Watch: Iranian People Give Their Opinions on Donald Trump

Trump International Hotel Washington, D.C Groundbreaking CeremonyCNN recently asked everyday people in Tehran, Iran, their opinions on Republican presidential candidates Donald Trump, Jeb Bush, Carly Fiorina and Ben Carson (video below).

In the second GOP debate, there was plenty of bad-mouthing Iran, opposition to the nuclear treaty and threats of military action against the Middle East country.

All of the Iranians recognized Trump’s picture, and most had negative comments.

One woman didn’t like Trump’s physical features, while a second woman added, “Yes, I know. I don’t like him. He doesn’t care about the poor people.”

The second woman was shown a picture of Bush and exclaimed, “Oh my god! His father and his brother did a big mess.” (Read more from “Iranian People Give Their Opinions on Donald Trump” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Donald Trump Mocked Immediately in Opening Monologue at Emmy’s

donald-trump-freaks-out-on-twitter-after-obama-wins-election-57619f91a5It took about five minutes for Donald Trump to be mentioned during the 67th Primetime Emmy Awards on Sunday night.

Host Andy Samberg took a shot at the GOP presidential frontrunner during his opening monologue.

“Donald Trump is running for president — to the delight of uncles everywhere,” Samberg joked . . .

Trump was also zinged by Julia Louis Dreyfus during her acceptance speech after winning Best Actress in a Comedy Series.

“What a great honor it must be for you to honor me tonight. I’m so sorry. Donald Trump said that,” Dreyfus said. “It’s getting trickier and trickier to satirize this stuff.” (Read more from “Donald Trump Mocked Immediately in Opening Monologue at Emmy’s” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Twitter Users: FBI Says Everything You Retweet Can Be Used as Evidence in Criminal Investigations [+video]

EIpgSD2KWith social media becoming so ubiquitous so quickly, it can be difficult to figure out what online silliness is fleeting and what can have real-world consequences. When it comes to Twitter, it seems it’s not just what you write that you have to worry about.

In the trial of 22-year-old Ali Saleh of Queens, the FBI is using his retweets of pro Islamic State messages against him.

“The FBI has been using retweets as evidence against Twitter-happy ISIS wannabes in other cases, as well. This summer a 17-year-old Virginia resident was arrested after regularly retweeting fawning statements about ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. So this is a tactic,” Kate Knibbs from Gizmodo writes. In Mississippi, two people were arrested for attempting to go to Syria to join the terror group again citing Twitter as evidence.

This is very troubling, because the implication is that, if convicted, this will establish a precedent that says what you share on social media can, in fact, be used against you. It also raises some pretty serious questions. (Read more from “Twitter Users: FBI Says Everything You Retweet Can Be Used as Evidence in Criminal Investigations” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

New York School Board Meeting Gets Heated During Debate Over Closing for Muslim Holiday

121026065304-jakarta-eid-story-topA Jersey City school board meeting Thursday to vote on whether to close for the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha on Sept. 24 turned contentious before the board ultimately decided not to close schools next week.

The Jersey City Board of Education had originally proposed to close schools next Thursday so that Muslim students could observe the holiday, and the City Council unanimously supported it a week ago. The academic year would have extended one day to June 23, 2016 as a result.

But during the nearly four hours of debate at the board meeting Thursday, some of the Jewish faith said they felt they were being discriminated against because they weren’t getting their own school days off for holidays like Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur . . .

As the debate wore on and it became clear that the school board would not close schools next Thursday, Muslim community members nearly walked out in anger and frustration . . .

In the original resolution announcing the vote, the board said it was “committed to honoring the great diversity of our district, including our religious diversity,” and that it will “continue to engage our communities to explore ways to support its diverse communities and celebrate our many cultures and faiths.” (Read more from “New York Chool Board Meeting Gets Heated During Debate Over Closing for Muslim Holiday” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Ohio Factory Worker Fired for Recommending Faith-Based Film to Homosexual Co-Worker

Audacity-movieProducers of the recently-released faith-based film Audacity were contacted last week by Chris Routson of Middletown, Ohio, who wanted to share with them his story of recommending the film to two lesbian co-workers and subsequently being fired after 13 years as a well-regarded employee.

“I have had good reviews from my supervisors for the past 13 years at my job, and I have always been outspoken about my faith to other employees and have never had any problems up until the last week of my employment,” Routson said.

Routson was told that he was terminated not because of his faith, but for making his co-workers “uncomfortable.” He was first told to stop doing this after he friended one of his lesbian co-workers on Facebook, and recommended the film Audacity to her on his own time from home.

She didn’t seem bothered by this, but the next day Routson was informed he had made a co-worker uncomfortable and he was to stop. He said that he couldn’t stop sharing his faith, and his supervisors said it wasn’t about his faith, just about making co-workers “uncomfortable.”

Two days later, Routson shared his personal testimony with a different co-worker, telling her “Every new person I meet I want to share the gospel with them and if they still want to be my friend then I have gained a friend.” (Read more from “Ohio Factory Worker Fired for Recommending Faith-Based Film to Homosexual Co-Worker” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Imam Tells Muslim Migrants to ‘Breed Children’ With Europeans to ‘Conquer Their Countries’ [+video]

2C792D1B00000578-0-image-m-28_1442594495495A top Iman has told Muslims to use the migrant crisis to breed with European citizens and ‘conquer their countries’.

Sheikh Muhammad Ayed gave the speech at the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem claiming Europe was only welcoming refugees as a new source of labour.

He said Europe was facing a demographic disaster and urged Muslims to have children with westerners so they could ‘trample them underfoot, Allah willing.’

‘Throughout Europe, all the hearts are enthused with hatred toward Muslims. They wish that we were dead, but they have lost their fertility, so they look for fertility in our midst,’ Infowars reports.

‘We will give them fertility. We will breed children with them, because we shall conquer their countries.’ (Read more from “Imam Tells Muslim Migrants to ‘Breed Children’ With Europeans to ‘Conquer Their Countries'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

The Legitimacy of Government Has Cracked

Battle_of_Guiliford_Courthouse_15_March_1781Alaska’s prolife legislative majority took the mistaken action of accepting case law in regards to “medically necessary” abortions, and as predicted, wasted their time parsing through it in order to discern a tiny opening and a moral lifeline to grab, through statutory law.

The “hierarchy of law” is an ancient concept that some laws are more important than others. In our rancorous and increasingly nonsensical political climate, everyone accepts this idea. Just which laws are more important than others is where the argument exists.

In order of priority, once upon a time, natural law reigned supreme, followed by constitutional law, statutory law, common law and, way down at the bottom, case law.

Long ago, through a drawn-out process that was aided by cowardice, ignorance, ambition and pride, the legislative and executive branches of government, on both the state and federal level, abdicated the field of battle in our political wars to the judiciary, which creates case law. You may have read it was never meant to be this way. There were remedies to this usurpation, but they were only seldom exercised.

What is worse, the existence of natural law (inherently placed in the heart of man), and common law (unwritten laws of tradition), have been expunged completely from the cultural debate; constitutional law has been allowed to morph into “whatever the judiciary says it is”; statutory law has been permitted only if the judiciary likes it; and case law, the body of opinion that the judiciary creates by applying the other laws, has been elevated to god-like status.

It has trumped the laws that actually were God-given to us, on Mt. Sinai.

Law schools don’t like to do much else except have the students study case law, case law, case law. Ask any lawyer. Case laws are thick, heavily foot-noted, buried deep in the judicial archives, and are understood only by the lawyer class — which, of course, includes judges, who take the thread of a decision and expand meanings, definitions and applications … and are only understood by the lawyer class.

Indeed, the lawyer jokes that we, and even lawyers, love to tell are based upon this dimly understood but universally sensed fact.

The legitimacy of government has cracked in our society. It is through, finished, wiped out, and you could point to Roe v. Wade as the starting point, but there are many others further back that are equally, if more subtly, significant.

Case law has been maintained only by the desire for the coherence of a public and political order at the expense of a moral one. Yet order and coherence itself are destroyed by such “laws”, even if not immediately recognized.

A moral society really is not the business of government. That belongs to religion, which has demoted itself out of the cultural debate, except in things the government likes. A significant reason for this is socialism, where morality and charity, long the universe of religion, has been turned over to government, with compliant clergy cheerleading the way.

A political answer through statutory law, nullification, impeachment or even secession, are constitutional and political remedies that can be sustained only by a culture that understands the natural and constitutional law, yet when was the last time you heard natural law preached from any pulpit? Or constitutional law properly explained at any institutional level?

Well, at this writing, it appears that Tennessee is going to give it a try.

In his best-selling book Nullification, Thomas Woods had predicted this would happen: that states would begin to awaken to the fact that the entire system of Judicial Activism has no foundation in the Constitution, but rather relies upon 1) the judiciary’s own encroachment, 2) the legislative, executive and state willingness to permit it, and 3) public Constitutional ignorance, that thinks the system is meant to operate in the way it has.

Several things are bound to happen: 1) the courts will “nullify” the state law; 2) the Lamestream Media will ridicule the Tennessee action as akin to Jim Crow racism; 3) having satisfied their profamily constituency that they did all that they could, the legislature will cave in … MAYBE.

I say “maybe” because, at some point, it’s not going to happen. Just who/what/when/where, I don’t know. But at some point, it will. We study history for a reason. Natural Law can be defied only so long. The audition for “Who Wants to Make History?” is wide open.

It’s not Constitutional rocket science. What it needs is the one thing that makes it all happen: courage.

The Alaska legislature, which had absolutely no problem nullifying potential new federal gun laws, might be hesitant to do so in other things, yet it ought to consider a plethora of court decisions to nullify: starting with Roe v. Wade, Kelo v. New London, Obergefell v. Hodges, etc.

But, what does it take to rouse us from lethargy?

The progressive zeitgeist has forcing us to accept convoluted case law for generations, and we are used to it. Those who resist will be branded, ostracized, arrested, fired, fined, or imprisoned. I’m sure you’ve noticed that these are not future or theoretical events anymore.

And, what’s left? Perhaps, ultimately, execution. Governments do that, you know.

The latest absurd “laws” perpetrated by the lawyer class through the courts, on the state and federal level, have no real remedy other than the evangelization of our culture through religion. Sending messages to our sympathetic government officials, running for office ourselves, or even nullification, will have no effect unless the people understand, accept and are taught the Natural Law. What’s more, most law-makers merely act through the tiny and ever-shrinking windows left open to them by the tyrants.

The Tennessee action is different, but it is going to require allies in other states. My first bet is with Oklahoma, then perhaps Wyoming, Montana … and why not Alaska?

But civil disobedience, and suffering the consequences that result from it, might be what is required. Suffering and evangelization is a slow process, and no one likes that idea, but “slow” also translates into “more permanent”. It involves things that are not gladly performed, such as prayer, penance and sacrifice. It also needs leadership.

We have reached rock bottom, but such a situation has its advantages. To rebuild, we must turn to Faith, and if our shepherds refuse to lead, then the sheep must show them the way.

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Here’s How Many ‘Dislikes’ a Post on Facebook Needs to Be Removed

364f5a8fe6703b4311d1f205293f8815Facebook released new information on its planned integration of a dislike button into user posts [last week] and it will likely be greeted with ambivalence. It appears that the dislike button will not just be for show, but will in fact be functional, effecting any post that reaches a certain threshold of dislikes received. The number being bandied around by Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook developers at the moment is ten dislikes, and receiving ten dislikes on your post will result in Facebook’s algorithms removing the post as being potentially disruptive and upsetting to fellow users.

“Facebook is about connections and bringing people together,” Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg said regarding the upcoming changes, “and creating a space where people can interact in a safe and respectful manner. Occasionally our users are subjected to things that they find upsetting, are objectionable, and violate the community standards. Currently the mechanism we have in place to deal with this issue is the report option and function. It allows us to remove objectionable material, but requires us to maintain a large workforce to process post reports at great expense. It is also both cumbersome and slow. Many inappropriate and hurtful posts can remain up for extended periods of time before a moderator is able to examine the material of the post and remove it if necessary.”

“At the same time that we have this inefficient system of reporting we also have had user requests to integrate a dislike button into user posts for several years”, continued Zuckerberg. “We realized that by combining the two functions, reporting and the existence of a dislike button, that not only could we streamline the removal of objectionable material from Facebook but we could also achieve massive cost savings as the amount of employees needed to monitor and process reports was entirely eliminated. It’s a win for our shareholders as we increase profitability and it’s a win for users who will be able to police the potentially psychologically harmful material they are exposed to in real-time.” (Read more from “Here’s How Many ‘Dislikes’ a Post on Facebook Needs to Be Removed” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Trump Just Gave an Epic Response to Everyone Criticizing Him Over Fan’s ‘Obama Is Muslim’ Comment

donaldtrump61815By Dave Urbanski. Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump replied Saturday to growing criticism over not correcting an audience member’s statement at a rally Thursday that President Obama is a Muslim.

Trump tweeted, “Am I morally obligated to defend the president every time somebody says something bad or controversial about him? I don’t think so!”

(Read more from “Trump Just Gave an Epic Response to Everyone Criticizing Him Over Fan’s ‘Obama Is Muslim’ Comment” HERE)

________________________________________

Trump Says He’s Not ‘Morally Obligated’ to Defend Obama Against Claims

By Eugene Scott. Donald Trump on Saturday said it is not his job to correct supporters’ claims about the President, defending his decision not to take issue with a man who disparaged Muslims and said President Barack Obama is not an American.

Trump did not dispute the man’s allegations made at a town hall event this week, and added that if someone criticized him to Obama, there would be “no chance” the President would come to his defense.

“Am I morally obligated to defend the president every time somebody says something bad or controversial about him? I don’t think so!” he tweeted Saturday morning . . .

He then followed up by saying Obama would not have defended him in the roles were reversed.

(Read more from this story HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

JEB BUSH in a DRESS: Top 9 Fun Facts About Carly Fiorina

12395-6216-Fiorina-lWell, in truth, these are not so much “fun facts” as they are troubling evidence that Carly Fiorina is yet another establishment plant-cum-loser, one of a series employed by the Republican leadership team to diffuse grassroots support of an outside-the-system candidate like Ted Cruz (or, currently, Donald Trump). With Carly’s rise in the polls, due to two solid debate performances, it’s worth examining her track record to determine whether: (a) could actually win a general election; and (b) she would offer good policy solutions as a commander-in-chief.

The answer on both counts is an obvious “no”. Here’s why:

SHE SUPPORTS OPEN BORDERS AND ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

In June of this year, Fiorina stated she is open to legal status for adult illegal immigrants and full citizenship for their children. During her Senate run, she endorsed the California DREAM Act, which grants in-state tuition to illegal immigrants. Furthermore, she recently stated that border walls and fences are not effective at protecting U.S. national sovereignty.

WHILE AT HP, SHE WAS IMPLICATED IN A MAJOR IRANIAN TRADE SCANDAL

During her failed run at the Senate, the former HP CEO received plenty of heat about “hundreds of millions of dollars worth of HP printers that were sold to Iran — despite a U.S. ban on trade with that country”. In 2003 Fiorina had described the Middle East as a “growth region” for the company, with its main distributor there doing $100 million in sales that year alone. Fiorina claimed to be unaware of the illegal sales, which begs the question: what competent CEO would be unaware of a nine-figure revenue stream?

WHILE AT LUCENT, SHE WAS BOOKING MASSIVE FRAUDULENT SALES DEALS

Fiorina ran the telecom giant Lucent as it was imploding, a fact that she was able to conceal until after she’d jumped to HP with over $60 million in performance-based pay. A series of major financial sales wins were announced under Fiorina that turned out to be completely fraudulent. In 1999, for example, Fiorina trumpeted a huge sale of up to $2.1 billion of equipment to a company called PathNet. Problem was, however, that PathNet’s annual revenue was $1.6 million and could little afford such a purchase:

In the giant PathNet deal that Fiorina oversaw, Lucent agreed to fund more than 100% of the company’s equipment purchases, meaning the small company would get both Lucent gear at no money down and extra cash to boot. Yet how could such a loan to PathNet make sense for Lucent, even based on the world as it appeared in the heady days of 1999?

It didn’t make any financial sense. Just after Fiorina’s departure, Lucent revealed that it had written $7 billion of loan deals to customers, many of them unviable startups like PathNet, which itself went bankrupt in 2001. Post-Fiorina, Lucent also collapsed as the nature of her vendor-financing deals became obvious; but she walked away with upwards of $60 million.

FIORINA APPEARS ON A VARIETY OF ‘WORST CEOs OF ALL TIME’ LISTS

Her tenures at both Lucent and HP were complete debacles. HP fired Fiorina in 2005 after she led the company’s acquisition of Compaq for $25 billion — just as the conventional PC business began to die. As John Hawkins astutely observed earlier today, her track record led multiple mainstream observers to list her among the worst CEOs of all time (e.g., CBS News, USA Today, CNBC, and ABC News among others).

FIORINA BELIEVES IN MAN-CAUSED GLOBAL WARMING

In a series of interviews from 2008 (when she campaigned for John McCain) to 2010 (when she unsuccessfully ran for the Senate against Barbara Boxer), Fiorina parroted left wing talking points on carbon credits, wind and solar energy sources, and the damage humans are causing to the planet via global warming. As recently as this year, she asserted that climate change is man-made. During her Senate campaign, she also refused to endorse California’s Proposition 23, which would have suspended the economy-destroying AB32 global warming law.

FIORINA IS AN ADMIRER OF THE GENOCIDAL OTTOMAN EMPIRE

Fiorina has issued many admiring comments regarding the Ottoman Empire, which committed the Armenian genocide.

FIORINA OPPOSES FREE SPEECH WHEN IT OFFENDS MUSLIMS

After the Garland, TX terror attack, Fiorina likened Pamela Geller and her group of free speech advocates to “white supremacists demonstrating” and asserted that free speech is “provocative” when it offends Islamists.

FIORINA LOST HER ONLY GENERAL ELECTION… VERY BADLY

Let’s turn again to John Hawkins to wrap things up for on the matter of whether Fiorina would be a credible candidate in the general election:

After beating [conservative Chuck] DeVore [in the GOP primary] by outspending him more than 3-to1, Fiorina went toe-to-toe with charisma-free Senator Barbara Boxer and got her brains beaten in. Surprise, surprise — Fiorina’s disastrous run at Hewlett Packard turned out to be an anchor around her neck and the fact that she was such a terrible politician that she signed off on bizarre garbage like the Demon Sheep ad (IT APPEARS at 2:26) certainly didn’t help. In a year when Republicans picked up 6 Senate seats, Boxer waltzed to a 10 point victory over Fiorina.

BUT WAIT! THERE’S MORE

In 2010, Erick Erickson offered an excellent summary of Fiorina’s rather bizarre positions including:

Carly’s conservative record was thin to nonexistent, and there were many troubling signs that she held liberal views. From her praise of Jesse Jackson, to her playing the race and gender cards against DeVore, to her support for the Wall Street bailouts, to her qualified support for the Obama stimulus, to her past support for taxation of sales on the Internet, to her waffling on immigration, to her support for Sonia Sotomayor, to her Master’s thesis advocating greater federal control of local education, to her past support for weakening California’s Proposition 13, to her statement to the San Francisco Chronicle editorial board that Roe v. Wade is “a decided issue,” Carly Fiorina’s oft-repeated claim to be a “lifelong conservative” was only plausible in the universe of NRSC staffers who recruited her in the first place.

Executive Summary: there is little reason to believe that Fiorina holds any real conservative views, that she could win a general election, and that she would be a competent chief executive.

I call her “Jeb Bush in a dress”, just another cog in the GOPe machinery designed to sabotage a Cruz or a Trump. (For more from the author of “JEB BUSH in a DRESS: Top 9 Fun Facts About Carly Fiorina” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.