What Joe Miller Has Been Saying for Years: Study Shows Google has Interfered in Dozens of U.S. Elections

A damning report released by the Media Research Center (MRC) alleges that Google, the tech giant synonymous with online search and advertising, has repeatedly interfered in U.S. elections, manipulating search results to favor leftist candidates and suppress conservative voices.

The study, conducted by MRC’s Free Speech America division, outlines a shocking pattern of election interference spanning over 16 years and encompassing 41 separate instances. According to Dan Schneider, vice president of MRC Free Speech America, and Gabriela Pariseau, the division’s editor, Google’s actions have had a profound impact on electoral outcomes, consistently harming candidates who posed a threat to its preferred left-wing candidates, regardless of party affiliation.

The report highlights a range of alleged infractions, including algorithmic manipulation and outright censorship. Among the most significant claims are accusations that Google favored Barack Obama over Republican rivals John McCain in 2008 and Mitt Romney in 2012. Additionally, it’s asserted that Google failed to rectify a derogatory “Google bomb” targeting Rick Santorum during the 2012 GOP primaries and selectively excluded potentially damaging autofill results for Hillary Clinton in 2016 while neglecting to extend the same courtesy to Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders.

Further findings suggest that Google disabled Tulsi Gabbard’s ad account during the 2020 Democratic debates, suppressed negative coverage of Joe Biden, concealed Republican campaign websites during the 2022 Senate races, and is actively boosting Biden’s 2024 campaign by burying search results related to his opponents.

According to the authors of the study, this pattern of misconduct is not limited to isolated incidents but reflects an organizational mission to interfere in elections. Google consistently favored candidates aligned with its leftist values while censoring those perceived as threats.

Google has vehemently denied the allegations, stating that they are baseless and inaccurate. These allegations raise significant concerns about the integrity of electoral processes and the influence of technology giants on democratic systems in the United States.

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Super Bowl Champ Turns Left-Wing Talking Point on Its Head, Points Out What Really Matters: We Need Strong Fathers

Kansas City Chiefs kicker Harrison Butker recalled the deadly shooting at the team’s Super Bowl parade in a recent interview.

Disc jockey Lisa Lopez-Galvan was killed and nearly two dozen others were wounded in last month’s shooting. Three men are facing federal gun charges in the incident.

The Super Bowl champion was asked in an interview on EWTN News’ “In Depth” about gun violence and how to curb it in the wake of the shooting.

“I had to do a lot of thinking about what took place at the parade. I know that gun violence was a big discussion, but at the end of the day this is degenerative violence, and it should not be occurring,” Butker said. “I think we need strong fathers in the home. We need men that are leading, that are setting good examples, that are teaching the young men in our society that violence is not the way to handle our disputes.

“It’s very unfortunate what happened. Unfortunately, many, many children were injured. A beautiful young lady was killed over someone getting offended and turning to violence to handle that dispute. It’s so sad. I don’t think guns are the issue. I think we need fathers in the home that are being great examples for our youth.” (Read more from “Super Bowl Champ Turns Left-Wing Talking Point on Its Head, Points Out What Really Matters: We Need Strong Fathers” HERE)

Trump: Any Jewish Person Who Votes for Democrats ‘Hates Their Religion’

Former President Donald Trump has come under fire for saying that Jewish people who vote for Democrats “hate their religion.”

In an interview on Monday with Sebastian Gorka, a former White House aide of his, Trump was asked about several prominent Democrats’ criticisms of Israel’s government, including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and President Joe Biden. Trump responded by accusing Democrats of hating Israel and questioning the faith of the Jewish people who support them.

“I actually think they hate Israel,” Trump said. “I think they hate Israel. And the Democrat party hates Israel.”

“Any Jewish person that votes for Democrats hates their religion,” he added later in the interview. “They hate everything about Israel, and they should be ashamed of themselves because Israel will be destroyed.”

He reiterated comments he made on Sunday about Schumer’s motivations, saying Democrats only criticized Israel due to cynical self-interest, seeing potential votes from pro-Palestinians. (Read more from “Trump: Any Jewish Person Who Votes for Democrats ‘Hates Their Religion’” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Biden and the Media Peddle Dishonest Trump ‘Bloodbath’ Smear

President Joe Biden and the media peddled a dishonest smear over the weekend, claiming that former President Donald Trump was inciting political violence when he said there would be a “bloodbath” in the country if he does not win in November.

The Trump comment used to advance this false narrative was made by the former president on Saturday during a campaign rally in Ohio, where he was discussing the effect of Biden’s automotive import policies and how he would place tariffs on Chinese vehicles.

“We’re going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you’re not going to be able to sell those guys if I get elected,” Trump said. “Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath for the whole — that’s gonna be the least of it. It’s going to be a bloodbath for the country. That’ll be the least of it. But they’re not going to sell those cars. They’re building massive factories.”

It is quite clear from the context of the quote that Trump is referring to the auto industry and the effect of Biden’s policies on automotive manufacturing jobs. But in an act of blatant dishonesty, the Biden campaign and legacy media outlets twisted the former president’s comments to seem like he was promising violence should he lose the election.

Biden campaign spokesman James Singer said the comment was evidence of “who Donald Trump is” and that he would ensure more political violence. (Read more from “Biden and the Media Peddle Dishonest Trump ‘Bloodbath’ Smear” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Here’s What Scientists Now Say We Should Eat to ‘Save the Planet’ From Climate Change

For more than a decade, people have been told to eat bugs to combat climate change. The hot new food source to reportedly reduce one’s carbon footprint is snakes, according to scientists.

New research advocates for humans to increase consumption of snakes as a food alternative to reduce greenhouse gases.

Research published in Scientific Reports last week noted that “python farming appears to offer tangible benefits for sustainability and food systems resilience.”

The authors of the study claim that python farming “can not only complement existing livestock systems, but may offer better returns in terms of production efficiencies.”

“This is an alternative livestock system that needs to be taken seriously,” said the paper’s lead author – Dr. Daniel Natusch. “We’re not necessarily saying everyone should stop eating beef and turn to pythons, but there needs to be a conversation about them having a more prominent place in the agricultural mix.” (Read more from “Here’s What Scientists Now Say We Should Eat to ‘Save the Planet’ From Climate Change” HERE)

Ex-Network Anchor Hints at Assassination of Trump

Keith Olbermann, formerly an MSNBC anchor known for his wild and outlandish ideas, such as his suggestion to dissolve the U.S. Supreme Court, now has gone on social media with an implied threat to President Donald Trump.

There’s always the hope https://t.co/SBlFO3kKnA

— Keith Olbermann⌚️ (@KeithOlbermann) March 16, 2024

It was a Joe Biden campaign account that commented about Trump explaining he’s been persecuted worse than any president in history, including Abraham Lincoln, and Olbermann said, “There’s always the hope.”
Fox News cited Olbermann’s reputation for “inflammatory” statements.

Fox reported, “One account that responded to Olbermann’s post suggested the commentator’s account should be ‘permanently suspended’ for appearing to endorse someone killing Trump, the presumptive nominee for the 2024 Republican nomination. Trump is trying to become only the second president since Grover Cleveland to win another White House term after losing a previous re-election bid.” (Read more from “Ex-Network Anchor Hints at Assassination of Trump” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Terror Expert: Look Who May Try to Disrupt November Election

As the number of suspected terrorists reportedly plotting assassinations and deadly attacks in America continues to grow, so does the risk of interfering with this year’s presidential election.

Historically, election cycles around the world have often faced disruption by adversaries, whether through election interference, threats of violence or actual violence. For example, the commuter train bombings in Spain on March 11, 2004, carried out by Islamic terrorists, which killed 193 people and injured over 1,800, took place just three days prior to a national election. The coordinated attack is believed by many to have influenced voters to reject a Spanish government that participated in the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

For Middle East expert and terrorism scholar Adrian Calamel, attacks like the one in Madrid have him growing increasingly fearful about similar violence being used to disrupt November’s presidential election in the U.S.

Calamel, a senior fellow at the Washington, D.C.-based Arabian Peninsula Institute, tells WND the “specter of something like this happening in America” is related to an active assassination plot against several Trump-era officials. Earlier this month, news began to circulate that an agent of Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security, or MOIS, was “wanted for questioning in connection with the recruitment of individuals for various operations in the United States, to include lethal targeting of current and former United States Government officials as revenge for the killing of IRGC-QF Commander Qasem Soleimani.”

In 2020, Soleimani was killed by a U.S. drone strike on the order of then-President Donald Trump. As a result, Iran pledged to retaliate and named multiple American targets, including former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, former national security adviser John Bolton, former U.S. special representative for Iran Brian Hook, as well as other current and former officials of the U.S. government. (Read more from “Terror Expert: Look Who May Try to Disrupt November Election” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Joe Scarborough Deletes Trump ‘Bloodbath’ Post After Reply From Elon Musk

MSNBC host Joe Scarborough deleted a social media post about Trump’s “bloodbath” remark after receiving a reply from Elon Musk.

Former President Donald Trump said at a Saturday rally in Ohio that there would be a “bloodbath” for the country while railing against jobs in the auto industry being offshored to other countries under the Biden administration. Musk responded to Scarborough, who then deleted his own post, after the “Morning Joe” host posted footage from the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riot on X.

“Donald Trump’s America. And he’s proud of it,” Scarborough wrote in the now-deleted post. “Promised another ‘bloodbath’ if he loses again.”

“Jan 6 was not a ‘bloodbath’ by any definition and Trump was referring to job losses in the auto industry when he used that word. Your post is extremely misleading,” Musk replied.

Trump’s “bloodbath” comment was made as the 2024 Republican presidential nominee riffed about how countries like Mexico and China are financially benefitting from President Joe Biden’s electric vehicle (EV) policies. (Read more from “Joe Scarborough Deletes Trump ‘Bloodbath’ Post After Reply From Elon Musk” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Need More Proof Biden Was Drugged for the State of the Union? Here It Is.

A great deal hinged on Joe Biden’s performance during Thursday evening’s State of the Union address. The White House knew more than anything that Biden had to dispel concerns regarding his age and cognitive decline. Naturally, the mainstream media did its part to help shore up this narrative affirming Biden’s presidential competence. They wound up choosing the same entry from the thesaurus to characterize his delivery: “fiery.”

Dr. Carole Lieberman, a forensic psychiatrist specializing in elderly dementia patients, pointed out that Biden’s increased speed and volume during the address, contrary to his usual slow and stumbling demeanor, could be indicative of stimulant usage, potentially Adderall or another amphetamine. . .

As compelling and convincing as Lieberman’s theory is, there’s actually more evidence Biden was not his usual self during the State of the Union.

I previously pointed to Biden’s brief encounter with reporters on the tarmac at Joint Base Andrews, where he had curiously become his trademark low-energy, glitchy self. His explanation for his use of the word “illegals” to describe an illegal immigrant—which irked many in his party—was, to say the least, unimpressive.

But even more indicative that something had changed in Biden was his campaign speech in Philadelphia, Penn., on Friday, which was virtually a carbon copy of his State of the Union speech, yet it was a disaster.

(Read more from “Need More Proof Biden Was Drugged for the State of the Union? Here It Is.” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

J.K. Rowling Delivers Hilarious Translation of Woke Trans ‘Ally’s’ X Post

“Harry Potter” author J.K. Rowling delivered a scathing translation of an X post written by a man who claimed to be an LGBTQ “ally” and warned her to delete posts referring to a trans-identifying male as a man.

Rowling exchanged a few posts with an attorney named Rajan Barot, responding first when he advised her to delete posts about a trans-identifying activist who goes by the name India Willoughby in order to avoid running afoul of a new law.

“It comes into force on 1 April 2024 and any posts up after that are amenable to prosecution in Scotland. You are best advised to delete the posts about @IndiaWilloughby as they most likely contravene the new law. Start deleting!” Barot posted.

“If you genuinely imagine I’d delete posts calling a man a man, so as not to be prosecuted under this ludicrous law, stand by for the mother of all April Fools’ jokes,” Rowling replied.

(Read more from “J.K. Rowling Delivers Hilarious Translation of Woke Trans ‘Ally’s’ X Post” HERE)