Ferguson Police Chief Releases New Info That Turns Michael Brown Shooting Case On Its Head

Photo Credit: kmov

Photo Credit: kmov

By B. Christopher Agee.

Following a vigil held Sunday for the black teen shot by a Ferguson, Mo., police officer the previous day, widespread violence and looting plagued the city, instigated by those upset by incident.

Since then, without details regarding what precipitated the 18-year-old’s death, numerous sources have attempted to convict the officer – and his department – in the court of public opinion. Reports indicate the New Black Panthers traveled to Ferguson to pass out a list of “demands,” which include identifying the officer responsible and charging him with murder.

The group also reportedly wants to see “the racial composition of the Ferguson Police Department” more accurately “reflect the racial demographics of the community.”

As Fox News contributor Todd Starnes noted, Barack Obama spoke out on behalf of Brown and his family but “did not release a statement offering sympathy to the police officer who was allegedly attacked” or “to the business owners whose stores were burned and looted.”

Read more from this story HERE.

_________________________________________________________________________

Ferguson Police Department Implores Protesters To Gather Only During Daylight

By CBS St. Louis/AP.

The police department in a St. Louis suburb where a man was shot and killed by a police officer is asking protesters to gather only during daylight.

Ferguson has been the site of nightly protests and unrest since 18-year-old Michael Brown was killed during a confrontation with an officer on Saturday.

In a news release issued Wednesday, the department asked that all people who assemble to pray or protest do so in “an organized and respectful” manner and disperse well before evening to ensure the safety of participants and the community.

“The City of Ferguson mourns the loss of Michael Brown’s life that occurred of Michael Brown’s life that occurred this past Saturday,” the statement read. “We understand members of our community, and those nationwide, are grieving with us. We have worked diligently to provide an opportunity for our residents to both grieve and voice frustrations through prayer vigils and peaceful protests.”

Read more from this story HERE.

'Terrorists Have Never Had It So Good': Levin Blasts 'Truly Pathetic Commander-in-Chief’

Photo Credit: Fox News

Photo Credit: Fox News

By Fox News Insider.

Radio host Mark Levin was on “Hannity” to sound off on the crisis in Iraq, where ISIS has offered to Christians the ultimatum of “convert or die.”

“Our enemies, the terrorists, have never had it so good under this truly pathetic commander-in-chief who should be in Washington, D.C., right now calling Congress into session, getting authorization to use deadly military power against these cockroaches,” Levin said, adding that Obama should be announcing what the administration is going to do instead of repeatedly announcing what it’s not going to do.

Levin called the situation in Iraq “a direct threat to the United States” and “a direct threat to humanity.”

“This is genocide, pure and simple,” he said.

Read more from this story HERE.

__________________________________________________________________

Photo Credit: Twitter

Photo Credit: Twitter

‘Chillin’ With My Homie or What’s Left of Him’: British Rapper Turned ISIS Jihadist Poses with Severed Head as they Seize More Key Towns Close to Syrian Border with Turkey

By John Hall.

A British rapper who travelled to Syria to fight for ISIS has posted a photograph on Twitter showing himself posing with a severed head.

The sickening image was taken in the city of Raqqa – the capital of ISIS’ self-declared caliphate – and uploaded to the social media site along with the caption ‘Chillin’ with my homie or what’s left of him.’

The photograph shows masked former rapper Abdel-Majed Abdel Bary, 23, holding the decapitated head while standing in Raqqa’s central square – the same location where the seven-year-old son of Australian jihadist Khaled Sharrouf was seen holding a different severed head earlier this week.

The shocking image of Bary emerged as ISIS militants seized a number of key towns and villages close to Syria’s northern border with Turkey.

Read more from this story HERE.

________________________________________________________________________

How Would You React To A Neighbor Flying The ISIS Flag, Because It Just Happened Here In The U.S.

By Justen Charters.

A resident in Garwood, New Jersey is generating a firestorm of controversy for flying the flag of terror group – ISIS.

A photo of the flag was posted on social media by Twitter user, Marc Leibowitz:

terrorism-Leibowitz

Read more from this story HERE.

Palin Backs Tea Party Favorite Joe Miller for Alaska GOP Senate Nod

10394632_10152614363085396_283413591855743722_nBy Fox News.

Sarah Palin is throwing her support behind Tea Party favorite Joe Miller in the looming Republican primary for the Alaska Senate race.

The former Alaska governor and GOP vice presidential nominee announced her support Friday in a written statement, provided to Fox News.

The statement said:

“To restore liberty, to defend our Constitution, to build American exceptionalism, we must send fighters to the U.S. Senate who will stop Barack Obama’s fundamental transformation of the nation we love. The status quo has got to go, and in Alaska the man who understands this key to our state and country’s future also has the guts, wisdom, experience and optimism to fight for what is right — and win.

“We said we’d send the good guys in Washington their reinforcements, so, Alaska, here we go! Vote for Joe Miller on Tuesday and shake off the liberal stronghold so we can get on the right track.”

Read more from this story HERE.

________________________________________________________________

Gov. Sarah PalinGovernor Sarah Palin Endorses Joe Miller for U.S. Senate

Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin announced her endorsement of Joe Miller for U.S. Senate. On Fox News earlier today she said, “To restore liberty, to defend our Constitution, to build American exceptionalism, we must send fighters to the U.S. Senate who will stop Barack Obama’s fundamental transformation of the nation we love. The status quo has got to go, and in Alaska the man who understands this key to our state and country’s future also has the guts, wisdom, experience and optimism to fight for what is right — and win.

“We said we’d send the good guys in Washington their reinforcements, so, Alaska, here we go! Vote for Joe Miller on Tuesday and shake off the liberal stronghold so we can get on the right track.”

Miller responded to the endorsement, “I want to thank Governor Palin for backing my candidacy at this crucial time in the race. She, like many Alaskans, has looked at the the candidates vying for the Republican nomination, and recognized I am the candidate who will go to Washington, stand up to the DC Establishment, and fight to restore freedom to the people.”

Miller campaign spokesman Randy DeSoto added, “I believe one reason we are seeing such a groundswell of support and endorsements as the election nears is because of what Alaskans have seen during the debates. Joe’s opponents are hedging on issues like protecting the unborn (neither was willing to support Rand Paul’s Life at Conception Act in the debate last night), amnesty, climate change, whether Barack Obama has committed impeachable offenses, and the list goes on…”

Miller concluded, “I am proud to stand with Governor Palin in the fight for freedom.”

‘I’ll Burn It Down’: Firearms Inventor Responds to Eric Holder’s Inquiry Into His Gun Safety Idea

Photo Credit: IJ Review

Photo Credit: IJ Review

Kodiak Arms President W.P. Gentry has invented a technology that would restrict gun operation to authorized users only.

The company’s product is called “The Intelligun” and it uses a sensor on the handgrip of a pistol to identify fingerprints. Only those whose prints have been previously entered would be allowed to actually fire the gun.

Enter Attorney General Eric Holder, who invited Gentry to further discussions after meeting with multiple firearms manufacturers earlier this year.

Read more from this story HERE.

Miller Wins Final Debate: Record 9-0

Photo Credit: People's Pundit Daily

Photo Credit: People’s Pundit Daily

Joe Miller demonstrated again tonight why he is the best candidate to defeat Mark Begich, outshining his GOP rivals on the debate stage. He also stated in the final head-to-head matchup before Tuesday’s election, although he expects to win the Republican nomination, he will support whomever the nominee is in the cause of beating Mark Begich.

Miller, responding to a question put to all three candidates about supporting the winner, turned to Dan Sullivan and Mead Treadwell and said, “We must do everything we can to make sure Mark Begich is defeated. I believe I’m going to be the primary winner with the voters’ and God’s help. But if one of you two guys, I have never said this before, I will support you guys. I will. We’ve got to get rid of Begich, there is no question about it.”

Miller’s gesture of unanimity in the cause of defeating Begich to both his rivals came despite Mead Treadwell accusing Miller earlier in the debate of putting out a racist campaign piece regarding his opposition to amnesty. Miller found the charge preposterous pointing out he has no racial ill-will against illegal aliens, but believes our laws must be enforced. He pointed out his son-in-law, father of his first grandchild, is a Mexican national, while his siblings are married to immigrants from India and Indonesia. His daughter is a missionary in Mexico. Miller said, “Lawful immigration, great. We are a nation of diversity. ”

An important area of difference between the candidates centered on Rand Paul’s Life at Conception Act. While both Mead Treadwell and Dan Sullivan stated they support the right to life, neither was willing to offer support for Paul’s bill defining life (with legal protection) beginning at conception. Treadwell spoke of supporting legislation “that helps reduce the number of abortions,” while Sullivan said we should support legislation that “makes the number of abortions less.” Sullivan added that Paul’s statute seems to “try to change the Constitution.” Miller responded, “Unequivocally yes…The Life at Conception Act establishes something I believe is foundational. If we as a country decide we are not going to defend the most defenseless. If we decide the most defenseless lives can be taken. What other rights can government take?” Miller pointed out he is the only candidate endorsed by Alaska Right to Life.

“Joe had another great debate,” said spokesman Randy DeSoto. “He is rising in the recent polls and picking up a string of endorsements in the days leading up to Tuesday’s election including from the Alaska Veterans Party, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, and the Anchorage Tea Party (“ATP”) just announced its endorsement. The group stated though ‘all three Republican candidates are saying things we want to hear, ATP believes that Joe Miller is the only one who can be trusted to take action consistent with his promises.’ With the support grassroots Alaskans, we believe Joe will be the candidate chosen to take on and defeat Mark Begich.”

Allen West Declares Obama An Islamist (+video)

Photo Credit: Alex Wong / Getty Images

Photo Credit: Alex Wong / Getty Images

Former Florida Rep. Allen West declared President Obama an Islamist who is intentionally working against the security of the United States.

“The only plausible explanation for many actions taken by President Obama and his administration is that they are working counter to the security of the United States of America,” the former Florida congressman and retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel wrote in the post published Wednesday.

Among six example he gives to back up his point is Obama’s decision to release of five Taliban in exchange for Sgt. Bergdahl in May, providing weapons of support to the Egyptian government led by the Muslim Brotherhood, and negotiating with Hamas.

Read more from this story HERE.

For Alaska's Future – Opinion: Vote No on 1 August 19th

10269436_510098939101879_7250131040971448395_nProduction Optimism

Is it possible there’s just too much information out there? That’s the way I felt when trying to put together this article on Proposition 1. There are so many numbers being thrown around in the articles and reports I’ve read on Oil Tax Reform in Alaska that most of us will have a hard time separating the wheat from the chaff. Ultimately, the word that defines the whole discussion is “production”, and is the real theme of the debate.

A number that shows how ACES, the oil tax system we’ve had for the last seven years, has failed us, is the average 6% decline in production that ACES was not able to halt. Last year the decline was over 8%. The latest report for this year shows a decline of only 0.13%. That is dramatic change caused by projects that were planned, but not economically feasible before tax reform, to get green-lighted after tax reform made them look better. It’s not about whether the oil companies can make money on a project, but whether they can make more money here than somewhere else. ConocoPhillips reported to their investors making $40/bbl from Lower 48 production, while in Alaska it’s around $34/bbl. Alaska is competing with the world for the limited resources they have to invest.

The old ACES system contained many credits unrelated to production. The More Alaska Production Act (MAPA/SB21) has removed most of those, instead focusing on credits for actually producing new oil. The smaller companies that have been using the exploration credits the last few years are now looking to produce, so it’s perfect timing for the independent producers. It’s important that more companies get involved in our oil industry, bringing competition and diversification.

Something else we need produced is jobs. An average number of 840 jobs were being created yearly before ACES. After ACES came into effect, the number of new jobs dropped in half. Currently under tax reform, jobs are booming on the North Slope.

For many years now, the North Slope producers have had to re-inject natural gas back into the fields to keep the pressure up. Enough time has passed that they are now able to siphon off more of the gas; this along with the new oncoming gas production in Point Thomson is finally going to allow us to have enough gas to fill a large pipeline. It’s critical to keep the oil fields producing so that we can also produce the 3.5 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day needed to supply the Alaska LNG project, which besides lowering all of our utility bills, will help fund the state.
To consider the principle behind Oil Tax Reform, pull out your last pay stub and look at what you paid in taxes. Now imagine that your company alone had a special tax that doubled what you had to pay out. How long would you keep working there? Every project that the oil companies do is evaluated based on cost and returns. If the tax system adds too much cost then they’ll just do one of the many other development projects they have lined up around the world. If you want some real proof of how taxes affect the oil business, take a look at how much activity is going on in the Cook Inlet where there are essentially no production taxes.

ACES came into being in 2007 in the midst of the VECO scandal. As Roger Marks, the petroleum economist points out, “The hysteria of the time gave us ACES: a fluke of history. Afterward, higher oil taxes remained as a misdirected punitive relic of that unfortunate time”. Oil Tax Reform came back on the table in 2010, as it was realized what we had lost with ACES. The Bipartisan Coalition controlled our legislature and so nothing happened, even though polls showed an overwhelming majority of Alaskans were in favor of reform. Even the anti-reform legislators admitted that ACES needed fixing. Oil Tax Reform was a hot issue in the 2012 elections, and the voters replaced a few members of the coalition based on it. The Governor and the legislators in 2014 were finally able to achieve the goal and pass MAPA to reverse our production decline.

In the end, the pivotal issue that Proposition 1 centers around is whether or not production can be increased. Many on the YES side are pessimistic and don’t believe that we can increase production even though we have some of the largest reserves in the world. Governor Parnell was an optimist, and along with our legislature believed that we could increase production, and strove to accomplish that. I will be an optimist on Tuesday, August 19th and vote NO on 1.

Lance Roberts is an engineer, born and raised in Fairbanks. He is a member of the Fairbanks North Star Borough Assembly. The views expressed here are his own and do not represent the assembly or borough administration.

To learn more visit the website and Facebook.

_____________________________________________________________

Voting No on 1 means more job opportunities.

I’m voting NO on 1 but do understand the points made by those who’d vote yes. Here’s a simple argument for those conservatives who are undecided or thinking of voting yes on prop 1.

Who is in the Yes camp? Alaska State Democrat Party, State public employee unions, leading Anchorage liberal D legislators (French, Gara, Wielechowski, and the entire Anchorage Democrat delegation).

About 90% of the Yes side campaign money (nearly $300,000) comes from the Anchorage Gottstein family, a major donor (millions of dollars over the years) to liberal D’s both in Alaska and DC, and anti-resource development causes. The Gottsteins have been major Obama donors over the years and this year pumped in $250,000 to Mark Begich by supporting Democrat SuperPACS, including $150,000 to Harry Reid’s Senate Democrat Majority PAC. They’ve also given money to the Democrat Party to help Harry Reid in Nevada.

Strongly voting NO on 1 are the trade unions. The Teamsters, Operating Engineers, Laborers, and Plumbers/Pipefitters who have seen jobs coming from oil tax reform. The trade unions have come out in favor of resource development issues in Alaska frequently in the past; On the 2008 mining initiative and then against the coastal zone management program ballot measure in 2012. Nationally, for example, they are strong supporters of the Keystone XL pipeline,
so they do oppose the environmental lobbies.

Also solid NO on 1 votes are Alaska small business owners and chambers of commerce, and even some leading native corporations.

Some very good conservatives I know are considering voting yes because of their disdain for unions in general and for Public Unions specifically. They also feel as though ‘Big Oil’ companies are too greedy.

We must realize that unless we entirely exclude oil development by these multinational developers, voting yes or no still pays many of the same folks whether good or not so good. If you really think that Alaska producing less oil year after year is a good thing, then vote Yes by all means.

Voting yes or no will not exclude ‘Big Oil’ development in Alaska. So as long as we’re playing ball with them, voting NO means more job opportunities and a stronger economy for Alaska.

Greg Stoddard
Member ATP Aug 9 2014

The Great Alaskan Heist – Opinion: Vote Yes on Prop 1, August 19

10494776_705786922791602_7942147960296469653_nThe Great Alaskan Heist

Rarely in modern American politics do we see a more blatant example of corruption than the passage of Alaska’s Senate Bill 21 (SB21). Through this oil tax law legislation, Governor Sean Parnell a former chief lobbyist for ConocoPhillips engineered a multi-million dollar transfer of wealth from the citizens of Alaska to his former employer and two other multi-national oil corporations, ExxonMobil and BP. Two state senators who had spoken in opposition to this raid were gerrymandered out of office. Sidestepping the obvious conflict of interest, two other state senators who are concurrently ConocoPhillips employees were allowed to vote on this bill that grants billions of dollars of tax benefits to their employer. The bill passed by one vote. And that, notwithstanding the recent jailing of several legislators for corruption, is how oil politics works in Alaska.

Had this new law been in effect for the last 7 years during which time Sarah Palin’s ACES tax was in place, the state treasury would have received approximately $8 billion less in taxes. The new law is a gift—with no strings attached—to the richest corporations in the history of the world.

Six Months of Saturation Ad Bombing

The multinational oil companies have tried their best to crush Alaska’s grassroots citizen opposition. They’ve spent over 13 million dollars already. Together all the grassroots groups have spent less than $400,000. The companies are outspending the citizen coalition by more than 40-to-1. Around the clock, TV, radio, newspaper, mailers, and the internet bombard the Alaskan public with the oil companies’ message. Even one TV ad is beyond the budget of the citizen groups. Never in history have Alaskans been the target of this much manipulation via the media. It is an avalanche of propaganda. Let’s not be buried by it.

Vote Yes on Ballot Measure 1, August 19.

To learn more visit the website and Facebook.

This opinion piece was written and submitted by the Vote Yes group, it does not necessarily reflect the views of Restoring Liberty or its publishers.

________________________________

Almost 90% of Alaska’s unrestricted revenue is from the taxes and royalties gained from the production by primarily BP, Exxon and ConocoPhillips of oil and gas on state owned and leased land. The stage is set – Alaska is beholden and dependent on a monopoly of 3 of the wealthiest corporations in the world. We fondly, or not so fondly, refer to them as the Big 3.

Right now, oil and gas funds our state and fuels our economy. We have other industries that provide jobs, but very little state revenue. No state income tax could ever be large enough to significantly replace oil revenue. It is imperative that we provide a business friendly environment to the oil and gas industry, while gaining the maximum value from the production of our finite fossil fuels, now and into the future. This weighty responsibility is entrusted to our elected officials. Elected officials who become susceptible to political influence and who generally lack the experience and knowledge base to steer clear of corporate obfuscation and manipulation. Depending on their positions relative to the oil industry, thanks to the Big 3 political candidates can enjoy massive corporate largess or, alternatively, face opponents with overwhelmingly outsized campaign coffers. It becomes very difficult for a politician to distinguish between his own best interest and the companies’ best interest and the state’s best interest. In short, our state is vulnerable to corruption.

Rarely in modern American politics do we see a more blatant example of corruption than the passage of our new oil tax law, the so called More Alaska Production Act. When Governor Sean Parnell first introduced the new oil tax law, the legislature failed to pass it. Enough legislators from both parties were unconvinced that it was appropriate tax reform and good for the state.

However, Governor Parnell reintroduced the tax reform during the next legislative session. Notably, this legislature was tainted by egregious gerrymandering determined to be illegal by the court but allowed to prevail for the election of this legislature, during which 2 state senators outspokenly against the tax reform bill were voted out of office. Furthermore, 2 senators who are ConocoPhillips employees voted on the bill even though their personal conflict of interest was clearly evident. The bill passed by one vote.

Governor Parnell, a former ConocoPhillips lobbyist, successfully shepherded through this new tax bill that offers the Big 3 (including his former employer) a multi-billion dollar tax break during a period when they were experiencing unparalleled profits. Had this new tax law been in effect for the last 7 years, our state treasury would have received approximately $8,000,000,000 less in taxes from the oil companies. Yes, that is $8 billion.

Now we are experiencing budget deficits and current projections reveal that we will be maintaining budget deficits for the foreseeable future and will burn through all our hard fought and guarded savings within the next 20 years or less. There is no backup plan.

This is how oil politics works in Alaska.

Democracy or Corporatocracy

Who is left to balance the message of the Big 3 and their corporate interests with the best interests of Alaskans and the future of this state? The voice of the people must be heard.

We are engaged in a battle to repeal this new tax law, also referred to as SB 21.

After passage of the oil tax law, enough citizens statewide were outraged that, within a few months time, some 50,000 petition signatures were collected to put a “repeal SB21” referendum on the ballot. Successfully accomplishing the required hurdles to get the repeal referendum on the ballot is in itself an amazingly laudable feat.

Those volunteers who worked tirelessly last year to collect the needed signatures, are again called upon to organize and run a referendum campaign across a state more than twice the size of Texas with a population less than 800,000 on a shoe string budget against some of the most powerful and organized corporations in the world.

The Big 3 have contributed over $11 million to combat this repeal effort and together with money from other industry related businesses and a handful of individuals, they have raised over $14 million. Hundreds and hundreds of Alaskans have contributed to support the repeal effort and have raised just under $500 thousand.

The Big 3 have come with tanks and Alaskans are fighting back with sling shots. Despite the overwhelming odds, the repeal effort refuses to be crushed. This is a democracy of the people and for the people of Alaska, not of and for the multi-national corporations.

Be a part of your democracy and vote YES on ballot measure 1, August 19.

Hundreds More Criminal Illegal Aliens With Brutal Records Released Onto American Streets

Photo Credit: TownHall

Photo Credit: TownHall

By Katie Pavlich.

Earlier this year a report from the Center for Immigration Studies showed the Obama administration released 68,000 criminal illegal aliens onto the streets of the United States. Many of those released have criminal records of armed robbery, assault, rape and homicide.

-In 2013, ICE targeted only 195,000, or 25 percent, out of 722,000 potentially deportable aliens they encountered. Most of these aliens came to ICE’s attention after incarceration for a local arrest.

-ICE released 68,000 criminal aliens in 2013, or 35 percent of the criminal aliens encountered by officers. The vast majority of these releases occurred because of the Obama administration’s prosecutorial discretion policies, not because the aliens were not deportable.

-ICE targeted 28 percent fewer aliens for deportation from the interior in 2013 than in 2012, despite sustained high numbers of encounters in the Criminal Alien and Secure Communities programs.

– Every ICE field office but one reported a decline in interior enforcement activity, with the largest decline in the Atlanta field office, which covers Georgia and the Carolinas.

Read more from this story HERE.

_____________________________________________________________

Photo Credit: IJ Review

Photo Credit: IJ Review

The Federal Government Bought A Border Fence…For A Country Nearly 6,000 Miles Away

By Justen Charters.

In April, U.S. policymakers authorized a Crisis Support Package for Ukraine. While the White House had previously released information on what the package would cover, it wasn’t until Thursday that the government published a report detailing how the U.S. would help fund a project for a border fence to help separate Ukraine and Crimea.

From Fedbizopps.gov, here is a screenshot of the contract awarded:

Award-Letter

Read more from this story HERE.

Intel Official: ISIS ‘Sees Conflict With The US As Inevitable’

Photo Credit: Interdependent

Photo Credit: Interdependent

By Jamie Weinstein.

An intelligence official warned Thursday that the terrorist group the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria “sees conflict with the U.S. as inevitable,” The Washington Post’s David Ignatius reported in his latest column.

The columnist, known for his extensive sourcing in the intelligence community, summarized an intelligence briefing he attended:

In a briefing for journalists Thursday, a panel of five U.S. intelligence officials summed up their assessment of an organization that has shown a remarkable durability because it is “patient,” “well-organized,” “opportunistic” and “flexible.” Under the leadership of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the group has rebounded from about 1,500 fighters in 2010 to more than 10,000 today — becoming a global jihadist organization that communicates in many languages.

“We don’t assess this as something that will collapse on its own,” said one of the officials, who commented based on an agreement that their remarks would not be attributed. “But with pressure and alternatives [that might draw away its Sunni supporters], it could collapse over time.” The intelligence experts cautioned that counterterrorist tools, such as drone strikes and other air attacks, wouldn’t be sufficient “to defeat it rather than just ratchet it back.”

Read more from this story HERE.

________________________________________________________________

US conducts new airstrikes as ISIS kills dozens of Yazidis in Iraq town, officials say

By Fox News.

The U.S. military conducted new airstrikes against Islamic militants Friday as sources tell Fox News members of the group killed at least 90 male members of Iraq’s Yazidi minority in a northern village and kidnapped “dozens” of women and children.

A senior U.S. defense official told Fox News that U.S. surveillance drones saw evidence of the massacre of dozens of Yazidi men. The U.S. military later struck two militant targets, killing some of those involved in the killings, the source said.

The U.S. military said in a statement Friday that the U.S. forces conducted the airstrikes on Islamic State vehicles in the village of Kawju. The village is located south of the village of Sinjar.

The Yazidis, a Kurdish-speaking ethnic and religious group which numbers in the hundreds of thousands in Iraq, has been persecuted in the north by Islamic State militants, with at least 500 killed prior to Friday’s news, according to Iraq’s human rights minister.

Sources told Fox News it appears residents in the village did not comply with the militants’ demands to convert to Islam.

Read more from this story HERE.