Another ‘Prominent’ Never Trumper Accused of Soliciting Sex From Underage Boy

What is it with Never Trumpers and underage boys? Because here we go again…

“The Alachua County [Florida] Sheriff’s Office (ACSO) continues to investigate the case of Archer resident and Newberry education activist Joel Searby after a judge denied him bond in a pretrial hearing on Tuesday,” reported local news.

“Searby was arrested [June 20] for [alleged] lewd and lascivious behavior, obscene communication to lure a minor, and obscene communication to travel to meet and lure a minor,” the report continues, adding: “The arrest report recounts Snapchat conversations between Searby and a 15-year-old boy in which Searby solicited the victim for photos and sexual acts.”

The breakdown of Searby’s alleged messages to lure and abuse this kid are beyond the beyond. Police say Searby, who intends to plead not guilty, knew the boy was only 15. . .

Remember back in 2016 when a bunch of fake Republicans tried to get Hillary Clinton elected by running former CIA operative Evan McMullin as an independent presidential candidate? Not to get too far off-topic here, but let me tell you something: There is nothing more neocon than running a CIA operative for president. (Read more from “Another ‘Prominent’ Never Trumper Accused of Soliciting Sex From Underage Boy” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

The Reason Why This Mother Was Removed From a Flight Will Shock You

A Texas woman claimed that she was booted off a flight on Wednesday for “misgendering” a flight attendant.

The mother, Jenna Longoria, was traveling on United Airlines with her 16-month-old child. In a video shared online, Longoria claimed that she was not allowed to board the plane because she made a comment where she “misgendered” an airline employed.

“The flight attendant has denied access to us because he said I made a derogatory comment about one of the flight attendants because I didn’t use the right pronoun,” she stated in the video.

“The flight attendant has denied access to us because he said I made a derogatory comment about one of the flight attendants because I didn’t use the right pronoun,” she stated in the video. “Now they are forbidding us to get on the plane.”

(Read more from “The Reason Why This Mother Was Removed From a Flight Will Shock You” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

Congressional Report Exposes CIA’s Collusion with Biden Campaign to Discredit Hunter Biden Laptop Story

In a bombshell revelation, a congressional report released Tuesday exposes the CIA’s interference in the 2020 election by colluding with the Biden campaign to discredit the Hunter Biden laptop story.

The House Judiciary report highlights three critical points regarding the CIA’s involvement in the 2020 election. First, it reveals that high-ranking CIA officials, including then-CIA Director Gina Haspel, were aware of the statement discrediting the Hunter Biden laptop story before its publication. This awareness provided senior leadership with an opportunity to intervene and ensure the statement was properly vetted, yet they failed to do so.

Second, the report notes that some signatories of the statement, including former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell and former CIA Inspector General David Buckley, were on active contracts with the CIA at the time. Despite these officials’ claims that they did not access classified information when asserting the laptop story had “all the hallmarks” of Russian disinformation, their active roles within the CIA cast doubt on their impartiality.

Lastly, the report uncovers internal dissent within the CIA. Some employees expressed concern about the politicized nature of the statement, acknowledging it was not “helpful to the Agency in the long run.” At least one employee questioned the submission and approval process, highlighting the internal discontent with the agency’s involvement in the political narrative.

In 2020, 51 former intelligence officials signed a letter labeling the Hunter Biden laptop story as Russian disinformation. This letter, coordinated by current Secretary of State Antony Blinken, was instrumental in shaping public opinion ahead of the election. CNN reporter Natasha Bertrand amplified this narrative through a Politico story, which has since been discredited.

The congressional report underscores the inappropriate involvement of CIA contractors in the political process. As Morell himself acknowledged during the investigation, “It’s inappropriate for a currently serving staff officer or contractor to be involved in the political process.” This admission reflects the serious ethical breach that occurred.

The report also highlights the role of former Senior Intelligence Service Officer Marc Polymeropoulos, who co-authored the statement. Internal communications reveal that Polymeropoulos’s talking points contained classified information, which had to be removed before publication.

One CIA official noted, “It appears [Polymeropoulos] is actively involved in a pro-Biden campaign and may be disclosing classified information in his efforts.”

WATCH: CNN Host Gets Schooled on What Voters Really Think of Trump

The political “pundits” just don’t get it when it comes to what American voters really think about former Donald Trump.

That according to pollster Frank Luntz, who told CNN host Kate Bolduan on Tuesday that many of the so-called experts have been mistaken about the Republican.

As an example, Luntz discussed the 2016 presidential debate between Trump and Hillary Clinton, as Trump suggested the Democratic nominee would “be in jail” if he were president.

Bolduan played a clip of the debate, and Luntz indicated that while “pundits really condemned him,” voters actually were thrilled by the remark. . .

“And the pundits really condemned him [for] doing it. And our voters said, ‘Wait a minute. He’s holding her accountable. It’s about time that politicians are held accountable.’ That’s one of the great frustrations in America. That’s why we’re so angry because when you think politicians will say and do anything, and then actually do exactly the opposite of what they promise.” (Read more from “WATCH: CNN Host Gets Schooled on What Voters Really Think of Trump” HERE)

Yikes! Look Who Tells Joe Biden How to Debate President Trump

Hillary Clinton was the loser in the 2016 presidential election to President Donald Trump. In fact, she became a two-time loser in that race, having lost out on the Democratic nomination years earlier to Barack Obama, and repeatedly has claimed the 2016 election was stolen from her.

But her experiences are giving her the confidence to tell Joe Biden how to debate 2024 opponent President Donald Trump in a CNN event that is scheduled Thursday. . .

Explained The Patriotic News, in a headline: “Woman who will always be remembered for losing to Donald Trump has advice for Joe Biden.”

The report noted that as it’s an election year, “it is naturally time for Hillary Clinton to brush off the cobwebs and say a bunch of words about taking on Donald Trump and saving the country from a man she lost to in 2016.”

The report explained, “The former First Lady and Secretary of State is largely responsible for us becoming a country whose history books can say ‘President Donald Trump’ in future editions. But, that doesn’t mean she doesn’t have advice for Joe Biden, who is taking on Trump for the second time this year. She is releasing a book soon, and she is also writing op-eds in the New York Times, giving advice to Joe Biden.” (Read more from “Yikes! Look Who Tells Joe Biden How to Debate President Trump” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Is Axios Serious With This Story About Trump?

There is no pandemic from which to take cover this election season. Only Joe Biden and his remarkable short list of accomplishments have brought economic torpor at home and total chaos abroad. Biden decided to leave Afghanistan, only to become ensnared by another ‘endless war’ after the gaze of a Ukrainian dictator took him in. Now, Biden is speaking out of both sides of his mouth on Israel, claiming ironclad US support for their war in Gaza but also cutting off arms shipments to appease the antisemitic segments of the Democratic Party base. So, what can the liberal media do to prop up this senile old man? Warn voters that—get this—inflation will spike if Trump is elected president again (via Axios):

Sixteen Nobel prize-winning economists are jumping into the presidential campaign with a stark warning: Former President Trump’s plans would reignite inflation and cause lasting harm to the global economy if he wins in November.

Why it matters: The Nobel laureates are lending their academic prestige to a political argument the Biden administration has been making for weeks: Inflation would be worse under Trump.

“While each of us has different views on the particulars of various economic policies, we all agree that Joe Biden’s economic agenda is vastly superior to Donald Trump,” the 16 economists write in a letter, first obtained by Axios.

I’m rolling at this piece since most of it confirms that inflation right now is too high, which in turn kills American working families. The inflation spike has already arrived, thanks to Biden’s domestic agenda. Even if we accept the Chinese math on the job figures, which are always revised down, it doesn’t matter if everyone’s wallet is getting torched. We’re a part-time economy since that’s where most of Joe Biden’s job creation comes from—foreign workers are very much replacing American citizens in the workforce. (Read more from “Is Axios Serious With This Story About Trump?” HERE)

New Autopsy Study: COVID Vax Likely Killed Millions

As COVID-19 vaccines rolled out globally, concerns over their safety have been front and center. While initial trials – funded and conducted by vaccine manufacturers themselves – provided reassurance, reports of serious adverse events have sparked intense debate. A new study released two days ago delves into autopsy findings to explore whether these vaccines might have fatal consequences.

In a meticulous review of published autopsy reports, researchers unearthed troubling data. They analyzed hundreds of cases where individuals died shortly after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Shockingly, in 73.9% of these cases, the vaccine was either directly responsible for death or significantly contributed to it.

The most affected organ systems were the heart, blood, lungs, brain, and gut. Cardiovascular issues like heart inflammation (myocarditis), heart attacks, and clot-related complications were prevalent. Neurological problems and severe respiratory conditions also emerged, painting a complex picture of vaccine-related fatalities.

Scientists suspect the spike protein, a key component of COVID-19 vaccines, might trigger these adverse reactions. Its ability to induce inflammation throughout the body could explain why multiple organ systems are affected post-vaccination.

Most deaths occurred within a week of vaccination, raising alarms about the vaccine’s immediate impact on vulnerable individuals. This rapid onset suggests a need for heightened vigilance during the early post-vaccination period.

While autopsy studies have limitations, such as inherent biases in case selection and reporting, independent medical reviews validated these concerning findings. The study underscores the urgent need for more thorough investigations into vaccine-related deaths to better understand risk factors and prevent future fatalities.

In conclusion, this terrifying study highlights significant concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccine safety. It calls for continued vigilance through autopsy examinations of vaccine recipients who pass away unexpectedly. Moreover, extended monitoring post-vaccination could aid in detecting and managing serious adverse events early on. But most importantly, think for yourself, never trust big pharma, and never trust the feds (especially Fauci).

Joe Biden Was Definitely Going to Attack Trump on This in the Debate. He Can’t Now.

I would have never thought Snopes would be the one to drop an atomic bomb on liberal America like this—but here we are. One of the popular liberal myths about Donald Trump is the ‘both sides’ event after Charlottesville, where the media and Democrats for years have alleged Donald Trump was referring to the neo-Nazis that assembled during that Unite the Right rally, which left dozens injured and a woman dead after one white supremacist drove his car through a crowd of counter-protesters.

It’s the event that reportedly spurred Joe Biden to run for president. There is no doubt that Biden’s debate team was prepping him to sneak this attack line in the upcoming debates, and now they can’t. We’ll see who is truly prepared because Snopes shredded this liberal talking point, rating it “false.” We’ve known for years it was, as have you, but it’s now official: the ‘very fine people on both sides’ myth about Trump is dead (via Fox News):

The left-leaning fact-checking website Snopes acknowledged Saturday that former President Trump never called neo-Nazis “very fine people” during his press conference following the Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally in 2017.

[…]

“While Trump did say that there were ‘very fine people on both sides,’ he also specifically noted that he was not talking about neo-Nazis and White supremacists and said they should be ‘condemned totally.’ Therefore, we have rated this claim ‘False,'” Snopes wrote.

(Read more from “Joe Biden Was Definitely Going to Attack Trump on This in the Debate. He Can’t Now.” HERE)

‘Surreal to Watch’: With Trump Ahead, Stolen Election Seen ‘In Crystal Clarity’

With the 2024 presidential contest fast approaching, some high-profile political voices are sounding the alarm about a potentially rigged election in November.

Among them are Mike Benz, the executive director of the Foundation For Freedom Online, and billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk. . .

Just two days ago, Benz, a former State Department cyber expert, had another eye-opening exchange with Musk regarding the upcoming election, focusing on the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s targeting of Trump fans. . .

He was posting a warning from America First Legal which indicated: “Internal docs from Biden’s DHS show their plans to target Trump [supporters] as domestic extremists.

“The Brennan-Clapper intel group discussed how ‘most of the domestic terrorism threat now comes from supporters of the former president.'” (Read more from “‘Surreal to Watch’: With Trump Ahead, Stolen Election Seen ‘In Crystal Clarity'” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

CNN Silences Trump Campaign’s Karoline Leavitt: The Truth is ‘Triggering’

In a startling display of media bias, CNN abruptly cut off Trump campaign national press secretary Karoline Leavitt’s microphone mid-interview on Monday. Leavitt’s crime? Daring to highlight CNN anchor Jake Tapper’s history of anti-Trump rhetoric ahead of Thursday’s presidential debate, which Tapper is set to co-host.

During a pre-debate interview on CNN, Karoline Leavitt made a brief reference to Jake Tapper’s extensive history of criticizing Trump. This point was particularly relevant as Tapper is one of the moderators for the upcoming debate. However, CNN’s Kasie Hunt, unable to tolerate the mention, abruptly cut Leavitt’s microphone, effectively silencing her.

Following the incident, Leavitt expressed her disbelief and frustration. “CNN cutting off my microphone for bringing up a debate moderator’s history of anti-Trump lies just proves our point that President Trump will not be treated fairly in Thursday’s debate,” she stated.

Speaking to Benny Johnson immediately after being cut off, she remarked, “I still can’t believe this happened. It is really shocking just how triggering the truth is to CNN.” She explained that her intention was merely to point out Trump’s boldness in agreeing to participate in a debate on a network that has shown clear hostility towards him.

“That’s all I was doing was pointing out the fact that President Trump is bold to go on a three on one fight on a network that is clearly hostile to him,” she said. Leavitt further criticized CNN, stating, “Let’s stop pretending like CNN is still the most trusted name in news. They are not, and I pointed out statements that Jake Tapper himself has made in the past.”

Kasie Hunt defended her actions by claiming that Leavitt showed disrespect to her colleague, Jake Tapper. “You come on my show, you respect my colleagues. Period,” Hunt stated.

This incident is more than just a technical glitch or a minor spat. It highlights a significant issue in the media landscape: the blatant bias against conservative voices and, specifically, against Donald Trump. “You cut off my microphone for bringing up the debate moderator’s history of anti-Trump lies. This proved our point that President Trump will not be treated fairly on Thursday,” Leavitt asserted.