Posts

Postal Union Issues Trump Letter: ‘Existential Threat’

As we approach the November election, a letter from the National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC) has raised eyebrows. The letter warns that if former President Donald Trump wins, it could pose an “existential threat” to the union and its members. Signed by Georgia NALC President Don Griggs, this communication urges members to think carefully about their voting choices, suggesting that the consequences could significantly impact their jobs and the union’s future.

The letter specifically criticizes Trump’s agenda, particularly Project 2025, despite him having no involvement, painting it as a threat to organized labor. It claims that if Trump were to take office again, he would appoint allies opposed to union interests throughout the executive branch.

Among the assertions made are proposals that could fundamentally change the labor landscape: banning public employee unions, replacing private-sector unions with company-controlled alternatives, and allowing states to bypass federal overtime and minimum wage standards. It even mentions the potential repeal of the Davis-Bacon Act, which sets wage requirements on federal projects.

However, the situation became more complicated when Griggs later clarified that he did not authorize the letter, stating it was sent out by the AFL-CIO without his permission. He expressed surprise at its contents, indicating that he would have preferred the national union to communicate directly with its members rather than through state-level channels.

The NALC’s endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris further highlights the ongoing alignment between labor organizations and Democratic candidates. This move has left many conservatives questioning the priorities of unions that traditionally stood for workers’ rights.

As the election nears, it’s vital for all voters, including union members, to consider the implications of their choices. While the NALC’s letter expresses fear over a Trump presidency, supporters of Trump see an opportunity for pro-business policies that would benefit workers and the economy at large.

How the FBI Is Willing to Risk Your Safety to Get Kamala Elected

Shortly after the two ABC moderators entered the presidential debate on the side of Kamala Harris, there was a brief moment when Donald Trump pushed back. It happened when David Muir finished one of his drive-by “fact-checks,” concerning the crime rate in this country. The moderator intended to immediately ask Kamala Harris a question, so that Trump couldn’t respond. But Trump did respond, and the moderator had no answer to what he said. Watch:

If you’re going to debate a candidate, when you’re really supposed to be the moderator, then you should at least be able to debate. But Muir had no answer when Trump refuted his canned talking point about FBI data. He sheepishly had to pivot to Kamala, who started laughing awkwardly. . .

This summer, when the FBI released its Quarterly Uniform Crime Report showing that crime was down, they didn’t include data from New York or Los Angeles. The NYPD and LAPD are the two biggest police forces in the entire country, but they didn’t report their data at all, apparently because they couldn’t comply with the FBI’s new data-tracking requirements in time. And that wasn’t particularly unusual. Back in 2022, roughly one-third of the country’s 6,000 police agencies didn’t report crime data to the FBI. This isn’t some partisan point I’m making. The FBI admitted all of this.

Yesterday, though, the FBI released its latest updated annual report. And the agency claims that this time around, the report comprehensively documents violent crimes that occurred in 2023 because the data comes from law enforcement agencies that cover more than 95% of the country’s population — including the NYPD and LAPD. According to the new data, car thefts went up by around 20% from 2022 to 2023. So that’s a massive increase. But violent crime was supposedly down overall by 3%, while “murder and non-negligent homicide” were down more than 10%. Reported rapes were down nearly 10% as well, and property crimes dropped 2.5%. (Read more from “How the FBI Is Willing to Risk Your Safety to Get Kamala Elected” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Another Defendant Faces Charges for Allegedly Threatening President Trump’s Life

There’s been another alleged threat against the life of President Donald Trump, who has survived two apparent assassination schemes in just the last few weeks, and a spokesman for his campaign blames it directly on the “violent rhetoric” of Kamala Harris and other extremist Democrats.

A report in the Daily Mail explains Warren Jones Crazybull, 64, of Sandpoint, Idaho, allegedly made at least nine calls to Trump’s Florida residence, saying he was going to kill Trump.

The calls came July 31, just weeks after Trump was shot and injured in the ear in an assassination attempt during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.

“In one call, according to a criminal complaint and affidavit first reported on Monday, Crazybull threatened to ‘find Trump’ and said he was ‘coming down to Bedminster tomorrow,’ which is the town where Trump National Golf Club is located in New Jersey,” the report said. . . .

In fact, Joe Biden, Harris, and a long list of other extremists in the Democrat party have for several years described Trump as a “Hitler.” They’ve insisted he would be a dictator if he ever returned to office. They make wild claims that he would destroy “democracy” if elected. Such rhetoric is widely considered to be one of the reasons for the sudden spate of threats against and attacks on Trump. (Read more from “Another Defendant Faces Charges for Allegedly Threatening President Trump’s Life” HERE)

One Republican State Senator Paves Way for Trump to Possibly Lose by Single Electoral Vote

A single Republican state senator has opened up a potential nightmare scenario for former President Donald Trump.

Republican Nebraska State Sen. Mike McDonnell announced Monday that he opposes changing the state’s current system, where presidential candidates are awarded one electoral vote for each congressional district they win, plus two votes for whoever wins the whole state, to a winner-take-all allocation. McDonnell’s refusal to back the change would allow Vice President Kamala Harris to lose every Sub Belt swing state and still defeat Trump 270 to 268 if she pulls off victories in the Rust Belt and Nebraska’s 2nd Congressional District.

Without McDonnell’s support, Nebraska Republicans have no path to overcome a filibuster blocking the change to how electoral votes are allocated, according to the Nebraska Examiner.

In the event that Trump and Harris each receive 269 electoral votes in November, the House delegations for each state would vote for their preferred candidate and the candidate with the most states backing them takes the White House — a process that would favor Trump as 26 states currently have majority-Republican delegations, according to CNN.

Every other state in the union, with the exception of Maine, awards electoral votes on a winner-takes-all basis. President Joe Biden won Nebraska’s 2nd Congressional District in 2020, however, Trump won it in 2016. (Read more from “One Republican State Senator Paves Way for Trump to Possibly Lose by Single Electoral Vote” HERE)

‘Finish the Job’: DOJ Publishes Bounty Offer From Latest Would-Be Trump Assassin; Bill Barr Blasts DOJ for Releasing Letter: ‘Dumbfounded’

By The Federalist. Prosecutors for the U.S. Department of Justice released a letter, allegedly penned by the man arrested for attempting to assassinate former President Donald Trump as he golfed in West Palm Beach last week, which offers a $150,000 reward to anyone who could “complete the job” of murdering the Republican candidate.

“This was an assassination attempt on Donald Trump but I am so sorry I failed you,” the letter addressed to the “World” reads. “I tried my best and gave it all the gumption I could muster. It is up to you now to finish the job; and I will offer $150,000 to whomever can complete the job.”

The alleged author of the letter, Ryan Routh, attributed Democrat and corporate media rhetoric painting Trump as “unfit to be anything, much less a US president,” as motivation for his crime. He also blamed Trump’s decision to cut ties with Iran as the primary reason the “Middle East has unraveled.” . . .

According to court papers, Routh dropped off the letter in a package with an unnamed person “several months prior” to the golf course assassination attempt. It wasn’t until days after Routh’s arrest, however, that the “civilian witness” reportedly first opened the box containing “ammunition, a metal pipe, miscellaneous building materials, tools, four phones, and various letters” and alerted authorities.

The circumstances surrounding the letter’s appearance raise many questions. The content of the letter, however, makes clear that the would-be assassin’s ultimate goal in hiding in the bushes at Trump International Golf Course on September 15 was to permanently remove Trump from the planet by whatever means necessary. (Read more from “‘Finish the Job’: DOJ Publishes Bounty Offer From Latest Would-Be Trump Assassin” HERE)

________________________________________________________________

Bill Barr Blasts DOJ for Releasing Letter of Alleged Would-Be Trump Assassin Ryan Wesley Routh: ‘Dumbfounded’

By New York Post. Former US Attorney General William Barr panned the Justice Department he once ran for publicly disclosing a chilling letter from the man who allegedly attempted to assassinate former President Donald Trump earlier this month.

In a court filing Monday, prosecutors released the disturbing note they claim was authored by suspect Ryan Wesley Routh, 58, as proof of his intention to kill the 45th president.

“I was dumbfounded that the DOJ made public this morning the contents of the letter that, Ryan Routh, left with an acquaintance prior to the attempted assassination of former President Trump,” Barr told Fox News.

Prosecutors claimed to have acquired that note — addressed “To the World” — from an unnamed source who found it in a box they said was delivered to them by Routh prior to the shooting last week.

“The letter calls on people to ‘finish the job’ of killing President Trump, attempts to rouse people in incendiary terms to do so, and offers $150,000 to anyone who succeeds. There was no apparent justification for releasing this information at this stage,” Barr went on. (Read more from “Bill Barr Blasts DOJ for Releasing Letter of Alleged Would-Be Trump Assassin Ryan Wesley Routh: ‘Dumbfounded’” HERE)

Trump Fights Jack Smith Efforts to ‘Litter’ Jan. 6 Case With Evidence Dump

Donald Trump‘s attorneys said on Monday that they oppose Jack Smith’s request to submit a massive filing to the court that would contain evidence supporting the special counsel’s election interference charges against the former president.

Trump’s attorneys asked Judge Tanya Chutkan to deny the request after Smith asked the court over the weekend if he could file a 180-page document justifying Trump’s charges in the wake of the Supreme Court‘s presidential immunity ruling.

“Allowing the Special Counsel’s Office to litter the docket sheet with an unnecessary tome would be inconsistent with the fact that there are dispositive threshold legal questions identified in Trump v. United States that can and should be resolved first,” Trump’s attorneys wrote.

The Supreme Court found in July that presidents enjoy some immunity from criminal prosecution. The high court also ordered Chutkan to decide what conduct in Smith’s indictment was immunized and therefore unable to be used against Trump in light of the justices’ newly established definition of presidential immunity.

Prosecutors for Smith told Chutkan they wanted to submit the mammoth filing, which would be roughly four times the size of a typical court motion, to create a “robust record” of why their indictment should pass the Supreme Court’s immunity test. (Read more from “Trump Fights Jack Smith Efforts to ‘Litter’ Jan. 6 Case With Evidence Dump” HERE)

Alan Dershowitz Says Feds May Not Be Able to Prosecute Would-Be Trump Assassin for Attempted Assassination

Alan Dershowitz expressed doubt on Monday that federal prosecutors could make a case for attempted murder against the man accused of trying to assassinate former President Donald Trump on Sept. 15.

Secret Service agents thwarted the apparent assassination attempt on Trump by firing shots at Ryan Wesley Routh, who was allegedly lurking near Trump International Golf Club, two months after Trump was shot in the right ear while giving a speech at a July campaign rally in Pennsylvania. Dershowitz said that despite Routh’s intent to kill Trump, it was not clear that all of the legal elements for attempted murder were present.

“Based on my experience, I don’t think they have a case for attempted assassination,” Dershowitz said. “Let me explain why, this is gonna sound so counterintuitive. The guy obviously wanted to kill the president and he took actions to kill the president. Now here… you’re getting a free Harvard criminal law class.”

“If he conspired with somebody else to do, it would be an open and shut case, because for conspiracy all you need is an agreement to kill the president or to try to kill the president, and he did certainly agree with himself, he certainly made up his mind,” Dershowitz continued. “We have the evidence, the letter, he wrote a letter… saying ‘I wanted to kill the president, I tried to kill the president, I failed, I’m giving $150,000 to anybody else who succeeds.’ So, if it were conspiracy, it would be a clear case, conspiracy to assassinate the president, open and shut. Why isn’t it an open and shut case for attempt?” . . .

“He never had the president in his line of fire, and of course he never pulled the trigger,” Dershowitz said, referring to Routh. “So the question as the court will have to address, the question without a clear answer, is whether or not preparing, putting your gun in a location, putting it through the link fence, but not getting the president in the line of sight and not pulling the trigger is enough to turn it from preparation to attempt, and the law is just unclear on that.” (Read more from “Alan Dershowitz Says Feds May Not Be Able to Prosecute Would-Be Trump Assassin for Attempted Assassination” HERE)

Donald Trump ‘Chemical Attack’ Assassination Attempt Fears Explode — As Expert Warns Rally Goers May Have Been Hit with Toxic Blast

Death-dodging Donald Trump is at the center of fears he may have been targeted in a chemical attack assassination attempt, RadarOnline.com can reveal.

The ex-US president, 78, saw a string of his MAGA supporters hospitalized with burning eyes and temporary blindness after his recent rally in Tucson, Arizona – and experts now say their injuries may have been the result of being blasted with toxic gas.

They were rushed for emergency treatment on September 12, with “victims” reporting eye swelling and light sensitivity – with one saying her eyeballs were “burning”. . .

Mentions of the toxins has sparked a flood of theories online the Tucson rally may have been the target of another assassination attempt on Trump.

A source said: “These hospitalizations are really mysterious, and theories are erupting all over the web on how they could have been caused by a possible chemical attack, or test for one, on Trump. (Read more from “Donald Trump ‘Chemical Attack’ Assassination Attempt Fears Explode — As Expert Warns Rally Goers May Have Been Hit with Toxic Blast” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

How Democrats Are Grooming Assassins to Take out Trump

There have been many calls for lowering the temperature between the first assassination attempt against Donald Trump on July 13, 2024, and the second on Sept. 15, 2024. Yet only two hours after last week’s attempt on Trump in Florida, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries lambasted “extreme MAGA Republicans,” saying “We must stop them,” leaving listeners to guess to whom he referred and how “they” should be stopped.

It’s part of a constant pattern since Trump emerged on the political scene, starting with assassination fantasies with “the resistance,” continuing through the Russian collusion hoax, and aided by protective agencies’ refusal to secure conservative figures.

It’s not just the typically aggressive political rhetoric. Leftists have openly engaged in direct assassination fantasies for years. A conspicuous movement to dehumanize one particular person in America has continuously expanded since early 2016, when “the resistance” formed. Madonna infamously proclaimed, “I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House,” signaling the cultural zeitgeist controllers would wage a no-holds-barred siege against Trump.

Kathy Griffin followed in kind, publicizing an image of herself holding Trump’s dripping severed head. Shortly afterward, nightly showings of Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar in New York’s Central Park were capped by the assassination of an unmistakably Trumpian Caesar. Feelers for assassination were going out.

As of 2017, “the resistance” could claim, consequence-free, that Trump deserved anything he got, up to and including murder. The cultural left intended to not only marginalize Trump, but also to fully demonize and dehumanize him. The race was on to define Trump as the most dangerously destructive person in America. The sheer scale of the propaganda no doubt seized the imaginations of many with dreams of fame and glory. The seeds of assassination were thus widely sown. (Read more from “How Democrats Are Grooming Assassins to Take out Trump” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Zelenskyy Flown Into Key Swing State at Taxpayer Expense After Attacking Trump, Vance

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy flew into a key U.S. swing state this week on a taxpayer-funded aircraft after publicly criticizing former President Donald Trump and Republican Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance.

Zelenskyy touched down in Scranton, Pennsylvania, on Sunday in a U.S. Air Force C-17A aircraft and toured a local munitions factory that has been producing armaments for Ukraine amid the country’s ongoing war against Russia. During his visit, Zelenskyy met with high-level Democratic Pennsylvania officials such as Gov. Josh Shapiro, Sen. Bob Casey and Rep. Matt Cartwright and expressed his gratitude “for their support.”

“Trump makes political statements in his election campaign. He says he wants the war to stop. Well, we do, too…. My feeling is that Trump doesn’t really know how to stop the war even if he might think he knows how,” Zelenskyy told The New Yorker in the interview published Sunday, noting that he was appreciative that Trump has expressed his support. “With this war, oftentimes, the deeper you look at it the less you understand. I’ve seen many leaders who were convinced they knew how to end it tomorrow, and as they waded deeper into it, they realized it’s not that simple.”

Zelenskyy was even more critical of Vance to The New Yorker, referring to him as “too radical.” In an interview with the Shawn Ryan show in mid-September, Vance recently proposed a peace deal where Russia retains the territory it has seized so that a demilitarized zone could be established along the current battle lines. . .

“This would be an awful idea, if a person were actually going to carry it out,” Zelenskyy told The New Yorker. “But there’s certainly no way this could ever happen… And it wouldn’t necessarily end the war, either. It’s just sloganeering.” (Read more from “Zelenskyy Flown Into Key Swing State at Taxpayer Expense After Attacking Trump, Vance” HERE)