A new wave of documents and images from the Justice Department’s ongoing Epstein file release is shining a disturbing light into the late financier’s Manhattan townhouse — and sparking outrage after tech users uncovered that many of the government’s redactions can be bypassed with basic software tools.

The photos, taken inside Epstein’s sprawling Upper East Side mansion, reveal a trove of unsettling décor and role-play outfits, including childlike costumes, eerie taxidermy, and multiple pieces of artwork depicting children in inappropriate or compromising poses. One sculpture shows a ghostly bride figure gripping a rope in the home’s entryway. In another image, a framed picture of a young boy peering down his pants hangs on the wall.

Across the townhouse, more framed prints of children — along with bizarre props and staged costumes — add to what critics are calling a “window into Epstein’s twisted aesthetic.” The images were released as part of the DOJ’s compliance with a congressional deadline requiring the agency to turn over Epstein-related records.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the decision to publish only a portion of the files ahead of the deadline, arguing that certain materials must remain shielded to protect survivors and private information. But the department is now facing a new controversy — because some of the very redactions meant to obscure names and details can apparently be removed with a simple copy-and-paste.

Tech-savvy users online demonstrated that portions blacked out in Adobe Acrobat reappear when pasted into programs like Google Docs or Microsoft Word. The glitch quickly went viral, fueling accusations of government incompetence and raising questions about whether sensitive content has now been unintentionally exposed. The authenticity of those unmasked sections, however, has not been independently verified.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Joe Miller (@joemilleralaska)

The broader document dump has already produced a wave of explosive — and in some cases never-before-seen — photographs of Epstein with powerful political figures and celebrities. Among them are images of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, Mick Jagger, Michael Jackson, and a shirtless Bill Clinton relaxing in a hot tub with an unidentified woman. Other photos show Clinton alongside Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell during travels abroad.

The files also include a newly publicized prosecutor email alleging that President Donald Trump flew on Epstein’s jet more frequently in the 1990s than previously reported — including several flights where Maxwell was also on board. The email does not accuse Trump of any crime, and the Justice Department has emphasized that some of the allegations in the records are “untrue and sensationalized,” stating that if any credible wrongdoing existed, it would have already surfaced. [via Reuters:]

In an email dated January 7, 2020, the unidentified prosecutor wrote that flight records showed Trump had flown on Epstein’s private jet eight times during the 1990s. Among those were at least four flights on which Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell was also aboard. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence for helping late financier Epstein sexually abuse underage girls.

In a social media post in 2024, Trump said he “was never on Epstein’s Plane, or at his ‘stupid’ Island.” There was no allegation in the prosecutor’s email that Trump had committed any crime. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the email.

On one flight described in the newly released records, the only three passengers were Epstein, Trump and a 20-year-old woman whose name was redacted. “On two other flights, two of the passengers, respectively, were women who would be possible witnesses in a Maxwell case,” the document stated.

Epstein’s world — and the powerful orbit around him — continues to ignite public anger and suspicion as each new batch of files drops. And with the DOJ promising more releases in the coming weeks, pressure is mounting for full transparency — along with renewed scrutiny over how such sensitive records are being handled.