Unveiling ‘Shadows of Grief’: A Marysville Event to Confront the Fentanyl Crisis

In Marysville, California, an urgent event awaits on May 3rd, from 6 to 8 PM, at the esteemed Brick Coffee House located at 316 D St. More than just a book release, this gathering serves as a reminder of the ongoing battle against the fentanyl epidemic gripping Yuba and Sutter counties. Sponsored by Supervisor Andy Vasquez, this event provides a unique opportunity for our community to come together, strategize, and mobilize against the devastating impact of fentanyl. As attendees gather to commemorate the release of “Shadows of Grief,” they will engage in meaningful dialogue, share experiences, and contribute to ongoing efforts to combat the fentanyl epidemic.

Tracy Norris, author of “Shadows of Grief,” has turned personal tragedy into a beacon of strength and resilience. Her book is a powerful testament to the toll of fentanyl poisoning, blending personal narrative with community advocacy. As a mother who tragically lost her son to this insidious drug, Norris’s words resonate deeply.

Supervisor Andy Vasquez’s sponsorship underscores the urgency of our collective response to the fentanyl crisis. With each passing day, lives are lost, families shattered, and communities torn apart. But amidst this darkness, there is hope. By uniting as a community, we can strategize and implement measures to mitigate the impact of fentanyl and prevent further tragedies.

For those interested in securing their copy of “Shadows of Grief,” books will be available for purchase at the event and online through Amazon.

Join us on May 3rd as we stand together in solidarity, resilience, and hope. Together, we can illuminate the shadows of grief cast by the fentanyl epidemic and pave the way for a brighter, safer future for all.

________________________________________________

Recent Q&A With Author Tracy Norris

1. What inspired you to write “Shadows of Grief”?

Norris: I wrote Shadows of Grief as a tribute to my son, Marcus who lost his life to fentanyl poisoning. I had wrestled with his addiction for more than a decade by the time that he passed away and after his passing, I realized that there were many pieces of our journey that could have a positive impact on other people – if I were brave enough to tell our story publicly.

2. Can you share a little about your personal journey that led to the writing of this book?

Norris: I knew I had a story to share, but I found it challenging to complete my writing project. Recognizing the need for a change in my approach, I decided to enlist the support of a writing coach. Together, we worked on setting deadlines, refining content, and navigating through the writing process. We met twice a month, during which she reviewed my work, posed insightful questions, and provided valuable guidance to help me stay focused on conveying my message effectively.

3. What impact do you hope “Shadows of Grief” will have on readers?

Norris: Ultimately, my hope is for this book to offer support to those who are fighting for the sobriety of their children and for those who are grieving a child who has overdosed or has been poisoned by fentanyl. I pray that this book brings strength to the weary, courage to the fearful, and connection to the lonely.

4. In your opinion, what is the heart of “Shadows of Grief”?

Norris: Shadows of Grief leans heavily on the human experience of loving a person caught in addiction. It tells the story of life, love, loss, and grief and allows readers to gain insight to many of societies questions around addiction and the function of families.

5. How does faith and spirituality play a role in your story and the message of the book?

Norris: As a mother and an author, I lean heavily on my own faith experience. The book Shadows of Grief encourages readers to explore their hearts and extend prayers as they gain strength, wisdom, the ability to live fulfilled lives even after profound loss.

6. What do you believe sets “Shadows of Grief” apart from other books on similar topics?

Norris: There are many fabulous books where authors have candidly stepped out of the dark to share their stories, and they are all very important. This story largely took place here in Yuba County though, it is very important to engage communities with stories and faces that they have known and loved. There is an extra edge of reality that happens when we know the families, the individual people involved in a story, and when we take a step back knowing that this is real, fentanyl is dangerous, and it is something that we should all be talking about.

7. Can you talk about the significance of the title “Shadows of Grief” and what it represents in your story?

Norris: Shadows of Grief is a title that came from a Facebook group that my daughter created for me just after my sons passing. It started with just a few moms who had lost children, and it grew into a small, but supportive and engaged community of families who had lost loved ones to fentanyl poisoning.

8. How do you approach the delicate balance between vulnerability and strength in sharing your personal experiences?

Norris: Vulnerability and strength are very connected in terms of sharing such a delicate subject. Initially, sharing was very emotional for me. It was candidly writing my thoughts out in small conversations that built my strength and eventually allowed me to engage with larger groups.

9. What advice would you give to other parents or individuals who may be facing similar struggles with addiction in their families?

Norris: When you love someone suffering from substance use disorder, it often feels like the issues are too big, and like there is no hope. I would encourage families to embrace hope with every breath they have. To lean into community supports, seek out mentors, friends, and professionals to help carry some of the burden when it is too heavy, but most of all to make memories, laugh, and love fiercely.

10. Lastly, what do you hope readers will take away from “Shadows of Grief” after finishing the book?

Norris: It is my hope that in hearing Marcus’s story, he will in some way still be impacting the world. I hope that there were times that readers can relate, smile, and even laugh because even in the chaos of his addiction and many challenges, he did bring a whole lot of love and laughter into the world.

Supreme Court To Hear Arguments On Whether Trump Has Immunity From Federal Prosecution

The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on Thursday about whether former President Donald Trump can invoke presidential immunity to shield himself from federal prosecution.

The court agreed to take the case in February after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit panel ruled against an immunity claim Trump had asserted to shield himself from special counsel Jack Smith’s 2020 election case. Trump has contended that presidential immunity is necessary to ensure that presidents are able to do their jobs without fear of political retaliation.

“If a President does not have Immunity, the Opposing Party, during his/her term in Office, can extort and blackmail the President by saying that, ‘if you don’t give us everything we want, we will Indict you for things you did while in Office,’ even if everything done was totally Legal and Appropriate. That would be the end of the Presidency, and our Country, as we know it, and is just one of the many Traps there would be for a President without Presidential Immunity,” Trump posted on Truth Social last Friday.

“Obama, Bush, and soon, Crooked Joe Biden, would all be in BIG TROUBLE. If a President doesn’t have IMMUNITY, he/she will be nothing more than a ‘Ceremonial’ President, rarely having the courage to do what has to be done for our Country,” the former president added. “This is not what the Founders had in mind! Protect Presidential Immunity.”

The Supreme Court will hear arguments on “whether and if so to what extent does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office.” (Read more from “Supreme Court To Hear Arguments On Whether Trump Has Immunity From Federal Prosecution” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

WATCH — NYC Construction Worker Shares Message to Joe Biden: ‘F*CK You’

. . .A reporter asked the worker what he thought of seeing so many Trump supporters in Manhattan for the business records trial that former President Donald Trump is facing.

“What’s it like seeing so many Republicans in Manhattan, so many Trump supporters in Manhattan? Does that surprise you?” the reporter asked.

The construction worker, holding a pizza box, responded, “No, not at all. It’s turning now. It’s Trump’s turn again.”

The reporter then asked, “What’s your message for Joe Biden?”

The construction worker responded, “F**k you!”

(Read more from “WATCH — NYC Construction Worker Shares Message to Joe Biden: ‘F*CK You’” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

Biden Reads Out ‘Pause’ Instruction During Speech; Bizarrely Lies About Trump Giving Him Boots

President Joe Biden or President Ron Burgundy?

In a case of life imitating art, the commander-in-chief blurted out the stage note “pause” Wednesday while addressing union members in the nation’s
capital.

“Four more years. Pause,” said Biden, 81, a la Will Ferrell’s buffoonish newsman character in the classic 2004 comedy “Anchorman.”

Members of North America’s Building Trades Unions stepped in and dutifully chanted “four more years” in response to the president’s botched cue.

It was not immediately clear whether the instruction was included in Biden’s teleprompter or in his prepared remarks.

The gaffe was one of a series of bizarre moments that peppered the speech, including Biden saying his predecessor, Donald Trump, had given him a pair of boots as a present. (Read more from “Biden Reads Out ‘Pause’ Instruction During Speech; Bizarrely Lies About Trump Giving Him Boots” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Indictments Issued for Former Arizona GOP Chair Kelli Ward, Rudy Giuliani, and Mark Meadows in Alternate Electors Case (VIDEO)

An Arizona grand jury indicted several important allies of former President Donald Trump — including former Trump attorney and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, former Arizona Republican Chair Kelli Ward, and former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows — for their roles in disputing the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Along with Ward, Meadows, and Giuliani, former Trump attorney Jenna Ellis and former Trump campaign adviser Boris Epshteyn, along with several members of the Arizona Republican Party, were among those indicted, according to the Washington Post.

Meadows, Giuliani, Ellis, and Epshteyn are among those who were indicted for allegedly attempting to help Trump receive Arizona’s electoral votes in the 2020 presidential election, which was more than three years ago.

People such as Ward and Arizona state Sens. Jake Hoffman (R) and Anthony Kern (R) were also hit with charges long after they signed paperwork on December 14, 2020, certifying that Trump was the winner of the election.

The indictment of several Trump allies and members of Arizona’s Republican Party comes as a Bloomberg News/Morning Consult poll conducted between April 8 and 15, found that President Joe Biden is trailing Trump in several key swing states such as Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, and North Carolina by six or more points.

(Read more from “Indictments Issued for Former Arizona GOP Chair Kelli Ward, Rudy Giuliani, and Mark Meadows in Alternate Electors Case (VIDEO)” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Secret Service Officer Protecting Kamala Harris Came to Blows With Other Agents at Joint Base Andrews

A Secret Service agent tasked with protecting Vice President Kamala Harris brawled with several other agents on Monday morning, the agency confirmed.

The altercation took place around 9 a.m. near Joint Base Andrews on the outskirts of Washington DC, prior to Harris’ arrival on the scene.

The agent in question, whose identity has not been revealed, was immediately “removed from their assignment,” the Secret Service told The Post.

“A US Secret Service special agent supporting the Vice President’s departure from Joint Base Andrews began displaying behavior their colleagues found distressing,” Anthony Guglielmi, chief of communications for the US Secret Service, said to The Post. . .

Medical personnel were called onto the scene, per Guglielmi. That agent had been at Joint Base Andrews to support Harris’ planned departure, but ultimately the scuffle did not delay her travel. (Read more from “Secret Service Officer Protecting Kamala Harris Came to Blows With Other Agents at Joint Base Andrews” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Columbia Prof Who Called to Defund the Police, Now Wants Police to Protect Him From Anti-Israel Protests

The same Columbia University professor who advocated defunding the police is the same professor who is now pleading for law enforcement to protect him from the anti-Israel protestors invading the university’s campus.

Columbia Business School assistant professor Shai Davidai was a staunch anti-police advocate in the past, accusing law enforcement of using their weapons “disproportionately on black men.”

“Lawmakers give police offers the ammunition which they then use disproportionately on Black men. Should we hold lawmakers accountable?” Davidai said when asked by author and filmmaker Mike Cernovich if he is “worried that the evil racist police will shoot people?”

However, Davidai is demanding Columbia officials to send New York Police officers to his side and escort him to and from his office on campus amid the anti-Israel protests occupying university grounds.

He accused Columbia of “completely fail[ing] to protect the safety of Jewish students,” resulting in him “requesting approval to have a police escort of at least 10 cops with me.” (Read more from “Columbia Prof Who Called to Defund the Police, Now Wants Police to Protect Him From Anti-Israel Protests” HERE)

Black Conservatives Blast Biden Admin’s ‘Soft Bigotry’ After It Sues Sheetz for Discrimination

Prominent black conservatives blasted President Biden and his administration for their discrimination lawsuit against Sheetz convenience stores.

Biden’s Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is suing gas station chain Sheetz for what they say are discriminatory hiring practices because Sheetz screens job applicants for criminal records, the lawsuit claims.

Sheetz “violated federal law by denying employment to a class of job applicants because of their race, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit filed today,” the EEOC said in a Thursday press release.

“Sheetz has maintained a longstanding practice of screening all job applicants for records of criminal conviction and then denying them employment based on those records,” the EEOC statement alleges.

Multiple prominent black conservative figures lambasted Biden and the EEOC for the suit. (Read more from “Black Conservatives Blast Biden Admin’s ‘Soft Bigotry’ After It Sues Sheetz for Discrimination” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

NYT Claims Trump Is Getting ‘Favorable Treatment’ from the NYPD

The New York Times criticized the support former President Donald Trump has received from the New York Police Department as his ongoing Manhattan hush money trial continues to get unwanted media attention.

The NYPD has been appearing to protect Trump from undue media attention as he enters and exits the Manhattan courthouse every day.

The police force has shown unwavering courtesy to Trump, a stark supporter of law enforcement, making “law and order” a major theme of his 2020 presidential campaign with more than 900,000 officers endorsing him during the cycle.

The NYT critically highlighted the “favorable” treatment Trump has gotten from the NYPD.

Trump continues to receive favorable treatment from the New York City Police Department. For a week, a large N.Y.P.D. dump truck has been parked in the intersection of Hogan Place and Centre Street, with a uniformed driver sitting inside. Minutes before Trump’s arrival each morning, the dump truck has pulled a half-car length forward, blocking news photographers’ views of him entering the side door of the courthouse. And this afternoon, like those before it, the driver did the same maneuver for Trump’s 2:37 p.m. departure. Via the NYT.

(Read more from “NYT Claims Trump Is Getting ‘Favorable Treatment’ from the NYPD” HERE)

‘Historic Mistake’: Law Professor Takes Apart Alvin Bragg’s Case Against Trump — Then Predicts the Outcome

Jed Handelsman Shugerman, a law professor at Boston University, thinks Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s prosecution of Donald Trump is a “historic mistake.”

Shugerman made that conclusion after witnessing opening arguments on Monday in which prosecutors alleged Trump “orchestrated a criminal scheme to corrupt the 2016 presidential election.” . . .

The problems with their thesis, Shugerman wrote in the New York Times, are obvious: an “unprecedented use of state law” and a “persistent avoidance of specifying an election crime or a valid theory of fraud.”

“As a reality check, it is legal for a candidate to pay for a nondisclosure agreement. Hush money is unseemly, but it is legal,” Shugerman wrote.

He continued:

In Monday’s opening argument, the prosecutor Matthew Colangelo still evaded specifics about what was illegal about influencing an election, but then he claimed, “It was election fraud, pure and simple.” None of the relevant state or federal statutes refer to filing violations as fraud. Calling it “election fraud” is a legal and strategic mistake, exaggerating the case and setting up the jury with high expectations that the prosecutors cannot meet.

(Read more from “‘Historic Mistake’: Law Professor Takes Apart Alvin Bragg’s Case Against Trump — Then Predicts the Outcome” HERE)