Report: Not Enough Inspectors to Check Iran for Nukes [+video]
By Paul Bedard. The Iran nuclear deal being promoted by President Obama comes with an additional hidden tax of $36 million to watch the terror-nation’s nuclear program, according to a bipartisan budget analysis.
At $50 million, that is nearly three times, or 257 percent, more than the $14 million the United Nation’s spends now on Iran nuclear surveillance, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center.
What’s more: The International Atomic Energy Agency doesn’t even have enough experienced inspectors and will likely have to call some out of retirement to keep an eagle eye on Tehran, said the report from analyst Jessica Michek.
“To implement the interim agreement, the IAEA reportedly had to bring former inspectors back from retirement — it is unclear where the agency will find the manpower to carry out its increased workload in Iran while maintaining its verification programs around the world. If the IAEA’s expanded workload and additional inspectors increase costs in a manner similar to the interim agreement, implementing the [agreement] may cost $3 million a month in addition to the IAEA’s regular budget, or $36 million more a year,” wrote Michek. (Read more from “Report: Not Enough Inspectors to Check Iran for Nukes” HERE)
________________________________________________________
Sen. Blumenthal on Iran Deal: ‘There May Have Been a Better Deal If We Had Different People Doing It’
By Craig Millward. During a meeting with constituents in Cornwall, Conn., last week, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said there were “weaknesses” with the Iran nuclear agreement and added that, “there may have been a better deal if we’d had different people doing it.”
While speaking at an event hosted by the Democratic Coalition of Northwest Connecticut, Blumenthal said, “I have not made a decision about whether I will vote to reject the agreement or not. And I think that there are weaknesses in this agreement. The president has said, he’s right, no agreement is perfect. The Secretary of State has said, negotiations always involve compromise.”
“That’s true,” said Blumenthal. “The question is whether those weaknesses justify voting against the agreement. And the key question is what will happen if Congress rejects, what are the alternatives?”
“What will happen as a practical matter because the question is not whether we would have — you or I — negotiated a better deal,” said Blumenthal.
“There may have been a better deal,” he continued, “if we had different people doing it. But the question is what happens if this agreement is rejected?” (Read more from this story HERE)
Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.









