A Form Letter to Send to Companies Donating to Planned Parenthood

images (72)Before sending the below letter, make sure you add the information italicized and in brackets below. If you’re looking for the names and addresses of companies that donate to Planned Parenthood, please click HERE.

____________________________________________________

[Insert date]

[Insert your name and address]

[Insert corporate name]

[Insert corporate address]

Dear [Insert corporate name],

We were very disappointed to recently discover that your corporation is involved in helping fund the barbaric practices of Planned Parenthood. Although our hard earned dollars have been spent on ***list products you have previously purchased from the company*** in the past, that ends today.

As you undoubtedly know by now, a number of undercover videos reveal that Planned Parenthood is actively involved in the marketing of dead baby parts derived from the hundreds of thousands of abortions committed within their facilities. The videos even suggest that Planned Parenthood employees are murdering babies in failed abortions and subsequently selling their parts.

Although the funding of any group committing the murder of the unborn is reason enough to boycott your business, sponsoring an organization involved in the grotesque body parts trade is especially horrifying to consumers like us.

Until you cut-off 100% of all direct support (and any indirect support through third party groups) for Planned Parenthood, my family and I promise that we will no longer purchase any of your products and/or services. And we will do everything we can to notify our larger communities about what you are doing.

Please let me know at your earliest convenience as to whether you will cut off ALL funding to Planned Parenthood.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

Here are the Companies Donating to Planned Parenthood

planned-parenthood-dixon-ca3Here are the companies that are donating millions of dollars to Planned Parenthood. Please write them stating that you will not buy their products or services until they stop their funding of this barbaric organization. For your convenience, we have prepared a form letter HERE. And if you need more information on why Planned Parenthood must be shut down, please click HERE.

________________________________________

Adobe Systems Incorporated
345 Park Avenue
San Jose, CA 95110-2704
408-536-6000
408-537-6000 (fax)

American Express
4315 S 2700 W
Salt Lake City, UT 84184-0440
1‑800‑954‑0559

Avon
5389 East Provident Drive
Cincinnati, OH 45246
800-500-2866

Bath & Body Works
7 Limited Parkway East
Reynoldsburg, OH 43068
1-800-756-5005

Ben & Jerry’s
30 Community Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403-6828
802-846-1500

Boeing
100 North Riverside
Chicago, Illinois 60606
312-544-2000

Clorox
1221 Broadway
Oakland, CA 94612
510-271-7000

Converse
1 High St. #6 North
Andover, MA 01845
1-978-983-3300

Deutsche Bank
60 Wall Street
New York, NY, USA
212-250-2500

Dockers
1415 Murfreesboro Road, Suite 600
Nashville, TN 37217
800-636-2574

Energizer
533 Maryville University Drive
St. Louis, MO 63141
800-383-7323

Expedia Headquarters
333 108th Ave. NE
Bellevue, WA 98004
1-425-679-7200

ExxonMobil
5959 Las Colinas Boulevard
Irving, Texas 75039-2298
972-444-1000

Fannie Mae
900 Wisconsin Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20016-2892
1-800-732-6643

Groupon
600 W. Chicago Ave.
Chicago, IL 60654
1-312-676-5773

Intuit
2700 Coast Ave.
Mountain View, CA 94043
1-800-4INTUIT

Johnson & Johnson
1 Johnson And Johnson Plaza
New Brunswick, NJ 08933
732-524-0400

La Senza
5405 Eglinton Ave West, #106
Toronto, ON
1-888-527-3692

Levi Strauss
1155 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111 U.S.A
415-501-6000
415-501-7112 (fax)

Liberty Mutual
175 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116
888-398-8924

Macy’s
151 West 34th Street
New York, NY 10001
212-494-3000

March of Dimes
1275 Mamaroneck Avenue
White Plains, NY 10605
914-997-4488

Microsoft
15010 NE 36th Street
Redmond, WA 98052
425-703-6214

Morgan Stanley
1585 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
888-454-3965

Nike
One Bowerman Dr.
Beaverton, OR 97005
503-671-6453

Oracle
500 Oracle Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
650-506-7000

PepsiCo
700 Anderson Hill Road
Purchase, NY 10577
800-433-2652

Pfizer
235 East 42nd Street
New York, NY 10017
212-733-2323

Progressive Insurance
6300 Wilson Mills Rd.
Mayfield Village, Ohio 44143
800-876-5581

Starbucks
PO Box 6363
Dover, DE 19905-6363
800-782-7282

Susan G. Komen
5005 LBJ Freeway
Suite 250
Dallas, TX 75244
877-465-6636

Unilever
800 Sylvan Avenue
Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632
800-298-5018

United Way
701 N. Fairfax Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
703-836-7112

Verizon
140 West St
New York, NY 10013
212-395-1000

Wells Fargo
420 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA
800-869-3557
415-975-7745 (fax)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Ben Carson Pro-Life? Candidate Makes Troubling Statements Regarding Aborted Fetal Tissue for Research, Vaccinations, Referred Women to Abortionists

2B571C0000000578-0-image-a-1_1439508990720Ben Carson Used Aborted Fetal Tissue in Research, No Apologies

By Wills Robinson. Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson has defended using aborted fetuses for medical research – even though he has slammed Planned Parenthood for a similar practice.

The neurosurgeon conducted research in 1992 using two fetuses aborted in the ninth and 17th week of gestation, but insists it does contradict his pro-life stance.

He has also claimed it does not go against his call to take away funding from the embattled organisation, which has been under intense scrutiny since undercover videos of staff members discussing the use of fetuses in scientific research surfaced.

He continued by saying: ‘There is absolutely no contradiction between the research I worked on in 1992 and my pro-life views.

‘The issue of fetal tissue has everything to do with how the tissue is acquired. My primary responsibility in that research was operating on people to obtain diseased tissue for comparison to banked tissue samples. (Read more from “Pro-Life Fraud? Ben Carson Used Aborted Fetal Tissue in Research, No Apologies; Also Opposes Religious Exemptions for Vaccinations Containing Aborted Fetal Cells” HERE)

____________________________________________________________

Ben Carson: No ‘Philosophical’ or ‘Religious’ Exemptions for Vaccinations, Even Those Derived from Aborted Fetal Cell Lines

By Breitbart News. Dr. Ben Carson, a likely 2016 GOP presidential contenders, believes there should be no “philosophical” or “religious” exemptions for vaccinations.

“Although I strongly believe in individual rights and the rights of parents to raise their children as they see fit, I also recognize that public health and public safety are extremely important in our society,” Carson told The Hill. “Certain communicable diseases have been largely eradicated by immunization policies in this country and we should not allow those diseases to return by foregoing safe immunization programs, for philosophical, religious or other reasons when we have the means to eradicate them.”

The retired neurosurgeon’s comments came hours after New Jersey Governor Chris Christie and Sen. Rand Paul, both of whom are likely 2016 presidential candidates and potential rivals, stirred up controversy with their takes on vaccinations after the Disneyland measles outbreak.

On Monday, Christie called for a need for “balance” regarding vaccination before his office immediately clarified Christie’s comments, saying there is “no question” that kids should be vaccinated against a disease like measles.

Paul said he could not understand why his belief that most vaccinations should be “voluntary” is in any way “controversial.” (Read more from this story HERE)

____________________________________________________________

Ben Carson Defends Use of Fetal Tissue for Research

By David Weigel. Ben Carson defended the use of fetal tissue for medical research Thursday, after a blog published excerpts of a 1992 paper describing work the neurosurgeon-turned-presidential candidate carried out using aborted fetuses. In an interview with The Washington Post, Carson called the revelation “desperate,” and ignorant of the way medical research was carried out.

“You have to look at the intent,” Carson said before beginning a campaign swing through New Hampshire. “To willfully ignore evidence that you have for some ideological reason is wrong. If you’re killing babies and taking the tissue, that’s a very different thing than taking a dead specimen and keeping a record of it.”

Carson, who has risen in primary polls since last week’s debate, is among the Republicans who’ve condemned Planned Parenthood after undercover videos revealed executives in the organization coldly discussing the extraction and distribution of tissue from aborted fetuses. In a July interview on Fox News, after the first videos broke, Carson said that there was “nothing that can’t be done without fetal tissue” and that babies aborted at 17 weeks were clearly human beings.

That inspired Jen Gunter to excavate a 1992 paper, co-authored by Carson, in which doctors described how they applied “human choroid plexus ependyma and nasal mucosa from two fetuses aborted in the ninth and 17th week of gestation.” That, wrote Gunter, was quite the contrast from Carson’s 2015 denunciation of fetal tissue research.

“Could he think his own research was useless?” Gunter asked. “If it was non-contributory to the field why was it published? Maybe he forgot that he’d done the research on fetal tissue?” (Read more from this story HERE)
____________________________________________________________

Dr. Carson Referred Women to Abortionists

Republicans most trust Dr. Ben Carson and Mike Huckabee to handle the issue of abortion, according to a recent CNN poll. However, a series of statements from Carson’s campaign, and from Dr. Carson himself, have led to questions about the clarity of his pro-life views about when life begins, how RU-486 works, and his views on experimenting with aborted fetal tissue, among other issues.

On Tuesday, the Carson campaign defended his decision to refer women to abortionists if the child suffered from fetal deformities. (Read more from this story HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Poll: Majority Believe Clinton Lied About Emails

GettyImages-484059782-Hillary-Clinton-SnapchatBy Mark Hensch. A majority of Americans believe Hillary Clinton lied about having sensitive national intelligence on her private email server, a new poll finds.

Fifty-eight percent of voters believe Clinton “knowingly lied” last March by claiming her personal email server lacked any classified information, according to a Fox News poll released a Friday.

Another 33 percent believe there is “another explanation” for having “top-secret” information on the device.

Most also think the Democratic presidential candidate endangered the U.S. by using a private server while at the State Department.

The poll found that 54 percent feel Clinton’s use of the device jeopardized national security, while 37 percent don’t think her decision threatened America’s safety. (Read more from “Poll: Majority Believe Clinton Lied About Emails” HERE)

______________________________________________________

Top Secret Clinton Emails Include Drone Talk

By Bradley Klapper and Ken Dilanian. Neither of the two emails sent to Hillary Rodham Clinton now labeled by intelligence agencies as “top secret” contained information that would jump out to experts as particularly sensitive, according to several government officials.

One included a discussion of a U.S. drone strike, part of a covert program that is widely known and discussed. A second conversation could have improperly referred to highly classified material, but it also could have reflected information collected independently, U.S. officials who have reviewed the correspondence told The Associated Press.

Still, it’s looking increasingly likely the issue of whether Clinton mishandled classified information on her home-brew email server will have significant political implications in the 2016 presidential campaign.

Clinton, who has been seen from the outset as the front-runner for the Democratic nomination, agreed this week to turn over to the FBI the private server she used as secretary of state. And Republicans in Congress have seized on the involvement of federal law enforcement in the matter as a sign she was negligent in handling the nation’s secrets.

On Monday, the inspector general for the 17 spy agencies that make up what is known as the intelligence community told Congress that two of 40 emails, in a random sample of 30,000 messages that Clinton gave the State Department for review, contained information deemed “Top Secret,” one of the government’s highest levels of classification. (Read more from this story HERE)

______________________________________________________

Clinton’s Team Went From Nonchalant to Nervous Over E-Mail Controversy

By Carol D. Leonnig, Karen Tumulty and Rosalind S. Helderman. Late last month, Hillary Rodham Clinton stood before a line of television cameras at a rural Iowa campaign stop to deny reports that she had sent sensitive information over her private e-mail system.

“I’m confident that I never sent or received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received,” Clinton said, dismissing claims to the contrary by federal intelligence officials as a bureaucratic dispute over what qualifies as classified.

The view from inside Clinton’s presidential campaign team was much the same: Clinton had done what she needed to do, there was nothing of real concern regarding the e-mails and, mostly, the whole matter was an annoyance in her efforts to win the White House.

The next week, however, law enforcement officials became interested, and the campaign’s apparent lack of concern began to turn into a sense of anxiety.

“They’re worried about it,” said a longtime Clinton adviser and confidant who agreed to discuss the mood of the campaign team only on the condition of anonymity. “They don’t know where it goes. That’s the problem.” (Read more from this story HERE)

______________________________________________________

F.B.I. Tracking Path of Classified Email From State Dept. To Hillary Clinton

By Michael S. Schdmidt and David E. Sanger. F.B.I. agents investigating Hillary Rodham Clinton’s private email server are seeking to determine who at the State Department passed highly classified information from secure networks to Mrs. Clinton’s personal account, according to law enforcement and diplomatic officials and others briefed on the investigation.

To track how the information flowed, agents will try to gain access to the email accounts of many State Department officials who worked there while Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state, the officials said. State Department employees apparently circulated the emails on unclassified systems in 2009 and 2011, and some were ultimately forwarded to Mrs. Clinton.

They were not marked as classified, the State Department has said, and it is unclear whether its employees knew the origin of the information.

The F.B.I. is also trying to determine whether foreign powers, especially China or Russia, gained access to Mrs. Clinton’s private server, although at this point, any security breaches are speculation.

Law enforcement officials have said that Mrs. Clinton, who is seeking the 2016 Democratic nomination for president, is not a target of the investigation, and she has said there is no evidence that her account was hacked. There has also been no evidence that she broke the law, and many specialists believe the occasional appearance of classified information in her account was probably of marginal consequence. (Read more from this story HERE)

______________________________________________________

Hillary Clinton Jokes About Snapchat’s Disappearing Messages at Iowa Speech

By Ken Thomas. Hillary Rodham Clinton fiercely defended her use of a private email server as President Barack Obama’s secretary of state in a speech before influential Iowa Democrats on Friday, but made light of the simmering controversy as well.

The appearance at the annual Wing Ding, a Democratic fundraiser in northern Iowa that attracted three other presidential candidates, came days after she agreed to turn over to the FBI the private server she used as secretary of state. Republicans assert she was negligent in handling the nation’s secrets.

Clinton offered a light take on the email probe when she talked about launching a Snapchat social media account. “I love it,” she said. “Those messages disappear all by themselves.”

More seriously, she said she would “do my part to provide transparency to Americans — that’s why I’m insisting 55,000 pages of my emails be published as soon as possible” and turned over the server, Clinton said “I won’t pretend that this is anything other than what it is: the same old partisan games we’ve seen so many times before,” she said.

“So I don’t care how many super PACs and Republicans pile on. I’ve been fighting for families and underdogs my entire life and I’m not going to stop now.” (Read more from this story HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio Loses Another Round in Court in Immigration Fight

sheriff-joe-arpaioBy Timothy M. Phelps. Arizona Sheriff Joseph Arpaio lost another round Friday in his long battle against the Obama administration over immigration.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled unanimously that Arpaio, whose Phoenix-area department has been aggressive in trying to deport immigrants in the country illegally, did not have standing to sue.

Arpaio had complained that the administration’s deferred-deportation program — allowing up to 5 million immigrants to stay in the country — would serve as a magnet for others to cross from Mexico into his jurisdiction in Maricopa County. He contended that those crossing the border illegally would stay in his area and commit crimes.

But in her opinion for a three-judge panel, Judge Nina Pillard, a controversial Obama appointee approved by the Senate only after a change of rules, said Arpaio’s contentions are “unduly speculative” . . .

“The court correctly recognized that the constitution does not permit federal courts to hear lawsuits that rest on baseless speculation,” said White House spokesman Eric Schultz. “We will continue to work toward resolving the legal challenges so that the administration can move forward with implementing all of the president’s commonsense immigration policies.” (Read more from “Sheriff Joe Arpaio Loses Another Round in Court in Immigration Fight” HERE)

______________________________________________________________

Sheriff Joe: We’re Going to the Supreme Court

By Ian Hanchett. Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff Joe Arpaio reacted to a federal appeals court throwing out his lawsuit against President Obama’s executive actions on immigration by vowing “we’re going to the Supreme Court” on Friday’s “Your World with Neil Cavuto” on the Fox News Channel.

Arpaio said, “we’re going to Supreme Court. We knew it was a tough battle in that appellate court down in Washington, DC, but we’re way ahead of the judge in south Texas, when all those governors joined, and I guess the judge put that on hold. So, we’re already in the appellate court, and now going to Supreme Court on this very important issue.” (Read more from this story HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Illegal Alien Drug Dealer Who Broke Toddler’s Arms and Legs FREED

CentralMigrantsMexicoBy Daniel Greenfield. Wait. Let’s politically correctize that. “Undocumented immigrant undocumented pharmacist set free in measure to protect civil rights.” This is life under the sanctuary state in a sanctuary nation.

A California toddler is fighting for her life Thursday after a brutal beating at the hands of an illegal immigrant with a long criminal record is the latest case to rile California sheriffs and police against a U.S. immigration policy they say is forcing them to release dangerous criminals out on the street.

Francisco Javier Chavez, the live-in boyfriend of the unidentified two-year-old’s mother, is out on bail after being charged in the late July attack, which left the San Luis Obispo County girl with two broken arms, a broken femur, a compressed spine, a urinary tract infection and a fever of 107 degrees. Chavez’s criminal record includes assault and drug convictions and arrests for violent acts including kidnapping, car jacking and cruelty to a child.

A disgusted San Luis Obispo Sheriff Ian Parkinson told FoxNews.com Chavez should have been locked away or deported long before he had the chance to inflict “horrific injuries” on the little girl, but said conflicting federal policies leave his department handcuffed. Instead, Chavez is now free, awaiting a court date for which he may not even show up.

Maybe Macy’s can give him a job. Chavez should have been deported long ago. But Obama lies when he claims that his illegal alien amnesty keeps families together while deporting criminals. (Read more from “Illegal Alien Drug Dealer Who Broke Toddler’s Arms and Legs FREED” HERE)

___________________________________________________________

American Kids Pay Heavy Price for Obama’s Border Failure

By Michael Cutler. In the “Wild West” America’s pioneers who were heading west would employ a simple but effective strategy when they came under attack. They circled their wagons to form what was hopefully an impenetrable perimeter.

Further back in history, castles were protected by high walls and often moats were created to offer a buffer beyond the walls, requiring draw bridges to enable those who wanted to traverse the moat to either enter or leave the castle compound.

It is more than ironic, as we about to see, that Obama himself drew that very same analogy about border security concerning a moat. For good measure, he even threw in alligators to fill that moat.

Of course he used that language derisively to insult and ridicule anyone who dared suggest our borders are not secure, but that those borders must be made secure.

Considering the threats that America and Americans face by international terrorist organizations and transnational criminal organizations, if ever their was a time that our borders should be secured, this is the time. Of course the Obama administration has very different plans. Virtually from its first days, the Obama administration has lied about the failures of the immigration system to secure our borders and carry out its missions that are intrinsic to national security and public safety. (Read more from this story HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Donald Trump Pledges to Support Republican Nominee, Walking Back on This Threat

trump (1)Back in favor at Fox News, Donald Trump dropped a bombshell in the middle of an interview with Sean Hannity on Tuesday night that should warm the hearts of Republicans everywhere: He will support the Republican nominee for president, even if it’s not him.

“Let’s assume you’re treated fairly in the process, you didn’t win the nomination — at that point, you would support the Republican candidate?” Hannity asked.

“That’s true,” Trump said.

It was a change in tune since one of the hottest moments from last week’s debate of GOP presidential hopefuls in Cleveland, when Fox’s moderators asked whether Trump would break from the GOP and run as a third-party candidate. Trump, smiling, refused to make any promises.

Whether he sticks to his new line remains to be seen, but in the meantime, Trump has thrown Fox — not to mention the Republican Party — a big bone. The news comes after reports that he and Fox chairman Roger Ailes patched things up in the post-debate fallout. After the mogul torched Fox News for days over an aggressive set of questions during the GOP debate, particularly his thrashing by co-host Megyn Kelly, Trump worked out his beef with Ailes over the phone. He addressed the conflict at the start of the Hannity interview. (Read more from “Donald Trump Pledges to Support Republican Nominee, Walking Back on This Threat” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Pistol-Whipped Alabama Cop Didn’t Shoot Attacker for Fear of Making Headlines

roebuck15n-3-webThe Alabama police officer who went viral after he was pistol-whipped with his own gun last week said he didn’t shoot his attacker because he didn’t want to make headlines as the nation’s newest vilified cop.

The Birmingham detective, whose name has not yet been released, paused while a suspect attacked him during a traffic stop because he feared the country-wide backlash he might receive for killing a black man, the head of the local police union said Friday.

“Local law enforcement officers are walking on egg shells because they’re so hesitant of how to interact because of what’s taking place in the media,” police Sgt. Heath Boackle, president of the Fraternal Order of Police, told the Daily News . . .

Images of the bloodied officer lying limp and face-down on the ground quickly went viral after witnesses dispersed them on social media, where the wounded deputy was heavily mocked by cop critics . . .

The plainclothes Birmingham cop was investigating a string of burglaries when he stopped a GMC Yukon and was attacked by the driver who immediately got out of his vehicle, authorities said. (Read more from “Pistol-Whipped Alabama Cop Didn’t Shoot Attacker for Fear of Making Headlines” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Ron Paul Endorses Son Rand as “Best Hope” to Lead Country

Should the son inherit the votes of the father? Ron Paul, the former congressman and presidential candidate who sparked a libertarian “revolution” during his last two bids for the White House, is endorsing his son, Sen. Rand Paul, for president.

In a letter that Paul campaign insiders say is “going out all over, early states, donors,” Paul senior writes things such as:

Rand is the ONLY one in the race who is standing up for your Liberty, across the board….he is our best hope to restore liberty, limited government and the Bill of Rights and finally end the big spending status quo in Washington, D.C….

Remember, truth is treason in the empire of lies. And nowhere is that more true than when it comes to Washington, D.C. and their media mouthpieces.

Even where Rand and I do have minor differences of opinion, I would take Rand’s position over any of his opponents’ in both parties every time….

And there’s this:

There is not one candidate who has run for president in my lifetime who can say they fully share my commitment to liberty, Austrian economics, small government, and following the Constitution, [more] than my son, Rand Paul.

That’s why I have wholeheartedly endorsed him.

I know the media likes to play this little game where they pit us, or certain views, against each other.

Don’t fall for it. They’re trying to manufacture storylines at liberty’s expense. You’ve spent years seeing how the media treated me. They aren’t my friends and they aren’t yours.

Full Story.

A Baker Refused to Make a Cake for a Gay Wedding, What a Court Just Ruled Could Have Huge Implications

shutterstock_139893601-913x512By Randy DeSoto. The Colorado Court of Appeals ruled Thursday that a Christian baker must bake cakes for same-sex weddings.

The court affirmed a Colorado Civil Rights Commission ruling that Jack Phillips, the owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood outside of Denver, violated the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA).

“CADA prohibits places of public accommodations from basing their refusal to serve customers on their sexual orientation, and Masterpiece violated Colorado’s public accommodations law by refusing to create a wedding cake for Craig’s and Mullins’ same-sex wedding celebration,” the court wrote.

Phillips, a devout Christian, did not refuse to serve Charlie Craig and David Mullins when they came in his bakery in July 2012, but informed the men that, because of his beliefs, he would have to decline their wedding cake business. Gay marriage was not legalized in the state until October 2014. He told them he was more than happy to sell them other baked goods.

“Phillips believes that decorating cakes is a form of art, that he can honor God through his artistic talents, and that he would displease God by creating cakes for same-sex marriages,” the court opinion recognized. However, the three-judge panel rejected his religious liberty argument, finding that his refusal to bake a same-sex wedding cake constituted discrimination against the couple based on their sexual orientation. The same-sex couple’s right to not be discriminated against overrides Phillips’ right to the free exercise of religion, according to the court.

“We conclude that the act of same-sex marriage is closely correlated to Craig’s and Mullins’ sexual orientation, and therefore, the [administrative law judge] did not err when he found that Masterpiece’s refusal to create a wedding cake for Craig and Mullins was ‘because of’ their sexual orientation, in violation of CADA,” wrote Judge Taubman. (Read more from “A Baker Refused to Make a Cake for a Gay Wedding, What a Court Just Ruled Could Have Huge Implications” HERE)

________________________________________________________

Court Rules Against Colorado Cake Shop in Same-Sex Marriage Case

By Jason Hanna. An appellate court on Thursday ruled against a Colorado bakery owner who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple, rejecting among other things his denial that he discriminated against them because they are gay.

The Colorado Court of Appeals decision affirms a commission’s earlier decision that Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood and its owner, Jack Phillips, violated the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act when he declined to make a cake for Charlie Craig and David Mullins’ wedding reception in 2012.

Phillips, a Christian, argued that his refusal to make the cake was based on his religious opposition to the act of same-sex marriage — a position he asserted was constitutionally protected — not based on an opposition to their sexual orientation.

Colorado law prohibits places of public accommodation from refusing to serve people based on sexual orientation. (Read more from this story HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.