What It’s Like to Be on ISIS’ Kill List

Waleed Basyouni is trying to take something good from the fact that the Islamic State terrorist group has specifically targeted him for death.

In the twisted way in which the Islamic State, also known as ISIS, views the world, Basyouni says he would not be considered a threat to the terrorists if he wasn’t doing something right.

“I have a long history with these jihadist groups speaking very vocally against them,” Basyouni, a Houston imam, told The Daily Signal.

“When we, as Muslims, come out and show there is another choice, you can be successful or accepted in keeping a Muslim identity and also a national identity, that in itself will destroy what ISIS is calling for, even if it makes us a target. I take pride from that. It means whatever I am doing is hurting them and I am glad to know that.”

Last month, ISIS published a hit list in its online propaganda magazine, Dabiq, targeting moderate Muslims living in the West.

In an article titled, “Kill the Imams of Kufr in the West,” ISIS calls for its followers to kill “overt crusaders” and “politically active apostates” who “involve themselves in the politics and enforcing laws of the kufr [disbelievers].”

The target list includes high profile Muslim American political figures Rashad Hussain, who has served as the U.S. special envoy to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, and Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn. And for the first time, ISIS put out a direct hit on U.S. imams, or religious leaders, including Basyouni.

In an hour-long phone interview with The Daily Signal this week, Basyouni described what it’s like being on an ISIS kill list, and why the threat won’t stop him from preaching Islam the only way he knows how, and condemning those who twist the religion into something it isn’t.

There is nothing scary about Basyouni, a baby-faced 46-year-old Muslim whose idea of extreme is indulging in sports like scuba diving and mountain climbing.

Basyouni is the imam of the Clear Lake Islamic Center in Houston. Known since before 9/11 to deliver sermons in which he challenges prominent terrorists by name, including Osama bin Laden and Anwar al-Awlaki, Basyouni travels the world spreading his counter-narrative message.

“We try to educate Muslims about the true religion so that we can build a resilient community immune from extreme messages that ISIS and other terrorist groups are trying to spread,” said Basyouni, who is also the vice president of the AlMaghrib Institute, an educational nonprofit for Muslims that he says has more than 130,000 students across the world.

“That’s what bothers ISIS the most—the firewall we are building inside the communities through education,” Basyouni added.

Born in Egypt, and raised in Saudi Arabia, Basyouni moved to the United States in 1997.

Basyouni immigrated first to Montana to be with his wife, who had previously come to the state from Saudi Arabia.

Already possessing bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Islamic studies from Al-Imam Muhammad University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Basyouni earned a doctorate in theology from the Graduate Theological Foundation in Indiana.

He’s proving that Islam and the West can co-exist, much to ISIS’ chagrin.

“I chose to live here,” Basyouni said. “I chose to be an American citizen and I truly believe this is the greatest country in the world today. I will stand out against any threat to this society at large. If I can make this place safe, I will do it.”

Basyouni believes that his religious expertise, and exposure to different teachings of Islam, taught him to be an “independent thinker,” and gives him the credibility to confront ISIS. His authority is bolstered by his large following: Basyouni has more than 30,000 Twitter followers, and over 230,000 people have “liked” his Facebook page.

“This is my duty as a Muslim scholar,” Basyouni said. “These guys have abused my religion. We have a verse in the Quran that says people of knowledge will explain it to the people and defend their religion. This kind of counter messaging is what gives me superiority over others because I can strip down the evidence and names they use to claim legitimacy.”

Basyouni learned he had become an ISIS target from a friend—a former Department of Homeland Security employee—who also made the hit list.

To ensure his safety, Basyouni says he quickly contacted his local FBI connections, who he says he has a “working relationship” with (he’s a 2012 graduate of the bureau’s citizens academy).

Basyouni’s young children, a 15-year-old daughter and 9-year-old son who he preferred not to name, reacted to the news in their own way.

“I told them to take it easy and it’s not a big deal, but my daughter heard from a classmate in school that, ‘Your dad is on the ISIS kill list,’” Basyouni said. “She came to me and said, ‘Papa, is that true they are going to kill you?’ I said, ‘I hope not.’ I never thought I’d have that conversation with my 15-year-old daughter.”

Basyouni says he has received supportive calls from leaders of Houston area synagogues and churches, neighbors, and officers in the local police department. While Basyouni promises to be more cautious when he travels—and he will consider hiring private security—he says he won’t limit his activism.

“I take the threat seriously, absolutely,” Basyouni said. “Some of my friends have told me to be more general, and not name names. I believe these issues have to be addressed very bluntly and explicitly. I think it would be wrong if I limit my activity. I would be giving them [ISIS] what they want and not what they deserve. They make these threats just to scare us and stop us from doing what we are doing. But I am not scared.” (For more from the author of “What It’s Like to Be on ISIS’ Kill List” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Central Americans Are Crossing the Border Illegally at 2014 ‘Crisis’ Levels

The number of children illegally crossing the U.S.-Mexico border alone during the first six months of this fiscal year is almost at the level of apprehensions that occurred in the same time period of 2014, a year when the Obama administration described the issue as a humanitarian crisis.

Children are coming with their families, meanwhile, at a rate almost double from two years ago.

The surge—both in 2014 and this year—is being driven by migrants fleeing violence, corruption, and poverty from the Central American countries of El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras.

The spikes are alarming immigration experts because crossings of the southwest border had declined after Mexico last year began better enforcing its borders—with help from the U.S.—and the Obama administration in 2014 pursued a public awareness campaign in Central America discouraging people from migrating.

According to data compiled by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, apprehensions at the southern border this fiscal year of unaccompanied children, and families, is significantly up from 2015.

Experts tell The Daily Signal the sustained flow of illegal immigration from Central America shows the problem cannot be solved by enforcement measures alone.

“Our current policy of deterrence featuring interdictions and family detention won’t work in the long run—you need more of a protection scheme,” said Kevin Appleby, director of international migration policy at the Center for Migration Studies.

“You need a regional protection system that gives children and families an alternative to taking the dangerous journey to the United States.”

David Inserra, a homeland security expert at The Heritage Foundation, believes that the slow process of immigrants getting resolution to their cases at backlogged immigration courts, and the fact that few are being deported quickly, is giving incentive for migrants to travel here illegally.

“Our efforts with Central American governments on outreach may have had some success, but reality has caught up to public affairs,” Inserra said.

“People are seeing that if you come to the U.S. as a child or with your family, you are not going to be removed quickly.”

With the summer approaching, when peaks of illegal immigration usually occur, the Obama administration has started to prepare, with the Department of Health and Human Services requesting contingency funding to shelter apprehended children from Central America, who are given special protection under U.S. law and cannot be deported without a hearing.

In other efforts to deal with the challenge, the Obama administration is contesting a court ruling last year from a federal judge in California, who ordered that children and their parents temporarily held in detention centers (as they wait for a hearing on their status) should be released quickly, and that minors can’t be kept in facilities not licensed for child care.

In addition, earlier this year, Immigrations and Customs Enforcement began a series of raids targeting Central American families who have already been told by an immigration judge that they don’t qualify for asylum.

Yet the administration has also sought more enduring solutions. Late last year, Congress agreed to provide $750 million in spending to help Central American countries combat poverty, gang violence, trafficking, and government corruption, and to improve border security and social programs.

On Jan. 13, Secretary of State John Kerry announced an expansion of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program to protect children and families from Central America.

The program was designed to screen migrants for refugee status before they make the dangerous journey to the U.S., which often involves them paying human smugglers.

Under the new program, any immigrant from El Salvador, Guatemala, or Honduras who is claiming persecution can apply to the United Nations for protection, but the laws determining eligibility to come to the U.S. as a refugee did not change.

Before the new program was created, only children with parents already living legally in the U.S. could apply in their home countries for refugee status here.

Appleby says these programs have been slow moving, because many children struggle to obtain legal representation and that Central American immigrants find it difficult to access processing centers.

The numbers would seem to back him up.

According to State Department data, there were 85 immigrants from El Salvador admitted to the U.S. as refugees from January through April, but only 12 migrants have been resettled from Honduras this year, and two from Guatemala.

While Inserra supports in-country processing and other efforts to discourage migrants from taking the dangerous journey to the U.S., he believes American policymakers can do more to enforce the law.

“The reality is there are pushes and pull factors, whenever you talk about how to stop illegal immigration,” Inserra said. “We can’t pursue a purely enforcement-based strategy. Working with the Central American governments to encourage rule of law, and to fight corruption and criminality, has to be a piece of it. Where we can help, we should, but we can’t control how well Honduras or El Salvador actually does those things. We can completely control how we enforce our own laws.”

Appleby argues the conditions driving Central Americans away from their home countries are so strong right now that U.S. policy only means so much.

“Regardless of what policies may or not be drawing them here, you have a push factor that is much stronger,” Appleby said. “The forces driving children and families are much stronger than the risks of the journey, at least in their mind, so they take their chances.” (For more from the author of “Central Americans Are Crossing the Border Illegally at 2014 ‘Crisis’ Levels” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Speaker Ryan Will Not Support Donald Trump… Yet [+video]

By CR Wire. In an exclusive interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper, Speaker of the House Paul Ryan said he is not ready to support Donald Trump.

Ryan said “we have a ways to go” in the unifying process, and that the burden is on Trump to unify the party on conservative principles and ideas. Ryan did go on to say that he hoped, for the sake of the party and country, that Republicans would come together. (For more from the author of “Speaker Ryan Will Not Support Donald Trump… Yet” please click HERE)

________________________________

Paul Ryan Spoils Trump’s Victory by Withholding Endorsement

By Newsmax. House Speaker Paul Ryan took the extraordinary step of saying he isn’t ready to support Donald Trump, and Trump fired right back, igniting a spat that pits one of the nation’s most popular and prominent Republicans against his party’s presumptive nominee.

Putting the brakes on Trump’s coronation, Ryan said on CNN that Trump needed to stop the bullying and demonstrate his conservative credentials in order to win the speaker’s support.

“I hope to support our nominee,” Ryan said. “At this point, I’m just not there right now.”

Trump quickly retorted: “I am not ready to support Speaker Ryan’s agenda.” (Read more from “Paul Ryan Spoils Trump’s Victory by Withholding Endorsement” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Despicable Weasel Harry Reid (Which Is the Term He Prefers, I Hear) Finally Breaks the Hypocrisy-Meter

In advance of Harry Reid’s press call on the Supreme Court this afternoon, AR2 thought it was important to again point out his past hypocrisy and his tendency to play politics with this issue.

Remember, in 2005, Reid said on the Senate floor that nowhere in the Constitution “does it say the Senate has a duty to give presidential nominees ‘an up or down vote.’”

What’s even more ludicrous than his clear hypocrisy now is the fact that he refuses to acknowledge it. He was pressed on this by Chuck Todd on Meet The Press but continued to obfuscate and even claimed, “I’ve always, I’ve been very firm,” on this issue.
In the immediate aftermath of Justice Scalia’s death, Reid’s strategic calculation was already at work, trying to score political points by urging President Obama “to pick someone to pressure Senate Republicans:”

“Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid and several other Democrats, for instance, want Obama to pick someone to pressure Senate Republicans — someone who they would ordinarily support but are only opposing now because it’s an election year.”

The bottom line is the Harry Reid does not care about the American people’s opinion and does not want them to have a voice in the make-up of Supreme Court. His deliberate political posturing is beneath the legacy of Justice Scalia and the American people should be very aware of his attempts to circumvent their voice from this process. (For more from the author of “Despicable Weasel Harry Reid (Which Is the Term He Prefers, I Hear) Finally Breaks the Hypocrisy-Meter” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

FBI Makes Final Preparations to Interview Hillary Clinton

The FBI is reportedly making arrangements to interview Hillary Clinton as it nears the end of its investigation into her use of a private, unsecured server to conduct government business.

As reported by Western Journalism, investigators found over 2,200 emails from Clinton’s server containing classified information. The FBI investigation is focused on whether federal laws regarding the handling of government documents have been violated.

CNN reported Thursday that the FBI has recently interviewed key Clinton aides including Huma Abedin. Additionally, former Clinton employee, Bryan Pagliano, who helped set up the former secretary of state’s server, was granted immunity and has been interviewed by the agency as part of the inquiry . . .

One final step in the investigation will be bringing Clinton herself in for questioning. The FBI will coordinate with the campaign and her Secret Service detail to ensure the meeting takes place privately, ideally, as far as the Clinton team is concerned, without the media aware of its time or location. (Read more from “FBI Makes Final Preparations to Interview Hillary Clinton” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Watch: Black Female Executive Speaks out About Working for Trump Family

Lynne Patton had had enough, so she decided to lay out exactly what she thought about Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. Patton, who is black, shared her judgments in a letter she read on a YouTube video, which has more than 127,000 views.

“I can no longer remain silent about the repeated and reprehensible attempts to align my boss and his family with racist hate-mongering groups, campaigns and messaging,” wrote Patton, director of the Eric Trump Foundation and assistant to Eric Trump, Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr. She said the video was not part of her employment but was triggered by the reaction Trump has received during his campaign.

“To the skeptics who will undoubtedly claim that I am doing this at the behest of the Trump family or with the promise of reward, I deliberately chose not to seek their approval nor council in advance to this video for fear that there would be more concern for me and its potential viral ramifications than they would be for themselves and the fact that quite simply this is the right thing to do,” said Patton, who posted the video on YouTube and has been flooded with comments on Twitter.

“The Trump family that I know is, without question, one of the most generous, compassionate and philanthropic families I’ve ever had the privilege of knowing and the honor to call friends,” she said. “They have been incredibly loyal to me and to the countless dedicated people they employ around the world – hiring more minority and female executives than any other company for which I’ve ever worked” . . .

“To equate racism with my boss’ call for a temporary moratorium on a flawed immigration system that radical Islamic terrorists continue to exploit, or the construction of an impassible wall to protect our borders from the influx of illegal drugs, is not only incendiary, it’s wholly irresponsible and only serves to embolden the very hatred these draconian groups espouse,” she wrote, later criticizing “paid protesters” who target Trump. (Read more from “Black Female Executive Speaks out About Working for Trump Family” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Ted Cruz’s Top Aides Explain His Decision to Suspend His Campaign

Following Tuesday’s Indiana primary, Republican presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz announced the suspension of his campaign.

Apparently this call was not a spur of the moment decision.

On Monday night, Cruz participated in a conference call with his advisers to discuss the path the campaign would take based on the results of Tuesday’s voting.

Two aides suggested he continue his campaign so conservative voters would have an alternative to Trump.

However, Cruz chose not to heed this advice, and according to another top aide, felt the Republican race was getting “out of hand,” and his remaining in the race may result in permanent damage to the conservative movement. He did what he believed was “best for the country,” said the aide . . .

Just before announcing the suspension of his campaign, Cruz said, “From the beginning I’ve said I would continue on as long as there was a viable path to victory. Tonight, I’m sorry to say, it appears that path has been foreclosed.” (Read more from “Ted Cruz’s Top Aides Explain His Decision to Suspend His Campaign” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

50 Families Sue Over Illinois High School’s Transgender Bathroom Policy

A group of 50 families whose children attend a high school in Illinois filed a federal lawsuit Wednesday, attempting to reverse a policy that allows a transgender student to use girls’ bathrooms, locker rooms, and other sex-specific facilities.

The families are challenging a policy at Township High School District 211 that was mandated by the U.S. Department of Education to accommodate the transgender student, who was born male but identifies as a female.

“It’s an organic group of parents and students who came together and said, ‘We have to do something about this—we can’t just roll over and allow the federal government to force our school to commingle the sexes in locker rooms,’” said Jeremy Tedesco, a lawyer representing the families.

The suit, which challenges the Education Department’s authority to redefine the term sex in Title IX of U.S. law to include gender identity and to enforce it against schools, is the first of its kind, Tedesco told The Daily Signal.

The president of the group filing the lawsuit, Students and Parents for Privacy, said she and other Cook County parents with children in the school district decided legal action “was the only thing we could do at this point.”

“We tried,” she said, adding:

We did everything we could to work with the school district, and we were really hoping they would do the right thing and protect the privacy of all students, but when they chose not to, we felt we had no choice in order to protect the girls in the locker room.

The group’s president asked that her name not be published because of the sensitive nature of the case.

The issue began in December 2013, when Student A filed a complaint with the Education Department against Township High School District 211, based in the village of Palatine, Ill.

The complaint alleged that District 211 had discriminated against the transgender student on the basis of sex.

After completing an extensive investigation, the Education Department’s Office of Civil Rights said on Dec. 2 that Township High School District 211 was in violation of federal law for refusing to grant Student A full access to the girls’ locker room.

The school had granted Student A some accommodations, including changing the student’s name on official records, allowing the student on the girls sports teams, and granting the student access to the girls’ bathrooms. But District 211 drew the line at providing Student A unrestrained access to the girls’ locker rooms because of the privacy concerns of other girls using them. Instead, the school offered a private facility to Student A.

Daniel Cates, superintendent of District 211, said in an October newsletter:

The goal of the district in this matter is to protect the privacy rights of all students when changing clothes or showering before or after physical education and after-school activities, while also providing reasonable accommodations to meet the unique needs of individual students. Our responsibility is to provide an environment conducive to learning for all its 12,000+ students.

According to the Education Department’s investigation, the student felt “crushed” by the school district’s decision not to allow access to the locker rooms, “which she said indicated that the school did not accept her as a female.”

After the Education Department had completed its investigation, it ordered District 211 to grant Student A full access to the girls’ locker rooms and install privacy curtains inside those locker rooms, or else be at risk of losing federal financial assistance.

Thomas Petersen, director of community relations at Township High School District 211, said the school “could potentially lose up to $6 million in federal funding.”

Now, the 130 parents and students who are members of the group Students and Parents for Privacy are suing, arguing the Education Department lacks the authority to redefine sex in Title IX of U.S. law to include gender identity.

The parents and students also are asking for an injunction against the Justice Department, which has enforcement authority under Title IX, and an injunction against Township School District 211 from carrying out the Education Department’s demands.

The Christian legal aid group Alliance Defending Freedom is representing the parents and students, along with local support from lawyers at the Thomas More Society.

“What we’re attempting to do in this case is stop the Department of Education from redefining sex in Title IX to include gender identity,” Tedesco, senior counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom, told The Daily Signal. “It has no authority whatsoever to do that.”

Debate Over Title IX

Title IX is the federal law that bans discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded education program. Whether or not Title IX applies to transgender students is an issue that has been vigorously debated, with courts ruling on both sides.

Most recently, a federal appeals court in Richmond, Va., ruled that a transgender high school student who was born female but identifies as a male has the right to pursue discrimination charges against a school district for blocking access to the boys’ bathrooms.

The judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit cited the Obama administration’s interpretation of Title IX in issuing their 2-1 decision.

The Obama administration stated in a 2014 document that “Title IX’s sex discrimination prohibition extends to claims of discrimination.”

Tedesco called the ruling in Virginia a “complete outlier,” arguing that other courts have ruled the opposite way:

There’s been several courts that have addressed the question of whether Title IX applies to and protects against gender identity discrimination, and all those courts up to the 4th Circuit’s decision have said it does not.

If Americans want to add additional protections for gender identity, Tedesco said, it’s the job of Congress—not the Education Department—to make those changes. He said:

If Congress wants to redefine sex to include gender identity—if they want to add gender identity as a protected class under Title IX—they can do that through the regular lawmaking process. But Congress has rejected it several times, so the Department of Education just comes in and makes it up and adds it to the law. That’s something they have no authority whatsoever to do. And now they’re running around the country and forcing essentially what is a new Department of Education rule against schools across the country.

Since 2010, Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., has proposed that Congress pass a measure that would provide protections for students from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Thus far, that legislation has failed.

Township High School District 211 is the first school in the nation that the Education Department found in violation of Title IX over transgender issues. Now, it’s the first school in the country to face a lawsuit of this kind.

The Path Forward

In December, six female students attempted to explain to the District 211 school board why they were uncomfortable with allowing Student A into their locker room.

“Although we will never fully understand your personal struggle,” the girls said, addressing the transgender student, “please understand that we, too, all are experiencing personal struggles that need to be respected.”

The president of Students and Parents for Privacy said she supports accommodations for Student A that balance the student’s interests with the rest of the student body.

“We understand why Student A doesn’t want to be in the boys’ locker room,” she said. “We get it. But the girls’ locker room isn’t the answer either. We believe in accommodation, but we don’t believe in an accommodation that hurts other students.”

Student A, who is represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, said in an earlier press release that using a separate locker room “stigmatized me, often making me feel like I was not a ‘normal person.’”

At the December school board meeting, one speaker called the old policy “institutionalized segregation.” Others brought up the high rates of suicide and depression for transgender men and women.

The head of the privacy group, who has children in the school district, said the group cares about Student A but is asking for fairness. She said:

We truly do care about these children who struggle with gender identity, and these children are welcome in my home. All I ask is that the respect go both ways. That’s what we’re not seeing. We’re just seeing demands.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, hinges on the idea that the school can and should make accommodations for Student A, but those accommodations shouldn’t violate the privacy and safety rights of other students.

Absent the lawsuit, Tedesco suggested, there’s little chance of finding middle ground.

“The reality is, the folks driving this agenda on the other side from us won’t accept anything other than full access to the opposite-sex restroom and locker room as the solution,” the families’ lawyer said, adding:

And what happened at District 211 is proof positive of that. They gave Student A accommodation after accommodation after accommodation, and ultimately the [Education Department] said no, full access is the only thing that’s going to solve the issue.

(For more from the author of “50 Families Sue Over Illinois High School’s Transgender Bathroom Policy” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

My Gut: Trump Beats Hillary in Landslide

Hold your horses, Trump supporters. Hold your horses. When I say, “We’ll examine what went wrong,” come on. You know exactly what I’m talking about, from the standpoint of Cruz supporters. They’re the ones trying to figure out what went wrong today. They are looking for explanations, and I’m sure they have their own at the same time. But we’ll get into all that. Let me give you one little thing: My instinctive feeling right now is that Trump is gonna win, beat Hillary badly, that it could be landslide proportions.

I still don’t think people understand why Trump won this. I don’t think they understand at all the reason people support Trump. And the deeper people are entrenched in politics, and the more they are accustomed to the templates and the handbooks and the theories and the playbooks, the less they’re gonna understand it. The more they try to plug Donald Trump and his campaign and his personality into the professional politician candidate playbook that they use, the farther and farther from the truth they are going to get.

I’ve tried to help. During the course of this entire campaign, I’ve gone to great lengths to try to explain to people what it is about Trump, why he has his supporters, why they support him, and what you have to do to separate them from Trump. Basically, you can’t. That’s the bottom line. There’s nothing any professional politician can do. They’ve done everything that they knew how to beat a candidate. They threw everything they had at Trump. I mean, the negative ads that they ran against him, these #NeverTrump guys and their PACs in all these states?

In indiana alone the amount of money spent on negative ads against Trump? And it didn’t work. And in their world, negative ads always work. So they’re out there scratching their heads today. You’ve got #NeverTrump people saying, “I said I was never gonna vote for Trump, and I’m never gonna vote for Trump — and I mean it.” You’ve got some people thinking about looking for third-party candidate. Others, it’s a matter of honor, a matter of principle, to never vote for Trump. But they’re caught between that and Hillary Clinton becoming president. (Read more from “My Gut: Trump Beats Hillary in Landslide” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Muslim Women Sue Muslim Shop Owner for Discriminating Against Muslims?

The preamble of our Declaration of Independence has been flipped on its head. The self-evident truth that all men are created equal in terms of inalienable rights of life, liberty and property has been replaced with the pagan lie that special classes are to be protected and have the right to violate other people’s property rights. When Christians are business owners, they are forced to serve individuals that engage in behavior contrary to their religious beliefs because homosexuals have become a protected class. Likewise, when patrons of a business are Muslims, they have the right to violate the rules and force the business owner to accommodate them.

Latest case in point? The Urth Caffé in Laguna Beach California. Seven Muslim women are suing the restaurant’s owner for allegedly kicking them out of the restaurant before they were finished eating simply because they were “visibly Muslim.” Who is helping organize this frivolous lawsuit? You guessed it…The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), which was found by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to be the financing arm of Hamas in North America.

While the media will never report the details of this case, the American Freedom Law Center (AFLC), which is representing the defendants and is countersuing the plaintiffs, shed some light on what happened the evening of April 22:

The claim that these women were asked to leave the caffé because they were wearing hijabs is laughable. That night, as every Friday night, a large number of young people, including a majority of whom are Muslim and of Arab descent, make up the base of Urth Caffe’s customers. Not surprisingly, many of these customers are women wearing hijabs. None of these other Muslim women were asked to leave. The women who now claim victim status were not asked to leave, but only to abide by the caffé’s policy to give up their high-demand outside patio table after 45 minutes to allow other customers, including those wearing hijabs, to enjoy the experience.”

As the AFLC notes, the person who originally called the police on the rowdy and abusive crowd was a Muslim co-owner of the restaurant. Moreover, just to get a sense as to where this is coming from, one of the plaintiffs is a known Palestinian agitator.

Even if the Caffé wins this case, it reflects the challenges of business owners in this society where all men are indeed not treated equally. As the legal profession continues to travel down this slippery slope with anti-discrimination laws, they empower street agitators who happen to be of a specific identity to use their protected status to violate the property rights and rules of private businesses. Sometimes the businesses win after paying hefty legal fees; other times they are forced to settle. Restaurants in particular are hit hard because they have a narrow margin of profit.

The notion that CAIR, an unindicted coconspirator in funding Hamas, could have standing to sue a private business for discrimination in itself demonstrates the breakdown of our legal system and the need to fix the anti-discrimination statutes.

Now, let’s juxtapose this to the story from last week when the Colorado Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal from Christian business owners who were forced to bake a cake for a gay wedding. Here are the details from the Daily Signal:

Because of his Christian belief that marriage is between one man and one woman, [Jack] Phillips in 2012 declined to bake a cake celebrating the same-sex wedding of Charlie Craig and David Mullins.

“There’s just certain events, certain cakes I don’t make,” Phillips told The Daily Signal in an extensive phone interview from his shop last August. “That was one of them.”

After the two men filed a discrimination complaint against Phillips and Masterpiece Cakeshop, the Colorado Civil Rights Commission ruled that the bakery violated the state’s anti-discrimination policy.

In August, the Colorado Court of Appeals ordered that Phillips and his staff must bake cakes for gay marriages. The state Supreme Court on Monday declined to review that order.

The state chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union praised the high court’s decision.

Let’s be clear: an American has an inalienable right to work his property and business in accordance with his beliefs. This is not only rooted in conventional property rights, but in conscience, which Madison referred to as the “most sacred of property rights.” On the other hand, an American does not have a fundamental right to someone else’s involuntary servitude nor does he have the right to disrupt the rules and decorum of someone’s restaurant. That individual may dislike those business owners and has the right to organize a boycott, but one’s identity does not grant them an extra layer of entitlement.

We’ve spent months focusing on the pettiness of this media-driven election, but these are the issues that have been ignored. Yet these are the issues that are undermining the very foundation and impetus of our Founding. (For more from the author of “Muslim Women Sue Muslim Shop Owner for Discriminating Against Muslims?” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.