Posts

DOJ Charges 30 More People Involved in Storming Minnesota Church

The Department of Justice (DOJ) charged roughly 30 more people who were involved in storming a Minnesota church in January, adding that 25 of them had already been arrested.

Attorney General Pam Bondi revealed in a post on X, that the DOJ had “unsealed an indictment charging 30 more people who took part” in the storming of Cities Church in St. Paul. Bondi warned that if people “attack a house of worship” the DOJ will find them and prosecute them.

“Today, @thejusticedept unsealed an indictment charging 30 more people who took part in the attack on Cities Church in Minnesota,” Bondi wrote in her post. “At my direction, federal agents have already arrested 25 of them, with more to come throughout the day.”

Bondi added: “YOU CANNOT ATTACK A HOUSE OF WORSHIP. If you do so, you cannot hide from us — we will find you, arrest you, and prosecute you.”

Bondi’s post comes after former CNN host Don Lemon recorded a live YouTube video of anti-ICE protesters storming Cities Church, after finding out that one of the pastors also worked for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). (Read more from “DOJ Charges 30 More People Involved in Storming Minnesota Church” HERE)

As Epstein Files Reach Congress, Massie Vows to Use ‘Nuclear Option’

Members of Congress will begin reviewing unredacted Justice Department files on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein starting Monday.

The Associated Press obtained the letter breaking down the agreement with the Justice Department. Lawmakers will be allowed to view more than 3 million previously released documents at DOJ headquarters, but may not make electronic copies and must provide at least 24 hours’ notice to access them on site. Staff members will not be permitted to assist with the review.

The arrangement comes after months of political pressure over what critics said was an overly redacted and delayed release following passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act in 2025, which requires the DOJ to make records related to Epstein’s investigations public.

Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, a co-author of the law and a leading advocate for fuller disclosure, intensified his rhetoric this week, warning that he would resort to what he described as a “nuclear option” if the Justice Department continued to withhold names of Epstein’s alleged clients from the files.

“If the victims want to give them to me, I’ve expressed that I’m willing to do that,” Massie told CNN Sunday morning. (Read more from “As Epstein Files Reach Congress, Massie Vows to Use ‘Nuclear Option’” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

New DOJ Files Show Jeffrey Epstein Facilitated Contacts With Girls for Giants Owner

Emails released by the Department of Justice this week reveal that convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein acted as an intermediary in scouting women for New York Giants co-owner Steve Tisch, facilitating introductions and evaluating potential companions in private correspondence dating back to 2013.

According to documents reviewed by The Athletic, Epstein exchanged a series of emails with Tisch in which he appeared to rate women and describe them using explicit and coded language. In several messages, Epstein categorized women as either “pro or civilian” and used terms such as “working girl” while discussing whether certain women should be introduced to Tisch.

In a May 2013 email exchange, Epstein told Tisch that he could arrange a meeting with a Russian woman if Tisch was interested. When Tisch asked whether she was a “working girl,” Epstein responded, “Never.” The correspondence continued over the following months, with Tisch inquiring about Epstein’s whereabouts in New York and suggesting a lunch meeting tied to a “surprise.”

In another exchange, Epstein referenced a woman whose name was redacted in the released documents, describing her in crude terms and offering personal commentary about her background, including that she had an older boyfriend and was attending acting school. Epstein characterized her as a short-term option and rated her physical appearance.

The emails also show that the relationship between Epstein and Tisch extended into professional sports settings. In September 2013, Tisch invited Epstein and a guest to attend a New York Giants game in his owner’s suite at MetLife Stadium. Epstein responded by inviting Tisch to visit his private Caribbean island, though the documents do not indicate whether Tisch ever traveled there.

At the time of the correspondence, Epstein’s criminal history was already well established. In 2008, he pleaded guilty to solicitation of prostitution and solicitation of prostitution involving a minor under the age of 18. He served just over a year in custody and was registered as a sex offender, a status that was publicly known years before the 2013 emails.

The newly released communications are part of a broader DOJ disclosure tied to ongoing scrutiny of Epstein’s network and associations. While the emails show Epstein facilitating introductions and discussions with Tisch, the documents do not state whether any meetings occurred beyond what was described in the correspondence.

Steve Tisch has been a co-owner of the New York Giants for more than two decades and is also a prominent film producer. Neither the emails nor the DOJ release include allegations of criminal conduct by Tisch.

100,000 Pages, 300 GB of Dirt, Zero Transparency: FBI’s Million-Dollar Cover-Up of Epstein’s Black Book in Overdrive

The bill requiring the Department of Justice to release the long-awaited Jeffrey Epstein files has officially been signed into law — but that doesn’t mean the public will see everything. Behind the scenes, the FBI has poured enormous time and money into redacting material from Epstein-related evidence before any documents become public.

According to a Bloomberg report, the bureau has spent nearly $1 million in overtime pay as part of what officials internally call the “Epstein Transparency Project,” also referred to as the “Special Redaction Project.” At a secure FBI facility in Winchester, Virginia, nearly 1,000 agents have been assigned to the monumental task of combing through evidence tied to Epstein’s criminal network, his death in 2019, and his vast trove of digital files.

Records show that between March 17 and March 22 alone, the FBI racked up $851,344 in costs, and between January and July, agents logged a staggering 4,737 overtime hours on the “transparency” project. And their work is far from over.

A Massive Trove of Evidence

The DOJ still holds:

• Nearly 100,000 pages of unreleased documents
• 40 computers and electronic devices
• 26 storage drives
• 70+ CDs
• 6 recording devices
• Over 300 GB of digital data

Investigators are also reviewing a wide range of physical evidence, including:

• Travel logs and visitor lists to Epstein’s private island
• Blueprints of Epstein’s New York and Caribbean properties
• Thousands of dollars in cash
• Four busts of female body parts
• Five massage tables
• A list labeled simply as a “document with names,” believed by many to be the elusive client list

Internal reports indicate that FBI Director Kash Patel — along with Attorney General Pam Bondi — has directed agents to flag every reference to Donald Trump in the evidence. The President’s ties to Epstein have long been a subject of scrutiny, and those directives are fueling suspicion about the true motives behind the slow, heavily redacted release process.

Trump and his allies in Congress fought aggressively to delay the release of the files, insisting that redactions are necessary to protect victims and uninvolved parties. But critics say the prolonged secrecy instead serves to protect powerful individuals who may appear in the evidence.

The stalemate broke only after Rep. Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ) was sworn into Congress last month — providing the final vote needed to force the files’ release.

Despite the law’s mandate, large portions of the Epstein archive may still remain hidden permanently. For now, the public waits — while federal agents work overtime to decide which truths remain concealed.

Congress Forces Release of Epstein Files After Trump U-Turn

In a stunning and nearly unanimous move, both the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate voted this week to force the Department of Justice to release the long-sealed Jeffrey Epstein case files—ending months of political pressure, activist lobbying, and dramatic reversals from President Donald Trump himself.

The Epstein Files Transparency Act passed the House 427–1, then cleared the Senate without a single objection, fast-tracked through the chamber in a matter of hours. The bill now heads to President Trump, who—after long opposing the release and calling the matter a “Democrat hoax”—has signaled he will sign it into law.

Once signed, the Justice Department will have 30 days to release the full collection of investigative files related to Epstein and his co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell. Survivors and advocates have spent weeks calling this moment a historic breakthrough—though many observers warn that the final result may still fall short of full transparency.

For years, Trump had urged Republicans to avoid pushing for the release of Epstein documents, claiming Democrats were weaponizing the issue for political reasons. That changed abruptly this week, when Trump reversed course and declared that Republicans should support the bill.

He has since vowed to investigate the Democratic power players most associated with Epstein, including Bill Clinton, Larry Summers, Reid Hoffman, and executives connected to major financial institutions.

Notably, however, Trump has not publicly committed to probing Republicans who have been tied to Epstein socially or professionally.

Even with the bill set to become law, some legal experts and survivor advocates are raising a difficult possibility:

After years of stonewalling, legal shielding, and sealed evidence, key information may already be gone.

Under the bill:

The Attorney General may still withhold documents if releasing them would expose minors or jeopardize ongoing investigations.

Congress did not have to force this vote—Trump could have ordered full disclosure at any time.

The DOJ has already had five years since Epstein’s death to process, redact, or classify materials.

Rep. Thomas Massie, the Republican who helped lead the transparency push, warned that elite influence must not shape what the public ultimately sees.

“I hope those victims have confidence to come out and say the names,” he told BBC Newsnight, adding that lawmakers should not “create any special exemptions for these rich men who are worried about getting embarrassed.”

Survivors have echoed the same sentiment, telling lawmakers that anything less than full accountability would be “another betrayal.”

House Committee Uncovers Staggering Autopen Impropriety in Biden’s final days, wants to Invalidate Pardons to Fauci, Milley, Others

The US Department of Justice is being asked to review every single executive action taken by the Biden administration following a months-long inquiry by top investigators in the US House of Representatives.

A lengthy report released Tuesday by the House Oversight Committee — led by Republican Chairman James Comer — describes the deeply ‘flawed process’, akin to a ‘presidential pardon game of telephone’ used in the Biden White House.

Among the most controversial measures taken via autopen by the former president were the pardons of Dr. Anthony Fauci, General Mark Milley, and members of Congress who served on the January 6th committee. Biden also pardoned members of his family – James B. Biden, Sara Jones Biden, Valerie Biden Owens, John T. Owens, and Francis W. Biden – on his last full day in office.

The House Committee, led by Comer, is effectively asking the Department of Justice to invalidate Biden’s actions, including some of his most controversial pardons – a move that would be without precedent. . . 

Joe Biden’s only hand-signed pardon during his final months in office was also his most controversial – his son, Hunter. (Read more from “House Committee Uncovers Staggering Autopen Impropriety in Biden’s final days, wants to Invalidate Pardons to Fauci, Milley, Others” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

DOJ’s Rumored Trans Gun Ban Does Nothing But Play Right Into Democrats’ Hands

The Department of Justice is entertaining a bad idea in the form of an alleged ban on gender-confused Americans buying guns, according to new reporting from The Daily Wire.

“Individuals within the DOJ are reviewing ways to ensure that mentally ill individuals suffering from gender dysphoria are unable to obtain firearms while they are unstable and unwell,” a DOJ source reportedly told DW senior reporter Mary Margaret Olohan.

A blanket “trans” gun ban is a dicey, not to mention unnecessary, move. Taking away firearms never has and never will remedy the evil that possesses someone to shoot up a school, church, or other public place. It certainly won’t course-correct the culture or medical establishments that routinely feed people’s gender delusions.

In fact, all it does is play into the hands of prayer scoffers who dominate the blue party. The anonymous DOJ source quoted in the article acknowledged that fact by reportedly claiming “Democrats have called for common sense gun laws for a long time.”

“This seems pretty common sense to me,” the source allegedly added. (Read more from “DOJ’s Rumored Trans Gun Ban Does Nothing But Play Right Into Democrats’ Hands” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

Raskin: Ghislaine Maxwell Prison Interview Is a ‘Whitewash and a Cover-Up’

Representative Jamie Raskin (D-MD) sharply criticized a newly released Department of Justice interview with convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, calling it an “absolute whitewash and a cover-up.”

Speaking on MSNBC’s All In Friday evening, Raskin said Maxwell’s remarks contradicted the facts established at her trial and dismissed the experiences of victims. “It’s really an astonishing performance because contrary to everything that was found at trial and everything we know, Ghislaine Maxwell basically accused the underage victims of lying,” Raskin said.

The Maryland congressman noted that Maxwell denied witnessing any inappropriate sexual contact between Jeffrey Epstein and underage girls, and even went out of her way to defend former President Donald Trump. According to Raskin, Maxwell “gave a clean bill of health to President Trump, which is what that was all about, and complimented his rise to power.”

MSNBC host Chris Hayes also raised questions about the transparency of the transcript, pointing out that there were reports of an off-the-record portion of the discussion between Maxwell and her lawyer, Todd Blanche. “I want to say we don’t know if it’s complete,” Hayes said, adding that it was unclear whether the transcript reflected the full scope of Maxwell’s comments.

The interview emerged alongside the release of the first batch of 33,000 documents related to the case, which have been provided to the House Oversight Committee. Raskin said the materials would need to be reviewed carefully, but he urged the public to view Maxwell’s comments with skepticism.

“So, you know, I think people can see this for what it is,” Raskin said. “It’s an absolute whitewash and a cover-up.”

The interview and accompanying documents mark the latest chapter in the ongoing scrutiny of Epstein’s network, raising fresh questions about what information remains sealed and how much the public will ultimately learn.

Docs: Fired DOJ Official Sought to ‘Sway’ Trump Admin’s Handling of Venezuelan Deportation Case

Aformer Justice Department official and outspoken critic of Trump judicial nominee Emil Bove advised his colleagues on how to “sway” the Trump administration’s litigation strategy in a case involving the deportation of Venezuelan gang members in a way he found to be personally favorable, The Federalist has learned.

The revelation came to fruition in new documents obtained by The Federalist that shine a light on Erez Reuveni’s conduct in a case (J.G.G. v. Trump) over President Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport Tren de Aragua gang members. Reuveni served as acting deputy director for the Office of Immigration Litigation until early April, when he was suspended and subsequently fired for failing to “zealously advocate on behalf of the United States,” according to Attorney General Pam Bondi.

While Reuveni’s dismissal came after his reportedly improper handling of the DOJ’s deportation of Salvadoran national Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the new records acquired by The Federalist document his willingness to advance his own preferred litigation strategy over that of DOJ leadership.

The matter in question first kicked up on March 15, when Obama-appointed District Judge James Boasberg issued a temporary restraining order attempting to bar the Trump administration from deporting the group of illegal aliens under the AEA. As The Federalist’s Margot Cleveland reported, by the time Boasberg issued a written order that day enjoining the administration from deporting the group of Venezuelans covered under the president’s directive, “the Trump Administration had already removed two planes filled with illegal aliens from the United States.”

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt later argued the foreign gang members “had already been removed from U.S. territory” by the time of Boasberg’s edict, and that “the written order and the administration’s actions do not conflict.” (Read more from “Docs: Fired DOJ Official Sought to ‘Sway’ Trump Admin’s Handling of Venezuelan Deportation Case” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

Key Senator: Trump’s DOJ, FBI Slow-Walking Assassination Attempt Investigations

One year after a gunman came within a fraction of an inch of assassinating the 45th president of the United States, the American public remains in the dark on one of the darkest chapters in U.S. history. The senator leading the investigation into the bizarre sequence of events surrounding the murder plot in Butler, Penn., said his committee is “not an inch closer” to knowing why killer and would-be assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks did what he did.

“We had earlier reports about the geolocation of his cellphone, bopping all over Washington, D.C. We have not gotten any more information. Again, it’s incredibly frustrating,” Sen. Ron Johnson told me Friday in an interview on the Dan O’Donnell Show on NewsTalk 1130 WISN in Milwaukee.

The Wisconsin Republican, who leads the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, issued a subpoena on Friday to Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel for records relating to the July 13, 2024 assassination attempt of then-GOP presumptive presidential nominee Donald Trump. Johnson calls it a “friendly, not an adversarial subpoena,” but it’s clear, the FBI has not been forthcoming with the subcommittee’s many requests for information.

Trump’s Federal Bureau of Investigation, it seems, has been no better than Biden’s FBI, in cooperating with congressional investigators.

“Things just slowed down after our initial report. We were not getting access to [U.S.] Secret Service personnel,” Johnson said. “When President Trump won, I think my assumption was that his FBI, his Department of Justice, would certainly hop on this, investigate it, and produce the result. That hasn’t happened.” (Read more from “Key Senator: Trump’s DOJ, FBI Slow-Walking Assassination Attempt Investigations” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr