. . .But Democrats, many of whom still are unable to accept that he was elected over their nominee, the scandal-plagued Hillary Clinton, are quietly planning to remove him from office.

A recent move in Congress indicates they will push for impeachment if they win a majority in Congress in 2018.

U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., is replacing disgraced Democrat John Conyers on the House Judiciary Committee.

Nadler boasts experience as a ranking member on the panel’s Constitution committee and the courts subcommittee and was praised by Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., as someone who will “handle it” if “the president messes around with the Constitution.” . . .

Signs of the Democrats’ strategy are already emerging. As former assistant U.S. attorney Andrew McCarthy noted at National Review, Robert Mueller’s ever-expanding investigation into Trump has failed to find any evidence of collusion, and that phase of the investigation is “over.” (Read more from “Democrats’ Real Plan to Impeach Trump in 2019” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Last year, following Donald Trump’s historic and unexpected election to the presidency, I put together a conservative Christmas 2017 policy wish-list. With full control of Congress and the White House, Republicans were in a unique position to implement the conservative agenda following the disastrous presidency of Barack Obama.

One year later, President Trump and the Republicans can claim several promises fulfilled, but too many are left unfinished. The Republicans still have one year to deliver on their campaign promises before the 2018 midterm elections. Failure to do so may sweep them out of power.

Which promises were kept? Which are still waiting? Let’s review.

Full repeal of Obamacare

Though Republicans considered several versions of health care reform legislation, they never attempted to pass a true full repeal of Obamacare. The core elements of Obamacare have become enshrined by the Republican Congress. The regulations, spending, mandates, and cost-sharing subsidies have become an untouchable third rail in American politics, as Obamacare has gone the way of other entitlement programs.

For now, the only meaningful action Republicans have taken to even partially repeal Obamacare is the inclusion of a provision to reduce the individual mandate penalty to zero, essentially eliminating the individual mandate.

Though Americans will no longer be forced to buy insurance plans they cannot afford, premiums are still set to increase, insurance markets still face a death spiral, and insurance companies continue to demand bailouts from the federal government as they are crushed by the weight of the Obamacare system.

The promise to repeal Obamacare was not kept. Health care remains the most important domestic policy challenge facing this country, and the American people should demand that Congress take up true health care reform immediately.

Border security and the wall

Though the federal government has built several prototypes for a border wall during the Trump administration, actual construction on the oft-promised wall has not begun. The White House Office of Management and Budget recently told the Department of Homeland Security to adjust its projected spending for the 2019 fiscal year to $1.6 billion to fund construction of the wall.

This funding needs to come from Congress. There is a Dec. 22 deadline for the legislature to agree on a spending bill for the next year, and the status of funding for the wall remains in question. President Trump has previously suggested that a government shutdown may be necessary if Democrats refuse to vote for a spending bill that includes wall funding, though Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has repeatedly insisted that a shutdown is out of the question.

Congress has failed to pass funding for the wall. President Trump must draw a red line in the spending bill and be willing to fulfill his pledge to shut down the government, if necessary, to build that wall.

Government lobbying ban

On the campaign trail, President Trump promised to help “drain the Swamp” by issuing an executive order to create a five-year lobbying ban for former administration officials after they leave the White House or Congress. Trump also pledged to create a lifetime ban on White House officials lobbying on behalf of foreign governments.

In one of his first acts as president last January, President Trump signed an executive order putting these lobbying bans into effect. This promise was kept.

Repeal Dodd-Frank

The House of Representatives voted to repeal the “Obamacare of financial markets” with a party-line vote back in June. Besides creating a massive and costly regulatory regime, Dodd-Frank created the unconstitutional Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and is estimated to have a $1 trillion negative impact on the American economy.

The U.S. Senate killed the House bill. A new bipartisan agreement to roll back some aspects of Dodd-Frank was introduced, but this compromise legislation keeps many regulations and only partially repeals the unconstitutional CFPB. President Trump stands ready to sign repeal legislation … if only Congress would send him a bill. So far, they haven’t.

Nominate a pro-life justice to the Supreme Court

President Trump’s appointment of Justice Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court received nearly universal acclaim from conservatives. Gorsuch is pro-life, and this promise was kept.

Pain-capable abortion ban

The federal ban on abortions after 20 weeks of gestation has passed the House of Representatives. Mitch McConnell claims the bill is supported by “virtually all” Republicans in the Senate, but he has not yet announced a date for the vote.

President Trump has formally backed this legislation, but the promise is not kept until he signs the bill.

Defund Planned Parenthood and make the Hyde Amendment permanent

Language to defund Planned Parenthood for one year was included in some versions of Obamacare partial repeal, but since those bills failed, there has been no congressional action on defunding Planned Parenthood. As Congress considers legislation to bail out health insurance companies, the Susan B. Anthony List, a pro-life group, has warned that it would oppose any effort that includes Obamacare insurer payments that aren’t protected by the Hyde Amendment. The amendment is a spending requirement that prevents federal funding from going toward abortions.

So far, Congress has refused to defund Planned Parenthood and permanently extend the Hyde Amendment.

First Amendment Defense Act

A federal version of laws designed to protect religious liberty by preventing the government from penalizing Americans for affirming that marriage is only the union between a man and a woman has been introduced by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, in the Senate and by Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Idaho, in the House.

The president supports this legislation. “If Congress considers the First Amendment Defense Act a priority, then I will do all I can to make sure it comes to my desk for signatures and enactment,” Trump wrote in a letter last year.

Congress hasn’t moved on it.

Fix the Fed

So far in this presidency, President Trump seems to be intent on keeping the status quo for the Federal Reserve. Trump recently nominated Jerome Powell to be the next chairman of the Fed when Janet Yellen’s term expires in February. Powell is an uncontroversial pick for the powerful institution that controls monetary policy in the United States — and thus has influence on global markets.

Conservatives and libertarians who subscribe to the Austrian school of economics believe that the Federal Reserve is largely responsible for artificially creating booms and busts via false market signals. The Fed’s control over interest rates is a powerful tool, and its misuse can have disastrous consequences such as inflation, which reduces the purchasing power of your dollars. At other times, the Fed artificially keeps the interest rate too low, which can cause serious inflationary consequences down the line.

Senator Rand Paul, R-Ky., has introduced legislation to audit the Fed to ensure accountability, but Trump’s nominee Powell has previously criticized this legislation, arguing that congressional policy audits are “misguided” and would submit the independent federal reserve to political pressure, which could exacerbate financial crises.

President Trump made a campaign promise to audit the Fed, and in 2015 he expressed a desire to abandon fiat currency and go back to a gold standard. Yet for the time being, the Trump administration is missing a great opportunity to make good on this campaign promise.

Tax reform

The Republicans in Congress have put together a tax reform plan that, while short of a fundamental restructuring of the American tax system, will give most Americans a solid tax cut and give American businesses a huge competitive edge. After several weeks of drama, the House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate passed the bill, and President Trump will sign tax reform into law before the year ends.

Even the Left is being forced to admit that 80 percent of Americans are getting a tax cut under the Republican plan and the average tax cut will be $1,600. The tax cuts kick in in February.

Scrap Obama’s unconstitutional executive orders (DACA to start)

In September, President Trump cancelled Obama’s illegal DACA order granting amnesty to illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children. In doing so, the president announced a six-month delay in the enforcement of his new policy to give Congress time to develop a legislative solution for so-called “Dreamers.”

Strictly speaking, the president kept his promise to repeal the unconstitutional executive order. But his championing of Congress to pass legal DACA amnesty betrays the spirit of his America First campaign by prioritizing the needs of illegal immigrants before Congress has acted to secure the border, build a wall, and tighten enforcement of our immigration laws so that America is benefited by the immigrants who come here.

Repeal the EPA “Waters of the United States” rule

President Trump promised to rescind the unbelievably tyrannical Obama-era regulation that put the federal government in control of the puddle in your back yard.

In June, the Environmental Protection Agency formally began the process of repealing the “waters of the United States” rule and replacing it with a more limited regulation. This promise was kept.

National Right to Carry

President Trump was a strong advocate for the Second Amendment on the campaign trail and remains so in office.

“A driver’s license works in every state, so it’s common sense that a concealed carry permit should work in every state. If we can do that for driving — which is a privilege, not a right — then surely we can do that for concealed carry, which is a right, not a privilege,” Trump said.

The House of Representatives recently passed “The Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act (H.R. 8),” but CR’s Daniel Horowitz was one of few to sound the alarm on hidden gun control legislation attached to the bill. Horowitz notes that there is no commitment from the U.S. Senate to pass the concealed carry reciprocity portion of the legislation, while Republican leaders are prioritizing the gun control bill.

Almost every Republican in Congress claims to be pro-gun rights, but their actions don’t agree.

The first year of Trump’s presidency is drawing to a close, and the Republicans in Congress have demonstrated there is still far too much work to do to pass a conservative agenda. At this rate, it will be a miracle if Congress can achieve these remaining goals by the end of Trump’s presidency, let alone by next Christmas. (For more from the author of “Conservative Christmas List: Which Wish-List Items Did Trump Accomplish?” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

A federal court in New York City has dismissed a lawsuit against President Donald Trump that alleged his failure to divest from the Trump business empire violated anti-corruption provisions of the Constitution.

U.S. District Judge George Daniels, a Clinton administration appointee, ruled Thursday that the case could not proceed because the plaintiffs could not prove that Trump’s actions tangibly harmed their businesses.

The lawsuit was brought by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, an anti-Trump watchdog group formerly led by Clinton ally David Brock.

A number of accomplished lawyers and legal scholars participated in the effort, including Professor Laurence Tribe of Harvard Law School, Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the law school at the University of California, Berkeley, and Richard Painter, an ethics lawyer in the George W. Bush White House.

The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the federal trial court in Manhattan.

The plaintiffs claim that their economic livelihood has been adversely affected by their inability to compete with Trump’s businesses following his election to the presidency.

The plaintiffs — event planners, hoteliers and restaurant owners — claim they have lost business in recent months, as prospective costumers flock to Trump properties to curry favor with the administration or secure greater exposure.

Daniels was not convinced, however, finding that the plaintiffs could not show that Trump’s actions hurt their business.

Daniels explained that interest in Trump properties would naturally attend his election to the presidency. Such an organic development in the market, he said, is not grounds for a lawsuit.

“(T)he connection between the hospitality plaintiffs alleged injuries and defendant’s actions is too tenuous to satisfy Article III’s causation requirement,” he wrote.

He also noted that nothing in the Constitution suggests its anti-corruption provisions are meant to protect people from fair economic competition.

“Nothing in the text or the history of the emoluments clauses suggests that the framers intended these provisions to protect anyone from competition,” he wrote.

On a separate note, Daniels wrote the Constitution explicitly cedes enforcement of the emoluments clause to Congress.

Therefore, it would only be appropriate for a court to hear an emoluments challenge if Congress first attempted to enforce the provision, and the president refused to comply.

“Congress is not a potted plant,” he wrote in a footnote. “It is a co-equal branch of the federal government with the power to act as a body in response to defendant’s alleged foreign emoluments clause violations, if it chooses to do so.”

Speaking after the ruling, CREW executive director Noah Bookbinder said the organization would review its options before proceeding with a potential appeal.

“While today’s ruling is a setback, we will not walk away from this serious and ongoing constitutional violation,” he said. “The Constitution is explicit on these issues, and the president is clearly in violation.” (For more from the author of “Clinton-Appointed Judge Throws out yet Another Anti-Trump Lawsuit” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.