Election Shocker: FBI Reopens Criminal Investigation Into Clinton’s Private Email Server

/0 Comments/in , /by

FBI Director James Comey is reopening the investigation into Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server.

The news came Friday afternoon — 11 days before Election Day — in a letter to members of Congress from Comey:

In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation. I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday, and I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.

Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) tweeted about receiving the letter.

Over two hours later, The New York Times reported that “U.S. law enforcement officials” claim the newly discovered emails did not come from Clinton’s private server, but from devices owned by Clinton aide Huma Abedin and her husband Anthony Weiner. Weiner is currently undergoing investigation after allegations that he sexted with an underage teenager.

The initial Clinton investigation was closed in July after Comey recommended no charges against Clinton despite her “extremely careless” use of a private email server to send classified emails while secretary of state.

Comey ended his letter by saying he does not know how long it will take to complete the work of assessing the new material.

Reactions: Trump and Clinton

Both presidential candidates were set to speak at rallies minutes after news of Comey’s letter broke.

Speaking in New Hampshire, Republican nominee Donald Trump said, “Perhaps justice will finally be done,” and that Clinton’s email scandal was “bigger than Watergate.”

Trump’s Vice presidential pick Mike Pence tweeted asking the FBI to release all the pertinent information, saying that “Americans have the right to know before election day.”

Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway tweeted a link to the breaking news story saying that the day had gotten “even better.”

In a statement Friday afternoon, Clinton campaign chair John Podesta accused Trump “and his Republican allies” of “baselessly second-guessing the FBI, and, in both public and private, browbeating the career officials there to revisit their conclusion in a desperate attempt to harm Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.”

Podesta called on Comey to “immediately” release more information, adding “it is extraordinary that we would see something like this just 11 days out from a presidential election.”

Clinton has been quiet on the matter so far, coolly waving and smiling as she exited her campaign plane in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. News of the reopened investigation broke while her plane was in the air.

“What a beautiful day in Cedar Rapids,” she said as she stepped up to the podium at her rally.

According to NBC, a source from the Clinton campaign said they had “no idea” what Comey was referencing in his letter.

Reactions: Members of Congress

Minutes after the delivery of Comey’s letter, House Speaker Paul Ryan issued a statement, saying, “I renew my call for the Director of National Intelligence to suspend all classified briefings for Secretary Clinton until this matter is fully resolved.”

Rep. Bob Goodlatte, Chairmain of the House Judiciary Committee, also issued a statement, saying that “the more we learn about Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server, the clearer it becomes that she and her associates committed wrongdoing and jeopardized national security.”

October Bombshell Aftermath Uncertain

With the Election Day on November 8 only 11 days away, many are speculating how Comey’s announcement will affect Clinton’s campaign — though CNN reported Friday morning that 12.6 million Americans have already cast their votes through early voting.

Business Insider reported that stocks began “tanking” after news of the reopened investigation.

According to Washington Post-ABC News tracking poll released Friday morning, Trump has already been making gains on Clinton in the last week. (For more from the author of “Election Shocker: FBI Reopens Criminal Investigation Into Clinton’s Private Email Server” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Andrew Breitbart Strikes From Beyond as Latest Weinergate Threatens Hillary

/0 Comments/in , /by

A chance tweet that Andrew Breitbart caught started the ball rolling that ended then Rep. Anthony Weiner’s political career. More than five years later, the exposure of Weiner’s sexting addiction by Andrew Breitbart is still having an effect on a presidential race. The FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s home-based email server is reportedly being reopened due to evidence seized in an FBI investigation of Weiner sexting a minor. A predilection we never would have known about without Andrew Breitbart.

How did we get here?

In late May of 2011, Weiner tweeted out a picture of his genital area. Andrew Breitbart caught the tweet and started tweeting to Weiner to ask questions about it.

The scandal erupted from there, with Weiner first saying that his computer was hacked, and then finally resigning from his then congressional race. During that time, Andrew Breitbart crashed a Weiner press conference to give his side of the story of what happened, and to assure the media that he did not hack Weiner’s electronic devices.

Weiner has since gotten into trouble for sexting on a number of occasions, an addiction he hasn’t quite cured. Earlier this year, he and his wife Huma Abedin — who is Hillary Clinton’s closest aide — started divorce proceedings due to a sexted pic of Weiner with his baby next to him.

Flash forward to today, with the FBI investigation into Weiner’s alleged sexting with a minor female uncovering emails that may be material to the recently closed investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of home server for classified information.

In short, a series of events put in motion by Andrew Breitbart has the potential to topple Hillary Clinton 11 days before her best chance at winning the presidency.

Thank God for Andrew Breitbart.

Andrew Breitart’s legions of fans and friends have taken to Twitter to celebrate.

Mazel Tov Andrew, Mazel Tov! (For more from the author of “Andrew Breitbart Strikes From Beyond as Latest Weinergate Threatens Hillary” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Joe Biden Says He Has ‘No Intention’ of Serving in a Hillary Clinton Administration

/0 Comments/in , /by

Amid reports that Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton was looking at Vice President Joe Biden as her top pick to serve as secretary of state in her administration if she wins the election, Biden made it clear Friday afternoon that he is not interested.

He confirmed, though, that he is still fully behind the Democratic nominee and will help her however he can.

“I’ll do anything I can if Hillary’s elected to help her, but I don’t want to remain in the administration,” Biden told Minnesota station KBJR-TV.

“I have no intention of staying involved,” he said.

Although reports emerged Thursday night that Clinton’s short list of candidates had Biden as the front-runner, the vice president had yet to be approached by the Clinton campaign about the matter.

“I think it should be no surprise that Vice President Biden would surface as a possibility for this role,” White House spokesman Eric Schultz told reporters Friday on Air Force One.

He praised Biden for having “deep foreign policy credentials” and said the vice president would bring an element of “star power” while still having “the integrity and character to represent the United States’ interests around the globe.”

In an interview with John Dickerson that aired Sunday on CBS’ Face the Nation, Biden shared his plans after his time as vice president is over.

He said he wants to continue having an impact in government, but admitted he is still figuring out exactly what he wants to do and how to make that impact.

Asked by Dickerson what he would do on his last day in office, Biden replied, “What I’m going to do is go home and begin to figure out what I do for the rest of my life.”

Politico reported Clinton is considering several other people for the secretary of state position, including former Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman; former Deputy Secretary of State Bill Burns; Kurt Campbell, Clinton’s assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific Affairs when she was in the job; and Strobe Talbott, the deputy secretary of state during Bill Clinton’s first term and a longtime friend of the Clintons who is now the president of the Brookings Institution. (For more from the author of “Joe Biden Says He Has ‘No Intention’ of Serving in a Hillary Clinton Administration” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Clinton Campaign Wants Anti-Hillary Ad With Michelle Obama Taken Down

/0 Comments/in , , /by

Along with her husband, first lady Michelle Obama has been on the campaign trail in recent months advocating for Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

“I’m out here first and foremost because we’ve never had a more qualified and prepared candidate for president than our friend Hillary Clinton,” the first lady told a rally in North Carolina Thursday.

However, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump wants Florida voters to hear what Michelle Obama had to say about Clinton long before she had a vested interest in electing the candidate who has pledged to continue President Barack Obama’s agenda.

The ad shows comments made in 2008, the year in which the Obamas were campaigning against Clinton in a bitter contest for the Democratic presidential nomination.

The ad features video footage of the first lady telling a crowd, “One of the things, the important aspects of this race is role modeling what good families should look like. And my view is that if you can’t run your own house, you certainly can’t run the White House. Can’t do it!”

The Obama campaign later clarified that the statement was not in reference to former President Bill Clinton’s sexual conduct, but the remark was interpreted that way at the time.

Michelle Obama’s comments are something the Clinton campaign would prefer voters not hear.

BuzzFeed reported that the Clinton campaign has sent a cease and desist letters to several stations demanding they stop airing the ad, which was paid for through the Defeat Crooked Hillary PAC, a subsidiary of the Make America Number 1 PAC.

In a letter to the stations, Make America Number 1’s lawyer Larry Levy denied the demand from Hillary for America to stop running the ads.

Levy said the Clinton campaign seeks to “deny the public an opportunity to view our advertisement because it is ‘false and misleading’. In reality, HFA simply finds it politically inconvenient that a top surrogate for its candidate once held a differing view concerning her qualifications for office.”

PAC spokesperson Hogan Gidley said the Clinton campaign finds fault with the ad because it is effective.

“Hillary’s just angry because the ad is impactful, it’s working and it speaks directly to the women she’s been trying to con for years,” Gidley said.

“Hillary’s own campaign said when Michelle Obama speaks out, ‘it has a real impact,’ and indeed, we agree – because it was Mrs. Obama who correctly pointed out Hillary Clinton ‘certainly can’t run the White House,’” Gidley said. (For more from the author of “Clinton Campaign Wants Anti-Hillary Ad With Michelle Obama Taken Down” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

CARL BERNSTEIN ON FBI REOPENING HILLARY PROBE: They Must Have Found A ‘Real Bombshell’

/0 Comments/in , /by

Carl Bernstein, of Watergate fame, appeared this evening on CNN to analyze the startling news that the FBI has reopened its investigation into Hillary Clinton. He offered some extremely interesting perspectives into Clinton’s reckless and illegal handling of classified information.

Well, there’s no question that the e-mails have always been the greatest threat to her candidacy for president, that her conduct in regard to the e-mails is really indefensible and if there was going to be more information that came out, it was the one thing, as I said on the air last night, actually that could really perhaps affect this election.

We don’t know what this means yet except that it’s a real bombshell. And it is unthinkable that the Director of the FBI would take this action lightly, that he would put this letter forth to the Congress of the United States saying there is more information out there about classified e-mails and call it to the attention of congress unless it was something requiring serious investigation. So that’s where we are…

Is it a certainty that we won’t learn before the election? I’m not sure it’s a certainty we won’t learn before the election.

One thing is, it’s possible that Hillary Clinton might want to on her own initiative talk to the FBI and find out what she can, and if she chooses to let the American people know what she thinks or knows is going on. People need to hear from her…

I think if she has information available to her from the FBI or any other source as to her knowledge of what these e-mails might be, hopefully she will let us know what they are and what is under discussion here.

Right now we’re all talking in a vacuum but I want to add here that in the last, oh, 36, 48 hours, there has been an undercurrent of kind of speculative discussion among some national security people that something might surface in the next few days about e-mails, and I think the expectation in this chatter — and I took it as just chatter but informed chatter, to some extent — was that it would relate to another round of WikiLeaks e-mails, which our Justice Department people seem to be saying is not the case, but there has been some noise in the national security community the last day or two of this kind of possibility of some kind of revelation.

But this is her achilles heel and we have to remember that it also comes on the — back to the word heel — of the revelations about the Clinton Foundation. So the confluence of all of this is bad for her as it stands now but with some knowledge she might be able to stop, turn things around, and give us some idea of what’s going on in a way we might not otherwise know, and also it’s very possible that some members of congress very quickly are going to get an idea of what these e-mails are, and what this is all about, and for whatever purpose put some information out there. (For more from the author of “CARL BERNSTEIN ON FBI REOPENING HILLARY PROBE: They Must Have Found A ‘Real Bombshell'” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

FAT, DRUNK AND STUPID IS NO WAY TO GO THROUGH LIFE: Hillary Discovered Stone Drunk at 4:30pm — Wikileaks

/0 Comments/in , , /by

Yes, should this walking RICO violation become president, rest assured that we’ll be in the very best of hands.

Hillary Clinton campaign aides had a frantic email exchange in August 2015 over who should call the candidate to “sober her up some” at around 4:30 in the afternoon.

According to documents published by WikiLeaks, Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta emailed communications aide Jennifer Palmieri with a question at around 2:00 p.m. “Should I call her and talk this through or better to leave with you?” Podesta wrote. “I’m worried she’ll get on with Cheryl [Mills] and we’ll end up in a bad place.”

Palmieri wrote back more than two hours later with a response: “I think you should call her and sober her up some.”

Hillary’s problems with alcohol have been well documented and Wikileaks only confirms the reports. (For more from the author of “FAT, DRUNK AND STUPID IS NO WAY TO GO THROUGH LIFE: Hillary Discovered Stone Drunk at 4:30pm — Wikileaks” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

As America Goes, so Goes the World

/0 Comments/in , /by

I love traveling abroad, and since 1986, I have traveled outside the United States (primarily overseas) close to 200 times, including almost 50 trips to Asia and more than 70 trips to Europe.

During these trips (all for ministry purposes), I’ve spoken thousands of times through translators, sometimes in exotic jungle areas where man-eating tigers have been on the loose, sometimes in massive stadiums, sometimes in majestic, old church buildings, sometimes in huts.

Who can describe the experience? The different sounds; the different cultures; the different tastes; the different clothes; the different languages; the different expressions — yet always the same love for the same God.

Last week, during the 17th annual missions conference for an organization I helped birth (called FIRE, an acronym for Fellowship for International Revival and Evangelism), I had a very intense experience during one of the night services.

We currently provide oversight for more than 150 individuals serving in about 25 different nations (mainly grads from our ministry school and their families), some of them involved in rescuing children sold into sex-slavery, some involved in caring for orphans, some involved in feeding programs for the needy, some providing education for the poorest of the poor, some starting their own ministry schools, some planting new churches in unreached regions — often in dangerous parts of the world, including right in the heart of the Islamic civil wars in the Middle East as well as very close to Boko Haram in Africa.

During our annual mission’s conference, many of our workers come back from these foreign nations and share their stories and we help them raise funds for their overseas projects.

On this particular night, Friday, October 21, as we sang and worshiped together, I was overwhelmed with God’s love for the nations, and I began to weep, my heart bursting with the desire to take the good news of Jesus’ death and resurrection to the ends of the earth. (As a Jewish believer in Jesus, I’m always thinking about my own people as well.)

But then the thought hit me: Then why have I and others spent so much time and energy fighting the culture wars in America? Why not give all my time and energy to reaching the nations?

Immediately, I knew the answer: As America goes, so goes the world.

You see, our nation has had an incredible, unprecedented impact on the world, both for good and for evil, and if America has a complete moral and cultural collapse, the ripple effect will be felt around the world. In the same way, if we lose our religious liberties — we who are known for the themes of freedom and independence — it will have a chilling effect all over the planet.

As we think of America’s positive contributions over the decades, just ask yourself where Europe would be today without American intervention in World War II, or consider what international healthcare would look like or what international disaster relief would look like if America wasn’t here. The loss would be felt deeply across the globe.

But there’s a negative side to our influence too, and over the years, as I have traveled overseas, I have watched with grief as the worst aspects of our culture — our narcissism; our carnality; our obsession with violent and sexual entertainment; our divorce culture; our LGBT activism — have spread through the nations.

On my first trip to Singapore in 2000, I was speaking with a Christian leader there who was bemoaning the rising divorce rate in his conservative Asian country.

I asked him, “Did American media have any influence on your culture?”

He replied, “Once MTV came in, it was all over.”

He was dead serious.

And over the last few years, as I have sat privately with government leaders in different countries, they have shared with me the pressure they are under from America — sometimes straight from the White House — to embrace the goals of LGBT activism, or else.

Professors have talked to me about American pressure put on their universities; businessmen have told me about the pressure put on their companies; elected officials have told me about heavy-handed calls from our government — and in each case, the message has been the same: You need to change your antiquated standards and embrace our enlightened standards if you want to be partners with us. Otherwise, you will pay a steep penalty.

In other cases, pressure is not the issue, seduction is — by which I mean the effect of our TV shows and movies on other nations, as the message of Hollywood and the morals of Hollywood infiltrate homes and hearts across the globe, especially among the younger generation: “This is how we want to be too!”

And so, on the one hand, we continue to stand for what is right in America because we love our country and we love the people of our country and we love what is best for our country and we love the great heritage of our country.

But we also stand for what is right in America — which means engaging in the so-called culture wars — because we love the nations of the world, and what happens in America most certainly does not stay in America.

That is a sobering thought.

What will America export in the next 10-20 years?

The answer to that question falls largely on us. (For more from the author of “As America Goes, so Goes the World” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

National Geographic: Scientists Uncover, Study Burial Place of Jesus

/0 Comments/in , /by

The limestone slab traditionally considered to be Jesus Christ’s burial bed has been uncovered for the first time since at least 1555 A.D., National Geographic reported Wednesday.

Housed in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, also known as the Church of the Resurrection, in the Old City of Jerusalem, the tomb has been covered by marble cladding for centuries. Now it is finally undergoing renovation, giving scientists an “unprecedented” opportunity to study the burial bed.

National Geographic reports that the location was first identified as Jesus’ burial place in A.D. 326 by Helena, mother of Constantine the Great, the Roman emperor historians say favored Christianity.

“It will be a long scientific analysis, but we will finally be able to see the original rock surface on which, according to tradition, the body of Christ was laid,” said Fredrik Hiebert, archaeologist-in-residence at the National Geographic Society and a partner in the restoration project.

“We are at the critical moment for rehabilitating the Edicule,” said Professor Antonio Moropoulou, who is directing the restoration project. “The techniques we’re using to document this unique monument will enable the world to study our findings as if they themselves were in the tomb of Christ.”

The decision to pursue the renovation was made earlier this year, after the three major groups in custody of the church building — the Greek Orthodox Church, the Roman Catholic Church and the Armenian Orthodox Church — invited the National Technical University of Athens to study the Edicule, which encloses the burial bed. Renovations are expected to be complete in the spring of 2017. (For more from the author of “National Geographic: Scientists Uncover, Study Burial Place of Jesus” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Liberals Should Apologize for Obamacare

/0 Comments/in , /by

Obamacare must have been designed to fail. Even ideologically blind liberals wouldn’t design a program this bad without a secondary agenda. (Not coincidentally they are now floating the “public option” trial balloon.) And if it weren’t designed to fail, then when can conservatives expect an apology from liberals for the legislative disaster known as Obamacare?

I have more than a year of archived episodes of my podcast “Renegade Republican,” and a good number of them were spent warning listeners about the ongoing threats posed by Obamacare. I wish those predictions were fairy tales, but tragically, they are non-fiction. Sadly, I wasn’t the only one sounding the alarm about the coming Obamacare disaster. I say “sadly” because the warnings were pervasive.

If you turned on the radio, you heard conservative talk radio hosts warning about the metastasizing, legislative cancer known as Obamacare.

If you turned on the television, you saw a cavalcade of conservative talking heads warning about the coming Obamacare nuclear winter.

If you happened upon the podcasting arena, you heard numerous conservative podcasters warning about the hidden dangers embedded in the cryptic Obamacare legislation.

Even if you missed all of this but happened to search the Internet for articles about Obama’s signature legislation, you likely stumbled upon one of the thousands of pieces sounding the alarm about the approaching Obamacare asteroid.

But the mainstream media ignored us. They laughed us off as alarmist partisans hell-bent on influencing elections through hyperbolic alarmism, while the rest of the biased media insider class simply ignored us in the hopes we would all go away.

So when can we expect our apology from the liberals for their treatment of conservative Obamacare truth-tellers? I won’t hold my breath. But, as a reminder, we warned you about the following pitfalls which are now reality:

1. Skyrocketing premiums because of the expensive coverage mandated by Obamacare
Obamacare forces Americans to pay for health care insurance for services they either don’t want or don’t need. Where did the liberals think the money to pay for these additional services was going to come from? The tooth fairy? It doesn’t take a Ph.D. in economics to figure out that when you order Americans to buy insurance for health care services they don’t want, their premium costs are going to increase.

2. Increased usage of the emergency room as a primary health care provider because of Medicaid expansion
Again, it didn’t require a deep understanding of health care economics to predict that when you expand a government-run health care program to an entirely new block of recipients — at great cost to the taxpayer but little cost to the recipient — that they were going to use this “free” benefit at emergency rooms and other medical facilities.

3. Health insurance plan cancellations because of non-compliance with Obamacare red tape
Despite President Obama’s disingenuous pledge, “If you like your plan, you can keep your plan,” Obamacare forced health insurance companies to cancel policies by the millions because they didn’t comply with a series of new Obamacare restrictions and mandates.

4. Perverse economic incentives encouraged younger Americans to abandon the Obamacare exchanges
Not surprisingly, younger, generally healthier Americans — also the cohort least likely to be in a strong economic bargaining position because of their limited earning power and life experience —avoided buying the expensive health insurance product, which would have been a long-term drag on their finances and not a net benefit.

Knowing the far-left as I do, I’m betting that it will defend this legislative disaster until its last legislative breath. Liberals never apologize; they just run roughshod over the country and its constitutional restrictions and then blame the carnage on Republicans. This pattern continues because a compliant class of media sheep — led around by its herders in the liberal activist community and the liberal political class — never call out BS, even when BS was called a long time ago by conservatives sounding the Obamacare alarm. (For more from the author of “Liberals Should Apologize for Obamacare” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

No, Michael Moore, Hillary Will Never Be ‘America’s Pope Francis’

/0 Comments/in , /by

Activist filmmaker Michael Moore’s latest documentary, “Michael Moore in TrumpLand,” has been the trending talk of both Hollywood and Washington, DC, since its release last week. In the film, Moore discusses Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s rise to political prominence, then lays out a case for a Hillary Clinton presidency.

And because I know most won’t subject themselves to an hour-long Hillary PR fest — after all, you could just watch the mainstream media if you were looking for that that — I watched it to see what all of the hype was about. Much of it is what you’d expect from a Moore film: hyperbolic, foul-mouthed hippie socialism. But there was one part that absolutely confounded me: when Moore compares Clinton to Pope Francis.

The filmmaker suggests that Francis “kept quiet” on controversial matters like the LGBT movement (he didn’t) and his criticism of capitalism while he was a cardinal during the junta era in Argentina. But on the day he was appointed, Francis became the “people’s pope” — a universal symbol of unity (read: progressivism) in the church.

“He must have kept quiet all those years,” Moore says. “But he’s thinking, he’s planning. He gets all these other cardinals to think he’s some conservative a**hole from some South American dictatorship.”

Pope Francis rose to eminence, according to Moore, because “he bided his time.” Clinton, he argues, has done the same, allowing her husband and even President Barack Obama to take credit for her political ideas. But this presidency could be “her Pope Frank moment.”

“What if Hillary becomes our Pope Francis?” Moore asks his audience. “What if all this time … this has been part of her long game?”

The multi-millionaire filmmaker claims that Clinton was never taken seriously as a young politician. She was ridiculed for her appearance and discriminated against because she was a woman. Until now, the American people have simply failed to notice all of the good things she’s done to improve the lives of citizens.

Moore goes on to paint a picture of a President Hillary Clinton who champions radically progressive issues by signing executive order after executive order — from allowing all illegal immigrants to remain in the country, to releasing all nonviolent drug offenders from prison, to banning high fructose corn syrup. But none of this will happen, he warns, unless the American people “get behind her” and don’t “abandon her” like they have in the past.

Moore’s portrayal of Clinton as a holy figure stands in clear contrast with his depiction of Donald Trump as a fiendish tyrant, more diabolical and dangerous than any individual the country has ever witnessed. He calls Trump a “human Molotov cocktail” that appeals particularly to lower-class white men because he challenges “the system that stole their lives from them.”

According to “TrumpLand,” male Trump supporters are like dying dinosaurs, roaring at the top of their lungs because they believe having a woman in the White House will secure their demise. But there’s good news, he claims: Hillary — and all women, for that matter — are harmless. Moore claims that men are responsible for all that is wrong with the world. They built the first smokestacks, after all. They’re more likely to commit murder, rape, or carry out mass shootings.

“Whatever you’re afraid of does not wear a dress … Or a pantsuit,” he says.

I have news for Michael Moore: Hillary Clinton will never be “America’s Pope Francis.” It’s not because she’s a woman, or because she wears pantsuits, or even because she’s unlikeable. It is because Hillary Clinton has a thoroughly documented history of cronyism and class warfare, of attacking religious freedom and dismembering the family, of money-grubbing and power-grabbing.

Moore’s therapeutic, spiritual, secularist approach may convince some Americans to vote for his saintly rendering of the Democratic presidential nominee. But anyone who dares to hold Moore’s claims against the real Hillary Clinton will see how utterly absurd this comparison truly is.

Clinton is not some wild-card candidate with an obscure past who’s full of surprises. She’s revealed her character time and time again — and it’s been consistently terrible. If there’s one thing Pope Francis and Hillary have in common, it’s the fact that they both have public track records. Those who really want to research the truth about these public figures can readily do so. Those who don’t are free to blindly wander around Michael Moore’s “Lala land.” (For more from the author of “No, Michael Moore, Hillary Will Never Be ‘America’s Pope Francis'” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.