The Washington Post reportedly deleted errors in a story about a conservative author’s book addressing transgenderism without properly notifying the readers of the changes or offering a public apology to the writer for the original falsehoods.

Ryan T. Anderson’s soon-to-be-published book, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Moment,” apparently caught Post reporter Ariana Eunjung Cha’s attention when it shot to the top spot on Amazon’s “Gay and Lesbian” philosophy category. It also garnered the No. 1 position in the social policy and natural law category rankings.

Cha’s original story about the book was released on Friday morning and titled, “Ryan Anderson’s book calling transgender people mentally ill is creating an uproar,” which would be changed later that day after contacting the author.

According to the publisher’s description, Anderson’s work “tackles some of the most pressing issues raised by the movement, which has “gone from something that most Americans had never heard of to a cause claiming the mantle of civil rights.”

In a series of tweets, Matt Franck, director of the Simon Center on Religion and the Constitution, charged The Post with spreading falsehoods about Ryan — a policy research fellow with The Heritage Foundation — and his book.

Yesterday the @washingtonpost ran this story on @RyanTAnd by @arianaeunjung — https://t.co/kJU292RQpO

— Matt Franck (@MatthewJFranck) February 3, 2018

In the original version of her story, Cha wrote, “Anderson makes an inflammatory claim — that transgender people are mentally ill.”

Later in her story, the reporter added, “Anderson is also known for his advocacy of ‘ex-gay’ conversion therapy, which has been scientifically discredited …”

Franck came to Anderson’s defense, noting that “neither of those things was true. The reporter seems to have not contacted Anderson at all.”

Neither of those things was true. The reporter seems not to have contacted Anderson at all.

— Matt Franck (@MatthewJFranck) February 3, 2018

The Post appeared to accede to its errors by changing both the story’s headline and deleting some of its content Friday afternoon.

The original headline, which can still be seen in the link was changed to “Ryan Anderson’s book on transgender people is creating an uproar,” taking out the phrase “mentally ill.”

The phrase was also removed from the story, simply stating instead that Anderson “makes what some feel is an inflammatory case against transgender people.”

Franck pointed out that The Post apparently made contact with Anderson after publishing piece, despite the author’s book being the subject.

Cha included Ryan’s emailed statement to her story in which he said, “Activists want to silence and shame anyone who questions transgender ideology. But there’s too much at stake to remain silent, for what’s at stake is nothing less than the human person.”

Franck wrote of the paper’s revisions, “So after getting crucial facts wrong in its initial story, facts that it was driven to delete in its revised version, how did The Post alert its readers to its corrections? This is how: ‘This post has been updated.’”

“That’s it. No information for its readers on what it had gotten wrong. No apology to the subject about the palpable hit job. Nothing but ‘updated.’ This is a journalist disgrace,” Franck added.

Kelsey Harkness, a reporter with The Daily Signal (which is affiliated with The Heritage Foundation), agreed with Franck’s assessment.

If you're curious why conservatives so often complain about the mainstream media treating them unfairly (and in this case, arguably unethically), read this thread. @RyanTAnd https://t.co/0PABdSKePZ

— Kelsey Harkness (@kelseyjharkness) February 5, 2018

In an email to The Western Journal, Anderson noted that the backlash to his book isn’t surprising.

“As to the reaction to my book, it’s no surprise that it is intense, even from people who haven’t read it,” Anderson stated. “Activists want to silence and shame anyone who questions transgender ideology.”

Contrary to the claims of activists, sex isn’t “assigned” at birth. It’s a bodily fact that can be recognized well before birth with ultrasound imaging. https://t.co/TjwivyFkgX via @RyanTAnd @DailySignal

— Ryan T. Anderson (@RyanTAnd) February 6, 2018

He added, “My goal in writing this book was to help people think about these issues more carefully, and to respond to those in need more charitably.” (For more from the author of “Washington Post Caught Making up False ‘Facts’ About Conservative Author for Transgender Story” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

A federal judge in Washington ruled Monday that while Barack Obama’s administration was allowed to change U.S. military rules based on his political agenda, President Trump cannot reverse the changes.

The temporary block on Trump’s plan to reverse Obama’s order that transgendered individuals be allowed to serve in the military was issued by Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in a case brought by transgenders.

The plaintiffs asserted Trump’s plan, which is under review before being implemented, violates their rights to due process and equal protection under the law under the U.S. Constitution. Kollar-Kotelly said the claim, filed in August, was likely to succeed, asserting the ban was unconstitutional because the administration’s reasons for it “do not appear to be supported by any facts” . . .

“This is where judicial activism is leading us. The courts have moved beyond legislating on the invented rights of abortion and same-sex marriage to clearly usurping the constitutional authority of the executive branch,” said Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council and a Marine veteran.

“The president has the primary task of protecting Americans, but we see the courts weakening his immigration policies designed to protect America from threats and now telling the commander-in-chief how to run the military,” Perkins said. (Read more from “Pro-Trans Judge Tells Trump ‘How to Run Military'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.