Posts

3 BIG Lies From the Democratic Debate Just Got Exposed, and Americans Need to Know It

The truth was a casualty of Tuesday night’s Democratic presidential debate.

Hillary Clinton shaded the facts about her use of a private email account while she was Secretary of State and fudged her position on the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, D-Vt., wrongly placed the United States as the world’s leader in wealth and income inequality.

Clinton, whose defense of her private email server has shifted repeatedly over time, said during the debate that what she did was “allowed by the State Department.” However, Clinton was supposed to turn over her personal emails to the Department at the end of her tenure, not two years later as she did. Also, using a private account for all her work emails was “inconsistent with long-established policies and practices under the Federal Records Act and NARA regulations governing all federal agencies,” according to congressional testimony of Jason R. Baron, a former director of litigation at the National Archives.

Clinton recently spoke out against the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a trade agreement among Pacific Rim nations. Debate host Anderson Cooper called out Clinton on her changing positions at Tuesday night’s debate . . .

Clinton told Cooper that when the trade deal was unveiled, she “hoped” it would be the “gold standard” for agreements.

However, that’s not what she said.

(Read more from “3 BIG Lies From the Democratic Debate Just Got Exposed, and Americans Need to Know It” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Media Thumps Trump, Here’s How That’s Affected the Polls

By Niall Stanage. Rumors of Donald Trump’s demise may have been greatly exaggerated.

Ever since rival Carly Fiorina was widely perceived to have bested Trump at the second GOP debate in California on Sept. 16, media outlets have been lining up to suggest that the front-runner is waning.

Trump has hit back with characteristic vigor. But he has a point, independent observers say . . .

Much of the negative media attention has been built around a single poll in the immediate aftermath of the debate, by CNN/ORC.

A survey from Fox News released earlier this week showed the businessman at 26 percent support nationally, an increase of 1 point since Fox’s last survey in mid-August. A Bloomberg poll gave him 21 percent — good enough for a 5-point lead over the field and an unchanged rating since the last poll from the financial news outlet at the beginning of August. (Read more from “Media Thumps Trump, Here’s How That’s Effected the Polls” HERE)

_____________________________________

Rubio Ramping up Campaign With More Time in Early States

By Catherine Lucy and Kathleen Ronayne. After a summer largely spent raising money for his Republican campaign for president, Marco Rubio says he’s about to start spending a whole lot more time in Iowa and the other early voting states.

“There were obviously other things we needed to do,” the Florida senator said this past week in an interview with The Associated Press. “We need the resources to be able to have staff here and be on the air and do the things a campaign requires. But, we were just here a few days ago. We’re going to be back a lot more.”

Following a return to Iowa next week he’ll go to the other three states — New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina — that are voting in the initial wave of presidential caucuses and primaries, his campaign advisers said.

Rubio recently hired a state director in Iowa, a position other campaigns have had in place for months, and has booked millions in television ads that will start airing in November.

For Republican activists and party faithful used to fawning attention, it’s about time. (Read more from this story HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

The Eventual Republican Nominee Will Be One of These Six Candidates

Chris Christie, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Scott Walker, Donald Trump, Jeb Bush, Mike Huckabee, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, John KasichIt seems as if there are 3,742 people campaigning to be the Republican Party’s nominee for president in 2016. But when you look at history, environment, and the candidates’ various strengths and weaknesses, only six have a real shot at being the party’s eventual standard-bearer.

Although the first official votes in the process won’t be cast in my home state of Iowa for another 162 days, you can already see the fault lines forming in the race that will dictate its outcome. While it’s true Iowa doesn’t always pick the nominee, it has selected one of the major party’s nominee 75 percent of the time (including the last four general election winners). Plus, the GOP has never nominated somebody who didn’t finish in the top three in Iowa.

So even if we’re not quite as sure about their identities, I believe it’s possible to predict which three types of candidates will get their tickets punched out of Iowa to continue forward to New Hampshire and beyond.

Come February 1st, Iowa’s top three will represent these factions:

The Conservative Candidate

Right now the conservative base is mostly splintered. But the next phase of the process this fall will be conservatives determining which candidate they should coalesce behind for the final push of the campaign. While several decent conservatives are running this cycle, only three have any shot at being the conservative champion by the time Christmas rolls around — Ted Cruz, Mike Huckabee, and Scott Walker. They are the only three conservatives who can put an organization on the ground here capable of winning Iowa.

Endorsements will play a big role in my home state because conservatives are going to have a difficult time choosing between these three. Momentum has been gathering around Walker’s record, Cruz’s courage of conviction, and Huckabee’s likeability and winsomeness. The two most important endorsements in the Iowa Caucuses are pro-family activist Bob Vander Plaats and Congressman Steve King. If a candidate were to land both of their endorsements, there is little doubt they would win Iowa because conservatives – especially evangelicals – dominate Iowa Caucus turnout.

The Establishment Candidate

Jeb Bush is toast in Iowa. He’s already worked the state much harder than Mitt Romney’s stealth campaign did in 2012, and it’s gaining him no traction. Iowans just aren’t buying what he’s selling, and historically if you’re not competitive in Iowa you’re just not competitive—period. Instead of being the Romney of 2016, Bush is more like the Rudy Giuliani of this cycle. He’s mostly a media-driven “frontrunner” that collapses like a house of cards once the campaigning gets underway.

Republican-in-Name-Only Governor Terry Branstad and the GOP establishment in Iowa actually favor Chris Christie. There is a personal relationship there and they’ve even shared staff. Yet Christie is damaged goods as a candidate, so I think the GOP establishment will eventually go with Marco Rubio instead. He also has a personal rapport with Branstad, and Team Rubio was instrumental in helping Joni Ernst get elected to the U.S. Senate last year. It was Team Rubio who conjured the famous “squeal” ad that went viral and made Ernst a household name.

Overall, Rubio is probably more conservative than the establishment would like, but he’s also moved their way on the two issues the GOP establishment wants most to be to the left of the Democrats on—immigration and marriage. So he has shown he will play ball when push comes to shove.

The Outsider Candidate

Due to the GOP establishment’s failure to truly offer the American people a second party alternative to the Democrats, there is a bloc of traditional GOP voters this primary cycle looking for a third party option to their own party.

Just look at Donald Trump. He’s still leading the phony polls (you shouldn’t put much stock in) despite the fact he’s not truly pro-life, he’s not in favor of defunding Planned Parenthood, he’s taken no position on religious freedom, and now he’s to the left of Chuck Schumer on Obama’s Iran deal. But people see his brashness and his wealth as symbols that he can’t be bought off by the corporatists on K-Street and the amnesty-pimps at the Chamber of Commerce.

Then there’s Ben Carson, who has name I.D., likability, money, and organization. He’s sort of Trump’s alter ego. If Trump is using bombast and “Flight of the Valkyries” to sell his outsider candidacy, Carson is going with dignity and smooth jazz.

Nonetheless, while they’re the top two in the phony polls right now, one of the hardest things to do in politics is to mobilize new voters to take part in a partisan process. That’s especially so in the Iowa Caucuses, which are unlike a primary in that they can take a commitment of a couple of hours on election day. Furthermore, celebrity candidates often learn in the end there’s a difference between “admirers” and “supporters.” One of these two will learn that lesson in Iowa and be sent home, while the other one will be encouraged to press on.

Conclusion

Sunday’s latest Fox News poll is a bellwether in the race. If you add up the support for the least conventional candidates (Trump, Carson, Cruz, and Carly Fiorina), it’s more than double what all the other candidates have combined. Furthermore, all the conventional candidates have lost support since the pre-debate survey.

It’s also clear none of the attacks on Trump have hurt him but instead have actually hurt his attackers. GOP primary voters are sending the following message to his campaign rivals: We don’t want you to attack Trump while he’s attacking the GOP Establishment/Liberal Media cabal – we want you to outdo him. (Re-posted with permission, “The Eventual Republican Nominee Will Be One of These Six Candidates”, originally appeared HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Carly Fiorina: A Conservative Candidate?

images (71)Editor’s note: Although this author does not discuss it, another indicator that Ms. Fiorina is no friend of real conservatives is Karl Rove’s staunch past support. He encouraged major GOP contributors to spend millions on Ms. Fiorina’s 2010 US Senate campaign, even though she had no chance of winning. This starved other competitive conservative Senate campaigns in Nevada, Alaska, Colorado and other states of much needed contributions.

Several of my friends have opined that Carly Fiorina would make a great VP to Donald Trump. She sounds so good, and she makes some valid points, but actions speak louder than words, as we all well know. In my book, Carly Fiorina is just another Trotskyite, and if you won’t go that far, she clearly uses Marxist techniques. Read on, and I’ll explain. . .

At HP, Carly presented herself as a realist regarding the effects of globalization. She was a strong proponent, along with other technology executives, of the expansion of the H-1B visa program. Fiorina responded against protectionism in an editorial in the Wall Street Journal, writing that while “America is the most innovative country,” it would not remain so if the country were to “run away from the reality of the global economy”. . .

Carly Fiorina chooses to believe that the Islamic Ottoman Empire was the greatest in the world. Like Chris Christie, she is snuggled with Islamists. In a speech that was given a mere two weeks after Islamic jihadists attacked America, the former HP chief executive officer gave a speech on technology, business, and our way of life. She glorified Islam and made only slight mention of European Christians and Jews having much to do with modern civilization.

I would urge you to read Fiorina, al-Mansour and the World Economic Forum, from 2010 on Canada Free Press by J.B. Williams. He states in this article:

Carly Fiorina sat on the Foundation Board of the World Economic Forum, which has observer status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council.

Congressional support for global governance will not wane on Carly’s watch. Agenda 21 and “sustainable development” are the new buzz words for “global socialism” through global governance and Carly sits on the Foundation Board at the mother ship.

We should be asking Carly to describe her long-term relationship with Dr. Khalid al-Mansour—aka Don Warden, Black Panther puppet master, Saudi Royal front-man and Obama education financier.

Fiorina sits on other Boards with al-Mansour, such as the African Leadership Academy. Al-Mansour, aka Don Warden, was the man behind the men of the Black Panther movement in the 1960s. He has long held hope for a “black nationalist” president, starting as far back as his relationship with Malcolm X. In fact, X died while speaking at one of al-Mansour’s college campus rallies.

(See also “Carly Fiorina: Islamic Civilization was “Greatest in the World.”)

Carly Fiorina talks a good game for the electorate of America, but, in reality, she is another neo-conservative player who belongs more to the noxious left than to the old Constitutional right. She’ll never get my vote. (Read more at “Carly Fiorina Is No Conservative Candidate”, HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Watch ‘Little Republicans: Presidential Debate Highlights’, It’ll Be Sure to Make Your Day Better

white-house-north-2007-djLast week’s prime time Republican presidential debate sparked so much controversy and coverage, that even children are performing parodies of the night’s tumultuous events.

Funny or Die produced “Little Republicans: Presidential Debate Highlights” which shows 10 kids regurgitating some of the exact words used by the presidential contenders.

(Read more from “Watch ‘Little Republicans: Presidential Debate Highlights’, It’ll Be Sure to Make Your Day Better” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Al Gore Said to Be Looking at Another Run for President

MW-CU841_algore_20140924122959_ZHBy Shawn Langlois. It’ll take more than three emoji to describe how Hillary Clinton must be feeling right now. That’s because a familiar face may have just popped up on her path to the Democratic nomination.

Yes, Al Gore is reportedly talking about a possible run for president in 2016.

Gore, of course, won the popular vote 15 years ago but veered off in different directions, environmental and otherwise, after conceding the White House to George W. Bush.

Having racked up an Oscar and a Nobel peace prize in 2007, Gore has been notably absent from the public eye in recent years. But that could change in a hurry. According to BuzzFeed, a senior Democrat said, “They’re getting the old gang together.” That team is said to be working on “figuring out if there’s a path financially and politically.” (Read more from “Al Gore Said to Be Looking at Another Run for President” HERE)

_________________________________________________

Al Gore Insiders “Figuring out If There’s a Path” for Him to Run

By Andrew Kaczynski. Supporters of Al Gore have begun a round of conversations among themselves and with the former vice president about his running for president in 2016, the latest sign that top Democrats have serious doubts that Hillary Clinton is a sure thing.

Gore, 67, won the popular vote in the 2000 election and has been mentioned as a possible candidate in every contested Democratic primary since then. He instead spent much of the 2000s focused on environmental campaigning and business ventures. He has largely slipped out of public view in more recent years.

But in recent days, “they’re getting the old gang together,” a senior Democrat told BuzzFeed News.

“They’re figuring out if there’s a path financially and politically,” the Democrat said. “It feels more real than it has in the past months.”

The senior Democrat and other sources cautioned not to overstate Gore’s interest. He has not made any formal or informal moves toward running, or even met with his political advisers about a potential run. (Read more from this story HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Who Won the Republican Debate? The Pro-Life Movement, and the Next Baby It Saves

Baby-held-by-mom-and-dad_cropped_compressedA skilled surgeon needs a scalpel, but killers can get by with cudgels. That is because it’s a whole lot easier to smash a skull than to separate conjoined twins. America’s abortion status quo is corrupt and callous, a regime of highly organized crime which lets abortionists legally kill an unborn child through all nine months of pregnancy for any reason, and be massively subsidized by the government to do it. Taxpayer-funded Planned Parenthood clinics are strategically planted in poor, non-white neighborhoods across the country, still serving Margaret Sanger’s racist mission of getting “more children from the fit, fewer from the unfit.” More than a million American children have been destroyed each year, every year since 1973. And now we know that Planned Parenthood is selling those dead children to labs to boost its “revenue streams.”

The pro-choice movement defends this annual human sacrifice with blunt, heavy-handed weapons, which it uses to keep control. But those weapons are losing their force, as the prime-time Republican debate resoundingly proves. In fact, the only clear winner of that debate was the pro-life movement.

Abortion’s best defenses are ignorance and apathy. When pro-lifers succeed in getting out truthful information that makes people care — like the videos captured by the Center for Medical Progress — the Abortion Syndicate sends out enforcers with lead-weighted truncheons in the form of gag orders, distortions and lies.

The biggest, heaviest lie that these thugs like to swing around is the charge of “extremism.” Most normal people don’t want to think of themselves as isolated zealots. So if someone is speaking a highly inconvenient truth, the best way to squelch it is not to engage his arguments, but to claim that he’s out there alone, then rouse all the sheep to try to drown him out, ala Animal Farm: “Pro-choice good, pro-life b-a-a-a-a-a-d!”

In the primetime Republican debate, Megyn Kelly of FoxNews tried out this sheep bomb on more than one candidate. She went hardest after America’s most effective pro-life governor, Scott Walker of Wisconsin. In the same style she used to confront Donald Trump for his piggish remarks about women, Kelly confronted Walker with his support for a no-exceptions law protecting all unborn life.

She cited a study suggesting that Walker was out of sync with 83% of Americans. Kelly clearly expected him to backpedal, cave, or flinch, but she must have forgotten who Walker is: The governor who month after month faced down the angry mobs recruited by greedy public employee unions. Walker didn’t blink, but calmly reiterated his support for a blanket protection of every unborn child in America. Then he noted that he had defunded Planned Parenthood four years ago, long before its appalling human organ trafficking business was even exposed, and called out Hillary Clinton as the real extremist for standing behind that violent organization. Walker’s answer was a real profile in courage — and a tribute to the strength and dedication of America’s pro-life movement.

Kelly then turned her fire on Marco Rubio, trying to claw out a “gotcha” moment by quoting New York’s Cardinal Dolan, who criticized pro-life politicians that will not protect unborn children conceived in the course of rape or incest. She assumed that Rubio embraced those broad and easily-abused exceptions, and demanded to know how he would answer the cardinal’s attack. Rubio looked puzzled, and quickly corrected Kelly: He had never endorsed abandoning those unborn children either, and wondered where she had gotten that false impression. He went on later to speak of how future generations will look back on us as “barbarians” for “murdering millions of babies.”

The truth about abortion was running free all through the debate, and the Abortion Syndicate’s soldiers were surely shaking in their jackboots. Ted Cruz was characteristically eloquent and forthright in unfolding his pro-life record. Jeb Bush cited his own consistent pro-life lawmaking, but another questioner pressed him hard for having sat on the board of the Bloomberg Foundation that funded Planned Parenthood. He defended himself, in part, by pointing to Florida funding he had provided to pro-life pregnancy centers. I hope that the hard-working, unpaid volunteers who man (but mostly woman) these front-line emergency wards for mothers with crisis pregnancies take heart from this: A leading candidate running for president wants to wrap himself in your flag. Pause for a moment. Be proud of yourselves.

Mike Huckabee was bold enough to speak of using the 5th and 14th Amendments to correct the ignorant decision of Roe v. Wade, which science has rendered hopelessly outdated. The latest technology has shown us clearly and unmistakably the humanity of the unborn, and the law must catch up with the verdict of modern medicine.

No one asked Rand Paul, Ben Carson, Chris Christie, or John Kasich about abortion, but their pro-life positions are not in doubt. In fact, here at the top-card debate of the leading presidential candidates for the Republican nomination, not a single candidate was willing to call himself pro-choice. At the afternoon debate with the darker-horse contenders, only one Republican, the almost forgotten George Pataki, fessed up to that position — and really, what has he got to lose?

Even Donald Trump had to claim that he had a pro-life conversion. No it wasn’t convincing, but he felt constrained to say it — this man who is blunt enough to violate nearly every tenet of political correctness and even common courtesy. He had to say it.

At this debate, foreign aid to Israel, of all things, was up for dispute between Chris Christie and Rand Paul. But abortion wasn’t. No Republican was willing to embrace the extremist position that favors our current status quo of a million dead babies each year. That tells us something: The hearts and minds of Americans are changing. The truth is out. The thugs are on the run. (Re-posted with permission from the author, “Who Won the Republican Debate? The Pro-Life Movement, and the Next Baby It Saves”, originally appeared HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Fox News Couldn’t Kill Trump’s Momentum and May Have Only Made It Stronger [+video]

downloadBy Joshua Green. A few hours before Thursday’s Fox News debate, a friend of Donald Trump’s confided to me that Trump was nervous. Not about the competition—he could handle them. No, Trump worried about Fox News, and in particular, debate moderator Megyn Kelly. She’d been hammering him all week on her show, and he was certain she was out to get him. He’d canceled a Fox News appearance on Monday night, the friend said, in order to avoid her. (Trump’s spokeswoman wouldn’t confirm or deny this.)

It turns out Trump was right. His toughest opponents Thursday night weren’t the candidates up on stage, but the Fox News moderators, who went right after him—none with more gusto than Kelly.

Kelly, the whip-smart queen of Fox News’ blonde stunners, went straight for the jugular. “You’ve called women you don’t like fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals,” she admonished Trump. “Does that sound to you like the temperament of a man we should elect as president?”

But Trump saw her coming a mile away and cut her off. “Only Rosie O’Donnell,” he barked, drawing cheers from the crowd. When Kelly tried to point out that he had insulted more women than O’Donnell, Trump, as he would all night, steamrolled right past her. “The big problem this country has is being politically correct,” Trump practically shouted, invoking conservatives’ favorite term of disdain. “I’ve been challenged by so many people and I don’t frankly have time for total political correctness and to be honest with you this country doesn’t have time either.” The crowd went wild.

Maybe they were cheering because the question was apropos of something Rachel Maddow would ask, and they were, after all, Republicans. But I think they were cheering because it was clear, at that moment, that Trump was going to be Trump, and wasn’t going to heed the pundits and phonies to tone down his act. According to a report in New York magazine, even his own daughter, Ivanka, was making that case. (Read more from “Fox News Couldn’t Kill Trump’s Momentum and May Have Only Made It Stronger” HERE)


_______________________________________________________________

Trump Slams Fox News, Praises Drudge

By Elliot Smilowitz. Donald Trump thinks reader polls on Drudge Report and Time Magazine should carry more weight in judging public reaction to Thursday’s GOP presidential debate than a Fox News panel that ran immediately after the debate.

Speaking with Don Lemon live on CNN on Friday night, Trump lauded his winning performance in reader polls asking who won the debate, particularly the poll run by Drudge Report.

“I’m not saying I won, I’m just telling you polls that came out from Drudge,” he said. “What’s better than Drudge? He’s a fantastic guy. What he’s built is unbelievably respected.”

The Drudge Report poll asked readers who won the debate. Trump led with 45 percent of the vote. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) came in second with 14 percent, and no other candidate had more than 11 percent support.

Trump also cited coverage by Time Magazine, the New York Times and the Washington Post that he said showed him as the victor. (Read more from this story HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Huckabee, Trump, and Rubio Take Strong Pro-Life Stance in First GOP Debate [+video]

shutterstock_180970274_810_500_55_s_c1By Ben Johnson. At the first major Republican debate last night, Mike Huckabee promised a “bolder” stance on abortion than any other candidate, Marco Rubio and Scott Walker clarified their position on abortion exceptions, and Donald Trump said he had “evolved” to the pro-life position.

Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor, said he would apply the Constitution’s protections to the unborn at once.

“I’ve actually taken the position that’s bolder than” adopting a Human Life Amendment to the Constitution, he said. “The next president ought to invoke the Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution now that we clearly know that that baby inside the mother’s womb is a person at the moment of conception.”

“This notion that we just continue to ignore the personhood of the individual is a violation of that unborn child’s Fifth and 14th Amendment rights for due process and equal protection under the law,” he added.

President Barack Obama has used his own interpretation of the Constitution to decline to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act and other legislation. (Read more from “Huckabee, Trump, and Rubio Take Strong Pro-Life Stance in First GOP Debate” HERE)

___________________________________________________________

Chris Christie Asks Hillary: Do You Really Support Marketing Babies’ Bodies for Profit?

By Lisa Bourne. New Jersey Gov. and GOP presidential hopeful Chris Christie is calling Democrat presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to the carpet on the Planned Parenthood fetal tissue harvesting-for-profit scandal.

“Now Secretary Clinton, why don’t you answer this question?” Christie said in a campaign video released this week. “Do you support the conduct of Planned Parenthood in the killing of children in the womb in a way that maximizes their body parts for sale on the open market?”

While Planned Parenthood promotes itself as a vital healthcare provider for women, leaders from the nation’s largest abortion business have been caught on a series of upsetting undercover videos bartering for body parts of aborted babies. The videos are currently being released over the course of several weeks, each successive video’s content more alarming than the last, with numerous more to come.

Clinton has been long known as a rabid supporter of abortion.

At one point she presented herself as echoing the country’s prevailing reaction to the Planned Parenthood videos, calling them disturbing, but continued to express support for the abortion giant. (Read more from “Chris Christie Asks Hillary: Do You Really Support Marketing Babies’ Bodies for Profit?” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Judge Orders State Department Turn Over Thousands of Clinton Documents Before Democratic Primary [+video]

Hillary Rodham ClintonBy Morgan Chalfant. A federal judge has ordered the State Department to release thousands of documents to the Associated Press related to former secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the next few months.

The AP reported that U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon on Friday set the schedule for the federal agency’s release of the documents, which are related to longtime Clinton aide Huma Abedin’s employment status in addition to Hillary’s schedules, appointments, and call history while at the State Department.

In March, the Associated Press filed a lawsuit against the State Department, accusing the government agency of failing to respond to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for thousands of documents related to Clinton, one of which was made more than five years ago.

Just last week, Judge Leon blasted the State Department during a court hearing on the case for its lack of response to the FOIA requests.

Leon balked at State’s inability to produce about 60 emails demanded in one particular FOIA request, saying, “Now, any person should be able to review that in one day–one day. Even the least ambitious bureaucrat could do this.” (Read more from “Judge Orders State Department Turn Over Thousands of Clinton Documents Before Democratic Primary” HERE)

_____________________________________________________________

O’Malley Slams Dems for Limiting Debates

By Daniel Halper. Democratic presidential candidate Martin O’Malley is blasting his party for limiting the number of presidential debates. It’s been reported that the Democrats are planning to hold only six debates in the entire primary.

“I want to say right off the bat here, that to those in Washington who think they can limit the number of debates that we’re going to have before the Iowa caucuses, can circle the wagons and close off debates,” O’Malley told a group of supporters.

(Read more from “O’Malley Slams Dems for Limiting Debates” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.