Harry Reid Praises Trump as ‘a Very, Very Smart Man’

Harry Reid had high praise for President Trump calling him “smart” and hard to beat in a recent appearance.

“I used to think that Donald Trump was not too smart. I certainly don’t believe that anymore,” the former Senate majority leader told David Axelrod in an interview preview that aired Friday on CNN. “I don’t think he’s intellectually a powerhouse, but he is basically a very, very smart man. No matter what the subject, any argument he involves himself in, it’s on his terms.”

The 79-year-old Nevada Democrat said the Democratic presidential contenders should not be under the illusion that Trump would be beaten easily in 2020.

In August, he warned that his party’s presidential candidates were taking far-left positions that were hurting their chances of beating Trump. He specifically pointed to “Medicare for all” and decriminalized border crossings as two potentially hazardous positions for Democrats.

Reid held his Nevada Senate seat from 1987-2017 and was the leader of the Democratic conference from 2005 to 2017. He announced he would not be running for reelection in 2016 after an injury left him blind in one eye. Sen. Chuck Schumer from New York is now the leader of the Senate Democrats. (Read more from “Harry Reid Praises Trump as ‘a Very, Very Smart Man'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

What Are the Chances Trump Wins?

With the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry picking up steam and the White House digging in, people’s outlook on the 2020 election is beginning to shift — at least it is in the gambling world.

Though he remains the favorite to win, again, oddsmakers show Trump’s chances slipping with the impeachment effort escalating. On the other side of the aisle, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren is enjoying some significant positive movement, while former Vice President Joe Biden — who’s quickly becoming the former frontrunner — saw his chances drop sharply, and Sen. Bernie Sanders’ odds plummeted post-heart attack.

According to odds and sports betting line site OddsShark as of Tuesday, Trump’s odds dropped somewhat — from +110 to +125 — since the Democrats first announced their impeachment inquiry on Sept. 25. After falling from +110 to +120 the first week the inquiry was announced, Trump’s odds remained the same the following week before dropping to +125 this week as the impeachment battle ratcheted up on both sides. . .

Sports Betting Dime (SBD) presents similar numbers. The betting line site gives Trump slightly better odds: +110, which the site notes are “990 points better than his next closest competitor.” As of Oct. 10, Warren moved up to +230 from the previous week, similar to OddsShark’s listing. Biden is likewise way down at +700, Yang is again in a distant third at +1500, and Sanders’ odds are at a grim +2000. Though OddsShark shows Clinton officially off the board, SBD still gives her +2500 odds. . .

The shifting outlook on the 2020 election has been significantly impacted by the Democrats’ impeachment campaign. Recent polling shows momentum in favor of impeaching the president. A Fox News Poll released this week shows a dramatic increase in those saying they believe Trump should be impeached. (Read more from “What Are the Chances Trump Wins?” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Trump Ambassador’s Lawyer Says He’ll Defy Administration and Testify to Dems’ Impeachment Probe

Despite the Trump administration’s efforts to stop him, United States Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland will testify in House Democrats’ impeachment probe against President Donald Trump next week, his lawyers says.

In a Friday morning statement, an attorney for Ambassador Sondland said, “Notwithstanding the State Department’s current direction not to testify, Ambassador Sondland will honor the Committees’ subpoena, and he looks forward to testifying on Thursday.” The statement adds that the diplomat “has no agenda apart from answering the Committees’ questions fully and truthfully.”

Earlier this week, Sondland was scheduled to voluntarily give testimony to a trio of House Committees but was blocked from doing so at the last minute by the Trump administration.

“I would love to send Ambassador Sondland, a really good man and great American, to testify,” President Trump said of the decision, “but unfortunately he would be testifying before a totally compromised kangaroo court, where Republican’s rights have been taken away, and true facts are not allowed out for the public to see.”

The chairmen of the relevant committees responded later that day with a subpoena for Sondland’s testimony and documents related to the investigation.

Sondland’s attorney says that while his client can provide testimony to the impeachment investigation, the subpoenaed documents are another matter entirely. The ambassador “respects the Committee’s interest in reviewing all relevant materials,” the statement explains, “however, federal law and State Department regulations prohibit him from producing documents concerning his officials responsibilities.”

The White House, however, has unequivocally stated that it will not cooperate with the impeachment probe in a letter sent out Tuesday night. Chief among the reasons it listed is the fact that the probe was announced without an authorizing vote of the full House of Representatives, as has been done in past presidential impeachment cases.

Sondland is a key figure in the controversy surrounding President Trump’s communications with Ukrainian government officials. In testimony given last week, former U.S. envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker told lawmakers that he consulted with Sondland in August about a proposed anti-corruption statement to be given by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

According to the testimony and a corresponding text message, Volker and Sondland discussed whether or not the statement should mention Burisma — the energy company that employed former Vice President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter — and allegations of interfering in the 2016 elections. Volker testified that the statement was ultimately scrapped. (For more from the author of “Trump Ambassador’s Lawyer Says He’ll Defy Administration and Testify to Dems’ Impeachment Probe” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

2020 Dems Take Aim at Churches, Schools, and Conscience Rights in Favor of LGBT Issues

At last night’s CNN LGBT town hall, 2020 Democrats showed the public where they stand on the issues of sexual orientation and gender identity as well as what they want to do to people and organizations who disagree with them.

Beto O’Rourke wants to punish religious organizations whose teachings don’t support same-sex marriage by stripping them of tax-exempt status: “There can be no reward, no benefit, no tax break, for anyone or any institution, any organization in America that denies the full human rights and the full civil rights of every single one of us.” Cory Booker promised to use the federal government to “go after schools” on transgender issues. Pete Buttigieg said that invoking religious liberty in the face of gay and transgender policy demands “is an insult to faith.” Elizabeth Warren made it very clear that she wants to use people’s tax dollars to pay for transgender surgery. Joe Biden threw his support behind the so-called “Equality Act,” which would put sexual orientation and gender identity on the same level as race and sex in federal discrimination law and would also gut religious liberty protections for dissenters.

So, what to make of all this? While this policy area has proven itself to be yet another race to the Left in this progressive purity contest of a primary, it’s also yet another issue where one has to wonder how the eventual nominee will defend policies like these to general election voters outside Democrats’ electoral safe haven in a national race against President Donald Trump. (For more from the author of “2020 Dems Take Aim at Churches, Schools, and Conscience Rights in Favor of LGBT Issues” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Ohio’s Drug Crisis Is Caused by Mexican Cartels, Not Prescription Drugs

There are endless lawsuits in Ohio against pharmaceutical companies over the drug crisis, but to get the real culprit, it’s time to sue the government for not enforcing immigration laws. The drug crisis is all about the Mexican drug cartels and their criminal alien distribution networks in our country, not prescription opioids.

In 2017, 4,854 died in the Buckeye State from unintentional drug overdoses, more than any other year on record. Of those deaths, just 10.8 percent were from prescription drugs, according to the Ohio Department of Health. And there’s good reason to believe that some of those deaths are really the result of heroin too. According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), many of the deaths due to morphine are likely really heroin deaths but recorded as morphine in toxicology “because morphine is a metabolite of heroin.”

In fact, the number of prescription deaths actually decreased before the crisis even began. The entirety of the epidemic increase beginning around 2014 was due to fentanyl and, to a lesser extent, meth and cocaine. . .

So, what is causing the deaths? It’s all the Mexican drug cartels and their illicit drug distribution networks, often powered by illegal aliens. Recently, there have been several busts in the Toledo area. In the third major bust in northwest Ohio, federal drug cops arrested Robert Escobar for intent to traffic 21 pounds of fentanyl. That might not sound like a lot, but given that a lethal dose of fentanyl is about two milligrams, this stash was enough to kill well over four million people, or more than a third of the state’s population.

U.S. Attorney Justin Herdman, as quoted in the Toledo Blade, perfectly captures the trail of the drug crisis.

“Mexican cartel activity in Ohio is very high — it’s a significant threat to us across the whole state. It’s not just Toledo, it’s every midsized city, small town, and big city — every city has connections back to Mexican cartels,” Mr. Herdman said, adding Toledo has historically been a market because of its network of highways, along with its consumer demand.

“That’s where our drugs are coming from. They’re not being manufactured here in the United States, the way that they get here is through the networks that the cartels run.”

Reading this comment, I was reminded of what Robert Murphy, special agent in charge of the DEA’s Atlanta office, told me earlier this year. “The product doesn’t sell itself or produce itself. It’s the people who make the cartel run, collect the cash, do the distribution, engage in violence, and run operations for the cartel. Those are what’s essential. The product is an after-fact. Without the people, the cartels have no success.”

Who are these people? “Predominantly, what we arrest here is illegal aliens. Sure, you might find some Americans who would be willing to go to Mexico and work for the cartels, but it won’t be the level that they need to have the control of the U.S. market like they do now with the illegals and Mexican nationals.”

During the major bust on “Devil’s Highway” in Lawrence, Massachusetts, two weeks ago, 40 individuals were arrested for drug trafficking in the major pipeline fueling the entire crisis in New England. According to former DEA special operations division head Derek Maltz, “The majority of the people arrested” in that bust were illegal aliens.

So where is the urgency to enforce immigration law and clamp down on sanctuary cities that release illegal alien drug traffickers when they are caught?

Maltz, in an interview with CR, lamented that the federal government won’t even take action to designate the Mexican cartels as terrorists. “In order for the U.S. to achieve its stated objective and dismantle the drug cartels, we must come to the realization that Mexican drug cartels are not solely organized crime organizations but instead are terrorist organizations who pose a national security threat and who have attacked and destroyed a democratic society directly across our southern borders.”

Earlier this year, the Ohio House passed a resolution asking the federal government to designate the cartels as terrorists. Maltz testified at the hearing on the resolution.

Ohio has already taken a hatchet to prescription opioids, and it is harming legitimate pain patients. Prescriptions have plummeted by 28 percent from 2012 to 2017. How about taking a hatchet to criminal alien networks? In our litigious society, it seems that nothing is off-limits to lawfare except illegal immigration. (For more from the author of “Ohio’s Drug Crisis Is Caused by Mexican Cartels, Not Prescription Drugs” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Donald Trump: Hunter Biden Couldn’t Recognize a Gas Tank

President Donald Trump continued attacking Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden on Friday, during a political rally in Louisiana.

“He doesn’t know what a gasoline tank looks like,” Trump said, explaining that Biden’s son knew nothing about energy despite earning up to $83,000 a month for sitting on a board of a corrupt energy company in Ukraine.

Trump also ripped Hunter for leaving China with $1.5 billion in investments from the bank of China despite knowing “nothing.”

He also mocked the news broadcasts for repeatedly saying that Trump’s claims of corruption were “totally unsubstantiated” … at Biden’s request.

“It’s not unsubstantiated, he took a fortune out of Ukraine, knew nothing, took a fortune out of China,” he said. (Read more from “Donald Trump: Hunter Biden Couldn’t Recognize a Gas Tank” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

‘Whistleblower’ Attorney Was Informant who Scuttled Trump’s Nominee for CIA Watchdog

Andrew Bakaj, the attorney representing the so-called whistleblower at the center of the impeachment movement targeting President Donald Trump, previously was a whistleblower witness whose public allegations scuttled the confirmation of the Trump administration’s nominee for CIA inspector general.

Bakaj’s original complaint against Trump’s nominee was filed with the office of the Inspector General for the U.S. Intelligence Community. The IG at the time was Chuck McCullough, who is currently working at Bakaj’s three attorney law firm representing the so-called whistleblower.

Like Bakaj, the so-called whistleblower against Trump also filed his “Disclosure of Urgent Concern form” with the IG for the intelligence community, albeit with the new IG, Michael Atkinson.

Bakaj founded the Compass Rose Legal Group, which is representing the central so-called whistleblower on the matter of Trump’s phone call with the Ukrainian president. Bakaj confirmed that his law firm is also representing “multiple whistleblowers in connection to the underlying August 12, 2019, disclosure to the Intelligence Community Inspector General.”

Bakaj previously interned for Hillary Clinton and did work for other Democrats. At the CIA, Bakaj helped to develop a whistleblower reprisal investigation program. (Read more from “‘Whistleblower’ Attorney Was Informant Who Scuttled Trump’s Nominee for CIA Watchdog” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Trump Pardons World War II Scientist

President Trump has granted a posthumous pardon to World War II scientist Zay Jeffries, who helped the U.S. develop artillery shells capable of piercing German tanks’ armor during World War II, the White House announced Thursday.

Jeffries was convicted in 1948 of engaging in anticompetitive conduct that violated the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. He died in 1965 at age 77.

“One of America’s leading scientists, Dr. Jeffries was crucial to the United States war effort in World War II,” the White House said. “His efforts enabled the United States to develop artillery shells capable of piercing the armor of German tanks, and his contributions to the Manhattan Project helped end the war in the Pacific theater.”

While he was indicted in 1941, Jeffries still “proved vital to the war effort, prompting Secretary of War [Henry] Stimson to take the extraordinary step of requesting, with President Roosevelt’s approval, that the attorney general defer any prosecution until after the war,” according to the White House.

“When the Department of Justice returned to the case in 1947, it grounded its legal theory on a Supreme Court precedent that did not exist when Dr. Jeffries was originally indicted,” the White House said. (Read more from “Trump Pardons World War II Scientist” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Study Reveals How Much Health Care for Illegal Aliens Would Cost America

A plan from 2020 Democrats to provide free, American taxpayer-funded health care to all illegal aliens living in the United States would cost up to $23 billion a year, a new study finds.

In June, the majority of 2020 Democrats running for president — including Joe Biden, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) — endorsed a plan that would force American taxpayers to provide free health care to all 11 to 22 million illegal aliens in the U.S. and anyone else who crosses the southern border.

The latest study by Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) researchers reveals that providing health care to all illegal aliens would cost American taxpayers up to $23 billion a year should every illegal alien enroll. This total includes at least 2.5 million low-income illegal aliens and their children who would cost almost $13 billion a year, alone, to be given health care.

Even if only about five million illegal aliens enroll in federal subsidies for health care, American taxpayers would be forced to foot a $10.4 billion bill every year, CIS researchers conclude. Overall, providing taxpayer-funded health care to each illegal alien costs Americans about $4,600 a year.

With a scenario in which higher-income illegal aliens are enrolled in Obamacare and poorer illegal aliens take Medicaid, that plan would still cost Americans nearly $20 billion a year assuming every illegal alien enrolls. Based on current enrollment trends, a lower enrollment rate among illegal aliens would nonetheless cost Americans $10.7 billion a year. (Read more from “Study Reveals How Much Health Care for Illegal Aliens Would Cost America” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Joe AND Hunter Biden Were Both Paid by Burisma (VIDEO)

So, the plot thickens with Joe Biden and his Ukraine ties. House Democrats have pulled the trigger on their grand plan to impeach President Trump for simply winning the 2016 election. . .

As the son of then-Vice President Joe Biden, it seems pretty clear that he was there selling access. That’s the allegation. It’s a question that hasn’t gone away, and one that has irritated Joe Biden to no end. And now we’re hearing that Joe Biden was also paid $900,000 which was part of his lobbying fee on behalf of Burisma. The former vice president has repeatedly said that he and his son never discussed overseas business, despite being pictured in a photograph golfing with two Ukrainian energy executives. They didn’t talk business. Who are you kidding? Our friends at RedState wrote about this earlier today. Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s attorney, also repeated the claim on Fox News’ Sean Hannity Wednesday night (via NY Post):

Rudy Giuliani, the personal lawyer for President Trump, alleged that a Ukrainian natural gas company that employed Joe Biden’s son Hunter also paid the former vice president $900,000 in lobbying fees.

Giuliani, appearing Wednesday night on Fox News’ “The Sean Hannity Show,” cited as evidence documents released by Andriy Derkach, a member of Ukraine’s parliament.

(Read more from “Joe and Hunter Biden Were Both Paid by Burisma” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE