Posts

Mayo Clinic Study Raises Concerns Over Irreversible Harm and Possible Cancer Link with Puberty Blockers for Boys

A groundbreaking study conducted by the Mayo Clinic has delivered a sobering message, challenging prevailing beliefs surrounding the safety of puberty blockers for boys undergoing gender dysphoria treatment. Contrary to assertions made by transgender activists, the research suggests that these blockers may inflict irreversible harm on male physiology, with potential implications extending to cancer risks.

The preprint study, drawing upon data from the Mayo Clinic’s Pediatric Testicular Biobank for Fertility Preservation, unveiled troubling findings regarding the effects of puberty blockers on young males. Specifically, the research focused on testicular specimens from 87 biological males under the age of 18, including 16 gender dysphoric boys aged 10 to 16, nine of whom had been administered puberty blockers for varying durations.

Disturbingly, the study revealed instances of testicular atrophy and abnormalities among transgender patients who had undergone puberty suppression. One particularly alarming case involved a 12-year-old boy who experienced significant testicular shrinkage and microlithiasis – a condition associated with testicular cancer – after just 14 months of puberty blocker usage.

Moreover, a 14-year-old boy who had been on puberty blockers for over four years exhibited profound impairment in sperm production, raising concerns about long-term fertility consequences.

The study’s findings challenge the prevailing narrative that puberty blockers are entirely reversible and underscore the urgent need for further investigation into their safety and efficacy. Researchers caution that gender-affirming care with these blockers could potentially induce permanent alterations in gene expression patterns, with far-reaching implications for male reproductive health.

The study’s release has ignited a broader conversation about the risks associated with puberty blockers for young males. Notably, author J.K. Rowling, known for her criticism of the transgender agenda, highlighted the study’s significance on social media, drawing attention to its implications for medical practices and patient care.

Photo credit: Flickr

“Unjust & Reprehensible” Federal Government Sentences Iraq War Vet J6 Protester to 1 Year Less Than Islamic Terrorist Who Plotted to Murder Americans

Here’s a story that largely went unnoticed for years but deserves attention. In 2020, a 31-year-old Muslim immigrant doctor [Pakistani Muhammad Masood] was arrested by the FBI for plotting to become a “lone wolf” terrorist aligned with ISIS. This doctor, who entered the United States on an H-1B visa, used encrypted messaging to communicate with overseas terrorists. Initially, he had plans to rendezvous in Syria, but that was thwarted due to COVID. Later on, he arranged to meet with terrorist operatives within the U.S., which led to his arrest by the FBI.

Remarkably, this individual once held a position at the prestigious Mayo Clinic. He has recently been sentenced to 18 years in prison for his actions. . .

[This] brings to mind Joe Biggs. Biggs, an Iraq War veteran and recipient of two Purple Hearts, was sentenced to 17-years in prison for the “terrorist” act of cutting a fence at the Capitol on January 6th. Biggs will serve one year less than a foreign-born Muslim convicted of plotting to join ISIS and kill innocent Americans. It’s mind-blowing how our government treats a non-violent US war vet the same as a guy plotting to team up with ISIS and murder innocent Americans. It’s truly unjust and reprehensible what our government has become. (Read more from ““Unjust & Reprehensible” Federal Government Sentences Iraq War Vet J6 Protester to 1 Year Less Than Islamic Terrorist Who Plotted to Murder Americans” HERE)

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.

Major Health System Terminates Hundreds of Employees for Refusing to Get COVID-19 Vaccine

Amid the nationwide spike in omicron cases, the Mayo Clinic moved forward with firing 700 employees on Tuesday who refused to get the Covid-19 vaccine.

Employees of the Rochester-based health system had until Monday to comply with the mandate or receive a religious or medical exemption.

“While final numbers are still not available, nearly 99% of staff across all Mayo Clinic locations have complied with the required vaccination program, meaning they have been vaccinated or have received medical or religious exemptions,” the clinic said in a statement.

“This means that approximately 1% of staff across all locations will be released from employment as a result of the required vaccination program,” the statement continued. “This is comparable to what other health care organizations have experienced in implementing similar vaccine requirement programs. ”

The Mayo Clinic said it is “saddened” to fire non-compliant employees but deemed the action justified to “keep our patients, workforce, visitors and communities safe.” (Read more from “Major Health System Terminates Hundreds of Employees for Refusing to Get COVID-19 Vaccine” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.