Vegas-Shooting Security Guard Missing? Cops Say No

The plot thickened Wednesday in the race to find Jesus Campos, the “hero” security guard who took a shot in the leg from gunman Stephen Paddock during the worst mass shooting in modern U.S. history.

That was more than two weeks ago and Campos, first lauded as a hero and later surrounded by controversy when the official police timeline of the event was changed, still hasn’t surfaced.

For days, Fox News, ABC News, Newsweek and other mainstream news outlets have been reporting that Campos has been missing since Thursday night.

But the Las Vegas Metro Police Department told WND on Tuesday that’s not true.

Officer Larry Hatfield, spokesman for the department, said “nope,” when asked if Campos was a missing person. (Read more from “Vegas-Shooting Security Guard Missing? Cops Say No” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Media Silent as Government Uses Vegas Shooting to Push Bill Allowing Warrantless Searches

As the mainstream media provides relentless coverage of the Harvey Weinstein Hollywood sex scandal, there is one major piece of legislation it is ignoring, and if passed, it will have massive repercussions for all Americans.

More than 40 organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the Freedom of the Press Foundation, have joined together to condemn the USA Liberty Act, a trendy name for a dangerous bill that reauthorizes and creates additional loopholes for Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

In a letter to the House Judiciary Committee, the coalition noted that one of the most obvious problems with the USA Liberty Act is that it fails to address concerns with the “backdoor search loophole,” which allows the government to “conduct warrantless searches for the information of individuals who are not targets of Section 702, including U.S. citizens and residents.”

The USA Liberty Act departs from the recommendation made by the President’s Review Group on Surveillance, appropriations amendments that have previously passed the House, and urgings of civil society organizations, which would have required a probable cause warrant prior to searching the Section 702 database for information about a U.S. citizen or resident absent narrow exceptions. As written, it raises several concerns. First, the bill’s most glaring deficiency is that it does not require a warrant to access content in cases where the primary purpose is to return foreign intelligence. This is an exception that threatens to swallow the rule.

Not surprisingly, the USA Liberty Act claims that it will “better protect Americans’ privacy” by requiring the government to have “a legitimate national security purpose” before searching an individual’s database. Then when they do have that purpose established, they will be required to “obtain a court order based on probable cause to look at the content of communications, except when lives or safety are threatened, or a previous probable cause-based court order or warrant has been granted.”

However, as The Free Thought Project previously reported, what the USA Liberty Act does not advertise is the fact that the FBI’s “legitimate national security purpose” could be justified by just about any reason the agency chooses to give, and agents will only need supervisory authority in order to search Americans’ metadata.

As the coalition noted in its letter, “the bill’s current language leaves room for the government to conduct queries and access content for law enforcement purposes without a warrant,” which should be considered a direct violation of the Fourth Amendment.

The current language does not make clear that the government must have a warrant to access content for law enforcement searches where the purpose may not be to specifically obtain evidence of a crime, or in cases where there may be a dual foreign intelligence and criminal purpose. As such, the bill could still permit the government to conduct queries and access content without a warrant in cases involving criminal investigations and prosecutions.

The coalition also criticized the USA Liberty Act’s broad consent and emergency exceptions, noting that, “the emergency provision does not parallel analogous provisions in FISA and require imminence or that the government go back to the FISA court for a warrant after beginning the emergency surveillance.”

While the government claims the purpose of FISA is to allow surveillance on the communications of foreign targets who were suspected terrorists, it should be noted that the law has been used to spy on the communications of innocent Americans—despite the practice being ruled illegal—and any reauthorization of the law will only allow the practice to continue under the guise of “preventing terrorism.”

When the USA Patriot Act was passed in 2001, and the USA Freedom Act was passed in 2015, the U.S. government used fear-based propaganda disguised in the form of All-American titled legislation, which was spread without contest by the mainstream media. Section 702 is set to expire on Dec. 31, 2017, which means that Americans will likely see the same game come into play as the government prepares to pass the USA Liberty Act—a bill that is the opposite of its namesake. (For more from the author of “Media Silent as Government Uses Vegas Shooting to Push Bill Allowing Warrantless Searches” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Menendez Tried to End His Corruption Trial. His Judge Wasn’t Buying It.

The federal judge overseeing New Jersey Democratic Sen. Bob Menendez’s criminal trial declined to dismiss the charges against him Monday, after defense lawyers argued that the prosecution had failed to make its case.

U.S. District Judge William Walls rejected Menendez’s claim that the prosecution’s arguments were too broad to meet the narrow definition of corruption in federal law.

The U.S. Supreme Court established in a 2016 case that public officials only violate anti-corruption laws when they accept gifts, payments, or benefits in exchange for a specific and official act. Menendez’s lawyers argued that the government failed to show that the senator took specific and official actions as the result of a donor’s gifts. Prosecutors have put forward a “stream of benefits” theory of their case, in which they say Menendez performed favors for a donor over a period of years in exchange for lavish benefits like vacations and charter flights. Though the senator’s acts and the donor’s gifts may not chronologically coincide, prosecutors say their relationship was still corrupt. (Read more from “Menendez Tried to End His Corruption Trial. His Judge Wasn’t Buying It.” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

The Memo That a Russian Lawyer Took to the Trump Tower Meeting Is Finally Out

A four-page memo that has been a central focus of the Trump Tower meeting last June between Donald Trump Jr. and a Russian attorney has finally been released.

Foreign Policy magazine published the document, which Russian attorney Natalia Veselnitskaya took into the June 9, 2016 meeting, which was arranged by Trump Jr. and attended by Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner and then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

The document, and the meeting, have become a focus for congressional and federal investigators looking into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government. The meeting has raised questions about collusion because Trump Jr. accepted it after an acquaintance contacted him promising that a “Russian government attorney” would provide damaging information about Hillary Clinton . . .

Veselnitskaya’s memo, which Foreign Policy obtained from a Russian news station that recently interviewed the lawyer, suggests that little information about Clinton was provided to the Trump campaign. (Read more from “The Memo That a Russian Lawyer Took to the Trump Tower Meeting Is Finally Out” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

CONFIRMED: Comey Drafted Statement on Clinton Months Before Investigation Ended

The FBI released emails Monday confirming that former FBI Director James Comey drafted statements regarding the Hillary Clinton email investigation months before the probe was closed.

The bureau released a file entitled “Drafts of Director Comey’s July 5, 2016 Statement Regarding Email Server Investigation,” to its Freedom of Information Act website. The file contains an email Comey sent May 2, 2016, to several FBI officials regarding the Clinton email probe, which was referred to internally by the codename “Midyear Exam.”

The draft statement was first revealed in late August by Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley and South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, two members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The Republicans questioned whether Comey’s draft statement indicated that he had arrived at a conclusion about the Clinton investigation months before he interviewed the former secretary of state and numerous other witnesses. The draft was also prepared before the Justice Department had made immunity deals with Clinton aides Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson. (Read more from “CONFIRMED: Comey Drafted Statement on Clinton Months Before Investigation Ended” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Wikileaks Founder Rips Into ‘Creepy’ Hillary

Julian Assange has launched a personal attack on Hillary Clinton, accusing her of lying and displaying a “cold creepiness” after the former US presidential candidate told the ABC the WikiLeaks founder is a “tool of Russian intelligence”.

In an exclusive interview with Four Corners, Mrs Clinton alleged Mr Assange colluded with a Russian intelligence operation to disrupt the 2016 US election and damage her candidacy for president . . .

The Wikileaks founder, who has been living inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London since 2012, hit back this morning, tweeting that Mrs Clinton was “not a credible person”.

Tweeting a link to the Four Corners interview, Mr Assange said there was “something wrong” with her.

“It is not just her constant lying. It is not just that she throws off menacing glares and seethes thwarted entitlement,” he said. “Something much darker rides along with it. A cold creepiness rarely seen.” (Read more from “Wikileaks Founder Rips Into ‘Creepy’ Hillary” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Trump Urges Hillary: ‘Please Run Again!’

The 2016 election goes on.

On Monday, President Donald Trump gleefully urged former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to run for president again in 2020. He also suggested that her stance on professional athletes protesting racial inequality during the national anthem is an example of why she lost the election in November.

“Is she going to run? I hope. Hillary, please run again! Go ahead,” the president said during a news conference with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

He then said Clinton’s support of NFL players who choose to kneel during the national anthem was “wrong.” During a public appearance in England, Clinton reportedly defended the players’ right to demonstrate against racial injustice, saying it does not go against the national anthem or the American flag. (Read more from “Trump Urges Hillary: ‘Please Run Again!'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Vegas Shooter Is New Idol for ISIS in U.S.

The Islamic State, also called ISIS, may or may not have had anything to do with the Las Vegas attack that killed 58 innocent Americans and injured 500 on Oct. 1, but one thing is certain.

The crumbling Islamic caliphate has been offered a propaganda cherry by the FBI.

By claiming credit for Paddock’s grandiose attack at the same time the FBI has been silent on the shooter’s motive, this gives a window of opportunity for an ISIS propaganda coup, according to national-security experts.

In the world of international terror, propaganda success means new recruits and new violence against Western targets – and ISIS appears to be positioning itself for both post Vegas.

For example, just this weekend ISIS used the Vegas attack in a chilling appeal for “lone wolves” to take sniper shots at American motorists traveling down highways and to lay small bombs in rural roadways. (Read more from “Vegas Shooter Is New Idol for ISIS in U.S.” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Taliban Hostage’s Ex-Wife Has Al-Qaida Ties, Once Justified 9/11

Former Taliban hostage and Canadian citizen Joshua Boyle’s ex-wife’s father and brother had deep connections to al-Qaida and Osama Bin-Laden.

Boyle’s ex-wife Zaynab Khadr is the daughter of Ahmed Said Khadr and brother of Omar Khadr. Her father Ahmed was a veteran of the Afghan war in the late 1980s against the Soviet Union and is thought to have been a founding member of the al-Qaida terrorist group. His son, Omar was captured by U.S. forces during a firefight and spent 10 years in Guantanamo bay.

Omar was infamously granted a multi-million dollar settlement from the Canadian government for his detention despite admitting to killing a U.S. soldier in combat.

Boyle was married to Zaynab for approximately one year. He and his current wife Caitlin Coleman along with their three children were rescued by Pakistani Security Forces from the Taliban after nearly 5 years of captivity Wednesday . . .

Of the 9/11 attackers she said, “I don’t think whoever did that really wanted to kill all these people, or to kill people who had nothing to do with anything. But he really wanted to hit the American government where it will hurt it,” adding: “I mean sometimes innocent people pay the price … The Iraqis who hated Saddam are being killed nowadays for I don’t know for what reason, although they hated Saddam and they probably had nothing against the states and they are still dying for it. Most of the time innocent people are paying the price.” (Read more from “Taliban Hostage’s Ex-Wife Has Al-Qaida Ties, Once Justified 9/11” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

George Soros Funded a Study of White Working-Class Voters Who Support Trump. Here’s What He Found

A recently-released research study sheds light on the values of white working-class voters in the United States and the reasons these voters strongly supported Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election . . .

Open Society Foundations, a network of political organizations controlled by left-wing billionaire George Soros, funded the study . . .

Here is what they found:

In 2016, Trump was the ‘hope and change’ candidate for white working-class voters.

The participants in the study say they view Trump as “strong” and “hardworking.” (Read more from “George Soros Funded a Study of White Working-Class Voters Who Support Trump. Here’s What He Found” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.