Posts

Cruz, Jindal, Huckabee Have No Problem Naming Evil, Why Does Carly?

/8 Comments/in , /by

AFP 536265175 A GOV USA DCHow does anyone who claims to have a “personal relationship with Jesus Christ” two weeks after 9/11 praise an Islamic Civilization that has historically– and continues– to institutionalize violence against women, children, Christians, Jews, and slavery of Blacks, non-Muslims, and children over the last 1400 years?

Fox News recently highlighted Carly Fiorina’s comments, “It was my personal relationship with Jesus Christ that saved me” and “no one needs to question or tell me about my faith.”

Contrary to Scripture, Christians are in fact instructed to use Biblical discernment to correct error and advocate righteousness first and foremost among self-identifying Christians. Carly provides an excellent non-answer and continues to not take responsibility for her remarks in which two weeks after 9/11 she praised the very Islamic Civilization that caused 8 Crusades and instituted the sex slave trade and abuse of women and girls, which continues today. Not to mention the greatest terrorist attacks to ever occur on American soil.

I’ve challenged Carly Fiorina, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and many others who claim to be Christians while also advocating falsehoods about Islam.

Christians should be well aware that throughout the Bible, God commands his people to name, fight, and warn of evil. If they don’t– the blood of the innocent and martyrs is on their hands. (Ezekiel 33: 7-9). He says:

“So hear the word I speak and give them warning from me. When I say to the wicked, ‘You wicked person, you will surely die,’ and you do not speak out to dissuade them from their ways, that wicked person will die for their sin, and I will hold you accountable for their blood. But if you do warn the wicked person to turn from their ways and they do not do so, they will die for their sin, though you yourself will be saved.”

Consequences, both punishment and redemption, exist for those who heed or reject His warning:

“If someone who is righteous disobeys, that person’s former righteousness will count for nothing. And if someone who is wicked repents, that person’s former wickedness will not bring condemnation. The righteous person who sins will not be allowed to live even though they were formerly righteous.’

“If I tell a righteous person that they will surely live, but then they trust in their righteousness and do evil, none of the righteous things that person has done will be remembered; they will die for the evil they have done. And if I say to a wicked person, ‘You will surely die,’ but they then turn away from their sin and do what is just and right— if they give back what they took in pledge for a loan, return what they have stolen, follow the decrees that give life, and do no evil—that person will surely live; they will not die. None of the sins that person has committed will be remembered against them. They have done what is just and right; they will surely live.”

Christians are commanded to provide for and protect widows and orphans (the majority of whom exist in 57 Islamic-majority countries.) James, Jesus’s half-brother, remarked, “Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.” (James 1:27).

Further still, Timothy warned, “Anyone who does not provide for their relatives, and especially for their own household, has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.” (1 Tim. 5:8).

The primary contribution of all Islamic civilizations, past and present, is death and destruction.

Since the mid-late 600s, Islamic military invasions spanned from North Africa, to Spain, France, the Mediterranean, Balkan, Asian and East Asian and former Russian and Mongol territories. No Muslims existed in Jerusalem until their final and successful invasion in 1244. The Dome of the Rock was specifically built on top of Israel’s holiest site, the Temple Mount.

Yet, the God of the Bible pleads for his people to choose life. He said,

“This day I call the heavens and the earth as witnesses against you that I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your children may liveand that you may love the Lord your God, listen to his voice, and hold fast to him. For the Lord is your life.” (Deut. 30:19, 20).

It is to life that Christian Governors Mike Huckabee and Bobby Jindal, and Senator Ted Cruz consistently point.

Cruz recently pointed to the Ninth Commandment, “’Thou shalt not bear false witness,’ when clarifying that, “When we call evil by its name, it has a clarifying power that has never been more needed than it is this instant, right now.”

Last fall, standing outside of the Auschwitz Concentration Camp, Huckabee remarked,“The very people who created the death industry and ‘scientifically’ and medically experimented on prisoners … went home every day, ate dinner with their families, played with their children, went to concerts, and lived normal lives, knowing all the while those under their authority were living in horror.”

As political leaders, they are required to name and fight evil. Elected officials have taken oaths to defend American citizens and the U.S. Constitution from threats both foreign and domestic. Article VI of the Constitution requires federal officials to swear, “to support this Constitution.” The U.S. statute 5 U.S.C. 3331 specifies officials to “solemnly swear [or affirm]” that they “will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic” and “will bear true faith and allegiance to the same.”

These leaders have not hesitated to name evil. But more importantly, they continue to promote that which is good, which best contributes to human flourishing.

Leadership and Christianity both require what Andrew Breitbart admonished, “No matter what the threat, no matter what the peril, stand up, speak the truth. Speak truth to power and call evil by its name.”

Praising a civilization that caused death and destruction both during the 800 years Carly cites, and today, bears false witness. Worse still, condoning institutionalized violence against women and children opposes everything Biblical and the nature of Christianity itself. (Re-posted with permission, “Cruz, Jindal, Huckabee Have No Problem Naming Evil, Why Does Carly?” originally appeared HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Planned Parenthood Praises Women Who Support Black Genocide

/0 Comments/in , /by

mqdefaultPlanned Parenthood’s Maggie Awards praises women who its organization believes emulates one of the most influential eugenicists in America, Margaret Sanger. Margaret Sanger saw Blacks and immigrants as weeds who should be sterilized. In a June 1932 edition of her Birth Control Review, an editorial, “The Negro Number,” said of Blacks:

“Shall they go in for quantity or quality in children? Shall they bring children into the world to enrich the undertakers, the physicians and furnish work for social workers and jailers, or shall they produce children who are going to be an asset to the group and American society?” Most [blacks], especially women, would choose quality … if they only knew how.”

During the Great Depression, bringing a Black child into a hostile world was considered “pathetic.” Sanger’s friend, Walter A. Terpenning, wrote in “God’s Chillun”:

The birth of a colored child, even to parents who can give it adequate support, is pathetic in view of the unchristian and undemocratic treatment likely to be accorded it at the hands of a predominantly white community, and the denial of choice in propagation to this unfortunate class is nothing less than barbarous.

Sanger asked Dr. Gamble of Procter and Gamble to use Southern ministers to teach blacks about the importance of preventing pregnancies under the guise of “family planning.” She wrote in 1939:

“The minister’s work is also important and he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

Black babies’ bodies are being suctioned apart by Planned Parenthood and sold to companies like Stem Express for “donations.” The only difference between Planned Parenthood and the Ku Klux Klan is that the “mastas” are white women earning millions from black women who don’t get paid for their child’s sold body parts.

Courtesy of the Vorthos Forum:

(Re-posted with permission “Planned Parenthood Praises Women Who Support Black Genocide” originally appeared HERE)

_______________________________________________________

Daily Beast’s Seven Errors (Maybe More) on Fiorina, Blankley and Islam

It’s obvious from a post yesterday by Dean Obeidallah, a Daily Beast blogger, that at least seven errors should be corrected to set the record straight about me, my recent column on (one of many reasons) why I won’t vote for Carly Fiorina, and Islam.

Error #1. No, I’m not in the GOP. I’m neither a Republican nor a Democrat. I’m among many women and Americans who believe neither party represents them.

Error #2. No, I don’t drink coffee. But, if Islamic civilization created coffee, wouldn’t that at least have increased, even ten years ago, the 57 Islamic-controlled countries’ combined contribution of only 5 percent to the world’s GDP?

Error #3. Yes, I’ve been to a hospital, but you’d have to take my parents’ word for it, or my non-forged, authentic birth certificate. And, if the Islamic civilization invented hospitals, who healed the sick and the lame during the first three centuries, or, later in convents, well before 622 AD?

Error #4. No, I’m not interested in running for Congress, but I do admire foster mothers like Michele Bachmann, and many others, who selflessly love and provide for children whose birth mothers could not.

Error #5. Mr. Obeidallah must be aware that news editors choose which hyperlinks to include when publishing columns. For whatever reason, what he cited excluded some hyperlinks viewable on other sites that published the same column.

One links to Carly Fiorina’s speech15 days after 911. Others link to columns and radio shows: Iran’s Heritage; America’s foreign policy towards Iran since 1953; the non-deal with Iran; treason here, here, and here; and Iranian women working (note paragraphs 13-17).

Error #6. If genuinely interested in discussing religious freedom, either in America, or elsewhere, I can easily identify every text in my Qur’an clearly revealing no such freedom exists.

The European Court on Human Rights has repeatedly ruled that Shari’a law is “incompatible with the fundamental principles of democracy.”

Yet, Islamic organizations have spent millions to transform American courts to become Shari’a compliant. Even the majority of Muslims polled in America and worldwide prefer Shari’a law, not the Constitution.

Error #7. No one can rationally deny that Islam institutionalizes violence against women and girls.

To be “anti-Islam” is to be for protecting girls’ and woman’s rights — especially those living in Islamic-controlled countries.

To be “anti-Islam” is to advocate for powerless and voiceless women and children.

There is nothing bigoted, racist, “phobic,” or hateful about opposing and seeking to rescue women and children from the very ideology that rejects universally accepted human rights laws designed to protect them.

To defend Islam (and Shari’a law) is to endorse:

Female genital mutilation (genitals being cut and sewn shut),

Honor killings (fathers or brothers kill their daughters/sisters),

Child marriage (girls under age 12 are married to adult men),

Slavery (girls are sold for “protection” by their parents and/or kidnapped and sold at slave bazaars),

Shari’a Councils (Imams marry girls – even for one hour– to men, then divorce them only to marry them to another man and divorce them again),

Wife abuse and domestic violence (husbands are instructed to beat their wives as a form of punishment); husbands are permitted to rape their wives,

Non-legal status for women who are considered property (a wife’s legal rights equate to only half of her husband’s),

Discrimination, punishment, and death for everyone based on sexual and religious orientation, especially if they will not “convert” to Islam.

By defending Islam is Mr. Obeidallah suggesting that women and girls should be legally subjugated to these practices?

If Islamic civilization has contributed so greatly to the world, and to the fictional American “heritage” Carly Fiorina suggests, perhaps she and Mr. Obeidallah can explain why “refugees” and “asylum seekers” are increasingly entering America and Western Europe by the millions, every year— from Islamic-controlled countries.

As a woman, I would never vote for anyone—especially another woman—who believes America’s hope lies in the poorest people in the world of whom the majority is illiterate. I would argue the reverse. Their hope lies in the unalienable rights protected by the U.S. Constitution, and by those willing to defend these rights from threats both foreign and domestic.

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Carly Fiorina Fails to Disavow Her Praise of Islam in Post 9/11 Speech, Pushes Conservatives Away

/22 Comments/in , /by

25610-carly-fiorina-facebook.800w.tnTwo weeks after 9/11, on September 26, 2001, Carly Fiorina gave a speech, “Technology, Business and Our Way of Life: What’s Next,” in which she tied courage, leadership, heroes, and “the questions of life and death” to business leaders learning from one of the greatest civilizations to ever exist: Islamic civilization. Her claims evidence her exceptional ineptitude or blatant, galling, willful deceit.

Consider her claims about Islam and America. She says, America is “indebted” to the Islamic civilization, whose “gifts are very much a part of our heritage.”

John Adams and Thomas Jefferson would agree, in that they commissioned merchant marines, the Marine Corp, and the Navy to defend America from Islamic invaders.

Consider her claims about the Ottoman Empire:

“When other nations were afraid of ideas, this civilization thrived on them, and kept them alive. When censors threatened to wipe out knowledge from past civilizations, this civilization kept the knowledge alive, and passed it on to others.” Censorship did exist, but under Suleiman’s rule and Islamic Shari’a law, which, is exactly what Islamists are seeking to reinstate today.

Under Suleiman three continents were “allowed a degree of peace and prosperity that had never been known.” And, the “Islamic world from the year 800 to 1600, which included the Ottoman Empire and the courts of Baghdad, Damascus and Cairo, and enlightened rulers like Suleiman the Magnificent … contributed to our notions of tolerance and civic leadership.” One need only read historical evidence of Suleiman’s numerous military conquests, whose methods are nearly identical to those of ISIS.

The Ottoman Empire “was driven more than anything, by invention. Its mathematicians created the algebra and algorithms that would enable the building of computers, and the creation of encryption.”

And: America’s technology industry “would not exist without the contributions of Arab mathematicians.”

The Spartans, Leon Battista Alberti, and Thomas Jefferson were the inventors of encryption; and they weren’t Islamists.

Charles Babbage, an English mathematician, philosopher, mechanical engineer, and scientist originated the concept of a programmable computer in 1822, which he built upon in 1837. He also designed a printer.

Centuries earlier, in 1597, Galileo invented and established a factory that constructed instruments to perform trigonometric calculations, multiplication and division, square and cube root, comparison of areas and volumes, currency exchange rates, monetary interest, and various military problems.

Neither Babbage nor Galileo were Islamists.

Where did Carly come up with this nonsense—from talking to Aladdin on a magical carpet ride? Her claims top even the mystical fantasies of The Arabian Nights.

For the truth, however, Islamabad writer Dr. Farrukh Saleem pointed out in 2005 indisputable facts about the Islamic world.

Today, the 57 Islamic countries are the world’s poorest and most illiterate:

The GDP of 57 Muslim countries is less than $2 trillion

Muslims comprise roughly 22 percent of the world’s population but only produce less than 5 percent of global GDP

20 percent of Arabs live on less than $2 per day

The average growth rate of per capita income in the Arab world hovers around .5 percent per year [worse than everywhere else except for sub-Saharan Africa]

60 percent of Muslims worldwide are illiterate

50 percent of Arab women cannot read.

Dr. Javaid Laghari adds that 40 percent of the Muslim states’ population falls below the poverty line.

Today, the 57 Islamic countries contribute the least to scientific and technological advancement, let alone have computers or use the Internet. Saleem points out that over a period of more than 105 years, only two (2) Muslims won the Nobel Peace Prize. (They studied Physics and Chemistry in Italy, the U.K., and California). Only eight (8) Muslims are Nobel Laureates.

Shouldn’t a leader of Hewlett-Packard have known at the time of her speech that of the entire Arab population, only:

1 percent has a personal computer—and; .5 percent uses the Internet.

To reiterate the facts, the 57 Islamic countries are the world’s poorest, most illiterate, and contribute the least to scientific and technological advancement, let alone have computers or use the Internet.

Yet—this future—represented by the achievements of Islamic civilizations, is what Carly suggested should be America’s hope. Two weeks after 9/11.

A former CEO who “created a larger company with more debt,” laid off 30,000 employees, expanded Hewlett-Packard’s outsourcing while not offering a solution to reverse America’s trade deficit, pointed to poverty and illiteracy as the source of America’s hope.

Worse still, what business leader, or any leader for that matter, would point to the very civilization as an example of America’s hope, which had just attacked it two weeks earlier?

Politics, historical facts, and leadership aside, on the matter of “life and death,” which she mentions—for 9/11 survivors—like myself—or the few Christians who have survived genocide in 57 Islamic countries and violence throughout Europe, or kidnapped and trafficked little girls, Carly’s remarks could not be more offensive.

Perhaps she should move to Saudi Arabia where women are prohibited from driving; or Iran, where women are prohibited from working.

Her speech 14 years ago only reveals that Carly has been flying on a mystical magical carpet to nowhere for years.

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Carly Fiorina: A Conservative Candidate?

/7 Comments/in , /by

images (71)Editor’s note: Although this author does not discuss it, another indicator that Ms. Fiorina is no friend of real conservatives is Karl Rove’s staunch past support. He encouraged major GOP contributors to spend millions on Ms. Fiorina’s 2010 US Senate campaign, even though she had no chance of winning. This starved other competitive conservative Senate campaigns in Nevada, Alaska, Colorado and other states of much needed contributions.

Several of my friends have opined that Carly Fiorina would make a great VP to Donald Trump. She sounds so good, and she makes some valid points, but actions speak louder than words, as we all well know. In my book, Carly Fiorina is just another Trotskyite, and if you won’t go that far, she clearly uses Marxist techniques. Read on, and I’ll explain. . .

At HP, Carly presented herself as a realist regarding the effects of globalization. She was a strong proponent, along with other technology executives, of the expansion of the H-1B visa program. Fiorina responded against protectionism in an editorial in the Wall Street Journal, writing that while “America is the most innovative country,” it would not remain so if the country were to “run away from the reality of the global economy”. . .

Carly Fiorina chooses to believe that the Islamic Ottoman Empire was the greatest in the world. Like Chris Christie, she is snuggled with Islamists. In a speech that was given a mere two weeks after Islamic jihadists attacked America, the former HP chief executive officer gave a speech on technology, business, and our way of life. She glorified Islam and made only slight mention of European Christians and Jews having much to do with modern civilization.

I would urge you to read Fiorina, al-Mansour and the World Economic Forum, from 2010 on Canada Free Press by J.B. Williams. He states in this article:

Carly Fiorina sat on the Foundation Board of the World Economic Forum, which has observer status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council.

Congressional support for global governance will not wane on Carly’s watch. Agenda 21 and “sustainable development” are the new buzz words for “global socialism” through global governance and Carly sits on the Foundation Board at the mother ship.

We should be asking Carly to describe her long-term relationship with Dr. Khalid al-Mansour—aka Don Warden, Black Panther puppet master, Saudi Royal front-man and Obama education financier.

Fiorina sits on other Boards with al-Mansour, such as the African Leadership Academy. Al-Mansour, aka Don Warden, was the man behind the men of the Black Panther movement in the 1960s. He has long held hope for a “black nationalist” president, starting as far back as his relationship with Malcolm X. In fact, X died while speaking at one of al-Mansour’s college campus rallies.

(See also “Carly Fiorina: Islamic Civilization was “Greatest in the World.”)

Carly Fiorina talks a good game for the electorate of America, but, in reality, she is another neo-conservative player who belongs more to the noxious left than to the old Constitutional right. She’ll never get my vote. (Read more at “Carly Fiorina Is No Conservative Candidate”, HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.