Texas Sen. Ted Cruz on Monday called on GOP presidential front-runner Donald Trump to ask The New York Times to release a recording of an off-the-record meeting with its editorial board at which he is speculated to have said he might soften his tone on immigration once elected.
Buzzfeed Editor-in-Chief Ben Smith reported earlier Monday that the tape has achieved “near-mythical status” within the Times’ newsroom, and is believed to contain audio of Trump telling the board during a January 5 meeting that he is using the language of deporting 11 million illegal immigrants and building a border wall as bargaining chips in negotiations.
Smith cites a recent column by Gail Collins, who attended the meeting, in which she writes:
“The most optimistic analysis of Trump as a presidential candidate is that he just doesn’t believe in positions, except the ones you adopt for strategic purposes when you’re making a deal. So you obviously can’t explain how you’re going to deport 11 million undocumented immigrants, because it’s going to be the first bid in some future monster negotiation session.”
The last line isn’t mere speculation, Smith said, citing people familiar with the recording and the transcript. (Read more from “Cruz Demands Release of NYT Tape Showing Trump Scamming Conservatives on Immigration” HERE)
That was radio host Glenn Beck’s assessment Friday of Marco Rubio’s continued presence in the Republican presidential race.
The Florida senator is following what Beck called “marching orders” from Republican leaders to create a brokered convention in which deals must be made to give any candidate the 1,237 delegates needed to win.
“There’s no pathway for him to win, there’s only a pathway for a brokered convention. And that leads to civil war. And that leads to more disenfranchisement,” he said, noting that Rubio has said his campaign is about amassing delegates, not winning states.
“If Marco Rubio had, let’s say, 300 and Trump had 1,000, you would then have Rubio go to Trump and say, ‘Put me on the ticket, and I’ll get — I’ll put you over the top,’” Beck said, giving an example of how a brokered convention could play out. “I believe that Marco Rubio is playing for vice president now or a brokered convention to where he can wield that kind of power, because there’s no winning” . . .
Beck said that if neither Rubio or Cruz do well Tuesday, “neither … can win the presidency and take the nomination from Donald Trump.” (Read more from “Glenn Beck Just Revealed the One Reason He Thinks Marco Rubio Is Staying in the Race” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/6239414292_05ab91c99d_b.jpg6831024Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-02-29 23:22:162016-04-11 10:52:06Glenn Beck Just Revealed the One Reason He Thinks Marco Rubio Is Staying in the Race
Hillary Clinton received a small victory on Monday when the State Department announced that the Intelligence Community’s office of the inspector general “was not correct” in its initial assessment that an email she received in 2009 contained “Top Secret” information.
The email in question — which Clinton received on July 3, 2009 and discusses North Korea’s nuclear program — will be re-classified as “Secret,” according to State Department spokesman John Kirby.
He said it will be published on the agency’s website Monday evening, along with 3,800 new pages of Clinton’s emails. The release marks the 14th and final production of Clinton’s emails in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by Vice News’ Jason Leopold.
“The document does not contain ‘Top Secret’ information,” Kirby told reporters Monday. “At the request of the Intelligence Community a limited amount of information in this document has been provisionally upgraded to ‘Secret’” . . .
The State Department and Clinton first disputed the email’s classification in July, when Intelligence Community inspector general I. Charles McCullough III informed the State Department of its assessment. (Read more from “State Department Just Made a Huge Claim About Clinton Email Scandal” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/19644280779_48b2229001_o-1.jpg10801920Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-02-29 23:11:232016-04-11 10:52:06State Department Just Made a Huge Claim About Clinton Email Scandal
Nearly 20,000 Bay State Democrats have fled the party this winter, with thousands doing so to join the Republican ranks, according to the state’s top elections official.
Secretary of State William Galvin said more than 16,300 Democrats have shed their party affiliation and become independent voters since Jan. 1, while nearly 3,500 more shifted to the MassGOP ahead of tomorrow’s “Super Tuesday” presidential primary.
Galvin called both “significant” changes that dwarf similar shifts ahead of other primary votes, including in 2000, when some Democrats flocked from the party in order to cast a vote for Sen. John McCain in the GOP primary.
The primary reason? Galvin said his “guess” is simple: “The Trump phenomenon,” a reference to GOP frontrunner Donald Trump, who polls show enjoying a massive lead over rivals Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz and others among Massachusetts Republican voters.
“The tenor of the Republican campaign has been completely different from what we’ve seen in prior Republican presidential campaigns,” Galvin said. “You have to look no farther than the viewership for some of the televised debates. (Read more from “Amid Trump Surge, Nearly 20,000 Voters Quit Democratic Party” HERE)
Horrific new details of how a nanny beheaded a four-year-old girl and paraded through the streets of Moscow with her severed head have been revealed.
The woman, dressed in a burka, threatened to blow herself up as she walked near Oktyabrskoye Pole metro station holding up the little girl’s head.
Investigators claim she murdered the girl, who is believed to have learning difficulties, after starting a fire at the child’s family home in a block of flats.
[Warning Extremely Graphic Video]
The nanny, Gyulchehra Bobokulova, 38, from Uzbekistan, has been arrested.
It is now known that the beheaded remains of the girl, identified as Anastasia (Nastya) Meshcheryakova, were discovered inside her cot. Her body had been dressed in her night clothes, consisting of a T-shirt and shorts. (Read more from “Muslim Babysitter Decapitates Child, Parades Through Street With Little Girl’s Head” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/Gyulchehra-Bobokulova-4.jpg300500kathleenhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngkathleen2016-02-29 23:07:252016-04-11 10:52:07Muslim Babysitter Decapitates Child, Parades Through Street With Little Girl’s Head [+video]
Trump is clearly the person to beat, but both Cruz and Rubio are keeping it close for second – making it a three man race . . .
OH Gov. John Kasich and one day future governor or senator or congressman Ben Carson have no shot at earning the nomination at this point. (Read more from “Cruz Demands Release of NYT Tape Showing Trump Scamming Conservatives on Immigration” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/23474955300_2e8252dd29_o.jpg10801920Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-02-29 23:06:212016-04-11 10:52:07The One Tweet That Perfectly Sums up the 2016 Election
The Republican presidential race could effectively be decided by the votes of millions of Christians across the South, many of whom would call themselves “evangelical” or “strongly pro-life.” Yet polls show that many of them, perhaps a majority, are supporting Donald Trump. So are many of my fiercely pro-life Catholic friends. Is such support a canny calculation about who’d be the most effective commander — not pastor — in chief (as Jerry Falwell, Jr., tells his people)? An angry reaction to years of sitting at the back of the GOP bus (per Rusty Reno)? A moral scandal (see Erick Erickson)?
There are elements of truth in each account, but there is something much deeper going on. I’m a longtime critic of Donald Trump — I was quoted in the Daily Beast story that called him “Planned Parenthood’s favorite Republican” — because I do not trust his character or his promises. I don’t think he means what he says. He is a salesmen, who is crassly using the legitimate fears of Americans to sell us a presidency that would deliver even less than his scam Trump University. He won’t full-throatedly denounce the hateful race zealot David Duke. I don’t think he’ll even build a wall.
But I must speak up in defense of some of Trump’s supporters and their motives, if only to help conservatives reach out to them more effectively. And the time for that is short.
Donald Trump is part of a worldwide reaction among Westerners — Christian, non-Christian, and quasi-Christian alike — against the hijacking and perversion of Christianity by the left. The Gospel call to promote real social justice, be kind to the needy, and look past race and nation, has been stolen and replaced with a milk-and-water humanitarian liberalism that George Soros could endorse. Indeed Soros funds it, pouring millions into leftist Christian groups that promote his leftist, transnational goals — from bigger government to lax immigration and “marriage equality” laws.
The worst instance I’ve seen in America of this distortion of Christian morals came from a Catholic, Chicago’s Archbishop Blaise Cupich, but I’m sure that readers could furnish plenty of Protestant examples. When the gruesome videos exposing Planned Parenthood’s profiteering in unborn children’s organs were released, Cupich wrote an op-ed where he smooshed together this ghoulish greed with utterly unrelated issues, and treated them as equal:
While commerce in the remains of defenseless children is particularly repulsive, we should be no less appalled by the indifference toward the thousands of people who die daily for lack of decent medical care; who are denied rights by a broken immigration system and by racism; who suffer in hunger, joblessness and want; who pay the price of violence in gun-saturated neighborhoods; or who are executed by the state in the name of justice. [emphasis added]
How could Christians take seriously warnings from someone like Cupich about the real excesses and extremes of Donald Trump, when he has worn out his voice crying “wolf”? I suspect that something similar is happening in Protestant circles, that real conservative Christians whose positions are perfectly compatible with the Gospel, rightly understood, suspect that those who warn them against Donald Trump are little Baptist or Methodist equivalents of Archbishop Cupich.
Nor is Cupich a lonely voice. The official statements of the U.S. Catholic bishops are no more balanced in their treatment of immigration, and are echoed by the rhetoric of (curiously well-funded) evangelical groups that take the same liberal positions. Tell someone he is not a Christian — not that he’s mistaken or misguided but that he is not a Christian, as Pope Francis sort of said of Donald Trump — because he opposes granting amnesty to lawbreakers, then giving them the vote and welfare benefits and affirmative action preferences. Tell him that for long enough, and eventually that man will throw up his hands and say, “Fine! If Christianity is what you say it is, maybe it’s just for church and not for politics. Because that’s just plain crazy.”
But Christianity is not crazy. Its politics aren’t utopian, and the demands it makes of us as citizens can never conflict with the verdict of prudence and justice. To say otherwise is to suggest that the God who made our reason never wanted us to use it, but to blindly follow emotion — or succumb to emotional blackmail. The method that Christians since the early Church — from Augustine to Thomas Aquinas, from Luther to William Wilberforce — have used to discern the meaning of what Jesus taught us in the Gospel is to apply the test of reason. That is how we know that Jesus did not really call for universal celibacy, or pacifism in the face of foreign invasion, or communism instead of private property.
Because He loved us, He knew that His Father had made us “good,” and that even our Fall had not completely destroyed our instincts — for instance, the urge to “be fruitful and multiply,” or our need to defend our families from violence, or our duty as prudent stewards of Creation. To say otherwise is to suggest that the heretic Marcion was right, that Jesus came to free us from the corrupt creation of a wicked or foolish “God,” rather than to reconcile us to our loving Father, and His.
We see the same revolt against pseudo-Christian utopian flapdoodle all across Europe, in the patriotic parties that are rising against their nation’s reckless elites, which are dissipating their democratic sovereignty and flooding their countries with bigoted Muslim colonists — some of whom rape women in Europe’s streets. Such parties are routinely and fiercely condemned by most Christian clergy in those countries, who echo Pope Francis’ utopian rhetoric on immigration — which differs from Catholic doctrine. Some of those Europeans, tragically, are letting their clueless pastors drive them out of the church altogether, and embracing crass neo-pagan movements, with names like “Soldiers of Odin.” This is a double win for the devil: disfigure the Gospel to make it seem repulsive, then harvest the souls of those who walk away.
The way that leftists unwittingly do this devil’s work is to take some element of Christian ethics and grossly exaggerate it, cut it off from any context, and make of it an idol. Hence “compassion,” “inclusiveness,” “social justice” or “equality” take the place of the person of Jesus and become the object of worship. C.S. Lewis warned against this temptation in Mere Christianity and The Screwtape Letters. In its fullest form, such political idolatry can be seen in Liberation Theology, which perverts the church into a revolutionary Marxist vanguard.
Of course, the devil is nothing if not subtle, and he can play both sides of the spectrum. Millions of Germans perverted the Gospel on Hitler’s behalf, adopting a “German Christianity” that pretended Jesus was an “Aryan” who came to save us from the wicked Old Testament Jews (there’s Marcion again). No doubt there are some Americans today calling themselves Christians who really care more about their race, or social class, or economic well-being. And some of them are voting for Donald Trump. But it’s unfair, futile, and frankly un-Christian to pretend that this accounts for all of them. Donald Trump is a symptom of a much deeper disease. If we don’t root it out of our churches, no one will listen to their political voice anymore, and no one should. (For more from the author of “Trump-Voting Christians: Retribution for Liberal Pastors Who Cry ‘Wolf’?” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/16677804412_b704ac09eb_b.jpg6831024Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-02-29 23:06:182016-04-11 10:52:07Trump-Voting Christians: Retribution for Liberal Pastors Who Cry ‘Wolf’?
Rep. Blake Farenthold (R-Texas) and 50 other House Republicans sent a letter to U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein Thursday requesting that he clarify that the U.N. is not “calling for changes to laws protecting the human rights of unborn children” in a statement the commissioner made calling for wider access to “reproductive health services” in response to the Zika virus affecting several Latin American countries.
The congressmen wrote that they were “troubled to read the United Nations Commission on Human Rights February 5, 2016 press release on the recent spread of the Zika virus and its implications for abortion practices.”
The statement from Zeid’s office emphasized that in light of the Zika outbreak “laws and policies that restrict access to sexual and reproductive health services in contravention of international standards, must be repealed…”
The members wrote that they are “concerned” by what the commissioner’s statement “may suggest.”
“We believe the Zika virus should be a time for thoughtful deliberation as local and national governments determine the best policies to curb the spread of this disease,” they wrote. “It should not be an occasion to exploit a genuine public health crisis to advance a political agenda to overturn laws of many nations protective of life at all stages of development.” (Read more from “GOP Congressmen to UN: Don’t Use Zika to ‘Overturn Laws of Many Nations Protective of Life at All Stages of Development'” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/mosquito-1318443083oGd.jpg461615Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-02-29 23:05:342016-04-11 10:52:07GOP Congressmen to UN: Don’t Use Zika to ‘Overturn Laws of Many Nations Protective of Life at All Stages of Development’
The US Army is planning to deploy the first laser weapons in 2023, it has been revealed.
Mary J. Miller, deputy assistant secretary of the Army for Research and Technology, told the House Armed Services Committee’s Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities ‘I believe we’re very close,’ when asked how close the Army is to developing offensive and defensive directed-energy weapons.
She said the programmes would be extensively tested as the Army wants to understand the lasers’ full capabilities ‘before we offer it to a Soldier’ . . .
‘We have to make sure the lasers work and do the full set of scopes against the threats we project. And those threats include the counter-rockets, counter-artillery and counter-mortar as well as [Unmanned Aerial Vehicle] and cruise missile threats.’
Miller explained that the Army wants to understand the lasers’ full capabilities ‘before we offer it to a Soldier.’ (Read more from “US Army Will Have Laser Weapons by 2023 as Research Bosses Say Killer Technology Is ‘Very Close'” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/Flickr_-_The_U.S._Army_-_Marksmanship_training_1.jpg10131519Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-02-29 23:05:092016-04-11 10:52:07US Army Will Have Laser Weapons by 2023 as Research Bosses Say Killer Technology Is ‘Very Close’
There is more than one con man in this race for president.
Most certainly we can say that Trump’s supporters erroneously think he is Jeff Sessions on immigration and a conservative on some other issues, but even most of Rubio’s supporters have no idea how committed their candidate is to open borders. Rubio gets up at every debate and feigns outrage over the border and completely lies about his past. He has even said that his amnesty bill was never designed to pass.
Anyone who fought this issue at the time remembers that Rubio promoted this bill with a presidential campaign-style media battle. The notion that he didn’t fight for open borders is as false as the notion that Rubio was responsible for getting rid of the “risk corridors” bailout in Obamacare. Now the New York Times is reporting that Rubio and Schumer collaborated with Fox News to lie to conservatives about the immigration bill in a full-throttle effort to get the bill passed:
A few weeks after Senator Marco Rubio joined a bipartisan push for an immigration overhaul in 2013, he arrived alongside Senator Chuck Schumer at the executive dining room of News Corporation’s Manhattan headquarters for dinner.
Their mission was to persuade Rupert Murdoch, the owner of the media empire, and Roger Ailes, the chairman and chief executive of its Fox News division, to keep the network’s on-air personalities from savaging the legislation and give it a fighting chance at survival.
Mr. Murdoch, an advocate of immigration reform, and Mr. Ailes, his top lieutenant and the most powerful man in conservative television, agreed at the Jan. 17, 2013, meeting to give the senators some breathing room.
Rubio left no stone unturned in trying to champion Obama’s immigration agenda and register 20 million new Democratic voters at a time when Obama was inviting the newest border crisis.
Unfortunately, the one man who actually fought amnesty is now sandwiched between two con men that refuse to follow the honorable example of Jeb Bush and run on the veracity of their true convictions.
Let’s remember, no candidate will ever run in a primary openly supporting amnesty, lest they suffer the fate of Jeb Bush.
Well, who better than the owner of Fox News himself to reveal to us who he trusts to implement their agenda, the agenda revealed in the New York Times article.
Both "establishment" Republicans and Trump need to cool it and close ranks to fight real enemy. Trump, Rubio, Kasich could all win general.
It comes as no surprise that Murdoch would cheer on Rubio and Kasich. But notice how he added Trump to the list of those he deems acceptable in a general election. Guess who was left off that list? The one man the entire establishment hates and views as an existential threat to their existence: Ted Cruz.
It’s up to conservatives to be discerning as to which candidate will actually remain faithful to the conservative message the day after the primaries are over. Anyone who is tired of the political establishment and its puppet masters should look carefully at the actions of Fox leadership; it won’t be too hard to ascertain whom they really fear.
Pro tip: If the people we are fighting don’t really fear your candidate, they probably have good reason. (For more from the author of “Rubio/Fox News Axis Exposed” please click HERE)