Body Language Experts Sound off on Trump-Putin Meeting

Dugan Arnett. For body-language experts, Friday was sort of like Christmas.

After months of waiting, after investigations into Russian election meddling, after considerable analysis and build-up, two of the world’s most powerful men — President Trump and President Vladimir Putin of Russia — finally met face to face at the G-20 summit in Hamburg, Germany.

Cameras, of course, were rolling for the initial greeting, and almost immediately, those who study such things say, the two began a nonverbal power negotiation.

Opinions on the interaction varied among body-language experts, but on one thing everyone agreed: For Trump, a man who has been routinely lampooned for the aggressive manner in which he shakes hands, Friday’s performance was quite out of the ordinary. (Read more from “Body Language Experts Sound off on Trump-Putin Meeting” HERE)

_____________________________________________

Body Language Experts: Trump “Completely Different” in Recent Meeting

By Chris Baynes. Donald Trump’s body language was “completely different” at his meeting with Vladimir Putin, than it was with other world leaders, according to body language experts who have analysed his meetings with other world leaders.

The US President’s awkwardly long handshakes have become infamous since he took office, with his habit of aggressively yanking other heads of state towards him. Psychologists say this is a tactical move to assert dominance. . .

Unlike in previous meetings with premiers, Mr Trump did not lean in and there was no sign of his trademark aggression.

The pair briefly shook hands for a second time at a media photo call, when the US President leaned back in his seat and refrained from pulling Mr Putin towards him.

[One expert] suggested Mr Trump was wary of appearing “chummy” with the Russian President, amid ongoing investigations into claims Moscow interfered in the US Presidential election to his benefit. (Read more from this story on body language experts and Trump HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

U.S. Army Mandates That Soldiers With Penises Who Identify as Women Must Shower With Women; ‘Mattis Is a Coward’

Female soldiers must give “dignity and respect” to transsexual men who join them in their shared shower rooms, according to training manuals leaked by soldiers in a mandatory class.

But this “dignity and respect” is a one-way street, according to the training slides, which were developed by officials working for former President Barack Obama. “Transgender Soldiers are not required or expected to modify or adjust their behavior based on the fact that they do not ‘match’ other Soldiers,” according to the slides, which were first leaked by TheFederalist.com:

The insistence that women remain mute when a man enters their shower room “shows a lack of respect for the vast majority of service members [because] no consideration is given to their feeling about this circumstances,” said Peter Sprigg, senior policy studies expert at the Family Research Council in Washington.

Female soldiers in showers are supposed to ignore visible biology and “act as if nothing has happened when some male … is all of a sudden in the shower room with them,” said Austen Ruse, president of the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute. “This is a flat-out humiliation of women. … Females will have their dignity and respect violated [and] they are being told this does not matter even a little bit,” he added.

Female soldiers will not even be allowed to cover themselves because it could signal a lack of “respect” for the transsexual man in the shower, Ruse said. (Read more from “U.S. Army Mandates That Soldiers With Penises Who Identify as Women Must Shower With Women; ‘Mattis Is a Coward'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Flashback: BBC Reports “Mind Control” Telepathy Was Beamed to Victims Giving Them Severe Headaches and a Tendency to Kill Themselves

From the world of unexplained phenomena: Is it possible to almost supernaturally brainwash people to such an extent that they would actually consider – or even go through with – committing suicide against their will? A BBC report from 2013 suggests that this might be the case, pointing to a suspicious quad-suicide incident that occurred in Turkey back in 2006 and 2007.

All four of the victims were reportedly engineers who had worked for Turkish defense contractor Aselsan, one of the country’s leading military electronics companies. Because of the company’s high profile, and the nature of these victims’ jobs prior to their deaths, the bizarre incident sparked an investigation by the Turkish Prime Ministry Inspection Board, which ultimately ruled that the alleged suicides could have been the result of what they called “telekinesis.”

In a report presented to the Ankara Public Prosecutor, the Board claimed that the victims could have been steered towards committing suicide through a form of mind control that’s been the subject of research by neuropsychology expert Nevzat Tarhan. Since the deaths, which occurred almost back-to-back over the course of 14 months, were immediately ruled a suicide, the Board urged the prosecution to consider the possibility of foul play in the form of telekinesis.

According to that same report, which included a study by Tarhan, the mind control weaponry that may have been used could have caused the victims to suffer severe distress and headaches. Tarhan also cited the possibility that the victims may have suffered an overcharge of electromagnetics, indicating possible neglect. In either case, these factors may have driven the victims to take their own lives.

“All three engineers were working on a friend-or-foe recognition system for Turkish warplanes at the time of their suicides, which had been brought back to public debate during the Ergenekon coup trials,” reported Hurriyet Daily News.

Turkish journalist claimed telekinetic forces were trying to kill Prime Minister Erdoğan

Not long prior to this incident, a Turkish journalist by the name of Yiğit Bulut had warned that “certain powers” were allegedly trying to kill Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdoğan using the same type of mind control. Just weeks after making this claim, Bulut was reportedly appointed to be Prime Minister Erdoğan’s chief consultant.

Regardless of whether or not either of these incidents were actually caused by telekinesis, the fact of the matter is that many corporations and nations are deliberately working on mind-influencing technology that could be labeled “techno-telekinesis.” There’s also evidence that such technology exists within the realm of social media, including at Facebook where engineers are developing a so-called “brain-computer interface” that would allow for users to communicate with the platform using only their thoughts.

This technology would also reportedly allow Mark Zuckerberg and his minions to intercept the flow of communication between Facebook users and the platform. Having the ability to monitor what Facebook users are thinking virtually around the clock would make it easy for the social media giant to, say, report whatever it deems as a “threat” to federal agencies like the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) or the NSA (National Security Agency).

The U.S. Department of Defense also announced nearly a decade ago that it had begun testing various mind control and telepathy weapons. A formerly classified document released through a U.S. Freedom of Information Act request revealed that the technology is capable of “beaming” words directly into people’s ears, for instance, or sending electromagnetic pulses to trigger epilepsy-like seizures. (For more from the author of “Flashback: BBC Reports “Mind Control” Telepathy Was Beamed to Victims Giving Them Severe Headaches and a Tendency to Kill Themselves” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

North Korea Threat: Alaska Mayor Says He’s ‘Worried About Moose, Not Missiles’

While lawmakers in Alaska have doubled down on calls for improved U.S. defense in the wake of a North Korea ICBM test, some have appeared to shrug off the threat seemingly posed by the rogue regime.

“I’m worried about moose, not missiles,” Anchorage Mayor Ethan Berkowitz told The Washington Post in a story published Saturday. “Bears, not bombs.”

Todd Sherwood, an attorney who served more than a decade in the U.S. Air Force, told the newspaper that if North Korea would to attack, the U.S. military reaction would probably be severe. He downplayed the threats cast by Dictator Kim Jong Un . . .

According to The Washington Post, Alaska’s past may have something to do with its mellow response to the possibility of an attack from North Korea. An Alaskan town was bombed in 1942 during World War II and in the same week Japan occupied two Aleutian Islands. Alaska was also on alert during the Cold War with its incredibly close proximity to Russia. Some Alaskan homes still have fallout shelters. (Read more from “North Korea Threat: Alaska Mayor Says He’s ‘Worried About Moose, Not Missiles'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Cleanup in Aisle 1776 Due to Post-July 4 Propaganda Spill

Pardon me while I clean up in aisle 1776 due to a post-July 4 propaganda spill.

The holiday may be behind us, but we need its spirit to last well into the remainder of the year more than ever. We are hanging on by a very thin red, white and blue thread these days. Betsy Ross called, and she’s unsure how many of those tattered threads are left to hold onto.

So we better be sure the memes coming out of Independence Day 2017 are the right ones, in that they are accurate and edifying instead of merely bombastic and ephemeral. And if you have spent any amount of time depicting July 4 as a specifically conservative cause – as I’ve seen quite a few do on social media, whether well intentioned or not – you might just be guilty of the latter.

To pollute Independence Day with partisanship is problematic on a number of fronts.

First, we don’t celebrate America’s founding holiday because it is inherently “conservative” in its branding. Instead, we are conservatives because we wish to conserve that which Independence Day represents. The transcendent ideals every generation since the Founding Fathers has been charged with recommitting to.

This is no mere semantic trifle. There was no “conservative” wing of the Founders. Whether ultimately on the Federalist or anti-Federalist side of the ledger when it came time to draw up a Constitution, they were all renegades who had committed their lives, fortunes and sacred honors to the very opposite of conservation. Although they made no bones about the fact they were standing on the shoulders of giants such as Locke, Blackstone, and Montesquieu; as well as the wisdom primarily of the Old Testament of the Bible. They were clearly attempting to shine a genuinely new birth of freedom into a darkness that had perplexed Western Civilization for centuries.

King George may have been mad, but it wasn’t exactly a mad notion for a king – or other aspiring potentate – to be skeptical that anything even remotely resembling self-rule could work effectively over the long haul. The mob was too fickle. Passions were too unbridled. Reason tended to obsess to the point of utopian fantasy.

None of which is wrong, but the Founders didn’t care. For them, it was high time the people of the world had a taste of the narrow gate and decided for themselves if they could, to paraphrase Benjamin Franklin, keep a republic or not. We take that for granted now, which is part of our problem. Because far from conserving something, the Founders were bringing a cultural and political big bang into the world.

Which is, in turn, the very sort of thing you might guess would be worth conserving thereafter: A new way of thinking, talking, behaving, and believing that had the proven power to blaze a trail in human history.

Which brings me to the other problematic reason for believing July 4 to be a conservative holiday: It’s too small-tent.

Short of the Gospel, July 4 is the celebration that speaks more than any other about how to set ALL people free. Or to put it another way, the City on a Hill was created for man—not man for the City on a Hill.

America is truly unique and undeniably exceptional, but it was never meant to be an exclusive club. Our nation’s leaders have honored its inherent obligation to be an example to the rest of the world to a fault at times. With untold blood and treasure spent meddling in affairs that were not ours to fix, but our fundamental inspiration for doing so was often in the right ballpark.

We believed we had been bestowed with a providential gift that was not ours to hoard. It was to be shared far and wide, and act as the very tonic to overcome all manner of tribalism, greed, and superstition.

Defeating the Redcoats was about more than a rebel yell. A ragtag group of 13 colonies doesn’t evict the British Empire from its shores for a tantrum or a shallow cause. It was about spreading true justice and mercy to as many people as were willing to take it for their own, like a precious seedling, and do everything required to help it thrive. Including raising the next generation of liberty’s stewards.

We are conservatives because we yearn to conserve that legacy by being those stewards, rather than tragically see it lost on our watch.

It is the Leftist who typically seeks to reverse-engineer his/her partisan idolatries upon that which historically transcends his/her subjective passions, because he/she is threatened by that which is objectively good, noble, and true. Agitprop is a mechanism of the Marxist for a reason. Let us not assist them in polluting our own stream, but isolate them publicly to their own shame instead.

And when we do, most Americans still reject that crap.

For when Independence Day becomes a partisan football for both sides, that is the day we have punted on our independence for good. (For more from the author of “Cleanup in Aisle 1776 Due to Post-July 4 Propaganda Spill” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Arch-Terrorists Emerge as Frontrunners for Palestinian Presidency

If you wondered why Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas was so unwilling to do the reasonable and humane act of stopping payments to terrorists, you now have your answer.

A recent poll shows that the Palestinian public prefers a leader even more radical than the terror-inciting Abbas, who has a long history of stirring up militant action against Israel.

More than nine in 10 Palestinians want their governing body to continue paying salaries to jailed terrorists and the families of terrorists killed in “martyrdom” operations against innocent Israelis, a new poll finds.

The Ramallah-based Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PSR) finds that Abbas has become deeply unpopular among Palestinians, accumulating only 31 percent support.

Palestinians prefer Marwan Barghouti — a convicted terrorist currently held in an Israeli prison for the murder of five people — to lead the Palestinian Authority.

Ismail Haniyeh, the leader of the Hamas terrorist organization, comes in second in presidential preference. Haniyeh has endorsed suicide operations as part of a genocidal campaign to destroy Israel.

“If presidential elections were between three: Mahmoud Abbas, Marwan Barghouti and Ismail Haniyeh, Abbas would receive 22%, Barghouti 41% and Haniyeh 32%,” the PSR states.

The poll also finds that only 7 percent of Palestinians support cutting off salaries to terrorists, while 91 percent are opposed. The “martyrs fund” paid out $183 million to 26,800 Palestinian families last year. Additionally, 6,500 jihadi prisoners took home a total of $135 million altogether, according to the 2016 Palestinian Authority budget.

Earlier this week, Abbas vowed to never stop paying terrorists.

“‘Even if I will have to leave my position, I will not compromise on the salary (rawatib) of a Martyr (Shahid) or a prisoner, as I am the president of the entire Palestinian people, including the prisoners, the Martyrs, the injured, the expelled, and the uprooted,” Abbas said, according to a Palestinian Media Watch translation.

White House officials have continued to push Palestinian leadership to stop terrorist payments as a show of goodwill to the Israelis. Trump envoys, Jared Kushner and Jason Greenblatt, have repeatedly asked a defiant Abbas to shut down the martyr fund, but have not had any success in stopping the terrorist-funding pipeline.

In addition to their overwhelming support for jihad against Israel, it might not come as a surprise that Palestinians also tend to be virulently anti-Semitic. A global survey in 2015 found that Palestinians are the world’s most anti-Semitic people, with 93 percent harboring anti-Semitic attitudes. (For more from the author of “Arch-Terrorists Emerge as Frontrunners for Palestinian Presidency” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Planned Parenthood Is Turning Aborting Babies Into a Fashion Statement

As disgusting as it seems, abortion activists are trying to turn the Planned Parenthood abortion business into a fashion statement.

At celebrity awards shows this year, a number of celebrities wore little gold pins of the abortion chain’s logo. Now, a company has created a pink lipstick to benefit the group that aborts more than 300,000 unborn babies every single year.

The media company Studio 71 created the exclusive Planned Parenthood lipstick for its Lipstick Lobby arm, TubeFilter reports. Indie retailer Opening Ceremony is selling the lipstick, and the proceeds benefit the abortion group.

The lipstick is called “Kiss My Pink,” and — good news! — it’s “vegan” and “cruelty free,” according to Elle. Never mind that the profits from its sales are going to a group that aborts more unborn babies than anyone else in the United States.

“We were hearing from our community from people who wanted to speak out in response to what was going on in politics, so we decided to roll up our sleeves and do something about it,” said Studio 71 spokesperson Davida Hall. “Since women’s health care is in jeopardy right now, making Planned Parenthood our first beneficiary was the obvious choice.” (Read more from “Planned Parenthood Is Turning Aborting Babies Into a Fashion Statement” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Stunning Claim: ‘Seth Rich Is Russia’

Americans will be holding silent vigils across the nation July 10, marking the one-year anniversary of the murder of Seth Rich, the Democratic National Committee voter-expansion data director whom some suspect handed over thousands of DNC emails to WikiLeaks during the 2016 election.

All Americans should be concerned about the investigation of Rich’s murder, a woman who has been at the forefront of organizing the vigil in Washington, D.C., told WND, because “Seth Rich is Russia.” (In light of the onslaught of leftist attacks on conservatives, the organizer of the D.C. vigil, “Kelly,” requested that her real name be withheld from this report)

“The ‘Russia-Trump [election] rigging’ story was a complete lie and fabricated – probably to deflect in part from the murder of Seth Rich,” she said, insisting Rich was the DNC email leaker, not Russia.

“The whole Russian narrative was created to deflect,” she said. “Any time any of the Democratic Party’s crimes are uncovered, within 15 minutes a story pops up in the media to deflect from it.” (Read more from “Stunning Claim: ‘Seth Rich Is Russia'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Painting of Jesus Investigated as a HATE Crime

Police on Long Island are investigating after someone hung a large painting of Jesus Christ on a fence at a mosque early Friday evening.

Investigators are treating the incident as a hate crime, reports NBC New York.

The painting is a crucifixion scene showing a largely silhouetted Jesus with his crown of thorns prominently featured. It appeared outside the Hillside Islamic Center in Nassau County, according to investigators . . .

Surveillance camera captured video of a man placing the image on the fence, police say.

Mosque leaders told police that they are not offended by the imagery of Jesus Christ, according to News 12 Long Island. (Read more from “Painting of Jesus Investigated as a HATE Crime” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

YOU’RE FIRED! Trump’s VA Terminates 500, Suspends 200 for Misconduct

Five hundred and forty-eight Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) employees have been terminated since President Donald Trump took office, indicating that his campaign pledge to clean up “probably the most incompetently run agency in the United States” by relentlessly putting his TV catch phrase “you’re fired” into action was more than just empty rhetoric.

Another 200 VA workers were suspended and 33 demoted, according to data newly published by the department as part of VA Secretary David Shulkin’s commitment to greater transparency. Those disciplined include 22 senior leaders, more than 70 nurses, 14 police officers, and 25 physicians.

Also disciplined were a program analyst dealing with the Government Accountability Office, which audits the department, a public affairs specialist, a chief of police and a chief of surgery.

Many housekeeping aides and food service workers — lower-level jobs in which the department has employed felons and convicted sex offenders — were also fired.

Scores of veterans have died waiting for care while VA bureaucrats falsified data to procure monetary bonuses, but fixes have been slow to come by largely because the union that represents VA employees has used its political muscle with Democrats to emphasize job security for government employees. (Read more from “YOU’RE FIRED! Trump’s VA Terminates 500, Suspends 200 for Misconduct” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.