WATCH: Biden History of Plagiarism Surfaces in Devastating Video

Former Vice President Joe Biden’s history of plagiarism is haunting the presumed Democrat nominee for president.

A devastating video was posted that highlights Biden’s past examples of plagiarism and lying about his academic record.

The push back against Biden followed his recent speech where the former vice president used President Trump’s “Buy American” platform.

President Trump called Biden out for taking his idea. . .

(Read more from “WATCH: Biden History of Plagiarism Surfaces in Devastating Video” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

TO MY FELLOW INNER CITY RESIDENTS: Here’s How the Biden Family’s Crimes Were Handled vs. the Rest of Us

Oh, I live in an urban area, just so ya know. It’s diverse, amazing and fun. And I ain’t leavin’, period.

But, say, in the interest of promoting the [INSERT COLOR HERE] Lives Matter movements (so many cats, so few recipes), I feel compelled to unleash the “double-standard” trump card. After all, we have seen Hillary Clinton preemptively exonerated for multiple, willful violations of the Espionage Act.

Had you or I violated these codes, we’d be part-way through a sentence at Leavenworth. Which is not as fun as it sounds.

That said, please note how the deep state Beltway notifies us of these kindsa stories…

In August 2019, Caroline Biden, 33, a niece of former Vice President Biden, was busted in Lower Merion Township, Penn., for driving under the influence and without a license, public records show. While the case is active, it’s unlikely Caroline will face much in the way of consequences — if history and Biden family rap sheets are any guide.

Her arrest, which was never made public, was at least the ninth among Joe Biden’s close family, and followed incidents involving his brother Frank, his son Hunter and his daughter Ashley. The cases — ranging from felony theft to drug possession — were all either thrown out, or resulted in light sentences with no jail time, according to a Post review of public records and published reports.

The Pennsylvania drunken-driving collar was the third run-in with the law for Caroline, who is the daughter of Joe’s younger brother, James Biden Sr. In September 2013, she was booked for allegedly hitting an NYPD officer during a full scale meltdown at her Tribeca apartment, following a dispute with a roommate over unpaid rent. The case was dismissed after Caroline agreed to anger management treatment.

Oh, wait. There’s more (emphases mine):

Joe Biden’s brother, Francis ‘Frank’ Biden, 66, won the prize for the most bizarre Biden family bust when he allegedly stuffed two DVDs from a Florida Blockbuster down his pants in October 2003, cops said. He was 49 at the time. He never showed up for a scheduled court hearing on the attempted theft and the state attorney declined to prosecute, according to records obtained by the Miami New Times.

He had more serious scrapes with the law. He was pinched in August 2003 for drunk driving in Fort Lauderdale, earning six months probation. He was arrested a year later for driving with a suspended license but avoided jail again by spending three months in rehab. In 1999, Biden was a passenger in a car involved in a fatal drunk-driving accident. He was found partially liable for the death of 38-year-old William Albano, and owes his family almost $1 million dollars, according to the Daily Mail.

But I’m sure the Biden kclan was treated just as you or I would have been.

THE BIDEN BUSTS
The rap sheets, and favorable court outcomes, of four Joe Biden relatives

Ashley Biden, Daughter, 39
Charge: Pot possession in New Orleans in 1999. No conviction recorded.
Charge: Attempting to obstruct a police officer in Chicago in 2002. Dropped.

Frank Biden, Brother, 66
Charge: DUI in Florida in 2003. Six months probation.
Charge: Petty theft in Florida in 2003. Dropped.
Charge: Driving with suspended license in Florida in 2004. Three months in rehab.

Caroline Biden, Niece, 33
Charge: Resisting arrest, obstruction of government administration, harassment in NYC, 2013. Case dismissed.
Charge: Grand and petty larceny in NYC in 2017. Two years probation; restitution of $110,000 in stolen credit card charges.
Charge: DUI, driving without a licence in Pennsylvania in 2019. Case pending.

Hunter Biden, Son, 50
Charge: Drug possession in New Jersey in 1988. Pretrial intervention program, records expunged.

Well, those are all probably coincidences.

But there aren’t really aren’t two systems of justice. No way.

I’m sure the Biden family — with Joe’s $10 million+ estate — is above reproach. I really believe that. (For more from the author of “TO MY FELLOW INNER CITY RESIDENTS: Here’s How the Biden Family’s Crimes Were Handled vs. the Rest of Us” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Mass Fraud: Thousands of North Carolina Voters Double-Voted, Watchdog Group Finds

Thousands of voters in North Carolina voted twice in one or both of the past two elections, according to a court filing in the key battleground state.

Public Interest Legal Foundation, an election integrity group, announced Thursday that it had filed a brief in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina outlining the number of double votes.

A total of 16,700 duplicate votes were cast in the 2016 and 2018 elections, according to an audit by the watchdog group based on public records.

North Carolina was home to a disputed voter fraud case in 2018.

Public Interest Legal Foundation made the court filing in the case of Democracy NC et. al. v. North Carolina State Board of Elections, which seeks to suspend North Carolina’s protections for mail-in voters during the presidential election in November in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Specifically, the state’s public voter rolls show that even with election integrity mechanisms in place, voters registered in more than one precinct are credited for voting a second ballot.

This could be an individual voting twice or someone voting while using someone else’s identity. Such cases largely have resulted from poor maintenance of voter rolls at the local level—for example, not updating the rolls when voters move.

The audit found that in the 2016 presidential election in North Carolina, about 9,700 voters were credited with voting twice. Of these cases, about half—or 5,000—were mail-in ballots.

Two years later, during the 2018 midterm election, about 7,000 voters were credited with voting twice. Of those, 2,900 were mail-in votes, the audit says.

It is not clear how many of the same voters voted twice in both elections.

In one of the most high-profile voter fraud cases in recent years, the North Carolina State Board of Elections decertified the outcome of the 2018 race in the 9th Congressional District and ordered a new election after evidence of absentee ballot fraud emerged.

In that race, 61% of all mailed votes were cast for Republican Mark Harris over Democrat Dan McCready, although only 16% of those requesting a ballot were Republicans. In the new election, Republican Dan Bishop stepped in as the party nominee and won.

“This is a widespread concern in North Carolina,” J. Christian Adams, president and general counsel of Public Interest Legal Foundation, said in a written statement. “We should be talking about how to strengthen our systems against misdeeds done out of the sight of election officials in 2020 instead of defending an imperfect system from total ruin.”

Those suing, Adams said, “are only raising the threat of worsening the settled fact that voter fraud is most common in the mail.”

The lawsuit in North Carolina by Democracy NC, the League of Women Voters, and others calls for waiving requirements that voter registration forms be submitted 25 days before an election, eliminating the witness signature on absentee ballots, allowing ballots to be received in ways other than mail, such as contactless dropboxes, and increasing early voting. (For more from the author of “Mass Fraud: Thousands of North Carolina Voters Double-Voted, Watchdog Group Finds” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Online Ads Prompt Theory That Wayfair is Involved in Child Sex Trafficking

By Bruce Golding. A conspiracy theory emerged Friday that the Wayfair online store was using the sale of storage cabinets as a cover for child trafficking — which the home decor company immediately denounced as false.

A post on the social media website Reddit noted the high cost of the furniture — along with the fact that each item was identified by a female name — as potential evidence of the purported scandal, Newsweek reported.

The prices for the cabinets — called Alyvia, Neriah, Samiyah and Yaritza — ranged from $12,699.99 to $14,499.99 each, according to a screenshot posted in the “r/conspiracy” subreddit.

“Is it possible Wayfair involved in Human trafficking with their WFX Utility collection? Or are these just extremely overpriced cabinets? (Note the names of the cabinets) this makes me sick to my stomach if it’s true :(,” user PrincessPeach1987 wrote Thursday.

The post quickly drew more than 700 comments from the subreddit’s 1.3 million members, including the assertion that “some of the names are missing children.” (Read more about this child sex trafficking conspiracy theory HERE)

____________________________________________

The Person Who Started the Wayfair Conspiracy Speaks

By Andrew Whalen. The Wayfair conspiracy theory that became a social media sensation on Friday began with a post to the Conspiracy subreddit, which promotes user-submitted conspiracy theories, many thinly evidenced or unevidenced, to more than a million subscribers.

“Is it possible Wayfair involved in Human trafficking with their WFX Utility collection? Or are these just extremely overpriced cabinets? (Note the names of the cabinets) this makes me sick to my stomach if it’s true,” redditor PrincessPeach1987 posted on Thursday, alongside a screenshot from Wayfair’s mobile website featuring four storage cabinets—products named Neriah, Yaritza, Samiyah and Alyvia—that cost between $12,699.99 and $14,499.99.

In chat conversations with Newsweek . . . PrincessPeach1987, who declined to reveal their non-redditor identity, described themselves as “involved in a local organization that helps victims of human trafficking,” which has led her to be “suspicious most of the time now.” They characterized their Reddit post as less of a direct accusation and more of an effort to “see if anyone else had more details” . . .

Supporters of the theory have also urged skeptics to use a Russian search engine to search for the stock keeping unit number (SKU) associated with various Wayfair products, which returns image results full of children in bathing suits. . .

Supporters of the theory have also drawn connections to June 2019 protests by Wayfair employees, which objected to the company selling furnishings to a Texas detention facility for migrant children. The facility subsequently closed. (Read more about this child sex trafficking conspiracy theory HERE)

WATCH: World Health Organization Chief Starts Crying as He Slams ‘Tragedy’ of Donald Trump

By Standard UK. The head of the World Health Organisation was reduced to tears as he berated the “tragedy” of Donald Trump formally moving to withdraw the US.

Dr Tedros Adhanom became tearful during a press conference hours after the US president notified the UN and Congress that he was pulling all funding from the global health body.

“This is a tragedy that…” he said on Thursday, his voice cracking. “Actually, it’s forcing us to miss many of our friends, losing many lives.”

After a long pause, seemingly lost for words, he said, his voice shaking: “And we cannot defeat this pandemic as a divided world. The Covid-19 pandemic is a test of global solidarity and global leadership. . .

“Are we unable to distinguish or identify the common enemy? Can’t we understand that the divisions or the cracks between us actually are the advantage for the virus?” (Read more from “WATCH: World Health Organization Chief Starts Crying as He Slams ‘Tragedy’ of Donald Trump” HERE)

_____________________________________________________

WHO Chief Taps Ex-Leaders to Head COVID-19 Response Panel

By ABC News. The head of the World Health Organization said Thursday that former Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf and former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark will head a new panel tasked with giving “an honest assessment” of the global response to the coronavirus pandemic.

WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, whose agency is facing a U.S. pullout following Trump administration complaints about its early handling of the virus emergency, announced the appointments to the newly created Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response.

“I cannot imagine two more strong-minded, independent leaders to help guide us through this critical learning process to help us understand what happened — an honest assessment — and to help us understand also what we should do to prevent such a tragedy in the future,” Tedros said.

The WHO chief reiterated his calls for global unity and decried a general lack of leadership, but he made no reference to the Trump administration giving formal 1-year notice this week of its intent to withdraw the United States from the U.N. health agency. (Read more from “WHO Chief Taps Ex-Leaders to Head COVID-19 Response Panel” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

President Trump Commutes Roger Stone Sentence; Stone: Trump May Have Saved My Life

Trump Commutes Sentence of Roger Stone in Case He Long Denounced

By The New York Times. President Trump commuted the sentence of his longtime friend Roger J. Stone Jr. on seven felony crimes on Friday, using the power of his office to spare a former campaign adviser days before Mr. Stone was to report to a federal prison to serve a 40-month term.

In a lengthy written statement punctuated by the sort of inflammatory language and angry grievances characteristic of the president’s Twitter feed, the White House denounced the “overzealous prosecutors” who convicted Mr. Stone on “process-based charges” stemming from the “witch hunts” and “Russia hoax” investigation. (Read more from “President Trump Commutes Roger Stone Sentence” HERE)

__________________________________________________

White House’s Statement Regarding Stone Sentence Commutation

Today, President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Grant of Clemency commuting the unjust sentence of Roger Stone, Jr.

Roger Stone is a victim of the Russia Hoax that the Left and its allies in the media perpetuated for years in an attempt to undermine the Trump Presidency. There was never any collusion between the Trump Campaign, or the Trump Administration, with Russia. Such collusion was never anything other than a fantasy of partisans unable to accept the result of the 2016 election. The collusion delusion spawned endless and farcical investigations, conducted at great taxpayer expense, looking for evidence that did not exist. As it became clear that these witch hunts would never bear fruit, the Special Counsel’s Office resorted to process-based charges leveled at high-profile people in an attempt to manufacture the false impression of criminality lurking below the surface. These charges were the product of recklessness borne of frustration and malice.This is why the out-of-control Mueller prosecutors, desperate for splashy headlines to compensate for a failed investigation, set their sights on Mr. Stone. Roger Stone is well known for his nearly 50 years of work as a consultant for high-profile Republican politicians, including President Ronald Reagan, Senator Bob Dole, and many others. He is also well known for his outspoken support for President Donald J. Trump and opposition to Hillary Clinton.

Mr. Stone was charged by the same prosecutors from the Mueller Investigation tasked with finding evidence of collusion with Russia. Because no such evidence exists, however, they could not charge him for any collusion-related crime. Instead, they charged him for his conduct during their investigation. The simple fact is that if the Special Counsel had not been pursuing an absolutely baseless investigation, Mr. Stone would not be facing time in prison.

In addition to charging Mr. Stone with alleged crimes arising solely from their own improper investigation, the Mueller prosecutors also took pains to make a public and shameful spectacle of his arrest. Mr. Stone is a 67-year-old man, with numerous medical conditions, who had never been convicted of another crime. But rather than allow him to surrender himself, they used dozens of FBI agents with automatic weapons and tactical equipment, armored vehicles, and an amphibious unit to execute a pre-dawn raid of his home, where he was with his wife of many years. Notably, CNN cameras were present to broadcast these events live to the world, even though they swore they were not notified—it was just a coincidence that they were there together with the FBI early in the morning.

Not only was Mr. Stone charged by overzealous prosecutors pursing a case that never should have existed, and arrested in an operation that never should have been approved, but there were also serious questions about the jury in the case. The forewoman of his jury, for example, concealed the fact that she is a member of the so-called liberal “resistance” to the Trump Presidency. In now-deleted tweets, this activist-juror vividly and openly attacked President Trump and his supporters.

Mr. Stone would be put at serious medical risk in prison. He has appealed his conviction and is seeking a new trial. He maintains his innocence and has stated that he expects to be fully exonerated by the justice system. Mr. Stone, like every American, deserves a fair trial and every opportunity to vindicate himself before the courts. The President does not wish to interfere with his efforts to do so. At this time, however, and particularly in light of the egregious facts and circumstances surrounding his unfair prosecution, arrest, and trial, the President has determined to commute his sentence. Roger Stone has already suffered greatly. He was treated very unfairly, as were many others in this case. Roger Stone is now a free man!

(Editor’s note: the White House’s statement on the Stone sentence commutation was originally published HERE)
__________________________________________________

Pelosi: Commuting Stone’s Sentence, ‘Appalling’ and ‘a Terrible Idea’

By Breitbart. Pelosi said, “I think it’s a terrible idea. Just look at this administration, the president and his henchmen, so many of his friends, advisers, campaign chairman, etc. are in jail. And for the president to be able to issue a pardon on the basis of a crime that the person committed assisting the president is ridiculous. And we have — there ought to be a law, and I’m recommending that we pass a law that presidents cannot issue a pardon if the crime that the person is in jail for is one that is caused by protecting the president, which this was. It’s appalling.” (Read more from “Pelosi: Commuting Stone’s Sentence, ‘Appalling’ and ‘a Terrible Idea’” HERE)

__________________________________________________

Stone: The President May Have Saved My Life

By Carl Campanile. President Trump may well have just saved his life, an elated and relieved Roger Stone told The Post moments after learning his sentence was commuted — from Trump himself.

“I’m obviously very pleased,” Stone, 67, said shortly after Trump called his Fort Lauderdale, Florida, home with the good news on Friday night. . .

“I told him I was grateful,” Stone told The Post of his chat with the president.

“He protected my health.”

Stone added, “He believes in justice. I felt pretty confident that if he heard the facts of my case, he would make the right decision. (Read more about reaction to commutation of Stone sentence HERE)
__________________________________________________
Earlier Report: Trump Expected to Commute Roger Stone Sentence

By Fox News. President Trump is expected to announce that he will commute Roger Stone’s sentence, just days before the longtime political operative is slated to report to prison to serve more than three years for charges stemming from former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, Fox News has learned.

Sources told Fox News Friday that the president could announce a commutation of Stone’s sentence as early as Friday evening.

The president, as recently as Friday morning, has said he was “looking at” offering Stone clemency, saying he was “very unfairly treated.”

Stone was set to report to prison on July 14 to serve 40 months. He was sentenced in February to more than three years in prison after being convicted in November 2019 on seven counts of obstruction, witness tampering and making false statements to Congress on charges that stemmed from Mueller’s investigation. Stone, however, has appealed his conviction and continues to deny any wrongdoing.

Trump, for weeks, has signaled he could be open to granting Stone clemency — tweeting last month that Stone was “a victim of a corrupt and illegal Witch Hunt, one which will go down as the greatest political crime in history. He can sleep well at night!” (Read more from “Report: Trump Expected to Commute Roger Stone Sentence” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

What You’re Not Being Told About Joe Biden’s Fundraising

Media reports on the June fundraising totals would have you believe that Joe Biden “tops” or “beats” President Trump. However, whoever is running Joe Biden’s campaign better keep the corks in the champagne bottles, because the truth is June was a terrible month for Joe Biden and the Democrat Party.

Joe Biden was an anemic fundraiser throughout his primary battle. A report from Politico in October of 2019 said Biden was getting “crushed” in fundraising. It argued, “Obama and Clinton’s biggest donors favor Biden, yet he still can’t match his rivals’ cash flow.” According to the report, Biden had more big-money bundlers and donors from Obama and Clinton than any of his competitors. Now, as the presumptive nominee, the rest should presumably be in his corner now, as well.

However, during a primary, the value of big donors and high-dollar bundlers is greatly reduced by federal contribution limits — it was why Biden consistently struggled, and it was why Bernie’s grassroots dollars made him such a prolific fundraiser. Biden, along with every other candidate, was limited to receiving a maximum of $5,600 contribution from an individual or $11,200 from a couple. . .

This modest haul nonetheless required a substantial amount of effort. Joe Biden brought in the Democrat Party’s top fundraising heavy-weights: former President Barack Obama, Senator Elizabeth Warren, and Senator Kamala Harris. He also leaned on Hollywood elites such as Melissa Etheridge and Kristin Chenoweth to help prop up his fundraising. Some of the most prolific Democrat money-people all hosted events for Biden, as well. It appeared to be a truly Herculean effort.

The simple reality is that Joe Biden is failing to capture the enthusiasm of his own supporters, let alone the undecided voters whose support he will need in order to be successful in November. The reality of Biden’s predicament becomes even more dire when you realize this enthusiasm gap is reminiscent of the lukewarm feelings inspired by Mitt Romney and John Kerry, two of the most milquetoast candidates in the history of presidential campaigns. (Read more from “What You’re Not Being Told About Joe Biden’s Fundraising” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

WATCH: 3 Armed Men Attempt Home Invasion on a Gun Collector, but the Homeowner Is Ready; Sheriff Credits 2nd Amendment

According to police, three armed men attempted a home invasion on a self-described gun enthusiast, and only one of the three made it out alive.

Pasco County Sheriff Chris Nocco related what the police believed happened in a video statement on Friday. The incident occurred at a home in Wesley Chapel, Florida, that morning.

Nocco said that a homeowner was playing video games by himself when he heard someone break the glass towards the back of his house.

The homeowner grabbed a firearm and accosted three intruders in a narrow hallway of his home. He told police that the first intruder was wearing a black mask and dark clothing, and pointing a gun in his direction. . .

The homeowner then saw a third intruder, fired at him, and saw him fall on top of the other bodies. According to the homeowner, his gun jammed, allowing the third intruder to run away while the homeowner went to get another gun.

(Read more from “Three Armed Men Attempt Home Invasion on a Gun Collector, but the Homeowner Is Ready (VIDEO)” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Death Sentences for Two American Political Prisoners

It is among the most shocking, un-American concepts that we have political prisoners in this country.

Now, two people known to many conservatives, who fit the age and health conditions of who should be given home release from prison during the coronavirus pandemic, face death sentences because they are still in, or going into, prison.

Speaking Wednesday on WMAL’s Larry O’Connor Show just days before heading to prison for 40 months, Roger Stone described not only being recently censored by Facebook, but talks about his politicized, unfair trial before Judge Amy Berman Jackson.

Stone told O’Connor that his age, the comorbidity of his asthma, and the non-violent nature of the crime for which he was sentenced make him eligible for home detention. Lawyers Michael Avenatti, former Trump lawyer turned Trump enemy Michael Cohen, and others in Roger’s age or physical circumstances have been released from prison to home confinement.

But American political prisoner Roger Stone is still headed to prison.

Stone told O’Connor about the recent increase in coronavirus cases in the prison where he is headed. Judge Jackson could easily modify her sentence, and save Roger Stone’s life by allowing him to have home confinement. Roger’s case is on appeal, but COVID-19 could take his life before it’s ever heard.

Another political prisoner, our friend and conservative movement firebrand former Congressman Steve Stockman, faces even more dire consequences.

I have previously written about the total legal fraud committed against Steve that led to his imprisonment (The Persecution Of Congressman Steve Stockman), and more recent efforts by leaders of the conservative movement to seek his release to home confinement during the pandemic (Conservative Leaders Urge Humanitarian Release For Former Rep. Steve Stockman). We wrote:

Prisoners with pre-existing bad health conditions are particularly vulnerable to being infected in over-crowded cells, dorms, and feeding facilities. These prisoners were sentenced for crimes, but the present circumstances literally make them at risk for a death sentence, a punishment that does not fit their crimes. ***

A perfect example of a prisoner who fits criteria of who should be removed from prison is former Texas Congressman Steve Stockman, who at age 63, with diabetes and a lung condition, and who was being denied medication in prison even before the coronavirus outbreak, is serving under what many have reason to believe was a political prosecution — after three failed grand juries before a fourth indicted him — for criticizing the Obama administration, the lawlessness at the IRS under Lois Lerner, and corruption in the Ukraine. A successful man of intense Christian faith, Steve poses no danger to society, but remaining in prison may be a death sentence for him.

While Democrat cities are releasing violent rioters and anarchists under the auspices of bail reform, our prison system remains a tin can of death-in-waiting for political prisoners Steve Stockman and Roger Stone.

A study published on July 8 (COVID-19 Cases and Deaths in Federal and State Prisons) notes that the novel COVID-19 “represents a challenge to prisons because of the close confinement, limited access to personal protective equipment, and elevated burden of cardiac and respiratory conditions that exacerbate COVID-19 risk among prisoners.” The report says, “[t]he COVID-19 case rate for prisoners was 5.5 times higher than the US population case rate of 587 per 100,000.”

Steve Stockman’s situation is particularly egregious.

Camp personnel have sometimes let him go with only one dose of insulin per day and, on at least one occasion, no doses. Even when properly administered twice daily, he goes for up to 15 hours without insulin between mid-afternoon and the next morning. Steve takes prescription Zinc due to a condition of malabsorption he suffers resulting from surgery years ago that prevents his proper uptake of vitamins and nutrients. The Bureau of Prisons has refused to fill his prescription for Zinc since February.

In mid-April, his paperwork for home confinement due to COVID-19 was all signed and approved. On April 23 Steve was again reconfirmed for transfer to home confinement, and was asked for his prisoner number to verify his name and status. He was cleared.

However, the next day, while entering the quarantine room, Steve was stopped and told he was taken off the list. Counselor Ms. Battles assured Steve that his name was still on the list, but she did not know why he was told he was taken off.

Subsequently, Steve was told various reasons he was removed, including Camp Administrator Ms. Carbone’s very odd explanation on Sunday, April 26, that he would be safer there at the Correction Complex than at home with his wife. But as of June 23, Beaumont, Texas units where Steve is imprisoned reported 10 staffers with the virus, 5 inmates in the Low unit (which includes the Camp where Steve is located), and one inmate death.

Steve meets all of the conditions for home confinement consistent with a memo released by Bureau of Prisons on Furlough and Home Confinement.

But when Steve later pressed his question further, he was told he isn’t leaving prison, and that the directions came from someone “high up.”

The number of COVID-19 infections at the Beaumont facility has now skyrocketed to 180 cases as of July 9, and like nursing homes in Democrat states, infected prisoners are being knowingly and recklessly transferred in with persons at risk. Through sources, we hear the situation in the prison is “spinning out of control.”

Both Steve Stockman and Roger Stone were convicted on trumped-up charges that would not result in severe criminal sentences for Democrats, establishment Republicans, and certainly not members of the Deep State. Judges denied their constitutional rights at trial by refusing to allow both to fully explain how they were targeted by the Deep State for their outspoken political positions.

Their unfair, biased treatment by the criminal justice system and the prison system is bad enough, but now may result in a death sentence.

But what evil government systems that hold political prisoners wouldn’t prefer them dead anyway?

Take action.

People in corrupt government systems know they can get away with bad things because most Americans who would be offended don’t pay attention.

Those who work in the Deep State fear sunlight on themselves and their abuses. So we need to put sunlight on them.

I urge my readers to not only tweet this article, and use their other social media and blogs to get this story out, but reprint this entire article or portions of it — even in your name. I waive copyrights.

Write letters to newspaper editors, call in to talk shows, and expose, expose, expose what’s going on. Make this go viral.

Because Christ’s teaching made clear our obligation to reach out to those in prison, I expect most people who read this are people of faith who will act on it.

Let President Trump, Vice President Pence, and White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows know you want justice for Roger Stone and Steve Stockman.

A fourth person at the same White House contact information to whom I urge you to reach out is Jared Kushner, who was the principal driver of the Second Chance Act and President Trump’s successful prison reform efforts.

Call the White House switch board at 202-456-1414, or write them at:

The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

(For more from the author of “Death Sentences for Two American Political Prisoners” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Here’s What This Liberal University Did When an Incoming Student Dared to Say She Supported Trump

Marquette University has threatened to reconsider their admission acceptance of a recent high school graduate, citing a pro-Trump video the teen posted to social media.

Samantha Pfefferle, an 18-year-old girl, said in an interview with The College Fix that her admission to the university was no longer a guarantee and she was forced to undergo a series of morality questions in order to prove she still belonged in the school’s Class of 2024.

(Here’s the video that caused the liberal university to reconsider Samantha’s admission)

Pfefferle said she was asked how she would respond if a “Dreamer who lived down the hall” came up to her and said “she didn’t feel safe or comfortable” with the conservative views or her presence on campus.

“[He] had the heart to tell me I wasn’t a student,” Pfefferle said. “This means that my classification is still in limbo and is currently being decided by the administration.”

The video that Pfefferle posted to TikTok features the incoming freshman calling out the Trump haters and showing the world she does not care about what others think of her political beliefs.

(Read more from “Here’s What This Liberal University Did When an Incoming Student Dared to Say She Supported Trump” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE