Democrats Are About to Get Their 2020 Gun Control Candidate

The 2020 Democratic presidential field is about to get even more packed, and one prospective candidate wants to make his run all about gun control.

According to a report published by The Atlantic on Thursday, staunch gun control proponent Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) has made plans to announce his presidential bid on late night television next week and will “center his campaign on gun control.”

Swalwell was a vocal supporter of a major House gun control bill that passed a few weeks ago, but his track record on anti-gun legislation goes back further.

In May 2018, he penned an op-ed in favor of banning and confiscating “military-style semiautomatic assault weapons” and wrote that “we should buy back such weapons from all who choose to abide by the law, and we should criminally prosecute any who choose to defy it by keeping their weapons.” . . .

Currently, Swalwell is an original co-sponsor of House Democrats’ “Assault Weapons Ban of 2019,” which would ban 205 firearms by name and cast a wide net against other semi-automatic guns as well as guns with “military-style” cosmetic features. (Read more from “Democrats Are About to Get Their 2020 Gun Control Candidate” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Obama’s Team Explains Why He Isn’t Weighing in on Biden Allegations

On Wednesday, former Vice President Joe Biden attempted to address the growing scandal over claims of his past “innappropriate touching” of women by issuing a video explaining that he has always been about making a “human connection” but assuring his supporters that he now “get[s] it”: “social norms” have “shifted” and he will change how he interacts with women accordingly. The next day, The Washington Post published three more accounts from three more women detailing times they say Biden crossed the line — bringing the total number of accusations to seven.

With high-profile Democrats taking positions on the growing scandal, one key voice has been glaringly absent: the man Biden can thank for being vice president for eight years. So where is Obama in the Biden debate?

According to The Hill’s sources, we shouldn’t expect to be hearing publicly from Obama anytime soon, but we should assume he is still “standing behind” his former VP amid the growing list of accusers.

“President Obama thinks the world of him and thinks he’d be an excellent president,” a source The Hill describes as someone “close to Obama” told the outlet. The “infinite amount of time” Obama has already spent praising Biden’s character should be enough for people to know where he stands, the source suggested.

But if he’s so confident in Biden’s character, why won’t Obama simply say so publicly, rather than through surrogates? The Hill’s sources say this is just how Obama plans to operate for the Democratic primary, and Biden should undersand that well enough. “President Obama is not going to be weighing in on the primary and the day-to-day stories around it. And Joe Biden would be the first to tell you that he’ll have to earn the nomination on his own,” the source told The Hill. (Read more from “Obama’s Team Explains Why He Isn’t Weighing in on Biden Allegations” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Chicago Takes New Legal Action Against Jussie Smollett

The City of Chicago announced on Thursday that it is filing a civil lawsuit against Jussie Smollett after the actor refused to reimburse the city for costs associated with the investigation of his alleged hate crime hoax.

Chicago sent Smollett a letter in late March demanding that he pay $130,000 to offset costs of attack investigation, saying: “This is a reasonable and legally justifiable amount to collect to help offset the cost of the investigation.” . . .

“Mr. Smollett has refused to reimburse the City of Chicago for the cost of police overtime spent investigating his false police report on January 29, 2019,” Bill McCaffrey, City of Chicago Department of Law, said in a statement. “The Law Department is now drafting a civil complaint that will be filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County. Once it is filed, the Law Department will send a courtesy copy of the complaint to Mr. Smollett’s Los Angeles-based legal team.”

“The Law Department will file the suit in the near future. As part of this legal action, the Law Department will pursue the full measure of damages allowed under the ordinance,” the statement continued. “The City of Chicago and Chicago Law Department will not have any further comment at this time.” . . .

“We cannot create the perception that if you’re rich or famous or both that you got one set of justice and for everybody else, it’s something much harsher. That won’t do, and we need to make sure that we have a criminal justice system that has integrity,” [Chicago Mayor] Lightfoot said in an interview. “The state’s attorney’s office has to provide more information about the rationale for the decision to drop the charges.” (Read more from “Chicago Takes New Legal Action Against Jussie Smollett” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Lawmakers in Both Houses of Congress Press Trump to Speed up Withdrawal From Syria

A bipartisan group of 12 lawmakers from both the Senate and the House of Representatives have sent a letter to President Donald Trump urging him to expedite the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Syria.

This letter comes from a wildly divergent group of politicians ranging from Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, to Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortex, D-N.Y. Paul and Lee were the only senators to sign the letter.

In December, Trump announced that ISIS had been defeated and that the U.S. would be pulling all its troops out of Syria imminently. This announcement was followed immediately by the resignation of his former defense secretary, James Mattis, as well as confusion from commanders on the ground and dismay from Syrian Kurds.

The Kurds are an ethnic group without a country, spread over territory in Turkey, Syria, Iran, Iraq, and Armenia. The Turkish government has had trouble with a militant group of Kurds within its own borders and because of this has declared all ethnic Kurds to be terrorists. It has used the instability caused by the Syrian civil war to launch incursions against Kurdish cities, which has in turn pulled the Kurds away from helping the U.S. fight ISIS, a fight in which they’ve proven to be invaluable allies.

The plight of the Kurds presents a tricky dilemma to the Trump administration, which needs to find a way to protect U.S. allies from getting massacred without getting dragged into committing to the endless occupation of an unstable foreign country.

There’s also the question of whether or not ISIS is truly defeated to such an extent that it can’t rebuild itself.

The number of troops in Syria is expected to drop to 1,000 by early May and will eventually shrink to 400, the Pentagon announced on Friday.

In the letter, the senators and members of Congress told the president that they recommended “direct, robust engagement and coordination with both U.S. allies and other regional governments to ensure the safety of Syria’s civilian populations and avert the resurgence of ISIS.” They argued that “U.S. leverage — such as conditioning weapons sales to Turkey” could be effective in preventing Turkish forces from attacking U.S. Kurdish allies.

The U.S. has already tried to put conditions on the sale of F-35 fighter jets to Turkey, warning that the deal would be scrapped if the Turkish government did not agree to turn down a deal with Russia to buy S-400 missiles. This standoff has been going on for several months now, with no clear resolution in sight.

And while the letter is bipartisan, not everyone in Congress believes that a quick withdrawal of U.S. troops would be a good idea.

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., sharply criticized the president’s decision to rapidly withdraw from Syria in a Facebook video from December, warning that while ISIS has been “significantly degraded,” it is “not fair or wise to say it has been defeated.” Conservative Review reached out to Rubio to get his opinion on this letter by his colleagues.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., also slammed the decision, calling it a “huge Obama-like mistake.”

The twelve congressional signatories to the letter are Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Reps. Ted Lieu, D-Calif., Justin Amash, R-Mich., Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., Jeff Duncan, R-S.C., Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., Thomas Massie, R-Ky., Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., Ro Khanna, D-Calif., and Bill Posey, R-Fla. (For more from the author of “Lawmakers in Both Houses of Congress Press Trump to Speed up Withdrawal From Syria” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Man Arrested in Reported Sword Attack Over MAGA Hat Spat

By AP. San Francisco police arrested a man they say slashed another man’s hand with a sword after the victim allegedly knocked a “Make America Great Again” hat off his head.

Police say 30-year-old Leor Bergland was arrested Wednesday night when officers spotted him in a restaurant.

Police say a 27-year-old Berkeley resident swatted Bergland’s baseball cap from his head Friday night when they encountered each other in a San Francisco neighborhood. Police say Bergland drew a sword and cut the victim’s left hand before fleeing. The victim and another man gave chase, but stopped when Bergland turned on them and brandished the sword. (Read more from “Man Arrested in Reported Sword Attack Over MAGA Hat Spat” HERE)

______________________________________________________

Woman Harassed 74-Year-Old Man for Wearing MAGA Hat in Starbucks: ‘Get the F*** out of My Town’

By Yahoo. A California accountant’s attempt to shame an elderly Trump supporter backfired.

On Monday, Palo Alto local Rebecca Parker Mankey told her followers on Facebook that she reamed out a 74-year-old man, reportedly named Victor F., at Starbucks for wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat.

“Anybody in Palo Alto knows this freak,” Mankey wrote alongside photos of the man. “He was sitting in Starbucks. I think he lives in Palo Alto. He will never forget me and will think seriously about wearing that hat in my town ever again. If you see him in this hat, please confront him. You do not want to be the person who didn’t speak up as we slipped into fascism.”

She continued, “I yelled at him. Called the entire Starbucks to order and yelled at him more about how it is not ok to hate brown people. He threatened to call the cops. I left after yelling at him some more.”

After her lunch break, Mankey said she returned to Starbucks. “I went back in and yelled that I had changed my mind and wanted him to call the police because I wanted to know his name, where he lived, his wife’s name, and where his kids went to school,” she wrote.

(Read more from “Woman Harassed 74-Year-Old Man for Wearing MAGA Hat in Starbucks: ‘Get the F*** out of My Town'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Homosexual Hook-Up App Grindr Labeled National Security Threat, Forced to Sell

A Chinese gaming company has decided to sell the popular LGBTQ dating app Grindr LLC after a U.S. national security panel declared the app to be a threat to service members, Reuters first reported.

Beijing Kunlun Tech Co Ltd, which has owned the California-based dating app since 2016, decided to sever ties at the behest of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, which pointed to major concerns over personal data of app users — notably military and intelligence personnel — being made publicly available. . .

The decision of CFIUS to intervene in Grindr’s business operations signals increasing doubt on the part of U.S. officials in the ability of Chinese businesses to keep sensitive information of Americans secret.

In recent years, the panel also blocked the sale of the money transfer company MoneyGram to Chinese business owners, the report said. (Read more from “Homosexual Hook-Up App Grindr Labeled National Security Threat, Forced to Sell” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Major Upset: Conservative Supreme Court Candidate Shocks Liberals With Surprise Victory

It was a statewide race that only the nerdiest of political nerds were following at the national level, but suffice it to say that we’d be hearing a lot about it if the expected outcome had come to pass. By way of background, Wisconsin’s Supreme Court has been decidedly conservative for years, but when a liberal justice won a resounding 12-point victory last fall (Badger State voters choose Supreme Court members in nominally “non-partisan” elections), the Left immediately set it sights on the 2019 contest. If a left-leaning candidate had defeated another right-leaning jurist — as was widely anticipated by political experts — liberals believed they’d have a very real shot at wresting ideological control of the state’s high court in 2020. But a funny thing happened on the way to that liberal judicial renaissance. Voters intervened:

Appeals Judge Brian Hagedorn held a narrow lead early Wednesday in the race for Wisconsin Supreme Court, according to unofficial tallies that were so close both sides were bracing for a recount. In an early morning tweet and statement to supporters, Hagedorn claimed victory. “The people of Wisconsin have spoken and our margin of victory is insurmountable,” the statement read…Hagedorn led fellow Appeals Judge Lisa Neubauer 50.2% to 49.8% with nearly all of Tuesday’s votes unofficially counted — at a margin that allows a recount. A win by Hagedorn would defy the predictions of prominent groups that typically back conservative judicial candidates but counted him out and wouldn’t spend on his behalf during the race.

Hagedorn, the conservative, was seen as such a long-shot underdog that some deep-pocketed conservative groups decided not to spend money in the race, resulting in a large disparity that favored the left-wing message machine. But a concerted push by grassroots activists, and an eleventh-hour blitz by former Governor Scott Walker, helped secure what appears to be a major upset. Conservative groups closed the race with an ad reminding voters of the Kavanaugh fight, while liberal organizations (like Eric Holder’s) tried to tie their opponent to President Trump. Also, you night think that Hillary Clinton’s 2016 loss would’ve helped Democrats internalize the lesson that, contra their own talking points and hilarious posturing, money does not necessarily “buy” elections. This outcome should reinforce that reality:

(Read more from “Major Upset: Conservative Supreme Court Candidate Shocks Liberals With Surprise Victory” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Previously Deported Illegal Alien Arrested on 100 Counts of Child Porn

While the media is focused on the potential cost if President Trump shuts down the southern border for a period of time, there is not much focus on the cost of the status quo unbridled illegal immigration. And that cost is often not quantifiable in monetary terms. A previously deported illegal alien has been arrested in Louisiana on 100 counts of possession of child pornography and sexual battery of a minor.

According to Louisiana’s Attorney General Jeff Landry, Miguel Martinez, an illegal alien who had previously been deported in 2005, “was arrested on 100 counts of possession of pornography involving juveniles under the age of 13 years old, one count of production under the age of 13, and one count of sexual battery of a juvenile under the age of 13.”

This was the conclusion of a joint state and federal operation, which included Mississippi state authorities as well. Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the investigative arm of ICE, has placed a detainer on Martinez pending the outcome of the criminal case. An ICE spokesman confirmed these details with Blaze Media but declined to comment further on Martinez’s background and nationality until he is transferred to ICE custody.

These cases of criminal aliens who have been previously deported, yet successfully re-enter to victimize more Americans have become all too familiar. However, this case has a wrinkle that demonstrates how the criminal alien problem sits at the nexus of both weak border enforcement and sanctuary cities thwarting interior enforcement. It was discovered over the course of the investigation that Martinez had already been convicted of sex crimes in California and is a registered sex offender in the Golden State.

How can known sex offenders be allowed to remain in the country, rather than being turned over to ICE for deportation? It’s dangerous enough for citizen sex offenders to remain around children, but harboring other countries’ sex offenders is a completely avoidable liability.

This case also shows that what is attracted to sanctuary states doesn’t necessarily remain in sanctuary states. By incentivizing illegal immigrants to come and obtain benefits, sanctuary jurisdictions often place other cities and states in danger, in this case, the states of Louisiana and Mississippi.

This is one of the reasons why the Founders swapped out the Articles of Confederation for the Constitution and empowered the federal government to deal with issues pertaining to the sovereignty of all the states collectively. They wanted to protect the entire union from “the intrusion of obnoxious aliens through other States,” in the words of Madison.

Roger Sherman, among the greatest of all the Founders, noted during the House debate on the Naturalization Act of 1790 that “it was intended by the Convention, who framed the Constitution, that Congress should have the power of naturalization, in order to prevent particular States receiving citizens, and forcing them upon others who would not have received them in any other manner” (emphasis added). Sherman was emphatic that federal control was designed to “guard against an improper mode of naturalization” and prevent individual states from flooding the country with immigrants based on “easier terms.”

However, getting all the states to cooperate with federal law enforcement is only half the equation. Even after the criminal aliens are deported, if the border continues to remain largely open, they will march right back in, as Martinez did. This is the untold story of the mass migration and asylum fraud. While as much as 40 percent of Border Patrol resources are diverted to “care for, transport, provide medical and hospital watch for families and children” of those surrendering to agents en masse, according to CBP Commissioner Kevin McAleenen, criminal aliens who don’t want to get apprehended have a free opening to re-enter undetected.

The Trump administration ramped up interior deportations by 46 percent in fiscal year 2018 over the final year of the Obama administration. In the same year, ICE apprehended, with intent to deport, illegal aliens who collectively were convicted of or charged with 2,028 homicides, 50,753 assaults, and over 12,000 sexual assaults or sex offenses. How many of these criminal aliens are able to return even more easily than before because of the unprecedented shutdown of Border Patrol?

A recent example was Simon Rochel-Cervantes, an illegal alien from Mexico who spent 11 years in a Kansas facility for the rape of a child. After serving his sentence, Rochel-Cervantes was deported back to Mexico on February 19, yet he was picked up by police in Kansas again just two weeks later.

While a partial border wall alone will not directly solve the mass migration and asylum fraud, it will likely help Border Patrol strategically slow down and interdict those who enter surreptitiously because of their criminal records.

As Jeff Landry, Louisiana attorney general and former congressman, said about this case, “Illegal immigration has real-life consequences – countless numbers of needless crime victims, including too many Louisiana families and children. For their sake – I again urge Congress to realize the national emergency we have at our Southern border, support President Trump, build the wall, and help us make our communities safer.” (For more from the author of “Previously Deported Illegal Alien Arrested on 100 Counts of Child Porn” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Trump Fires Back After High-Ranking House Democrat Asks IRS for 6 Years of President’s Tax Returns

President Trump responded with a dismissive taunt on Wednesday after a House committee chairman formally requested the IRS provide several years of his personal and business tax returns, in a move that prompted congressional Republicans to warn that Democrats had “weaponized” tax law.

Told by a reporter at the White House that Democrats wanted six years of his tax returns, Trump replied: “Is that all? Usually it’s 10. So I guess they’re giving up. We’re under audit, despite what people said, and we’re working that out — I’m always under audit, it seems, but I’ve been under audit for many years, because the numbers are big, and I guess when you have a name, you’re audited. But until such time as I’m not under audit, I would not be inclined to do that.”

The request Wednesday by Massachusetts Rep. Richard Neal, who heads the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, is the first such demand for a sitting president’s tax information in 45 years. The move sets up a virtually certain legal showdown with the White House.

Neal made the request in a letter to IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig, asking for Trump’s personal and business returns for 2013 through 2018. Neal told Rettig that Democrats have a duty “to ensure that the Internal Revenue Service is enforcing the laws in a fair and impartial manner.” . . .

The president’s congressional allies registered immediate and fierce disapproval. The top Republican on the House Ways and Means Committee, Kevin Brady, R-Texas, wrote to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin to decry what he called Democrats’ “abuse” of their authority. (Read more from “Trump Fires Back After High-Ranking House Democrat Asks IRS for 6 Years of President’s Tax Returns” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Ilhan Omar Pushes for Release of Jailed Muslim Brotherhood Leader

Rep. Ilhan Omar — whose short tenure in Congress thus far has been rife with controversy — made a shocking appeal Tuesday, openly pushing for the release of a senior member of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood (MB).

Omar took to Twitter Tuesday evening demanding that “Trump” call for the release of Hoda Abdelmonem, a senior member in the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood’s women’s affiliate.

I quickly confirmed that this was the same Abdelmonem who has for years been a member of the MB, which advocates for Islamist takeover of Egypt.

Abdelmonem remains an influential figure and a senior leader in the Islamist outfit, and the campaign for her release has been a top priority item for Muslim Brotherhood-aligned individuals, groups, and governments. Muslim Brotherhood-tied media networks such as Middle East Eye, Middle East Monitor, and Al Jazeera have dedicated nonstop coverage to this issue, often falsely portraying the Islamist activist as a human rights advocate. Muslim Brotherhood-tied campaigners in the U.S. have continued a full-court press for Abdelmonem’s release.

Additionally, these same entities all remain fiercely opposed to the rule of Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, who in 2013 ousted Mohamed Morsi, the Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated former president in Cairo. So convincing the president to call for the release of their Islamist ally would arguably chip away at el-Sisi’s legitimacy.

After posting a photo of her meeting with pro-Muslim Brotherhood campaigners, Omar then doubled down on her push, retweeting this post linking to an Al Jazeera video that calls for Abdelmonem’s release:

Al Jazeera is the state-controlled, Islamistpromoting media network of the Qatari government, which uses slave labor and funds terrorist organizations throughout the Middle East. Al Jazeera regularly promotes Muslim Brotherhood leaders and groups, which seek to overthrow stable U.S. allies and install Islamist theocracies in their stead.

Since entering Congress, Rep. Omar has continued to show a preference for antagonistic U.S. adversaries and throwback Islamist leaders and groups, as opposed to U.S.-friendly Middle East nations and peaceful reform movements worldwide. She has become a regular on the CAIR speaking circuit. The terror-tied Islamist group raised mountains of cash for her congressional campaign.

The Muslim Brotherhood is classified as a terrorist organization in several nations, including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Russia, Egypt, and Bahrain. The group has spawned the likes of deceased Al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of ISIS. Republicans in Congress continue to push legislation and directly appeal to President Trump to classify the MB as a foreign terrorist organization, given its tendency for violence and the group’s extremist, anti-American philosophy. (For more from the author of “Ilhan Omar Pushes for Release of Jailed Muslim Brotherhood Leader” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE