Posts

Judge Overturns Military Ban on HIV-Positive Troops Getting Commissioned as Officers

A federal judge has struck down the military’s policy of denying commissions to HIV-positive service members in a lawsuit filed in 2018.

U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema ruled Wednesday that the Department of Defense must reconsider Nicholas Harrison’s application to become a JAG officer for the D.C. National Guard without taking into account his HIV-positive status. The ruling also applies to “any other asymptomatic HIV-positive service member with an undetectable viral load.” . . .

When asked about the judge’s Wednesday ruling, a spokesman for the Pentagon directed Military.com to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice did not reply before publication.

The allegation that the military’s HIV regulations, originally developed in the 1980s, are out of touch is not new.

At one point in the 1980s, service members who tested positive were being charged with sodomy under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and HIV-positive troops reported being forced to live in a special barracks at Fort Hood that became known as “the leper colony.” (Read more from “Judge Overturns Military Ban on HIV-Positive Troops Getting Commissioned as Officers” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.

Biden Plans Decriminalization of HIV Transmission

Former Vice President Joe Biden’s plan to “advance LGBTQ equality” includes a promise to decriminalize HIV exposure and transmission laws.

“In 2018, 26 states in America had HIV exposure criminal laws,” President-elect Biden’s plan reads under the subhead, “Decriminalize HIV exposure and transmission laws.”

“These laws perpetuate discrimination and stigma towards people with HIV/AIDS, and there is simply no ‘scientific basis’ for them,” the plan continues. “As President, Biden will support legislation like the REPEAL HIV Discrimination Act, which promotes best practice recommendations for states.”

The REPEAL HIV Discrimination Act directs the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Department of Defense (DOD) to conduct a review of laws, policies, regulations, and judicial precedents and decisions dealing with HIV and persons living with the virus.

The results of this review would be made public under this legislation and then the DOJ and HHS would create guidance and “an integrated monitoring and evaluation system to measure state progress.”

(Read more from “Biden Plans Decriminalization of HIV Transmission” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Disgusting Homosexual Site Lists ‘What You Stand to Lose’ by Avoiding Sex with People Who Have HIV

Last week, the LGBT website Queerty published an article that has since been going viral on social media, provocatively titled “What you stand to lose by not having sex with people with HIV.”

As the title suggests, the article by David Hudson intends to dispel a stigma attached to HIV-positive individuals (primarily gay men), arguing that people should be open to sexual relations with them. The article begins by envisioning an idyllic couple who complement each other in so many ways only to have that relationship cut short upon one discovering the other to be HIV-positive. . .

While David Hudson understands some of the concerns individuals might have about having sex with an HIV-positive individual and grants that “everyone has the right to take responsibility for their sexual health,” he nonetheless implores his readers to think about “the potential consequences of your particular decisions.”

“If someone is HIV positive, knows their status, is on effective medication and has consistently had an undetectable viral load, they cannot pass on the virus,” argues Hudson. “PrEP is also widely available in the US and several other countries to prevent people from acquiring HIV. And condoms are also, of course, widely available.”

“I know a couple of long-term serodiscordant couples,” he continues. “A serodiscordant relationship is one in which one partner is HIV positive and one is HIV negative.” (Read more from “Disgusting Homosexual Site Lists ‘What You Stand to Lose’ by Avoiding Sex with People Who Have HIV” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

WATCH: Some 2020 Democrats Think It Should Be Legal to Knowingly Give Someone HIV

Should it be a crime to knowingly expose someone to HIV without disclosing it?

Most sane people would say yes. But a widely panned Vox article published this week said that state laws making it a crime to not disclose your HIV status “have only increased stigma and abuse.” And apparently, many 2020 Democrats agree with this ludicrous, insane point of view.

This was a common theme at Thursday night’s CNN town hall focused on gay and transgender issues, sponsored by the Human Rights Campaign. Host Anderson Cooper, for example, called laws criminalizing HIV nondisclosure “antiquated” and based on “old science.” Presidential contender Pete Buttigieg agreed, saying, “It’s not fair and it needs to change.” And both on the CNN stage and in her new LGBT issues platform, Sen. Elizabeth Warren has endorsed decriminalizing HIV transmission as well.

Sen. Cory Booker has also signed on to this radicalism, explicitly agreeing that laws requiring disclosure of HIV status to sexual partners are “archaic” and have “no scientific basis,” calling for their complete repeal.

(Read more from “WATCH: Some 2020 Democrats Think It Should Be Legal to Knowingly Give Someone HIV” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

HIV Rising Amongst Homeless Population – Here’s Why

The Seattle Times reports that in clusters of heterosexual homeless men and women, HIV is rising due to the sharing of syringes and needles as the opioid crisis devastates the area. But, as the piece notes, Seattle is just one of many cities experiencing similar public health problems.

The Seattle Time’s Ryan Bethlen notes “Since January 2018, 17 people have contracted HIV in the cluster. The cases are connected to a strain of HIV that 26 people have been diagnosed with going back to 2008. Across King County, from 2017 to 2018, HIV diagnoses have risen threefold for heterosexuals who inject drugs.”

But this sort of disease is not limited to Seattle alone. Health experts told Bethlen that “the rapid increase of the infection rate is likely the coupling of a growing homeless population and the exploding opioid epidemic.” This has affected areas such as “Cincinnati, Scout County, Indiana, and in the Lowell and Lawrence areas of Massachusetts.”

Dr. Matthew Golden, director of Public Health’s HIV/STD program, said what Seattle has is “a growing population at risk.” Despite having a government-backed needle exchange program for drug users, “it wasn’t reaching people in this area and added to the virus.” (Read more from “HIV Rising Amongst Homeless Population – Here’s Why” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

California: It’s No Longer a Felony to Hide HIV When Donating Blood… Even If Goal Is to Infect Others

After the height of the AIDS epidemic in the late 1980s, California has held to laws making it a felony — and enforced by prison time — to knowingly infect another individual with HIV.

Thus, “it’s a felony for an HIV-positive person to have unprotected sex without informing their partner that they are infected. It is also a felony for HIV-positive people to donate blood, body organs or other tissue,” according to The Sacramento Bee.

However, that law, labeled as “irrational and discriminatory” by Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener of San Francisco, has been signed away by Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown. Instead, knowingly infecting someone with HIV is now a misdemeanor rather than a felony.

The new bill would instead “make the intentional transmission of an infectious or communicable disease, as defined, a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than 6 months,” according to the California legislature.

“Right now HIV is singled out for uniquely harsh treatment as a felony,” said Wiener.

“HIV is a public health problem, not a criminal justice problem, and it needs to be treated this way,” he said, according to Express Newsline, further adding that modern drugs can limit the exposure effects toward some, yet many remain discouraged from getting tested due to the threat of strict felony charges.

Wiener hopes the new bill might encourage people to get tested and, in turn, lower the HIV transmission rate throughout the state.

“These laws do not prevent HIV infections. All they do is stigmatize people living with HIV and reduce access to testing and care,” he said, according to the Los Angeles Times. He also noted that people who expose others with different viruses get only a misdemeanor as well.

But many are not taking kindly to the newly enacted bill.

“I’m of the mind that if you purposefully inflict another with a disease that alters their lifestyle the rest of their life, puts them on a regiment of medications to maintain any kind of normalcy, it should be a felony,” said Republican state Sen. Joel Anderson of San Diego.

“It’s absolutely crazy to me that we should go light on this,” he added, suggesting that tougher penalties should apply to those with other infectious diseases as well.

“When you intentionally put others at risk, you should have responsibility,” Anderson said, according to CNN.

Other Republicans like Sen. Jeff Stone, who is also a licensed pharmacist and pharmacy owner, agree.

Stone suggested that to purposefully infect another individual would “condemn one to probably $1 million in drug therapy for the rest of their lives.”

However, according to STAT News, the new bill would repeal the “mandated criminal penalties for donating blood, organs, semen, or breast milk despite being HIV-positive,” and many are praising the act in the name of equality.

“California’s outdated and draconian HIV criminal laws have disproportionately harmed people of color and transgender women,” said Melissa Goodman, the Gender and Reproductive Justice Project director with the ACLU of Southern California, Breitbart reported.

“With the enactment of this law, our laws will now become more fair, less discriminatory, and will promote treatment and prevention rather than criminalization,” she added.

A study done by the Williams Institute shows that “less than 13 percent of HIV-positive Californians” are women, but women account for “43 percent of criminal justice proceedings based on HIV-positive status.”

The study also suggested that African-Americans and Latinos were disproportionately affected, as they were subject to 67 percent of criminal proceedings, and made up 51 percent of the HIV-positive population in California.

However, reducing the punishment for those who violate another’s health could make them more vulnerable.

Just one — of the many — stories of intentional infection stems from 2015, when landscape architect Thomas Guerra was convicted of infecting others with HIV, and boasted about it. The evidence was found from 11,000 text messages and three dozen audio clips, according to Thought Catalog.

“Yay lol,” read one of the texts. “Someone getting poz that day. Poor Sucka.”

Katherine Lewis, The San Diego judge, who sentenced Guerra, had some choice words regarding the case.

“I think that’s a tremendous oversight in the law if this is just a misdemeanor,” said Lewis, who also called the light sentence a “travesty” while insisting the offense should be changed to a “felony.”

According to The Washington Post, Lewis “said she would have liked to have slapped Guerra with a stiffer sentence but was prevented from doing so by statutes.”

Another case was reported in 2011, when David Dean Smith attempted to “spread the disease to kill people,” Breitbart reported. He specifically targeted those “who are young. He hits young women…those are his targets,” one of his alleged female victims.

But the ACLU continues to defend this new bill, saying the old law was “based on fear and the limited medical understanding of the time,” even when there are others

Former Republican state Sen.Richard Rainey, who introduced a bill in the 1990s making it a crime to expose an unknowing partner to HIV or AIDS, told the Los Angeles Times in 2003 that he agrees with what he set out to do in protecting unsuspecting victims.

“The way I see it, these people are handing out potential death sentences,” he said. (For more from the author of “California: It’s No Longer a Felony to Hide HIV When Donating Blood… Even If Goal Is to Infect Others” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Almost 200 People in This Indiana Town Were Diagnosed With HIV

From the start of the HIV outbreak here, health officials emphasized that nothing set Scott County apart from many other rural communities where opioid drug use had become an epidemic . . .

Many people here had viewed HIV as a big-city disease, something that might afflict people in San Francisco or New York. But Austin is a small city of about 4,000 people 40 miles north of Louisville, Ky.

Then in February 2015, the first 30 cases of HIV were reported. By mid-March, the number had climbed to 55 . . .

Now, a year later, the outbreak is at 190 cases. But the sickness runs deeper.

Poverty envelops this city. Empty storefronts dot the main street. Many homes are boarded up or have makeshift tarps instead of windows. Fewer than 10% of Austin’s residents have earned a college degree. (Read more from “Almost 200 People in This Indiana Town Were Diagnosed With HIV” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Child Thought Cured of HIV Tests Positive for the Virus

Photo Credit: NIAIDThe Mississippi girl born with HIV who was believed to be cured after aggressive early treatment has tested positive for the virus, a disappointing setback for HIV/AIDS research.

The child, who had not been on anti-retroviral therapy for 27 months, was believed to be the first person to have the virus completely eliminated through drugs, and scientists had hoped to be able to replicate her regimen to treat other babies infected at birth.

“It felt very much like a punch to the gut,” Hannah Gay, a physician who treated the baby, said during a press conference Thursday.

The child, whose name has not been revealed, was at high risk for infection because her mother was HIV-positive and had not received any treatment during pregnancy. Doctors typically do not treat infants with the drugs until at least six weeks after birth when they can be certain the babies are infected. But in a highly unusual move, doctors at the University of Mississippi Medical Center in Jackson began administering an aggressive triple-drug treatment 30 hours after the baby was born prematurely in 2010.

Read more from this story HERE.

SF Community Activity Proposes Crack Pipe Handouts to Prevent HIV

Photo Credit: AFP

Photo Credit: AFP

Could handing out free crack pipes help roll back the spread of HIV? The San Francisco HIV Prevention Planning Council (HPPC) insists that it could and that crack pipe distribution programs in Canada are doing just that.

“San Francisco has a long history of being at the cutting edge of things that we have turned out to be very right on… and I would like to see this one be another of those things that we were right about before the rest of the country catches on,” says Laura Thomas, HPPC representative.

The HIV community activist admits that this “great program” of offering fresh pipes to crack addicts may seem “counter intuitive.” She points out, however, that unlike dirty hypodermic needles, crack pipes don’t transmit HIV. Thomas explains, “Once you can bring people into your program, make them feel respected, taken care of, then they’re more likely to come back and get on HIV meds and want to be engaged and taking care of their health.”

Read more from this story HERE.

Report: 2 Men with HIV thought To Be Cured See Reappearance of Virus

Photo Credit: NIAID

Photo Credit: NIAID

Researchers are saying a pair of HIV-positive men from Boston, thought to have been cured of the disease after undergoing bone marrow transplants, has since seen the reappearance of the virus that causes AIDS in their bloodstream.

The Boston Globe reports a team led by Dr. Timothy Henrich, an infectious disease specialist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, revealed the disappointing findings on Friday at a Florida conference on HIV.

“This suggests that we need to look deeper, or we need to be looking in other tissues . . . the liver, gut, and brain,” Henrich told The Globe. “These are all potential sources, but it’s very difficult to obtain tissue from these places so we don’t do that routinely.”

Both patients reportedly had undergone bone marrow transplants to combat lymphoma – and had since then stopped taking the costly cocktail of medicines that keeps HIV from reproducing in the body. HIV is a virus that attacks – and destroys – the body’s immune system. An HIV-positive patient is said to have AIDS once their immune system has deteriorated beyond a certain, clinically measured point.

In one of the Boston patients’ cases, the virus reportedly reappeared after 12 weeks of not having taken medication. In the other, it returned after 32.

Read more from this story HERE.