Will the Left Radicalize the Military?

Listen up, Evangelical Christians, Mormons, Catholics, and Orthodox Jews. You read the news. An unnamed instructor with a U.S. Army Reserve unit put together a slide show in which he lumped you together with the KKK, Al Qaeda, and Hamas. Keep your heads up; that buzzing sound overhead might be a drone coming for you.

Down the road, the military’s growing conformity to the American left’s worldview and values may have dire ramifications for the military, national security, and the nation. The further “leftization” of the nation’s armed forces will only exacerbate the deep divisions in American society, between left and right, citizens of faith and the godless, the politically correct, and those Americans who aren’t willing to bend to the PC’s shibboleths. Will the military eventually morph into an enemy of traditional America?

The Army instructor’s exhortation (or should it be termed “indoctrination?”) is being fobbed off as poor judgment on his part, and in no way reflects military policy. Big deal.

The instructor’s slide show is telling because it reveals the left’s continued infiltration of the military for the purpose of radicalizing it, just as the left has and is doing with public schools, higher education, the mainstream news media, the culture, and the arts. Some Pentagon pencil-neck with a star or two on his collars doesn’t have to write a policy in step with President Obama’s and the left’s antipathy to Christianity and Judaism (given the president’s demonstrated ill-will toward Israel) to advance a de facto hostility toward traditional Western faiths (we’re including Judaism).

Ladies and gentlemen, the Army instructor didn’t just follow a wild hare in classifying tens of millions of Christians and Jews as extremists. That thinking is seeping down the chain of command. It’s a fair wager that the instructor presented the now controversial slide because he was confident that it fittingly represented the shifting worldview among the army brass.

Read more from this story HERE.

Is There Credible Proof for Darwinian Evolution?

Photo Credit: AP

Many who believe in the Darwinian Evolutionary theory take it to be a proven fact. Not only that, but they also view those with another perspective (i.e.: not believing in Darwinian Evolution) with contempt and disdain.

“It is absolutely safe to say that if you meet someone who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid or insane.” (Dr. Richard Dawkins, 1999, NY Times article: “Put Your Money on Evolution”)

So, what kind of theories and/or evidence do evolutionists postulate that are so logical and intelligent that anyone who does not believe it (as Dr. Dawkins stated) is ignorant, stupid or insane? Consider the following example of what is being taught by sympathizers of the Darwinian Evolutionary theory:

“The observable universe could have evolved from an infinitesimal region (i.e.: smaller than the period at the end of this sentence). It is then tempting to go one step further and speculate that the entire universe evolved from literally nothing.” (Dr. Alan Guth, Scientific American, May 1984, pg. 128)

Unfortunately, many persons put their faith in a theory that is largely based on interpreted facts; not actual facts. Those who attempt to shed light on the fallacies of the Darwinian Evolution theory are ridiculed, scorned, vilified, attacked, or excluded from so-called intellectual circles of academia.

Read more from this story HERE.

Addicted Nation: The Price Tag to our Society and a Way Out for Those Suffering

Photo Credit: IrishCentral

America launched a war on illegal drugs in 1979, spending an estimated 1 trillion on law enforcement efforts since then…..How’s that working out so far? See CNN’s War on drugs, a trillion dollar failure

Mexican drug cartels are profiting hugely from our war and have now grown so powerful they are moving into the United States.

Americas insatiable desire to get high, has kept our prisons full. Many of those incarcerated, abused drugs or alcohol; which may have accounted for the criminal behavior that landed them in prison…Perhaps they were involved in the sale and marketing of drugs, or were themselves the end users.

The cost of addiction to our society can’t even be measured in dollars alone. What bad decisions do addictions cause when judgment is impaired? How many families are shattered? Careers and reputations ruined? Accidental deaths and overdose?

In a world view, President Clinton commented on an incident in his book. He said he was briefed by the Secret Service after they found Russian President Boris Yeltsin standing outside the White House guest quarters, totally inebriated. Dressed only in his underwear, he was trying to hail a taxi in order to get a pizza…this was a world leader with his finger on the button of nuclear weapons. Yeltsin was well known for his chronic drinking problems.

Libertarians like Fox News correspondent John Stossel, have been calling to legalize current “illegal drugs,” saying it’s no business of the government to tell adults what they can, or cannot ingest.

Many experts in the field of addiction say it’s time to take the focus away from criminalization and the stigma that goes with it and focus instead on education/treatment.

There are many great organizations ready to help those suffering from addictions.

Alcoholics Anonymous has successfully helped millions of alcoholics to become productive members of society. Many other organizations adopted AA’s basic premise of 12 step groups and have successfully helped millions of others in their struggle with addictions to drugs, gambling and other harmful behaviors. AA and organizations such as Narcotics Anonymous, are available to help those suffering and are free of charge. See addiction recovery groups

Addiction treatment facilities have developed their own unique and successful ways of helping people break their addictions. Some are free or relatively inexpensive such as what the faith based Salavation Army offers. There are also many state supported facilities which offer drug and alcohol treatment for a nominal fee or free of charge. See recovery resources

There are private rehabilitation facilities offering state of the art treatment using their unique brand of intensive psychotherapy and holistic treatments, such as those developed by Richard Taite at Cliffside Malibu. Richard outlined his roadmap for an addiction free life in his book: Ending Addiction for Good

Louise McCallion’s facility in Northern California, Reflections, has devoted itself to providing treatment for not only the addictions to drugs/alcohol…But also has expertise in dual-diagnosis and co-occurring disorders, all under the care of her well qualified and professional staff.

But private treatment facilities can be expensive; from several thousand dollars for a 30 day stay, to tens of thousands and more for high end facilities.

Other unique forms of help are available such as what Declinol offers in natural cures for alcohol cravings. It is an eight-week at home alcohol program that is completely anonymous. There are no group meetings and clients can go about their regular daily routine. Declinol claims its unique blend of herbs assists the body by restoring the balance and helps to reduce alcohol cravings. While on their program, they offer phone support to answer questions and an online forum where you can communicate with current and past clients of the program.

Declinol isn’t a long term treatment program and doesn’t purport to be, but like many of the other programs, it can be a tool to take that first step towards a long term sober lifestyle…. for a fraction of the price that rehab facilities charge.

Millions of people suffer from their addictions, they should know there is a helping hand ready to lift them up. All they have to do is ask for help.

___________________________________________

Ed Farnan is the conservative columnist at IrishCentral, where he has been writing on the need for energy independence, strong self defense, secure borders, 2nd amendment, smaller government and many other issues. His articles appear in many publications throughout the USA and world. He has been a guest on Fox News and a regular guest on radio stations in the US and Europe.

Answer to Gun Violence is Gun Control? Not Hardly.

Photo Credit: Fox News

Dylan Quick, the 20-year-old accused of going on a stabbing rampage yesterday—injuring 14 people at Lone Star Community College in Texas—should settle the gun control/violence debate, once and for all.

That won’t happen, of course, because people who want to restrict personal freedoms will still turn a blind eye to the obvious: After years of America destroying its mental health care system, leaving it in ruins, as a national disgrace, cases of undiagnosed and untreated mental illness are to blame for the horrific episodes of violence that have made headlines and wrongly fueled gun control legislation.

This is true for Jared Lee Loughner, who shot Congressman Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson, Arizona. It is true for James Holmes, the man accused of murdering 12 people in a Colorado movie theatre. It is true for Adam Lanza, the man who murdered 20 children and 6 adults at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut.

Dylan Quick reportedly fantasized about killing people by stabbing them since he was a child. He reportedly walked around wearing gloves, even in warm weather, clutching stuffed animals.

I believe it will turn out that Mr. Quick, like the rest of the recent perpetrators of mass violence, fell through the colossal cracks in our decrepit system. A system of antiquated psychiatric facilities, understaffed community mental health centers and insurance companies hell-bent on restricting mental health care resources in a disproportionate fashion, compared to those targeted at other illnesses, and one which is a shameful show of prejudice towards the afflicted.

Read more from this story HERE.

To Prevent Mass Murders, Lock up Crazy People

Photo Credit: Daily Caller

Obama has been draping himself in families of the children murdered in Newtown.

MSNBC’s Martin Bashir suggested that Republican senators need to have a member of their families killed for them to support the Democrats’ gun proposals.

In a bizarre version of “A Christmas Carol,” CNN’s Carol Costello fantasized about “a mother who lost her child,” showing up and knocking on Sen. Rand Paul’s door, saying, “Please don’t do this!”

The victims of gun violence are the left’s latest “human shields” — a term coined by me in Godless: The Church of Liberalism — for their idiotic ideas. At least it’s not the godawful Jersey Girls this time.

The one clear thread that unites all the mass murders currently being exploited by the Democrats is that they were committed by visibly crazy people who were unaccountably not institutionalized. But Democrats refuse to do anything about crazy people. Apparently, the views of families with relatives murdered by severely disturbed individuals are no longer relevant when it comes to institutionalizing the mentally ill.

Read more from this story HERE.

Obama's Proposed Cuts: Not Even Close to REAL Entitlement Reform

In his latest attempt to cajole Republicans into raising taxes, Obama has called for a budget plan that makes some cuts to Medicare providers and subjects Social Security payments to the chained CPI. John Boehner was correct to reject this ploy of holding entitlement savings hostage for tax increases. However, he has come close to negotiating such a deal in the past, and there are some GOP officials who are saying they would still agree to such a trade. Lindsey Graham has already expressed encouragement over the proposal.

We must remember that even to the extent we would be willing to trade tax increases for something transformational, Obama’s proposal is not entitlement reform, and it certainly doesn’t represent something transformational. It is a proposal of austerity cuts to the status quo.

The problem with entitlements is not limited to the budgetary cost to the federal government, although that is certainly a major concern. The problem with our entitlements – in the case of Medicare and Medicaid – is the lack of choices, free market forces, and the inflationary cost of healthcare to the individual. The problem with Social Security is the lack of private property rights, dreadful rate of return, lack of individual liberty, and hopeless dependency on government. Limiting benefits to the chained CPI might be fine for the government option, but it should not replace policies that offer more choices. Means-testing benefits might save money, but we must not forget that Social Security is already means-tested, as its benefit formula is tendentious towards low-income earners relative to what they contribute to the program.

Read more from this story HERE.

Deja Roo: Establishment Republicans Contravene Rules, Subvert GOP Elections . . . Again!

Photo Credit: DonkeyHotey

As though the Establishment’s political lynching of Chair-Elect Russ Millette wasn’t enough, the verdict is now in on round two of the proceedings from the Kangaroo Court assembled by the State Executive Committee. After hearing the latest verdict, it is abundantly clear that party “leadership” is sending an unequivocal message to grassroots conservatives: your vote doesn’t matter.

It might be dismissed as an anomaly, an exigent circumstance, or perhaps an isolated lapse in judgment if we hadn’t seen this flick before. But the bad reruns just keep coming, ad nauseam.

After the State Convention in April, I sat down for lunch with ARP Rules Chair Frank McQueary to talk party politics and see if we could patch things up. When asked what could be done to bring the party together, his answer was “nothing.” Period.

Mr. McQueary then went on to give me a history of grievances stretching back to my childhood. He told of the villainous Christian fundamentalists from the “Moral Majority” of the 1980’s, the troublesome “Christian Coalition” of the 1990’s, and so on. It all left me scratching my head, wondering what all that had to do with me or my conservative friends in 2012.

Apparently they had committed the same almighty calumny that the Palinistas, Millerites, and Paulers had. They had the unmitigated gall to go out, organize, and win an election. Clearly unacceptable!

Notwithstanding the protests of my Establishment friends, this whole sordid affair had nothing to do with Russ Millette or Debbie Brown. Just like the last episode had nothing to do with Joe Miller. Or the one before with Sarah Palin . . . or the Christian Coalition of the 90’s . . . or the Moral Majority of the 80’s . . .

It had everything to do with ruling class entitlement, corruption, and a group of despotic power mongers who leverage political power for personal aggrandizement, and shake down State and Federal Treasuries for the enrichment of their friends and family. Can we say crony capitalist?

They are the folks who for a generation propped up Ted Stevens, the Murkowskis, and Don Young while they colluded with lawyers, lobbyists, corporatists, and other corrupt politicians in Washington to create a network that would bring the gravy train to Alaska and keep it flowing. Our delegation and their “partners in crime” are known inside the beltway as “the Alaska Mafia.” No joke.

Sadly, the ARP’s role in enabling big government and crony capitalism has made it a willing accomplice in the bankrupting of America. The struggle you see going on now is for the heart and soul of the Republican Party in the Last Frontier. Nothing more. Nothing less.

The Establishment is arguing again that the results of the Convention were somehow illegitimate, and don’t represent the Alaska Republican Party. Where have we heard that before?

Seems I recall hearing a lot of moaning from the Establishment that Sarah Palin wasn’t “one of us.” Ironically, she was too bipartisan.

And given my central role in Joe Miller’s campaign, I know the narrative well that was being peddled in the days following Joe’s stunning primary victory in the 2010 US Senate race.

Yep. Same story. The primary election didn’t reflect Alaska because it represented only a fraction of the electorate (it’s called the party system), everybody who wanted to vote for Lisa couldn’t (read Democrats) because of the closed Republican primary, and of course Joe Miller had somehow won illegitimately because he “mischaracterized” Murkowski’s record.

I know I’m a little late with the Truth Squad, but the fact is that Joe Miller defeated Lisa Murkowski in the largest turnout for a Republican Primary in the history of Alaska, garnering more than 10,000 more votes than Murkowski received in her 2004 primary victory which she won by more than 20 points.

Then-Representative Lisa Murkowski had voted for the closed primary system while serving in the Alaska Legislature. And the Senator went on to embrace almost every one of Joe’s supposed “mischaracterizations” of her record in the general election, vindicating his statements as truth. Ironically, she won her write-in bid with the help of more than 36,000 Democrats. That would be more votes than the write-in senator received from Republicans.

Murkowski also claimed that she re-entered the race due to an outpouring of public support that grew over time to create a popular mandate. But according to an interview conducted with The Daily Beast on primary election night, knowing things were not looking good for her, she was already entertaining the idea of a third-party run before the primary results were even tallied.

Joe Miller was subsequently villified and treated as a pariah by Establishment Republicans who supported Murkowski’s relentless multi-million-dollar fear-and-smear campaign, proving that all it takes to destroy the character of a good man is a few million dollars and a lot of malice.

The same canards were trotted out after Russ Millette won the chairmanship with 54% of the vote from elected delegates representing all forty political districts of the state. Was it a small number of the 137,000 Republicans in the State of Alaska? Yes, it’s called representative government. But it was a decisive victory from what was reportedly the largest Republican Convention ever assembled in the Alaska.

Not only are the architects of “Republican” mayhem living a lie through their post-convention coup, they are engaging in hypocrisy of the lowest kind. For over the molehill of specious charges leveled at both the Chair and Vice-Chair duly elected by the delegates of the 2012 Republican State Convention, looms a mountain of evidence to prove beyond doubt that many of the folks on the SEC have in fact broken party rules for which there has been no discipline imposed.

I offer two indisputable examples that are a matter of public record: United States Senator Lisa Murkowski, and long-time party boss Randy Ruedrich.

As we all witnessed in 2010, Lisa Murkowski, a sitting member of the State Central Committee, waged a multi-million-dollar smear campaign on the public airwaves against the party nominee. It was mean-spirited. It was malicious. And it was a clear violation of party rules.

What was the Party’s official response? To congratulate the perpetrator, and openly attack the Republican nominee. And that is where Ruedrich comes in.

As though it wasn’t enough to publicly embrace the villainous Murkowski, and seek to publicly humiliate the Republican nominee, Ruedrich joined the Murkowski intervention in post-election legal proceedings by signing a sworn affidavit submitted to the Court, all before the election was certified. This too was clearly a violation of party rules for which the State Central Committee could have removed Ruedrich from office.

So what did the Central Committee do about these clear rules violations? Absolutely nothing.

In fact, after the duly elected delegates of the 2012 State Convention passed a resolution out of committee censuring Murkowski for her destructive behavior, Ruedrich broke the rules again to shut down the convention prematurely, averting a floor vote on the censure. The Chairman subsequently thwarted the reconvene of the convention required under the rules, even taking to the press to tell folks not to attend so as to avoid a quorum.

But it didn’t end there. When the State Central Committee finally got around to acting on the censure resolution, they refused to even vote, instead opting to table it. So not only were they unwilling to exercise discipline by removing the bad actors, they were not even willing to denounce what they had done.

But then again, why would this behavior be surprising coming from the likes of folks who I personally witnessed throw tantrums at the State Convention. One vowed to “burn down the Central Committee.” Another personally told me he couldn’t wait until his term was up as a state-wide officer so he could attack the party openly. Both of these members voted to remove the duly elected leaders of our party.

The subversive behavior of ARP “Leadership” deserves censure from every Alaskan of good will. It is dishonest. It is hypocritical. It is an affront to good faith and fair dealing.

Sorry folks, the verdict of the State Executive Committee’s Kangaroo Court just won’t pass the red face test. And while the corrupt Republican Establishment continues to wage war on the citizens they expect to vote for them, Mark Begich laughs. Let’s hope he’s not laughing all the way back to Washington for a second term.

Obama Screwing Up in North Korea

photo credit: petersnoopy

After the Obama Administration publicly blamed the U.S. Military for “amping up” North Korea’s boy-leader last week, it is continuing its deferential posture toward the reclusive country.

Today, the Pentagon announced that it is canceling a previously planned Minuteman III ballistic missile test to avoid upsetting ‘Supreme Leader’ Kim Jong Un.

Despite the arrival of B-2’s and other significant U.S. assets over the last week, sources are continuing to report that North Korea is not only prepping for another missile launch but may also be preparing for another nuclear detonation.

Additionally, the Chinese have now reported live-fire maneuvers near the border.

If Obama wishes to put an end to North Korea’s games, he’s certainly going about it the wrong way. Publicly blaming your own military and interrupting long-planned tests upon which our national security depends plays directly into the little dictator’s hands.

Kim Jong Un now has bragging rights that he forced the world’s superpower to blink, something that has likely earned his hard-line military’s respect. Obama has almost certainly guaranteed that we’ll see the same type of scenario play out, yet again, in the not-so-distant future.

Will Benghazi Come Back to Bite Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama? 700 Retired Special Forces Warriors Demand Answers

Photo Credit: Irish Central

It seems no matter how hard the Obama administration tries to keep the lid on the simmering pot of Benghazi, someone comes along and turns up the heat.

This time it’s an open letter signed by 700 of some of Americas top retired special operations military personnel. The letter demands answers to many of the unanswered questions regarding the Benghazi terrorist attack that killed four Americans and wounded several.

Of key concern to the Special Ops personnel, is the code that says the US will support its forces and do everything humanly possible to send help if they are under attack. Answers provided so far by the Obama administration, seem to contradict that code and point in the direction that our personnel were abandoned by orders given high up in the chain of command.

Military personnel point out that if our fighting forces feel they will not be backed up if they are in dangerous situations, it will send a chill throughout the entire military.

Of course we still do not know who made the decision to deny our Libyan ambassador the additional security he desperately requested in the days leading up to the attack, even though he warned Hillary Clintons state department his situation was dangerous.

Here is the letter in its entirety.

Some of the key questions include:

Why was there no military response to the events in Benghazi?

Was military assistance requested by the Department of State? If so, what type?

How many US personnel were injured in Benghazi?

Why have the survivors of the attack not been questioned?

Where are the survivors?

Were any strike aircraft (such as an AC-130 gunship) in the area or possibly overhead that would cause former SEAL Tyrone Woods to laser-designate his attacker’s position and call for gunship fire support, thereby revealing his own location that led to his death?

Who gave the order to “STAND DOWN” that was heard repeatedly during the attacks?

Why are so many agencies now requiring their personnel that were involved in or have access to information regarding the events that took place in Benghazi sign Non-Disclosure Agreements?

Even though the main stream media and the Obama administration seem to want to forget about this, a large segment of the American population doesn’t… and they are demanding answers.

___________________________________________

Ed Farnan is the conservative columnist at IrishCentral, where he has been writing on the need for energy independence, strong self defense, secure borders, 2nd amendment, smaller government and many other issues. His articles appear in many publications throughout the USA and world. He has been a guest on Fox News and a regular guest on radio stations in the US and Europe.

An Open Letter to the Sanctimonious Bill O'Reilly (+video)

Photo Credit: Donkey Hotey

Dear Bill O’Reilly,

You’re a pinhead! Just watched your segment with Laura Ingraham on “Bible thumping.” While you are correct that arguments from religious authority will not work, using pejorative epithets like “Bible thumper” is inherently offensive no matter how accurate you think it might be. It is an attempt to marginalize, ridicule and belittle fundamentalist and evangelical Christians. It’s a whole lot like calling homosexuals the queer F-word.

What you are implying is that Christians are beating people up with the Bible, and that the Bible has no place in public life. You appear to also be suggesting that Biblical wisdom stands in stark contrast to rational discourse. None of that is true. In fact, it could hardly be further from the truth. Every significant idea at the core of Western thought has its genesis in the Christian synthesis of Hebrew religion and Greek philosophy.

While I believe that conservatives have done a poor job arguing the “gay marriage” issue, the whole concept of government-sanctioned same-sex marriage is fundamentally irreconcilable with the intent of the government’s involvement with marriage in the first place.

Government-sanctioned marriage is NOT a Right, it is the government’s implementation of the “general welfare” clause in which it seeks to encourage behavior that is salubrious, and discourage that which is deleterious.

Traditional marriage is privileged because in the long history of human experience, it has been linked to human flourishing and the well-being of society. It has always been the foundation of Western Civilization, and provides certain benefits to society that same-sex marriage simply cannot. These are not religious statements. They are historical and empirically verifiable.

This whole debate has absolutely NOTHING to do with freedom or equality under the law. Gays can already get married in America, they just can’t access certain government benefits (such as tax breaks) offered to traditional families. Nor should the government offer such benefits, because those relationships do not offer back the same benefits to society.

If the government does indeed sanction same-same marriage on account of specious arguments put forward under the banner of human “Rights” and “equal protection,” not only will the good of the order not be served, but under this false flag an inherent contradiction will be established between the “free exercise” of the First Amendment and the “equal protection” guaranteed by the Fourteenth.

I enjoy watching your show, but you could not be more wrong on this issue. Nor could your choice of words be more ill-informed.

Watch video here: