Whoops: White House’s John Kirby Trashes Veterans on 9/11 in Email Accidentally Sent to Fox News

White House national security spokesman John Kirby trashed a group of veterans in an email sent in error to Fox News on the anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terror attacks.

As Fox News reported on Wednesday, Kirby responded to an email query from Fox about criticisms by a veterans’ group about the Biden administration’s disastrous 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan by accidentally hitting “reply all” before disparaging the veterans.

Fox reported:

“Obviously no use in responding. A ‘handful’ of vets indeed and all of one stripe,” Kirby said in a “reply all” email chain Wednesday afternoon that appeared to be intended for White House staffers, but which also included Fox News Digital.

Fox News Digital had reached out to the White House earlier Wednesday afternoon regarding critical comments from four veterans, including Rep. Cory Mills, R-Fla., who blasted Kirby for his Monday press conference that they said provided “cover” for the Biden administration’s 2021 withdrawal.

Kirby’s message was sent in error, with him following up with a Fox News Digital reporter, “Clearly, I didn’t realize you were on the chain.” Kirby sent the email while traveling with President Biden on the anniversary of 9/11.

(Read more from “Whoops: White House’s John Kirby Trashes Veterans on 9/11 in Email Accidentally Sent to Fox News” HERE)

Voters Were Asked Who They Are Voting for Post-Debate, Here’s What They Said

Although Democrats quickly declared Vice President Kamala Harris last night’s presidential debate winner, voters didn’t necessarily agree.

According to a Reuter’s focus group, which was supported by The New York Times, six in ten undecided voters suggested that former President Donald Trump won Tuesday night’s debate, citing the biased ABC News moderators who repeatedly fact-checked and argued with the 45th president.

Before the debate, the Harris campaign said the evening would allow voters to learn about the VP, her positions, and her policies. However, because of Harris’ “vague” answers, voters said they “trust” Trump more.

The outlet polled ten people, all of whom previously voted for Democrat and Republican candidates, before the debate. They said they were unsure of who they would vote for in November. However, following the 90-minute event, more than half of the respondents indicated they would now either vote for Trump or were at least leaning toward voting for him.

Five of those people said Harris left them more unsure about her positions and how she would improve the economy— a top concern for voters. Four of the respondents polled said Harris did nothing to convince them she would do anything differently from President Joe Biden, who has been blamed for the U.S.’ failing economic health. (Read more from “Voters Were Asked Who They Are Voting for Post-Debate, Here’s What They Said” HERE)

China Hawks Slam Biden-Harris Admin for Ignoring Growing Evidence Beijing Is Running Spy Ops Out of Diplomatic Posts

The Biden State Department has seemingly ignored mounting evidence of China running influence and intel operations from its diplomatic posts. And national security experts and China hardliners say Americans shouldn’t expect the administration to take action anytime soon.

Linda Sun, a former high-level official under Gov. Kathy Hochul, was arrested on Sep. 3 on allegations of acting on behalf of China’s government at the direction of the New York Chinese consulate, adding to a growing list of allegations of Chinese influence activities. The State Department has several tools to deter Beijing and Chinese consulates from such activities but has not taken any visible measures to do so, experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

“There is a range of things the State Department could be doing… The least they could do is to reiterate the warnings of the previous [Trump administration], and where they see need of it, improve upon the warnings of the previous administration,” Steve Yates, a senior fellow at the America First Policy Institute (AFPI) and former national security official, told the DCNF. “That hasn’t happened, and I don’t expect it to happen now.”

Yates pointed to an example where the Trump administration shut down a Chinese consulate in Texas in 2020 over concerns that it was a hub for espionage and influence activities. The Biden administration has not closed any of the four remaining Chinese consulates located across the U.S.

(Read more from “China Hawks Slam Biden-Harris Admin for Ignoring Growing Evidence Beijing Is Running Spy Ops Out of Diplomatic Posts” HERE)

Kamala Harris’s Debate Drama: A Hollywood Production?

During Tuesday’s presidential debate, Kamala Harris’s theatrical performance left many viewers scratching their heads and laughing in disbelief. The Democratic nominee’s over-the-top facial expressions seemed to be part of a carefully orchestrated display intended to capture the spotlight from former President Donald Trump.

According to former Democratic Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, Harris’s dramatic debate antics were no accident. In a recent Fox News interview, Gabbard revealed that Harris had been receiving acting lessons and was coached by Hollywood insiders in preparation for the debate. “She’s locked herself in a hotel room, taking extreme acting lessons,” Gabbard said. “She’s got Hollywood advisers, stages, the Hollywood lights in the hopes that her friends in ABC and propaganda media declare her the winner.”

Gabbard, who has recently endorsed Trump and is serving as an advisor to his campaign, expressed skepticism about Harris’s approach. She believes that Harris’s theatrical performance might be an attempt to manipulate voters rather than offer substantive policy proposals. “But I don’t think American people are going to fall for this,” Gabbard added.

The debate’s social media reaction to Harris’s antics was mixed. Her exaggerated facial expressions, especially when Trump was speaking, were widely ridiculed online. This spectacle has only fueled suspicions that Harris’s performance was part of a larger strategy to sway public opinion through media manipulation rather than genuine political debate.

The connection between Harris and Hollywood elites, who have fervently supported her campaign, has also drawn scrutiny. Disney executive Dana Walden, a key figure overseeing ABC News, has been a significant supporter of Harris. Walden’s donations to Harris’s political campaigns and her close personal ties to the Harris family—she is friends with Kamala Harris and her husband, entertainment lawyer Doug Emhoff—raise questions about potential conflicts of interest.

Harris once credited Dana Walden and her husband, Matt, for her successful marriage during a 2022 fundraiser, underscoring the deep connections between the Harris campaign and Hollywood’s power brokers. This cozy relationship between Harris and Hollywood insiders only adds fuel to the fire of concerns about media bias and influence.

Google’s Pro-Kamala Harris Bias Exposed: A Disturbing Look at Tech Giants’ Political Manipulations

An undercover video has exposed Google’s covert support for Vice President Kamala Harris and her leftist agenda. This insider leak not only confirms long-held suspicions but raises serious questions about the integrity of search engine advertising and the influence of tech giants on the 2024 presidential election.

Dakota Leazer, a Google growth strategist, has been caught on tape admitting that Google has been actively promoting Kamala Harris through its ads. This revelation comes courtesy of James O’Keefe and his team, known for their investigative reporting and hidden-camera exposures. According to Leazer, Google’s ad strategy has been strategically skewed to favor Harris, with ads masquerading as impartial news content to manipulate public perception. “Google was essentially promoting through its ads rhetoric that was very pro-Kamala,” Leazer confesses in the video.

This disclosure confirms what many conservatives have long suspected: tech behemoths like Google are not neutral arbiters of information but are instead engaging in political machinations to sway public opinion. Leazer’s comments reveal a disturbing trend where Google’s ads were designed to look like genuine news reports from reputable sources, such as PBS, when in reality, they were promotional materials for Harris’s campaign. This deception aimed to create a façade of unbiased reporting, thereby manipulating users into believing they were receiving fair and objective information.

Moreover, Leazer’s comments shed light on Google’s broader strategy of capitalizing on fear to drive ad revenue. According to him, Google’s primary objective is to attract and monetize users who are most fearful, a demographic Leazer claims is currently dominated by the left. “I think right now the left is more fearful than the right is,” he asserts, explaining that this fear-driven approach has led Google to push pro-Harris narratives. This strategy not only undermines the integrity of search engine advertising but also raises ethical questions about exploiting users’ anxieties for financial gain.

The implications of these revelations extend beyond just Google’s practices. Reports have surfaced indicating that Harris’s campaign has been engaging in questionable tactics, such as manipulating news headlines and descriptions to make it appear as though major news outlets like Reuters, CBS News, CNN, NPR, and the Associated Press are endorsing her. These tactics involve creating misleading ad headlines that distort the actual content of news stories, thus misrepresenting the support of established media organizations.

The fallout from these manipulative practices is already being felt. A family-run broadcasting outlet, which was targeted by Harris’s campaign, is reportedly considering legal action after their reputation was potentially damaged by the deceptive ad practices.

Trump Spars With Harris, Moderators During Heated Presidential Debate: ‘She Doesn’t Have a Plan’

Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris faced off in a heated debate Tuesday night, sparring about abortion, immigration, Israel, the economy and a range of other issues—but Trump also battled the ABC News moderators, who were quick to challenge and “fact check” the 45th president, while leaving Harris’ numerous distortions untouched.

Trump and Harris engaged in their first, and possibly only debate of the 2024 general election cycle at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia, Pa. Tuesday night—a highly-anticipated ninety-minute showdown as they traded jabs, and repeatedly, accused each other of lying.

The two met for the first time Tuesday night on the debate stage, with the vice president introducing herself as “Kamala Harris” to the former president as they shook hands–before making it a top priority to attempt to get under his skin and bait him throughout the debate.

The debate got underway with questions from ABC News’ David Muir and Linsey Davis, who challenged Trump throughout the debate.

Shortly after it concluded, Trump told Fox News Digital that he thought it was his “best debate ever, especially because it was three on one.” (Read more from “Trump Spars With Harris, Moderators During Heated Presidential Debate: ‘She Doesn’t Have a Plan’” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Illegal Alien Arrested for Alleged Child Rape in Martha’s Vineyard Had Just Been Released From Prison

An illegal immigrant who is charged with child rape on the affluent island of Martha’s Vineyard had just been released from prison for other violent crimes.

24-year-old Warley Neto of Brazil was arrested after being indicted for five counts of child rape and 5 counts of enticing a minor under 16 years old.

Neto had entered into the U.S. illegally in 2018 and was released with a notice to appear before an immigration judge, officials said.

Instead, he was arrested five years later for strangulation, assault and battery, and threat to commit a crime. He was convicted and sentenced to a year in prison on June 2023, but was released after only serving 90 days.

Months later, he was arrested for the child rape charges. Public details about the new charges are limited because of the age of the victim. (Read more from “Illegal Alien Arrested for Alleged Child Rape in Martha’s Vineyard Had Just Been Released From Prison” HERE)

If You Want Haitians Eating Cats and Decapitating Ducks in Your Town, Vote for Harris

If you were confused on Monday by the sudden proliferation of social media memes featuring AI-generated images of Donald Trump surrounded by kittens and ducks, or saving them from Haitians mobs, let me explain.

Residents of Springfield, Ohio, a town of about 60,000 people, have been complaining recently about the influx of some 20,000 Haitian immigrants over the past three years, which has transformed their community in profound and disturbing ways. Some have claimed the Haitians are stealing people’s cats and dogs and slaughtering them to eat. Others have said they’re grabbing ducks and geese from the local park and decapitating them.

Corporate media were quick to publish stories on Monday “debunking” these claims, citing local police and municipal officials who say there have been no reports of missing pets or decapitated ducks in the park, as if that makes it a “false claim” to say otherwise. Never mind that these officials have no way of knowing whether this is really happening, and that actual residents of Springfield claim that it is indeed happening, the point is to shame anyone who dares to notice the problems that arise when you inundate a community with foreigners from the Third World.

And of course it’s not just the slaughtering of animals that’s a problem in Springfield. The local community health clinic, for example, has been overwhelmed with Haitian patients in recent years, with a 13-fold increase from 2021 to 2023, from 115 to 1,500 according to the New York Times. The public school system had to hire two dozen Haitian-Creole interpreters and now spends ten times more on translation services compared to four years ago because so many school children are Haitians who don’t speak English. Because of the rapid population increase in Springfield, housing costs have skyrocketed, with many local residents priced out because of newly-arrived Haitians willing to pay more in rent. . .

Republican vice presidential candidate J.D. Vance has brought up Springfield more than once in recent months, pointing to it as an example of how the Biden-Harris administration’s immigration policies have hurt American towns and communities, overwhelming them with illegal immigrants caught crossing the border and then released into the interior of the country. (Vance, among others, was dragged by the corporate press for repeating claims about pets being slaughtered and eaten by the Haitians.) The mayor and city manager of Springfield went on Fox News a few months ago and said the same, that the Haitian migrant influx is crippling and overwhelming the city. (Read more from “If You Want Haitians Eating Cats and Decapitating Ducks in Your Town, Vote for Harris” HERE)

IRS Gets Sued for Punishing Conservative Groups While Ignoring Violations by Leftists

The Internal Revenue Service is being sued for violating the freedom of speech, free exercise and equal treatment requirements of the U.S. Constitution against two churches and a couple of conservative nonprofit organizations with tax-exempt status – while ignoring rules violations from leftist organizations.

It was, of course, during Barack Obama’s administration that the IRS was caught scheming, and acting, against conservative organizations as Obama was seeking re-election, by delaying and rejecting their applications for tax status so that they would not be able to speak about Obama’s extremist agenda during the campaign.

The result was a series of lawsuits, settlements, public admissions of misbehavior by the IRS and more scandals.

And WND reported more than a year ago that that was Lois Lerner, Part 1, when she pled the Fifth before Congress, was found in contempt and given a free pass by Obama.

That report said conservatives at that time were warning that Lois Lerner, Part 2, was coming.

It was because the IRS under Joe Biden, like the IRS under Obama, “subjected an elections nonprofit to a battery of prying questions about its policy positions, language choices and methodology for arriving at correct opinions and conclusions prior to peremptorily rejecting its application for tax-exempt status without appeal.” (Read more from “IRS Gets Sued for Punishing Conservative Groups While Ignoring Violations by Leftists” HERE)

RNC Spokeswoman: Election Matter of ‘Life or Death,’ U.S. Faces Same Threat as Israel Without ‘Strong Leadership’

The 2024 presidential election is a matter of “life or death,” argued Republican spokesperson Elizabeth Pipko, who noted that the U.S. and Israel share the same “evil” enemy while warning that “weak leadership” could lead to an October 7-like tragedy on American soil.

In a conversation with Jewish News Syndicate (JNS), published Tuesday, Pipko, a spokeswoman for the Republican National Committee (RNC), emphasized that the 2024 election is not just political but a matter of “life or death,” arguing that the current threats against the Jewish State reflect a shared danger for both Israel and the U.S. under what she describes as “weak leadership.”

“People are being slaughtered by an evil that’s not just an enemy of Israel, but it’s an enemy of ours, too,” she said.

According to JNS, Pipko, a former model and founder of a movement encouraging Jewish Democrats to switch parties, explained that Republican support for Israel symbolizes broader values, such as strength and security.

“Support for Israel against an enemy like Hamas is everything that we believe in and stand for as a country,” she said, adding that Israel’s security concerns should resonate with Americans at large. (Read more from “RNC Spokeswoman: Election Matter of ‘Life or Death,’ U.S. Faces Same Threat as Israel Without ‘Strong Leadership’” HERE)