 percent of taxable income. Under the original sequence of events, individuals would have had until Feb. 15 to purchase insurance without being fined. Last October, HHS created a “hardship exemption” that pushed the deadline to March 31 to coincide with the end of the open enrollment period for individuals seeking insurance through the federal exchange.

Read more from this story HERE.

Apple, Facebook, Others Defy Authorities, Notify Users of Secret Data Demands

Photo Credit: Getty Images

Photo Credit: Getty Images

Major U.S. technology companies have largely ended the practice of quietly complying with investigators’ demands for e-mail records and other online data, saying that users have a right to know in advance when their information is targeted for government seizure.

This increasingly defiant industry stand is giving some of the tens of thousands of Americans whose Internet data gets swept into criminal investigations each year the opportunity to fight in court to prevent disclosures. Prosecutors, however, warn that tech companies may undermine cases by tipping off criminals, giving them time to destroy vital electronic evidence before it can be gathered.

Fueling the shift is the industry’s eagerness to distance itself from the government after last year’s disclosures about National Security Agency surveillance of online services. Apple, Microsoft, Facebook and Google all are updating their policies to expand routine notification of users about government data seizures, unless specifically gagged by a judge or other legal authority, officials at all four companies said. Yahoo announced similar changes in July.

As this position becomes uniform across the industry, U.S. tech companies will ignore the instructions stamped on the fronts of subpoenas urging them not to alert subjects about data requests, industry lawyers say. Companies that already routinely notify users have found that investigators often drop data demands to avoid having suspects learn of inquiries.

“It serves to chill the unbridled, cost-free collection of data,” said Albert Gidari Jr., a partner at Perkins Coie who represents several technology companies. “And I think that’s a good thing.”

Read more from this story HERE.

‘The Point Is We Should Have Tried’—Brigadier General on Failure to Rescue Americans in Benghazi

Photo Credit: Getty Images

Photo Credit: Getty Images

Dominos are falling in the Benghazi cover-up. Today, explosive and emotional testimony from Brig. Gen. Robert Lovell (Ret.), former Intelligence Director of U.S. Africa Command, rocked the House Government Oversight Committee. Lowell held his post at the time of the Benghazi attack, which fell into his area of command. From the U.S. base in Stuttgart, Germany, Lovell watched the message traffic relating to Benghazi, in real time, as the attack was unfolding.

As Lovell stated, it is “my duty” to come forward to give the American people a “full forthcoming” about what happened. The discussion in the post-Benghazi investigations has focused on issues such as time, distance and assets that could have been used to rescue the Americans under attack. However, said Lovell, his voice filling with emotion,

The point is we should have tried. The military is trained to go in the direction of gunfire.

In Benghazi they did not, and the question remains why.

Pressed by Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R–Calif.) about the mood in the Stuttgart command on that fateful night, Lovell admitted, “There was desperation” about how to save the individuals in Benghazi. “Why didn’t we do anything?” Lovell said with tears in his eyes, “There were a lot of deference to the desires of the State Department what they wanted us to do.”

As brought out by Rep. Jim Jordan (R–Ohio), for the first time in Lovell’s entire military career, he could not “run to the sound of the guns. “It is not what State did, but what they didn’t do, come forward to a stronger request for assistance,” said Lovell.

In Libya, State was in the lead. Lovell revealed that his primary contact at State had been Andrew Shapiro, assistant secretary for military and political affairs and a close associate of Hillary Clinton. Shapiro is now, like other Clinton associates, a consultant at Beacon Global Strategies.

Rep. John Mica (R–Fla.) asked Lovell if we might have made military moves that could at least have saved the two Navy Seals, Tyrone Woods and Glen Dougherty, who died around 5 a.m., when the attack resumed at the CIA Annex in Benghazi. Lovell said, “The military could have made a response of some sort.”

Strongly contradicting the narrative promoted by the White House (which, as we now know, originated with deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes) as to the nature of the Benghazi attack, Lovell said.

We knew very early on this was a hostile action, not demonstration gone terribly awry.

He confirmed that he dismissed very early on the idea that this was a demonstration based on a video. “It was not an escalation, it was an attack.”

It is encouraging that Americans are finally hearing first-hand accounts about what happened—and what could have been avoided—that night in Benghazi. But there is so much more yet to be uncovered. It is high time to create a congressional select committee to finally hold the Obama administration accountable.

This article appeared originally at Heritage.com and is re-published in full with the Heritage Foundation’s permission.

Miller: Republican Establishment Must Make Peace with Conservatives

Launch - Joe Walking to Front with KathleenIn a misguided article published in Politico Magazine last week, Forrest A. Nabors argued that I am poised to play the role of spoiler and deliver Alaska’s U.S. Senate seat to the Democrats this fall by running as an Independent. And predictably, the grand conspiracy is all Sarah Palin’s fault.

The suggestion that I intend to run as an Independent in the general election is no more than a rumor spread by the Weekly Standard’s report on a February Hays poll. In that poll, I was included as an Independent only because at least 10 percent of respondents said they would vote for me if their choice were between an establishment Republican and the Democratic incumbent, Sen. Mark Begich. To be perfectly clear: I have never said I am running for anything other than the Republican nomination.

While it is true that Gov. Palin played a decisive role in my stunning 2010 primary victory over the sitting vice chair of the Senate Republican Conference, her responsibility ends there. The truth is, but for the perfidy of the Republican establishment, the conservative movement in Alaska would have prevailed in 2010. And undoubtedly, the Alaska race in 2014 would be a unified Republican effort.

Sadly, Sen. Lisa Murkowski learned the wrong lessons from 2010. She was the only Senate “Republican” to vote for every piece of President Obama’s 2010 lame duck agenda. In the process, she helped the president up off the mat after a crushing defeat in the 2010 mid-term elections and handed him bipartisan legitimacy for his 2012 election. If that didn’t vindicate my 2010 primary challenge of Murkowski, and Palin’s decision to endorse my candidacy, I don’t know what would.

But that is the past. It’s time for people of good will to end the petty intramural conflicts and focus on the task at hand. Unlike many of my establishment Republican friends, I am not driven by hatred of Democrats. Nor am I motivated by the desire for power. I simply love my country and want to see it prosper.

For me, the 2014 election is about the renewal of America and Alaska’s economic future. It is a test of our resolve as a people. Will we stand up for the Constitution and our way of life? Or will we stand down as the world’s greatest civilization fades into the fog of history? I believe that our children and grandchildren deserve to face the future with the same sense of hope and optimism that we once did, and it is our responsibility to make that a reality. I believe that nothing is inevitable, that the future lies within the realm of our free will, that God still governs in the affairs of men who will exercise virtue and that, as Ronald Reagan once reminded us, “The future doesn’t belong to the faint-hearted; it belongs to the brave.”

That’s why I’ve embraced a bold agenda: return to Constitutional government. As Republicans, we must not abandon the sanctity of human life, as some would have us do. We cannot give up on our nation’s greatest asset, the traditional family. We must defend our religious liberties at all cost, and refuse the false promise of security in exchange for our 2nd Amendment rights. It is imperative that we repeal Obamacare. Half-measures and temporary fixes will not do. There is only one way to ensure freedom, access and affordability: Get government out of the way and let the free market work.

Republicans must also contend for the rule of law, and never reward lawlessness. Amnesty is a non-starter, and our borders must be secured. It is a grave matter of national security. Further, we must abolish the IRS and reform the tax code to make it fair and simple; audit the Federal Reserve; cut, cap and balance the federal budget; and return power to the states.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, our internal polling analysis shows that we are in a strong position to win both the primary and general elections in Alaska. Even public polling has seen my candidacy surge in a head-to-head match-up against Begich by 17 points since early last year.

The resurgent reform movement in Alaska is poised to make a big comeback, and without a doubt folks are more energized than they were four years ago. The number of registered Republicans is up 4.3 percent since 2008, while the number of registered Democrats is down 10.4 percent. In that year, Begich squeezed out a narrow victory with 48 percent of the vote against the GOP incumbent, Sen. Ted Stevens, who had just been convicted of multiple felonies. (Stevens’s convictions were later vacated because of prosecutorial misconduct.) This time around, Begich’s job approval in public polling has been hovering around 40 percent for months.

This is shaping up to be another wave election. It is inconceivable that an incumbent senator with job approval numbers so low heading into the election will be able to ride this wave of public discontent to 50 percent plus one, unless establishment Republicans sabotage another election.

Wherever I go across the state, there is seldom a kind word for the Republican Party. Much like the last two presidential elections, nothing could be more catastrophic to the cause of liberty, or to a Republican majority in the Senate, than to nominate another “me too” Republican.

Both of my opponents are now calling for unity, despite the fact that they refused to back the party nominee in the state’s last Senate election. The truth is, someone who helped tear the party apart simply isn’t qualified to lead a unity movement.

It’s time for the Republican establishment to end the impurity tests. A big-tent Republican majority must include full-orbed conservatives who embrace the party platform. If the Republican Party leadership is serious about governing, it has a choice to make: join the reform movement, or embrace a permanent minority status.