Obama ready to act without Congressional consent

President Barack Obama is ready to take “small, medium and large” actions without the consent of Congress, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said.

Carney on Tuesday explained further Obama’s “We Can’t Wait” strategy of addressing problems without Congress. This would be done through executive orders and other actions Carney said.

“We hope to work with Congress to continue to take action on that to continue to grow the economy and create jobs,” Carney said. “Separate from that, and this was the case last year and will be the case this year, we can’t wait for Congress to act. And when Congress refuses to act, and Republicans choose the path of obstruction rather than cooperation, than the president is not going to sit here, this gridlock in Washington is not as excuse for inaction.”

Carney said the president wants to work with Congress, but if the House and Senate don’t, Obama will.

“He’s going to take the actions that he can take using his executive authority to help the cause here, to help Americans deal with this challenging economy. And they can be small, medium or large actions and they don’t have to be just executive authority actions,” Carney continued. “They can be things we can do working with the private sector. So he’ll pursue all tracks.”

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Read more at CNSNews.com HERE.

Iran situation illustrates need for energy independence

The United States may reject oil from Iran but that does not result in immunity from Iran’s saber-rattling in the Persian Gulf.  The situation shaping up in the Strait of Hormuz illustrates the need for a serious push towards energy independence here in the United States.  It defies common sense for the American economy to be reliant on foreign sources of energy when we have so much available right here at home.

Simply put, it comes down to supply and demand.  When any nation, such as Iran in this case, decides to restrict the supply of energy available on the world market, the price of that energy will spike for consumers, and especially American consumers.

Our nation has the ability to greatly increase the energy supplies available here at home, so why do we continue to allow petro-dictators, oppressive regimes and declared enemies of the United States to distort the market at the cost of the American People?

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Gallup: Republican Presidential Race Is Most Volatile Ever

Gallup pollsters marvel that the Republican presidential contest is the most volatile for the GOP since polling began, with four front-runners emerging and changing positions seven times since May in Gallup polling.

The phenomenal jockeying rivals only the Democrats in 2003, when six front-runners slipped into, and fell out of, the lead nine times, Gallup notes in a new report released today.

In the 2012 GOP horse race, Mitt Romney, Rick Perry, Herman Cain, and Newt Gingrich occupied the top spot at various times last year, “with Romney’s standing rising and falling as other candidates surged and faded,” Gallup’s analysis says.

Here’s the way the GOP lead has stacked up at various times, based on Gallup polls and Gallup Daily tracking last year:

May-June — Romney

July — Romney and Perry

August — Perry

October-early November — Romney and Cain, tied

Mid-November — Romney and Gingrich, tied

Early- to mid-December — Gingrich

Late December — Gingrich and Romney, tied

Toss two more names into the mix, and the race has been even more fluid, Gallup observes: “Mike Huckabee led the Republican field, or tied Romney and Sarah Palin for the lead, in Gallup polls at the start of the year; however Huckabee and Palin ultimately declined to run.”

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Read more at Newsmax.com HERE.

Joe Miller has no Plans to Run in 2012 but is Busier than Ever Fighting for Freedom

Fairbanks, Alaska. December 31, 2011 – Yesterday, Joe Miller tweeted a link to an article entitled, “Judicial Watch’s Top 10 Corrupt
Politicians: Alaska’s Don Young worse than Charles Rangel, Barney Frank & John Edwards.”  In response, a number of press inquiries were made about whether Mr. Miller has decided to run for the House seat for “all Alaska” in 2012.

Mr. Miller’s position on Alaska’s 2012 congressional race remains unchanged:  although he is disappointed in the Congressman’s record absenteeism over the last year and is concerned about continuing allegations of Mr. Young’s corrupt activity, Mr. Miller currently has no plans to run for Mr. Young’s seat.  Nevertheless, Mr. Miller is keeping all of his options open regarding elective office.

Mr. Miller is continuing his speaking engagements with political groups throughout the country.  He was recently the featured speaker at an iCaucus (Independent Caucus) event in San Diego this month and is scheduled to speak at the Yale Political Union in January.  Additionally, Mr. Miller is staying active in educational efforts, spreading the message of constitutional conservatism through his state PAC, Restoring Liberty Alaska, as well as through commentary and interviews with publications such as the Harvard Political Review (December 2011).

As of July of this year, Mr. Miller ended his Chairmanship of the Western Representation PAC to focus his efforts on expanding the Restoring Liberty Action Committee, a not-for-profit group organized to advance constitutional conservatism at a national level.  As chairman, he continues to be active with RLAC, hosting weekly conferences that have featured a number of political activists including Sharron Angle (former Republican nominee for US Senate from Nevada), Dwight Kehoe (TPATH, Conservative Alliance), Richard Faulkner (Blue Ridge Forum), Peter Howe (former Field Director, Americans for Prosperity), Stephanie Jahn (iCaucus), Jere Beery (Operation Firing for Effect), and others.  Mr. Miller looks forward to continuing his work with the political activists across the country to Restore Liberty.

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

[Please contact spokesman Bill Peck ([email protected]) with any questions about this Press Release]

Judicial Watch’s Top 10 Corrupt Politicians: Alaska’s Don Young worse than Charles Rangel, Barney Frank & John Edwards

Don Young may have achieved a new level of corruption in 2011. The House Ethics Committee announced just before Christmas that the Alaska Republican Congressman was cleared of allegations by the House Ethics Committee that he exceeded the limit on campaign donations to his legal defense fund – which was set up to defend Young against an entirely different set of corruption charges! There was good reason the House Ethics Committee released this decision after most of official Washington left for the Christmas holiday: because the Committee’s “exoneration” is a joke.

House ethics rules prohibit contributions from any single source that exceed $5,000. Young received $63,000 from “twelve companies that…were in fact owned by Gary Chouest, his wife, and his five children, or some combination of those seven individuals.” Despite an independent analysis by the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) that the shell-game was a rather transparent violation of the contribution limit, the House Ethics Committee gave Young a free pass because the 12 companies controlled by essentially one individual were “separate legal entities”!

On July 24, 2007, the Wall Street Journal reported that Young was under federal investigation for taking bribes, illegal gratuities, and unreported gifts from VECO Corporation, an Anchorage, Alaska- based company. Two executives in the company, including former company CEO Bill Allen, had already pled guilty to bribing members of the Alaska legislature. Reportedly, Young received $157,000 from VECO.

Rep. Young has developed a legendary reputation for steering federal dollars to Alaska. As The New Republic put it, Rep. Young is “well known for his sharp elbows and generous appetite for legislative pork,” including the $223 million he secured to build the so-called “Bridge to Nowhere.” Eventually, lawmakers responded to the mounting criticism and the bridge was defunded.

Over the years, Rep. Young has been linked to lobbyist Jack Abramoff’s illegal efforts to lease government property, and he has been criticized for adding a $10 million earmark to a transportation bill for a short piece of road in Florida near Fort Myers, called Coconut Road. The local real estate developer who owned 4,000 acres along the road helped raise $40,000 for Young’s campaign, which might go a long way toward explaining why the Alaska congressman aggressively pushed to build a road in Florida.

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Read more at Judicial Watch HERE.

The New Aristocrats: Congress Net Worth Skyrockets as National Net Worth Plummets

When Representative Ed Pastor was first elected to Congress two decades ago, he was comfortably ensconced in the middle class. Mr. Pastor, a Democrat from Arizona, held $100,000 or so in savings accounts in the mid-1990s and had a retirement pension, but like many Americans, he also owed the banks nearly as much in loans.

Today, Mr. Pastor, a miner’s son and a former high school teacher, is a member of a not-so-exclusive club: Capitol Hill millionaires. That group has grown in recent years to include nearly half of all members of Congress — 250 in all — and the wealth gap between lawmakers and their constituents appears to be growing quickly, even as Congress debates unemployment benefits, possible cuts in food stamps and a “millionaire’s tax.”

Mr. Pastor buys a Powerball lottery ticket every weekend and says he does not consider himself rich. Indeed, within the halls of Congress, where the median net worth is $913,000 and climbing, he is not. He is a rank-and-file millionaire. But compared with the country at large, where the median net worth is $100,000 and has dropped significantly since 2004, he and most of his fellow lawmakers are true aristocrats.

Largely insulated from the country’s economic downturn since 2008, members of Congress — many of them among the “1 percenters” denounced by Occupy Wall Street protesters — have gotten much richer even as most of the country has become much poorer in the last six years, according to an analysis by The New York Times based on data from the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonprofit research group.

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Read more at the New York Times HERE.

Ruling Class idiocy: in January, debt will exceed entire US economic output

Sometime early next month, the United States’ national debt will exceed $15.18 trillion. According to the Commerce Department, the nation’s gross domestic product (the market value of all goods and services produced) is only $15.17 trillion. In other words, not soon after the ball drops in Times Square, the U.S. will join Greece and Italy in the ranks of countries whose total debt obligations are larger than their entire economies.

The main driver of the nation’s burgeoning debt problem is out-of-control federal spending. But while Italy and Greece have cut government outlays, federal officials in the White House and Congress have been doing the opposite. According to the Congressional Budget Office, federal spending rose from $3.45 trillion in 2010 to an estimated $3.59 trillion in 2011. So much for the age of austerity.

And just where is all the federal money going? According to the “Wastebook 2011” report by Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., tax dollars were frittered away on, among many other things, video games, Christmas trees, snow cone machines, chocolate, and robot dragons. Robot dragons? Yes, the National Science Foundation recently approved a $923,000 grant for researchers to study how dragon-shaped robots can help preschoolers learn language skills.

The Coburn report also documents how our federal government blew $10 million on a remake of “Sesame Street” for Pakistani children, $15.3 million on one of the infamous bridges to nowhere in Alaska, and $765,828 to subsidize “pancakes for yuppies” in the nation’s capital. In total, Coburn identified $6.9 billion worth of what can only be charitably described as government waste.

Would a $6.9 billion cut in government spending solve our debt problem? No. But the Oklahoma senator released another report the previous month titled “Subsidies of the Rich and Famous.” That report found that the approximately 3 million U.S. households reporting more than $1 million in income receive in excess of $30 billion in welfare payments and special tax breaks every year. That’s $10,000 each, but why should such households get tax breaks like $7,500 to buy a government-approved electric hybrid car?

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Read more at the Washington Examiner HERE.

Obama: Trojan Horse President


I was thinking about writing a novel about what might happen if a man who hates America and wants to bring it down is somehow elected president. What would he do?

I sketched out a few plot elements, and you can decide whether this will fly.

First, the Trojan Horse president would initiate unprecedented spending, driving the debt up by more than $4 trillion just in the first three years. Much of the money would go into the pockets of political supporters and people who donate heavily to his campaigns.

He would ram through an unreadable law allowing the federal government to seize the health care system, which would transform citizens into beholden subjects.

He would cut out private lenders and federalize student loans.

He would go on a world apology tour, letting America’s friends and foes know that he is doing whatever he can to make sure America becomes a third-rate power and is brought to heel under a growing world government headed by the United Nations. While on the tour, he would praise Islam and denigrate America’s Christian heritage.

He would cripple America’s ability to be energy-independent by halting new drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and off the coast of Alaska – even projects that already had undergone years of research and approval. While promoting oil drilling by Brazil and other foreign countries, he would halt a pipeline from Canada’s oil tar sands that could create 20,000 U.S. jobs and reduce dependence on Middle Eastern oil.

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Read more at the Washington Times HERE.

General Patton’s Christmas Prayer

General George Patton’s Third Army led the Allied break-out of Normandy in late July 1944. By the end of September, it stood poised to enter Germany after liberating much of France during the drive across Europe. However, what the Nazi Army could not do at that point, the weather did. Europe’s unusually wet fall bogged down Patton and the rest of the Allied forces for the next two months, as they waited for the roads to dry.

The situation became so frustrating for Patton that on another rainy day in early December, he asked his Army chaplain, James O’Neill, for a weather prayer. By O’Neill’s account, the general said the weather would need to change if they were going to win the war. The chaplain composed this prayer:

“Almighty and most merciful Father, we humbly beseech Thee, of Thy great goodness, to restrain these immoderate rains with which we have to contend. Grant us fair weather for battle. Graciously harken to us as soldiers who call upon Thee that armed with Thy power, we may advance from victory to victory, and crush the oppression and wickedness of our enemies, and establish Thy justice among men and nations. Amen.”

Patton liked it and ordered O’Neill to print 250,000 copies on prayer cards to distribute to the entire Third Army. On the reverse side of the cards was a Christmas greeting from the General. Patton then questioned the chaplain as to how much praying the Army was doing. O’Neill believed not much: when there’s fighting, everybody prays; but when it’s quiet, everyone just sits around and waits for things to happen. The General responded, “Chaplain, I am a strong believer in prayer. There are three ways that men get what they want; by planning, by working, and by praying. Any great military operation takes careful planning, or thinking. Then you must have well-trained troops to carry it out; that’s working. But between the plan and the operation there is always the unknown. That unknown spells defeat or victory, success or failure. It is the reaction of the actors to the ordeal when it actually comes. Some people call it getting the breaks; I call it God. God has His part, or margin in everything. That’s where prayer comes in.”  Patton added, “A good soldier is not made merely by making him think and work. There is something in every soldier that goes deeper than thinking or working—it’s his ‘guts.’ It is something that he has built in there: it is a world of truth and power that is higher than himself.”

Patton referred to the account of Gideon in the Bible who, despite being greatly outnumbered, fought bravely and prevailed because the Lord was with him. (See Judges, Chapters 6-8). The General observed that his men should be praying, wherever they were—or eventually they would “crack up.” Patton instructed O’Neill to put out a training letter for all the chaplains in the Third Army on the importance of prayer. It was circulated to the Third Army’s 486 chaplains and to every organizational commander down to the regimental level—3,200 letters. Recounting how God aided an army in the story of Gideon, O’Neill exhorted his fellow chaplains, “We must urge, instruct, and indoctrinate every fighting man to pray as well as fight. In Gideon’s day, and in our own, spiritually alert minorities carry the burdens and bring the victories.” O’Neill’s training letters and prayer cards went into the Third Army’s ranks starting 12 December 1944. Events on the battlefield turned dramatically on 16 December.

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Read more at Red County HERE.

Voters abandoning Republicans, Democrats in record numbers

Party affiliation may be losing its appeal.

More and more voters are registering as independents while the number of Democratic and Republican voters declines, according to a new study by USA Today.

The analysis found that since the 2008 elections, more than 2.5 million voters left both the major parties. Democrats lost the bulk of that, with 1.7 million people leaving the party since 2008.

Meanwhile, the number of independents has grown by 400,000 in that time.

The figures are a potential boost to anybody thinking of running as a third-party candidate. But independents are still a minority in the 28 states that register by party — there are 24 million independents, compared with 30 million Republicans and 42 million Democrats.

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Read more at FoxNews.com HERE.