Virginia Governor to Sign Bill Releasing Hundreds of Juvenile Murder Convicts

Virginians might have dodged the bullet of a mass gun control bill, but lest some think sanity has been restored to the Virginia legislature, the same Democrat politicians relentlessly promoting restrictions on self-defense for law-abiding citizens are pushing for release of violent criminals. One major bill is now headed to Governor Ralph Northam’s desk.

On Monday, Virginia’s Senate passed HB35, which offers early release to juveniles serving a life sentence without parole once they have already served 20 years. This is a growing trend in a lot of liberal states, but a number of Republicans have bought into this radical idea of retroactively abolishing life without parole for juvenile murderers. This bill will potentially offer release for over 700 people sentenced to life as juveniles, according to liberal activists supporting the bill.

Shockingly, seven of the 11 Republican senators joined every Democrat in supporting this bill. The bill passed the state House 56-44 last month, with support of just one Republican, and now heads to Governor Northam’s desk.

So much for the promise of jailbreak only targeting low-level offenders. Proponents of these bills try to elicit sympathy for juveniles, as if we should treat them more leniently than adults, but murder is not a juvenile crime. It’s one thing to say we will treat juveniles more leniently for petty theft, drugs, or even armed robbery. But in order to get a sentence of life in prison without parole, one has to be a first-degree murderer, and even many of them escape this sentence. Thus, this leniency, by definition, is targeting the worst of the worst.

The infamous D.C. sniper, Lee Boyd Malvo, who, along with his older partner, killed 17 and injured 10 in 2002 in the D.C. area, is an example of who is serving life without parole in Virginia as a juvenile convict.

Increasingly, more violent crime in this country is being committed by juveniles. Roughly 8 percent of homicide suspects and 16 percent of rape suspects in 2018, according to the FBI, were juvenile offenders. This is not something that can be ignored. The suspects charged in the horrific murder of New York college student Tessa Majors are 13- and 14-year-olds. Does their tender age make the pain of her murder less? Does it entitle her family to a lesser degree of justice? Does it make these offenders, if convicted, less a threat to public safety?

What liberals in both parties refuse to recognize is that the murder or rape victims of juvenile offenders are no less victimized and no less deserving of justice than those victims of offenders a few years older. A life is a life. This is not a low-level crime where age should factor in. This bill makes no exceptions for MS-13 murderers or anyone with multiple murders. It truly rewards the worst offenders imaginable.

Moreover, this is not just about juvenile murderers. The bipartisan Left in this country doesn’t believe in the concept of incarceration, and leftists are now seeking to dismantle life sentencing for adult murderers as well. As I reported in January, the Virginia Senate passed the Orwellian-named “Geriatric prisoners; conditional release” bill, which would release, in most cases, anyone who is 55 years of age or older and has served at least 15 years or anyone who is 50 years of age or older and has served at least 20 years of the sentence imposed. Most murderers and rapists would be eligible. The bill passed the Senate along party lines, making it all but certain to pass the House, where Democrats enjoy a larger majority.

What’s worse, these very same Democrats pushing gun control on law-abiding citizens introduced a bill in the House last month restoring gun rights for those convicted of murder and other serious offenses as juveniles 16 or younger!

Meanwhile, although the massive gun ban on commonly owned guns, rifles, and magazines failed to pass a Senate committee, other gun control bills are slated to become law. The so-called “red flag” law already passed the Senate and is expected to sail through the House. It would require law enforcement to confiscate guns, circumventing the normal judicial due process required to limit constitutionally protected rights, upon belief that an individual is a danger to himself or others.

Meanwhile, the most violent criminal offenders who have absolutely exhausted endless due process are being given new parole opportunities to terrorize people. (For more from the author of “Virginia Governor to Sign Bill Releasing Hundreds of Juvenile Murder Convicts” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Trump Threatens to Sue Mueller and His Team

In a series of tweets this Tuesday morning, President Trump threatened to sue various people involved in Robert Mueller’s expansive probe into Russia’s alleged meddling in the 2016 election.

“These were Mueller prosecutors, and the whole Mueller investigation was illegally set up based on a phony and now fully discredited Fake Dossier, lying and forging documents to the FISA Court, and many other things,” Trump tweeted. “Everything having to do with this fraudulent investigation is badly tainted and, in my opinion, should be thrown out.”

As Law&Crime points out, his Twitter rant was sparked by the recent events surrounding the sentencing of his longtime confidant, Roger Stone, and Attorney General Bill Barr’s intervention in the case — followed by Barr’s public statements where he seemingly expressed frustration with Trump’s tweeting about cases of which he’s involved. (Read more from “Trump Threatens to Sue Mueller and His Team” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Bloomberg Wants to Deny Elderly Patients Cancer Treatment

A resurfaced video of Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg emerged over the week that showed him discussing health care while visiting a Jewish family in 2011 where he said that elderly people should be denied treatment for cancer as a solution for managing hospital’s scarce resources.

Bloomberg, who railed against Obamacare while talking to the Jewish family, said, “All of these costs keep going up, nobody wants to pay any more money and at the rate we’re going, health care is going to bankrupt us.”

“So, not only do we have a problem, it’s going to bankrupt us and we’ve got to sit here and say, ‘which things are we going to do and which things we’re not,’” Bloomberg continued. “Nobody wants to do that.”

“You know, you show up with prostate cancer and you’re 95-years-old, we should say, ‘go and enjoy, have a nice [inaudible], live a long life,’” Bloomberg continued. “There’s no cure and you can’t do anything, if you’re a young person we should do something about it. Society is not willing to do that yet, so [health care] is going to bankrupt us and we’re not looking at prophylactic care, we’re not trying to take care of things, so we don’t get sick.”

Bloomberg later praised the socialized medicine that Europe has, suggesting that it was better than America’s health care system. (Read more from “Bloomberg Wants to Deny Elderly Patients Cancer Treatment” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Homosexual Buttigieg Says He Can’t Understand How Christians Can Support Trump

On Tuesday night, former South Bend, Indiana mayor and Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg said he can’t understand how any Christian would support President Donald Trump, suggesting there is no “compatibility” there.

“Do you think it is impossible to be a Christians and support this president?” CNN’s Erin Burnett, serving as moderator, asked Buttigieg.

“I’m not gonna tell other Christians how to be Christians,” the former mayor responded. “But, I will say, I cannot find any compatibility between the way this president conducts himself and anything I find in scripture.” . . .

President Donald Trump, on the other hand, has continuously supported the pro-life movement, which is highly important to Christians across the nation. For example, Trump was the first president to deliver in-person remarks at the annual pro-life March for Life.

Moreover, as outlined by Russ Vought in a Daily Wire op-ed, Trump as supported the pro-life cause in other ways, like reinstate and expanding the Mexico City Policy and prohibiting Title X grantees from referring patients for elective abortions[.]

(Read more from “Homosexual Buttigieg Says He Can’t Understand How Christians Can Support Trump” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Infected Americans Return From Coronavirus Cruise

Fourteen Americans tested positive for carrying the new coronavirus just as they began their return to the United States from Yokohama, Japan, where they had been trapped aboard the luxury cruise ship Diamond Princess in a quarantine that began February 3.

As of today, February 17, Japanese health officials have confirmed 454 cases of COVID-19 on the ship, including 99 cases reported since yesterday. The cluster is, by far, the largest of any COVID-19 flare ups outside of China, where the outbreak began and has caused the vast majority of infections and deaths.

The new cases in the returning Americans will nearly double the current number of COVID-19 cases in the US, bringing the total from the current 15 to 29.

Originally, no American cruise ship passengers infected with the new coronavirus were meant to leave Japan. When the US government announced plans on Saturday, February 15, to evacuate the roughly 400 Americans stuck on the cruise liner, it noted that sick passengers would stay in Japan for treatment.

But evacuation plans for over 300 other Americans were thrown into question as they disembarked the ship and made their way on buses to the airport where planes chartered by the US State Department awaited them. En route, US officials received the results of testing done two to three days earlier that determined that 14 of the evacuees were infected with the novel coronavirus. (Read more from “Infected Americans Return From Coronavirus Cruise” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Life Sentence Overturned for Cartel Members Who Killed ICE Agent

Illegal aliens can break into our country with impunity and sue ICE officers if they don’t like conditions in the detention facilities. But if an ICE agent is killed by cartel assassins on a mission in Mexico on behalf of the United States government, suddenly borders seem to be important.

On February 15, 2011, members of Los Zetas cartel ambushed two ICE HSI agents traveling in Mexico. They murdered Jaime Zapata, but his partner, Victor Avila, managed to survive by remaining locked in the armored vehicle with diplomatic plates until police arrived on the scene. Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, the second most important federal court, overturned two murder convictions from 2017 for two of the hit men, Jose Emanuel “Zafado” Garcia Sota and Jesus Ivan “Loco” Quezada Pina. They are still serving up to life in prison for the basic murder charge and for a firearms charge, but this decision, unless overturned by the Supreme Court, will give these two cartel members the possibility of parole down the road.

Victor Avila and the parents of Jaime Zapata have been trying to get justice as well as answers from the U.S. government on the nature of the mission that led them into the trap. Zapata’s parents filed a $25 million wrongful death claim against the government, charging that the weapons used against them by the Zetas were part of the “Fast and Furious” gun-running scandal. But that lawsuit, according to Avila, was dismissed in the Southern District of Texas because the federal government did not cooperate by providing the plaintiffs with the documents they needed.

“These families, indeed the American public, are owed the truth about this tragedy and about the circumstances that led to guns going to Mexico — guns that shot two Americans and which may have killed many others,” wrote Judge Hanen in reluctantly dismissing the lawsuit because plaintiffs could not produce enough documents.

I interviewed Avila on my podcast last June in a two-part series (here and here) where he shared the details of the ambush, his quest for elusive justice, and how he has felt let down by our own government both during and after the attack. There’s also a documentary, “Agent Down on Highway 57,” that delves into the questions about the dubious mission they were tasked with, as well as the cover-up after the attack, which was not widely reported in the media at the time.

At issue in the federal appeals court case is whether 18 U.S.C. §1114, which criminalizes the murder of federal agents, applies outside the country. Two other appeals courts, the Second and Eleventh circuits, have ruled in the past that this section is applicable abroad, but the D.C. court ruled that one must presume “that Congress ordinarily legislates with respect to domestic, not foreign, matters.”

Victor Avila, who himself was gravely wounded during the attack, was devastated. “The Zapata family and I are devastated by the appellate court’s decision,” said Avila in a statement to CR. “Other appellate courts have upheld the extraterritorial occurrence in this statute. Why did the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals rule this way knowing this precedent exists? What message is being sent to the terrorist cartels in Mexico and around the world? This threatens the safety of our agents in Mexico and abroad. I will do everything I can to have Congress amend the statute and have the Dept. of Justice appeal this egregious decision.”

In total, there were seven individuals extradited for the murder. The other five weren’t even sentenced to mandatory life sentences to begin with because the Justice Department under Obama accepted a plea bargain. Their sentences ranged between 12 years and 35 years. Avilla tells me that the one with the 12-year sentence, Francisco Carbajal Flores, is slated to be released in August 2021.

“It’s unbelievable, this guy’s entire family was brought here on visas and were housed here for the duration of the trial on taxpayer dime. Yet my family had to pay for arrangements to stay in D.C. during the trial, even though I was almost killed by them while serving as a federal agent.”

This court decision leaves a gaping hole in federal law for seeking justice against those who murder federal agents abroad. Last week, the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association sent a letter to Attorney General William Barr urging him to appeal this decision.

“The message this ruling sends is one of open season on federal law enforcement officers who can now be targeted overseas,” warns the federal law enforcement association representing 28,000 agents. “Under this ruling, criminals and terrorists will take liberties that targeting a U.S. federal law enforcement officer, will bear no additional punishment, and if apprehended, may never be charged for their death in a United States Court.”

Nothing, of course, is stopping Congress from acting. Why is there never any sense of urgency in Congress to fix judicial loopholes that let off Zetas hit men or criminal aliens in our own country, such as Jose Zarate, Kate Steinle’s killer? Where is the “criminal justice reform” to close these loopholes? (For more from the author of “Life Sentence Overturned for Cartel Members Who Killed ICE Agent” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Illegal Alien Acquitted of Murder in Kate Steinle Case Ruled Incompetent to Stand Trial on Fed Firearms Charges

With all the talk of a two-tiered justice system this past week stemming from the corruption in the trial against Roger Stone, there is another two-tiered system in use in cities like San Francisco. Can victims of illegal aliens ever obtain justice if the trial occurs in a sanctuary city? That is the question we should be asking after Jose Garcia-Zarate, the man who shot Kate Steinle on a San Francisco pier in 2015, caught yet another break.

For the parents of Kate Steinle, the hits keep coming. First, in December 2017, a San Francisco jury acquitted Zarate of all murder charges, including manslaughter, related to the July 1, 2015, killing of Kate Steinle. She was killed by a bullet shot from the stolen .40-caliber gun held by Zarate. He is an illegal alien from Mexico who was deported five times and was released from San Francisco jail two and a half months before without notification to ICE. He remained in the country despite seven felony convictions.

Then, when the family sued the city of San Francisco and former Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi for negligence, the Ninth Circuit rebuffed the claim last year.

Last August, a state appeals court threw out the only remaining state charges. In 2015, the same jury that acquitted Zarate of manslaughter also convicted him of felony gun charges. The state appeals court overturned those charges. Zarate admitted to holding the gun that killed Steinle but maintains that the gun fired on its own.

“It is undisputed that defendant was holding the gun when it fired. But that fact alone does not establish he possessed the gun for more than a moment. To possess the gun, defendant had to know he was holding it,” wrote judge Sandra Margulies for the three-judge panel ruling that the trial judge erred in his instructions to the jury.

Finally, the federal government came in and charged Zarate on federal firearms violations. In 2017, he was indicted by a grand jury for being both a felon and illegal alien in possession of a firearm, both of which are federal crimes. The .40-caliber SIG Sauer P239 had originally been stolen from a U.S. Bureau of Land Management agent’s car. But on Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Vince Chhabria, an Obama appointee, ruled that Zarate is not mentally competent to stand trial. Zarate’s future remains unclear.

This man had enough mental acumen to cross our border five times after being deported. He was also competent to stand trial for seven prior felony convictions. What changed now?

The disquieting reality is that after 2015, Zarate was no longer a regular criminal in the eyes of the public. He became one of the most notorious illegal aliens in America. San Francisco politicians, judges, and jurors will do everything they can to ensure he gets off free.

It’s truly shocking how American victims don’t matter in the debate over our own sovereignty. Illegal aliens can sue our state and federal governments for simply enforcing our sovereignty, despite centuries of case law stating they have no standing in our country. Yet whenever Americans harmed by illegal aliens try to get standing to sue against lawlessness that affects their security and the public welfare, they are denied standing. Criminal smugglers can sue our government, yet Kate Steinle’s parents can’t sue San Francisco for harboring the illegal alien who killed their daughter.

However, there doesn’t seem to be a sense of urgency even from Republicans in Congress to pass a law giving victims of sanctuary cities a private cause of action to sue, as Trump called for in his State of the Union address. Instead, top Republicans are promoting a mass amnesty bill. They are also frantically trying to concoct a “DACA” amnesty bill for when the Supreme Court likely sides with Trump on canceling Obama’s clearly illegal executive amnesty program. When will they finally view American citizens like Kate Steinle as highly as they view “dreamers?” (For more from the author of “Illegal Alien Acquitted of Murder in Kate Steinle Case Ruled Incompetent to Stand Trial on Fed Firearms Charges” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

AG Barr Might Quit Over President Trump’s Tweets

Attorney General William Barr has reached out to multiple allies of President Donald Trump warning that he might quit over the president’s insistence on tweeting about Department of Justice cases, according to numerous reports. . .

The Washington Post reported Tuesday that Barr “has told people close to President Trump — both inside and outside the White House — that he is considering quitting” over the president’s tweets relating to DOJ investigations. The outlet cited three unnamed administration officials. One source told The Post of Barr, “He has his limits.”

The Associated Press also cited an administration official in reporting that “Barr has told people close to him he’s considering quitting his post after President Donald Trump wouldn’t heed his warning to stop tweeting about Justice Department cases.”

Last week, the attorney general sat down for an interview with ABC News where he expressed his frustration over the president commenting on DOJ cases over social media, saying such messages “make it impossible for me to do my job.”

White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham reacted to the interview a few hours after it aired, issuing a statement saying, “The President wasn’t bothered by the comments at all and he has the right, just like any American citizen, to publicly offer his opinions. President Trump uses social media very effectively to fight for the American people against injustices in our country, including the fake news. The President has full faith and confidence in Attorney General Barr to do his job and uphold the law.” (Read more from “AG Barr Might Quit Over President Trump’s Tweets” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Boy Scouts Files For Bankruptcy Due to Numerous Male-on-Male Sexual Assault Claims

By Mike Baker. The Boy Scouts of America, an iconic presence in the nation’s experience for more than a century, filed for bankruptcy protection early Tuesday, succumbing to financial pressures that included a surge in legal costs over its handling of sexual abuse allegations.

Founded in 1910, the Boy Scouts have long maintained internal files at their headquarters in Texas detailing decades of allegations involving nearly 8,000 “perpetrators,” according to an expert hired by the organization. Lawyers have said in recent months that former scouts have come forward to identify hundreds of other abusers not included in those files.

The bankruptcy filing, in Delaware, is expected to disrupt continuing litigation and establish a deadline for when former scouts can pursue claims. (Read more from Boy Scouts Files For Bankruptcy HERE)
_____________________________________

BSA Faces “THOUSANDS” of Boy Scout Claimants

By Corky Siemaszko. Facing mounting legal costs from defending itself against lawsuits alleging sexual abuse of boys, the venerable nonprofit sought Chapter 11 protection in a court filing early Tuesday. . .

Michael Pfau, whose Seattle-based law firm, Pfau, Cochran, Veretis and Amala, represents close to 300 people who say they were abused as Scouts in 30-plus states, called the filing historic.

“It will be far larger in terms of the numbers of victims and far more complicated than any of the bankruptcies we’ve seen so far involving the Catholic Church,” Pfau said. . .

“You’re looking at thousands of abuse survivors making claims,” he said. “This is much bigger than the bankruptcy filings involving the Catholic Church.” (Read more from Boy Scouts Files For Bankruptcy HERE)
_____________________________________

Boy Scouts Admitted Youth Practicing Homosexuality, Transgenders, and Gay Leaders Creating Massive Membership Issues

By Warren Smith. [T]he Scouts can’t blame James Dale, atheist groups, or the ACLU for its most recent, self-inflicted wounds. A 2013 decision to allow homosexual boys to participate in the program accelerated the membership drop. In 2015, others left or considered leaving after BSA’s leadership took the next step and began allowing gay adult leaders. The BSA began accepting transgender youth in 2017.

This drop in membership contributed to a flood of red ink in the organization’s finances, leading to consideration of bankruptcy . . .

In August, a group called Abused in Scouting filed a lawsuit in Philadelphia on behalf of a former Scout who claims he was abused by a Scout leader. The BSA has long kept a list of “ineligible volunteer files” that could include as many as 7,800 names. Victims’ advocates in lawsuits have pressured the Scouts to release the list, but the BSA has resisted, saying that to release a list of suspected abusers would violate their civil liberties and their rights to due process.

The Philadelphia lawsuit says, “It is apparent that the Boy Scouts defendants continue to hide the true nature of their cover-up and the extent of the pedophilia epidemic within their organization.” (Read more from Boy Scouts Files For Bankruptcy HERE)

Top 15 #Coronavirus Pics You Won’t See in Legacy Media

(For more from the author of “Top 15 #Coronavirus Pics You Won’t See in Legacy Media” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE