A Principal Was Removed, Faced Threats for Making Racist Comments. There’s Just One, Major Problem.

A black ex-employee allegedly used artificial intelligence to frame the white principal of a Baltimore-area high school as a racist and an antisemite, resulting in relentless threats, harassment, and the principal temporarily being removed from the school.

Dazhon “DJ” Darien is accused of impersonating Pikesville High School principal Eric Eiswert using AI-generated audio to mimic his voice and make racist, antisemitic statements on a simulated recording that was, then, widely circulated across social media.

“You know, I seriously don’t understand why I have to constantly put up with these dumbasses here every day,” a male voice, purportedly Eiswert’s, says in the 45-second tape. The speaker goes on to gripe about “ungrateful black kids who can’t test their way out of a paper bag” and how hard it is to make sure that these students meet their grade-level academic expectations.

“And if I have to get one more complaint from one more Jew in this community, I’m going to join the other side,” the voice adds.

At one point, the speaker mentions Darien by his nickname, DJ, as an example of staff who “should never have been hired.” (Read more from “A Principal Was Removed, Faced Threats for Making Racist Comments. There’s Just One, Major Problem.” HERE)

How Many More Times Will Joe Biden Mention This at the Podium This Year?

. . .This afternoon, the president delivered remarks about the CHIPS and Science Act at the Milton J. Rubenstein Museum of Science and Technology in Syracuse, New York. And somehow, he decided to thread his son’s death into the mix:

You know, before I start, I want to take a moment to honor two officers who have already been mentioned — two fallen heroes who were killed in the line of duty this month: Lieutenant Michael Hoosock and — County Sheriff Department — and Syracuse Police Officer Michael Jensen.

We pray for their loved ones, whose hearts have been broken. You know, every time a police officer puts on that shield every morning, their husband or wife, whatever it is, their child worries about will they get that phone call — will they get that phone call.

I got one of those phone calls in a different circumstance — find out you’ve lost part of your soul, lost part of your heart.

Ninety-nine percent of that was fine, but where does Beau Biden fit into all this? He could have simply honored the late Lt. Hoosock and Officer Jensen, who were shot and killed earlier this month; that would have been the right thing to do. Instead, Biden grief-peddled again, exploited his son’s death again, and misfired on the empathy play again. Beau died of brain cancer. (Read more from “How Many More Times Will Joe Biden Mention This at the Podium This Year?” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Trump Defense Attorney Fires Crippling Shots at Alvin Bragg’s Case Just Minutes Into Cross-Examination

Former President Donald Trump’s lawyer sought to cast doubt on arguments at the core of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case just minutes into cross-examining the prosecution’s first witness.

Defense attorney Emil Bove questioned former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker about the tabloid’s business practices, pointing out that purchasing stories to keep them from getting out, as he did for Trump, is not unusual for what has been described as the publication’s “checkbook journalism.” The prosecution had previously questioned Pecker on the details of purchasing former playboy model Karen McDougal’s story of an alleged affair with Trump, one of three instances they argue demonstrate an illegal “conspiracy” to influence the 2016 election by Pecker, former Trump attorney Michael Cohen and Trump.

Bove sought to flip the script and demonstrate the McDougal deal was just “standard” procedure. He highlighted multiple instances where Pecker’s magazine suppressed damaging stories for other individuals in the public eye, including for politicians like Rahm Emanuel, current U.S. ambassador to Japan and former Democratic mayor of Chicago, and former Republican California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

He also emphasized that Pecker’s relationship with Trump pre-dated the 2016 election. Pecker had been providing Trump a heads up on potentially negative publicity for over a decade, Bove noted, and Pecker confirmed the first time he did so was in 1998.

Pecker agreed that he ran articles about Trump because it was “good for business.” They had a “mutually beneficial” business relationship: Trump would also tip Pecker off with information about “The Apprentice,” including rating and access to participants. (Read more from “Trump Defense Attorney Fires Crippling Shots at Alvin Bragg’s Case Just Minutes Into Cross-Examination” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Republicans Sound Alarm on Efforts to Shield Ukraine Funding From American Voters

As President Joe Biden signed legislation Wednesday to send billions of dollars more in aid to Ukraine, officials from Brussels to Washington are working to hamstring former President Donald Trump from taking a different route should he win back the White House.

With Congress granting Biden additional “drawdown” authority to send weapons to Kyiv, and NATO allies in Europe seeking to take the power to send aid away from the White House, multiple Senate Republicans, strategists and former Trump officials told the Daily Caller efforts to “Trump-proof” foreign aid are misguided and futile.

“There are things that they’re setting in motion here that are going to make it very difficult for Trump to, if he’s elected president, to undo this, to extricate us, from these arrangements,” Utah Sen. Mike Lee said. “I mean, look there are a thousand things you can do with government contracting that can make it either easier or harder for a subsequent administration to take a different approach.”

Lee is among the lawmakers and officials who opposed the aid package that will send $26.4 billion of funding to Israel, $8.1 billion of funding to Taiwan and $61 billion of more aid to Ukraine. Several of the opponents noted that, in their view, Ukraine is unlikely to prevail in the long-term against Russia and a settlement must be negotiated sooner rather than later.

“The fact is that the strategy isn’t working. There is no strategy,” Fred Fleitz, the vice chair of America First Policy Institute’s Center for American Security said. “And Trump understands that. And it’s just not fair for these Democrats to say, well, we’re going to Trump-proof NATO. We’re going to Trump proof aid for Ukraine.” (Read more from “Republicans Sound Alarm on Efforts to Shield Ukraine Funding From American Voters” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

Chinese Company Appears to Ignore Threat of U.S. Ban, Says It ‘Has No Plans’ to Sell TikTok: Report

According to Toutaio, a news and information content platform that is a core product of the Chinese company ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok, ByteDance has no plans to sell TikTok.

Last weekend, Congress passed a measure that gave ByteDance nine months to sell TikTok or it will be banned in the United States. If a sale is in progress during those nine months, an additional three months would be added. On Wednesday, President Biden signed the measure into law.

“Foreign media reports that ByteDance is exploring the sale of TikTok are untrue. ByteDance has no plans to sell TikTok,” Toutaio stated on Thursday.

TikTok had responded to Biden signing the bill with a statement on X:

This unconstitutional law is a TikTok ban, and we will challenge it in court. We believe the facts and the law are clearly on our side, and we will ultimately prevail. The fact is, we have invested billions of dollars to keep U.S. data safe and our platform free from outside influence and manipulation. This ban would devastate seven million businesses and silence 170 million Americans.

(Read more from “Chinese Company Appears to Ignore Threat of U.S. Ban, Says It ‘Has No Plans’ to Sell TikTok: Report” HERE)

Unveiling ‘Shadows of Grief’: A Marysville Event to Confront the Fentanyl Crisis

In Marysville, California, an urgent event awaits on May 3rd, from 6 to 8 PM, at the esteemed Brick Coffee House located at 316 D St. More than just a book release, this gathering serves as a reminder of the ongoing battle against the fentanyl epidemic gripping Yuba and Sutter counties. Sponsored by Supervisor Andy Vasquez, this event provides a unique opportunity for our community to come together, strategize, and mobilize against the devastating impact of fentanyl. As attendees gather to commemorate the release of “Shadows of Grief,” they will engage in meaningful dialogue, share experiences, and contribute to ongoing efforts to combat the fentanyl epidemic.

Tracy Norris, author of “Shadows of Grief,” has turned personal tragedy into a beacon of strength and resilience. Her book is a powerful testament to the toll of fentanyl poisoning, blending personal narrative with community advocacy. As a mother who tragically lost her son to this insidious drug, Norris’s words resonate deeply.

Supervisor Andy Vasquez’s sponsorship underscores the urgency of our collective response to the fentanyl crisis. With each passing day, lives are lost, families shattered, and communities torn apart. But amidst this darkness, there is hope. By uniting as a community, we can strategize and implement measures to mitigate the impact of fentanyl and prevent further tragedies.

For those interested in securing their copy of “Shadows of Grief,” books will be available for purchase at the event and online through Amazon.

Join us on May 3rd as we stand together in solidarity, resilience, and hope. Together, we can illuminate the shadows of grief cast by the fentanyl epidemic and pave the way for a brighter, safer future for all.

________________________________________________

Recent Q&A With Author Tracy Norris

1. What inspired you to write “Shadows of Grief”?

Norris: I wrote Shadows of Grief as a tribute to my son, Marcus who lost his life to fentanyl poisoning. I had wrestled with his addiction for more than a decade by the time that he passed away and after his passing, I realized that there were many pieces of our journey that could have a positive impact on other people – if I were brave enough to tell our story publicly.

2. Can you share a little about your personal journey that led to the writing of this book?

Norris: I knew I had a story to share, but I found it challenging to complete my writing project. Recognizing the need for a change in my approach, I decided to enlist the support of a writing coach. Together, we worked on setting deadlines, refining content, and navigating through the writing process. We met twice a month, during which she reviewed my work, posed insightful questions, and provided valuable guidance to help me stay focused on conveying my message effectively.

3. What impact do you hope “Shadows of Grief” will have on readers?

Norris: Ultimately, my hope is for this book to offer support to those who are fighting for the sobriety of their children and for those who are grieving a child who has overdosed or has been poisoned by fentanyl. I pray that this book brings strength to the weary, courage to the fearful, and connection to the lonely.

4. In your opinion, what is the heart of “Shadows of Grief”?

Norris: Shadows of Grief leans heavily on the human experience of loving a person caught in addiction. It tells the story of life, love, loss, and grief and allows readers to gain insight to many of societies questions around addiction and the function of families.

5. How does faith and spirituality play a role in your story and the message of the book?

Norris: As a mother and an author, I lean heavily on my own faith experience. The book Shadows of Grief encourages readers to explore their hearts and extend prayers as they gain strength, wisdom, the ability to live fulfilled lives even after profound loss.

6. What do you believe sets “Shadows of Grief” apart from other books on similar topics?

Norris: There are many fabulous books where authors have candidly stepped out of the dark to share their stories, and they are all very important. This story largely took place here in Yuba County though, it is very important to engage communities with stories and faces that they have known and loved. There is an extra edge of reality that happens when we know the families, the individual people involved in a story, and when we take a step back knowing that this is real, fentanyl is dangerous, and it is something that we should all be talking about.

7. Can you talk about the significance of the title “Shadows of Grief” and what it represents in your story?

Norris: Shadows of Grief is a title that came from a Facebook group that my daughter created for me just after my sons passing. It started with just a few moms who had lost children, and it grew into a small, but supportive and engaged community of families who had lost loved ones to fentanyl poisoning.

8. How do you approach the delicate balance between vulnerability and strength in sharing your personal experiences?

Norris: Vulnerability and strength are very connected in terms of sharing such a delicate subject. Initially, sharing was very emotional for me. It was candidly writing my thoughts out in small conversations that built my strength and eventually allowed me to engage with larger groups.

9. What advice would you give to other parents or individuals who may be facing similar struggles with addiction in their families?

Norris: When you love someone suffering from substance use disorder, it often feels like the issues are too big, and like there is no hope. I would encourage families to embrace hope with every breath they have. To lean into community supports, seek out mentors, friends, and professionals to help carry some of the burden when it is too heavy, but most of all to make memories, laugh, and love fiercely.

10. Lastly, what do you hope readers will take away from “Shadows of Grief” after finishing the book?

Norris: It is my hope that in hearing Marcus’s story, he will in some way still be impacting the world. I hope that there were times that readers can relate, smile, and even laugh because even in the chaos of his addiction and many challenges, he did bring a whole lot of love and laughter into the world.

Supreme Court To Hear Arguments On Whether Trump Has Immunity From Federal Prosecution

The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on Thursday about whether former President Donald Trump can invoke presidential immunity to shield himself from federal prosecution.

The court agreed to take the case in February after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit panel ruled against an immunity claim Trump had asserted to shield himself from special counsel Jack Smith’s 2020 election case. Trump has contended that presidential immunity is necessary to ensure that presidents are able to do their jobs without fear of political retaliation.

“If a President does not have Immunity, the Opposing Party, during his/her term in Office, can extort and blackmail the President by saying that, ‘if you don’t give us everything we want, we will Indict you for things you did while in Office,’ even if everything done was totally Legal and Appropriate. That would be the end of the Presidency, and our Country, as we know it, and is just one of the many Traps there would be for a President without Presidential Immunity,” Trump posted on Truth Social last Friday.

“Obama, Bush, and soon, Crooked Joe Biden, would all be in BIG TROUBLE. If a President doesn’t have IMMUNITY, he/she will be nothing more than a ‘Ceremonial’ President, rarely having the courage to do what has to be done for our Country,” the former president added. “This is not what the Founders had in mind! Protect Presidential Immunity.”

The Supreme Court will hear arguments on “whether and if so to what extent does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office.” (Read more from “Supreme Court To Hear Arguments On Whether Trump Has Immunity From Federal Prosecution” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

WATCH — NYC Construction Worker Shares Message to Joe Biden: ‘F*CK You’

. . .A reporter asked the worker what he thought of seeing so many Trump supporters in Manhattan for the business records trial that former President Donald Trump is facing.

“What’s it like seeing so many Republicans in Manhattan, so many Trump supporters in Manhattan? Does that surprise you?” the reporter asked.

The construction worker, holding a pizza box, responded, “No, not at all. It’s turning now. It’s Trump’s turn again.”

The reporter then asked, “What’s your message for Joe Biden?”

The construction worker responded, “F**k you!”

(Read more from “WATCH — NYC Construction Worker Shares Message to Joe Biden: ‘F*CK You’” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

Biden Reads Out ‘Pause’ Instruction During Speech; Bizarrely Lies About Trump Giving Him Boots

President Joe Biden or President Ron Burgundy?

In a case of life imitating art, the commander-in-chief blurted out the stage note “pause” Wednesday while addressing union members in the nation’s
capital.

“Four more years. Pause,” said Biden, 81, a la Will Ferrell’s buffoonish newsman character in the classic 2004 comedy “Anchorman.”

Members of North America’s Building Trades Unions stepped in and dutifully chanted “four more years” in response to the president’s botched cue.

It was not immediately clear whether the instruction was included in Biden’s teleprompter or in his prepared remarks.

The gaffe was one of a series of bizarre moments that peppered the speech, including Biden saying his predecessor, Donald Trump, had given him a pair of boots as a present. (Read more from “Biden Reads Out ‘Pause’ Instruction During Speech; Bizarrely Lies About Trump Giving Him Boots” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Indictments Issued for Former Arizona GOP Chair Kelli Ward, Rudy Giuliani, and Mark Meadows in Alternate Electors Case (VIDEO)

An Arizona grand jury indicted several important allies of former President Donald Trump — including former Trump attorney and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, former Arizona Republican Chair Kelli Ward, and former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows — for their roles in disputing the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Along with Ward, Meadows, and Giuliani, former Trump attorney Jenna Ellis and former Trump campaign adviser Boris Epshteyn, along with several members of the Arizona Republican Party, were among those indicted, according to the Washington Post.

Meadows, Giuliani, Ellis, and Epshteyn are among those who were indicted for allegedly attempting to help Trump receive Arizona’s electoral votes in the 2020 presidential election, which was more than three years ago.

People such as Ward and Arizona state Sens. Jake Hoffman (R) and Anthony Kern (R) were also hit with charges long after they signed paperwork on December 14, 2020, certifying that Trump was the winner of the election.

The indictment of several Trump allies and members of Arizona’s Republican Party comes as a Bloomberg News/Morning Consult poll conducted between April 8 and 15, found that President Joe Biden is trailing Trump in several key swing states such as Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, and North Carolina by six or more points.

(Read more from “Indictments Issued for Former Arizona GOP Chair Kelli Ward, Rudy Giuliani, and Mark Meadows in Alternate Electors Case (VIDEO)” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr