Posts

Will Kamala Harris Cause a Democratic Party Jan. 6 Crisis if She Loses?

Vice President Kamala Harris’s closing election message is that former President Donald Trump is a fascist who loves Adolf Hitler. It could set the stage for more Jan. 6 chaos if Harris loses.

Harris has decided that grocery prices or illegal immigration should take a backseat in her campaign messaging to declaring that Trump is a fascist and promoting an anonymously sourced hit piece from the Atlantic, which previously published anonymous claims about Trump that were rebutted on the record by multiple people, that claims Trump repeatedly praised Hitler.

Of course, it is entirely possible that Harris doesn’t believe any of this, as calling Republicans “Hitler” has been a Democratic tradition going back 60 years, as my colleague Christopher Tremoglie has detailed. Harris is losing minority support in polls, which might best explain why she is invoking the Nazis so she can racially fearmonger votes without having to do the legwork of actually winning those voters over.

However, she is running for president and should be treated as if she believes what she says, which leads to a conundrum as Harris would be overseeing the certification of a Trump win on Jan. 6, 2025, if Trump does manage to beat her. Harris, through a spokesperson, said she would certify a Trump victory, but that was way back in July, just four days after President Joe Biden dropped out of the race. A lot has changed since then, and Harris herself hasn’t said one way or another what she would do. (Read more from “Will Kamala Harris Cause a Democratic Party Jan. 6 Crisis if She Loses?” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Trump: ‘I’m Not Supposed To Say It, but We’re Leading by So Much’

Former President Donald Trump told his audience at a Turning Point Action rally in Las Vegas, Nevada, Thursday night that he is leading Vice President Kamala Harris “by so much” that he is expanding the electoral battleground.

Trump shared that Harris is on a downward slide that was even worse than President Joe Biden’s, which forced him out of the race so she could ascend to the top of the ticket.

“Now she’s imploding worse than him. She’s actually imploding, if you take a look, because look, I’m not supposed to say it, but we are leading by so much,” Trump said to thunderous applause.

“We’re leading by a lot in Nevada. We’re leading by a lot in Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, even states that are typically never in play for 50, 60, 70 years,” he added, pointing to New Hampshire as one example.

“And they like us, but you know what? They think she is grossly incompetent,” he added. “Let’s face it. She’s not doing well … We can’t have her as president. We’ve had that for four years. We’re not going to go another four years.” (Read more from “Trump: ‘I’m Not Supposed To Say It, but We’re Leading by So Much’” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Fact-Checking the Kamala Harris CNN Town Hall

Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee for president, answered questions in a CNN town hall with anchor Anderson Cooper Wednesday night. She repeatedly condemned her Republican opponent, former President Donald Trump, in the harshest of terms, even saying that she thinks he is a fascist.

The Daily Signal fact-checked many of her claims.

‘Terminate the Constitution’

Harris touted the fact that former Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., endorsed her against Trump. The vice president said Cheney backed her due to “a legitimate fear, based on Donald Trump‘s words and actions, that he will not obey an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

“He himself has said he would terminate the Constitution of the United States,” she added.

The claim traces back to a post Trump wrote on Truth Social on Dec. 3, 2022. In that post, the former president wrote of the 2020 presidential election, “A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.”

He added, “Our great ‘Founder’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!”

Fellow Republicans criticized his comments, and Trump later clarified that he would not terminate the Constitution.

In a follow-up post, he condemned the legacy media’s interpretation of his post.

“The Fake News is actually trying to convince the American People that I said I wanted to ‘terminate’ the Constitution,” Trump said in a Truth Social post on Dec. 5, 2022.

Hitler’s Generals

Harris said she believed Trump is a fascist and she repeatedly tied him to the Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler.

Harris claimed that Trump said to his generals “in essence, why can’t you be more like Hitler’s generals?”

The vice president was referencing an Atlantic article by Jeffrey Goldberg citing anonymous sources, claiming Trump said, “I need the kind of generals that Hitler had.”

Trump spokesman Alex Pfeiffer said the claim is “absolutely false,” and that “President Trump never said this.”

That article claimed Trump ordered then-White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows not to pay for the funeral of 20-year-old Army private Vanessa Guillén, calling her a “f—ing Mexican.” Meadows denied the story and Guillén’s sister accused The Atlantic of “exploiting my sister’s death for politics.”

‘Suckers and Losers’

Harris claimed that Trump referred to members of the military as “suckers and losers,” that “he demeans people who have taken an oath to sacrifice their life for our country.”

The claim that Trump called members of the military “suckers” and “losers” originates from a 2020 article published in The Atlantic relying on anonymous sources. Trump has consistently disputed the reports.

‘Price Gouging’

Harris attributed inflation to “price gouging.” When CNN’s Cooper asked her about whether the Trump administration or the Biden administration was responsible for inflation, she suggested that her experience as attorney general in California would help her fight inflation.

“How I come to it is probably a new approach grounded in a lot of my experiences as a former attorney general, where I took on price gouging and part of my plan is to create a new approach that is the first time that we will have a national ban on price gouging, which is companies taking advantage of the desperation and need of the American consumer and jacking up prices without any consequence or accountability,” she said.

Other Democrats, such as President Joe Biden and Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., have attributed inflation to companies’ greed.

As Heritage Foundation Research Fellow EJ Antoni pointed out, there is a far more obvious culprit: government spending.

As Antoni noted, “One of the functions of money is that of a measuring tool. If a yardstick were to shrink from 36 inches down to just 30, it would take 120 of these shortened yardsticks to cover the distance of a football field, instead of 100. As the dollar has lost value, it takes more dollars to measure the value of the things we buy.”

While Americans feel the pain of inflation, so do businesses. According to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, “businesses have gotten the short end of the stick,” Antoni explained. “The producer price index is used to measure inflation on the products and services businesses buy—sometimes called wholesale inflation—and that index has risen 17.5% since Biden took office. Conversely, the consumer price index, the widely cited metric for inflation faced by American families, is up 17.1% over that same time.”

“Businesses have actually been sheltering consumers from some cost increases in an effort to maintain market share and not lose customers,” he wrote. “That also explains why, according to the Biden administration’s Census Bureau, total corporate profits have fallen for the last six quarters after adjusting for inflation.”

“If alleged price gouging were really the cause of inflation, did businessmen magically become greedy when Biden took office?” Antoni asked. “Were corporations never greedy in the 40 years leading up to Biden’s inflationary expansion of government? Businesses haven’t even passed all their higher costs on to consumers; if they’re trying to be greedy, they’re doing it all wrong.”

‘Women Have Died’

When discussing state abortion laws in the wake of the Supreme Court striking down the abortion precedent Roe v. Wade (1973) in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022), Harris claimed, “Women have died because of these laws.”

She has repeatedly mentioned the name Amber Nicole Thurman, suggesting that she died due to Georgia’s law restricting abortion.

Yet Thurman died after she took the abortion pill, which caused complications and left parts of her twin unborn babies inside her.

Thurman legally obtained abortion pills in North Carolina to end the lives of her unborn twins, but she could not know without an ultrasound (which the FDA had required only a few years beforehand). Five days later, she began to abort the twins, but both babies’ remains remained in her uterus. She began to develop sepsis and went to the hospital.

Doctors hospitalized her, but she died before they could perform a dilation and curettage to remove the remaining parts of her unborn babies.

Harris blamed Thurman’s death on a law restricting abortion, but the law would not prevent the removal of the babies’ remains when they were already dead. The FDA’s loosened restrictions on the abortion pill, not Georgia’s law, is arguably to blame for this tragic death.

Prefer to Run on the Problem

Harris repeated her claim that Trump killed a bipartisan border bill earlier this year “because he’d prefer to run on a problem instead of fixing a problem.”

Yet critics have warned that the bill would have cemented Biden’s open-border policies into law.

Cooper pressed Harris on why the Biden administration used executive orders to reverse many Trump border policies in January 2021. He noted that illegal aliens crossed the border in large numbers after those orders, and the numbers only decreased when Biden issued other executive orders. He asked her whether she regrets the weaker border policies.

Harris replied that only Congress could solve the ultimate problem. Cooper again pressed her on whether Biden should have issued the 2024 executive orders sooner, and she replied, “I think we did the right thing.”

(For more from the author of “Fact-Checking the Kamala Harris CNN Town Hall” please click HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Kamala Chickens Out of Joe Rogan Interview

Vice President Kamala Harris has reportedly turned down an invitation to appear on Joe Rogan’s popular podcast and the widely followed All-In podcast, according to venture capitalist and tech mogul David Sacks. The news, which surfaced during a recent podcast episode, has ignited debate over Harris’s decision to avoid what many see as two of the most influential platforms in today’s media landscape.

Sacks, a co-host of the All-In podcast, revealed that the offer was extended to Harris, but she declined to participate. “Kamala won’t face the tough questions,” Sacks claimed, fueling speculation that the vice president may be avoiding high-profile interviews where she could face more unscripted and challenging conversations. The All-In podcast, known for its freewheeling discussions on politics, technology, and culture, often features high-level guests, and the opportunity for Harris to reach a wide audience has now become a missed one.

Joe Rogan’s podcast, known for its in-depth and often controversial interviews, also boasts millions of listeners. The vice president’s decision to decline both platforms has raised eyebrows, especially considering Rogan’s reputation for asking provocative, sometimes uncomfortable questions of his guests. Harris’s avoidance of these media outlets has led to criticism from both political opponents and members of the media, some of whom argue that this reflects a pattern of the administration being unwilling to engage in tough, unfiltered dialogue.

Social media was quick to respond to Sacks’ revelation, with many expressing disappointment at Harris’s decision. One user on X (formerly Twitter) commented, “Kamala’s avoiding Joe Rogan? She can’t handle real questions.” Another user added, “She’s scared of facing the truth—both Rogan and All-In would have exposed her.” Supporters of Harris, however, defended her choice, suggesting that the platforms are not conducive to the type of meaningful conversation needed at this critical time. (Read more from “Kamala Chickens Out of Joe Rogan Interview” HERE)

Harris-Biden’s Last-Minute Migrant Moves Are an Attempt To Hide Their Border Mess

Vice President Kamala Harris and President Biden are rushing to cover up the mess they made of the border in a brazen bid to fool voters ahead of Election Day.

Border Patrol agents are raising the alarm that Harris-Biden have ramped up busing and flying migrants from San Diego, now the hotspot for illegal crossings, to less-full border towns in Arizona and Texas — states that have taken it upon themselves do what Harris-Biden wouldn’t.

An insane June order forced San Diego border agents to release migrants from over 100 countries into the United States; now the city’s overrun, with facilities at 112% capacity.

Harris-Biden’s solution: Spread the problem around and hope no one notices.

And if towns like Yuma, Ariz., and McAllen, Texas, don’t want to absorb the consequences?

Tough: Democrats have an election to win. (Read more from “Harris-Biden’s Last-Minute Migrant Moves Are an Attempt To Hide Their Border Mess” HERE)

Kamala Harris Literally Tells Voters at Rally to Not Vote for Her

At a recent rally in swing state Wisconsin, Kamala Harris singled out and humiliated two attendees for the crime of showing religious principles — even as she gave props to a pro-Hamas heckler at another Badger State campaign stop. . .

When Grant Beth and Luke Polaske yelled out Christian slogans to express opposition to Harris’ stance on abortion, she shot back: “You guys are at the wrong rally. I think you meant to go to the smaller one down the street.” . . .

This would be political malpractice at the best of times: Literally telling voters to get lost.

But Harris faces a coin-flip election fight with a newly resurgent Donald Trump. . .

But the veep just said, in effect, that if you don’t align with her 100% on abortion … just go away: You shouldn’t even think about voting for her. (Read more from “Kamala Harris Literally Tells Voters at Rally to Not Vote for Her” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Kamala Harris Wants To Force Christian Hospitals To Perform Abortions Against Their Will

On Tuesday, Kamala Harris voiced opposition to providing religious exemptions in any federal legislation legalizing abortion nationwide in the event that such legislation is brought to her desk as president.

The moment came during the vice president’s sit-down interview with NBC News’ Hallie Jackson. The network anchor asked Harris how she would advance baby-killing legislation at the federal level if elected president and Republicans control both chambers of Congress. Jackson also asked if she would be willing to make any “concessions” to get any prospective bill to her desk.

Instead of answering the question, the Democrat presidential nominee pivoted to attacking President Donald Trump for appointing three U.S. Supreme Court justices who voted to overturn Roe v. Wade. She also falsely characterized the murder of unborn children as an issue of “freedom.”

“I know that there are members of the United States Congress who are well aware that their constituents are in favor of the very fundamental principle that a woman should be able to make decisions about her own body and not have her government tell her what to do,” Harris said while ignoring how abortion denies the unborn children the ability to “make decisions” about their bodies.

Jackson followed up by again asking Harris what “concessions” she’d be willing to make with a Republican-controlled Congress. The NBC host specifically queried if “religious exemptions” were “something [Harris] would consider.” (Read more from “Kamala Harris Wants To Force Christian Hospitals To Perform Abortions Against Their Will” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Trump Teases a Lawsuit Over That ‘60 Minutes’ Transcript

CBS News continues to find themselves embroiled in scandal after refusing to release the transcript of their edited “60 Minutes” interview with Vice President Kamala Harris from earlier this month. While the network put out a statement on Sunday, that’s hardly the end of the story. As Fox News reported on Monday night, the Trump-Vance campaign is still looking for answers, and may even turn to a lawsuit as a result.

The Fox News report mentioned key sections of the letter from Edward Andrew Paltzik, legal counsel for Donald Trump:

In a copy of the letter obtained by Fox News Digital, Trump’s legal counsel Edward Andrew Paltzik, writing on behalf of Trump, said that CBS News “intentionally misled the public by broadcasting a skillfully edited interview transcript… aimed at causing confusion among the electorate regarding Vice President Kamala Harris’s abilities, intelligence, and appeal.”

“News organizations such as CBS have a responsibility to accurately represent the truth of events, not distort an interview to try and make their preferred candidate appear coherent and decisive, which Harris most certainly is not,” the attorney wrote. “Due to CBS’ actions, the public cannot distinguish which Kamala Harris they are seeing: the candidate or the puppet of a behind-the-scenes editor.”

“President Trump is rightly alleging that CBS’s ‘doctoring’ of Harris’s answers on 60 Minutes was deceptive. The allegation is not simply that CBS was dishonest; it is that CBS deceived viewers into thinking Harris’ answer was, at the very least—as CBS put it—more ‘succinct’ than the word salad it actually was,” Paltzik wrote. “The executives and producers at CBS, and 60 Minutes in particular, are unquestionably aware that the purpose behind editing the Interview was to confuse the electorate and portray the Vice President in a better light than a full, unedited transcript would reveal. Responsible news sources must be held accountable to the highest standards.”

(Read more from “Trump Teases a Lawsuit Over That ‘60 Minutes’ Transcript” HERE)

‘Break up Family Relationships’: Biden-Harris Admin Pushes Judges To Bring Gender Ideology Into the Courtroom

Parents increasingly find family court judges, who make life-changing decisions involving children, have fully bought into the agenda pushed by Biden-Harris administration-backed transgender activists.

State courts have for years independently hosted transgender activist groups to lecture judges on appropriate pronoun usage and the importance of “affirming” a child’s perceived identity. But now the federal government is on board: In 2023, the Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a $1 million grant to integrate gender ideology into juvenile justice and child welfare systems nationwide.

The grant, awarded to the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ), established a resource center to train judges, child welfare workers and other professionals involved with the juvenile justice system on sexuality and gender identity. The materials encourage judges to adopt an ideological framework that pits children against parents who do not support their self-selected identities.

“Gender identity is now being used as a cudgel to essentially break up family relationships,” Sarah Parshall Perry, senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, told the DCNF. “This is especially so in cases where parents are not affirming the gender identity of their minor children, and among other things, this particular grant is fueling the fire because we’re seeing sort of a partnership between the federal government, which is all in on the gender identity madness, and these state judges.”

Elected state judges are able to initiate child protective services investigations or even send children to foster care, Perry told the DCNF. Multiple parents across the country who declined to affirm their child’s gender confusion have already reported losing custody. (Read more from “‘Break up Family Relationships’: Biden-Harris Admin Pushes Judges To Bring Gender Ideology Into the Courtroom” HERE)

Christian Students Speak out After Kamala Harris Told Them They Were at the ‘Wrong Rally’

A pair of Christian students trolled by Kamala Harris and mercilessly mocked by the crowd at her rally at the University of Wisconsin-La Cross last week insist they were “there for the right reasons.”

Grant Beth and Luke Polaske, both juniors at the school, told “Fox & Friends Weekend” that they felt persecuted akin to Jesus and his early followers after they shouted such things as, “Christ is king!” when the Democratic vice president-turned-presidential candidate started talking about abortion rights.

One of them said Harris even sarcastically waved to him and gave him “an evil smirk” as he held up the cross around his neck and pointed to her while being booted with his pal.

“I was pushed by an elderly woman. We were heckled at, we were cursed at, we were mocked, and that’s the biggest thing for me personally,” Beth said. “In reflection of the event, Jesus was mocked. You know, his disciples were mocked, and that’s OK.

“In reality, we did God’s work, and we were there for the right reasons, and God is watching us in this moment,” he said. “I’m all about being a cordial person no matter your beliefs, but I do believe that we were sent there by God.” (Read more from “Christian Students Speak out After Kamala Harris Told Them They Were at the ‘Wrong Rally’” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr