House Republicans Lay out Their Plan to Rein in the EPA

House Republicans released their proposal to balance the federal budget in 10 years, which included their plans to rein in the regulatory power of the Environmental Protection Agency.

Republicans plan three broad reforms for the EPA: reduce its funding, cut global warming programs, and eliminate the agency’s policy office . . .

However, the House’s plan for the EPA would cut the agency’s budget 80 percent less than what the White house recommended in its May budget proposal.

A House appropriations bill introduced days ago gives the EPA a $7.5 billion budget in fiscal year 2018, or $528 million less than the agency’s 2017 budget. The bill also ignored many Trump administration requests to cut dozens of EPA programs. That bill is still making its way through committee.

The House appropriations bill would give $31.4 billion to federal environmental programs at the EPA, Department of the Interior, and other agencies. That’s $824 million below 2017 levels, but $4.3 billion less than the White House’s request. (Read more from “House Republicans Lay out Their Plan to Rein in the EPA” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

White House Panel on Voter Fraud Begins Work

A presidential commission to examine voter fraud and the soundness of election systems across the country has a big job ahead as it convenes Wednesday for the first time.

Not only is the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity charged with investigating what to do about voter fraud cases and establishing best practices, it must do so despite meeting with resistance from some state election officials.

The initial meeting, set for 11 a.m. in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, will be livestreamed on WhiteHouse.gov.

One tool at the commission’s disposal is a database from The Heritage Foundation that compiles 1,071 cases of proven instances of voter fraud across the United States, the bulk of them prosecuted since 2000.

Most of those cases, 938, ended in a criminal conviction. Another 43 ended in civil penalties. A judge directed the defendant into a pretrial diversion program in 74 cases, and 16 ended in judicial or official findings.

The cases of proven fraud took place in 47 states, according to the database.

“A big advantage of the database is that it shows all the different ways that fraud can be committed,” commission member Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal. “It demonstrates, for example, you don’t only have to worry about vote-buying. A lot of cases involved that, but you also have to worry about what are the rules governing absentee ballots, since there are a lot of cases in the database of people casting absentee ballots.”

The Daily Signal is Heritage’s multimedia news organization.

President Donald Trump created the bipartisan commission through an executive order in May. He named Vice President Mike Pence as chairman and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, also a Republican, as co-chairman.

The 12-member commission includes three current or former Democratic officeholders: New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner, Maine Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap, and former Arkansas state Rep. David Dunn.

The agenda for the first meeting appears broad, not focused on specific issues of ensuring clean elections.

Trump has complained of 3 million to 5 million fraudulent votes in the 2016 presidential election that lifted Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s vote tally. Critics of the commission, including California Secretary of State Alex Padilla, a Democrat who oversees elections in that state, have said the panel is only trying to prove Trump actually won the popular vote as well as the Electoral College.

But von Spakovsky says that is not the goal.

“The whole purpose of the commission is to take a look at the entire American election process, from the voter registration system, to the casting of ballots, to counting of ballots, to the security—including cybersecurity—that surrounds all of this,” said von Spakovsky, previously both a Justice Department lawyer and member of the Federal Election Commission. “We’re not only trying to look at what problems exist, but also [determine] have people taken advantage of those problems.”

Despite resistance from some states in providing information to the commission, White House press secretary Sean Spicer said he believes most state election data will be obtainable—and without buying it, as political campaigns and private companies do.

“Most of this information is available,” Spicer told The Daily Signal. “All that those companies are doing is buying it from the states. So I don’t think there would be any reason to go to a private vendor. I think we should be able to do this utilizing official resources that exist within a state. “

He added:

Again, I think there’s been some miscommunication on what they’re seeking. The commission has asked that each state provide that information that is public, that they share. And because that varies from state to state, what they’re willing to give out, the commission was illustrative in its letter [to state election officials] in trying to describe what it was looking for. But I think we’re going to move forward very well.

Liberal groups such as the Brennan Center for Justice and the League of Women Voters, which have opposed voter ID laws and other voter integrity measures, sued Indiana Secretary of State Connie Lawson, a Republican commission member, because she’s providing the information.

Voter ID laws require voters to first show photo identification, such as a driver’s license or a special voter ID card, to demonstrate they are who they say they are and live where they say they do.

“The commission cannot bypass state rules designed to protect sensitive voter information,” said Myrna Pérez, deputy director of the Brennan Center’s Democracy Program, in a public statement. “Lawson might be a member of this panel, but her first duty is to the Hoosiers who trusted her with personal information so that they could participate in fair and free elections in the state. She must proceed carefully and with legally mandated procedures before sharing voter data.”

Pence is the former governor of Indiana, which he also represented in the U.S. House.

The panel likely will push best practices among states, such as voter ID and updating voter registration rolls, said Jason Snead, a legal policy analyst with The Heritage Foundation, who studies voter fraud and helps maintain the think tank’s database on voter fraud.

Snead noted a Pew Research Center study that found 1.8 million dead people were listed as voters, 12 million records with incorrect data, and 2.75 million persons registered in more than one state. (For more from the author of “White House Panel on Voter Fraud Begins Work” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

American Autos Built in Mexico Have Surprise in Trunk

If you recently bought a new car manufactured in a Mexican auto plant, you might want to perform a routine examination of your vehicle, like checking the spare tire – especially if it’s a Ford Fusion.

While law-enforcement authorities in Ohio and at the Drug Enforcement Agency announced this week the discovery of more than $1 million of marijuana hidden within bogus spare tires of new cars transported by rail, a WND investigation suggests the incident may be just the tip of the iceberg.

More than 400 pounds of marijuana was found packed inside of new Ford cars that were made in Mexico and shipped to Northeast Ohio.

The discovery was made when a service employee for a Ford dealership in Portage County, Ohio, noticed a suspicious package in the trunk of a brand new Ford Fusion during a routine inspection. The car had just been taken off the transport carrier. The package was pressed marijuana, placed in the vehicle to look like a spare tire.

Authorities found the car had been shipped by train from Mexico to the rail yard in Ohio. At the rail yard they found five more loads of marijuana in five other new Ford Fusions. Later, they found nine more packages in new Fusions already shipped to other Ohio locations and one in Pennsylvania. (Read more from “American Autos Built in Mexico Have Surprise in Trunk” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Mattis Directly Intervened to Save Transgender Surgeries for Military Personnel

On July 13, as the House debated an amendment to the 2018 Pentagon budget bill that would have barred the military from funding servicemembers’ gender reassignment surgeries, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis privately intervened, calling the amendment’s Republican sponsor and asking her to withdraw it from consideration, CNN reports . . .

Of the 200 amendments to the $696 billion National Defense Authorization Act that were being debated in the House, the transgender amendment — offered by conservative Rep. Vicky Hartzler of Missouri — was one of the more contentious, CNN notes.

Hartzler had offered and withdrawn a more expansive amendment in June, one that would have reversed an Obama-era policy allowing transgender service members to serve openly. Hartzler told CNN she withdrew the original amendment to defer action until Mattis had established his stance on transgender troops. But this month, after Mattis gave the military another six months to study the issue, Hartzler filed the new amendment.

“I can confirm that Secretary Mattis spoke with Rep. Hartzler yesterday,” Department of Defense spokesperson Johnny Michael told Task & Purpose in a statement. “However, the Secretary regularly engages with members of Congress to discuss issues of importance to the department and I cannot speak to the specific contents of their conversation.” (Read more from “Mattis Directly Intervened to Save Transgender Surgeries for Military Personnel” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Trump, McConnell, Pence Call for Full, Clean Obamacare Repeal

President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called for the full, clean repeal of Obamacare in late-night statements Monday.

The statements were released after four Republican senators backed away from the repeal-and-replace bill, leaving McConnell unable to reach the 60 votes required to bring the bill to the floor.

“Regretfully, it is not apparent that the effort to repeal and immediately replace the failure Obamacare will not be successful,” McConnell followed in a statement 31 minutes later, at 11:48 p.m.

“So,” he continued, “in the coming days, the Senate will vote to take up the House bill with the first amendment in order being what a majority of the Senate already supported in 2015 and that was vetoed by then-President Obama: a repeal of Obamacare with a two-year delay to provide for a state transition period to a patient-centered health care system that gives Americans access to quality, affordable care.”

(Read more from “Trump, McConnell, Pence Call for Full, Clean Obamacare Repeal” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Trump’s Son in Less Legal Jeopardy Than Son-In-Law Over Russia Meeting, FBI Veteran Says

Even if Donald Trump Jr. helped set up a meeting last year with a Russian lawyer in hopes of learning dirt on Hillary Clinton, the president’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and another official Trump campaign operative could face greater legal problems, a former FBI official says.

“For today, and this could change tomorrow, but today I would say that Donald Jr. was not a member of government and does not have a legal obligation,” Ron Hosko, a former assistant FBI director who was assigned to the agency’s Criminal Investigative Division, told The Daily Signal.

“If it is proven that Donald Trump Jr. was gleefully willing to go to a meeting with a Russian agent, the question is still: What is his legal obligation?”

President Donald Trump’s eldest son last week released an email chain from June 2016 concerning his interest in attending a meeting that turned out to be with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya and others.

Trump Jr. expressed that interest after an entertainment promoter who was a business acquaintance told him that someone connected with the Russian government wanted to share negative information about Clinton, who was about to become Democrats’ nominee for president.

Veselnitskaya provided no such information and wanted to talk about adoption policy, Trump Jr. said.

Trump also had yet to win the Republican nomination. But critics and political opponents say the meeting proves a willingness by the president’s son to “collude” with someone he thought was associated with the Russian government.

Trump Jr., now executive director of the Trump Organization, had no formal role in his father’s presidential campaign. But two others who attended the same meeting last summer did: Paul Manafort, then campaign manager, and Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, who worked in a variety of campaign roles.

The legal situation could be entirely different for Manafort and Kushner, said Hosko, now president of the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund, which provides legal advice and covers some legal fees in duty-related cases.

“Now that is different.,” Hosko said of Manafort and Kushner. “They are more directly affiliated with the campaign, and one is serving in government.”

“That will be up to Bob Mueller to prove [Trump Jr.’s] affiliation with the campaign,” he said.

If the meeting was illegal, Hosko said, “after-the-fact conspiracy” to cover it up could be a crime, even if the three didn’t realize the meeting was illegal at the time.

“If Donald Trump Jr. was not a member of the campaign, did he aid and abet in the conspiracy?” Hosko said. “He could wiggle out from … being a part of the campaign or government, but he could still be part of a conspiracy.”

Liberal government watchdog groups last week filed a complaint with the Justice Department and the Federal Election Commission accusing Trump Jr., Manafort, and Kushner of illegally soliciting a campaign contribution from a foreign national. Their argument: Opposition research was something of value potentially offered by a Russian national with alleged ties to the Kremlin.

Manafort previously disclosed the meeting to House and Senate intelligence committees.

Kushner amended his Standard Form 86, required for a security clearance as a senior adviser to the president, to account for various meetings. The president’s son-in-law did not initially disclose this one, but last week included it on a supplemental form.

Details on the meeting with the Russian lawyer emerged weeks after the Justice Department named former FBI Director Robert Mueller as special counsel to investigate Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential race, including any evidence of collusion with the Trump campaign. Congressional committees also are investigating.

The president said on Twitter that his son did what anyone would do during a campaign:

During the White House briefing Monday, White House press secretary Sean Spicer again characterized the meeting as having been thought to be part of opposition research that happens in most political campaigns.

In “the heat of a campaign,” Spicer said, people “quite often” ask about outside offers to provide negative information on an opponent.

“That’s what he simply did,” Spicer said of Trump Jr.

As it turned out, and as the president “has made clear through his tweet,” the White House press secretary added, the meeting proved to be about nothing “other than adoption.”

Kushner reportedly left the meeting early, while Manafort was preoccupied with his smartphone.

Asked about a hypothetical situation, Trump’s nominee as FBI director, Christopher Wray, said during a Senate hearing last week that he would advise those involved with a campaign to “consult with some good legal advisers” before having a meeting with a foreign national related to opposition research.

“To the members of this committee: Any threat or effort to interfere with our elections from any nation-state or nonstate actor is the kind of thing the FBI would want to know,” Wray told the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The progressive groups Common Cause, the Campaign Legal Center, and Democracy 21 filed the complaint with the Justice Department and the Federal Election Commission.

“The emails released by Donald Trump Jr. reveal, in no uncertain terms, his choice to place his blind support for his father’s candidacy before any allegiance to the nation’s security,” Karen Hobert Flynn, president of Common Cause, said in a prepared statement, adding:

Democracy is not a real estate deal or a New York solid waste pickup contract, but that is how these three Trump campaign officials treated it in agreeing to meet to accept opposition research they believed came from the Russian government. These revelations require prompt and thorough investigation by the DOJ and FEC for the good of the nation.

(For more from the author of “Trump’s Son in Less Legal Jeopardy Than Son-In-Law Over Russia Meeting, FBI Veteran Says” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Global Warming Extremists Urge Gov’t to Teach Kids to Have Fewer Babies

Governments and schools should be teaching kids to have fewer children in order to reduce climate change.

That’s according to a study published in Environmental Research Letters, in which University of British Columbia grad student Seth Wynes and Sweden’s Lund University professor Kimberley Nicholas calculate how individual actions cut greenhouse gas emissions.

They claim having one fewer child is a “high impact action” far eclipsing any other in effectiveness.

The study has received widespread attention, reported uncritically in the mainstream media, such as the left-leaning U.K. Guardian, and generating controversy across the conservative blogosphere and Twitter.

But Steven Mosher, president of the Virginia-based Population Research Institute, blasted the suggestion as “ridiculous” and “dangerous,” and the study as “climate extremism masquerading as science.” (Read more from “Global Warming Extremists Urge Gov’t to Teach Kids to Have Fewer Babies” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

He’s Alive? Kurds Say ISIS ‘Caliph’ Not Dead, Contrary to Claims

A top Kurdish official believes with 99 percent certainty that ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is alive and well, following another round of reports from around the world claiming the demise of the terrorist “caliph.”

“Baghdadi is definitely alive. He is not dead. We have information that he is alive. We believe 99 percent he is alive,” Kurdish counterterror official Lahur Talabany told Reuters Monday.

The Kurdish official said that Baghdadi is an expert at absconding from the reach of advanced intelligence services.

“Don’t forget his roots go back to al Qaeda days in Iraq,” Talabany explained. “He was hiding from security services. He knows what he is doing.”

Talabany added that reports about the Islamic State’s demise were also greatly exaggerated. The Kurdish official argued that ISIS does not need to hold masses of territory to be successful. He predicted that it would take three or four years to eliminate the global jihadist entity. Even after defeat, the group could morph into an al-Qaida on “steroids,” he explained.

The ISIS leader’s whereabouts remain a complete mystery. But Talabany guessed that Baghdadi remained somewhere in the eastern part of Raqqa, Syria.

Countless past reports claiming Baghdadi’s death have not turned up any verifiable proof. In June, Russia claimed with a “high degree of certainty” that Baghdadi was killed in a late May air strike. Following the claim, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights supposedly “confirmed information” that Baghdadi was killed.

Baghdadi last released an audio recording on November 3, 2016, asking members of ISIS to continue to fight for the city of Mosul, Iraq, which was recently liberated from the grip of ISIS by U.S. and coalition forces.

Baghdadi was arrested by U.S. forces in Iraq in 2004 but later released as a “low-level prisoner.” He declared himself the “caliph” of ISIS. In 2010, he became the leader of al-Qaida in Iraq (AQI). Then in 2013, he announced the formation of what is now known as the Islamic State, ISIS, ISIL, IS, or DAESH. In 2014, Baghdadi declared the establishment of an Islamic State, with himself as the “caliph” of the group.

The U.S. government continues to offer a $25 million reward for information that brings Baghdadi to justice. (For more from the author of “He’s Alive? Kurds Say ISIS ‘Caliph’ Not Dead, Contrary to Claims” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

House Votes to Look the Other Way From Islamic Terrorism

Last week, the GOP-controlled House informed us that it’s the job of the military to fight global warming and to create transgender brigades with taxpayer-funded “sex-change” operations and hormone therapy. So, what is not included in the mission statement of the military? Identifying the threat doctrine of jihad, the primary threat to our civilization.

On Friday, I observed how, through two amendment votes to the annual defense bill, the majority of the House voted to have the military combat global warming and to pay for military sex-change operations. While GOP leadership whips the heck out of conservatives to support their liberal health care policies, they didn’t lift a finger to keep their members in line to vote for a sane military.

Well, there was a third vote that swung against conservatives as well. By a vote of 208-217, the House rejected an amendment from Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., which would have required the military to study the link between Islamic doctrine and terrorism and identify a list of Islamic preachers who are fomenting this ideology. It’s a recognition of the obvious reality that terrorism is merely a tactic that is fueled by a broader ideology.

Before we throw our troops into untenable military campaigns, isn’t it prudent that we understand the threat doctrine of our enemy and identify who we are fighting? Evidently, that is out of bounds for the majority of the politicians in Washington. They think that the weather and castration surgeries are more within the purview of the military.

Here are the 27 Republicans who joined every Democrat to remain willfully blind of the threat we supposedly send out our troops to fight:

Amash (MI-03)
Buchanan (FL-16)
Collins, C. (NY-27)
Comstock (VA-10)
Costello (PA-06)
Curbelo (FL-26)
Dent (PA-15)
Faso (NY-19)
Fitzpatrick (PA-08)
Hill (AR-02)
Joyce (OH-14)
Katko (NY-24)
Lewis, Jason (MN-02)
LoBiondo (NJ-02)
Meehan (PA-07)
Newhouse (WA-04)
Paulsen (MN-03)
Reichert (WA-08)
Ros-Lehtinen (FL-27)
Russell (OK-05)
Sanford (SC-01)
Stivers (OH-15)
Trott (MI-11)
Turner (OH-10)
Upton (MI-06)
Walden (OR-02)
Young, Don (AK-AL)

Once again, the vote was extremely close but on the losing side of 218, which suggests that leadership clearly didn’t want this to pass, even though most GOP members quietly voted for it to avoid blowback from their voters.

Understanding the threat doctrine of jihad is not only vital to identifying the enemy. It is also important in understanding when not to get involved in a regional conflict. All too often, we send our troops into Islamic civil wars and capture or hold land on behalf of another side of Islamic extremism that is just as big a problem as the one we are initially fighting. We see this phenomenon today in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Yemen. It all flows from the fact that our military commanders don’t study this threat doctrine.

As I’ve said before, ISIS is not the problem. It’s one of that many faces of jihad and is now actually on the decline. The problem is Islamic supremacism – both the Sunni version and the Shia strain disseminated through Iranian hegemony. Thus, while our government is cheering the decline of ISIS in Syria and Iraq, that vacuum is being filled by enemies that are just as dangerous. All the hard work of our special forces and Air Force is being delivered into the hands of Iranian hegemony.

For example, while we have been bombing pro-Assad Iranian proxies in southern Syria, we have been helping some of those very Shia jihadists, such as the Sayyid al Shuhada Brigades, the Imam Ali Brigades, and Hezbollah Brigades, recapture western Iraq from ISIS. Our military is directly helping Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Force, which comprises these very militias, all of which are controlled by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps – Qods Force – under the command of Qassim Suleimani. These are some of the very same militias that killed hundreds of our soldiers last decade with gruesome and innovative IEDs. Now we are serving as their air force.

But fear not, we are getting tough on Iran … in Yemen … while supporting a regime that has ties to Al Qaeda kingpins. Then again, we are also fighting Al Qaeda in Yemen as well. Are you starting to get the picture?

It would be one thing for Shiite monsters to kill Sunni monsters without us spilling our troops’ blood and our treasure on their behalf. But for our military to tip the balance of power to Iran, which is a longer-term threat than the ephemeral and fleeting Islamic State, is downright maniacal. We will never develop a coherent strategy until we understand what and who we are fighting.

Sadly, members of Congress have no interest in directing our military to look at the map before they travel head first into danger. They are too busy studying the weather and paying for castration surgeries. (For more from the author of “House Votes to Look the Other Way From Islamic Terrorism” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

5 Ways to Keep a Tax Farm (Citizens) Producing

The government depends on the citizens to produce, to create value from which the ruling classes can leech. They need to keep us working and spending in ways that they prescribe in order to insert themselves into transactions which would otherwise have nothing to do with them. Here are five ways that they keep the tax farm going.

1. Credit Cards and Debt

Credit cards, student loan debt, home loans, and car loans all represent an obligation to work full time. Once you have been saddled with debt, you cannot make the choice to take time off to pursue a business endeavor you are passionate about. You are on the hamster wheel.

The more debt you have, the more you have to earn, and the more taxes you will pay on those earnings. The less freedom you have to be productive in an alternative way.

The housing bubble was no accident; the government doesn’t care if you can afford it, they want you to “own” a home–or rather own a mortgage.

Of course, debt has its place, for instance taking on a home loan in order to have lower monthly payments than rent, and put that money into an asset.

But the problem comes when people take on an expensive home loan because they currently have a great job, ignoring the possibility that the job may not always be there. There are people who take out loans for a car–a clever trick GM started back in the day–in order to keep up with their neighbors or squeeze some momentary satisfaction out of the purchase.

And, of course, credit cards give us a dangerous “solution” to depression: shop therapy! Just like a drug, it can give a momentary high, replaced by an anxious desperation when the bill comes. And all the while you are paying sales tax on almost every purchase.

That is why we must avoid debt at all costs. Spend within your means. Delay gratification by saving before purchasing rather than paying interest after a purchase. And really consider whether a purchase is going to make your life easier, or make you happier, or if you are using it like a drug for a momentary high.

When it comes to college debt, the thing to do is spread awareness of alternatives to college if you think someone you know may be making a big mistake.

2. Full-Time Corporate Employment

Corporate employment is a cycle in itself; it keeps you going for the next raise, for the next promotion, and for all the benefits. Corporations are a creation of government, and would otherwise not exist in their current structure.

Health insurance through work was once an extra incentive to make a job attractive; now it is necessary to avoid a government fine. Better work more than 29 hours to make sure your employer has to cover it!

And when you are self-employed, the government punishes you by making you pay twice the Social Security contribution, since technically you employ yourself.

A corporate job alone is not always a bad thing, it works for some people. But there are plenty of people who push themselves into a job which cannot allow them to reach their full potential. People get a job in order to pay off student loan debt, or in order to get a nice car or to spend more on clothes, alcohol, and novelties.

The government likes this because the entire tax extraction process is designed around this system. Even bonus pay is taxed at a higher rate, like lottery winnings.

But there is a way to use a corporate job as an out. If you can manage to get a nice-paying job, not rack up debt or long-term obligations, and save, then you have the freedom to turn that saved capital into freedom.

This doesn’t work if you save up just to travel or buy a house on the beach to pursue the #SurfLife. It works if your capital is used to create value.

Here’s an example from my own life. My sister worked a corporate job in Massachusetts and took out a home loan to buy an undervalued house. By improving the property, selling it, and moving to an area with a much lower cost of land, she was able to buy a nice chunk of property without needing a loan.

That piece of property is now being used as a mini-farm with various avenues for making money. She is now her own boss and can pursue more personally fulfilling ways of earning a living, which does not always involve fiat currency.

3. Regulations and Laws

Okay, so let’s say you have managed to avoid debt, and have saved up enough from your corporate employment to start your own enterprise. The government creates barriers to competing against their corporate lovers.

I’ll continue with the example of my sister’s mini-farm. An easy way to start earning money would have been to sell the delicious hard cider she and her husband were already producing as a hobby. But the law said that they could not produce it on their own property, they could not distribute it without paying about $10,000 for entry into the market, and a host of other tight regulations.

Okay, they also wanted to run a hot dog cart. They already owned the cart from toying with the idea in Massachusetts. Well, you can’t do a cart, come to find out. In that area, all food trucks must be enclosed. They already had a cart, they did not have a food truck.

They are powering through and creating a great business based around the farm, but her husband had to continue to work instead of being able to immediately pursue the business dreams.

There are a million other examples of government throwing roadblocks in the way of unique self-employment or starting a small business.

Let me know in the comments if you have run into these issues in your own business endeavors.

4. A Fiat Currency

Here is an easy way to extract money from the population: continue to print money. The Fed says openly they aim for an inflation rate of 2%. What does that really mean? It means they aim to steal 2% of the value from all cash and saved dollars every year.

The Fed prints the money, and therefore it is they who gets to spend the value they rob from our savings. It is just another back door tax, a harvest, to reap the products of our labor.

On the flip side inflation is a little gift to those citizens who are behaving properly, according to the government, and taking on debt. They get to pay back their debt in inflated dollars.

But the best part for the government is they don’t have to deal with any resistance to raising tax rates. Most people don’t even understand what inflation is, they simply think stuff just gets a little more expensive each year.

Having a currency with no true value means whoever controls it has the ultimate power.

The old standby strategy to mitigate inflation is to hold reserves in tangible assets such as silver or land.

But cryptocurrencies are another promising innovation. They aren’t where they need to be yet, but there is reason to be hopeful for their development in divorcing us from the Federal Reserve system.

You’ll want to subscribe (and get our free metals report) to hear more about the difference between investment, speculation, and currency when it comes to crypto-coins–our discussion on the topic is about to heat up.

5. Advertising to Promote Consumerism

Just like GM encouraged car owners early on to trade in their vehicle each year for the newest model, citizens are now conditioned to trade in their expensive iPhone for the newest model.

TV programming has long highlighted the lifestyle of the rich and famous, encouraging ridiculous spending on wedding dresses and birthday parties, and glorifying rich spoiled brats.

This article does a nice job summing up the disease of consumerism:

Under our current working conditions, people are forced to build a life in the evenings and their days-off. We find ourselves more inclined to spend heavily on entertainment and conveniences because we rarely have any free time. When we do have time to ourselves, it’s usually fleeting, and we eventually find ourselves neglecting those activities which are free—walking, exercising, reading, meditating, sports, hobbies, etc.—because they take too much time.

While having extra money comes at the sacrifice of personal time for some, for others they not only are robbed of their personal freedom, but they struggle to make ends meet on top of it. The “perfect” consumer works full-time, earns a fair amount of money, indulges during their free time, and somehow just makes it by each month. However, even those who don’t earn fair wages sometimes find themselves wasting small increments of money on unnecessary items for the wrong reasons—a cup of Starbucks here, a McDonald’s cheeseburger there, and those really cool fuzzy dice hanging from the rear-view of your 1993 Honda Civic.

Any way you look at it, we have become an unhappy, mindless, over-worked society. We buy silly items for a few moments of happiness before getting bored and moving on. We feel a need to keep up with fads, or to fulfill our childhood vision of what adulthood would be like. We hide our insecurities, avoid issues, and replace psychological needs with material items. By keeping society’s free time scarce, people will pay more for convenience, gratification, and any other relief they can buy.

But at the end of the day, the choice is still our own. With a little mental toughness, we can train ourselves to psychologically exit the system, which is the first step to bringing it down. (For more from the author of “5 Ways to Keep a Tax Farm (Citizens) Producing” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.