Posts

Teen Accused of Killing Man in Horrific Knockout Gets Anger Management and Zero Prison Time

John Weed was enjoying the Frederick County, Maryland, Fair last September when a group of teens surrounded him and beat him to death. One of the two brothers involved who later spat on Weed’s lifeless body has now been sentenced by the judge. Did he get the death penalty, which is what Weed suffered in front of his own family in broad daylight at a rural county fair? Nope, he was told to report to anger management class. Welcome to justice in America?

It’s a trend all over the country where groups of predominantly black teens, often numbering 20 or more, surround a victim – black or white – and beat the individual, sometimes to death, in the ultimate act of group cowardice. There is simply no deterrent against these attacks. These kids usually have long rap sheets and never get prison time. Now, we see that is the case even after they kill.

At the time of the killing last year, Frederick County Sheriff Chuck Jenkins, who was at the fair when the attack occurred, lamented on my podcast that he feared these kids would get off with little prison time. Thanks to a broken juvenile system and liberal judges in Maryland, the two primary perpetrators were only charged as juveniles.

According to the Frederick New Post, the judge ordered the older of the two, 16, last Wednesday, to report to a juvenile facility for anger management classes. The paper reports that one of its reporters was asked to leave the courtroom by Judge Julie Stevenson Solt because “much about the case that would be discussed, especially regarding the teen’s past and other details, would be too sensitive to be shared in open court.”

Thus, as we all suspected, this juvenile involved in the killing had a rap sheet. But fear not, Judge Solt scheduled a disposition hearing for sometime in the fall “to determine whether the teen has complied with the terms of his probation.”

The prosecutor ultimately agreed to a plea deal that only charged the 16-year-old for spitting on the lifeless body, not for second-degree murder.

Sheriff Jenkins was indignant in his statement to Conservative Review:

“There was no justice here for John Weed or his family. There should have been severe punishment for the two young men, which was warranted by the malicious nature of the act, not ‘rehabilitation.’ I have been convinced since the evening it occurred (I was there just seconds later) that it was an unprovoked violent attack on someone they viewed as unsuspecting and an easy target while walking with his family. Although the crime did not meet the statutory requirements of being a hate crime, I continue to believe it was. My view is based on the fact that they spit on and taunted a man who was clearly down and unconscious, in fact dying on the asphalt. There is no worse form of humiliation or desecration to a person. There was no regret or remorse for that attack.”

Why is there no effort on the part of Republicans to demand national anti-knockout legislation as well as stronger deterrent against juvenile criminals?

Often, these people serve little or no time, even though these attacks can lead to serious injury or death. Furthermore, the cowardly perpetrators will often have only one person initiate the attack, but that attacker is surrounded by 5-15 friends who ensure that the victim has no way of defending himself. Those who play this support role never face any consequences whatsoever.

It’s time for lawmakers in the various states to begin pushing for anti-knockout legislation. It’s time to deter predatory pack attacks and take them as seriously as the evil they bring on our neighborhoods. Conservatives should push legislation in state legislatures to create mandatory minimum sentences for predatory attacks and mandate that juveniles engaged in these attacks be charged as adults. Furthermore, there needs to be some punishment for those who join in the packs that engage in violence. It’s time to take the game out of the knockout game.

Then there is the juvenile issue. How eerie it is to look back at the observation from President Reagan’s Task Force on Victims of Crime from nearly four decades ago when the culture of violence wasn’t nearly as bad as it is today: “Juveniles too often are not held accountable for their conduct, and the system perpetuates this lack of accountability,” wrote the members of the commission in their recommendations for action.

The Reagan commission argued that “a study should be commissioned at the federal level to evaluate the juvenile justice system from the perspective of the victim.” The commission observed that the juvenile system was created for those who commit low-level crimes, not those who end the lives of others. “Armed robbery, rape, and murder cannot be laid at the door of mere immaturity or youthful exuberance,” noted the commission. “The victims of these crimes are no less traumatized because the offender was under age.”

The commission recommended trying those who commit “adult crimes” as adults.

“It is unacceptable for a juvenile who commits murder to serve only a year in custody. Imposing such a sentence implies to both the killer and the victim’s family that expiation for the life taken can be accomplished in 12 months.”

Tell that to the family of John Weed. His attackers will not get even a year in prison.

With crime and violence surging across the country, it is increasingly being committed by younger people. Yet both parties are paralyzed by a system of racial obsession rather than blind justice, so they refuse to implement stronger deterrent. Imagine if the roles in the Frederick case were reversed. How much time do you think the offenders would serve in such a case? How much media coverage would there be? Well, I think we know the answer to the latter question based on the dichotomy in coverage between George Floyd and the case of Cannon Hinnant, the 5-year-old white boy who was allegedly gunned down in cold blood last week by a career criminal who happened to be black.

This travesty of justice comes on the heels of a sickening video from Portland, Oregon, showing a mob of BLM/Antifa rioters surrounding a motorist and dragging him out of his car while beating him unconscious. These motorist attacks are occurring across the country with impunity as our deterrent level has dropped to that of a third-world criminal justice system.

Then there is Damire Palmer, the 18-year-old caught on camera beating a white Macy’s employee in Michigan in June. It appears he will now avoid jail time and will have his felony record expunged after he finishes probation.

Why can’t we all agree as a society that all violent crime needs to be strongly deterred and severely punished – and that punishment meted out equally regardless of the identities of the offenders and victims?

Finally, if randomly beating people to death and receiving no punishment creates a lack of deterrent, what about self-defense from the standpoint of potential victims? If the government won’t deter and punish crime, can citizens at least exercise their God-given natural right to self-defense? Well, Maryland has that figured out too. Most people are barred from carrying a concealed firearm of any caliber under any circumstance, especially at a place like a county fair. So, if you are walking or driving with your family in a blue state or city, you just better pray that you are not preyed upon by a mob of juvenile criminals.

Unfortunately, with the current trajectory in the country, most people are more likely to die at the hands of the mob than from coronavirus. And there is no vaccine for this ailment – at least not one that our governing elites are willing to administer. (For more from the author of “Teen Accused of Killing Man in Horrific Knockout Gets Anger Management and Zero Prison Time” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

GOP Congressman Calls for DOJ Investigation After Church Is Fined for Holding Service During Lockdown

A Maryland church was fined for holding a service despite the county’s coronavirus stay-at-home order, prompting a call for the Department of Justice to investigate.

A Sunday service was held at Calvary Baptist Church in Dundalk, Maryland, on May 24 despite a stay-at-home order in Baltimore County, according to CBS 13 Baltimore.

“Our people were just ready to come back to church,” pastor Stacey Shiflet said.

The punitive fine leveled at the church inspired Rep. Andy Harris, a Maryland Republican, to demand the Department of Justice get involved.

“If Baltimore County does not withdraw the fine by the time of the hearing on Tuesday, I do intend to ask the DOJ to investigate,” Harris said in a statement.

Attorney General William Barr has spoken out against churches being unfairly targeted during the coronavirus shutdown, saying that “the Constitution is not suspended in times of crisis.” (Read more from “GOP Congressman Calls for DOJ Investigation After Church Is Fined for Holding Service During Lockdown” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Pro-Gun Software Developer Was Asleep at Home When Police Killed Him in Gun Bust, Family Says

A Maryland software developer was asleep in his bedroom when police opened fire from outside the house and shot him dead, according to his family.

The Montgomery County Police Department said in a news release Friday that Duncan Socrates Lemp, 21, “confronted” police who were executing a “high risk” search warrant at the Potomac home early Thursday. They said a tactical unit member fatally shot Lemp around 4:30 a.m.

According to police, the officers were “following up on a complaint from the public that Lemp, though prohibited, was in possession of firearms.” . . .

Friends said they never heard Lemp espouse any anti-government rhetoric. Sandler said Lemp was not a part of any anti-government or militia-type group.

“He was pro-America and supported wholeheartedly all the protections of the Constitution,” she said. (Read more from “Pro-Gun Software Developer Was Asleep at Home When Police Killed Him in Gun Bust, Family Says” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

In Maryland, You Can Release MS-13 Murderers, but You Can’t Release… Balloons?

Balloons? Bad! Illegal alien MS-13 murderers? Good!

Is that the message Maryland’s politicians are sending to its taxpayers?

Maryland’s urban areas are in the midst of the worst crime crisis ever, even rivaling the crime waves of the 1970s and 1980s. But fear not, they are getting tough – really tough – on those soft round things that bring joy to the eyes of any toddler.

On Monday, the Maryland Senate passed a bill 38-3 (SB28) that would prohibit balloon “releases” in the state unless they’re for scientific research. Violators above the age of 13 will face a penalty of up to $250. That’s certainly a lot more than the teen carjackers terrorizing my suburban Baltimore neighborhood pay when they get released with no prison time. The bill now heads to the House, where Democrats have an insurmountable super-majority.

With record homicides both in Baltimore City and Baltimore County, there has not been a single piece of legislation passed this session dealing with tougher sentencing and closing the criminal loopholes that allow the release of so many violent criminals into the human ecosystem. But it’s worse than that.

The same Maryland Democrats who have a sense of urgency to act out against what they see as harmful balloon releases are also championing the release of even the worst criminal alien gang members.

Maryland has a Salvadoran illegal alien gang problem of epic proportions, perhaps the worst in the country, especially in sanctuary jurisdictions like Montgomery and Prince George’s counties. The Washington Post observed the MS-13 problem there was “fueled by fresh recruits from an unprecedented wave of almost 200,000 unaccompanied minors from El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras.” Baltimore City is also a notorious sanctuary for criminal aliens.

Last year, Prince George’s County passed a bill, in contravention to federal law and against the warnings of its own police department, to prohibit county officials from working with ICE in any capacity, even for the detention and removal of the worst criminal aliens.

In May 2018, two MS-13 members were arrested on murder charges but were released despite an ICE detainer and barely served time in prison. Almost exactly a year later, they were arrested again for first-degree murder of a 14-year-old, and authorities still wouldn’t honor an ICE detainer!

Last year, Montgomery County became a national laughingstock when a local reporter revealed that it had released numerous illegal alien rapists, including child rapists, back into the communities in defiance of ICE detainers.

Yet there is no sense of urgency in Maryland’s legislature to deal with the ultimate pollution of our streets – the release of other countries’ dangerous gang members who prey on children. Where do we see their passion? Fining kids who release balloons.

We already knew that liberals have no regard for the safety of our communities and children. Now we know they also want to take the fun out of their lives. (For more from the author of “In Maryland, You Can Release MS-13 Murderers, but You Can’t Release… Balloons?” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Can a Judge Force Trump and Texas to Resettle More Refugees? NO

The Founders created a system in which all three branches of government would have to independently defend the Constitution. They gave the judicial branch the fewest tools to impose its will on issues affecting the population at large. Never in their wildest dreams did they envision the other branches genuflecting to the Supreme Court, much less lower court judges, but that is what will continue happening until they simply say, “No.”

Yesterday, a single Maryland judge gave private taxpayer-funded “nonprofit” organizations standing in court to get an injunction against the president’s policy allowing states like Texas to reject their resettlement plans. “Refugee resettlement activity should go forward as it developed for the almost 40 years before Executive Order 13888 was announced,” declared Judge Peter J. Messitte of the Maryland District Court, a Clinton appointee.

Here’s the problem. The Constitution never gave a judge a veto power, like the president has the ability to veto a piece of legislation sent to his desk. A judge can only grant relief to a plaintiff that properly has standing before the court, such as a citizen claiming an executive force is wrongly detaining or punishing him. No such standing exists, however, in this case, because the “plaintiffs” are a bunch of private organizations seeking positive actions and benefits from government affecting all of America on a national and even international political question, not “relief” from an action taken against them personally.

No judge can force the president to bring in foreign nationals he chooses not to admit, nor can a judge grant visas to potential foreign nationals. And a Maryland judge most certainly can’t force Texas Gov. Greg Abbott to agree to refugee resettlement just because a taxpayer-funded group desires it.

Naturally, the question I get asked is “What now?” How can Trump push back against the ruling? But the question is silly and is only asked because of the lack of education about our most basic rules of governance. The bigger question is how a single judge can push back against the other branches and what power he has to effect his ruling? Can a judge order the president to sit down and have brunch with me every Sunday, and is there nothing the president could do to stop it? Can a judge order the president to pursue specific strategic maneuvers with the military or forge specific policies with foreign leaders?

In reality, not only are there many constraints on judicial power, but our Founders didn’t even believe they needed constraints, because even when judges are not abusing power and when they are properly interpreting the law, they have no power of enforcement. While observing that the Supreme Court would be the “least dangerous” branch of government, Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist #78 that the court has “neither force nor will, but merely judgment, and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm for the efficacy of its judgments.”

Notice Hamilton doesn’t talk about presidents or governors “defying” courts. He does one better. From the get-go, court orders have no force and require “aid” from the executive branch just to get on the map, especially affirmative policies, such as border security, issuance of visas, and printing of census questions. As Eleventh Circuit Judge William Pryor once said, “Hamilton’s point was that we must depend upon the persuasiveness of our written opinions to command the respect of our fellow citizens. In that way, we have the foremost responsibility of safeguarding our independence.”

In Federalist #81, Hamilton dismisses concerns from anti-federalists that somehow because the courts interact with the people under the law at the end of the policymaking process, they will laugh last and laugh best, having the final say on the implementation of a law or a policy. He called the concern, which today has become a reality, “a phantom.” Why could he easily dismiss the concern of judicial usurpations? Because of the Supreme Court’s “comparative weakness” compared to the other branches in “its total incapacity to support its usurpations by force.”

The Constitution simply never gave the courts a veto power such as it gave to the president. An injunction is merely a form of relief granted in an individualized case or controversy. But if a judge is going to use that case to somehow illegally adjudicate a policy issue with no standing and issue a broad policy directive, even if he is correct on the merits, it has as much effect as a declaration from me or you or any private citizen absent the affirmative “aid” of the executive branch.

Implicit in Hamilton’s design is obviously the premise that the presidents and governors have the power to not grant aid to court rulings and, under the right circumstances, will use that power. Denying the judiciary the power of enforcement is not a bug in the system; it is a feature.

For example, throughout Trump’s presidency, there have been numerous times when judges have given standing to litigate an immigration policy where statute explicitly strips the courts of jurisdiction to hear the case. Just yesterday, the ACLU sued the administration’s third-party asylum agreement with the Guatemalan government that allows asylum-seekers from Honduras and Guatemala to be sent there. The law says, in black and white (8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3)), “No court shall have jurisdiction to review any [asylum exemptions] determination of the [DHS secretary] under paragraph (2),” including Safe Third Country agreements. Thus, the courts have no power to adjudicate this case and certainly no power to enforce a usurpation.

The Trump administration has an obligation to uphold the law and not give force to any judicial usurpation the same way everyone agrees a judge has an obligation to uphold the law or Constitution and not give force to an executive action wrongly imprisoning a citizen. If anything, the executive branch is the one with the power to implement its legal interpretation, much more than a court.

Therefore, when Texas Governor Greg Abbott is faced with a ruling from an illegally adjudicated case in another state as against the president’s interpretation of law, he also has a requirement to follow the one he knows to be correct. To say that any court at any time on any issue has the final word would violate the basic principle of government laid out by James Madison in Federalist 49: “The several departments being perfectly co-ordinate by the terms of their common commission, neither of them, it is evident, can pretend to an exclusive or superior right of settling the boundaries between their respective powers.”

Imagine that Madison and Hamilton were alive today and were asked, “Which branch is more powerful – Congress or the Supreme Court?” They would laugh at the absurd premise of the question. Imagine that they were asked, “Which is more powerful – Congress or a district court?” They wouldn’t even understand the question.

Then consider the absurdity of how far the malignant practice of judicial supremacy has been allowed to grow. Presidents of both parties have consistently rebuffed congressional subpoenas and other orders from standing committees. This just recently happened during the impeachment hearings. Everyone understands the principle of separation of powers in this context, and nobody asks, “How can the president defy Congress?” But somehow when a district judge seeks to rule on an abstract national question, it is instantaneously and unquestionably binding over all the states and other branches of government – no matter the authenticity of the legal rationale or whether courts exercised a valid use of the judicial power at all.

Instead, it’s time we start asking how judges can defy the other branches of government and plainly written law. The answer is they can’t. (For more from the author of “Can a Judge Force Trump and Texas to Resettle More Refugees? No” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Speaker Removes Democrat Involved in ‘N-Word’ Scandal From Leadership Post

By Daily Wire. Maryland Democrat House Speaker Michael Busch removed Democrat Delegate Mary Ann Lisanti from a leadership position she held on a subcommittee after she apologized for allegedly referring to a majority-black county as a “n****r district.”

“Lisanti, a Democrat from Harford County, told reporters she would issue a statement later in the day,” the Associated Press reported. “She apologized to the House Democratic Caucus Tuesday morning, after apologizing to leaders of the state’s Legislative Black Caucus on Monday.”

In a statement, Lisanti said: “I am sickened that a word that is not in my vocabulary came out of my mouth. It does not represent my belief system, my life’s work or what is my heart.”

Lisanti also apologized to “the citizens of my district, people of Maryland, all of my colleagues in the Maryland General Assembly and everyone reading this for my word choice several weeks ago.”

“This morning, Delegate Mary Ann Lisanti apologized to the House Democratic Caucus for her use of the n-word. While I believe her apology was heartfelt, the damage among her colleagues and the public has been done,” Busch said in a statement, according to the Baltimore Sun. “I met with her this morning and expressed my extreme disappointment and concern over her irresponsible and hurtful actions.” (Read more from “Speaker Removes Democrat Involved in ‘N-Word’ Scandal From Leadership Post” HERE)

____________________________________________________

Maryland Delegate Loses Leadership Position Over Racial Slur

By NBC Miami. A white Maryland lawmaker lost her leadership position Tuesday after using a racial slur for black people at an after-hours gathering at a cigar store in the state capital.

Del. Mary Ann Lisanti, a 51-year-old Democrat in her second term representing Harford County northeast of Baltimore, apologized to the Maryland House Democratic Caucus on Tuesday. A day earlier she issued an apology to leaders of the state’s Legislative Black Caucus.

Del. Darryl Barnes, the caucus chairman, described the apology as “woefully inadequate” and urged House Speaker Michael Busch, in a letter, to discipline the delegate. . .

The Washington Post was first to report Monday that Lisanti allegedly used the slur late last month during a gathering with fellow legislators to refer to Prince George’s County, which is majority black. Asked about it by the newspaper earlier this month, the Post reported that she said: “I don’t recall that … I don’t recall much of that evening.”

When asked by the Post whether she had ever used the slur, the newspaper reported that she said: “I’m sure I have … I’m sure everyone has used it.” (Read more from “Maryland Delegate Loses Leadership Position Over Racial Slur” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Multiple Deaths Reported in Maryland ‘Active Shooter Situation’

Three people were killed Thursday morning in a shooting at a Rite Aid distribution center in northeast Maryland, officials said.

A law enforcement official with knowledge of the shooting stressed that the number of dead is based on preliminary information. The official wasn’t authorized to discuss details by name and spoke on condition of anonymity to The Associated Press.

The attack came nearly three months after a man armed with a shotgun attacked a newspaper office in Annapolis, Maryland, killing five staff members.

The FBI described the Aberdeen incident as an “active shooter situation” and said its Baltimore field office was assisting.

The Harford County Sheriff’s Office tweeted that the shooting involved “multiple victims” and warned that the situation was still fluid and asked people to avoid the area.

In a tweet, Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan said his office is monitoring the situation in Aberdeen and that the state stands ready to offer any support.

Susan Henderson, spokesman for the drugstore chain Rite Aid, said the shooting happened on the campus of a company distribution center in Aberdeen. She described it as a support facility adjacent to a larger building.

One witness described her frightened reaction to CNN affiliate WJZ.

The woman, described as Colleen Hendrickson, a resident who works in the area, told the station she was waiting for a bus when she heard from anothe person there had been a shooting.

“I, of course, thought it was far off or, that’s like down the road or something, right?” she told WJZ. “No, it’s right outside. It’s right on the doorstep.”

She saw emergency vehicles, including ambulances, and helicopters, which were out of place for the “sleepy” part of the county, she said.

The area is home to many warehouses and plants, some belonging to major brands, including makeup and bleach companies.

“It’s really just usually very calm, and this is the most chaotic I’ve ever seen it,” she told WJZ.

“It’s very scary when it’s just right there on your doorstep because you can see a billion news reports about shooters, about emergency instances, and it still doesn’t make it real to you. (For more from the author of “Multiple Deaths Reported in Maryland ‘Active Shooter Situation’” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Devastating: U.S. City Slammed With Flash Floods

Rescue personnel here were searching Monday for a man missing after rampaging waters roared like a river through the quaint, historic downtown, swallowing cars and flooding stores and homes — just two years after a similar devastating deluge.

The town was pounded by almost eight inches of rain Sunday. When the flash flooding receded, first responders walked through the ravaged downtown area, its Main Street strewn with debris. The disaster was similar to a flash flood two years ago that killed two people. . .

Ray Miser was sitting on his porch Sunday as at least 2 feet of water began rushing past his home. “It sure was a sight,” he said. “There were logs and everything just floating like I was living on a river.”

Miser, 77, said he’s watched other floods hit the area, including the 2016 disaster. But his elevated two-story home made it through again. “You just got to pray,” he said.

Gardner said 911 call systems were bombarded with about 1,100 calls that started when the flooding began at about 4 p.m. Sunday. Fire Chief John Butler said first responders assisted in the evacuations of about 300 people, more than two dozen of them water rescues from “a high level of danger.” (Read more from “Devastating: U.S. City Slammed With Flash Floods” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Shock: High School Students Pull ‘Prank’ Mass Shooting at School

By The Daily Wire. School officials at a high school in Maryland are apologizing to parents after a group of senior students pulled a prank at the school simulating a mass shooting. The students behind it are now facing potential criminal charges.

WJLA reported that approximately 20 students participated in the prank on May 15. Clad in black masks ran into the school setting off firecrackers to simulate gunshots and then shot kids with squirt guns that were filled with various liquids.

Emily Birckhead, a student at the school, was injured by the fireworks, and sustained second-degree burns on her ear, adding that someone squirted her with vinegar and that she had heard that other people were squirted with urine.

(Read more from “Shock: High School Students Pull ‘Prank’ Mass Shooting at School” HERE)

_________________________________________________

Bowie High School Students in Black Masks Simulate School Shooting as a Senior Prank

By WJLA. . .The students face discipline and possible charges. The incident occurred in the high school’s main building, according to a letter from Bowie High School principal Robynne W. Prince.

“Around 10:45 a.m., a small group of students participated in an inappropriate “senior prank” that resulted in a school evacuation,” the letter in part reads. “The prank involved spraying students and staff with squirt guns and setting off fireworks in the hallway.”

“School administration is taking this incident very seriously and coordinating with local police; the students involved will be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law and disciplined according to the PGCPS Student Code of Conduct.” (Read more from “Bowie High School Students in Black Masks Simulate School Shooting as a Senior Prank” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Maryland Police Officer Second to Be Murdered Within 12 Hours

A Maryland police Medal of Valor winner was shot and killed Wednesday while intervening in a domestic violence dispute, officials said, making him the second police officer killed in the U.S. in just a 12-hour span.

Police named 14-year veteran Cpl. Mujahid A. Ramazziddin, 51, as the officer killed in the confrontation. He was off duty at the time of the incident. He was assigned to the Special Operations Division.

According to a news release from Prince George’s Police Department, Ramazziddin was assisting a female neighbor “who was being threatened by her estranged husband.” The armed suspect fatally shot the officer and left the area in a black SUV, police said.

NBC Washington reported the officer was a veteran of the Marine Corps and a father of four children. . .

The SUV was spotted shortly after by law enforcement and a pursuit began, the news release said. The suspect ditched his vehicle and reportedly engaged in “an exchange of gunfire.” Officers shot and killed the man as he attempted to flee in a wooded area, NBC Washington reported.

(Read more from “Maryland Police Officer Second to Be Murdered Within 12 Hours” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.