LEAKED: Next ATF Director May Be an Anti-Gunner

Unfortunately, it appears that gun owners were right to be concerned about the appointment of Attorney General Pam Bondi.

According to leaked information that is being reported by the New York Times and now also by pro-gun YouTubers like Jared (of Guns & Gadgets) and Braden Langley, Bondi is considering recommending a “non-ideological” person who is an “older, more seasoned LEO” to be the new head of the ATF.

Her shortlist allegedly includes several former and current top ATF officials.

To put it bluntly, that would be a DISASTER for the Second Amendment.

Biden’s head of the ATF Steven Dettelbach was an “older, non-ideological, more seasoned LEO” – and as millions of gun owners are painfully aware, he spent years leading an all-out assault on our 2A rights!

You know who else was a “seasoned LEO?” The anti-gun radical David Chipman – whose nomination to lead the Biden ATF was torpedoed thanks to GOA members like you. Also, during his first administration, President Trump chose anti-gun president of the Fraternal Order of Police Chuck Canterbury and GOA members had to spend months fighting to tank his nomination.

It would be a mistake for a “pro-gun” administration to appoint another “seasoned” bureaucrat who knows nothing about the Second Amendment.

A lot of harm has been done in the name of “law and order” over the years.

Things such as registering gun owners in the name of fighting crime; attacking a group of loners in Waco, Texas; shutting down long-established gun stores for simple mistakes; abusing mentally handicapped people in gun “stings” in Milwaukee; victimizing pro-gun sheriffs with nonsensical new legal theories; murdering airport executives in Arkansas; and much, much more.

In fact, the ATF is defying judicial rulings against its unconstitutional gun control measures. Despite courts striking down their policies, the ATF has continued attempts to unlawfully enforce its pistol brace ban on multiple occasions—acting as if they are above the law!

Pam Bondi must understand that truly restoring “law and order” in the eyes of gun owners means fundamentally transforming the rogue ATF.

That means appointing an ATF director who will do ALL of the following:

• Stand up to ATF’s rogue officials;

• Help President Trump downsize the federal government (including ATF);

• Unravel Biden’s weaponization of law enforcement (especially ATF);

• Scale back the ATF’s infringements of constitutional rights; and

• Return freedom to the hands of the people to whom it belongs.

Maintaining the corrupt, tyrannical status quo by appointing current or former top ATF officials is not the kind of “law and order” that the American people want or expect.

In fact, President Trump began his second administration by taking an ax to the Deep State that has enabled “seasoned” bureaucrats to run wild in Washington.

He needs to do the same to the ATF by appointing a fighter who will defend the Second Amendment from the lawless bureaucrats who’ve waged war on our God-given rights for far too long.

Ultra-Woke Google Drops Racial Hiring Targets, Will ‘Review’ DEI Practices

Google, the wokest company in all of Silicon Valley, is eliminating its racial hiring quotas and reviewing its DEI programs, joining other tech giants rethinking their approach to “diversity.”

The Wall Street Journal reports that Google announced on Wednesday that it will no longer set specific hiring targets based on race. This decision comes as part of a broader pullback from DEI efforts across Silicon Valley, with companies like Meta and Amazon also scaling back their diversity initiatives.

Google’s move marks a notable reversal from its 2020 commitment to increase the proportion of leadership roles held by “underrepresented groups” by 30 percent by 2025. The announcement was made in an email to employees, which also revealed that the company is currently evaluating the continuation of its annual diversity report, a practice it has maintained since 2014.

The tech giant said it is reviewing its DEI-related grants, training, and initiatives to assess their impact and potential risks. This review is partially in response to recent court decisions and executive orders by President Trump aimed at curbing DEI efforts in the government and among federal contractors.

This is a titanic shift for ultra-woke Google, which infamously launched its Gemini AI image creator in 2024 which rewrote history to include “underrepresented” groups.” (Read more from “Ultra-Woke Google Drops Racial Hiring Targets, Will ‘Review’ DEI Practices” HERE)

‘It’s Gonna Be Taxes’: Kamala Struggled to Explain Funding for $3 Trillion Giveaway in Off-Camera CBS Footage

Then-Democrat Presidential Nominee Kamala Harris appeared stumped when asked to explain how she would pay for her economic policies aside from taxes in a portion of the unedited CBS News interview that occurred only after the cameras stopped rolling.

During the interview that aired to the public, Whitaker noted how the Nonpartisan Committee for Responsible Federal Budget estimated that Harris’ economic plan “would add $3 trillion to the federal deficit over the next decade.”

“How are you going to pay for that?” he asked.

Eventually, Harris responded by suggesting that “the richest among us, who can afford it” should “pay their fair share in taxes,” in order to pay for her policies.

“My perspective is everybody needs to pay their fair share,” she added, before invoking firefighters and teachers to try and justify disproportionately stealing money from people who make more. (Read more from “‘It’s Gonna Be Taxes’: Kamala Struggled to Explain Funding for $3 Trillion Giveaway in Off-Camera CBS Footage” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Uncut ‘60 Minutes’ Kamala Harris Interview Reveals ‘Word Salad’ Responses Were Heavily Edited by CBS — Snipped Israel Answer to Just 20 Words

Kamala Harris gave an 179-word meandering answer on Israel that “60 Minutes” cut to just 20 words, according to transcripts released Wednesday by the Federal Communications Commission.

The FCC says its investigating CBS for possible election interference, after complaints that the venerated news program cut Harris’ word-salad answers to make her look more coherent. Donald Trump has filed a $10 billion lawsuit against the network.

Trump-appointed FCC chair Brendan Carr got the full transcript and video on Monday after a tug-of-war with the Tiffany Network, which has defended the editing as a standard practice for “time, space or clarity.”

But a CBS source told The Post on Wednesday that the “60 Minutes” edit did Harris “a lot of favors and makes her seem more succinct.”

“You have to watch the video. A lot of ‘word salad,’” the source said. “Feels like a clean up on Aisle 7. Not a technical foul but one could argue still news distortion.”

(Read more from “Uncut ‘60 Minutes’ Kamala Harris Interview Reveals ‘Word Salad’ Responses Were Heavily Edited by CBS — Snipped Israel Answer to Just 20 Words” HERE)

Politico Misses Payment to Workers, Raises Suspicion That CIA’s USAID Paid It Without Disclosure

Many are wondering if Politico has received money from the United States Agency for International Development after the publication reportedly was unable to pay its employees as the Trump administration began to close the agency.

Politico was unable to pay workers but sent out an email blaming a glitch in its vendor systems. Critics pounced on the news to accuse the outlet of losing funding after President Donald Trump took over USAID and shut down its funding.

Politico has reportedly not disclosed payments from USAID or any other government entity, and it would be a major scandal if it had received funding and not disclosed it. . .

“Due to what we believe to be a technical error, employees did not receive their paychecks as scheduled. We understand the urgency of this matter and sincerely apologize for the inconvenience,” the email read.

“Our team is working diligently with our systems vendors and the bank to identify the root cause and implement a solution as quickly as possible,” the company added. “We will keep you updated as we learn more and work to resolve the problem as quickly as possible. Thank you for your patience and understanding.” (Read more from “Politico Misses Payment to Workers, Raises Suspicion That CIA’s USAID Paid It Without Disclosure” HERE)

LGBTQ Group’s Drag Show In Ecuador Funded by the United States

An LGBTQ group in Ecuador tapped into a $25,000 grant from the Biden State Department to produce a two-day drag workshop intended to promote diversity and inclusion abroad.

Footage obtained by The Post showed drag queens donning makeup, strutting around topless wearing nothing but pasties and crowing about how the displays could be used as a “political tool.”

Fundacion Dialogo Diverso, a nongovernmental organization that aims to promote democracy and the “LGBTIQ+ population” of the South American country, organized the drag show and published footage of it last July.

The State Department footed some of the bill for the show through its Bureau of Population Refugees and Migration, for which the nonprofit thanked the department.

“Funds provided by the US government,” a disclaimer at the end of the video read near an American flag, per a translation. (Read more from “LGBTQ Group’s Drag Show In Ecuador Funded by the United States” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

GOP Rep. Nancy Mace Triggers Top Oversight Dem by Repeating Trans ‘Slur’: ‘I Don’t Really Care’

A House hearing descended into bedlam Wednesday when GOP firebrand Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) referred to “trannies,” a slur for a transgender person — setting off the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee.

“Does this advance the interest of American citizens — paying for trannies in Guatemala to the tune of $2 million?” Mace asked a panel during a hearing on “Rightsizing government” Wednesday. . .

After she wrapped up her questioning, Oversight ranking member Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) lodged a parliamentary inquiry over Mace’s use of the term “trannies.”

“Let me please finish without interruption,” he added before Mace interjected. . .

“Tranny, tranny, tranny!” Mace, 47, hit back. “I don’t really care. You want penises in women’s bathrooms and I’m not gonna have it. No, thank you. It’s disgusting.” (Read more from “GOP Rep. Nancy Mace Triggers Top Oversight Dem by Repeating Trans ‘Slur’: ‘I Don’t Really Care’” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

Open Letter to President Trump: You MUST Pardon Thomas Caldwell (and the other J6’rs with commuted sentences)

Dear President Trump:

Shortly after being inaugurated, you pardoned virtually all January 6 defendants (J6ers), ordered that the Department of Justice (DOJ) dismiss other pending cases, and commuted the sentences of 14 higher profile defendants including my client, Retired Navy Lt. Commander Thomas E. Caldwell. Thank you for taking such bold and decisive action on this issue. While I understand that you are now working non-stop to clean up Joe Biden’s mess, I respectfully request that you take a few minutes to consider granting Tom Caldwell a full and unconditional pardon. Let me explain.

Tom is a 100% disabled veteran who was wounded by communist insurgents in the Philippines in 1974 while stationed at Subic Bay. The shrapnel that pierced Tom’s body eventually led to debilitating back and neck fusion surgeries and a plethora of other health issues. Now 70 years old, Tom lives in pain every single day of his life resulting from service to his country. This patriot’s treatment by a partisan DOJ over the last four years is an outrage that needs to be corrected.

On January 6, 2021 Tom and his wife, Sharon, left their hotel to attend your speech, but arrived too late to secure seats, so they watched the speech on jumbotrons on the National Mall. Like countless others, after your speech the Caldwells marched to the U.S. Capitol, where they rested at the Peace Monument on the Capitol’s west side for nearly an hour.

They subsequently walked up a public sidewalk towards the Capitol, climbed a flight of stairs, and eventually “escaped the crowd” by exiting on to a temporary balcony, where they stayed for 4 minutes before exiting the stage and the Capitol grounds. Multiple security videos proved that all “no trespassing” signs and barricades had been removed from the Caldwells’ path by protestors 20 minutes before they arrived at the Peace Monument. Notably, Congress had already evacuated Capitol Hill before they even stepped on Capitol grounds. Tom provably broke no laws, committed no acts of violence, and wasn’t even on Capitol grounds when Congress was ordered to evacuate the Capitol Building.

The FBI’s rush to judgment

Despite provably breaking no laws, two weeks later the FBI executed a Waco-style raid on the Caldwells’ farm in the Shenandoah Valley in Virginia. Approximately 20 agents armed with machine guns, a battering ram, and a tank surrounded the house. Tom witnessed seeing laser dots on Sharon’s forehead as she was ordered out of the house in her nightgown. While interrogating Tom, FBI agents accused him of leading a group of Oath Keeper members into the Capitol in a military-style attack. Why? In ferreting through Tom’s Facebook Messenger account, the FBI noted that his contacts, some of whom were Oath Keeper members he had recently befriended, referred to him as “Commander Tom.”

The FBI, however, was unaware that Tom is a retired Navy “Commander” and had never been a member of the Oath Keepers organization.

At Tom’s trial, the lead FBI agent admitted on the witness stand that he mistakenly believed: 1) that Tom was a Commander in the Oath Keepers organization; 2) that Tom commanded a group of Oath Keepers into the Capitol; and, 3) that Tom and his wife entered the Capitol Building. Comically, the FBI’s “proof” that Tom entered the Capitol was a photo of Tom and Sharon inside a temporary construction tunnel located underneath outside scaffolding. The lead FBI agent further admitted that, in hindsight, the FBI lacked predication to even open up a case up on Tom Caldwell, as he was not an Oath Keepers member and he provably did not enter the Capitol on January 6.

The Progressives at the DOJ take over

For several weeks post-January 6, left-wing commentators speculated that the “protest gone wild” at the Capitol was actually a seditious conspiracy, i.e., a pre-planned plot by right-wing militias to “attack the Capitol.” When FBI and DOJ sources anonymously leaked to the media in the summer of 2021 that there was no evidence to support “seditious conspiracy” charges against any J6ers, Progressives across the country wigged-out. In response, the DOJ and FBI literally launched a second investigation to find evidence—any evidence—to support the political narrative of a seditious conspiracy that involved right-wing militias pre-planning an attack on “our Democracy.”

The conspiracy that never was.

Under political pressure, the DOJ filed seditious conspiracy and related charges against a dozen Oath Keepers and Caldwell in January 2022, alleging an 8-week, post-election plot to forcibly stop the certification of Joe Biden as President of the United States.

What the DOJ actually did was reverse engineer a conspiracy by selectively editing political hyperbole contained in social media messages and tying it to the fact that Congress was forced to evacuate the Capitol. For example, the oft-stated “We need to take our country back” was, according to the Progressive prosecutors, code for “Let’s attack Congress.” On my cross-examination, the FBI’s lead agent admitted that of the hundreds of witnesses that had been interviewed who were familiar with Caldwell and the Oath Keepers, not one person was aware of any pre-planned plot to disrupt Congress on January 6, let alone an armed attack on Capitol Hill. The “seditious conspiracy” was not based upon solid evidence, but rather the hypothesis of a group of progressive millennial DOJ prosecutors who were virulently anti-Trump.

Had Caldwell and his Oath Keeper defendants been tried in Indiana or Utah, the jury would have recognized the political nature of the case and laughed it out of court. Unfortunately, they were tried in Washington, D.C. At the time of Tom’s trial, D.C. juries, notorious for being the defense-friendliest juries in America, had convicted seven January 6 defendants in seven separate trials of every count in every case—65 guilty findings, 0 acquittals.

Despite these odds, however, the jury in Tom’s case acquitted him of the three major conspiracy counts lodged against him (a fourth count was dismissed by the Court), but found him guilty of evidence tampering for deleting his January 6 “selfies” contained in one Facebook thread two weeks after January 6. At the time of his arrest, however, Tom still possessed on his phone and on a separate hard drive the originals and copies of the same photos that were contained in the deleted Facebook thread.

Tom Caldwell’s verdict and sentence suggest that a pardon is appropriate

Tom was sentenced on January 10, 2025 to 53 days of time he had already served after his arrest in 2021, a special assessment of $100, and no probation. Accordingly, Tom was not only cleared by a progressive D.C. jury of the most serious charges against him, but an Obama-appointed federal judge handed down a punishment more lenient than that meted out against the typical speeder in traffic court. When it comes to individuals who deserve pardons, Tom Caldwell is first among equals.

President Trump, please end this four-year American nightmare. Tom and Sharon are your biggest supporters. Instead of enjoying a well-earned retirement, Tom was used as pawns in a DOJ public relations strategy that pushed the myth that January 6 was an orchestrated “insurrection” to take over Capitol Hill. Like you, Tom was not only singled out for prosecution for political reasons, but he also is facing two civil suits filed by Soros-backed law firms. Thank you for your consideration. And thank you for doing your best to make America great again.

____________________________________________

Mr. Fischer is a Maryland-based attorney who has represented more than 5,000 defendants in his career, including several defendants charged in relation to January 6.

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Trump Pentagon Reportedly Preparing To Close Curtain On One Of America’s Projects Abroad

The Trump administration is reportedly developing a plan to withdraw U.S. troops from Syria, marking an end to the decade-long excursion in the region, two defense sources told NBC News on Wednesday.

The Department of Defense (DOD) is reportedly drafting a plan to withdraw all 2,000 troops from Syria in either 30, 60 or 90 days, sources told NBC News. Since 2014, the U.S. has maintained a troop presence in the region, mainly to fight the Islamic State out of its headquarters at al-Tanf in southern Syria.

Trump previously expressed his desire to avoid involvement in the region’s civil war, which reignited after a long quiet period after Islamic fundamentalist rebels Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) swiftly toppled President Bashar al-Assad’s regime in December.

“I don’t know who said that. I mean, I don’t know who said that, but we’ll make a determination on that. We’re not getting, we’re not involved in Syria,” Trump said on Jan. 28 in response to rumors that he had informed Israel of his intentions. “Syria is its own mess. They got enough messes over there. They don’t need us involved in everyone.” (Read more from “Trump Pentagon Reportedly Preparing To Close Curtain On One Of America’s Projects Abroad” HERE)

Female Athletes Sue Ivy Leagues After Being Forced To Change In Front Of, Compete Against Man

Several women who were former college athletes filed a lawsuit Tuesday after being forced to compete against a man and share changing rooms and bathrooms with him in 2022.

Grace Estabrook, Ellen Holmquist and Margot Kaczorowski all competed on the University of Pennsylvania’s (UPenn) swim team when transgender-identifying male athlete Lia Thomas was allowed to join the team and use the women’s facilities. The women are suing UPenn as well as Harvard University, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the Ivy League Council of Presidents for allegedly violating Title IX by discriminating against women and causing them “emotional harm,” the lawsuit states.

Many of the details included in the suit stem from the 2022 Ivy League Championships at Harvard during which Thomas shared changing spaces with the female athletes. The university did not provide any separate changing space for Thomas or any female athlete that did not feel comfortable changing in front of the male since all locker rooms were converted into women’s spaces for the competition, the court documents state.

Riley Gaines, a former athlete who also competed against Thomas, said the lawsuit was filed with “serendipitous timing,” as she plans to attend the signing of an executive order Wednesday barring men from competing in women’s sports.

(Read more from “Female Athletes Sue Ivy Leagues After Being Forced To Change In Front Of, Compete Against Man” HERE)