When Hillary Clinton was preparing to visit a women’s college in Saudi Arabia, her longtime aide Huma Abedin advised giving a copy of the then-secretary of state’s prepared remarks to Abedin’s mother, the vice dean of the school.
Saleha Abedin replied with a warning not to use “political” terms such as “freedom,” “democracy” and “empowering women,” particularly any mention of women driving, which is forbidden in the Islamic kingdom, according to emails obtained by Judicial Watch through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit and released Thursday.
Saleha Abedin, a member of the Muslim Sisterhood, a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, is a sociology lecturer and vice dean at Dar Al Hekma in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, a school she helped found with Yaseen Abdullah Kadi, a member of the bin Laden family who was designated by the U.S. as a terrorist. She has blamed America for 9/11 and advocated for Islamic law provisions condoning marital rape, child marriage, female genital mutilation, domestic violence, and lashings and stonings for women accused of adultery. Huma worked for her family’s Saudi-sponsored Islamic journal, Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, through at least 2008. She is listed as “assistant editor” in the 2002 issue in which her mother suggested the United States was doomed to be attacked on Sept. 11, 2001, because of “sanctions” it leveled against Iraq and other “injustices” allegedly committed against the Muslim world.
In the email chain, Huma Abedin, who was raised in Saudi Arabia from the time she was 2 years old until she returned to the U.S. for college, advised speechwriter Case Button on Feb. 12, 2010, to have the text of Clinton’s remarks vetted by Saleha Abedin. (Read more from “Huma Abedin’s Mother Censored Hillary’s Saudi Speech” HERE)
While all eyes were on the University of California, Berkeley, Thursday night to see if radical leftists could control their anger over the mere presence of a conservative speaker on campus, it was a gathering in a tiny Iowa town that attracted the attention of one of the left’s key allies – the Council on American-Islamic Relations.
CAIR, which was named an unindicted co-conspirator in a massive terror-financing trial held in 2008, crashed a meeting in Oakland, Iowa – population 1,500 in rural Pottawattamie County.
Why such concern for what’s going on in a place so far off the beaten path?
Actually, it’s not unusual, not in post-Trump America.
CAIR has made it a top priority in the wake of President Trump’s surprising election victory to show up, challenge and cause confusion wherever the truth about Islam is being taught, say experts on the organization. CAIR is worried that a nation under the spell of Barack Obama for eight years may start to wake up to some startling facts and discover that Islam has become the government-favored religion, the only religion Americans are not allowed to criticize. (Read more from “CAIR, Leftist Threaten ‘Muslim Mafia’ Experts” HERE)
Joe Miller was asked this past week to host a nationally syndicated radio program by a network with several hundred stations (see the last two paragraphs for how you can help). The broadcast markets will include New York City, Atlanta, Boston, Seattle, Dallas, Chicago, Phoenix-Prescott, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Las Vegas, Salt Lake City, Nashville, Little Rock-Pine Bluff, Tampa-St. Petersburg-Sarasota, St. Louis, Medford-Klamath Falls, Pittsburgh, Cleveland-Akron, Birmingham- Tuscaloosa, Oklahoma City, Albany-Troy, Knoxville, South Bend, Portland-Auburn, Mobile-Pensacola, Reno, Jackson, Gulfport-Biloxi, Traverse City-Cadillac, South Bend, Champaign-Springfield-Decatur, Rochester, and others.
As many of you know, Joe hosted a radio show in Anchorage after the 2010 race until running again for U.S. Senate in the next cycle. His successful show included prominent guests and hard-core anti-Establishment content, some of which can be heard HERE.
Since running for U.S. Senate, Joe Miller has returned to the practice of law, content with being out of the public eye. But he and Kathleen have always felt called to impact their state and nation for good. We live in turbulent times, with a dominant media controlled almost entirely by forces intent on destroying our Constitutional Republic.
The social media giants – both Facebook and Twitter – as well as Google, have been waging war against Joe and other patriots, trying to kill their efforts to Restore Liberty. If Joe chooses to accept the radio show offer, his message will directly challenge the RINO’s, oligarchs, and others who are enemies of freedom, reaching millions of listeners. Mark Zuckerberg, George Soros, Google execs, and others will be powerless to stop it.
Joe’s program would broadcast throughout the nation, three-hours per day. Like other syndicated hosts, Joe will be responsible for bringing in sponsors for the program. For him to accept and meet costs, he must find sponsors for the show. Full show sponsors would have a live daily read by Joe, potentially reaching millions of listeners. At a minimum, the show requires six full monthly sponsors to move forward. Sponsorships start at $500 per month, with a 12-month commitment. A decision must be made by next Friday. Please contact [email protected] for more information.
If you simply wish to contribute to the radio effort, but not sponsor, please donate HERE, and email [email protected] requesting that the donation be included in the funding for the show. If sufficient funding is not reached, such donations will be dedicated to Restoring Liberty’s ongoing website/Internet efforts. Thank you for joining in the cause to Restore Liberty!
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/Joe-Miller-Tea-Party.jpg413588Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2017-09-15 13:11:482017-09-17 09:45:43Joe Miller Asked to Host Nationally Syndicated Radio Show
While Hillary Clinton is soaking up the media attention from her new book, new revelations have come to light about her mishandling of classified information as secretary of state and the special favors Clinton donors received from the State Department.
Judicial Watch released a blockbuster 1,617 new pages of documents from the U.S. Department of State revealing multiple new instances of classified information being transmitted through top Clinton aide Huma Abedin’s email account, along with several emails revealing how Hillary Clinton donors got special favors from the State Department.
According to Judicial Watch, there are 97 email exchanges with Clinton that were not previously turned over to the State Department — contradicting Clinton’s claims under penalty of perjury that “as far as she knew,” all of her government emails had been turned over to the State Department.
“The emails show ‘what happened’ was that Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin obviously violated laws about the handling of classified information and turned the State Department into a pay for play tool for the corrupt Clinton Foundation,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The clear and mounting evidence of pay for play and mishandling of classified information warrant a serious criminal investigation by an independent Trump Justice Department.”
There are no less than 20 new examples of classified information being transmitted through Abedin’s unsecure, non-government email account. The documents were released in accordance with a court order from a 2015 lawsuit Judicial Watch filed against the State Department seeking “all emails of official State Department business received or sent by former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin from January 1, 2009 through February 1, 2013 using a non-‘state.gov’ email address,” in a Freedom of Information Act request.
Additionally, there are instances of plain sloppiness. On August 18, 2009, Abedin forwarded logins and passwords, a PIN number, and instructions on how to access her email from a secure State Department website to her unsecure email account.
Clinton Foundation officials were given access to Clinton’s daily schedule several times. Judicial Watch highlights how donors also received special favors:
On July 14, 2009, Gordon Griffin, a XL Keystone lobbyist, sent an email to Clinton Foundation executive Doug Band, asking if Band could get him into a Council on Foreign Relations dinner at which Clinton was speaking. Band forwarded the email to Abedin, saying, “Can u get him in?” Abedin replied: “Yes will get him in.” Band was a top aide to President Bill Clinton and co-founder of Teneo. Griffin was a major donor to Hillary Clinton’s Senate and presidential campaigns.
On July 16, 2009, Zachary Schwartz asked Band for help getting visas to travel to Cuba for a film production crew from Shangri La Entertainment. Band forwarded the request to Abedin, telling her, “Please call zach asap on this. [Redacted.] Important.” Abedin responded, “I’ll call zach when we land in India.” Abedin concludes with “Enjoy. Cuba is complicated. Am sure you aren’t surprised to hear that.” Schwartz worked for Steve Bing, a mega-donor to the Clintons and owner of Shangri La Entertainment. Bing has reportedly donated $10-25 million to the Clinton Foundation and paid Bill Clinton personally $2.5 million a year to be an adviser to a green construction company Bing owned.
…
On May 5, 2010, major Clinton Global Initiative member, Clinton Foundation donor and real estate developer Eddie Trump forwarded to “Dougie” Band a request for assistance from Russian American Foundation Vice President Rina Kirshner to get the Russian American Foundation involved in a State Department program. Band forwarded the request to Abedin, saying, “Can we get this done/mtg set.” As Judicial Watch previously reported, the State Department doled out more than $260,000 to the Russian American Foundation for “public diplomacy.”
The White House has recently said that the Department of Justice “should certainly look at” prosecuting former FBI Director James Comey for “improper” and potentially “illegal” behavior.
Will the White House now called for a renewed investigation into Hillary Clinton’s criminal mishandling of classified information and corrupt pay-for-play relationships with Clinton Foundation donors? (For more from the author of “WHOA: Explosive New Clinton Emails Demand Investigation” please click HERE)
Former national security adviser Susan Rice told House Intelligence Committee investigators that she spied on the crown prince of the UAE, and in doing so, unmasked the names of top Trump officials, CNN reported Wednesday.
“Unmasking” is the term used to describe uncovering the names of people (specifically in this case, American citizens) that are gathered as part of foreign surveillance collection efforts. Obama administration officials such as Rice, UN Ambassador Samantha Power, CIA director John Brennan, and others have been accused of unmasking Americans in a manner that neglects proper procedure.
Rice’s explanation for using the highly controversial espionage tactic generates more questions than answers. Her most recent explanation reveals that the Obama administration had a troubling relationship with what is supposed to be one of our Arab allies and also leaves many wondering why she was spying on Americans just one month before leaving office.
What happened to US-UAE relations under the Obama administration?
The United Arab Emirates is a major partner in the U.S. coalition against the Islamic State and is commonly seen as a crucial ally in the larger war against global jihadism. The small Gulf nation hosts some 3,500 American military personnel at its Al Dhafra Air Base.
Susan Rice’s decision to spy on a prominent UAE figure reminds us that Team Obama’s foreign policy had a habit of gathering information on countries that are considered close allies and altering long-held alliances, not for the better.
Along with Israel (a major target of the Obama administration’s espionage operations), the UAE fiercely opposed Obama’s controversial nuclear accord with the terrorist regime in Iran. Obama’s embrace of the Islamist Arab Spring was also viewed in Abu Dhabi as a major blunder, one that could have ramifications for its monarchy and the entire Gulf region.
The fact that a top official such as Rice felt the need to spy on an ally instead of simply reaching out and asking about its intentions says all you need to know about how the previous White House alienated the UAE and other allies.
UAE-based papers cheered the election of Donald Trump as U.S. president, not just based on some encouraging foreign policy initiatives that he proposed, but out of glee that the past administration (and its pro-Tehran, pro-Muslim Brotherhood policies) had left power.
There is nothing unusual about wanting to meet with the incoming administration
Rice claimed that part of the reason for her spying was that it was a mystery why the crown prince of the UAE, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, came to New York during the presidential transition period. To even a casual foreign policy observer, it’s obvious why one of the most influential leaders in the Arab world wanted to meet with Donald Trump during the transition period. Rice’s “explanation” doesn’t pass the smell test.
The UAE is a vital U.S. ally, and it is in the best interests of both nations that its leaders become acquainted prior to transitions in office. There is nothing scandalous about such a visit. Rather, it’s standard protocol.
Two sources privy to the meeting (who chose to remain anonymous for diplomatic reasons) tell Conservative Review that the crown prince’s meeting with Trump advisers last December focused on bolstering the diplomatic relationship and included a dialogue on how to improve counter-terrorism cooperation and regional stability.
Why would the crown prince travel halfway around the world to open up a back channel between the U.S. and Russia?
It takes about 15 hours one-way to travel by air from Dubai to New York. That’s a long trip for an influential monarch with a tight schedule, who would seemingly get nothing substantial out of acting as an unnecessary intermediary between the Trump transition and Russia.
From a practical standpoint, it’s hard to make sense of the speculation in CNN’s report that the meeting was a follow-up to help the incoming Trump administration set up a back channel with Russia.
Trump was one month and a few days away from assuming commander-in-chief duties; he didn’t need an intermediary of any kind. And even if the incoming Trump administration wanted to use the meeting to help facilitate a coming detente with Russia, it’s hardly a reason for the outgoing administration to spy on its political opponents.
Susan Rice was unmasking American citizens a month before leaving office
It is widely understood that the authority to unmask the names of American citizens should only be used in extreme circumstances particularly vital to our national security. But the casual use by Rice (and according to reports, many other Obama White House officials) has led experts to entertain the possibility that she was instead engaged in Watergate-level political espionage.
Rice lied on national television. Should we believe her now?
In April, Susan Rice appeared on MSNBC with Andrea Mitchell and wholly denied she knew anything regarding the unmasking of Trump officials.
“I know nothing about this,” Rice said. “I was surprised to see reports from [House Intelligence Committee] Chairman [Devin] Nunes on that count today … So today, I really don’t know to what Chairman Nunes was referring. But he said that whatever he was referring to was a legal, lawful surveillance and that it was potentially incidental collection on American citizens.”
It turns out that Rice knew exactly what was going on, as evidenced by her testimony provided in the CNN report.
This is the same person who appeared on every cable news show and repeatedly called the Benghazi attacks a “spontaneous reaction” to a “hateful and offensive” YouTube video, when nothing could be further from the truth.
The Obama White House national security adviser had a history of lying to the American public. Why should congressional investigators believe Rice now? (for more from the author of “Susan Rice’s Unmasking Lies and How Obama Torched a US Ally” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/the-obamas-potus-1.jpg536800Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2017-09-14 23:56:532017-09-14 23:56:53Susan Rice’s Unmasking Lies and How Obama Torched a US Ally
Last year, President Trump promised that the days of people coming here illegally to get citizenship are over. Well, now those days are only beginning and will continue in perpetuity. Trump is in the process of building an open border, and the American citizen will pay for it in the form of crime, welfare, education, health care, and a permanent Democrat majority in Texas, Arizona, and Florida.
After selling us out, not just last night with his Pelosi meeting but for the past two weeks of messaging on immigration, Trump is now trying to repair his status with the base on Twitter. After all, Twitter has become his go-to forum to hide his true policy outcomes and keep the base happy with political morphine. Yet his defensive statements are even more offensive to conservatives than the original reports.
Does anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military? Really!…..
There are no words to describe how offensive these pathetic straw-men talking points have been to conservatives for over a decade. We’ve been fighting this false narrative for years, and Trump was elected precisely because people were tired of Jeb Bush acolytes suggesting illegal aliens, on net, are better than Americans and not a fiscal, cultural, and security drain on America.
Within just a few months, Trump has not only adopted the policies of the Left, he has mastered their parlance, focus, false dichotomies, perverted sense of priorities, and straw-men arguments with a downright eerie degree of precision.
Then Trump reportedly said the following when asked about amnesty:
Trump just now: "We are not looking at citizenship. We are not looking at amnesty. We are looking at allowing people to stay here."
So Trump is now glorifying and idealizing DACA, a term that should be a four-letter word — the embodiment of America-last unconstitutional governance — as a legitimate baseline from which to craft policy. But there is an even bigger lie that will be propagated in the coming weeks.
Proponents of amnesty employ a stratagem whereby their broad messaging portends endless open borders and amnesty, but in order to get conservatives to support specific proposals, they try to isolate and minimize a small population. And of course, they tell us this small population, who should be allowed to stay and be given a path to citizenship, are all military veterans and superheroes. Trump will contend that this is only 800,000 people, but that is not what Democrats plan to pursue and that is not what will naturally flow from any amnesty. By definition, any amnesty, as history has shown, creates the conditions for broader amnesty, permanent open borders, halting of enforcement, immigration lawfare, and chain migration that is set irretrievably in motion by the original “sympathetic” amnesty.
Consider the following:
According to the Migration Policy Institute, the 2017 Senate version of the so-called Dream Act (Graham-Durbin) would grant 1.5 million immediate eligibility for green cards and another 1.8 million “conditional” status, which we all know would politically and legally turn into citizenship in short order. That is a total of 3.3 million.
Now remember, we didn’t even get to the kids yet. The “dreamers” are largely in their 20s and 30s. Immediately after securing their amnesty, the Left will come back and say: How can you then not give amnesty to all those who came after 2007 and are just children? That is approximately another million individuals, not including many of the recent (and continuous) arrivals from Central America.
How can you deport the parents of U.S. citizens? Hence, DACA engenders DAPA. According to the Migration Policy Institute, this includes roughly 3.6 million. And remember, since we refuse to even negotiate changes to birthright citizenship for illegals, more and more of the illegal immigrant population will have children here and become recipients of the inevitable amnesty for the parents. They are also immediately eligible for welfare on behalf of that child. Robert Rector estimated that this population alone would cost us $2 trillion. Including “dreamers,” we are now at easily over 7 million people eligible for the amnesty.
Now consider the following electoral dynamic playing out over the next 10 years. Democrats are already on a positive trajectory thanks to years of amnesty and open borders. But the same thing that happened to California after the 1986 amnesty will now happen in many other states, including Texas, Arizona, and Florida. There are an estimated 260,000 “dreamers” in Texas, as well as 559,000 eligible for DAPA. That is a total of 820,000 new voters over time, even before discussing chain migration. That is greater than the 807,000 margin of victory for Trump in Texas last year. The margin of victory in Arizona and Florida was close to 100,000 in each state, easily overwhelmed by any iteration of amnesty and citizenship.
But we’re just getting started. According to Jessica Vaughn’s analysis of chain migration, immigrants on average bring in 3.45 family members over their lifetime. Mexican nationals, who will be the overwhelming recipients of amnesty, have the highest rate of chain migration, topping out at 6.38 additional immigrants per person. At this point, we don’t need to analyze states like Texas any more. We’ll be talking about turning Wyoming blue.
Not only will the promise of amnesty cause a surge at the border, but many individuals will come on visas and overstay. We have no visa tracking in place. This will create a permanent cycle of no enforcement. It will be virtually impossible to decipher all the new illegal immigrants from the plethora of those eligible for legal status, thereby in practice halting all deportations. Even under current law, which is iron-clad, courts are blocking huge numbers of deportations, even of criminal aliens. Once we write a new amnesty statute, everyone will potentially be given the opportunity to present their case as to why they are a “dreamer” too. Thus, Trump can tout the limitations all he wants, but the lawfare and fraud behind litigating every last person into the criterion will grind enforcement to a halt.
The bottom line with amnesty is that it never works and never will work. It always leads to nothing but more and more illegal immigration and more and more amnesty. It can never work until all the enforcement measures are implemented years in advance.
Ironically, none other than Marco Rubio presciently warned about this lax attitude toward enforcement when he was running for Senate in 2009, before he betrayed his own campaign promise:
“If you grant amnesty, the message that you’re sending is that if you come in this country and stay here long enough, we will let you stay. And no one will ever come through the legal process if you do that.”
Then again, the MAGA man himself put it best during the Gang of 8 debate:
Amnesty is suicide for Republicans.Not one of those 12 million who broke our laws will vote Republican.Obama is laughing at @GOP.
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/29782768073_fcbe1dda59_b.jpg5761024Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2017-09-14 23:52:102017-09-14 23:52:10Trump’s GOP Amnesty Will Bring in Millions of … Democrat Voters
A West Virginia high school football program that received national attention last year after its county was one of many devastated by historic flooding is once again in the national spotlight.
As WSAZ-TV reported, last football season one person complained about Clay County High School’s longstanding tradition of having the Lord’s Prayer be read aloud before football games.
This complaint resulted in Clay County school leaders banning the act altogether and instead implementing a new rule that would allow for a moment of silence during which players and fans would be allowed to use the time as they please.
The players from both Clay County and opposing Braxton County made sure to use that time to exercise their God-given right.
Before the game began, players, coaches and cheerleaders from both teams met at midfield to recite the prayer — not as rivals or adversaries, but as one.
People in the stands joined in as well.
The prayer has become closely associated with football, as it is often a staple of pregame rituals for many football teams from youth leagues to the pros.
“This is a situation that is unfortunately out of our hands,” said Clay County Schools Superintendent Joe Paxton. “The U.S. Supreme Court is the supreme law of the land.”
Paxton was referencing the district’s decision to ban the prayer because of the 1962 Supreme Court decision that barred prayer at school.
In an act of defiance, many fans arrived to the stadium wearing shirts that read, “I’m gonna pray anyway.”
Clay County High School Principal Crystal Gibson insisted that she, like many others in the stands, would be praying during the moment of silence.
“During that moment of silence, if anyone wishes to pray, by all means I wish that they would,” Gibson said. “That’s their right to do so and I’ll be doing so at that same time.” (For more from the author of “School Board Bans Pre-Game Prayer but Players Find a Way” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/praying-hands-1379173656P80-2.jpg12711920Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2017-09-14 23:44:512017-09-14 23:44:51School Board Bans Pre-Game Prayer but Players Find a Way
Hours after North Korea threatened to use nuclear weapons to “sink” Japan and reduce the United States “to ashes and darkness,” it launched a missile early Friday morning from Pyongyang, the nation’s capital, that flew eastward over the Sea of Japan.
BREAKING: North Korea fires missile over Hokkaido at 7:06 a.m.: Tokyo
Initial reports via Twitter said the missile “fell into the Pacific Ocean about 2,000 km to the east off Hokkaido.”
The BBC reported that as soon as news of the launch was released, Japan advised its residents to take shelter. A previous North Korean missile test overflew the Japanese island of Hokkaido.
Citizens were advised “to take shelter in buildings, or underground, stay away from windows,” according to one report.
The launch followed an inflammatory statement from the Korea Asia-Pacific Peace Committee that called for the breakup of the United Nations Security Council, which it called “a tool of evil” made up of “money-bribed” countries that move at the order of the United States.
“The four islands of the archipelago should be sunken into the sea by the nuclear bomb of (the regime). Japan is no longer needed to exist near us,” the committee said in a statement.
North Korea also directly vilified the U.S.
“The army and people of the DPRK are unanimously demanding that the Yankees be beaten to death as a stick is fit for a rabid dog. Now is the time to annihilate the U.S. imperialist aggressors,” the statement said, using the acronym for North Korea’s official name, The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.
“Let’s reduce the U.S. mainland into ashes and darkness. Let’s vent our spite with mobilization of all retaliation means which have been prepared till now,” the statement said.
South Korea was also mentioned as a target.
“South Korean puppet forces are traitors and dogs of the U.S. The group of pro-American traitors should be severely punished and wiped out with fire,” the North Korean statement said. (For more from the author of “Japanese Take Cover as North Korea Fires Missile Near Japan” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/1280px-War_flag_of_the_Imperial_Japanese_Army.svg_.png8531280Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2017-09-14 23:40:482017-09-14 23:40:48Japanese Take Cover as North Korea Fires Missile Near Japan
Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer was overheard Thursday discussing President Donald Trump with some of his aides.
“He likes us. He likes me, anyway,” Schumer was heard saying on the Senate floor by a nearby CSPAN microphone.
The CSPAN video containing the comments only showed the front of the Senate floor, making it unclear who Schumer was speaking to at the time.
Schumer’s comments were in response to a dinner he had with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Wednesday night at the White House with Trump.
“Here’s what I told him: ‘Mr. President, you are much better off sometimes stepping right and sometimes step left. You have to step just in one direction, you’re boxed,’” Schumer said.
Schumer’s remarks were in reference to Trump holding meetings recently with congressional leaders to find a bipartisan solution to the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.
“He gets that. We are always going to work it out, and it will make us more productive too,” Schumer said.
Several conflicting reports have been issued since Trump met with Pelosi and Schumer Wednesday night to discuss immigration reform.
In a joint statement Wednesday night following their meeting, Pelosi and Schumer said Trump had agreed to support legislation keeping DACA in place without receiving guaranteed funding for the border wall in exchange.
Reports suggested that they had reached an agreement to pass DACA legislatively and only enhance border security measures without a border wall along the southern border between the U.S. and Mexico.
Prior to leaving for Florida Thursday to examine the aftermath of Hurricane Irma, Trump told reporters that he may accept increased border security measures rather than immediate funding for the wall.
“The wall will come later,” Trump said.
“We’re right now renovating large sections of wall, massive sections, making it brand new,” Trump said. “We’re doing a lot of renovations, we’re building four different samples of the wall to see which one we’re going to choose, and the wall is going to be built, it will be funded a little bit later.”
Trump sent out a series of tweets Thursday morning saying that no deal had been agreed to during the meeting.
No deal was made last night on DACA. Massive border security would have to be agreed to in exchange for consent. Would be subject to vote.
“Does anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military?” he tweeted.
He continued: “They have been in our country for many years through no fault of their own – brought in by parents at young age. Plus BIG border security.” (For more from the author of “Chuck Schumer Caught on Hot-Mic Making Comment About Trump” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/17168411315_3f2ee082d4_b.jpg5761024Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2017-09-14 23:35:072017-09-14 23:36:14Chuck Schumer Caught on Hot-Mic Making Comment About Trump
A CIA whistleblower, Kevin Shipp, has emerged from the wolves den to expose the deep state and the shadow government which he calls two entirely separate entities.
“The shadow government controls the deep state and manipulates our elected government behind the scenes,” Shipp warned in a recent talk at a Geoengineeringwatch.org conference.
Shipp had a series of slides explaining how the deep state and shadow government functions as well as the horrific crimes they are committing against U.S. citizens.
Some of the revelations the former CIA anti-terrorism counter intelligence officer revealed included that “Google Earth was set up through the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency and InQtel.” Indeed he is correct, the CIA and NGA owned the company Google acquired, Keyhole Inc., paying an undisclosed sum for the company to turn its tech into what we now know as Google Earth. Another curious investor in Keyhole Inc. was none other than the venture capital firm In-Q-Tel run by the CIA according to a press release at the time.
Shipp also disclosed that the agency known as the Joint Special Ops Command (JSOC) is the “president’s secret army” which he can use for secret assassinations, overturning governments and things the American people don’t know about.
FBI warrantless searches violate the Fourth Amendment with national security letters, which Shipp noted enables them to walk into your employer’s office and demand all your financial records and if he or she says anything about them being there they can put your supervisor in jail or drop a case against themselves using the “State’s Secret Privilege law.”
“The top of the shadow government is the National Security Agency and the Central Intelligence Agency,” Shipp said.
Shipp expressed that the CIA was created through the Council on Foreign relations with no congressional approval, and historically the CFR is also tied into the mainstream media (MSM.) He elaborated that the CIA was the “central node” of the shadow government and controlled all of other 16 intelligence agencies despite the existence of the DNI. The agency also controls defense and intelligence contractors, can manipulate the president and political decisions, has the power to start wars, torture, initiate coups, and commit false flag attacks he said.
As Shipp stated, the CIA was created through executive order by then President Harry Truman by the signing of the National Security Act of 1947.
According to Shipp, the deep state is comprised of the military industrial complex, intelligence contractors, defense contractors, MIC lobbyist, Wall St (offshore accounts), Federal Reserve, IMF/World Bank, Treasury, Foreign lobbyists, and Central Banks.
In the shocking, explosive presentation, Shipp went on to express that there are “over 10,000 secret sites in the U.S.” that formed after 9/11. There are “1,291 secret government agencies, 1,931 large private corporations and over 4,800,000 Americans that he knows of who have a secrecy clearance, and 854,000 who have Top Secret clearance, explaining they signed their lives away bound by an agreement.
He also detailed how Congress is owned by the Military Industrial Complex through the Congressional Armed Services Committee (48 senior members of Congress) giving those members money in return for a vote on the spending bill for the military and intelligence budget.
He even touched on what he called the “secret intelligence industrial complex,” which he called the center of the shadow government including the CIA, NSA, NRO, and NGA.
Shipp further stated that around the “secret intelligence industrial complex” you have the big five conglomerate of intelligence contractors – Leidos Holdings, CSRA, CACI, SAIC, and Booz Allen Hamilton. He noted that the work they do is “top secret and unreported.”
The whistleblower remarked that these intelligence contractors are accountable to no one including Congress, echoing the words of Senator Daniel Inouye when he himself blew the whistle on the shadow government during the Iran-Contra hearings in 1987.
At the time Inouye expressed that the “shadow government had its own funding mechanism, shadowy Navy, and Air Force freedom to pursue its own goals free from all checks and balances and free from the law itself.”
Shipp further added that the shadow government and elected government were in the midst of a visible cold war.
So who is Shipp and is he credible as a whistleblower, does he have credentials for the CIA? Aim.org wrote:
Shipp held several high-level positions in the CIA. He was assigned as a protective agent for the Director of Central Intelligence, a counterintelligence investigator, a Counter Terrorism Center officer, a team leader protecting sensitive CIA assets from assassination, a manager of high-risk protective operations, a lead instructor for members of allied governments, an internal staff security investigator, and a polygraph examiner. He was tasked with protecting the CIA from foreign agent penetration and the chief of training for the CIA federal police force. Mr. Shipp functioned as program manager for the Department of State, Diplomatic Security, and Anti Terrorism Assistance global police training program. He is the recipient of two CIA Meritorious Unit Citations, three Exceptional Performance Awards and a Medallion for overseas covert operations. He is the author of From the Company of Shadows–CIA Operations and the War on Terrorism.
Shipp noted he was working with former NSA whistleblower William Binney but didn’t state what the two were working on together. Shipp is highly credible and may just be the highest level whistleblower. This leak is huge. He has been previously mentioned in the New York Times for blowing the whistle on the mistreatment of him and his family when they were put in a mold-contaminated home. He is also mentioned in a WikiLeaks cable during the GiFiles that I was able to dig up. Is this the beginning of whistleblowers coming forward to end the shadow government and deep state? You can watch Shipp’s full explosive presentation below.
(For more from the author of “High Ranking CIA Agent Blows Whistle on the Deep State and Shadow Government” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/Cia-lobby-seal-3.jpg428533Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2017-09-14 23:30:282017-09-16 22:09:59High Ranking CIA Agent Blows Whistle on the Deep State and Shadow Government
