Trump Reveals the Lethal Authority U.S. Troops Have at Border

President Donald Trump revealed that U.S. troops are authorized to use lethal force at the southern border if they need to defend themselves, after speaking to service-members deployed around the world Thanksgiving morning.

“If they have to they’re going to use lethal force, I’ve given the order, I hope they don’t have to,” Trump said in response to a question on the matter. “You’re dealing with a minimum of 500 serious criminals, and I’m not going to let them be taken advantage of.”

The president dispatched nearly 6,000 U.S. troops to the border in recent weeks to bolster border enforcement. Trump justified the deployment by pointing at the advancing caravan of thousands of Central American would-be migrants who want to claim asylum. The caravan used violent tactics to break through legal ports of entry in Mexico, prompting alarm amongst U.S. authorities.

The Trump administration recently saw a similar scare of its own after the Department of Homeland Security noted that it had to temporarily close the busiest port of entry between the U.S. and Mexico Tuesday evening in order to reinforce barriers and harden the ports of entry.

DHS Secretary Nielsen noted in an announcement on Twitter at the time that the hardening was in direct response to threats from members of the migrant caravan who reportedly wanted to storm the port of entry en masse in order to overwhelm U.S. authorities and illegally seek refuge. (Read more from “Trump Reveals the Lethal Authority U.S. Troops Have at Border” HERE)

‘Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Amazon HQ Will Cost New Yorkers $61,000 per Employee Thanks to Democrats’ Corporate Cronyism

Like many New Yorkers, I want Amazon to come to our state and its job creation to benefit our residents. You’d be hard-pressed to find a city or state in America that would not welcome the economic activity created by capitalism. But the announcement by Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Mayor Bill de Blasio that Amazon will receive $3 billion in our tax dollars in exchange for making Long Island City its new headquarters left fiscal policy wonks scratching their heads and taxpayers holding the bag.

Despite some unfriendly policies adopted by de Blasio and Cuomo over the years that have plaed additional burdens on our private sector, New York remains “the capital of the world” and a major center for commerce. This coupled with our talent pool has organically attracted major investors and job creators since its inception. . .

Other locations have managed to attract Amazon’s business without breaking the bank. For example, Virginia will now be home to the other Amazon HQ2, but at a fraction of the subsidies New York is providing. Between Arlington and the commonwealth of Virginia, the government will be subsidizing $573 million for the same 25,000 jobs that will be brought to New York. Whether this is a result of a raw deal or, as Cuomo admitted, a consequence of Virginia’s lower tax burden, it is the people of New York who will pay the price of the largest incentive package ever provided to a private company by the state.

Many of my colleagues on other side of the aisle are misdirecting their shots at Amazon, citing “corporate greed,” but you can’t blame the tech giant for taking advantage of the best deal given to them. After all, they are in the business of making and (unlike our city and state government) saving money. Instead, these Democrats should be pointing their fingers at the mayor and governor they endorsed and elected. (Read more from “Amazon HQ Will Cost New Yorkers $61,000 per Employee Thanks to Democrats’ Corporate Cronyism” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Dem Congresswoman Calls Trump ‘Saudi Arabia’s B**Ch,’ Gets Rebuked for Her Own Links to Assad

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) tweeted out a profane rebuke Wednesday of President Trump after Trump indicated that the United States would not take action against Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman over the murder of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

Gabbard’s remark drew some criticism of her own dealings with Syrian president Bashar al-Assad. She met with him in an unannounced trip in January 2017 and was skeptical that he was behind the deadly chemical weapons attack in April 2017. . .

Trump argued in a statement that hurting U.S. relations with Saudi Arabia would be a mistake. (Read more from “Dem Congresswoman Calls Trump ‘Saudi Arabia’s B**Ch,’ Gets Rebuked for Her Own Links to Assad” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Facebook Pushed a Top Executive to Publicly Disavow Support for Trump, Then Fired Him

In one of the most shocking stories to get little media coverage this year, The Wall Street Journal reported ten days ago that Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg pressured a top executive at his company to apologize for his support of President Trump in the 2016 election, and issue a letter just before that election explaining that he had switched his support to libertarian Gary Johnson.

According to reporters Kirsten Grind and Keach Hagey, Oculus founder Palmer Luckey says that he was put on leave and then fired for his support for Trump. The Journal reported:

In the fall of 2016, as unhappiness over the donation simmered, Facebook executives including Mr. Zuckerberg pressured Mr. Luckey to publicly voice support for libertarian candidate Gary Johnson, despite Mr. Luckey’s yearslong support of Mr. Trump, according to people familiar with the conversations and internal emails viewed by The Wall Street Journal.

Luckey ended up negotiating a $100 million settlement, an acceleration of stock awards and bonuses that he would have received thanks to his sale of Oculus VR to Facebook in 2014. Facebook, for its part, denied that Luckey was fired for his political views. But Luckey was a supporter of President Trump’s for years, going back to 2011, when he urged Trump to run for president by mail. In September 2016, The Daily Beast reported that Luckey had given a $10,000 donation to NimbleAmerica, an anti-Hillary ad group focused on trolling the Democratic candidate. Luckey then apparently posted on a Reddit chain under a pseudonym regarding Clinton:

Hillary Clinton is corrupt, a warmonger, a freedom-stripper. Not the good kind you see dancing in bikinis on Independence day, the bad kind that strips freedom from citizens and grants it to donors.

(Read more from “Facebook Pushed a Top Executive to Publicly Disavow Support for Trump, Then Fired Him” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

The American Principle: There Can Be No Blessings Without God in Our Lives

What is the secret ingredient to building a safe, prosperous, and free republic? Separation of powers? Check. Checks and balances? Check. The right balance of federalism? Check. The proper definition of fundamental rights? Check.

Our Founders were all ready to kick off the new republic with much hope (and concern). Yet there was one element missing. During the worst crisis moment of the Constitutional Convention in the humid Philadelphia summer of 1787, when negotiations collapsed over the crafting of Article I of the Constitution, the sagacious and elderly Benjamin Franklin reminded his younger colleagues of the secret ingredient to success that had sustained the nascent republic during the previous 11 years since 1776:

I will suggest, Mr. President, that propriety of nominating and appointing, before we separate, a chaplain to this Convention, whose duty it shall be uniformly to assemble with us, and introduce the business of each day by an address to the Creator of the universe, and the Governor of all nations, beseeching Him to preside in our council, enlighten our minds with a portion of heavenly wisdom, influence our hearts with a love of truth and justice, and crown our labors with complete and abundant success!

There is no foundation to this republic without acknowledgment of God as the source of its blessing

God is not only mentioned in our Declaration of Independence but identified as the source of our “self-evident” inalienable rights. As such, it was quite obvious to our Founders that he is the source of all blessings to the nation that was founded on those self-evident truths. Our nation has been the most successful one in modern history because it was led by people who understood that its success was inextricably linked to beseeching God for his blessings and thanking him when blessings are given.

This point is punctuated by the actual words spoken by Franklin on that fateful Thursday before July 4, 1787, as recorded in Madison’s notes:

In the beginning of the Contest with G. Britain, when we were sensible of danger we had daily prayer in this room for the divine protection. Our prayers, Sir, were heard, and they were graciously answered. All of us who were engaged in the struggle must have observed frequent instances of a Superintending providence in our favor. To that kind providence we owe this happy opportunity of consulting in peace on the means of establishing our future national felicity. And have we now forgotten that powerful friend? I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth — that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid? We have been assured, Sir, in the sacred writings, that “except the Lord build the House they labour in vain that build it.” I firmly believe this; and I also believe that without his concurring aid we shall succeed in this political building no better than the Builders of Babel: We shall be divided by our little partial local interests; our projects will be confounded, and we ourselves shall become a reproach and bye word down to future ages. And what is worse, mankind may hereafter from this unfortunate instance, despair of establishing Governments by Human Wisdom and leave it to chance, war and conquest.

Indeed, 10 years earlier, Samuel Adams drafted a Thanksgiving Proclamation on behalf of the Continental Congress. On December 17, 1777, the colonists marked a day of thanksgiving “to acknowledge with Gratitude their Obligation to him for Benefits received, and to implore such farther Blessings as they stand in Need of.”

Two years after the Constitutional Convention, when George Washington had become president and the fledgling Congress was beginning to create our foundational laws, they turned to God in what would become an annual fall Thanksgiving modeled after the Judeo-rooted biblical holiday of Tabernacle celebrating the fall harvest. On September 25, 1789, the House passed a resolution requesting President George Washington to set aside a “day of public humiliation and prayer,” which was to be observed “by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness.”

The biblical roots of Thanksgiving

This day of prayer and thanksgiving to God that Congress called for on September 25, in the words of the great Roger Sherman, was to replicate through the celebration of the Constitution “the solemn thanksgivings and rejoicings which took place in the time of Solomon, after the building of the Temple,” a “precedent in holy writ” he thought “worthy of Christian imitation on the present occasion” (Annals of Congress, 1st Cong., 1st sess., 950).

President Washington issued the proclamation on October 3, to be observed on November 26 that same year. October 3 of that year was actually just one day before the Jewish holiday of Tabernacle, which means its biblical origin was very likely on his mind. Some historians believe the original feast of the Pilgrims in 1621 upon which the holiday was modeled also occurred in early October. It would be reasonable to conclude that the Pilgrims, who referred to their new civilization as “little Israel,” had Biblical Tabernacle in mind.

What was the nature of this public day of prayer? To beseech God “to pardon our national and other transgressions” and “to promote the knowledge and practice of true religion and virtue.” The day was grounded in the self-evident and ubiquitous notion of the time that “it is the duty of all Nations to acknowledge the providence of almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly to implore his protection and favor.”

An enduring American tradition that best characterizes us as a people

The holiday was eventually codified as a regular observance on Thursday at the end of November by Abraham Lincoln in 1863, at the urging of Sarah Josepha Hale. Following in the tradition of Washington, he issued the proclamation on October 3 to be observed on November 26. Hale, “the Godmother of Thanksgiving,” spoke of a fixed date at the end of November because, among other reasons, “harvests of all kinds are gathered in” and the blessings of God are most evident.

Already in 1923, Calvin Coolidge referred to it as a “wise custom” of Americans, from “their earliest days” by “acknowledging each year the bounty with which divine Providence has favored them.” This is why he believed that Thanksgiving Day was “not only one of the oldest but one of the most characteristic observances of our country.”

Why does it capture the essence of our national character more than any other day? As Coolidge wrote in his 1923 proclamation, “On that day, in home and church, in family and in public gatherings, the whole nation has for generations paid the tribute due from grateful hearts for blessings bestowed.” He added the following year that Thanksgiving “has the sanction of antiquity and the approbation of our religious convictions.” “In acknowledging the receipt of divine favor, in contemplating the blessings which have been bestowed upon us, we shall reveal the spiritual strength of the nation.”

Courts use our own history against us and banish God from our lives

September 25, 1789, the day Congress called for Washington’s proclamation, was also the day that Congress passed the Bill of Rights with a joint resolution between the House and Senate, sending it to the states for ratification. So on the very same day that our legislators ordered such a religious prayer of thanksgiving, they passed the First Amendment, which includes the Establishment Clause directing the national government not to establish a religion. Anyone who lived during the time of our Founding clearly understood that this meant just one thing – that government wouldn’t coerce anyone to violate their conscience. As James Madison explained during the initial floor debate on August 20, 1789, Congress should not establish a religion and enforce the legal observation of it by law, nor compel men to worship God in any manner contrary to their conscience.

Yet we now have unelected judges erasing our religious Founding. They use an amendment designed to prevent coercion against conscience to eliminate voluntary recognition of God and religion by our government. Even worse, we have judges establishing paganism as the official religion to downright coerce those who believe in the Bible to violate their conscience with their private property.

Here’s another fun fact of 1789: Just four days prior to President Washington’s October thanksgiving proclamation and four days after both passage of the Bill of Rights and the resolution calling for a day of prayer, the House passed the final version of the Judiciary Act of 1789, which created the entire structure and jurisdiction of the federal judiciary.

No less a figure than John Marshall himself said (Durousseau v. United States, 1810) that implicit in this bill was the exercising of Article III, Section 2, which grants the judiciary only the jurisdiction provided to it by Congress and that this bill placed a “negative on the exercise of such appellate power as is not comprehended within it.”

So let’s get this straight: In the same week that Congress granted the judiciary its jurisdiction, it also passed the Bill of Rights — including the Establishment Clause — and called for a national day of prayer. Now we are told that this same judiciary can remake our culture and borders in every way imaginable by using the Bill of Rights to uproot prayer from our governmental consciousness. It’s gotten so bad that we now have judges saying there’s no religious liberty right to be left alone with your property and conscience, but there is a First Amendment right to immigrate against the consent of an established nation and to perform FGM on someone’s daughter as a “religious” tradition. This is the vile legacy of the disgraceful legal profession that is refuted by the immutable facts of our Founding era, history, and traditions.

We can only turn to God and nowhere else

Many days, it appears that our political problems are insurmountable. Every aspect of our system of governance, sovereignty, culture, history, and traditions has been flipped upside down, made into an Orwellian carcass of the original republic. Nonetheless, although we are so disappointed in what has become of our republic, we must still be thankful that we at least have the freedoms to debate these issues and raise our concerns without being prosecuted for hate speech as in other “western” countries (at least not yet).

Indeed, even in our worst state of affairs, we are still head and shoulders above the rest of the world. As George Washington observed in his 1795 Thanksgiving Proclamation, “When we review the calamities which afflict so many other nations, the present condition of the United States affords much matter of consolation and satisfaction.”

We must use this continued blessing to promote the truth, but in doing so and strategizing our next moves, we must never forget the admonition of Franklin to his colleagues – that a republic cannot be restored without the aid of “the God who governs the affairs of men.”

Despite the sad spiritual and political state of affairs, we must thank God for all the bounty he has given us, blessing this country with unprecedented abundance and wealth. But as Calvin Coolidge noted in his 1925 Thanksgiving Proclamation, not everything is about material things. We must have a spiritual revival. “As we have grown and prospered in material things, so also should we progress in moral and spiritual things,” warned Coolidge. Imagine Coolidge having a vision of today’s Thanksgiving being usurped by the unbridled hedonism and often violence of “Black Friday.”

The only way to maintain our material blessings, restore our political system, and achieve growth in spirituality is by beseeching the Lord of Abraham for guidance in the coming year and thanking him for his existing abundance so that we may merit his blessings. As Coolidge said in 1923, “We have been a most blessed people. We ought to be a most thankful people.”

“Give thanks unto the LORD for He is good, for his kindness endures forever.” —Psalm 136

(For more from the author of “The American Principle: There Can Be No Blessings Without God in Our Lives” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Roberts, Trump Spar in Extraordinary Scrap Over Judges

President Donald Trump and Chief Justice John Roberts clashed Wednesday in an extraordinary public dispute over the independence of America’s judiciary, with Roberts bluntly rebuking the president for denouncing a judge who rejected his migrant asylum policy as an “Obama judge.”

There’s no such thing, Roberts declared in a strongly worded statement contradicting Trump and defending judicial independence. Never silent for long, Trump defended his own comment, tweeting defiantly, “Sorry Justice Roberts.”

The pre-Thanksgiving dustup was the first time that Roberts, the Republican-appointed leader of the federal judiciary, has offered even a hint of criticism of Trump, who has several times blasted federal judges who have ruled against him. (Read more from “Roberts, Trump Spar in Extraordinary Scrap Over Judges” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

A Judge Just Ruled Asylum Claims Must Be Accepted Anywhere Along Border

The White House announced earlier this month that migrants hoping to enter the U.S. could only claim asylum at certain points of entry, not just anywhere along the border. Critics accused President Trump of circumventing Congress and rights groups like the ACLU challenged the decision in court. The opponents have now won a short term victory.

Judge Jon S. Tigar of the United States District Court in San Francisco issued a temporary restraining order on Monday blocking the new rule. . .

President Trump has sounded off on the migrant caravan heading toward the U.S.-Mexico border, calling it an “invasion.” He sent about 5,000 troops to the border to prevent the caravan from entering the U.S.

(Read more from “A Judge Just Ruled Asylum Claims Must Be Accepted Anywhere Along Border” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

The VA Needs a Lot of Help. These Members of Congress Are Going to Work on… the Motto

File this under “proposals to paint the barn while the house is on fire.” Two members of Congress want to change the VA’s motto to be more gender-inclusive, according to a report from Stars and Stripes.

Currently, the department’s motto is a quote from President Abraham Lincoln’s 1865 inaugural address that reads: “To care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow, and his orphan.”

Instead, Reps. Kathleen Rice, D-N.Y., and Brian Mast, R-Fla., want the new motto to read: “To fulfill President Lincoln’s promise to care for those ‘who shall have borne the battle’ and for their families, caregivers, and survivors,” according to the report.

“The brave women who have worn our nation’s uniform and their families deserve to be equally embraced by the motto of the very agency meant to support them,” reads a statement from Rice’s office last week.

However, days after the proposed motto change was announced, six veterans’ groups called for improvements to the quality of care in the department, citing instances that are “nothing short of horrifying,” while thousands of veterans face the prospect of homelessness because the department has been late in sending out their GI Bill payments.

Let’s face facts: With all the help the VA needs to properly do its job of caring for our nation’s heroes, whether or not the motto is inclusive enough for 21st-century sensibilities ought to be at the bottom of the list, if not at the very bottom.

Supposedly people can walk and chew gum at the same time, but we’re talking about the federal government, where even necessary reforms and changes to programs like the VA are infamously slow and where any minor distraction from those necessary reforms has the potential to completely derailed the task at hand.

But, sure, let’s spend time and resources making sure that a quote from President Lincoln doesn’t leave anyone feeling left out. (For more from the author of “The VA Needs a Lot of Help. These Members of Congress Are Going to Work on… the Motto” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Ivanka Trump’s Lawyer Dispels ‘Misinformation’ in Report That She Used Her Personal Email in a Government Role

Peter Mirijanian, a spokesman for Ivanka Trump’s lawyer Abbe Lowell, replied Monday evening to a Washington Post report that the first daughter, who holds the title of assistant to the president, had sent government emails on her private account.

Mirijanian told the Post that Trump had used her personal account before being briefed on ethics rules.

“While transitioning into government, after she was given an official account but until the White House provided her the same guidance they had given others who started before she did, Ms. Trump sometimes used her personal account, almost always for logistics and scheduling concerning her family,” he claimed. . .

He also addressed the comparisons her email use had been inviting with the personal email use of Hillary Clinton. Clinton’s use of personal email on a private server for government business was a large scandal on the 2016 campaign trail.

“To address misinformation being peddled about Ms. Trump’s personal email, she did not create a private server in her house or office,” he wrote, “there was never classified information transmitted, the account was never transferred or housed at Trump Organization, no emails were ever deleted, and the emails have been retained in the official account in conformity with records preservation laws and rules.” (Read more from “Ivanka Trump’s Lawyer Dispels ‘Misinformation’ in Report That She Used Her Personal Email in a Government Role” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

How Trump and House Democrats Can Work Together on Foreign Affairs

Following the 2018 midterms, political observers have begun forecasting dramatic battles between the Democratic House and the Trump administration over the next two years.

They predict that between the congressional investigations of the White House, wrangling with Republicans in the Senate, and political showmanship all around, little governing will actually take place. They may well be right, but for those on either side of the aisle interested in passing meaningful policy into law, there are definitely two areas where President Trump and congressional Democrats could work together: national security and foreign policy. . .

A place to start would be addressing the U.S. military’s ongoing involvement in Yemen. Despite bipartisan pushes for extracting our support from the Saudi-perpetuated humanitarian crisis, Trump has been reluctant to pull assistance from an ally. But there are signs that this obstacle might be eroding in the face of the admission that Saudi officials were complicit in the murder of a U.S. resident in Turkey.

American intervention in a small, strategically unimportant country’s civil war is precisely the kind of costly foreign entanglement Trump campaigned against. Steps can be taken by Congress and the administration to limit support to countries involved in the conflict and remove the boot from the throat of the Yemeni people.

There is also room for positive work on the broader war on terrorism, where the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) — written in the impassioned aftermath of the 9/11 attacks — has long needed revisiting. Leaders in both parties have shown interest in reforming or ending the open-ended authorization for a global war on terror and the Trump administration could demonstrate good governance by collaborating in this process. (Read more from “How Trump and House Democrats Can Work Together on Foreign Affairs” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.