2020 Candidate: U.S. Government ‘Is Hiding the Truth’ About 9/11 Terror Attacks

Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard said during a Fox News interview on Thursday night that the United States government is “hiding the truth” about the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Gabbard, a Representative from Hawaii, told Tucker Carlson that she believes that the U.S. government is covering up Saudi Arabia’s role in the attacks which killed thousands of Americans.

“This story that we’re hearing from the families of those who were killed on 9/11 pushes this issue to the forefront where, for so long, leaders in our government have said, ‘well, Saudi Arabia is our great ally, they’re a partner in counterterrorism’ — turning a blind eye or completely walking away from the reality that Saudi Arabia time and again, has proven to be the opposite,” Gabbard said.

“They’re undermining our national security interests … they are the number one exporter of this Wahhabi extremist ideology,” Gabbard continued. “They’re a fertile recruiting ground for terrorists, like al Qaeda and ISIS around the world. They’re directly providing arms and assistance to al Qaeda, in places like Yemen, and in Syria.”

“And as we are seeing here, it is our government, our own government that is hiding the truth … and the many other families of those who were killed on 9/11,” Gabbard concluded. “For what? Where do the loyalties really lie?” (Read more from “Tulsi Gabbard: U.S. Government ‘Is Hiding the Truth’ About 9/11 Terror Attacks” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

GOP Sent Moving Boxes to Democrats in Competitive Races After Impeachment Vote

There were some reports that House Democrats didn’t have the votes. The 25 or so Democrats who won in Trump districts know the polling. In battleground states, Trump’s impeachment isn’t popular. These folks didn’t win their 2018 races by massive margins. One bad move or vote could sink them, but those concerns were extinguished yesterday when House Democrats mustered 232 votes for this coup attempt—sorry, I mean impeachment push. Pelosi must’ve promised these members all the cover ad support they need, along with the pin number to the Democrats’ 2020 war chest. Still, that didn’t stop the National Republican Congressional Committee from sending moving boxes to these competitive districts represented by Democrats with a simple message: ‘Get packing’ (via USA Today):

The National Republican Congressional Committee sent packing boxes to several House Democrats who represent battleground states to signify they’ll need them as “moving boxes” next November, prompting Capitol Hill police to investigate them as suspicious packages.

The boxes were delivered outside the offices of Reps. Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.), Jennifer Wexton (D-Va.), Conor Lamb (D-Pa.) and others to indicate they will not be in office much longer because of their participation into the impeachment investigation of President Donald Trump.

(Read more from “GOP Sent Moving Boxes to Democrats in Competitive Races After Impeachment Vote” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

New Report Shows How Much Americans’ Taxes Would Have to Go up to Pay for Medicare for All

The following is an excerpt from Blaze Media’s Capitol Hill Brief email newsletter:

Unless you’re completely detached from reality, you know that the Medicare for All proposals being tossed around among 2020 Democratic presidential candidates would have a heavy impact on the American taxpayer and economy. A new report from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget offers an idea of how heavy that impact would be.

“There is not enough annual income available among higher earners to finance the full cost of Medicare for All,” the report says, noting that lawmakers will have to find other ways to pay for it, which will likely mean raising taxes on the middle class. The report says there are a few different ways to foot the bill, such as doubling all individual income tax rates, imposing a new 32 percent payroll tax, or increasing the cost of goods and services by 42 percent through a value-added tax, just to name a few.

So, for those pushing the proposal out on the campaign trail, the question is (or at least ought to be) which kind of massive tax hike they think will be the most palatable to voters who don’t live in safe Democratic territory. No wonder some vulnerable House Democrats are nervous about how a fight over Medicare for All might affect their re-election prospects.

(For more from the author of “New Report Shows How Much Americans’ Taxes Would Have to Go up to Pay for Medicare for All” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Nancy Pelosi Expects Public Impeachment Hearings to Start This Month

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said Friday that she expects public hearings in the House’s impeachment probe against President Donald Trump to begin later this month.

In a discussion with Bloomberg reporters and editors on Friday, Pelosi said, “I would assume there would be public hearings in November,” but also said that any case investigators bring against the president “has to be ironclad.” The speaker, however, did not commit to a timeline for impeachment proceedings or for when the probe would move out of the current phase of closed-door testimony, saying that depositions would continue as long as they prove to be “productive.”

“I don’t know what the timetable will be,” she said. “The truth will set us free.”

The clandestine nature of the impeachment probe so far has drawn considerable criticism from congressional Republicans, who argue that the testimony from witnesses should be given publicly, rather than behind closed doors. However, those defending the current stage of the probe liken it to a grand jury or special counsel investigation.

“The special counsels in the Nixon and Clinton impeachments conducted their investigations in private and we must initially do the same,” Schiff wrote in a letter to colleagues earlier this month.

There’s also the question of how long the overall process is expected to take. While House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., has said that he would like to see the chamber finish up its impeachment work by the end of the year, Pelosi wouldn’t rule out the possibility of running over into the 2020 election year, noting what she called “a mountain of concerns to be brought up,” as well as the possibility that other leads might come up the course of the investigation.

Pelosi also told Bloomberg that the outcome of this process isn’t a forgone conclusion, saying “we have not made any decisions on if the president will be impeached.”

The remarks came a day after Pelosi banged the gavel on a House vote to pass a resolution codifying the impeachment probe that she announced over a month beforehand. (For more from the author of “Nancy Pelosi Expects Public Impeachment Hearings to Start This Month” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Ex-CIA Director “Grateful” for Deep State’s Role in Taking Down Trump; Pelosi Now Colluding to Change 2020 Results With Impeachment Probe

Steve Scalise: Pelosi Using Impeachment Probe to Influence 2020 Presidential Election

By Breitbart. House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA) told reporters Thursday that House Democrat leaders are using the partisan impeachment inquiry to help decide who will be the next president of the United States, suggesting the probe will interfere with the 2020 elections.

While briefing reporters in the wake of the House Democrat’s approval, along party lines, of the impeachment inquiry resolution, Scalise declared:

If you look at where we are at right now, we’re at an important point in history. Clearly, there are people that we serve with that don’t like the results of the 2016 election — that’s their prerogative — but the country next year will be deciding who our president is going to be. It should not be Nancy Pelosi and a small group of people that she selects that get to determine who’s going to be our president.

He went on to say that Democrats are not interested in getting to the bottom of the allegations that triggered the impeachment effort. Instead, their focus is solely on removing President Donald Trump from office and overturning the results of the 2016 elections, Scalise indicated. . .

They don’t really want to get to the truth. They want to remove a sitting president. In fact, the author of the articles of impeachment [Democrat Rep. Al Green from Texas] said, ‘if they don’t impeach the president, he will get re-elected.’ Now that’s not why we have impeachment.

(Read more from “Steve Scalise: Pelosi Using Impeachment Probe to Influence 2020 Presidential Election” HERE)

___________________________________________________________

Ex-Acting CIA Boss Expresses Gratitude for ‘Deep State’ Involvement in Impeachment Inquiry

By Fox News. Former Acting CIA Director John McLaughlin indicated on Wednesday that he was grateful for the “deep state’s” role in prompting the impeachment inquiry into President Trump.

CBS reporter Margaret Brennan had noted to McLaughlin that the origin of the impeachment inquiry likely furthered Trump’s concerns about the “deep state”.

“There is something unique you have to agree that now that the impeachment inquiry is underway, sparked by a complaint from someone within the intelligence community, it feeds the president’s concern, an often-used term about a ‘deep state’ being there to take him out,” she said.

“Well, you know, thank God for the ‘deep state’,” McLaughlin responded, provoking laughter and applause. (Read more from “Ex-Acting CIA Boss Expresses Gratitude for ‘Deep State’ Involvement in Impeachment Inquiry” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Halloween Surprise: 96-Year-Old Record Snowfall Across U.S.

A storm that made many areas of the Midwest feel more like winter than fall shattered a 96-year-old winter weather record in Chicago.

The historic storm system— which brought snow and cold over the Colorado Rockies this week— made it to the Midwest on Thursday morning, unleashing moderate-to-heavy snowfall in northeastern Kansas, eastern Iowa, Illinois, and southern Wisconsin. . .

Chicago experienced its earliest snow day of the year where an inch or more of snow fell since October 20, 1989, and smashed its previous record of 0.7 inches at Chicago O’Hare International Airport on Wednesday with a whopping 1.2 inches of snow. . .

The city of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, also set a new weather forecast record on Thursday at 7 a.m. when 1.1. inches of snowfall was measured.

Its previous record was 0.4 inches in 1926. Meanwhile, in Wisconsin’s state capitol of Madison, another snowfall record for October was shattered when a total of 5.5 inches was reported on Thursday morning. (Read more from “Halloween Surprise: 96-Year-Old Record Snowfall Across U.S.” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Dozens of Conservative Groups File Ethics Complaint Against Nancy Pelosi Over Impeachment Process

Dozens of conservative groups have banded together to bring a formal ethics complaint against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., alleging “abuse of power, misuse of House resources, and false statements to the public and to the media” related to her impeachment efforts against President Donald Trump.

Filed Wednesday, the six-page complaint to the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) claims that Pelosi “has violated the Official Code of Conduct of the House of Representatives in the following specific instances, establishing a pattern of conduct that reflects discreditably on the U.S. House of Representatives, and she has abused her power as Speaker of the House of Representatives in her determination to conduct impeachment proceedings against the President of the United States.”

The complaint points to House Rule XXIII, which outlines the code of conduct for members. Specifically, it highlights sections requiring that members “behave at all times in a manner that shall reflect creditably on the House” and “adhere to the spirit and the letter of the Rules of the House and to the rules of duly constituted committees thereof.”

The complaint was led by Tea Party Patriots’ Jenny Beth Martin, signed by representatives of 40 different conservative groups, and sent to the OCE’s board chairman David Skaggs. It claims that the speaker has “weaponized impeachment” through her actions.

“In launching her ‘official’ impeachment inquiry without benefit of a vote of the full House of Representatives and without indicating anything remotely qualifying as ‘treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors’ that is the subject of the inquiry, Speaker Pelosi has weaponized impeachment,” the complaint reads. “She and her Democratic colleagues are using the impeachment process as a weapon of partisan political battle, rather than as the means to defend the Constitution our Framers meant it to be.”

In fact, the complaint goes so far as to make the case that the House’s impeachment effort is a separation of powers violation.

Citing foreign policy powers given by the Constitution to the executive branch and the Senate, the groups argue that Pelosi “has no business examining or investigating the president’s legitimate exercise of his authority to determine the foreign and national security policy of the United States” in the first place.

The groups also argue that the resolution put forward this week to affirm the impeachment investigation after the fact is “is inadequate at this late stage” to address the concerns the process has raised so far.

“This is the constitutional equivalent of having the referees arrive and take their positions when the game is already halfway over,” the complaint says. “If she now understands that before going any further, the full House of Representatives must make its impeachment inquiry legitimate by the casting of votes, she is tacitly admitting that what came before is illegitimate. Consequently, all ‘evidence’ gleaned during this portion of the ‘investigation’ must be discarded for the sake of fairness.”

For those reasons, the groups ask the OCE to “immediately launch an inquiry into Speaker Pelosi’s misconduct.”

In a tweet about the complaint, Martin pointed those interested in getting involved with other such efforts to a “Trump Defense Team” page on TPP’s website.

(For more from the author of “Dozens of Conservative Groups File Ethics Complaint Against Nancy Pelosi Over Impeachment Process” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

A ‘Failed Legacy:’ Tulsi Gabbard Blisters Hillary Clinton In Op-Ed

Failed 2016 presidential contender Hillary Clinton may have gone silent on Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI), the 2020 Democratic presidential contender whom Clinton suggested was a Russian plant designed to upend the upcoming election. Tulsi Gabbard, however, hasn’t forgotten their feud.

In a Wall Street Journal opinion piece published Wednesday, Gabbard says she is running for president in order to “undo Mrs. Clinton’s failed legacy,” citing her 2016 endorsement of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) against Clinton in the Democratic primary as proof she and Clinton have been in conflict for years.

Gabbard says that, in the years since Clinton’s last presidential run, she’s all but forgotten about Donald Trump’s chief rival but it’s now clear Clinton hasn’t forgotten about her. . .

“Whether Mrs. Clinton’s name is on the ballot or not, her foreign policy will be,” Gabbard wrote, adding that she’s battling a dozen other candidates who “adhere to her doctrine of acting as the world’s police, using the tools of war to overthrow governments we don’t like, wasting taxpayer dollars, costing American lives, causing suffering and destruction abroad, and undermining America’s security.”

Hillary Clinton has been silent in response, but her allies have not. Instead of hitting at Gabbard directly, Clinton associates have been conducting something of a whisper campaign, fomenting a concern among Democrats that Gabbard really is marshaling her troops for a third party bid — or at least a Democratic convention coup. (Read more from “A ‘Failed Legacy:’ Tulsi Gabbard Blisters Hillary Clinton in Op-Ed” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Trump Campaign Trolls Dems With ‘Witch Hunt’ Halloween Event

Along with “Fake News Media,” among President Trump’s favorite phrases is “Witch Hunt.” So what better theme for a Trump campaign Halloween party?

On Wednesday, the Trump campaign held a “Witch Hunt Party” in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania featuring social media stars Diamond and Silk, two of Trump’s most vocal supporters, Bloomberg’s Mario Parker reports.

The event was hosted by American Conservative Union Chairman Matt Schlapp and his wife, former White House Director of Strategic Communications Mercedes Schlapp, and held at the Spooky Nook Sports recreation center in Manheim, Parker notes. . .

“I think it’s been a witch hunt. The whole Russia collusion and anything before it and anything after it,” Lane told Parker. “It’s the swamp versus him. It’s the elite, the deep state.”

With reports about his campaign’s aptly themed Halloween party circulating, Trump slammed the Democrats’ “witch hunt” again on Thursday morning.

(Read more from “Trump Campaign Trolls Dems With ‘Witch Hunt’ Halloween Event” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Why Two Democrats Say They Voted Against the Impeachment Resolution

Some Democrats in the House represent districts that voted for President Trump in 2016. Two of those Democrats joined with House Republicans on Thursday in bipartisan opposition against the impeachment resolution. Rep. Jeff Van Drew (D-NJ) and Rep. Collin Peterson (D-MN) chose to put their constituents above their party’s abject hatred of the president.

In a statement about the House vote on Thursday, Rep. Collin Peterson called the impeachment a “mistake,” saying he would “not make a decision on impeachment until all the facts have been presented.”

This impeachment process continues to be hopelessly partisan. I have been hearing from my constituents on both sides of this matter for months, and the escalation of calls this past week just shows me how divided our country really is right now. I have some serious concerns with the way the closed-door depositions were run, and am skeptical that we will have a process that is open, transparent and fair. Without support from Senate Republicans, going down this path is a mistake. Today’s vote is both unnecessary, and widely misrepresented in the media and by Republicans as a vote on impeachment. I will not make a decision on impeachment until all the facts have been presented.”

(Read more from “Why Two Democrats Say They Voted Against the Impeachment Resolution” HERE)