How Reagan Won By Telling the Best Story (+video)

Ronald Reagan, the 40th President of the United States, was born 104 years ago today. The same battles he fought and often won against Big Government are at issue once again. The Gipper always knew the best way to win these struggles in the court of public opinion was by telling the best story.

A look back at some of his most prominent addresses reveals that they were often structured as one big story. It should come as no surprise that our nation’s first and only Hollywood actor turned governor, turned President would know how to tell a compelling story.

Certainly the most memorable public speakers of all time knew telling a good story is the best way to hold your audience’s attention and convince them what you are saying is true. Martin Luther King, Jr., John Kennedy, Winston Churchill, Franklin Roosevelt, Abraham Lincoln going all the way back to the most impactful communicator of them all, Jesus of Nazareth, used stories to connect powerfully and emotionally with their audiences.

The story Ronald Reagan, “the Great Communicator,” most often told as a political figure, particularly in the years leading up to his election as President, went something like this. The United States, a great nation, faces an uncertain, perilous future due to threats both at home and abroad. At home our heroes–the American people—are up against a gargantuan, menacing foe–the federal government (and those who support its further growth)—hell bent on stealing the people’s liberty and the American dream. A restoration of the nation’s status as a “City on a Hill” is possible, if liberty-loving people courageously rise up, slay the Big Government beast, and return to the constitutional government that our Founders intended.

Reagan’s first major political speech, “A Time For Choosing,” in support of Barry Goldwater for President in 1964, employed this structure. It was “The Speech” that put him on the political map. Early in his remarks, Reagan said, “This is the issue of this election: Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capitol can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves.”

In “A Time for Choosing,” Reagan predicted if the United States followed the liberal ideology and policies being implemented by President Johnson and the Democrats (the Great Society foremost among them), it would lead to American decline. He was right. By the late 70s, the full weight of these programs and the liberals’ profligate taxing, spending and borrowing had come home to roost. Even Democrat President Jimmy Carter admitted a malaise had settled over the country as Americans’ faith in the future waned. The nation experienced stagflation: double-digit inflation coupled with slow economic growth, something economists did not think was possible.

Enter Ronald Reagan, stage right. He offered an alternative vision. In announcing his candidacy in late 1979, he followed his tried and true story structure: America is in peril; the federal government is largely to blame; a restoration is possible. He said, “They [those who support the Big Government status quo] tell us we must learn to live with less, and teach our children that their lives will be less full and prosperous than ours have been; that the America of the coming years will be a place where – because of our past excesses – it will be impossible to dream and make those dreams come true. I don’t believe that. And, I don’t believe you do either. That is why I am seeking the presidency. I cannot and will not stand by and see this great country destroy itself…The people have not created this disaster in our economy; the federal government has. It has overspent, overestimated, and over regulated.”

Later in the address, Reagan said, “[The American people] want someone who believes they can ‘begin the world over again.’ A leader who will unleash their great strength and remove the roadblocks government has put in their way. I want to do that more than anything I’ve ever wanted. And it’s something that I believe with God’s help I can do.”

Reagan followed this same story structure in his speech accepting the Republican nomination and in his First Inaugural Address, during which he memorably pronounced, “In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem.”

What was the result of all of Reagan’s story telling? The American people listened and believed him. Reagan won his 1980 election against Carter 44 states to 6, and won his re-election 49 states to 1. They also believed what he said about how to get the country moving again. During the 1980s, the United States experienced a decade of unprecedented economic growth, a restoration of the American spirit, and a return to the position of the unrivaled leader of the free world.

In his Farewell Address, Reagan ended the story of his Presidency with a deep sense of satisfaction saying, “My friends: We did it. We weren’t just marking time. We made a difference. We made the city stronger, we made the city freer, and we left her in good hands. All in all, not bad, not bad at all.” Is it possible to win the public debate and end the era of big government once again? I know the Gipper would say (with a twinkle in his eye), “Sure it is. Just tell them the right story.”

When Will Obama Finally Get Angry at Radical Islam?

By Liz Peek. America wants to know, when is President Obama going to get angry? When is he going to slam his fist on the desk, demand vengeance, put aside his incessant campaigning and call out the Islamic radicals of ISIS as the animals they are?

Interrupted in the course of yet another photo-op on the benefits of ObamaCare, the president looked almost irritated Tuesday to be asked his reaction to the murder of the Jordanian pilot, shown on an Internet video being burned alive by ISIS.

He talked calmly about the “bankrupt ideology” of this “organization,” like he was addressing unhealthy menu choices at a fast food company. Where’s his outrage? (Read more about Obama’s reaction to radical Islam HERE)

____________________________________________________

Christian Militia Formed to Fight ISIS in Northern Iraq

By Jack Moore. Thousands of Iraqi Christians have established their own militia and are training to fight the Islamic State (ISIS) in the Nineveh Plains of northern Iraq.

The Nineveh Plains Protection Units (NPU) has 3,000 Assyrian Christian men registered to be trained, while another 500 are already training for combat. The militia was founded by the Iraqi political party, the Assyrian Democratic Movement.

Another 500 volunteers from the group are already situated in Assyrian villages in northern Iraq, the majority of which were captured by ISIS when they marched across the country last summer. Approximately 30,000 Christians have since fled the Nineveh Plains for fear of falling into the hands of the radical Islamists. (Read more from this story HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

AllenBWest.com: Was Chris Kyle’s Killer a Muslim?

Photo Credit: AllenbWest The “conventional wisdom” says former Navy SEAL Chris Kyle was tragically shot and killed by a former soldier suffering from PTSD.

But perhaps there’s another version of the story no one wants to talk about. What if Routh had been converted to militant Islam in Iraq and sought Kyle out as retribution? . . .

According to The Warfighter Foundation, it is highly unlikely Routh suffered from PTSD because he never served in battle . . .

While Routh never served in battle, he did work as a prison guard overseeing Muslim terrorists at Bilad Airbase. Walid Shoebat posits that Routh could have interacted with the inmates and perhaps converted to Islam.

While there is no proof of any conversion, Shoebat says “During a phone call with his father, Routh expressed sympathy for the detainees and discontent over how the US was conducting the war as well as his reluctance to engage in combat” and “While working as a guard at Balad Air Base, Routh laments his [Muslim] prisoners’ poor living conditions.” (Read more from “Chris Kyle’s Killer a Muslim?” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Limbaugh: Scott Walker the Blueprint for GOP Survival

Two days have passed and the praise for Scott Walker’s Saturday speech in Iowa continue to pour in.

On his Monday program, conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh continued his praise of the Wisconsin governor, saying Walker is “the blueprint” for the Republican Party if they are “serious about beating the left.”

Limbaugh, a longtime admirer of Walker, also lashed out at the media for pushing the narrative that the potential 2016 candidate is “dull” and “colorless,” while adding that the GOP needs to “hoist” Walker on a chair “they used to take Caesar through the crowds with.”

“If you have spent any time listening to this program in the last two years, you know that I believe Scott Walker is the blueprint for the Republican Party if they are serious about beating the left Scott Walker has shown how to do it,” Limbaugh said.

“Scott Walker has the blueprint for winning and winning consistently and winning big in a blue state with conservative principles that are offered with absolutely no excuses,” Limbaugh remarked. “The left, the Democrat Party, threw everything at Scott Walker trying to destroy him. They did everything they could. He not only withstood it all, he survived and triumphed over all of it.” (Read more about Scott Walker being the only chance for GOP survival HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

GOP RIP: The Formerly Pro-Life Party

Last October, Reince Priebus gave a speech with a conspicuous omission. Just 33 days before the midterm elections, the Republican National Committee Chairman headed to George Washington University to give a speech on the issues that bring Republicans together. Priebus ticked off a lengthy list of policy proposals that all the party’s candidates could highlight, noting that they could work for anyone, “whether you’re running for governor in New England or Congress in the South or statehouse in the West.”

The speech was highly detailed. The chairman praised specific pieces of legislation and touted the construction of the Keystone Pipeline and the passage of a Balanced Budget Amendment as issues that could unite GOP politicians. On these points and many others, Priebus was clear as glass. But on one enormous issue, the chairman was oddly opaque.

“As Republicans we’re pro-family; and we’re also pro-life,” he said, according to the transcript of his prepared remarks. “So when a woman faces an unplanned pregnancy, society should offer our support and compassion. She should know that adoption is possible. Our laws should be improved to make adoption an easier path for families who want to open their homes to children.”

And that was it. The GOP is pro-life, the chairman said, so the GOP supports making adoption easier. Priebus didn’t add anything beyond that. He couldn’t have, given the reference to the party’s New England gubernatorial candidates, almost all of whom are pro-choice. As the last 24 hours have shown, anti-abortion votes are a dicey prospect for some Hill Republicans. And the Keystone Pipeline just might have broader support among Washington Republicans than the pro-life movement. (Read more about the formerly pro-life party HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Watch Gov. Bobby Jindal’s Shocking Statement About Muslims

By David Brody. Hey John McCain: Move over. You have a “straight talk” partner. His name is Gov. Bobby Jindal. Watch below.

This is what he said today in London, England, about Islamic terrorists who think they’re going to heaven.

Gov. Bobby Jindal: Muslim leaders must make clear that these individuals are not going to enjoy the afterlife, they’re not going to be martyrs but rather they’re going to hell.

There’s not enough left to be said other than, “Preach it, brother!” (Read more about Bobby Jindal’s statement about Muslims HERE)

___________________________________________________

Muslim Population Growing in America

By Carol Brown. Even when Muslims are a minority population they can and do transform whole cultures and societies. And not for the better.

Why? Because their holy book is a totalitarian ideology founded on submission and world domination. And toward that end, Islam is on the march. Meanwhile, the West remains mired in cowardice and complicity. Nowhere can this be seen more clearly than in Europe, which is on the fast track to join the Caliphate.

Not to be outdone by Europe’s madness, the United States is traveling down the same bloody path, importing large numbers of Muslims from Islamic countries thanks to the Islamophile sitting in the Oval Office and a nation full of dhimmis.

Estimates on the number of Muslims living in the US vary, ranging from 3 million to 7 million. Whatever the precise number, it’s already outdated as it rises with each passing nanosecond. (Read more from this story HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Glenn Beck: This Is Where Obama Snapped at State of the Union

Photo Credit: National Review Glenn Beck and his radio co-hosts, Pat Gray and Stu Burguiere, responded to the State of the Union in real time on Tuesday, saying the only way they could tolerate watching the entire speech was by “addressing all the lies” as President Barack Obama spoke them.

There were a few parts of the speech that stuck out to Beck, and he discussed them on his radio program Wednesday. One of the most memorable moments, Beck said, was when the president “just snapped and got all dark and ugly,” just after encouraging the nation to come together.

The president said: “That’s a better politics. That’s how we start rebuilding trust. That’s how we move this country forward. That’s what the American people want. That’s what they deserve. I have no more campaigns to run–”

Then, as people began to applaud, the president went off his prepared remarks and added: “I know, because I won both of them.”

“Right in the middle of him saying, ‘You know what, I just love everybody and we all have to work together,’ he takes a shift,” Beck said. “[And] all he’s doing is just raising money for the campaign. That’s all this guy has done!” (Read more on how Obama snapped HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Rand Paul on Amnesty: ‘The 11 Million are Never Going Home’

Photo Credit: Fox NewsIn New Hampshire yesterday, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul told a group of supportive Republican legislators that the country needed some immigration fixes. A few hours later, I asked whether, if elected president, Paul would move to overturn the Obama-era executive orders that have essentially legalized millions of immigrants.

“I’ve always been of the opinion that we should do things the proper way,” Paul said. “I am in favor of doing immigration reform, but it should be done in the proper fashion.” He cited the the need to tighten border security before attempting anything else, but added that “the 11 million, I think, are never going home, don’t need to be sent home, and I would incorporate them into our society by giving them work visas and making them taxpayers.”

Meanwhile, back in Washington, the House GOP was voting to defund Obama’s immigration orders. Paul didn’t necessarily disagree with the House objection—at one point, he quoted Montesquieu’s “Spirit of the Laws” to explain why the executive orders couldn’t be sustained. But on policy, he was set apart from more than 200 Republicans ready to undo an order that granted legal status to minors brought into the country by their parents. In the summer of last year, in fact, Paul supported exactly that. And now, as a potential presidential candidate, he wasn’t leading with it. (Read more about Rand Paul on amnesty HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Republicans Must Continue to Break the Status Quo

If the past is prologue, the future of the new Republican majority may be short-lived. The GOP’s rapid return to minority status need not be, but it must learn the lessons of its past.

The numbers speak for themselves. Over the last century, the Democrats have controlled both houses of Congress 56 years to the Republicans 26. Overall, the Democrats have held at least one chamber of Congress for 74 of the past 100 years.

Looking back over the history of the Republican Party, the shining moments (and longest times in leadership) have come when it boldly took up the banner of reform rather than holding up the white flag of resignation to the status quo. During these times, the GOP faced and addressed the nation’s challenges so directly and correctly that the American people rewarded it with the opportunity to lead for years, and even decades, at a time.

Formed in 1850s, the Republican Party took on the issue of slavery, when the other two parties of the day—Democrats and Whigs—would not. The GOP succeeded not only in its initial goal of blocking the growth of slavery, but went on to preside over its ultimate demise within a little over a decade of the Party’s genesis. The majority of Americans responded to this leadership by granting Republicans control of Congress (and the Presidency with two exceptions) for the rest of the 1800s and into the early 1900s.

After losing its way briefly during the 1910s, the Republican Party grabbed on to the reform banner once again and regained control of Congress in 1919. The GOP proceeded to pass the 19th Amendment, guaranteeing women the right to vote, and implemented policies to get the post World War I recession bound economy moving again. They cut taxes to a top rate of 25 percent and slashed the war-fattened federal budget in half. The economy roared back creating one of the greatest periods of expansion in American history with unemployment dropping from nearly 12 percent to essentially full employment. The federal government ran surpluses throughout the 1920s, and the Republicans stayed at the helm of leadership for its longest run in the past 100 years.

By the end of the decade, poor lending policies and rampant over-speculation in the stock market precipitated the crash of 1929 and subsequent Great Depression. The GOP response, unlike a decade before, was to raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans (from 25 to 63 percent) and grow the size of the federal budget by over 40 percent.

The Democrats retook control of Congress and the Presidency in the elections of 1931 and ’33. They can always do big government better: i.e. promise, tax and spend more. FDR and the new Congress launched the New Deal with predictable results. Over a six-year period, the National Debt doubled while unemployment remained at a stubborn 17 percent.

The Republicans offered very little by way of an alternative vision for nearly 50 years. Then came Ronald Reagan. With unemployment, inflation and interest rates all in double-digits and the economy stagnant in the early 80s, he turned the orthodoxy of decades on its head pronouncing, “In this present crisis, government is not the solution to the problem, government is the problem.” His prescription: 1) Cut taxes back to nearly 1920s levels, 2) Get rid of burdensome regulations, 3) Limit the growth of federal spending.

Reagan’s long coattails carried the GOP to control of the Senate for the first time since the 1950s and brought enough new members into the House that the Reagan Revolution could go forward. The economy soared to unprecedented heights growing an entire third larger, while creating 17 million new jobs, doubling tax revenue to the Treasury, and dropping the unemployment rate to five percent.

What the Reagan Revolution began in the 1980s, the Republican Revolution carried forward in the 90s. Keeping promises made in theContract with America, the GOP passed tax cuts for working families and those who invested in the economy, welfare reform (establishing a work requirement) and limited the growth of federal spending to its lowest levels since World War II. The economy soared to even greater heights, with unemployment dropping to under 4 percent, while the federal government ran consecutive surpluses for the first time since the 1950s. The American people rewarded the GOP with control of Congress from the latter half of 90s and into the early 2000’s.

By the 2000s, the Republican Party had gone Washington. It is true the GOP enacted pro-growth tax cuts (and revenues rose to record levels), but it also increased spending more than any Congress since the 1970s. Only half of the nearly 100 percent increase in discretionary spending related to defense/security. Overall federal spending went from approximately $2 trillion in 2001 to $3 trillion per year by 2009.

Once again if the name of the game is big government, the Democrats can always do it better and took back control of Congress and the Presidency in the elections of ’06 and ’08 and gave us $1 trillion+ deficits and ObamaCare.

A majority of the American electorate have now rejected big government and given the GOP control of the Senate and the largest majority in the House since the 1920s. All eyes are now on the Republican Party. The challenges our nation faces require a bold, reform agenda: 1) Deficits still hover at a half a trillion dollars; 2) Federal entitlements in their current configuration will bankrupt the nation; 3) ObamaCare is causing inestimable harm to the nation’s healthcare system; 4) A complex tax regime pegs the United States at the highest corporate taxes in the world; and 5) Real unemployment is still in double-digits.

Will the Republican Party take up the banner of reformation and boldly face the issues of the day or wave the white flag of resignation to the status quo? The answer to this question offers the best glimpse into how long the American people will give it the privilege to lead.

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Mitt Romney: Still Wrong on Russia

In 2012, Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney possessed no real foreign-policy experience. But that didn’t stop him from attacking President Barack Obama as weak on national security. With Osama bin Laden dead and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan poised to wind down, Romney looked elsewhere for a place where Obama was failing: Russia.

It all started in March 2012, when a hot mic caught Obama telling then Russian President Dmitry Medvedev that he would have more “space” to negotiate on missile defense after the November presidential election in the United States. After news broke of this hush-hush assurance, Romney pounced, branding Russia “without question our number one geopolitical foe” in an interview and accusing Moscow of “fight[ing] every cause for the world’s worst actors.” When pressed, he claimed that Russia posed a greater threat than Iran, China, or North Korea. In an essay published on Foreign Policy‘s website the next day, Romney went so far as to say the president was “ingratiat[ing] himself with the Kremlin.” Few in the national security community took his accusations seriously. “The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back,” Obama joked during a debate several months later.

As he gears up for yet another presidential run, it’s clear to Romney that his 2012 position has been vindicated. Last March, he authored an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal in which he argued that Obama has been a “failure” on Russia. That has become a rallying cry echoed by top foreign-policy voices in the GOP, including Sen. Kelly Ayotte and Sen. John McCain. Romney now says that Obama demonstrated “naiveté with regards to Russia” and that the president’s “faulty judgment” contributed to President Vladimir Putin’s willingness to use military force in Crimea.

Romney, though, wasn’t right then, and he isn’t right now. The Crimea invasion, as Obama has said, was the act of a cowed “regional power” — and a declining one at that. The days when Moscow could challenge the United States on a global scale are long gone. Russia is boxed in by sanctions and wracked by a collapsing economy, thanks in part to plummeting oil prices. Romney’s attempt to claim victory on all things Russia is misplaced, and it will certainly undermine his foreign-policy credibility if he chooses to run once again. (Read more about Romney being wrong on Russia HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.