Poll: Most Voters Expect Another Assassination Attempt Against Trump Before Election Day

A strong majority of likely U.S. voters believe there will be another assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump before Election Day, a new Rasmussen Reports poll found.

The first assassination attempt against Trump occurred on July 13 during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, when Thomas Matthew Crooks shot him in his right ear as he was speaking to the crowd, leaving his face bloodied. The second assassination attempt happened on Sept. 15, after suspect Ryan Wesley Routh was caught poking a gun out of the bushes onto Trump International Golf Course in West Palm Beach, Florida. Secret Service and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have been under intense scrutiny for their handling of both incidents.

“A man was recently charged in connection with an apparent assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump. How likely is it that there will be more assassination attempts against Trump between now and Election Day?” poll respondents were asked.

The survey found that 65 percent of respondents believe it is “likely” that there will be more assassination attempts against Trump before Election Day, including 32 percent who believe it is “very likely.” In contrast, 21 percent do not believe another attempt is likely, and 14 percent are not sure.

Majorities of every political category believe it is at least “somewhat likely” that there will be more attempts on Trump’s life, including 75 percent of Republicans, 56 percent of Democrats, and 64 percent of unaffiliated voters. (Read more from “Poll: Most Voters Expect Another Assassination Attempt Against Trump Before Election Day” HERE)

State Pulls 747,000 People off of Voter Registration Rolls

The North Carolina State Board of Elections has removed over 747,000 people from its list of registered voters with less than six weeks until Election Day.

The records were purged from the state’s voter registration rolls over the past 20 months, according to an NCSBE press release published Thursday.

“The county boards follow careful policies to ensure that only ineligible records are removed, not those of eligible voters,” the release reads.

Three of the top reasons for removal were that the voter was determined to have been deceased, had duplicate registrations due to moving within the state, or had garnered an “inactive status” from election officials after failing to participate in two federal elections.

(Read more from “State Pulls 747,000 People off of Voter Registration Rolls” HERE)

Kamala Harris’s Selective Interviews: A Cozy Chat With MSNBC Host Who Defends Her Inability to Answer Questions

Vice President Kamala Harris, who has largely avoided tough interviews during her tenure, has chosen to sit down with MSNBC host Stephanie Ruhle—who recently defended her habit of dodging direct questions. This move raises eyebrows, especially considering the context of Ruhle’s remarks just days before the interview, where she downplayed the need for Harris to address pressing policy issues.

In a recent appearance on HBO’s “Real Time With Bill Maher,” Ruhle stated, “Kamala Harris is not running for perfect. She’s running against Trump.” This comment came in response to criticism from New York Times columnist Bret Stephens, who argued that voters deserve clear answers about Harris’s positions on critical domestic and foreign policies.

The irony is palpable. As the Vice President prepares for her interview, she seems intent on rewriting her narrative, distancing herself from the failures of the Biden administration, particularly in areas where she was supposed to lead, like immigration and foreign policy. Despite being appointed as the border czar, her administration has faced widespread criticism for the border crisis, yet she continues to try to present herself as separate from the chaos.

Ruhle’s defense of Harris’s evasiveness further illustrates a troubling trend in corporate media. She asserted that voters know Trump’s track record well enough that they can forgo Harris’s policy specifics. “We have two choices,” Ruhle said, insisting that Trump’s history is clear enough for voters to make their decision without knowing Harris’s stances.

This soft-ball approach reflects a broader pattern in how Harris has navigated her campaign. For over a month since she became the Democratic nominee, she has largely shunned interviews that might press her on her historically low approval ratings and the radical views that have drawn criticism even from her own allies. When she finally agreed to an interview, it was with a sympathetic host and in a setting designed to avoid any uncomfortable questions.

Now, as she gears up for another anticipated interview with Ruhle, it seems evident that Harris is opting for a safe space where she won’t face challenging inquiries.

Americans deserve a transparent dialogue about what Harris stands for, especially as the election approaches. However, the corporate media landscape continues to shield her from real scrutiny, allowing her to sidestep difficult conversations while bolstering her image as a candidate. The question remains: will voters accept this calculated avoidance, or will they demand accountability and clarity from those seeking the highest office in the land?

Election Rigging: CNN Admits Running Fake Image to Smear Trump!

CNN issued an on-air retraction and admitted to using “digitally altered” photos of former President Donald Trump and right-wing activist and influencer Laura Loomer.

In a post on X, Loomer shared a video of CNN issuing a retraction after CNN hosts, such as Anderson Cooper, used a “digitally altered” photo of Trump and Loomer in “a number of segments” on Friday and Saturday.

“Friday evening and on Saturday, CNN aired a number of segments that briefly showed an image of former President Donald Trump and Laura Loomer taken from social media,” the CNN host said. “On review, this image had been digitally altered by a third party and should not have been included. We regret the error.

(Read more from “Election Rigging: CNN Admits Running Fake Image to Smear Trump!” HERE)

Woman Admits to Drugging Migrant Kids With Melatonin Gummies as Part of Child-Trafficking Ring: ‘We Knocked Her Out’

A Texas woman has confessed to drugging young girls with melatonin gummies while trafficking them into the US — just as border agents are warning that kids are being smuggled through similar means all across the southern border.

Vanessa Valadez, 23, of Laredo, pleaded guilty Friday to working with family members to smuggle children under the age of 5 into the country from Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, between August and September 2023.

“La noquiamos con unas gomitas,” one of Valdez’s co-conspirators wrote in a message alongside an image of a passed out girl during one operation — which translates to “we knocked her out with some gummies.”

Valdez and her family smuggled at least four young girls into the country, according to Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), picking them up from a stash house across the border and drugging them before using phony birth certificates to try to pass them off as family members.

After Laredo, the girls were taken deeper into the US and left with unknown people for unknown purposes. (Read more from “Woman Admits to Drugging Migrant Kids With Melatonin Gummies as Part of Child-Trafficking Ring: ‘We Knocked Her Out’ HERE)

Democratic Lawmaker Accused of Pretending to Be Black, Dropping N-Bombs on Twitter Account

A Democratic lawmaker in Pennsylvania has been accused of using problematic language online about minorities around a decade ago, according to several reports.

State Democratic Sen. Jimmy Dillon of Philadelphia, 45, is accused of writing unflattering tweets referencing Black, gay and Asian persons via the handle @Hoops24_7 between 2011 and 2015, The Delaware Valley (DV) Journal reported Tuesday. Dillon operates a children’s basketball academy named Hoops 24-7 Basketball Academy, hence why some are accusing him of being behind the handle @Hoops24_7.

He denied making the comments Tuesday, saying in part, “I’m not a big social media guy. If a basketball player who works with Hoops 24-7 posted something like this more than a decade ago, it’s the first I’ve heard about it, and it doesn’t reflect my values,” according to ABC27 News.

“@A2daO: This [n-word] really a 7ft two guard,” one of the tweets, posted in January 2013 via the said handle, read. “He playing like he is on tour with And1.. Unguardable.”

“@JonDaBB got 2 parties.. Need that [n-word] on board for the facility .. Big Hoops 365 staff meeting on a Friday night…,” ran another tweet dated Nov. 24, 2012. (Read more from “Democratic Lawmaker Accused of Pretending to Be Black, Dropping N-Bombs on Twitter Account” HERE)

Mom Says She Solved Daughter’s Murder Case After Police Refused to Believe Her, Ruled Death a Suicide

The mother of a daughter whose death back in July 2023 was ruled a suicide by the police says she got her son-in-law to confess that he murdered her.

Jamie Dickerson, the mother, said that even though the Metro Nashville Police Department (MNPD) at first ruled April Holt, her 29-year-old daughter, died from suicide, there was enough material in their 47-page supplement report to get her 33-year-old son-in-law to confess to killing her, Fox 17 reported.

MNPD discovered April’s corpse in the couple’s apartment with a plastic bag taped around her neck that led to death by strangulation. Dickerson pointed out that according to police’s own reporting only the fingerprints of Donovan Holt, the son-in-law, were detected on the bag and tape.

The aggrieved mother spent months investigating the case before confronting her son-in-law.

“That is when I confronted him (Donovan) and he confessed to me and so that is when I went to the police,” Dickerson said. (Read more from “Mom Says She Solved Daughter’s Murder Case After Police Refused to Believe Her, Ruled Death a Suicide” HERE)

‘Extremely Unusual’: House Judiciary Committee Unable to Locate Nathan Wade to Testify in Fani Willis Investigation

The House Judiciary Committee has so far been unable to locate Nathan Wade in order to serve him a subpoena, a spokesperson told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

The committee’s difficulty in serving a subpoena to Wade, whose testimony they are seeking as part of their probe into Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, is “extremely unusual,” spokesperson Russell Dye told the DCNF. After defendants tried to disqualify Willis from the case over her relationship with Wade, a judge ordered Wade in March to step down from his position on the election interference case against former President Donald Trump as a condition of letting Willis remain.

“The Judiciary Committee has served over 100 subpoenas this Congress,” Dye said in a statement to the DCNF. “We have done so, for the most part, without controversy or the need to use the U.S. Marshals.”

“Nathan Wade’s evasion of service is extremely unusual and will require the Committee to spend U.S. tax dollars to locate him,” Dye said.

Spending taxpayer money would be required if the committee needs to hire a private investigator or send a staffer to locate Wade.

(Read more from “‘Extremely Unusual’: House Judiciary Committee Unable to Locate Nathan Wade to Testify in Fani Willis Investigation” HERE)

Postal Union Issues Trump Letter: ‘Existential Threat’

As we approach the November election, a letter from the National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC) has raised eyebrows. The letter warns that if former President Donald Trump wins, it could pose an “existential threat” to the union and its members. Signed by Georgia NALC President Don Griggs, this communication urges members to think carefully about their voting choices, suggesting that the consequences could significantly impact their jobs and the union’s future.

The letter specifically criticizes Trump’s agenda, particularly Project 2025, despite him having no involvement, painting it as a threat to organized labor. It claims that if Trump were to take office again, he would appoint allies opposed to union interests throughout the executive branch.

Among the assertions made are proposals that could fundamentally change the labor landscape: banning public employee unions, replacing private-sector unions with company-controlled alternatives, and allowing states to bypass federal overtime and minimum wage standards. It even mentions the potential repeal of the Davis-Bacon Act, which sets wage requirements on federal projects.

However, the situation became more complicated when Griggs later clarified that he did not authorize the letter, stating it was sent out by the AFL-CIO without his permission. He expressed surprise at its contents, indicating that he would have preferred the national union to communicate directly with its members rather than through state-level channels.

The NALC’s endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris further highlights the ongoing alignment between labor organizations and Democratic candidates. This move has left many conservatives questioning the priorities of unions that traditionally stood for workers’ rights.

As the election nears, it’s vital for all voters, including union members, to consider the implications of their choices. While the NALC’s letter expresses fear over a Trump presidency, supporters of Trump see an opportunity for pro-business policies that would benefit workers and the economy at large.

P. Diddy and Jeffrey Epstein Barely Scratch the Surface of America’s Elite Rot

Last week, Sean “P. Diddy” Combs, the rapper and music producer, was arrested and charged with sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion; racketeering conspiracy; and transportation to engage in prostitution.

As many have pointed out since his homes were raided back in March, the allegations against Combs echo the disturbing pattern of Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal activities. The individuals connected to Combs and Epstein are influential figures in government, media, and entertainment. They shape our culture, and their moral corruption matters because it seeps into the very fabric of our society.

Combs allegedly orchestrated what he called “freak offs” — drug-fueled orgies where he coerced participants through threats of violence and reportedly filmed these encounters to blackmail his victims into silence. The allegations — trafficking, abuse, coercion, drugging, and non-consensual filming — are eerily similar to the Epstein case.

Moreover, like Epstein, It took years of abuse and a mountain of accusations before law enforcement finally stepped in. Combs, who is now on “suicide watch,” is being charged in the notoriously corrupt Southern District of New York, the same jurisdiction that prosecuted Epstein’s case.

Unlike Epstein, Combs is not being charged with child sexual abuse, although he has been accused of raping a minor. However, like with Epstein, Combs is the only person who has been charged so far. But other than his staff who helped facilitate the “freak offs,” it’s highly unlikely Combs is the sole prominent figure involved. (Read more from “P. Diddy and Jeffrey Epstein Barely Scratch the Surface of America’s Elite Rot” HERE)