Republican nominee Donald Trump continues his upward climb as Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton falls in a new national poll, published Sunday by private polling firm Morning Consult.
Clinton still leads, but by a small three-point margin of 43 to 40 percent. Seventeen percent of voters report they don’t have an opinion.
Trump was at 37 percent in the Morning Consult poll published in the beginning of August. Clinton is down from the 46 percent she earned in that same poll.
In the most recent head-to-head poll taken by the same polling agency, Clinton enjoyed a six-point national lead, earning 44 percent to Trump’s 38 percent.
Clinton’s favorability rating also dropped; she only has a one point lead on the Republican nominee in the race. Fifty-eight percent of likely voters rated Trump as unfavorable, compared to 57 percent who said the same of Clinton. An earlier Morning Consult poll published last week revealed that 50 percent of likely voters would never support Trump, while 45 percent of likely voters would never vote for Clinton.
Independents are also much closer than they have been in previous polls. Thirty-five percent support Clinton, and 34 percent support Trump. Thirty-one percent remain undecided in the poll.
The latest Morning Consult poll was conducted from Aug. 24-26. The poll surveyed 2,007 registered voters, and carried a margin of error of 2 percentage points in either direction. (For more from the author of “LATEST POLL CONFIRMS: Trump Continues Climb Against Clinton” please click HERE)
At the end of the day, in virtually every poll, the top issues are the economy, jobs, and wages. This is what Americans truly care about. Bread and butter issues. All the social justice worker stuff is low hanging fruit. Man-induced climate change is typically last or next to last. Most of the things Hillary talks about are low ranking issues.
Why? Because it’s rather hard to make the case to keep doing the same things that have left the economy crippled.
We got revised GDP numbers from the Commerce Department on Friday and the economy actually did slightly WORSE than originally estimated. Growth was 1.1 percent in the second quarter of this year and less than 1 percent for the first six months of 2016. The business sector of the economy has sunk recession territory. Profits are srinking (down 2.4 percent last quarter) so how long can the stock market rise?
The consumer is keeping the economy out of negative territory, but that’s only because we are spending more than we are earning.
How long can that go on? About as long as the housing bubble could inflate without bursting.
For years the polls have shown that Americans are hyper-concerned about the economy and job security. That was when the economy was growing at a meek 2 percent. Now at 1 percent, we aren’t just treading water, more families are being plunged underwater.
Where’s all the growth under Obama’s economic policies? At the top.
The Democrats who keep saying how well the economy is doing seem to be living in an alternative universe. And that’s probably because so many of the leftwing pundits and economists live and work in Washington DC, which really is doing just fine – thank you. DC is booming thanks to the tribute taxpayers from real America send each month to the capital. Three of the five wealthiest counties are around DC. That tells you everything about who is getting rich off liberal government expansion policies.
For all the caterwauling from Democrats about the rich getting rich during the George W Bush era, they don’t seem to have the same zeal to attack the Democratic Party policies that are truly helping the rich at the expense of the lower and middle classes. Not too mention policies that simply hurt the lower and middle classes while growing the size of the federal government.
Hillary says that what the economy really needs now is a tax increase. Crazy. A new study by the National Center for Policy Analysis says that Hillary’s economic plan will eventually shave 1 percent off GDP. That would technically sink the economy down to zero growth.
Interestingly, for a woman making so much money off of speeches and such, she refuses to cut a check to the IRS to match the tax increase she wants on “the rich.” For a goodly chunk of “the rich” raising the income tax level will do little, since their money is so often made off of capital gains. Hillary’s would be directly filed as income. Guess she doesn’t want to pay her fair share voluntarily.
Her jobs plan would kill hundreds of thousands of jobs. Her energy plan would likewise kill lots of jobs and increase the cost of living for Americans. The aforementioned tax plan would reduce the GDP by 1%, meaning zero growth. The Obama/Democrat economic policies have created the worst economic recovery of all time. Manufacturing has not come back. Good paying jobs are getting harder and harder to find. Want to flip a burger or pour coffee? Good news. Base level jobs have grown. But, thanks to Obamacare, hours will be tightly controlled.
Trump must hammer Hillary and Obama on these abysmal economic developments. What is needed? Tax cuts. Deregulation. American energy production. Repeal of Obamacare. He should talk about little else if he wants to win.
Sage advice. If Trump wants to win, he needs to spend the bulk of his time talking about the economy, jobs, and wages. All the distractions and personal attacks need to be minimized. And all the gaffes need to be minimized, so that he can get his economic ideas out into public.
You know what else is low hanging fruit? Illegal immigration. The same polls that show things like ‘climate change’ as utterly unimportant when stacked up against real issues also show that dealing with illegal immigration is also not all that important. So, he needs to minimize discussion of illegal immigration, and mostly discuss it in terms of the economy and jobs. Attack Hillary and Democrats on their ideas/policies from an economic point of view. ‘Climate change’? Discuss how this will harm people’s livelyhoods and cost of living. The over the top spending, rising deficit, horrific government debt, out of control regulations. Discuss them, and make them personal to citizens.
Bill Clinton’s advisor had an internal message for his people “The economy, stupid”, which morphed to “it’s the economy, stupid.” Yes. He’s right. People are going to care about what effects them. A second, less know internal saying was “change vs more of the same.” This is what Trump needs to do. The economy and “do people want to continue doing what hasn’t worked?” The primaries are long over. The general election is coming up fast. Hit Hillary and Obama on the subjects that people care about. (For more from the author of “GEE: I Wonder Why Hillary Won’t Talk About the Economy?” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/3177408973_31af61c3ab_b-2.jpg7681024Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-08-28 23:54:332016-08-28 23:54:33GEE: I Wonder Why Hillary Won’t Talk About the Economy?
Obama’s Justice Department is investigating both the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Donald Trump campaign for possible ties to corrupt funding traceable back to Russian Vladimir Putin’s regime. While Trump’s alleged involvement through his campaign manager has been extensively covered by the media, forcing that campaign manager to resign, far less ink has been spilled over Clinton’s extensive connections.
Skolkovo, a research facility known as Russia’s version of Silicon Valley and partially funded by the Russian government, contributed tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state. The Obama administration’s plan was to help Russia create its own version of Silicon Valley. Obama claimed he wanted to “reset” U.S. relations with Russia. Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer revealed that Clinton was behind it, asserting that “no cabinet official in the Obama Administration was more intimately and directly involved in the Russian reset than Hillary Clinton.”
Schweizer published a report in June with the details, entitled From Russia With Money. He found that 17 of the 28 American, European and Russian companies that participated in the Skolkovo initiative were Clinton Foundation donors such as Google and Intel, or sponsored speeches for former President Bill Clinton. Some on the Russian side of the Skolkovo initiative also contributed to the Clinton Foundation.
Clinton’s Campaign Manager, John Podesta, Also Did Quite Well With Russian Money
The FBI warned technology companies to avoid the Skolkovo initiative due to concerns that Russian companies backed by Putin’s government wanted to gain access to “classified, sensitive, and emerging technology” from U.S. tech companies. But undeterred by the warning, Clinton’s campaign manager, John Podesta, went ahead and served on the Skolkovo board representing Joule Energy, a solar company based in the Netherlands.
Two months after Podesta joined the foreign firm (which included senior Russian officials), a $35 million transfer came in from Rusnano, an investment firm founded by Putin. One of the investors in Joule was Hans-Jorg Wyss, a major Clinton Foundation donor. Podesta consulted for a foundation run by him.
Podesta, who formerly served as chief of staff to Bill Clinton, failed to disclose his position on the board of this offshore company in federal financial reports, as appears to be clearly required by law, prompting the FBI investigation. Additionally, while serving in that position he headed the left-wing think tank Center for American Progress, which wrote favorably about the Russian government, apparently in exchange for money secretly funneled to the organization by Russians, according to Schweizer. The organizations in the trail of money have ties to Russian oil and gas companies, which opposed U.S. efforts to explore fracking and natural gas.
How Many Pay-to-Play Schemes are Connected to the Clinton Foundation and the Putin Government?
Schweizer’s report alludes to numerous apparent quid pro quos like this one. “The other senior State Department official involved in the Skolkovo process was Lorraine Hariton,” he writes, “the State Department’s Special Representative for Commercial and Business Affairs. (Hariton served on Hillary Clinton’s National Finance Committee during the 2008 campaign.)”
I have previously covered other similar pay-to-play operations involving Clinton’s revolving door between the state department and the Clinton Foundation. Congressional members are now demanding an investigation into a large transfer of money to the Clinton Foundation made by the Russian owner of Uranium One, which was timed when Clinton gave authorization as secretary of state for him to buy the company.
Trump’s Campaign Manager was Demoted and Resigned After His Russian Ties Were Exposed
Trump has also been criticized for hiring a presidential campaign manager, Paul Manafort, who has ties to funding from the Russian government, specifically, by way of his connection to a former pro-Russian Ukrainian regime. However, Manafort was only in that position for four months, and resigned Friday from the campaign due to the controversy.
In 2012, Manafort and one of his associates helped the Ukrainian organization European Centre for a Modern Ukraine, which included members of then-president Viktor Yanukovych’s ruling party, direct money to Washington firms to lobby Congress for the benefit of Yanukovych. (Yanukovych was eventually forced out due to corruption and fled to Russia.) Like Podesta, Manafort was criticized for failing to notify the Department of Justice as a lobbyist about ties to foreign parties and leaders. Regardless, the FBI has said Manafort is not the target of their investigation.
Podesta Blames the Client
The Podesta Group also represented Centre for a Modern Ukraine. The lobbying firm is now threatening to turn on its own client, issuing this statement,
The firm has retained Caplin & Drysdale as independent, outside legal counsel to determine if we were misled by the Centre for a Modern Ukraine or any other individuals with regard to the Centre’s potential ties to foreign governments or political parties. When the Centre became a client, it certified in writing that “none of the activities of the Centre are directly or indirectly supervised, directed, controlled, financed or subsidized in whole or in part by a government of a foreign country or a foreign political party.” We relied on that certification and advice from counsel in registering and reporting under the Lobbying Disclosure Act rather than the Foreign Agents Registration Act. We will take whatever measures are necessary to address this situation based on Caplin & Drysdale’s review, including possible legal action against the Centre.
It remains to be seen whether Podesta will resign as Clinton’s campaign chair. Unlike Trump, Clinton doesn’t seem to have a problem with her campaign manager’s deals, perhaps because she was heavily involved with the same type of activity herself. Tellingly, Trump replaced Manafort with Breitbart News chief Steve Bannon, who made Schweizer’s Clinton Cash into a documentary. It sends a strong message as to how Trump will treat covert funding from Putin’s government. (For more from the author of “The Trump-Russia Link: Notable. The Hillary-Russia Web: Huge.” please click HERE)
A Bible that an Air Force officer kept on his work desk at Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado has infuriated a group opposed to allowing military members to exercise their faith in public.
WND reported last week that the Air Force removed the Bible from the desk of Maj. Steve Lewis of the 310th Space Wing after a complaint from the Military Religious Freedom Foundation.
The organization claimed the Bible’s presence violated Air Force policy and the U.S. Constitution.
At the time, Mikey Weinstein, president of the group, said, “The 310th ‘Space’ Wing is NOT called the 310th ‘Space For My Personal Proselytizing Christian Bible Shrine’ Wing for a damn good reason” . . .
He immediately lashed out with a letter to the Department of Defense’ inspector general, Glenn Fine, as well as Defense Secretary Ash Carter, Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford Jr., Air Force Secretary Deborah James, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Goldfein and others. (Read more from “Bible at Air Force Base Infuriates Atheist” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/bible-998150_960_720.jpg720960Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-08-27 01:07:182016-08-27 01:07:18Bible at Air Force Base Infuriates Atheist
During a tour through Pennsylvania on Tuesday, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s running mate, made a quick stop for a haircut in Norristown.
Pence was surrounded by reporters and camera crews as he entered Henry Jones’ barbershop.
Yet despite the media fanfare surrounding the incident, the barber had no idea he was cutting the hair of such a high-profile figure.
After Jones finished cutting Pence’s hair, he shook the governor’s hand and said, “Your name was?”
“Mike Pence,” he replied. “I’m the governor of the state of Indiana, and I’m running for vice president of the United States.”
“Go ahead, man. Whoa,” replied the 74-year-old barber with a chuckle. “Vice president? Oh boy.”
“We were just in town doing a rally, campaigning, and heard you were the place to come for a haircut,” said Pence. “You’re very gracious.”
Throughout the haircut, Pence and the elderly barber discussed several issues, including the barber’s 40 years of experience cutting hair, the places Pence frequents in Indiana for his regular haircuts, sports and even married life.
Surprisingly, the one issue Pence did not discuss on the campaign stop was the 2016 election.
“Give me a handshake again,” said Jones toward the end of the event. “This is great. Woo! This is history over here, I’m telling you.”
“We’re hoping to make some history,” replied Pence, before taking a picture with the man and another member of his campaign.
Pence was visiting Pennsylvania on Tuesday while Trump was in Texas for a live town hall with Fox News’ Sean Hannity. (For more from the author of “Barber Has Surprising Reaction When Trump’s Running Mate Stops in for a Haircut” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/16688738525_eaa1ac1c13_b-1.jpg6831024Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-08-27 00:48:042016-08-27 00:48:04Barber Has Surprising Reaction When Trump’s Running Mate Stops in for a Haircut
Only in the 2016 campaign, in a race full of both irony and the unexpected, could you ever hope to see a Republican candidate selling merchandise uniquely targeted to the LGBTQ community — and Donald Trump’s campaign is doing just that.
The GOP presidential nominee recently has tried to reach out to African-American voters.
“Tonight, I’m asking for the vote of every single African-American … who wants to see a better future,” Trump said Aug. 19 during a rally in Michigan. “Look how much African-American communities have suffered under Democratic rule. To those I say the following: What do you have to lose by trying something new like Trump? What do you have to lose?”
Now it seems that he is also looking to gain votes with the gay, lesbian and transgender communities.
The Trump campaign recently began selling “LGBTQ for Trump” shirts on its website.
LGBT Republicans appreciated the gesture. Some took to Twitter to express their approval.
On the official website, he has an "LGBTQ for Trump " shirt.
The real estate mogul has said on numerous occasions that he is the best candidate for the LGBT community.
However, not everyone is convinced that Trump’s statements are anything more than empty words.
One of Trump’s biggest critics in the gay community is Michelangelo Signorile, The Huffington Post’s “queer voices editor-at-large.”
In a recent story, Signorile wrote that “there is absolutely no evidence anywhere of Donald Trump promoting gay ‘rights’ or talking openly about them — except to take them away.”
Trump, however, did make an effort to reach out to LGBT voters at the Republican National Convention.
The GOP nominee invited Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel, who is gay, to speak in Cleveland.
“I am proud to be gay. I am proud to be a Republican. But most of all I am proud to be an American,” Thiel said.
In his own speech, Trump said, “As your president I will do everything in my power to protect our LGBTQ citizens from a hateful foreign ideology … believe me.”
When his remark was met with applause, he said, “And I have to say, as a Republican, it is so nice to hear you cheering for what I just said. Thank you.” (For more from the author of “Trump’s Campaign Begins Selling LGBT Apparel on Website” please click HERE)
The Department of Justice released a new police training video Thursday that demonstrates how to have “respectful, professional, and safe” interactions with members of the transgender community.
The 12-minute video was created with the goal of improving relations between law enforcement and the LGBT community in the hope of reducing cases of alleged discrimination. It presents a range of scenarios that show how officers should respond when they encounter an individual who identifies as transgender.
“When someone’s name or gender on a license is different than what you expect, how do you react? Is this person committing identify theft? Are they a fugitive? Possibly they are just transgender,” Cpl. Evan Baxter of Prince George’s County Sheriff’s Department explains in the clip.
In such instances, police are encouraged to ask the individual, “Do you prefer if I call you ma’am or sir?”
“Hey, I don’t have to be in the room to know what just happened. Someone snickered, laughed or made a joke,” the narrator addresses viewers after “Scenario 1” in the video. “Trust me, I know; I’m a cop, too. As police officers, we use humor to deal with things that make us feel uncomfortable or afraid […] To outsiders, it’s perceived as unprofessional and disrespectful.”
A subsequent scenario in the video demonstrates what an officer should do in cases involving a transgender person using a restroom that corresponds to the opposite sex. In the video, a mother with a baby calls 911 after encountering a man in the woman’s restroom.
“I was in the restroom but I’m a woman,” the man tells the officer. The officer then apologizes and leaves with no further questions asked.
The clip stresses the importance of remaining courteous and keeping questions relevant to the situation in question.
“Transgender Americans, like all Americans, deserve to be treated with courtesy and respect by law enforcement officers,” Paul Monteiro, acting director of the Justice Department’s Community Relations Service said in a press release. “The information provided in this video will help strengthen the relationship between police and the transgender community, allowing for more effective investigations and safer encounters for officers and citizens alike.”
Watch:
(For more from the author of “DOJ Releases Video That Teaches Cops How to Interact With Transgender People” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/police-378255_960_720-1.jpg677960Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-08-27 00:04:442016-08-27 00:04:44DOJ Releases Video That Teaches Cops How to Interact With Transgender People
Republicans are often dubbed “the stupid party” because they excel at self-immolation. However, there comes a point when their ability to self-immolate at the perfect time in the most precise fashion is so devastatingly consistent that it’s hard to believe they are not geniuses.
The September congressional session is the final opportunity for Republicans to harness the platform given to them in the 2014 elections – control of both houses of Congress – and utilize it as the closing argument against Obama and Hillary headed into November. With a bleak outlook in the presidential and Senate races, Republicans must use September to change the narrative away from Donald Trump’s personality to a focus on critical issues people care about. They have the FY 2017 budget bill as the perfect vehicle to challenge Obama on his outrageous and dangerous policies, which are opposed by the vast majority of voters.
The opportunities are endless. Republicans could use legislation, floor speeches, committee hearings, and the “must-pass” budget bill to focus attention on Obama’s treasonous alliance with Iran, his plan to increase refugee-intake in October, the collapse of Obamacare, or stopping Obama’s giveaway of internet domains to an international tribunal controlled by Russia, China, and Iran.
Sadly, there are no plans to focus on those issues. What do they plan to focus on instead? Jailbreak legislation. Because, why focus on 80-20 winning issues that are critical to our national security when…you could further cement Obama’s jailbreak legacy?
You heard that right. The closing argument for Republicans this election will be to end the congressional session by consummating Obama’s #1 remaining legacy item of mass jailbreak – all at a time when crime is rising in many major cities for the first time in over two decades and most swing voters in the suburbs are generally concerned about safety and security more than ever before. Haven’t Republicans watched the disaster of California’s Prop 47, which implemented a similar scheme on a state level, and has led to record low arrests and rising crime?
Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis. (F, 53%) and Majority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La. (D, 64%) have spent the entire recess scoring points for Obama by ginning up support on their side for a jailbreak effort in September. Yesterday, Scalise held a meeting with dozens of congressional staffers to plot a strategy and messaging on legislation to cut sentencing for federal prisoners and grant the extremely liberal federal judges more latitude to free prisoners, a prerogative the courts have already grabbed for themselves.
According to my congressional sources familiar with the meeting, leadership aids discussed how to message jailbreak as a conservative initiative, much like they did with the Gang of Eight immigration bill. Although the details are still in flux, staff at the meeting discussed packaging a bunch of “prison reform” bills into one giant bill. Much like the Gang of Eight legislation, they plan to dangle a few conservative talking points embodied in some notional provisions conservatives might like in order to sell the broader pro-criminal tenor of the package as an all-or-nothing proposition. Using the same Orwellian approach of Mark Zuckerberg to allure conservatives into backing amnesty, leadership staff showed a power point presentation selling the effort as being pro law enforcement, enhancing public safety, and supporting victims of crime.
[Several months ago, I published a report debunking all of the “conservative” talking points in support of this effort, which can be viewed here. Also, my analysis about the details of the original Senate bill can be viewed here.]
As always, the political barometer of these people was as uncalibrated as Dick Morris’s political predictions. They evidently feel that suburban voters are about to march on Washington and demand: “give us looser sentencing and prison reform or give us death!” One of the staffers at the meeting fantasized how election-year politics—particularly the impact that passing criminal justice ‘reform’ will have on “independents and folks like that”—will somehow benefit Republicans in the election.
At one point the staff indicated that the Chairman’s bill is actually a step in the right direction for fighting drug trafficking because of the heroin/fentanyl provisions—regardless of the fact that the bill reduces penalties for all heroin traffickers across the board and makes them retroactive. Also, according to my sources, there was no discussion of the fact that their legislation reduces sentences for illegal alien drug traffickers, lets them out early and does nothing to ensure they’re deported.
During a discussion about the number of federal felons who would be released, staffers conceded that “we don’t know exactly how many offenders are eligible” under the House Judiciary Committee bill. This, at a time when Obama is already commuting a record number of sentences and the U.S. Sentencing Commission is already planning early release for up to 46,000 drug traffickers. To begin with, there are only 165,000 prisoners actually housed in federal prisons (roughly 40,000 more are federal inmates in other facilities), and only about half of those were convicted for drug offenses. Further, a large percentage of them are illegal aliens and should be deported. For Congress to exacerbate this with further legislation at this time in history defies common sense.
So where is this emergency coming from? What happened to the emergency over America’s sovereignty, security, refugees, Obamacare, and Iran?
Follow the money. When George Soros and the Koch brothers both want the same thing, you better believe the liberal politicians in both parties will move heaven and earth to get it done. According to recently leaked documents by WikiLeaks, Soros’s Open Society Foundation “remains among the largest contributors of philanthropic dollars to reform strategies specifically targeted to reducing incarceration.” The documents reveal that Soros was concerned the story about Wendell Callahan, who twice benefited from changes in federal sentencing guidelines and upon his release murdered three people in Columbus, would hurt their PR effort.
They also named the Koch brothers as a big backer of the effort. The Koch brothers have gone full-throated Obama for the pro-criminal agenda.
This is just one more example of why the Republican Party is broken on such a systemic level that there is no way to fix it through conventional means. Instead of using all of their political capital to fight the other side’s agenda with equal and opposing force, they use their resources to give voice and cover for some of the worst and most unpopular policies of the Left…in the middle of a big election. Heck, with the party nominee now backing amnesty, they should just spend September passing the Gang of Eight bill.
Once the dust has settled from this election on November 9, it will become abundantly clear that conservatives must look beyond the Republican Party once and for all. (For more from the author of “What Are Republicans Planning to Make Their End-Of-The-Year Focus? Fulfilling Obama’s Jailbreak Agenda” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/jail-831270_960_720.jpg720960Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-08-26 23:53:012016-08-27 01:26:48What Are Republicans Planning to Make Their End-Of-The-Year Focus? Fulfilling Obama’s Jailbreak Agenda
An American hostage held by ISIS for 18 months who died in captivity is being remembered as a woman of courage and compassion who even defended her Christian faith to the executioner known as “Jihadi John” . . .
“My name is Kayla Mueller. I need your help,” an exhausted Mueller said in a “proof of life” video. “I’ve been here too long, and I’ve been very sick, and it’s very terrifying here.”
The 25-year-old endured torture, rape, verbal abuse, and slave labor at the hands of ISIS, but her fellow hostages tell ABC News she never gave up hope and put the needs of other hostages above her own . . .
A former hostage from Denmark, Daniel Rye, told ABC News how Mueller stood up to one of her captors.
“One of the Beatles started to say, ‘Oh, this is Kayla and she has been held all by herself. And she is much stronger than you guys. And she’s much smarter. She converted to Islam.’ And then she was like, ‘No, I didn’t,'” Rye said. (Read more from “American Hostage Kayla Mueller Remembered for Defending Her Faith Before ISIS” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/17141688586_4731d2f5af_b.jpg6831024Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-08-26 22:52:552016-08-27 00:57:30American Hostage Kayla Mueller Remembered for Defending Her Faith Before ISIS
