Black Conservatives Take Action in Key Republican Races

As election day creeps closer, the Black Conservative Federation (BFC) is deploying hundreds of black conservatives to campaign in key states for national and local elections. . .

In a statement, BCF said it is committed to its goal of “expanding the Black conservative movement.”

The day was initially supposed to just take place in races in the Washington D.C.-metro area as a way to commemorate its two-year anniversary, but “the idea quickly evolved into a larger partnership with the Republican National Committee and state and local leaders to help ensure conservative candidates have the additional support they need in their final push across the finish line.”

“We’re taking it back old school and in the most grassroots way possible,” stated BCF President Diante Johnson. “Whether it’s phone banking, knocking doors, or sign waving, our goal is to have a Black conservative presence in key areas all around the country. This is an important election and BCF plans to do its part to help spread the red wave.” (Read more from “Black Conservatives Take Action in Key Republican Races” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

The Democrats’ Midterm Motto Seems to Be ‘the Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves’

The Democrats’ midterm motto seems to be: “The beatings will continue until morale improves.”

Last week, Hillary Clinton and Eric Holder suggested that being uncivil and even inflicting violence upon those with whom they disagree is the Democrats’ way forward. This is nothing new.

In total embrace of their inner totalitarian, the Democrat Party leadership has entered the final stages of the logical end to their political game. And just like their economic, social, and foreign policies, the final stage is violence against humanity.

The democratic socialists have called for extreme confiscation of wealth in order to create government programs to shift the economic power away from those who earn money toward those who do not. This leads to anger and resentment in those who produce toward those who do not and eventually to a refusal by the best of the best to play along. The refusal to comply leads to a crippling of the economy, which leads to unrest, which leads to the perfect opportunity for a dictator to take control.

Just this week, the results of President Trump’s tax cuts and lift of Obama’s grossly irresponsible regulatory restrictions and have been made clear. People are buying things again because economic optimism is on the rise. You don’t have that with totalitarian regimes. In fact, one of the key reasons we had such an economic downturn during the Obama presidency was because he told us in word and action that we were no longer going to be a prosperous nation. Obama told us we were going to have to pay out our wealth — that though we are an industrious people, we didn’t deserve to reap the rewards of our efforts. We were supposed to give away our wealth to appease the rest of the world, especially those who were hostile toward us.

The foreign policy of the democratic socialists was displayed in the Obama era. Appeasement of dictators, wholesale abuse of our traditional foreign policy, and high regard for the enemies of our Judeo-Christian civilization — we probably will never know to what extent that the Obama administration sold this nation’s values and paid off its enemies. Any president was going to have a very tough go of it after what the Obama regime put in place.

The democratic socialists have turned education on its head and have rejected the science of biology and accepted the phony-baloney gender-bender agenda. Critics of which have been forced to sit on the sidelines of academia, and all references to God have been expunged from mainstream education in America. Their priorities of exalting certain minorities and women have led to severe resentment in white men in America who have been unfailingly preached to about their privilege and skin color since birth.

College students, emboldened by their extreme narcissism, shut down free speech, screaming epithets and bruising eardrums, provoking people who would otherwise be peaceful. This is the spiral of the totalitarian mindset. In a fake play for victimization, they are trained to provoke and sabotage in order to produce the result of pushing people to their limits.

The democratic socialists provoke, sow discontent, rub raw the resentment and differences between us, embrace dictators, pick the wrong side of everything, exalt the crooked, and kill the innocent, and yet we are to believe that the people who voted against their eight years of downward spiral are the problem?

Every policy coming from the Left increases the likelihood of totalitarianism. Individuals tend to resent that, because we know we are supposed to be free: free to think the way we do, free to act within the law, free to enter into contracts, free to eat lunch without being accosted, free — because we’re Americans.

The path of the democratic socialists is one of violence, and there are no two ways about it. That’s why they are not embarrassed and will not pull away from their violent talk and action. If they somehow win in November based upon their actions on display for all to see, they will think violence is the way forward. If they lose in November, they will think violence is the way forward. They will not learn a lesson. They have only one song and know only one dance. There is no compromise with these people, and there should be no appeasement of them either. (For more from the author of “The Democrats’ Midterm Motto Seems to Be ‘the Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves’” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Sorry, Anti-Gunners, Your Base of Support for Gun Control Is Being Chipped Away Again

Wait—isn’t 60 percent a solid number showing support for stricter gun laws? Yes, but support is dropping and my guess, like what happened after Sandy Hook, is that support will continue to drop until it returns to pre-Newtown levels: 47 percent. And that was with a Democratic president at the helm.

Sandy Hook was a tragic shooting that shook the nation, as did the February shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida, which launched a renewed wave of anti-gun activism. Former students David Hogg, Cameron Kasky, and Emma Gonzalez formed the face of their new movement. Support for gun control reached 25-year highs, but Stephen Gutowski of the Washington Free Beacon noted that support is dropping:

The Gallup poll of 1,019 adults, conducted between Oct. 1 and 10, found 61 percent of respondents support making gun laws stricter. That’s down 6 points from when Gallup asked the same question between March 1 and 8. At the same time support for the idea that gun laws should be kept the same increased from 28 percent to 30 percent and support for the idea they should be made less strict doubled from 4 percent to 8 percent.

Overall, opposition to stricter gun-control laws moved from 32 percent to 38 percent. Two percent of respondents said they had no opinion. (It’s unclear why Gallup’s raw numbers add up to more than 100 percent but the discrepancy is likely the result of rounding.)

Support for stricter gun control has wavered significantly over the last few decades. When Gallup first asked about it in 1990, support for stricter laws came in at an all-time-high of 78 percent. In 2012, support hit an all-time-low of 43 percent. Support for stricter laws has trended back up since 2012, but this month’s numbers may indicate it is receding once again.

(Read more from “Sorry, Anti-Gunners, Your Base of Support for Gun Control Is Being Chipped Away Again” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

This Might Be the Best Thing to Look Forward to in 2020

For those of us already weary from the 2018 midterms (and maybe with some leftover exhaustion from 2016), the thought of jumping back into a presidential election cycle early next year is, well, nothing short of absolutely dreadful.

But there will be at least one silver lining to look forward to during the primaries.

A story over at Roll Call details how potential 2020 Democratic primary contenders like former Vice President Joe Biden and Sens. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., Kamala Harris, D-Calif., and Cory Booker, D-N.J., are already planning some forays into critical battleground territories outside their home turfs in places like Nevada, Ohio, and South Carolina.

This primary race is going to make some great television, folks. Here’s why:

In case anyone forgot in the midterm fog, the 2020 Democratic primary will mean politicians who have so far built their political brands on things like far-left open borders policies (and twisting the history of the Founding to push them); attacking a member of the intelligence community for doing her job after 9/11; all-out socialized medicine; grandstandingly comparing oneself to Spartacus; calling oneself Native American; and insinuating that Christian beliefs disqualifiy someone from an executive branch appointment are going to have to at least try to make their case to folks outside their leftist/liberal strongholds.

Think about it: Kamala Harris trying to sell amnesty policies to voters in Iowa or South Carolina; Elizabeth Warren trying to get past her Native American DNA fail to actual Native Americans in Arizona; Cory Booker trying to get past the “Spartacus” routine in Iowa.

And some of them are going to have a very hard time when they realize just how far-left policies, anti-Trump resistance tactics, and brazen identity politics actually play outside their deep-blue stomping grounds.

It’s going to be like a political hybrid of MTV’s “Road Rules” and Billy Crystal’s 1991 comedy classic “City Slickers.” That is, it’s going to be spectacular. (For more from the author of “This Might Be the Best Thing to Look Forward to in 2020” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Rosie O’Donnell: Send Military to the White House to ‘Get’ Trump

Rosie O’Donnell said on MSNBC Thursday that she wants to send the U.S. military to the White House to “get” President Donald Trump.

O’Donnell made the comments while appearing in a wild segment of Nicolle Wallace’s MSNBC show called “Deadline: White House.” O’Donnell was describing how she was depressed for a year after Trump was elected when she proposed a coup of the presidency.

“What I wrote on Twitter was we should impose martial law until we make sure the Russians weren’t involved in the final tally of the votes. … And people were like, ‘Martial law? What’s wrong with you?’” Rosie opined.

“He wants to send the military to the border,” MSNBC host Wallace quipped about Trump weighing the option of sending the military to the border to deal with the Honduran caravan of illegal aliens traveling toward the border. . .

Rosie, who has professionally feuded with Trump for years, did call for martial law to be imposed soon after Trump’s victory in 2016.

(Read more from “Rosie O’Donnell: Send Military to the White House to ‘Get’ Trump” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Democratic Operative Arrested for Allegedly Attacking Female GOP Campaign Manager

A Democratic operative was arrested in Las Vegas, Nevada on Tuesday night after he allegedly grabbed and shoved a female campaign manager for Republican gubernatorial nominee Adam Laxalt.

Witnesses say 50-year-old Wilfred Michael Stark III, of Falls Church, Virginia, grabbed Kristin Davison by the arm, pushing her into a room, and would not let go. He yelled and shoved a camera and his body at her and Laxalt, according to The Associated Press. The altercation left her with bruises on her arms and neck.

Davidson was arrested by The Las Vegas City Marshals and charged with misdemeanor battery. He was released Wednesday on $1,140 bail, the AP reported. Laxalt’s campaign said Stark works for American Bridge 21st Century, a political group founded by David Brock and funded by George Soros.

This is not the first time Stark has been arrested for his behavior as a political operative. In March, he was arrested for allegedly shoving an aide to Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke — an incident American Bridge said Stark “adamantly” denied, Fox News reports.

He also reportedly followed Rep. Devin Nunes around Capitol Hill in June, prompting the Republican congressman to tweet a photo of what appears to be Stark standing nearby holding up a cell phone. (Read more from “Democratic Operative Arrested for Allegedly Attacking Female GOP Campaign Manager” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Elizabeth Warren Tries Once Again to Explain Her Claim to Be Native American — and It’s Hilarious

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who claimed to be Native American when a DNA study showed she has as little as .09% Indian blood, is still trying to explain away her assertion.

Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat running for re-election who President Trump has dubbed “Pocahontas” for her claim, released the results of the DNA test on Sunday with about three weeks to go before Election Day in an attempt to “begin deflecting the constant taunting from the president and her Senate challengers,” The Boston Globe reported.

“I have an election,” Warren said. “Donald Trump goes in front of crowds multiple times a week to attack me. Both of my opponents have made the same attack. I got this analysis back, and I made it public.”

The move turned out to be a PR disaster. While the mainstream media happily went along with the notion that 1/1,024 heritage actually makes someone Native American, many mocked Warren for the bizarre claim. Trump himself joined in, writing on Twitter: “Now that her claims of being of Indian heritage have turned out to be a scam and a lie, Elizabeth Warren should apologize for perpetrating this fraud against the American Public. Harvard called her ‘a person of color’ (amazing con), and would not have taken her otherwise!”

. . .

“There’s a distinction between citizenship and ancestry. I wish I had been more mindful of that distinction,” she told the Globe. “The tribes and only the tribes determine citizenship. It’s their right as a matter of sovereignty, and they exercise that in the ways they choose to exercise it. I respect that distinction.” (Read more from “Elizabeth Warren Tries Once Again to Explain Her Claim to Be Native American — and It’s Hilarious” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

4 Critical Unanswered Questions About Jamal Khashoggi

It has been over two weeks since Jamal Khashoggi disappeared in Istanbul, Turkey, on October 2. While a quick search for Jamal Khashoggi will result in thousands of new daily articles on the latest details in his case, we still do not have answers to the most basic questions surrounding his likely death.

How did Khashoggi establish U.S. residency?

We still do not know how Khashoggi managed to immediately establish U.S. residency in June 2017, following his self-exile from Saudi Arabia.

It’s quite shocking that a man with direct connections to the founders of al Qaeda and who openly supported and rooted for the U.S.-designated terrorist organization Hamas was able to skip the line and acquire a green card in such a short time.

Perhaps Khashoggi was helped by several influential backers. He had at least one billionaire patron in the controversial Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, who has several connections to American companies and government figures.

Khashoggi did spend his college years in the United States, graduating from Indiana State University in 1983. It’s unclear whether that helped him establish residency.

How did Khashoggi cut to the front of the line?

How did Jamal Khashoggi lose his life?

Turkish and Qatari media outlets have insisted for weeks, without providing evidence, that Khashoggi was a victim of torture and brutal dismemberment by Saudi officials. The state-sponsored news outlets continue to repeat the claims, citing audio and video footage of Khashoggi’s supposed execution. Yet following his October 2 disappearance, none of that reported evidence has seen the light of day.

It’s safe, at this point, to assume that Khashoggi is no longer with us. However, we still have no idea what exactly happened to him after he entered the consulate in Istanbul. Was Khashoggi the victim of a botched rendition? Was he brutally murdered? That remains entirely unknown.

Why is there a media blackout on Khashoggi’s radicalism?

From his decades-long relationship with Osama bin Laden to his support for terror until his last days, Jamal Khashoggi wished death upon whom he perceived as his enemies and wanted to instigate violent revolutions in the Middle East. These simple facts are readily available in publications such as Conservative Review, The Federalist, Frontpage Mag, and in other new media sites, but are very difficult to find in the pages of legacy media publications.

His Arabic writings and commentary are readily available for all to read. They reveal his clear ideology as a regressive Islamist who followed the Muslim Brotherhood playbook on overthrowing America’s Gulf allies and waging war against Israel.

Khashoggi’s writings have on several occasions expressed support for the U.S.-designated terrorist group Hamas. He was also staunch defender of al Qaeda co-founder Abdullah Azzam.

Moreover, Khashoggi’s tweets are rife with anti-Semitism. He excused Palestinian terrorism as a reaction to “Jewish usurpers.” He hated Israel in its entirety, hoping that it would one day “die by force.” Khashoggi also mitigated the importance of the Holocaust, comparing it to the Palestinian “Nakba.”

The New York Times, Washington Post, and countless more outlets have published hour-by-hour updates on the Khashoggi situation. Yet hardly any legacy media publications have found the space to recount his well-documented radicalism. Why is that?

Why did the Washington Post hire Khashoggi?

Mr. Khashoggi began writing for the Washington Post in September 2017, only a couple months after he moved to the United States.

We know that he was a virulent critic of President Trump. Khashoggi came on as a “Global Opinions” columnist following his claim that he was banned from Saudi Arabia for criticizing Riyadh’s relationship with the new president. Was Khashoggi hired to provide an international angle to the paper’s anti-Trump resistance?

There’s also the reality that the Left has become very cozy with the Muslim Brotherhood and other regressive Islamist groups. It’s possible that the Khashoggi hiring was simply more evidence of the Left’s sympathy for Islamists. Or did one of his billionaire patrons or U.S.-based contacts use connections to secure the gig for Khashoggi?

With so much at stake, it’s time to get to the bottom of these critical questions surrounding the Khashoggi affair. (For more from the author of “4 Critical Unanswered Questions About Jamal Khashoggi” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Meanwhile, Jeff Sessions Is Quietly Tackling Hezbollah and Ms-13 in Our Backyard

For far too long, our foreign policy, counterterrorism apparatus, and intelligence assets have been almost exclusively directed at threats in the Middle East. But what about the drug cartels, transnational gangs, and Hezbollah in the Western Hemisphere operating in our own backyard and coming over the border? After all, the purpose of foreign policy is our national security.

The Obama administration spent years covering up the threat Hezbollah and the drug cartels pose to our people right here inside our own borders. Now the Justice Department, led by Jeff Sessions, is making transnational gangs and the transnational crime that funds terrorism on our own shores a priority.

While we were refereeing endless Islamic civil wars halfway around the world, the Obama administration turned a blind eye to Hezbollah’s billion-dollar crime industry in our own hemisphere that is funding terror, often from businesses of Shiite immigrants to the U.S. In a major expose in Politico earlier this year, it was revealed that Obama shut down Operation Cassandra, the join counterterror and crime task force designed to disrupt Hezbollah in Latin America – all to appease Iran and pave the road for the nuclear deal.

“In its determination to secure a nuclear deal with Iran, the Obama administration derailed an ambitious law enforcement campaign targeting drug trafficking by the Iranian-backed terrorist group Hezbollah, even as it was funneling cocaine into the United States,” wrote Josh Meyer in one of Politico’s greatest pieces of journalism ever. Since then, a record number of people have died from cocaine, even as deaths from other drugs have plateaued.

Ironically, it was none other than the infamous Bruce Ohr who was put in charge of the operation that was undermined before it could do any work. That in itself should indicate how important Hezbollah’s Latin America operation is to Iran’s geopolitical goals: much more important to our national security and border security than, say, the Yemeni civil war.

Well, what a difference a new attorney general makes. Earlier this week, Jeff Sessions designated MS-13, Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion (CJNG), Sinaloa Cartel, Clan del Golfo, and Lebanese Hezbollah as transnational crime organizations (TCOs). He organized a Transnational Organized Crime Task Force designed to coordinate activities between drug agents, law enforcement, counterterrorism, and intelligence assets to disrupt the full spectrum of their activities in our hemisphere. Terrorism is increasingly funded through transnational crime, most prominently the drug trade, and all of these organizations pose a threat either on our own soil or to our border through the flow of Middle Eastern and Latin American migrants controlled by gangs and drug cartels – with Hezbollah lurking in the background.

Former DEA Special Operations Division head Derek Maltz told me he is heartened by the move and hopes it will finally rectify the mistakes of the past. The key to not repeating the failures of the past is cross-agency unity and information sharing, according to Maltz. “The Trump administration inherited a dysfunctional mess in regards to the transnational organized crime threats to America. It’s great to see leadership in action with the public announcements yesterday. Now we need focus, interagency cooperation, accountability, and results. The best and brightest in the U.S. have the potential to shut these crime and terror networks down only if they unite.”

Maltz’s division was at the center of the investigation into hundreds of used car lots owned by Shiite extremists on our own soil. These businesses were being funneled extra cash from Hezbollah’s banking empire to purchase extra used cars here in the U.S. In a circuitous laundering operation, those cars were then sent to lawless West African countries and resold, the proceeds used for drug operations both in Europe and in the Western Hemisphere. Much of the funds, of course, were used to purchase weapons for the endless struggles in the Middle East. The second part of the Politico expose provided a useful infographic showing the flow of crime, drugs, and terror. Ayman Joumaa, a Hezbollah operative and a dual Colombian-Lebanese citizen, was at the nexus of this operation and was indicted for laundering drugs and contraband for the brutal Las Zetas cartel. “This is two for the price of one,” says Maltz. “They immigrate to America, use our generosity against us to fund terror, and then make more money off a drug trade that is also killing our youth.”

The Obama administration did nothing to follow up on the work of these agencies, and no other indictments have followed. None of these car lot owners have even been deported.

Given that Hezbollah sits at the nexus of special interest alien smuggling to our border, drugs, gangs, and subversion activities in Latin America, this designation by Sessions will have positive effects on our allies in Latin America. One of the forgotten trends in Latin America is that a number of countries have recently elected pro-Trump governments willing to work with us on combatting Iran’s influence and fighting organized crime and drug trafficking. Brazil, Argentina, Peru, and Guatemala are some good examples.

Joseph Humire, executive director of the Center for a Secure Free Society, served as an expert witness in a first-of-its-kind anti-Hezbollah trial in Peru and told me this task force will have a very positive effect on sharing and learning intel from our allies there:

“Designating Hezbollah as a Transnational Criminal Organization (TCO) allows our regional partners in Latin America to increase their focus on the crime-terror organization. While most Latin American countries don’t have adequate legal frameworks to deal with foreign terrorist organizations, they have significantly improved their capabilities (legal and operational) to deal with TCOs. This puts us in sync with our southern neighbors to more effectively dismantle Hezbollah’s crime-terror network.”

Many countries in Latin America and in West Africa that are home to Hezbollah’s crime syndicates will be more likely to cooperate with us now that we are going after crime activities that adversely affect them. Moreover, given that organized crime and drug trafficking are now the fuel of terrorism, drying up their networks is the most effective way of combatting terror, much more so than nation-building and refereeing civil wars.

By simply using soft power to clamp down on criminal aliens, terror financing, and drug trafficking, we can stop a huge amount of death and mayhem while also remaking our foreign policy. Clearly, this has been a priority for Sessions. On my podcast several months ago, Sessions said, “We also have people who get in here and make money off the United States and then send money to terrorist groups. … We’ve got a string of cases we are continually prosecuting. … Some of them are recent immigrants. … This is a top, top priority for us.”

The designation of MS-13 and the drug cartels as TCOs is also welcome news. Todd Bensman, a former intelligence analyst for the Texas Department of Public Safety and senior national security fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies, told me that the designation will net quick results. “Designating them as a TCO is very significant because it will now flag any MS-13 member crossing the border and would trigger a number of security measures that would have otherwise not been triggered,” said Bensman in an interview with CR. “This allows intelligence personnel inside the U.S. to notify cops in their internal systems who come into contact with these individuals, even if they are pulled over for a broken tail light.” While sanctuary cities will ignore a run-of-the-mill drunk driving illegal alien, it’s hard for them to ignore an alert that a person is essentially on a terror list.

The mix of drug cartels, MS-13, and Hezbollah is the ultimate threat to our homeland, much more so than Afghanistan or the civil wars in Syria and Yemen. Just this week, Guatemalan President Jimmy Morales said that 100 known terrorists were arrested in his country and deported. Remember, Guatemala is the choke point for migration to our border, and there have been hundreds of Middle Easterners caught at Laredo, Texas, this year. Also, according to ICE, 85 percent of the family units coming through the Yuma sector are from Guatemala, and we saw a record number of such incursions in September. To focus on Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, and Somalia as the terrorist threat and ignore our border is insane, especially when we bring in tens of thousands of immigrants from these countries, among them people who fund these very wars with fraud and organized crime on our own shores.

The broader lesson is that we need not discover the impossible solution to securing the sovereignty of Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, and Somalia to keep us safe from Islamic terrorism. We merely need to assume control of our own sovereignty through our border, immigration policy, and banking system, while working closely with our neighbors. “This is much cheaper, more effective, and doesn’t cost us lives,” said Maltz, who lost a brother in Afghanistan.

Overall, Jeff Sessions has been leading more than most other Cabinet members on discernable policy outcomes. Whether it’s crime, drugs, terrorism, immigration, religious liberty, or affirmative action, Sessions has been changing policies in the most meaningful way. He’s even pushing back against judicial supremacy. For those disappointed in the way he is handling Mueller, just remember that the Mueller probe will be over, and it would be a shame to lose all this progress for a RINO who would likely take his place. National security policy, when done right, should trump everything else. (For more from the author of “Meanwhile, Jeff Sessions Is Quietly Tackling Hezbollah and Ms-13 in Our Backyard” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Elon Musk Has Reached a Settlement, but Tesla’s Troubles Are Far From Over

A federal judge has approved a settlement between the Securities Exchange Commission and Tesla’s Elon Musk after he tweeted in August that he had secured funding to take the company private at $420 a share — a claim that proved not to be true and has cost the company and investors about $12 billion in valuation, according to MarketWatch.

U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan signed orders on Tuesday requiring Musk to step down from his role as Tesla chairman and to have a lawyer oversee and approve all tweets about Tesla to ensure he does not tweet misleading information again. The settlement also requires Musk and Telsa to pay $20 million each to investors who lost money because of Musk’s tweets. Musk still gets to retain his position as Tesla’s CEO, but Tesla’s troubles are far from over.

The SEC is reportedly still investigating the car company to determine whether they misled investors about the reason for and extent of their Model 3 production delays. In 2016, Musk predicted that “as many 200,000 Model 3s would be made in the second half of 2017,” but this was scaled back to 20,000 models. The company fell short of the reduced amount, producing a mere 2,700 cars in 2017. . .

In July, Tesla told investors it had met its goal of assembling 5,000 per week, although the company has been plagued with delivery troubles. Customers who purchased a Model 3 months ago are still waiting.

Musk claimed many of these cars have already been built, but the company is having difficulties handling the logistics of delivering them. Last month, Tesla asked volunteers to deliver cars to customers for free and walk them through some of the features, which makes one wonder if the company has the cash to deliver cars customers have already paid for. (Read more from “Elon Musk Has Reached a Settlement, but Tesla’s Troubles Are Far From Over” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.